Clinical and molecular characteristics associated with the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors for solid tumors: a meta-analysis

Synthesis and preliminary biological evaluation of a novel 99mTc-labeled small molecule for PD-L1 imaging

In recent years, PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint blockade immunotherapy with remarkable efficacy has set off a heat wave. The expression level of PD-L1, which plays a predictive role in anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy, could be quantified by noninvasive imaging with radiotracers. Herein, we introduced the synthesis and preliminary biological evaluation of a novel 99mTc-labeled small molecule radiotracer [99mTc]G3C-CBM for PD-L1 imaging. [99mTc]G3C-CBM was achieved with high radiochemical purity (>96 %) and remained good stability in PBS and FBS. In competitive combination experiment, [99mTc]G3C-CBM was displaced by increasing concentrations of unlabeled G3C-CBM, resulting in an IC50 value of 41.25±2.23 nM for G3C-CBM. The uptake of [99mTc]G3C-CBM in A375-hPD-L1 cells (17.51±2.08 %) was approximately 6.47 folds of that in A375 cells (2.71±0.36 %) after co-incubation for 2 h. The biodistribution results showed that the radioactivity uptake in A375-hPD-L1 tumor reached the maximum (0.35±0.01 %ID/g) at 2 h post injection, and the optimum tumor/muscle ratio of 2.94±0.29 occurred at the same time. In addition, [99mTc]G3C-CBM was quickly cleared from the blood with a clearance half-life of just 119.25 min. These results indicate that [99mTc]G3C-CBM is a potential SPECT PD-L1 imaging agent and is worthy of further study.

Sex and anti-inflammatory treatment affect outcome of melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer patients with rheumatic immune-related adverse events

BACKGROUND

Rheumatic immune-related adverse events (R-irAEs) occur in 5-15% of patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and, unlike other irAEs, tend to be chronic. Herein, we investigate the factors influencing cancer and R-irAEs outcomes with particular focus on adverse effects of anti-inflammatory treatment.

METHODS

In this prospective, multicenter, long-term, observational study, R-irAEs were comprehensively analyzed in patients with malignant melanoma (MM, n=50) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC, n=41) receiving ICI therapy who were enrolled in the study between August 1, 2018, and December 11, 2022.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 33 months, progressive disease or death occurred in 66.0% and 30.0% of MM and 63.4% and 39.0% of patients with NSCLC. Male sex (progression-free survival (PFS): p=0.013, and overall survival (OS): p=0.009), flare of a pre-existing condition (vs de novo R-irAE, PFS: p=0.010) and in trend maximum glucocorticoid (GC) doses >10 mg and particularly ≥1 mg/kg prednisolone equivalent (sex-adjusted PFS: p=0.056, OS: p=0.051) were associated with worse cancer outcomes. Patients receiving disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) showed significantly longer PFS (n=14, p=0.011) and OS (n=20, p=0.018). Effects of these variables on PFS and/or OS persisted in adjusted Cox regression models. Additionally, GC treatment negatively correlated with the time from diagnosis of malignancy and the latency from ICI start until R-irAE onset (all p<0.05). R-irAE features and outcomes were independent of other baseline patient characteristics in both studied cancer entities.

CONCLUSION

Male sex, flare of pre-existing rheumatologic conditions and extensive GC treatment appeared to be linked with unfavorable cancer outcomes, while DMARD use had a favorable impact. These findings challenge the current dogma of restrictive DMARD use for R-irAE and thus may pave the way to better strategies and randomized controlled trials for the growing number of patients with R-irAE.

Regulation of post-translational modification of PD-L1 and advances in tumor immunotherapy

The immune checkpoint molecules programmed cell death receptor 1 (PD-1) and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) are one of the most promising targets for tumor immunotherapy. PD-L1 is overexpressed on the surface of tumor cells and inhibits T cell activation upon binding to PD⁃1 on the surface of T cells, resulting in tumor immune escape. The therapeutic strategy of targeting PD-1/PD-L1 involves blocking this binding and restoring the tumor-killing effect of immune cells. However, in clinical settings, a relatively low proportion of cancer patients have responded well to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade, and clinical outcomes have reached a bottleneck and no substantial progress has been made. In recent years, PD-L1 post-translation modifications (PTMs) have gradually become a hot topic in the field of PD-L1 research, which will provide new insights to improve the efficacy of current anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapies. Here, we summarized and discussed multiple PTMs of PD-L1, including glycosylation, ubiquitination, phosphorylation, acetylation and palmitoylation, with a major emphasis on mechanism-based therapeutic strategies (including relevant enzymes and targets that are already in clinical use and that may become drugs in the future). We also summarized the latest research progress of PTMs of PD-L1/PD-1 in regulating immunotherapy. The review provided novel strategies and directions for tumor immunotherapy research based on the PTMs of PD-L1/PD-1.

