Safety and Efficacy of Chemotherapy Combined with Anlotinib Plus Anlotinib Maintenance in Chinese Patients with Advanced/Metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcoma

Anlotinib destabilizes PAX3-FOXO1 to induce rhabdomyosarcoma cell death via upregulating NEK2

BACKGROUND

Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is one of the most common soft tissue sarcomas in children and adolescents, in which PAX3-FOXO1 fusion gene positive patients have very poor prognosis. PAX3-FOXO1 has been identified as an independent prognostic predictor in RMS, with no currently available targeted therapeutic intervention. The novel tyrosine kinase inhibitor anlotinib exhibits a wide range of anticancer effects in multiple types of cancers; however, there have been no relevant studies regarding its application in RMS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We investigated the effects of PAX3-FOXO1 on the therapeutic efficacy of anlotinib using the CCK-8 assay, flow cytometry, invasion assay, wound healing assay, western blotting, quantitative polymerase chain reaction(qPCR), and xenograft experiments. RNA-seq and co-immunoprecipitation assays were conducted to determine the specific mechanism by which anlotinib regulates PAX3-FOXO1 expression.

RESULTS

Anlotinib effectively inhibited RMS cell proliferation and promoted apoptosis and G2/M phase arrest while impeding tumor growth in vivo. Downregulation of PAX3-FOXO1 enhances the antitumor effects of anlotinib. Anlotinib upregulates protein kinase NEK2 and increases the degradation of PAX3-FOXO1 via the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway, leading to a reduction in PAX3-FOXO1 protein levels.

CONCLUSION

Anlotinib effectively inhibited the malignant progression of RMS and promoted degradation of the fusion protein PAX3-FOXO1. Anlotinib could be a targeted therapeutic approach to treat PAX3-FOXO1 fusion-positive RMS.

Anlotinib hydrochloride consolidation after concurrent chemoradiotherapy in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: a truncated, randomized, multicenter, clinical study (ALTER-L029)

Anlotinib is an antiangiogenic drug that shows good efficacy and safety in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of anlotinib for consolidation therapy in patients with stage III locally advanced, unresectable NSCLC after concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT). This was a randomized, parallel-controlled, open-label, multicenter, phase II trial of patients with unresectable/nonoperated NSCLC treated with cCRT. The participants were randomized 2:1 to the anlotinib or control group. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints were the disease control rate (DCR) and overall survival. This study was terminated early due to poor recruitment. Nine and two participants were randomly assigned to the anlotinib and control groups, respectively. One participant in the control group was excluded due to taking prohibited medications before the first efficacy evaluation. In the anlotinib group, the median age was 63 (range, 37-74) years. Two participants achieved partial response, six stable disease, and one progressive disease as best response. The DCR was 88.9%. The median PFS was 11.5 months, and the 12-month PFS rate was 33.9%. All related adverse events were grade 1 or 2. Two participants had a dose adjustment during the study. The evaluable data suggest that anlotinib alone was effective and tolerable in consolidation therapy after cCRT in patients with stage III unresectable NSCLC. The results need to be confirmed by a large-sample trial. This clinical trial was registered on www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03743129). Registration date: 6 September 2018.

Effective Treatment of Anlotinib Combined With Chemotherapy in Children With Desmoplastic Small Round Cell Tumor: A Case Series in a Single-center and Literature Review

INTRODUCTION

Desmoplastic small round cell tumor (DSRCT) is a highly aggressive primitive sarcoma with a 5-year survival rate estimated at only 15% to 30%. Although few curative treatment options exist, patients are most often treated with a combination of aggressive chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery. Targeted therapy inhibitors of platelet-derived growth factor A, insulin-like growth factor receptor 1, and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2, which are almost uniformly overexpressed in DSRCT, have largely failed in clinical trials. Anlotinib is a multitarget receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor that inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1-3, fibroblast growth factor receptor 1-4, platelet-derived growth factor receptor α/β, c-Kit, and Met. In this study, we presented 3 cases of DSRCT treated effectively with anlotinib combined with chemotherapy.

CASE PRESENTATION

Three children DSRCT patients were enrolled from September 2020 to December 2021 and monitored until August 30, 2022. The clinical data were prospectively studied. The peritoneal cancer index classified all 3 patients as stage IV. After surgery, all 3 patients received anlotinib in combination with chemotherapy and reacted to the medication. For all 3 patients, clinical symptoms were substantially eased, and the size of the masses was reduced. Patient 1 and patient 3's progression-free survival had been extended, and anlotinib was continued as a maintenance medication in the 2 patients who were in good health at the end of the follow-up. Patient 2 died of postoperative complications 1 month after second-stage surgery. The main side effects of anlotinib were fatigue and hypertension. However, its toxicity was controllable and tolerable in children patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first report that anlotinib is effective in children with DSRCT. This report may provide an additional option for the treatment of metastatic DSRCT.

Anlotinib alone or in combination with bevacizumab in the treatment of recurrent high-grade glioma: a prospective single-arm, open-label phase II trial

BACKGROUND

Anlotinib is a multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR), platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR), fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR), and c-Kit. This phase II study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of anlotinib, either alone or in combination with bevacizumab (Bev) for recurrent high-grade glioma (rHGG) (NCT04822805, 30/03/2021).

METHODS

Eligible patients had a histological diagnosis of rHGG with first or subsequent recurrences. All patients received oral anlotinib 12 mg or 10 mg on days 1-14 (repeated every 21 days). In cases where brain magnetic resonance imaging examination revealed an increase in peritumoral edema without worsening of symptoms, patients received a temporary treatment of intravenous bevacizumab 10 mg/kg to alleviate edema. The primary endpoint was the median progression-free survival (mPFS), and the secondary endpoints included median overall survival (mOS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients with rHGG were included in the efficacy and safety assessments. Eighteen patients received anlotinib alone, and seven patients received anlotinib in combination with Bev. For all patients, the mPFS and mOS were 5.0 months and 13.6 months, respectively. The ORR was 32%, and the DCR was 96%. It is noteworthy that the survival and response data of recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM) exhibit similarities to those of rHGG. For rGBM patients, there were no significant differences in mPFS, mOS, ORR, or DCR between the anlotinib alone and anlotinib + Bev groups. However, the incidence of treatment-related adverse events of any grade was higher in the anlotinib + Bev group compared to the anlotinib alone group (100% vs. 78%, p = 0.041).

CONCLUSIONS

Both anlotinib alone and its combination with Bev demonstrated good efficacy and safety in the treatment of rHGG.

Anlotinib as a maintenance treatment for advanced soft tissue sarcoma after first-line chemotherapy (ALTER-S006): a multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 2 trial

Background

No standard maintenance treatment has been obtained to prolong the response duration of soft tissue sarcoma (STS) after first-line chemotherapy. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anlotinib as a maintenance treatment after chemotherapy in STS.

