Clinicopathological features and prognoses in younger and older patients with gastric cancer

Aggressive Histology and Extensive Metastasis Characteristic of Very Young Gastric Cancer (Less Than 30 Years): A Retrospective Clinical Audit

Narendran KrishnamoorthiObjectives  Gastric cancer (GC) is an aggressive disease and remains one of the most common causes of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Incidence of gastric cancer in young (GCY) varies between 2 and 8%. GCY faces unique challenges such as biological variation, diagnosis at an advanced stage, issues related to fertility preservation, and psychosocial considerations. This study aimed to find the differences in clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of GCY compared to gastric cancer in older adults (GCO). Material and Methods  This is a retrospective study from a tertiary care center. We screened records from 2015 to 2020, identified 33 records of GCY (less than 30 years), and compared the data with GCO (greater than 30 years) during 2015 and 2018. Results  We identified 33 patients with GCY with a median age of 28 years (21-30) and a female to male ratio of 2:1. In GCY, 60% of patients presented with metastatic disease. Diffuse-type histology was more common in the GCY than in GCO (66.7% vs. 41.7%, p  = 0.001). In patients with metastasis, multiple metastases were common in GCY compared to GCO (45% vs. 15%, p  = 0.003). The median duration of follow-up for all patients was 27 (24-29) months. In GCY, the median OS was not reached for patients treated with curative intent, and it was 13 months for those treated with palliative intent. Conclusion  The incidence of GCY in our study was like the western literature. Female patients with aggressive diffuse histology and multiple extensive metastases were characteristic of GCY. The survival outcomes were identical to GCO.

Impact of Age at Diagnosis on Clinicopathological Features, Prognosis, and Management of Gastric Cancer: A Retrospective Single-Center Experience from Spain

The impact of age on various aspects of gastric cancer (GC) remains controversial. Clarifying this issue can improve our understanding of the disease, refine risk stratification models, and aid in personalized therapeutic approaches. This study aimed to evaluate the influence of age at diagnosis on the clinicopathological features, prognosis, and management of a specific cohort of Spanish patients with resected GC. The study encompassed 315 patients treated at a single tertiary hospital in Spain, divided into two age-based subgroups: ≤65 years and >65 years. The mean and median ages at diagnosis were 72 and 76 years. Most tumors were diagnosed at pT3 stage (49.2%), and 59.6% of patients had lymph node metastases. 21.3% of cases were diagnosed with GC at age ≤ 65 years. Younger patients showed a significantly higher prevalence of flat, diffuse, high-grade tumors, signet-ring cells, perineural infiltration, D2 lymphadenectomies, and adjuvant therapy. They also exhibited a higher rate of recurrences, but had a significantly longer follow-up. Kaplan-Meier curves indicated no significant prognostic differences based on age. Finally, age did not independently predict overall survival or disease-free survival. Our results suggest that younger patients may require more aggressive treatment due to adverse clinicopathologic features, but the lack of prognostic differences among age groups in our cohort indicates the need for further investigation into the complex interplay between age, clinicopathologic factors, and long-term outcomes in GC.

Three-Tier Prognostic Index in Young Adults With Advanced Gastric Cancer

PURPOSE

To characterize clinical features and identify baseline prognostic factors for survival in young adults with advanced gastric cancer (YAAGC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 220 young inpatients (age less than or equal to 40 years) with an initial diagnosis of advanced gastric cancer were retrospectively enrolled in this study.

RESULTS

Of a consecutive cohort of 220 patients with YAAGC, the median overall survival (OS) time was 16.3 months. One-year survival rate was 43.6% (95% CI: 36.5 to 50.7). In this cohort, a female (71.4%, n = 157) predominance and a number of patients with poorly differentiated tumors (95.9%, n = 211) were observed. In the univariate analysis, OS was significantly associated with neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (≥3.12), hypoproteinemia (<40 g/L), presence of peritoneal or bone metastases, and previous gastrectomy of primary tumor or radical gastrectomy. In multivariate Cox regression analysis, hypoproteinemia [hazard ratio (HR) 1.522, 95% CI 1.085 to 2.137, p = 0.015] and high NLR level (HR 1.446, 95% CI 1.022 to 2.047, p = 0.021) were two independent poor prognostic factors, while previous radical gastrectomy was associated with a favorable OS (HR 0.345, 95% CI 0.205 to 0.583, p = 0.000). A three-tier prognostic index was constructed dividing patients into good-, intermediate-, or poor-risk groups. Median OS for good-, intermediate-, and poor-risk groups was 36.43, 17.87, and 11.27 months, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Three prognostic factors were identified, and a three-tier prognostic index was devised. The reported prognostic index may aid clinical decision-making, patient risk stratification, and planning of future clinical studies on YAAGC.

Gastric Cancer in Young Adults: A Different Clinical Entity from Carcinogenesis to Prognosis

Approximately 5.0% of gastric cancer (GC) patients are diagnosed before the age of 40 and are not candidates for screening programs in most countries and regions. The incidence of gastric cancer in young adults (GCYA) has declined over time in most countries except in the United States. Genetic alterations, environmental factors, and lifestyle may predispose some young adults to GC. According to molecular classifications, the cancer of most GCYA patients belongs to the genomically stable or microsatellite stable/epithelial-mesenchymal transition subtype, with the common genetic aberrations being mutations in CDH1. What characterizes GCYA are a higher prevalence in females, more aggressive tumor behaviors, diagnosis at advanced stages, fewer comorbidities and being better treatment candidates, and a similar or better survival outcome when compared with older patients. Considering the greater loss of life-years in younger patients, lowering the incidence of GC and diagnosing at a relatively early stage are the two most effective ways to decrease GC mortality. To achieve these goals, the low awareness of GCYA among general people, policy-makers, clinicians, and researchers should be changed.

Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) Score Is A Predictor Of Post-Operative Outcomes In Elderly Gastric Cancer Patients Undergoing Curative Gastrectomy: A Prospective Study

Purpose

The Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score is a recently developed measure that is calculated using the serum albumin level, total cholesterol level, and lymphocyte counts. The aim of this study was to examine whether the CONUT score can predict post-operative outcomes in elderly patients undergoing curative gastrectomy.

Patients and methods

Pre-operative CONUT scores were evaluated from August 2014 to September 2016 in 357 gastric cancer patients who were scheduled to undergo curative gastrectomy. The patients were divided into three groups according to pre-operative CONUT scores: normal, light, moderate, and severe. We then calculated the association between the patient’s CONUT score and post-operative complications.

Results

CONUT scores were statistically associated with age (P = 0.015), body mass index (P < 0.001), pre-operative hemoglobin level (P < 0.001), tumor-node-metastasis stage (P < 0.001), surgical method (P = 0.036), and post-operative complications (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that age and the CONUT score were independent predictors of post-operative complications and 1-year survival.

Conclusion

CONUT scores can be used to predict post-operative complications and 1-year survival in elderly gastric cancer patients undergoing curative gastrectomy. They can also be used to classify the nutritional status of patients, which can be helpful for pre–and post-operative nutritional management.