Liujunzi decoction exerts potent antitumor activity in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma by inhibiting miR-34a/STAT3/IL-6R feedback loop, and modifies antitumor immunity

BACKGROUND

Liujunzi decoction (LJZD), a traditional herbal formula and one of the most commonly used adjuvant medications for the treatment of oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), exerts good antitumor and immunomodulatory activity. However, its specific mechanism of action remains largely unclear.

PURPOSE

In order to examine the potential primary and adjuvant antitumor mechanisms of LJZD, both in vitro and in vivo.

METHODS

IL-6 and miR-34a inhibitors were used to activate the miR-34a/STAT3/IL-6R feedback loop to observe the effects of LJZD. A humanised mouse model with a functional human immune system was constructed to evaluate the antitumor efficacy of LJZD in vivo on xenograft tumours, which was compared to that of the positive control drug anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibodies (mAb). Finally, a co-culture system of peripheral blood mononuclear and tumour cells in vitro was used to analyse the cytotoxic activity of LJZD on T cells.

RESULTS

LJZD significantly interfered with IL-6-induced activation of the miR-34a/STAT3/IL-6R feedback loop in ESCC by restoring the expression of the tumour suppressor miR-34a, and inhibited the proliferation of EC109 oesophageal cancer cells in a dose-dependant manner. Furthermore, LJZD effectively suppressed oesophageal tumour growth in vivo and alleviated organ injury and visceral index. Furthermore, LJZD boosted antitumor immunity by increasing IFN-γ expression and CD8⁺tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) infiltration in the peripheral blood and tumour tissues, respectively, which may be related to a decrease in PD-1, but not PD-L1 expression. Finally, we confirmed that LJZD strengthens the killing ability of T cells by suppressing PD-1 expression in a co-culture system in vitro.

CONCLUSION

LJZD exerts excellent antitumor effect by interfering with the miR-34a/STAT3/IL-6R feedback loop and augmenting antitumor immune responses. Which provides new insights into mechanisms for LJZD and sheds light on the multifaceted role of phytomedicine in cancer.

Programmed Cell Death-Ligand 1 in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Molecular Insights, Preclinical and Clinical Data, and Therapies

Aberrant expression of the programmed cell death protein ligand 1 (PD-L1) constitutes one of the main immune evasion mechanisms of cancer cells. The approval of drugs against the PD-1-PD-L1 axis has given new impetus to the chemo-therapy of many malignancies. We performed a literature review from 1992 to August 2022, summarizing evidence regarding molecular structures, physiological and pathological roles, mechanisms of PD-L1 overexpression, and immunotherapy evasion. Furthermore, we summarized the studies concerning head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC) immunotherapy and the prospects for improving the associated outcomes, such as identifying treatment response biomarkers, new pharmacological combinations, and new molecules. PD-L1 overexpression can occur via four mechanisms: genetic modifications; inflammatory signaling; oncogenic pathways; microRNA or protein-level regulation. Four molecular mechanisms of resistance to immunotherapy have been identified: tumor cell adaptation; changes in T-cell function or proliferation; alterations of the tumor microenvironment; alternative immunological checkpoints. Immunotherapy was indeed shown to be superior to traditional chemotherapy in locally advanced/recurrent/metastatic HNSCC treatments.

Evolution of Preclinical Characterization and Insights into Clinical Pharmacology of Checkpoint Inhibitors Approved for Cancer Immunotherapy

Cancer immunotherapy has significantly advanced the treatment paradigm in oncology, with approvals of immuno‐oncology agents for over 16 indications, many of them first line. Checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) are recognized as an essential backbone for a successful anticancer therapy regimen. This review focuses on the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulatory approvals of major CPIs and the evolution of translational advances since their first approval close to a decade ago. In addition, critical preclinical and clinical pharmacology considerations, an overview of the pharmacokinetic and dose/regimen aspects, and a discussion of the future of CPI translational and clinical pharmacology as combination therapy becomes a mainstay of industrial immunotherapy development and in clinical practice are also discussed.