Methods

In this multicentre, open-label, single-arm phase 2 trial, patients with advanced STS who achieved partial response or stable disease after first-line anthracycline-based chemotherapy were enrolled between April 2019 and January 2022. All patients received anlotinib as a maintenance treatment. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) of anlotinib maintenance treatment. Other endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and safety. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03890068.

Findings

At the data cut-off date (August 8, 2022), 49 patients were enrolled, including 17 with liposarcoma (35%) and 15 with leiomyosarcoma (31%). After a median follow-up of 17.1 months (IQR 9.0-27.2), the median PFS from the beginning of maintenance treatment was 9.1 months (95% CI 5.7-12.5), and the median OS was not reached, and the 1-year OS rate for anlotinib maintenance treatment was 98.0%. The best ORR and DCR were 16% (8/49, 95% CI 7-30) and 94% (46/49, 95% CI 83-99), respectively. Most of the treatment-related adverse events were grade 1-2. Of the grade 3-4 adverse events, the most common were hypertension (10%) and hand-foot syndrome reaction (6%).

Interpretation

Postchemotherapy maintenance treatment with anlotinib exhibits promising efficacy and tolerable toxicity in patients with advanced STS.

Funding

Chia Tai Tianqing Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd., the National Key Research and Development Program of China, and the National Natural Science Foundation of China.

Cardiovascular toxicity associated with the multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor anlotinib

BACKGROUND

Anlotinib, a multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has been shown to have encouraging activity against many tumors, but its cardiovascular toxicity has not been investigated specifically. We reviewed anlotinib-associated cardiovascular adverse events in patients and explored its cardiotoxicity in vitro.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all cardiovascular events in 62 patients with unresectable tumors who had taken anlotinib and mainly examined anlotinib's effects on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and blood pressure. Besides, we investigated its cardiotoxicity in Neonatal Rat Ventricular Myocytes (NRVMs).

RESULTS

All-grade hypertension was seen in 60 patients (97%), and 25 individuals (40%) developed grade 3 hypertension. Significant univariate associations for predictors of post-treatment hypertension were age (P<0.001), BMI (P=0.003), ECOG PS(P<0.001), diabetes mellitus (P=0.035), dose of anlotinib (P=0.025). Multivariate analysis suggested that age [odds ratio (OR) 1.079, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.029-1.130, P= 0.001] and BMI [OR 3.448, 95% CI: 1.410-8.433, P= 0.007] were the only significant independent predictors. No grade 3/4 left ventricular systolic dysfunction was reported. One patient (2%) had acute myocardial infarction, leading to cardiac death. In vitro, western blotting results showed that the levels of ANP, BNP, c-Myc and Cleaved Caspase3 were notably increased and cardiomyocyte apoptosis was strikingly increased in anlotinib group, as detected by TUNEL staining and Annexin V-FITC/PI flow cytometry.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study results showed that anlotinib could induce rat cardiomyocytes apoptosis. Nonetheless, anlotinib-associated cardiovascular toxicity was acceptable and manageable for patients with unresectable tumors.

Recent advances on anti-angiogenic multi-receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors in osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma

Osteosarcoma (OS) and Ewing sarcoma (ES) are the two most common types of primary bone cancer that predominantly affect the young. Despite aggressive multimodal treatment, survival has not improved significantly over the past four decades. Clinical efficacy has historically been observed for some mono-Receptor Tyrosine Kinase (RTK) inhibitors, albeit in small subsets of OS and ES patients. Clinical efficacy in larger groups of OS or ES patients was reported recently with several newer generation multi-RTK inhibitors. All these inhibitors combine a strong anti-angiogenic (VEGFRs) component with simultaneous inhibition of other key RTKs implicated in OS and ES progression (PDGFR, FGFR, KIT and/or MET). However, despite interesting clinical data, none of these agents have obtained a registration for these indications and are thus difficult to implement in routine OS and ES patient care. It is at present also unclear which of these drugs, with largely overlapping molecular inhibition profiles, would work best for which patient or subtype, and treatment resistance almost uniformly occurs. Here, we provide a critical assessment and systemic comparison on the clinical outcomes to the six most tested drugs in this field in OS and ES to date, including pazopanib, sorafenib, regorafenib, anlotinib, lenvatinib and cabozantinib. We pay special attention to clinical response evaluations in bone sarcomas and provide drug comparisons, including drug-related toxicity, to put these drugs into context for OS and ES patients, and describe how future trials utilizing anti-angiogenic multi-RTK targeted drugs could be designed to ultimately improve response rates and decrease toxicity.

Yifei Sanjie Formula or Placebo With Anlotinib as Second-Line or Above Treatment for Metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Study Protocol for a Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Randomized Pilot Study

BACKGROUND

Anlotinib is used as a third-line treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but has limited clinical benefits and several side effects, such as diarrhea and acneiform skin rash. Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) is commonly used to treat cancers in China. Chinese herbal medicines may have the potential as adjuvant therapies to reduce toxicity and improve the efficacy of treatments for NSCLC. Given the positive outcomes of basic research, we plan to evaluate whether the addition of the Chinese herbal medicine Yifei Sanjie formula (YFSJF) to anlotinib can improve the progression-free survival (PFS) of advanced NSCLC patients.

METHODS

A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel-group controlled pilot trial will be performed. Forty eligible patients will be randomized in a ratio of 1:1 to the intervention (YFSJF + anlotinib) and control (placebo + anlotinib) groups. Participants will be advised to take 12 mg/day of anlotinib on days 1 to 14 of each 21-day cycle. YFSJF or placebo will be administered (15 g twice daily) during each cycle until progression of disease (PD). The primary outcome will be progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary outcomes will be overall survival (OS), the objective response rate (ORR), and patient-reported outcomes (PRO). Tumors will be assessed based on RECIST v. 1.1 after every 2 cycles of treatment. The M. D. Anderson Symptom Inventory-Lung Cancer (MDASI-LC) will be used to evaluate PRO at baseline and weekly thereafter until PD.

DISCUSSION

This will be the first trial to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of TCM combined with anlotinib for the treatment of NSCLC. The results of this randomized controlled trial will fill a gap in the research by showing whether YFSJF combined with anlotinib can improve PFS in NSCLC patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was registered on June 8th, 2021 on Chinese Clinical Registry; registration number ChiCTR2100047143. (https://www.chictr.org.cn/index.aspx).

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine approved the study protocol (approval no.: K2020151, 2021/08/19). The study will also be supervised and managed by the Ethics Committee.

