Paliperidone palmitate injection for the acute and maintenance treatment of schizophrenia in adults

Nanocrystals for controlled delivery: State of the art and approved drug products

INTRODUCTION

Controlled/extended-release formulations offer numerous benefits over conventional especially reduced side effects, improved therapeutic outcomes and high patient compliance. Controlled release nanocrystal is extremely versatile technology with several advantages such as very high drug loading, ease of manufacturing, avoidance of dose dumping, reproducible drug release. Usually, nanonization of drug is performed to improve dissolution rate, intrinsic solubility and thereby bioavailability. Most of the times, this is done for immediate release dosage forms where objective is quick onset of action. However, nanocrystals can also provide a sustained, reproducible plasma concentration profile for weeks to months based on tissue microenvironment, surface coating administration route.

AREAS COVERED

This review briefly describes the methods for producing nanocrystals, summarizes preclinical research and commercial products demonstrating tremendous potential of controlled release nanocrystals.

EXPERT OPINION

Lipophilic drugs are attractive candidates for the development of nanocrystal based controlled release formulations. However, constraint should be practiced while generalizing the technology for the controlled release purpose. Not all drugs fit in the requirement from the perspectives of physicochemical properties or pharmacokinetic requirements. Additionally, technologies should be explored which can convert the nanocrystal into its final dosage form for administration yet preserves the benefits of small particle size and controlled release.

Comparison and predictors of treatment adherence and remission among patients with schizophrenia treated with paliperidone palmitate or atypical oral antipsychotics in community behavioral health organizations

BACKGROUND

Nonadherence to antipsychotic treatment increases the likelihood of relapse and progressive symptomatology in patients with schizophrenia. Atypical long-acting injectables, including paliperidone palmitate (PP), may increase adherence and improve symptoms. This study compared and assessed predictors of treatment patterns and symptom remission among schizophrenia patients treated with PP versus atypical oral antipsychotic therapy (OAT) in community behavioral health organizations (CBHOs).

METHODS

This retrospective cohort analysis evaluated 763 patients with schizophrenia and new (PP-N; N = 174) or continuing (PP-C; N = 308) users of PP, or new users of OAT (N = 281) at enrollment in the REACH-OUT study (2010-2013). Treatment outcomes assessed at 1 year were discontinuation, and adherence, measured by proportion of days covered (PDC) or medication possession ratio (MPR). Remission status was assessed using the Structured Clinical Interview for Symptoms of Remission (SCI-SR). A machine learning platform, Reverse Engineering and Forward Simulation (REFS™), was used to identify predictors of study outcomes. Multivariate Cox and generalized linear regressions estimated the adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) or odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

Among PP-N users, 27% discontinued their initial treatment regimen versus 51% (p < 0.001) of OAT users. PP-N (vs OAT; HR = 0.49 [0.31-0.76]) users and males (HR = 0.65 [0.46-0.92]) had significantly lower rates of discontinuation. Relative to OAT, PP-N had a 36% [31%-42%] higher MPR and a 10-fold increased achievement of PDC ≥80% (OR = 10.46 [5.72-19.76]). PP users were significantly more likely to achieve remission in follow-up (PP-N vs OAT: OR = 2.65 [1.39-5.05]; PP-C vs OAT: OR = 1.83 [1.03-3.25]).

CONCLUSIONS

Relative to OAT, PP was associated with improved adherence, less frequent treatment discontinuation, and improved symptom remission in this CBHO study population.

Cost-Minimisation Analysis of Paliperidone Palmitate Long-Acting Treatment versus Risperidone Long-Acting Treatment for Schizophrenia in Spain

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Long-acting formulations for paliperidone (PPLAT) and risperidone (RLAT) are effective second-generation antipsychotics. This study aimed to compare treatment costs between PPLAT and RLAT in schizophrenia patients.

METHODS

A cost-minimization analysis was performed from the perspective of the Spanish National Healthcare System (NHS), in line with the approach accepted by the Scottish Medicine Consortium evaluation. Only direct health costs (€, 2015) were included, i.e. medication (including oral antipsychotic drug supplementation), hospitalization and cost of administration in the community. Two time horizons were used: 1 year (to compare initiation treatment) and 2 years (to compare maintenance treatment). Base-case considered the following assumptions: setting for treatment initiation (50 % hospital and 50 % community); 50 % of patients initiating from a long-acting treatment and 50 % from an oral antipsychotic; no reduction in the length of stay. One-way sensitivity analyses (SA) were performed.

RESULTS

The estimated costs/patient were €7698 (PPLAT) and €8168 (RLAT) for the first year, and €4314 (PPLAT) and €5003 (RLAT) for the second year. Cost savings related to PPLAT therapy were €470 and €689 for first and second year, respectively. SA results confirmed the robustness of the model results, even in the most conservative scenarios: (1) if 100 % of patients initiate treatment in hospital, the savings could be €454 per patient; (2) if 100 % of patients initiate treatment from an oral antipsychotic, the savings could be €277 per patient/year; and (3) if PPLAT could not reduce the length of stay by approximately one-third, as some studies indicate, the savings could be €470 per patient/year.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of PPLAT instead of RLAT could be a cost-saving strategy for the Spanish NHS.

Paliperidone Palmitate Treatment in Outpatient Care Setting: A Naturalistic Study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate paliperidone palmitate (PP) effectiveness, safety and adherence to treatment.

METHODS

We collected data of all patients (n = 50) affected by Schizophrenia Disorders, treated with PP for a 3 month minimum period in the outpatient setting of Mental Health Department in Modena, from 01/01/2014 to 31/01/2015. We evaluated reasons and modality for PP implementation, improvement in symptom and functioning scales, adverse effects, discontinuations and relapses. We statistically correlated socio-demographic and clinical variables of our sample with PP therapeutic variables.

RESULTS

We registered an improvement in all scales, with a superior percentage in PANSS positive subscale. The mean PP dose in some patients was lower than official indications, although our sample was clinically severe. Illness relapses affected 60% and dropout 18% of patients. PP was well tolerated and in just a few cases adverse events required treatment interruption. The risk factors for discontinuation were represented by "lack of therapeutic compliance" (HR = 4.11, p < 0.0001) and "inefficacy" (HR = 1.67, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

With limitations of observational design, this research highlights that PP was well tolerated and effective in improving both psychotic symptoms and functioning, but moderately effective in preventing relapse, probably due to clinical severity of our patients associated with extremely cautious and flexible PP prescriptions.

The role of long-acting injectable antipsychotics in schizophrenia: a critical appraisal

Despite their widespread use, long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotics (APs) are often regarded with some negativity because of the assumption of punishment, control and insufficient evolution towards psychosocial development of patients. However, LAI APs have proved effective in schizophrenia and other severe psychotic disorders because they assure stable blood levels, leading to a reduction of the risk of relapse. Therapeutic opportunities have also arisen after introduction of newer, second-generation LAI APs in recent years. Newer LAI APs are more readily dosed optimally, may be better tolerated and are better suited to integrated rehabilitation programmes. This review outlines the older and newer LAI APs available for the treatment of schizophrenia, with considerations of past and present pharmacological and therapeutic issues. Traditional, evidence-based approaches to systematic reviews and randomized clinical trials are of limited utility in this area so this paper's blending of experimental trials with observational research is particularly appropriate and effective.