Association of Baseline and Pharmacodynamic Biomarkers With Outcomes in Patients Treated With the PD-1 Inhibitor Budigalimab

Budigalimab, a novel anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody, demonstrated efficacy and biomarker pharmacodynamics in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) or non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) consistent with those reported by other PD-1 inhibitors. Herein are presented additional outcomes of biomarker analyses from the phase 1 study of budigalimab monotherapy in patients with HNSCC and NSCLC (NCT03000257). PD-1 inhibitor naive patients with advanced HNSCC (n=41) or NSCLC (n=40) received budigalimab intravenously at 250 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W) or 500 mg Q4W until progression. Archival tumor specimens were evaluated by immunohistochemistry for CD8 and tumor PD-1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, RNA, and whole-exome sequencing. Serum and whole blood samples were acquired at baseline and at select on-treatment time points. As of October 2019, best overall response of 15% in HNSCC and 18% in NSCLC was observed in all treated patients; both cohorts reported responses in PD-L1+ and PD-L1- tumors. Treatment with budigalimab was associated with increases in multiple soluble biomarkers including interferon gamma-induced chemokines. Expanded overall T-cell counts, total CD8 T-cell counts, and percentages of CD8+CD45RA-CD62L- effector memory T cells were observed at cycle 1, day 15 in responders. Univariate analysis demonstrated an association between prolonged progression-free survival and higher tumor mutational burden/neoantigen load, smaller tumor size, lower platelet-lymphocyte ratios, lower CCL23, lower colony-stimulating factor 1, and lower interleukin-6 levels at baseline. The biomarker analysis presented herein identified additional early pharmacodynamic biomarkers associated with anti-PD-1 activity and improved clinical responses to budigalimab in patients with advanced HNSCC and NSCLC.

Anti-PD-1 and Anti-PD-L1 in Head and Neck Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis

Objective

The monoclonal antibodies anti-programmed death protein-1 (anti-PD-1) nivolumab and pembrolizumab are the first immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) approved for treatment of recurrent/metastatic head and neck carcinoma R/M HNSCC in first line and in platinum refractory disease. This network meta-analysis aims to investigate the efficacy of anti-PD-1- vs anti-PD-L1-based therapy in R/M HNSCC cancer patients through a systematic review of the literature to provide support for evidence-based treatment decisions. In particular, the effectiveness of ICIs for R/M HNSCC is analyzed according to the different mechanisms of action of the check-points inhibitory drugs in different subgroups of patients.

Methods

We did a systematic literature review and network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, Embase, Medline, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science. Our search identified a total of five randomized controlled trials: Keynote 040, Keynote 048, Eagle, Condor, Checkmate 141. These trials included 3001 patients. Treatment was sub-categorized into PD-L1-based, PD-1-based, and standard chemotherapy. Treatments were indirectly compared with anti-PD-L1-based therapy.

Results

The network meta-analysis demonstrated no significant differences in OS between different subgroups except for the metastatic patients in which anti-PD-1-based therapy was associated with significantly less risk of death. Furthermore, anti-PD-1-based therapy appeared to be effective in smoker patients and in human papilloma-negative (HPV) patients. Conversely, anti-PD-L1-based therapy seems to be better efficient in female patients, in locally recurrent setting and in HPV positive patients.

Conclusion

This is the first NMA study that aimed to indirectly compare anti-PD-1- and anti-PD-L1-based therapy in HNSCC patients. The results of our NMA could help define a profile of patient responder or resistant to specific classes of immune drugs and can be used to guide/design future studies in the novel scenario of precision immune-oncology.

Expression of Programmed Cell Death Proteins in Kaposi Sarcoma and Cutaneous Angiosarcoma

Not only for cutaneous angiosarcoma (CAS) patients but also for advanced and therapy-refractory patients with classic Kaposi sarcoma (CKS) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-associated Kaposi sarcoma (HIV-KS) there is a high need for more effective treatment modalities. The aim of this work was to study programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) protein expression and related immune parameters in CKS, HIV-KS, and CAS and correlate it with other immunologic parameters and clinical data. Immunohistochemistry was performed on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor tissue of 19 CKS, 7 HIV-KS, and 12 CAS patients using antibodies against the following (and they are): PD-1, PD-L1, CD4, CD8, CD56, and FOXP3. PD-1 expression significantly correlated with PD-L1 expression Moreover, PD-1 and PD-L1 expression significantly correlated with CD56 and FOXP3 expression. High intratumoral FOXP3 expression was significantly associated with disease relapse (P=0.029). CD4 and FOXP3 expression was significantly higher in CKS and CAS, as compared with HIV-KS. All in all, PD-1 and PD-L1 expression was relatively weak and did not significantly differ between CKS, HIV-KS, and CAS patients. Nevertheless, PD-1 was positive in 31.6% of CKS, 28.6% of HIV-KS, and 33.3% of CAS patients. PD-L1 was expressed in 36.6% of CKS, 28.6% of HIV-KS, and 41.7% of CAS patients. We have provided evidence that PD-1/PD-L1 signalling is of importance in angiosarcomas such as CKS, HIV-KS, and CAS. Our results support the notion that the use of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors may represent an effective strategy against these tumors.