Evaluation of Anlotinib Combined with Adriamycin and Ifosfamide as Conversion Therapy for Unresectable Soft Tissue Sarcomas

(1) Background: This study investigated the safety and efficiency of adriamycin and ifosfamide combined with anlotinib (AI/AN) as a neoadjuvant conversion therapy in uSTS. (2) Methods: Patients with uSTS were eligible to receive AI/An, including adriamycin (20 mg/m²/d) and ifosfamide (3 g/m²/d) for the first to the third day combined with anlotinib (12 mg/d) for 2 weeks on/1 week off, all of which combine to comprise one cycle. Surgery was recommended after four cycles of treatment. (3) Results: A total of 28 patients were enrolled from June 2018 to December 2020. The best tumor responses included eight patients with partial responses and 20 with a stable disease. Patients with synovial sarcoma and liposarcoma had a significant decrease in the number of tumors compared with fibrosarcoma (p = 0.012; p = 0.042). The overall response rate and disease control rate were 28.57% and 100%, respectively. In total, 24 patients received surgery, while the rates of limb salvage and R0 resection were 91.67% (n = 22/24) and 87.50% (n = 21/24), respectively. Until the last follow-up visit, the mean PFS and RFS were 21.70 and 23.97 months, respectively. During drug administration, 67.87% of patients had grade ≥3 AEs. No treatment-related death occurred. (4) Conclusions: AI/AN followed by surgery showed favorable efficiency and manageable safety in patients with uSTS. A randomized controlled study with a large cohort should be performed for further investigations.

A real-world study of anlotinib combined with GS regimen as first-line treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

Anlotinib may boost the efficacy of pancreatic cancer (PC) treatment if timely added to the GS regimen (Gemcitabine, Tegafur-gimeracil-oteracil potassium); however, no data has been published. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of anlotinib in combination with the GS regimen(hereafter referred to as the A+GS regimen) in the first-line treatment of patients with unresectable or metastatic PC.

METHODS

Patients with unresectable or metastatic PC treated at Yueyang Central Hospital and Yueyang People's Hospital between October 2018 and June 2022 were enrolled in this retrospective real-world investigation. Treatment efficacy was evaluated based on the overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), disease control rate (DCR), and objective response rate (ORR), while the treatment safety was assessed by the frequency of major adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

Seventy-one patients were included in this study, 41 in the GS group and 30 in the A+GS group. The A+GS group had a longer mPFS than the GS group (12.0 months (95% CI, 6.0-18.0) and 6.0 months (95% CI, 3.0-8.1)), respectively (P = 0.005). mOS was longer in the GS+A group) when compared with the GS group (17.0 months (95%CI, 14.0-20.0) and 10.0 months (95% CI, 7.5-12.5)), respectively (P = 0.018). The GS+A group had higher ORR (50.0% vs 26.8%, P = 0.045) and DCR (83.3% vs 58.5%, P = 0.026). Furthermore, there were no grade 4-5 AEs and no treatment-related deaths, and no discernible increase in AEs in the GS+A group when compared with the GS group.

CONCLUSION

The A+GS regimen therapy holds great promise in managing treatment-naive advanced PC, except that future prospective studies with larger sample sizes and multiple centers are required to determine its efficacy and safety.

Efficacy and safety of anlotinib-based treatment in metastatic breast cancer patients

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of anlotinib-based treatment in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients with failure of standard treatment.

Methods

We collected the medical data of 56 female patients with the diagnosis of MBC and had failed the standard treatment before. These patients received at least two cycles of anlotinib-based treatment as the second-line or beyond treatment between October 2019 and April 2022 in Jiangsu Cancer Hospital. The primary endpoint of our study was progression-free survival (PFS), and it was estimated with Kaplan-Meier. The second end points were disease control rate (DCR), objective response rate (ORR), and side effects.

Results

The median PFS time of a total of 56 patients was 5.7 months (95% CI, 3.17-8.22months). The ORR and DCR was 28.6% and 71.4%, respectively. In second-line, third-line, and beyond treatment, the median PFS was 11.7 months, 8.7 months, and 4.7 months, respectively. In different subtype of breast cancer, the median PFS was 5.6 months, 5.7months, and 6.4 months in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive (HER2+), hormone receptor positive and HER2 negative (HR+/HER2-), and triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients, respectively. Most adverse effects were clinically manageable, and the most common events were platelet count decrease (35.7%), hand-foot syndrome (19.6%), diarrhea (19.6%), and fatigue (17.9%). The most common grade 3 and 4 adverse events were platelet count decrease (25.0%), diarrhea (7.1%), and oral mucositis (5.4%).

Conclusion

Anlotinib-based treatment showed good efficacy and manageable toxicity in multi-line treatment of MBC patients who failed the standard treatment.

Anlotinib in patients with relapsed or refractory thymic epithelial tumors: a study of 50 cases

The optimal pharmaceutical regimen for advanced thymic epithelial tumors (TETs) remains controversial when first-line chemotherapy fails. This retrospective study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anlotinib treatment for patients with relapsed and refractory TETs. Patients with progressive disease after failure of platinum-based chemotherapy were enrolled in this study. Anlotinib was orally taken once a day at an initial dose of 12 mg (10 mg when body weight <60 kg). The cycle was repeated every 3 weeks (2 weeks of treatment followed by 1-week rest). Objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS) were recorded as primary endpoints. There were 50 patients enrolled in this study from October 2018 to June 2021 at a median age of 50 (range 23-79) years old. Patients with thymoma and thymic carcinoma were 33 (66%) and 17 (34%), respectively. The ORR in thymoma and thymic carcinoma patients were 33% (11/33) and 41% (7/17), respectively. The median PFS (mPFS) was 7 (95% CI, 5.9-10.2) months in thymoma patients and 6 (95% CI, 4.6-9.3) months in the thymic carcinoma group. Eleven patients experienced dose reduction due to toxicities, among whom, eight patients discontinued treatment even after dose reduction. Six patients with thymoma showed myasthenia gravis deterioration during treatment, and two of them died of myasthenia gravis crisis. Anlotinib is active in patients with advanced TETs refractory to routine chemotherapy. Prescription of anlotinib to patients with myasthenia gravis should be made cautiously.

Identification of biomarkers and key pathways in synovial sarcoma cells exposed to anlotinib by integrating bioinformatics analysis and experimental validation

OBJECTIVE

To identify potential biomarkers, key pathways and modules following the exposure of synovial sarcoma (SS) cells to anlotinib.

METHODS

In the current study, we integrated multiple bioinformatics methods to identify the hub genes and key pathways associated with the effects of anlotinib treatment in SS cells. In addition, we used reverse transcription-quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) to validate the expression levels of the identified hub genes in SS cells treated with anlotinib.

RESULTS

In total, 183 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified, of which 47 were upregulated and 136 were downregulated. Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analyses showed that the DEGs were predominantly involved in cell division and cell cycle progression. A total of two modules were identified from the protein-protein interaction network using the MCODE plugin in Cytoscape, where module 1 was the most significant. By combining the results of CytoHubba analysis based on the module 1 and The Cancer Genome Atlas database, six real hub genes, cyclin (CCN) A2, kinesin family member 2C, cell division cycle 20, CCNB2, aurora kinase B and CCNB1, were identified. Subsequent GO and KEGG pathway analysis revealed that these six real hub genes were significantly associated with the cell cycle and mitosis. Finally, RT-qPCR verified that the mRNA expression levels of these six real hub genes were significantly decreased in SS cells treated with anlotinib compared with those in the control group. Altogether, our study identified biomarkers and key pathways associated with the effects of anlotinib treatment in SS cells, which may provide novel insights into the underlying mechanism of anlotinib treatment in SS.