Comparisons of Underlying Mechanisms, Clinical Efficacy and Safety Between Anti-PD-1 and Anti-PD-L1 Immunotherapy: The State-of-the-Art Review and Future Perspectives

Over the past decade, diverse PD-1/PD-L1 blockades have demonstrated significant clinical benefit in across a wide range of tumor and cancer types. With the increasing number of PD-1/PD-L1 blockades available in the market, differences between the clinical performance of each of them started to be reported. Here, we provide a comprehensive historical and biological perspective regarding the underlying mechanism and clinical performance of PD-1/PD-L1 blockades, with an emphasis on the comparisons of their clinical efficacy and safety. The real-world evidence indicated that PD-1 blockade may be more effective than the PD-L1, though no significant differences were found as regards to their safety profiles. Future head-to-head studies are warranted for direct comparison between them. Finally, we summarize the yet to be elucidated questions and future promise of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy, including a need to explore novel biomarkers, novel combinatorial strategies, and their clinical use on chronic infection.

Comprehensive exploration of tumor mutational burden and immune infiltration in diffuse glioma

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been used as a novel treatment for diffuse gliomas, but the efficacy varies with patients, which may be associated with the tumor mutational burden (TMB) and immune infiltration. We aimed to explore the relationship between the two and their impacts on the prognosis.

METHODS

The data of the training set were downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). "DESeq2" R package was used for differential analysis and identification of differentially expressed genes (DEGs). A gene risk score model was constructed based on DEGs, and a nomogram was developed combined with clinical features. With the CIBERSORT algorithm, the relationship between TMB and immune infiltration was analyzed, and an immune risk score model was constructed. Two models were verification in the validation set downloaded from the Chinese Glioma Genome Atlas (CGGA).

RESULTS

Higher TMB was related to worse prognosis, older age, higher grade, and higher immune checkpoint expression. The gene risk score model was constructed based on BIRC5, SAA1, and TNFRSF11B, and their expressions were all negatively correlated with prognosis. The nomogram was developed combined with age and grade. The immune risk score model was constructed based on M0 macrophages, neutrophils, naïve CD4⁺ T cells, and activated mast cells. The proportions of the first two were higher in the high-TMB group and correlated with worse prognosis, while the latter two were precisely opposite.

CONCLUSIONS

In diffuse gliomas, TMB was negatively correlated with prognosis. The association of immune infiltration with TMB and prognosis varied with the type of immune cells. The nomogram and risk score models can accurately predict prognosis. The results can help identify patients suitable for ICIs and potential therapeutic targets, thus improve the treatment of diffuse gliomas.

Efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer patients with different genes mutation: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Latest clinical trials have proved the better overall survival (OS) for the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors verse chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. However, we still have no clear ideas of the factors which could affect the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Cancer, essentially, is a disease related to genes mutation. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors for NSCLC patients with different genes mutation.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched for all clinical trials in NSCLC until December 16, 2019. The hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of OS or progression-free survival (PFS) were used.

RESULTS

A total of 4453 patients from 7 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. Immune checkpoint inhibitors significantly prolonged the OS (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.60-0.67) in NSCLC patients having epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) wild-type versus chemotherapy. Meanwhile, they prolonged the OS (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.39-0.94) in NSCLC patients with Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) mutation. No matter PD-L1 tumor proportion scores were >1% or <1%, immune checkpoint inhibitors were more effective than chemotherapy (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.55-0.75).

CONCLUSION

Immune checkpoint inhibitors are more efficacious than chemotherapy in NSCLC patients with EGFR wild-type, KRAS mutation, and any PD-L1 tumor proportion scores.

Recent advance of peptide-based molecules and nonpeptidic small-molecules modulating PD-1/PD-L1 protein-protein interaction or targeting PD-L1 protein degradation

Tumor immunotherapy has made great progress in recent years. In the tumor microenvironment, the binding of PD-1 and its ligand PD-L1 can promote tumor immune escape and tumor survival. Clinical studies have indicated that antibodies blocking PD-1 and PD-L1 have reliable effects on many advanced malignant tumors. However, no small-molecule inhibitors have been approved so far, indicating that the development of marketable small-molecules PD-1/PD-L1 targeted therapy drugs is a challenging process. Small-molecule inhibitors can overcome the limitations of monoclonal antibodies, including poor oral bioavailability, high cost, poor tissue and tumor penetration and long half-life, which prompt researchers to turn their attention to the development of peptide molecules and small-molecule inhibitors modulating PD-1/PD-L1 to overcome some disadvantages of monoclonal antibodies or targeting PD-L1 protein degradation as potential alternatives or supplements. In this review, we will focus on the peptide-based and nonpeptidic molecules against PD-1/PD-L1 base on the structural classification. More importantly, we also focus on the latest research progress of small-molecules mediated PD-L1 degradation mechanism.

Use of Immunotherapy With Programmed Cell Death 1 vs Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1 Inhibitors in Patients With Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Importance

Immune checkpoint inhibitors of programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and its ligand (PD-L1) have led to a paradigm shift in cancer treatment. Understanding the clinical efficacy and safety profile of these drugs is necessary for treatment strategy in clinical practice.

Objective

To assess the differences between anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 regarding efficacy and safety shown in randomized clinical trials across various tumor types.

Data Sources

Systematic searches of PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Embase were conducted from January 1, 2000, to March 1, 2019. In addition, abstracts and presentations from all major conference proceedings were reviewed.

Study Selection

All randomized clinical trials that compared anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 with standard treatment in patients with cancer were selected as candidates. Retrospective studies, single-arm phase 1/2 studies, and trials comparing anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 with other immunotherapies were excluded. Studies of anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 therapy were screened and paired by the matching of clinical characteristics as mirror groups.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

Three investigators independently extracted data from each study following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guideline. Trial names, first author, year of publication, study design, National Clinical Trial identifier number, blinding status, study phase, pathologic characteristics, number of patients, patients' age and sex distribution, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status, lines of treatment, study drugs, biomarker status, follow-up time, incidence of adverse events, and hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs for overall survival and progression-free survival were extracted. A random-effects model was applied for data analysis.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Differences in OS between anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 across different cancer types were assessed. An effect size was derived from each mirror group and then pooled across all groups using a random-effects model.

Results

Nineteen randomized clinical trials involving 11 379 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, anti-PD-1 exhibited superior overall survival (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.65-0.86; P < .001) and progression-free survival (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.56-0.96; P = .02) compared with anti-PD-L1. No significant difference was observed in their safety profiles. Sensitivity analysis presented consistency in the overall estimates across these analyses. Consistent results were observed through frequentist and bayesian approaches with the same studies.

Conclusions and Relevance

Comprehensive analysis suggests that anti-PD-1 exhibited favorable survival outcomes and a safety profile comparable to that of anti-PD-L1, which may provide a useful guide for clinicians.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors retain effectiveness in older patients with cutaneous metastatic melanoma

INTRODUCTION

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have dramatically changed the treatment landscape for advanced melanoma, but their use in older patients remains understudied. An age-related decline in immune function is of concern when treating older patients because host immune factors can influence clinical outcomes with immunotherapy. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of ICIs in patients 65 years and older.

METHODS

Using the SEER-Medicare data, we evaluated survival by first systemic treatment type in a retrospective cohort study of patients aged 65 years and older who were diagnosed with stage IV cutaneous melanoma between 2012 and 2015. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

A total of 541 patients were included in this study. Median survival differed significantly between groups (p < 0.0001) and was longest in patients treated with PD-1 inhibitors (34.0 months), followed by CTLA-4 inhibitors (16.8 months), targeted therapy (9.7 months), chemotherapy (7.1 months), and no systemic therapy (3.6 months). The ICI survival benefit persisted after adjusting for age, sex, comorbidities, M stage, the presence of brain metastases, and evaluation at an NCI-designated cancer center. Hazard ratios comparing ICIs to no systemic therapy were 0.35 (95% CI: 0.24-0.52) for PD-1 inhibitors and 0.48 (95% CI: 0.37-0.63) for CTLA-4 inhibitors. We did not observe a difference in ICI effectiveness by age group (65-74 vs ≥75).

CONCLUSIONS

In a nationally representative cohort of patients with advanced melanoma, ICI therapy delivered in a real world setting significantly improved survival in patients aged 65 years and older.

Efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus nab-paclitaxel for patients with non-small cell lung cancer who have progressed after platinum-based chemotherapy

Background

Immunotherapy combined with platinum-based chemotherapy is now the standard first-line treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. However, limited evidence exists to show the efficacy of immunotherapy plus taxanes for patients who have progressed after platinum-based chemotherapy.

Methods

The immunotherapy naïve patients with metastatic NSCLC who received anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy or combined with nab-paclitaxel after prior platinum-based chemotherapy from 2015 to 2018 in PLA General Hospital were identified. The progression-free survival, overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and safety were assessed.