Response to chemotherapy combined with anlotinib plus anlotinib maintenance in intra-abdominal desmoplastic small round cell tumors (IADSRCT): a case report and literature review

BACKGROUND

Intra-abdominal desmoplastic small round cell tumors (IADSRCT) are rare and aggressive neoplasia that are resistant to chemotherapy. Anlotinib is an oral multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor that also has anti-angiogenic and anti-proliferative properties. In this article, we report on a case showing effective and durable responses to chemotherapy combined with anlotinib in a young man with IADSRCT.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 27-year-old man was admitted to our hospital complaining of a palpable periumbilical mass that had been present for longer than 4 months. The diagnosis of IADSRCT was confirmed by biopsy and immunohistochemistry. An extensive unresectable metastasis was found on the initial diagnosis. The patient received six cycles of chemotherapy combined with anlotinib, and maintenance therapy with anlotinib was recommended. Hematochezia, proteinuria and hypertension were observed, however, long-term maintenance therapy was well tolerated. A partial response was observed after two cycles of combined therapy and the patient was still alive with stable disease at the time of reporting.

CONCLUSIONS

Chemotherapy combined with anlotinib plus anlotinib maintenance showed promising efficacy and manageable toxicity in the treatment of advanced IADSRCT.

Efficacy and Safety of Treating Refractory Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcoma with Anlotinib in Different Treatment Patterns

Methods

The medical data of 47 patients with refractory bone and soft tissue sarcoma, who received anlotinib from January 2019 to December 2020, were retrospectively collected. The overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were evaluated according to the solid tumor response evaluation version 1.1 standard. The progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse reactions were recorded.

Results

A total of 44 patients, including 13 with osteosarcoma and 31 with soft tissue sarcoma, were enrolled in this study. Among patients with osteosarcoma, no patients achieved complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), while seven patients (54%) had stable disease (SD). Besides, the median PFS (m-PFS) was 4.4 months, and the median OS (m-OS) was 15.7 months. Among patients with soft tissue sarcoma, the ORR and DCR were 19% and 71%, respectively. The median m-PFS was 5.4 months, and m-OS was 17.9 months. Anlotinib plus chemotherapy had a higher ORR compared with anlotinib monotherapy (6% vs. 38%, P = 0.047). The most common grade 3/4 adverse reactions were pneumothorax (5%) and pleural effusion (5%), and no treatment-related deaths occurred.

Conclusions

Anlotinib alone showed encouraging efficacy and favorable tolerability in refractory bone and soft tissue sarcoma. Anlotinib plus chemotherapy did not show a significant clinical benefit compared with anlotinib alone. Anlotinib showed better tumor control when used as first-line drug treatment in refractory bone and soft tissue sarcoma.

Gemcitabine Plus Anlotinib Is Effective and Safe Compared to Gemcitabine Plus Docetaxel in Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma

Objective

The aim of this study is to compare gemcitabine (G) plus docetaxel (D) versus G plus anlotinib (A) for advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS).

Methods

We retrospectively investigated 122 patients with locally advanced or metastatic STS who were treated with either G+D or G+A between July 2016 and October 2021 and compared the efficacy and toxicity of G+D and G+A. The primary endpoints were median progression-free survival (PFS) and the proportion of patients with grade ≥3 adverse events. We also analyzed differences in the clinical efficacy of G+D and G+A in leiomyosarcoma, and the differences in the clinical efficacy of G+D and G+A as first-line therapy.

Results

Overall, 122 patients were included (81 patients receiving G+D and 41 patients receiving G+A) with a median age of 55 years. The main histological types are leiomyosarcoma, undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma, and liposarcoma. After a median follow-up of 25 months, PFS did not differ between patients treated with G+D and those treated with G+A (median PFS: 5.8 months and 6.8 months, p = 0.39), and overall survival (OS) was similar (median OS: 14.7 vs. 13.3 months, p = 0.75) with a similar objective response rate (18.5% vs. 14.6%, p = 0.17), whereas the proportion of patients with grade ≥3 adverse events treated with G+D was significantly higher than those treated with G+A (68% vs. 44%, p &lt; 0.05). Subgroup analysis of leiomyosarcoma patients (47.5% of the patients) and first-line treatment patients (46.7% of the patients) shows that PFS was not significantly different between the two groups (LMS: median PFS: 6.5 months vs. 7.5 months, p = 0.08; first-line treatment: median PFS: 6.2 months vs. 7.1 months, p = 0.51).

Conclusion

Compared with gemcitabine plus docetaxel for advanced STS, gemcitabine plus anlotinib achieved a similar response rate on median PFS and OS, but lower toxicity. These results suggest that gemcitabine plus anlotinib may be an effective and safe strategy for advanced STS.

Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Anlotinib as a Monotherapy and Combined Therapy for Advanced Sarcoma

Objective

To analyze the effectiveness of the long-term (> 12 months) administration of anlotinib as a monotherapy or combined therapy in patients with advanced sarcomas.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted of patients with advanced sarcomas with measurable target lesions since 2018. Twenty-two of the patients had taken anlotinib regularly for > 12 months. The patients’ general information and the drug’s clinical efficacy and toxicity data were collected and statistically analyzed using RECIST 1.1 to measure the target lesions and tumor PFS time as the main endpoints. We used a swimmer plot to observe the drug’s efficacy and duration, and employed a waterfall plot to express the best treatment effect.

Results

The study included 14 male and 8 female patients, ranging in age from 14 to 75 (mean: 44.82) years. The primary diseases included alveolar soft part sarcoma, synovial sarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, and others. The metastasis sites were the lungs in fifteen cases, lymph nodes in four cases, and multiple sites in three cases. Fourteen patients had previously undergone chemotherapy. The current therapy protocol was oral anlotinib alone for nine cases, combination chemotherapy for nine cases, and combination immunotherapy (anti-PD-1) for four cases. The highest clinical efficacy was complete remission (CR) in four (18.18%) cases, partial response (PR) in five (22.73%) cases, and stable disease in 13 (59.09%) cases, with an odds ratio of response of 40.91%. The mean PFS for the CR, PR, and stable disease groups was 16.50, 14.50, and 29.31 months, respectively (p < 0.05). The main adverse effects included hand-foot syndrome, hypertension, and leukopenia.

Conclusion

Anlotinib monotherapy or combination therapy can be more effective and safer for certain advanced sarcomas, with more extended maintenance and acceptable side effects. Clinical efficacy at the CR and PR levels might predict the long-term PFS in certain advanced sarcomas.