Results

Of 57 patients, 40 were treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy and 17 were treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 plus nab-paclitaxel. With a median OS follow-up of 16.3 months, the nab-paclitaxel group showed significantly longer OS compared with the immune monotherapy group (median, 28.6 months versus 15.9 months, log-rank p = 0.020). When adjusted by covariates in COX proportional regression model, both the treatment group [p = 0.009, hazard ratio (HR) 0.361; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.168-0.773] and performance status (p = 0.003, HR 0.372; 95% CI 0.192-0.721) demonstrated independent association with the longer OS from combination therapy. In addition, ORR was 23.5% (4/17) in the immune checkpoints inhibitors (ICIs) plus nab-paclitaxel group versus 13.5% (5/37) in immune monotherapy group (p = 0.439), with a DCR of 88.2% (15/17) and 59.5% (22/37) (p = 0.034), respectively. The incidence of grade 3/4 adverse events was 23.5% (4/17) in the combination group and 2.5% (1/40) in the immune monotherapy group.

Conclusion

PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor plus nab-paclitaxel resulted in significantly longer OS and higher response versus ICI single agent in metastatic NSCLC patients who have progressed after platinum-based chemotherapy. These findings need to be further explored by prospective studies.

Association between PD-L1 Expression and the Prognosis and Clinicopathologic Features of Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The expression of programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and its correlation with the prognosis and clinicopathologic features of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remain controversial to date. Concerning this issue, we had conducted a meta-analysis of relevant studies searched in the Web of Science, PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases. The Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale was applied to assess the quality of the included studies. The hazard ratio (HR) and its corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were collected by Stata 12.0 and used for the results of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). A total of 1,644 patients in 8 studies were included in this meta-analysis. Results showed that PD-L1 expression significantly correlated with OS (HR = 1.98, 95% CI: 1.22-3.22, Z = 2.77, p = 0.006) and DFS (HR = 3.70, 95% CI: 2.07-6.62, Z = 4.40, p = 0.0001) in ccRCC. Subgroup analysis indicated that PD-L1 expression significantly correlated with the lymph-gland transfer ratio (HR = 2.45, 95% CI: 1.02-5.92, Z = 1.99, p = 0.05) and tumor necrosis (HR = 6.05, 95% CI: 3.78-9.67, Z = 7.51, p < 0.00001). This meta-analysis suggests that PD-L1 expression is a valuable prognostic tool for patients with ccRCC. Subgroup analyses demonstrated that it was helpful for screening patients with RCC who need anti-PD-1/PD-L1 treatment and support them to benefit from such immune-targeted therapy.

Effectiveness of durvalumab versus chemotherapy in metastatic urothelial cancer: an observational, indirect comparison

Aim: To compare the overall survival of patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) who failed platinum-based chemotherapy and received durvalumab or chemotherapy. Patients & methods: In an indirect comparison of patients with mUC who failed platinum-based chemotherapy, those who received durvalumab in a single-arm study were matched to patients from the Flatiron oncology electronic medical record database who received chemotherapy (n = 158 for each cohort). Matching was based on propensity scores. Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox regression models were utilized. Results: Median overall survival was 11.2 months (95% CI: 7.2-16.9) for durvalumab versus 8.2 months (95% CI: 6.7-9.8) for chemotherapy (hazard ratio: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.48-0.84). Conclusion: As a second-line therapy for mUC, durvalumab was associated with longer overall survival than chemotherapy.

Optimal Management of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: Current Perspectives

INTRODUCTION

Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a relatively uncommon urologic malignancy for which there has not been significant improvement in survival over the past few decades, highlighting the need for optimal multi-modality management.

METHODS

A non-systematic review of the latest literature was performed to include relevant articles up to June 2019. It summarizes the epidemiologic risk factors associated with UTUC, including smoking, carcinogenic aromatic amines, arsenic, aristolochic acid, and Lynch syndrome. Molecular pathways underlying UTUC and potential druggable targets are outlined.

RESULTS

Surgical management for UTUC includes kidney-sparing surgery (KSS) for low-risk disease and radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for high-risk disease. Endoscopic management of UTUC may include ureteroscopic or percutaneous resection. Topical instillation therapy post-KSS aims to reduce recurrence, progression and to treat carcinoma-in-situ; this may be achieved retrogradely (via ureteric catheterization), antegradely (via percutaneous nephrostomy) or via reflux through double-J stent. RNU, which may be performed via open, laparoscopic or robot-assisted approaches, is the gold standard treatment for high-risk UTUC. The distal cuff may be dealt with extravesical, transvesical or endoscopic techniques. Peri-operative chemotherapy and immunotherapy are increasingly utilized; level 1 evidence exists for adjuvant chemotherapy, but neoadjuvant chemotherapy is favored as kidney function is better prior to RNU. Immunotherapy is primarily reserved for metastatic UTUC but is currently being investigated in the perioperative setting.

CONCLUSION

The optimal management of UTUC includes a firm understanding of the epidemiological factors and molecular pathways. Surgical management includes KSS for low-risk disease and RNU for high-risk disease. Peri-operative immunotherapy and chemotherapy may be considered as evidence mounts.

Molecular imaging biomarkers for immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have substantially changed the field of oncology over the past few years. ICIs offer an alternative treatment strategy by exploiting the patients' immune system, resulting in a T cell mediated anti-tumor response. These therapies are effective in multiple different tumor types. Unfortunately, a substantial group of patients do not respond to ICIs. Molecular imaging, using single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and positron emission tomography (PET), can provide non-invasive whole-body visualization of tumor and immune cell characteristics and might support patient selection or response evaluations for ICI therapies. In this review, recent studies with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-PET imaging, imaging of immune checkpoints and imaging of immune cells will be discussed. These studies are until now mainly exploratory, but the first results suggest that molecular imaging biomarkers could have a role in the evaluation of ICI therapy.

"Bridging the Gap" Everything that Could Have Been Avoided If We Had Applied Gender Medicine, Pharmacogenetics and Personalized Medicine in the Gender-Omics and Sex-Omics Era

Gender medicine is the first step of personalized medicine and patient-centred care, an essential development to achieve the standard goal of a holistic approach to patients and diseases. By addressing the interrelation and integration of biological markers (i.e., sex) with indicators of psychological/cultural behaviour (i.e., gender), gender medicine represents the crucial assumption for achieving the personalized health-care required in the third millennium. However, ‘sex’ and ‘gender’ are often misused as synonyms, leading to frequent misunderstandings in those who are not deeply involved in the field. Overall, we have to face the evidence that biological, genetic, epigenetic, psycho-social, cultural, and environmental factors mutually interact in defining sex/gender differences, and at the same time in establishing potential unwanted sex/gender disparities. Prioritizing the role of sex/gender in physiological and pathological processes is crucial in terms of efficient prevention, clinical signs’ identification, prognosis definition, and therapy optimization. In this regard, the omics-approach has become a powerful tool to identify sex/gender-specific disease markers, with potential benefits also in terms of socio-psychological wellbeing for each individual, and cost-effectiveness for National Healthcare systems. “Being a male or being a female” is indeed important from a health point of view and it is no longer possible to avoid “sex and gender lens” when approaching patients. Accordingly, personalized healthcare must be based on evidence from targeted research studies aimed at understanding how sex and gender influence health across the entire life span. The rapid development of genetic tools in the molecular medicine approaches and their impact in healthcare is an example of highly specialized applications that have moved from specialists to primary care providers (e.g., pharmacogenetic and pharmacogenomic applications in routine medical practice). Gender medicine needs to follow the same path and become an established medical approach. To face the genetic, molecular and pharmacological bases of the existing sex/gender gap by means of omics approaches will pave the way to the discovery and identification of novel drug-targets/therapeutic protocols, personalized laboratory tests and diagnostic procedures (sex/gender-omics). In this scenario, the aim of the present review is not to simply resume the state-of-the-art in the field, rather an opportunity to gain insights into gender medicine, spanning from molecular up to social and psychological stances. The description and critical discussion of some key selected multidisciplinary topics considered as paradigmatic of sex/gender differences and sex/gender inequalities will allow to draft and design strategies useful to fill the existing gap and move forward.

The efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer patients of different age groups: a meta-analysis

Background

Age is closely related to the efficacy of treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Latest clinical trials have proved the better overall survival (OS) for the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors verse chemotherapy in NSCLC patients. However, we had no clear idea of the efficacy of them in elderly patients. So we conducted a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors for NSCLC patients of different age groups and summarized overall treatment-related adverse events.

Materials and methods

PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library were searched for all clinical trials in NSCLC until 30th of April 2019. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing immune checkpoint inhibitors with chemotherapy in NSCLC patients. The hazard ratio (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of OS, progression-free survival or adverse events (AEs) were used.

Results

A total of 4994 patients from 8 RCTs were included. Immune checkpoint inhibitors significantly prolonged the OS (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.61–0.89) versus chemotherapy in NSCLC patients who were less than 65 years old. Also, they prolonged the OS (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.59–0.93) in NSCLC patients who were more than 65 years old. However, there was no statistical significance of OS (HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.57–1.30) among NSCLC patients who were more than 75 years old. It also showed that the single use of immune checkpoint inhibitors had fewer all-grade AEs.

Conclusion

Regardless of the NSCLC patients who were less or more than 65 years, immune checkpoint inhibitors could achieve better OS than chemotherapy. But there was no significant difference when NSCLC patients who were more than 75 years old. Older patient should be offered immune therapies if it is possible and the mechanism in old age treatment should be further studied.