Application of Anlotinib Combined With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Primary EWS/PNET of Lung: A Case Report

Primary pulmonary EWS/PNET(PPES) is extremely rare and is associated with a poor prognosis. Tumor angiogenesis plays an important role in tumor, so it has become a hot topic in molecular targeted therapy. Anlotinib is a new oral small molecular multi-targeted receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) inhibitor. This report describes a 20 year-old man with PPES. After 4 neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles (VACwith alternating IE) combined with anlotinib, the left total pneumonectomy was performed. Then maintenance anlotinib monotherapy was continued, no sign of recurrence to date as an outcome. To our knowledge, this is the first demonstration of anlotinib combined with neoadjuvant chemotherapy efficacy in PPES.

Retrospective Review of Efficacy and Safety of Anlotinib in Advanced Leiomyosarcoma: A Real-World Study

Objective

Retrospective study on the safety and efficacy of anlotinib in the treatment of advanced leiomyosarcoma in real-world.

Methods

Clinical data were collected from patients suffered from advanced leiomyosarcoma who received anlotinib treatment in Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences from January 2018 to December 2020. Objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were analyzed according to the RECIST 1.1 criteria. The progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and adverse reactions were recorded and calculated.

Results

A total of 19 patients (14 female, 5 male) were enrolled, 3 (15.8%) achieved partial response (PR), 11 (57.9%) achieved stable disease (SD), with an ORR of 15.8%, a DCR of 73.7%, a median PFS of 4.1 months (95% CI: 3.0~5.2) and a median OS of 23.5 months (95% CI: 14.2~32.7). The majority of adverse events were grade 1/2, the most common grade 3/4 adverse events were hand-foot syndrome (12.5%), hypertension (5.3%) and oral ulcer (5.3%).

Conclusion

Our results forecast that anlotinib is effective, safe and alternative in treatment of advanced leiomyosarcoma in real-world, combined with immunotherapy may become a potential treatment option. Further, more prospective randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these findings.

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors in sarcoma treatment (Review)

Sarcomas are a group of rare mesenchymal malignant tumors that arise from transformed cells of the mesenchymal connective tissue, which are challenging to treat. The majority of sarcomas are soft tissue sarcomas (STSs; 75%) and this heterogeneous group of tumors is further comprised of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (~15%) and bone sarcomas (10%). Although surgery remains the current primary therapeutic approach for localized disease, recurrent, metastatic and refractory sarcomas require cytotoxic chemotherapy, which usually yields poor results. Therefore the efficiency of sarcoma treatment imposes a difficult problem. Furthermore, even though progress has been made towards understanding the underlying molecular signaling pathways of sarcoma, there are limited treatment options. The aim of the present study was therefore to perform a systematic literature review of the available clinical evidence regarding the role of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in patients with recurrent or refractory STSs and bone sarcomas over the last two decades. Tyrosine kinases are principal elements of several intracellular molecular signaling pathways. Deregulation of these proteins has been implicated in driving oncogenesis via the crosstalk of pivotal cellular signaling pathways and cascades, including cell proliferation, migration, angiogenesis and apoptosis. Subsequently, small molecule TKIs that target these proteins provide a novel potential therapeutic approach for several types of tumor by offering significant clinical benefits. Among the eligible articles, there were 45 prospective clinical trials, primarily multicentric, single arm, phase II and non-randomized. Numerous studies have reported promising results regarding the use of TKIs, mainly resulting in disease control in patients with STSs. The lack of randomized clinical trials demonstrates the ambiguous efficiency of various studied treatment options, which therefore currently limits the approved drugs used in clinical practice. Research both in clinical and preclinical settings is needed to shed light on the underlying molecular drivers of sarcomagenesis and will identify novel therapeutic approaches for pretreated patients.

Case Report: Complete Remission With Anti-PD-1 and Anti-VEGF Combined Therapy of a Patient With Metastatic Primary Splenic Angiosarcoma

Primary splenic angiosarcoma (PSA) is a rare malignancy with poor prognosis. At present, little study is available on immunotherapy in PSA. Here, we report a case of a patient with metastatic PSA who was treated with programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) tyrosine kinase inhibitors combined therapy and achieved complete response (CR). The patient was a 57−year−old woman with three liver metastases. She was treated with seven cycles of toripalimab plus anlotinib. Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) immunohistochemistry and next-generation sequencing was performed, and the PD-L1 tumor proportion score was 75%. Finally, she achieved CR after six cycles of the combined therapy regimen. No serious adverse events were detected. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first clinical evidence that anti-PD-1 plus anti-VEGF therapy might be a promising option for patients with metastatic PSA. However, more clinical trials are needed to verify this conclusion.

Systemic Treatment of Ewing Sarcoma: Current Options and Future Perspectives

Ewing sarcoma (ES) is an uncommon malignant neoplasm, mostly affecting young adults and adolescents. Surgical excision, irradiation, and combinations of multiple chemotherapeutic agents are currently used as a multimodal strategy for the treatment of local and oligometastatic disease. Although ES usually responds to the primary treatment, relapsed and primarily refractory disease remains a difficult therapeutic challenge. The growing understanding of cancer biology and the subsequent development of new therapeutic strategies have been put at the service of research in recurrent and refractory ES, generating a great number of ongoing studies with compounds that could find superior clinical outcomes in the years to come. This review gathers the current available information on the treatment and clinical investigation of ES and aims to be a point of support for future research.

Epithelioid sarcoma: A single-institutional retrospective cohort study of 36 cases

BACKGROUND

Few studies have focused on the correlation between the clinical variables and the survival in Epithelioid Sarcoma (ES). The aim of this study was to investigate the relevant clinical variables influencing the survival of ES patients.

METHODS

From March 2000 to April 2018, 36 patients (median age, 38 years, range 22-61 years) with ES were evaluated, treated, and followed up.

RESULTS

All 36 patients underwent resection in our hospital. Among them, the 2 and 5 years local recurrence rates were 32.0% and 45.1%, respectively, with a better prognosis in patients with R0 resection margin. Distant metastasis rates for the 33 patients with M0 after 2 and 5 years were 51.5% and 70.8%, respectively. Overall survival rates at 2 and 5 years for 36 patients were 74.8% and 43.3%, respectively. Tumor size (>5 cm) and M1 were significantly associated with a poor overall survival. But the R0 resection margin was the only prognostic factor for influencing the LRFS and DMFS.

CONCLUSIONS

The R0 resection margin and small tumor size were critical for a better prognosis.

Therapeutic potential of indole alkaloids in respiratory diseases: A comprehensive review

BACKGROUND

Indole alkaloids are very promising for potential therapeutic purposes and appear to be particularly effective against respiratory diseases. Several experimental studies have been performed, both in vivo and in vitro, to evaluate the effectiveness of indole alkaloids for the management of respiratory disorders, including asthma, emphysema, tuberculosis, cancer, and pulmonary fibrosis.