IFN-gamma-induced PD-L1 expression in melanoma depends on p53 expression

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibition and in particular anti-PD-1 immunotherapy have revolutionized the treatment of advanced melanoma. In this regard, higher tumoral PD-L1 protein (gene name: CD274) expression is associated with better clinical response and increased survival to anti-PD-1 therapy. Moreover, there is increasing evidence that tumor suppressor proteins are involved in immune regulation and are capable of modulating the expression of immune checkpoint proteins. Here, we determined the role of p53 protein (gene name: TP53) in the regulation of PD-L1 expression in melanoma.

Methods

We analyzed publicly available mRNA and protein expression data from the cancer genome/proteome atlas and performed immunohistochemistry on tumors with known TP53 status. Constitutive and IFN-ɣ-induced PD-L1 expression upon p53 knockdown in wildtype, TP53-mutated or JAK2-overexpressing melanoma cells or in cells, in which p53 was rendered transcriptionally inactive by CRISPR/Cas9, was determined by immunoblot or flow cytometry. Similarly, PD-L1 expression was investigated after overexpression of a transcriptionally-impaired p53 (L22Q, W23S) in TP53-wt or a TP53-knockout melanoma cell line. Immunoblot was applied to analyze the IFN-ɣ signaling pathway.

Results

For TP53-mutated tumors, an increased CD274 mRNA expression and a higher frequency of PD-L1 positivity was observed. Interestingly, positive correlations of IFNG mRNA and PD-L1 protein in both TP53-wt and -mutated samples and of p53 and PD-L1 protein suggest a non-transcriptional mode of action of p53. Indeed, cell line experiments revealed a diminished IFN-ɣ-induced PD-L1 expression upon p53 knockdown in both wildtype and TP53-mutated melanoma cells, which was not the case when p53 wildtype protein was rendered transcriptionally inactive or by ectopic expression of p53^L22Q,W23S, a transcriptionally-impaired variant, in TP53-wt cells. Accordingly, expression of p53^L22Q,W23S in a TP53-knockout melanoma cell line boosted IFN-ɣ-induced PD-L1 expression. The impaired PD-L1-inducibility after p53 knockdown was associated with a reduced JAK2 expression in the cells and was almost abrogated by JAK2 overexpression.

Conclusions

While having only a small impact on basal PD-L1 expression, both wildtype and mutated p53 play an important positive role for IFN-ɣ-induced PD-L1 expression in melanoma cells by supporting JAK2 expression. Future studies should address, whether p53 expression levels might influence response to anti-PD-1 immunotherapy.

Association Between Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Expression and Clinicopathological Characteristics, Structural Recurrence, and Biochemical Recurrence/Persistent Disease in Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma

Background: Expression of the programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) in medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) has been rarely reported. In this study, we evaluated PD-L1 positivity in MTC and analyzed its correlation with clinicopathological characteristics, structural recurrence (SR), and biochemical recurrence/persistent disease (BcR/BcPD). We also evaluated the prevalence of PD-L1 expression in patients developing distant or unresectable locoregional recurrence. Methods: In total, 201 consecutive MTC patients who underwent initial surgery in our institution from January 2006 to December 2015 were included. PD-L1 expression was evaluated by immunohistochemical staining and was considered positive in case of a combined positive score ≥1. The association of PD-L1 positivity with clinicopathological characteristics, structural recurrence-free survival (SRFS), and BcR/BcPD was retrospectively investigated. Results: The median follow-up length of the entire cohort was 73 months. We observed positive PD-L1 staining in 29 (14.4%) patients who were more likely to have a larger tumor size (p = 0.002), lymph node metastases (p = 0.036), and advanced TNM staging (p = 0.019). The five-year SRFS of the PD-L1-negative and PD-L1-positive groups was 85.4% and 57.9% (p = 0.001). Multivariate Cox analysis showed that PD-L1 positivity was independently associated with SR (hazard ratio = 2.19 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-4.77], p = 0.047). Furthermore, multivariate logistic analysis showed that PD-L1 positivity was significantly associated with BcR/BcPD (odds ratio = 3.16 [CI 1.16-8.66], p = 0.025). During the study period, 20 patients developed distant or unresectable locoregional recurrence, among whom 8 (40%) were PD-L1 positive, which was much higher than in the entire MTC population. Conclusions: Using a large cohort of MTC patients, we demonstrate that PD-L1 positivity is associated with aggressive clinicopathological features and is independently predictive of SR and BcR/BcPD. Furthermore, a higher rate of PD-L1 expression in patients with incurable recurrence has been observed. Therefore, immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting the programmed cell death-1 (PD-1)/PD-L1 pathway may be a potential therapeutic strategy to treat advanced MTC.