PURPOSE

The fundamental objective of this review was to summarize the in-depth therapeutic potential of indole alkaloids against various respiratory disorders.

STUDY DESIGN

In addition to describing the therapeutic potential, this review also evaluates the toxicity of these alkaloids, which have been utilized for therapeutic benefits but have demonstrated toxic consequences. Some indole alkaloids, including scholaricine, 19-epischolaricine, vallesamine, and picrinine, which are derived from the plant Alstonia scholaris, have shown toxic effects in non-rodent models.

METHODS

This review also discusses clinical studies exploring the therapeutic efficacy of indole alkaloids, which have confirmed the promising benefits observed in vivo and in vitro.

RESULTS

The indole alkaloidal compounds have shown efficacy in subjects with respiratory diseases.

CONCLUSION

The available data established both preclinical and clinical studies confirm the potential of indole alkaloids to treat the respiratory disorders.

The timing of targeted therapy initiation in metastatic sarcoma as an adjuvant to first-line chemotherapy or a second-line agent

58 cases of metastatic sarcoma were reviewed retrospectively in order to compare the efficacy and safety of concurrent (n=24, group A) versus sequential (n=34, group B) use of chemotherapy and targeted therapy in metastatic sarcoma. Progression-free survival (PFS) 1 was defined as the duration between initiation of first-line treatment to disease progression or recurrence. PFS' was defined as the duration between initiation of first-line treatment to the failure of chemotherapy and targeted therapy, and overall survival (OS) was defined as the duration between initiation of first-line treatment to the date of last follow-up or death. The results revealed that patients in group A possessed a higher tumor burden compared to those in group B (P=0.049). Survival curves revealed that the median PFS1 (15.2 vs. 5.4 months, P=0.000), median PFS' (15.2 vs. 10.8 months, P=0.049), and median OS (42.3 vs. 25.3 months, P=0.041) of subjects in group A were remarkably longer than those of group B. Subgroup analysis showed that patients in group A experienced more favorable PFS1 (15.2 vs. 3 months, P=0.000), PFS' (15.2 vs. 5.8 months, P=0.003), and OS (35.2 vs. 15.7 months, P=0.011) than those in group B, with findings especially prominent in patients with tumor burden ≥ 10 cm in comparison to patients with tumor burden < 10 cm (P ≥ 0.05). All grades of leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, fatigue, and oral mucositis were more frequently diagnosed in patients of group A compared to those of group B. However, there were no significant differences between the rates of Grade 3-4 adverse events between the two groups. This investigation suggests that the concurrent use of targeted therapy and chemotherapy may be useful and safe as a first-line treatment in patients with metastatic sarcoma who possess a high tumor burden.

Retrospective Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Anlotinib Combined With Dose-Dense Temozolomide in Patients With Recurrent Glioblastoma

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to retrospectively analyze the safety and clinical efficacy of anlotinib combined with dose-dense temozolomide (TMZ) as the first-line therapy in the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM).

Patients and Methods

We collected the clinical data of 20 patients with rGBM. All patients received anlotinib (12 mg daily, orally for 2 weeks, discontinued for 1 week, repeated every 3 weeks) combined with dose-dense TMZ (100 mg/m², 7 days on with 7 days off) until the disease progressed (PD) or adverse effects (AEs) above grade 4 appeared. Grade 3 AEs need to be restored to grade 2 before continuing treatment, and the daily dose of anlotinib is reduced to 10 mg. The patients were reexamined by head magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) every 1 to 3 months. The therapeutic effect was evaluated according to Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria. The survival rate was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis. The baseline of all survival index statistics was the start of anlotinib combined with dose-dense of TMZ. National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria Adverse Events version 4.0 (NCI-CTCAE 4.0) was used to evaluate AEs.

Results

Twenty cases of rGBM were evaluated according to the RANO criteria after treatment with anlotinib and dose-dense TMZ, including five cases of stable disease (SD), thirteen cases of partial response (PR), one case of complete response (CR), and one case of PD. The median follow-up time was 13.4 (95% CI, 10.5–16.3) months. The 1-year overall survival (OS) rate was 47.7%. The 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 55%. In the IDH wild type group, the median PFS and median OS were 6.1 and 11.9 months, respectively. We observed that AEs associated with treatment were tolerable. One patient stopped taking the drug because of cerebral infarction. There were no treatment-related deaths.

Conclusion

Anlotinib combined with dose-dense TMZ for the first-line therapy showed good efficacy in OS, PFS, ORR, and DCR in the treatment of rGBM, and the AEs were tolerant. Randomized controlled clinical trials investigating the treatment of rGBM with anlotinib are necessary.

Apatinib with doxorubicin and ifosfamide as neoadjuvant therapy for high-risk soft tissue sarcomas: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

There is a need to establish an effective neoadjuvant therapy for soft tissue sarcomas (STSs). We previously showed that apatinib, administered in combination with doxorubicin-based chemotherapy, improves the efficacy of treatment. This study aimed to clarify the effectiveness and safety of apatinib combined with doxorubicin and ifosfamide (AI) neoadjuvant chemotherapy for STSs.

METHODS

This retrospective study included patients with STS who received neoadjuvant therapy and surgery between January 2016 and January 2019. The patients were divided into two treatment groups: AI + apatinib group and AI group (doxorubicin + ifosfamide).

RESULTS

The study included 74 patients (AI + apatinib: 26, AI: 48) with STS. There were significant between-group differences in objective response rates (53.85% vs. 29.17%, p = 0.047) and the average change in target lesion size from baseline (-40.46 ± 40.30 vs. -16.31 ± 34.32, p = 0.008). The R0 rate (84.62% vs. 68.75%; p = 0.170) and 2-year disease-free survival (73.08% vs. 62.50%, p = 0.343) were similar across groups. Finally, the rates of neoadjuvant therapy-related adverse effects and postoperative complications were similar in both groups (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Apatinib plus doxorubicin and ifosfamide regimen is safe and effective as neoadjuvant therapy for patients with STS. However, the significantly improved preoperative ORR observed after neoadjuvant therapy did not translate into a significantly improved R0 rate and 2-year DFS. Prospective, well-powered studies are warranted to determine the long-term efficacy and optimal application of these protocols.

Anlotinib: A Novel Targeted Drug for Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcoma

Bone and soft tissue sarcomas account for approximately 15% of pediatric solid malignant tumors and 1% of adult solid malignant tumors. There are over 50 subtypes of sarcomas, each of which is notably heterogeneous and manifested by remarkable phenotypic and morphological variability. Anlotinib is a novel oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) targeting c-kit, platelet-derived growth factor receptors, fibroblast growth factor receptor, and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor. In comparison with the placebo, anlotinib was associated with better overall survival and progression-free survival (PFS) in a phase III trial of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), albeit with cancer progression after two previous lines of treatment. Recently, the National Medical Products Administration approved anlotinib monotherapy as a third-line treatment for patients with advanced NSCLC. Additionally, a phase IIB randomized trial substantiated that anlotinib is associated with a significant longer median PFS in patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma. Moreover, anlotinib is also effective in patients with advanced medullary thyroid carcinoma and metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Anlotinib has similar tolerability to other TKIs targeting vascular endothelial growth factor receptors and other tyrosine kinase-mediated pathways. However, anlotinib has a notably lower rate of side effects ≥grade 3 relative to sunitinib. This review discussed the remarkable characteristics and major dilemmas of anlotinib as a targeted therapy for sarcomas.

Toward a Personalized Therapy in Soft-Tissue Sarcomas: State of the Art and Future Directions

Soft-tissue sarcomas are rare tumors characterized by pathogenetic, morphological, and clinical intrinsic variability. Median survival of patients with advanced tumors are usually chemo- and radio-resistant, and standard treatments yield low response rates and poor survival results. The identification of defined genomic alterations in sarcoma could represent the premise for targeted treatments. Summarizing, soft-tissue sarcomas can be differentiated into histotypes with reciprocal chromosomal translocations, with defined oncogenic mutations and complex karyotypes. If the latter are improbably approached with targeted treatments, many suggest that innovative therapies interfering with the identified fusion oncoproteins and altered pathways could be potentially resolutive. In most cases, the characteristic genetic signature is discouragingly defined as "undruggable", which poses a challenge for the development of novel pharmacological approaches. In this review, a summary of genomic alterations recognized in most common soft-tissue sarcoma is reported together with current and future therapeutic opportunities.

In vitro studies of H520 cell cycle and apoptosis by anlotinib combined with radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

To study in vitro the effects of anlotinib combined with radiotherapy on the lung cancer H520 cell cycle and apoptosis.

METHODS

The log growth period H520 cells were divided into the control group, anlotinib group (A group), radiotherapy group (RT group) and combined group (A + RT group). Cell cycle and apoptosis were detected by flow cytometry and changes in H520 cell cycle and apoptosis were analyzed in each group.

RESULTS

Anlotinib was determined to significantly inhibit cell growth in all groups, both alone, or in combination with radiotherapy. After receiving corresponding treatments, the proportions of G2/M-phase cells in the control group, A group, RT group and A + RT group were different, and statistically significant (F = 32.086, P < 0.001). The apoptotic cell statistics of H520 cells in the control group, A group, RT group and A + RT group were significantly different (F = 44.537, P < 0.01). The relative expression of CDK1 in each group of cells was 0.04 ± 0.02, 0.07 ± 0.12, 0.81 ± 0.11, and 0.56 ± 0.16, respectively. There were differences between the groups by analysis of variance which were statistically significant (F = 58.36, P < 0.0001). The relative expression of cycle B in each group of cells was 0.27 ± 0.05, 0.40 ± 0.16, 0.65 ± 0.14, and 0.57 ± 0.13, respectively. There were differences between the groups by analysis of variance which were statistically significant (F = 10.77, P = 0.0002).

CONCLUSIONS

Anlotinib had an inhibitory effect on lung cancer H520 cell proliferation. A higher rate of apoptosis and G2/M phase block was observed in the anlotinib-radiotherapy combined group. Anlotinib combined with radiotherapy was able to synergistically inhibit tumor cell growth.

KEY POINTS

Anrotinib combined with radiotherapy can synergistically inhibit tumor cell growth.

Application of neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with anlotinib in occult breast cancer: A case report and review of literature

BACKGROUND

Occult breast cancer (OBC) is a special type of breast cancer presenting as axillary lymph node metastasis with undetectable primary lesions in the breast. Due to its low incidence and unique clinical manifestations, there is a lack of consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of OBC. We report a case of OBC treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with anlotinib. The treatment was well tolerated, and the patient achieved a pathologic complete response.

CASE SUMMARY

A 53-year-old woman presented with a lump in her right axillary area with no primary lesions in the breast. Pathological biopsy confirmed right axillary metastatic carcinoma. Immunohistochemical staining results were positive for progesterone receptor, cytokeratin 7, specific breast markers GATA3 and gross cystic disease fluid protein-15. Tumor cells were negative for estrogen receptor, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2, cytokeratin 5/6, cytokeratin 20, and villin. The patient was diagnosed with OBC, and she underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with anlotinib. Mastectomy plus axillary lymph node dissection was performed. The patient achieved pathologic complete response with no residual invasive tumor cells in the breast or axillary lymph nodes. Postoperatively, she received adjuvant radiotherapy and endocrine therapy.

CONCLUSION

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and anlotinib had good efficacy and safety in the treatment of OBC and may be a new therapeutic option.

Nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus nivolumab in individuals with treatment-naive programmed death-ligand 1 positive metastatic soft tissue sarcomas: a multicentre retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Currently, the choice of treatment for individuals with metastatic soft tissue sarcomas (MSTS) presents a significant challenge to clinicians. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the efficacy and safety of nivolumab plus ipilimumab (NPI) versus nivolumab alone (NIV) in individuals with treatment-naive programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) positive MSTS.

METHODS

Prospectively maintained databases were reviewed from 2013 to 2018 to assess individuals with treatment-naive PD-L1 MSTS who received NPI (nivolumab 3 mg/kg and ipilimumab 1 mg/kg every 3 weeks for 4 doses followed by nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks) or NIV (3 mg/kg every 2 weeks) until disease progression, withdrawal, unendurable [AEs], or death. The co-primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 16.0 months (IQR 14.4-18.5) after targeted intervention. The median OS was 12.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.1-13.7) and 9.2 months (95% CI, 4.2-11.5) for the NPI and NIV groups, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] 0.49, 95% CI, 0.33-0.73; p=0.0002); the median PFS was 4.1 months (95% CI, 3.2-4.5) and 2.2 months (95% CI, 1.1-3.4) for the NPI and NIV groups, respectively (HR 0.51, 95% CI, 0.36-0.71; p< 0.0001). Key grade 3-5 AEs occurred more frequently in the NPI group than in the NIV group (94 [72.9%] for NPI vs. 35 [27.1%], p< 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

For treatment-naive PD-L1 positive MSTS, NPI seems to be less tolerated but has a greater survival advantage than NIV as the primary therapy.

Efficacy and safety of anlotinib in patients with unresectable or metastatic well-differentiated/dedifferentiated liposarcoma: a single-center retrospective study

Treatment options for unresectable local recurrence or metastatic well-differentiated/dedifferentiated liposarcoma (WDLS/DDLS) remain limited. Different liposarcoma subtypes have varying clinical features and sensitivities to treatment regimens. The multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), such as pazopanib and regorafenib, have been approved for use in nonadipocytic soft tissue sarcomas (STS). Anlotinib, another TKI, has been approved in China for treating metastatic STS that has progressed after the use of anthracycline-based regimens. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the role of anlotinib in the treatment of local recurrence or metastatic WDLS/DDLS. From August 2018 to June 2020, 17 patients with unresectable local recurrence or metastatic WDLS/DDLS treated with anlotinib in our center were included. The follow-up cutoff time was set as 20 October 2020. Baseline and observation indicators were collected and analyzed. Estimated median progression-free survival (PFS) was 27.9 weeks, the PFS rate at 24 weeks was 58.8%, overall survival (OS) was 56.6 weeks, the disease control rate was 64.7% and no complete response or partial response was detected. Grade 3/4 adverse events occurred in four cases and could be managed. Anlotinib is a potential treatment option for unresectable local recurrence or metastatic WDLS/DDLS.

The Activity and Safety of Anlotinib for Patients with Extremity Desmoid Fibromatosis: A Retrospective Study in a Single Institution

Purpose

Desmoid fibromatosis (DF) is an aggressive fibroblastic neoplasm with a high propensity for local recurrence. Although multiple therapeutic modalities seem effective for DF, the standard systemic treatment for symptomatic and progressive DF remains controversial. As targeted therapy, tyrosine kinase inhibitors have been recently reported to contribute to the treatment of DF. Thus, the purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of anlotinib, a novel multi-kinase angiogenesis inhibitor, in patients with DF.

Patients and Methods

We retrospectively collected the clinical medical records of patients with extremity DF who received anlotinib between January 2019 and January 2020 in our center. Anlotinib was started with a dose of 8 mg daily and adjusted according to the drug-related toxicity. Tumor response was assessed by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1 criteria. Progression-free survival (PFS) was identified as the primary endpoint and analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier method.

Results

In total, 21 (6 male, 15 female) consecutive patients with DF were enrolled. The median medication time was nine months (Q1, Q3: 7.5, 10.5). None of the patients achieved a complete response, but eight (38.1%) patients achieved a partial response and ten patients (47.6%) achieved disease stability. Three (14%) patients developed progressive disease and the 3-, 6-, and 12-month PFS rates were 95.2%, 90.5%, and 84.0%, respectively. The disease control rate was 86.0% (18/21) and the objective response rate was 38.1% (8/21). Moreover, 15/21 (71.4%) patients achieved a reduction in tumor size, accompanied with a decrease in T2-weighted signal intensity on magnetic resonance imaging and clinical benefit.

Conclusion

Anlotinib was effective against DF with an acceptable safety profile, and significantly slowed the disease progression. Further, multicenter studies with a longer follow-up time are needed to characterize fully the clinical application of anlotinib in DF.

Switch maintenance therapy with anlotinib after chemotherapy in unresectable or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma: a single-center retrospective study

Background Chemotherapy is an important first-line treatment option in patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS). Whether maintenance therapy improves survival after chemotherapy is still controversial. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the data of 21 adults diagnosed with unresectable or metastatic STS between May 2018 and September 2019 in our center. They achieved an objective response or stable disease after chemotherapy and then received at least one cycle of switch maintenance therapy with anlotinib, a novel multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor. The objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), adverse events, and median progression-free survival (PFS) after anlotinib maintenance (PFSa), and the median PFS after chemotherapy (PFSc) were analyzed. Results Nineteen patients received first-line chemotherapy and 2 received second-line chemotherapy. Five patients achieved a partial response and 16 had stable disease after chemotherapy. The median number of anlotinib maintenance cycles was five (range, 2-31). One patient achieved a complete response and two patients exhibited a partial response during anlotinib maintenance, with an ORR of 14.3%. The DCR was 81.0%. After a median follow-up of 14.0 months, the median PFSa and PFSc were 7.3 and 13.6 months, respectively. Grade 3/4 adverse events occurred in six (28.6%) patients and were managed through symptomatic treatment, dose reduction or anlotinib discontinuance. Conclusion Our results indicate that switch maintenance therapy with anlotinib is a promising strategy for the treatment of patients with unresectable or metastatic STS who have benefited from chemotherapy. Toxicities were manageable. Prospective clinical trials are needed to confirm this finding.

Hypertensive Retinopathy Secondary to Anlotinib Treatment

Purpose

We report a case of a middle-aged woman who developed hypertensive retinopathy following oral administration of Anlotinib.

Observations

A 48-year-old woman presented to our hospital with sudden painless loss of vision in both eyes combined with headache, nausea, and vomiting following oral administration of Anlotinib. This drug is often used to control cancer progression. Due to the deterioration of her blood pressure, which reached 167/113 mm Hg, Anlotinib was discontinued and the blood pressure was controlled by hypertension medications. This normalized her blood pressure, alleviated headache, and restored her vision. She visited our eye department 37 days later for eye check-up. The best-corrected visual acuities was 0.3 in the right eye and 0.4 in the left eye. The fundus examinations revealed a clear boundary of the optic papilla with significant stellate exudation in the macular area. The posterior pole of the retina displayed high hemorrhage, with a cotton-wool spot appearance. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) revealed atrophy in the outer segment of macular area, and hard exudations in retinal layers. Based on these findings, hypertensive retinopathy was diagnosed, as a secondary complication of Anlotinib.

Conclusions and Significance

Anlotinib can induce hypertensive retinopathy. Patients receiving this drug should be closely monitored for potential complications.

A Trial of the Safety and Efficacy of Chemotherapy Plus Anlotinib vs Chemotherapy Alone as Second- or Third-Line Salvage Treatment for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Purpose

Anlotinib is a newly developed oral multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor. We retrospectively evaluated the toxicity and clinical efficacy of chemotherapy combined with anlotinib versus chemotherapy alone for metastatic/advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in patients who failed first- or second-line systemic treatment in China.

Patients and Methods

In this retrospective trial, ninety-four advanced NSCLC patients received chemotherapy combined with anlotinib (n = 41) or chemotherapy alone (n = 53) in Henan Cancer Hospital. We recorded the objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS) and adverse events (AEs).

Results

In the anlotinib plus chemotherapy group, eleven patients (27%) achieved a PR (partial response), and twenty-one patients (51%) achieved SD (stable disease), with an ORR of 27% and a DCR of 78%. In the chemotherapy alone group, eight patients (15%) achieved a PR, and nineteen patients (36%) had SD, with an ORR of 15% and a DCR of 51%. The ORR in the combination arm was slightly, but not obviously, higher than that in the chemotherapy arm (27% vs 15%, p > 0.05). In addition, the DCR was significantly higher in the combination arm than in the chemotherapy alone arm (78% vs 51%, p=0.007). At the end of follow-up, patients in the combination arm had a 1.5-month longer median PFS than patients in the chemotherapy arm; this difference was statistically significant (5.0 vs 3.5, p=0.002). The median OS was not achieved at the final analysis. The hematological and nonhematological toxicities were well tolerated and controlled. In general, most toxicity was limited to grade I or II, well tolerated and controlled.

Conclusion

Our study suggests that anlotinib combined with chemotherapy may be an effective and well-tolerated treatment for advanced NSCLC in patients who fail first- or second-line therapy.