Improving Adherence to Topical Medication in Patients with Glaucoma

Contact allergy to topical ophthalmic medications: A retrospective single-centre study of three decades

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of contact allergy to various ophthalmic medications appears to be rare; however, data on culprits, clinical relevance of sensitizations, and changes in frequency within recent decades are limited.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the clinical relevance, risk factors, and prevalence of contact allergy to topical ophthalmic medications in patients suspected of allergic contact dermatitis to ophthalmic medication.

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed patch test results and clinical data for 754 patients patch-tested with an ophthalmic medication series at our tertiary referral centre between January 1992 and December 2022.

RESULTS

In total, 37.5% (283/754) of patch-tested patients had a contact allergy to at least one ophthalmic allergen, with 87.3% (247) being clinically relevant sensitization. Phenylephrine (31.8%, 192/604), povidone-iodine (29%, 27/93), and tobramycin (23%, 46/200) were the most important sensitizers. The incidence of contact allergies increased significantly in a linear manner (p = 0.008) from 20% to 44.1% within the study period. Male sex and age above 40 were risk factors for contact allergy to ophthalmic medication.

CONCLUSIONS

One third of patch tested patients had allergic contact dermatitis to ophthalmic medication, particularly phenylephrine. Male sex and age above 40 years were independent risk factors and drove the linear increase in contact allergy to ophthalmic medications within the past 31 years.

Travoprost Intracameral Implant Demonstrates Superior IOP Lowering Versus Topical Prostaglandin Analog Monotherapy in Patients with Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension

INTRODUCTION

This study was conducted to analyze and compare the intraocular pressure (IOP) treatment effect of the slow-eluting (SE) travoprost intracameral implant to the IOP treatment effect of topical prostaglandin analog (PGA) monotherapy in a subgroup of subjects who were on pre-study PGA monotherapy prior to enrollment in the two pivotal phase 3 trials of the travoprost intracameral implant.

METHODS

A combined study population of 133 subjects from two phase 3 trials, who were on topical PGA monotherapy at screening, subsequently underwent a washout period from their topical PGA, and then were randomized and administered an SE travoprost intracameral implant. The subjects were analyzed for the IOP treatment effects of the pre-study topical PGA monotherapy and the in-study SE travoprost intracameral implant. Paired t-tests were used to compare the difference in screening minus post-washout baseline IOP versus month 3 minus post-washout baseline IOP. The IOP-lowering efficacy in eyes administered an SE travoprost intracameral implant was compared to the IOP lowering in the same eyes while on a topical PGA monotherapy prior to study entry.

RESULTS

Pre-study topical PGA monotherapy and the SE travoprost intracameral implant demonstrated IOP treatment effects of -5.76 mmHg and -7.07 mmHg, respectively. The IOP-lowering treatment effect was significantly greater by 1.31 mmHg for the SE travoprost intracameral implant relative to pre-study PGA monotherapy (95% confidence interval: -2.01, -0.60; P = 0.0003).

CONCLUSIONS

The SE travoprost intracameral implant demonstrated superior IOP-lowering treatment effect versus pre-study topical PGA monotherapy with a superiority margin that was both statistically significant and clinically meaningful. The greater IOP reduction from baseline while on the SE implant versus pre-study topical PGA monotherapy may be a reflection of the optimized adherence and continuous elution of PGA therapy into the anterior chamber achieved with the SE travoprost intracameral implant.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers, NCT03519386 and NCT03868124.

Allergic Conjunctivitis Management: Update on Ophthalmic Solutions

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this review, is to present an updated revision of topical management of SAC and PAC, based on the available scientific evidence and focused on the impact of ophthalmic solution formulations on eye surface.

RECENT FINDINGS

Physicians treating ocular allergy should be aware of tear film and tear film disruption in SAC and PAC, and how eye drop composition and additives affect the physiology of the allergic eye. Seasonal and perennial allergic conjunctivitis (SAC and PAC) are the most frequent causes of ocular allergy (OA), and both conditions are underdiagnosed and undertreated. SAC and PAC are immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated hypersensitivity reactions. The additional tear film disruption caused by the release of inflammatory mediators increases and exacerbates the impact of signs and symptoms and may trigger damage of the ocular surface. Comorbidities are frequent, and dry eye disease in particular must be considered. Clinical guidelines for the management of SAC and PAC recommend topical therapy with antihistamines, mast cells stabilizers or dualaction agents as first-line treatment, but care should be taken, as many medications contain other compounds that may contribute to ocular surface damage.

Preservative-Free Fixed Combination of Tafluprost 0.0015% and Timolol 0.5% for Treatment-Naive Patients with Open-Angle Glaucoma

PURPOSE

To assess efficacy, safety, and tolerability of the preservative-free (PF) fixed-dose combination (FC) of tafluprost 0.0015%/timolol 0.5% (PF tafluprost/timolol FC) in treatments-naive patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG).

METHODS

This was a retrospective, real-world clinical practice setting study that included 107 eyes of 107 subjects with POAG who had never been treated for glaucoma. All subjects were received PF tafluprost/timolol FC once daily. Intraocular pressure (IOP) levels were documented for each eye at the untreated baseline and up to 6 months after the initiation of medical treatment. All adverse events, including ocular and systemic adverse reactions, were recorded. Additionally, the reasons for medication discontinuations were thoroughly documented.

RESULTS

A total of 32 POAG patients with high-baseline IOP (>21 mmHg) and 75 with normal-baseline IOP were included in the study. The subjects' baseline mean age was 62.4 ± 8.7 years (range, 26.0-85.0 years); among them, 42 were female (39.3%). Mean IOP at baseline for all patients was 18.6 ± 4.3 mmHg. The mean IOP at 6 months was 12.6 ± 4.7 mmHg, representing a significant decrease compared to the baseline (-32%, p < 0.001). In POAG patients with high-baseline IOP, mean IOP was significantly lowered from 28.0 ± 5.7 mmHg at baseline to 18.0 ± 5.5 mmHg (-35%, p < 0.001); in patients with normal-baseline IOP, from 14.6 ± 3.4 mmHg at baseline to 10.3 ± 4.1 mmHg (-29%, p < 0.001). PF tafluprost/timolol FC was well-tolerated and safe. After 6 months, 97.2% of all patients remained on therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

In this real-world observational study, once-daily treatment with PF tafluprost/timolol FC demonstrated clinically relevant and statistically significant efficacy, as well as safety and good tolerability, in treatment-naive patients diagnosed with POAG.

Factors affecting adherence to glaucoma medication: Patient perspective from North India

PURPOSE

Adherence to glaucoma medical therapy is a key factor in achieving target intraocular pressure to prevent glaucoma progression. To determine factors affecting medication adherence in glaucoma patients in an urban population belonging to poor socioeconomic status.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted on 200 patients attending glaucoma services in a tertiary referral hospital of North India. Adherence to medication was determined subjectively by questionnaire and objectively by counting the number of used bottles at the end of a month or during refill, whichever was earlier. Patient-related parameters in adherence toward glaucoma medication were studied based on demography, knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP). The statistical techniques of bivariate and multivariate logistic regression were adopted to test the objective.

RESULTS

The population was statistically homogeneous based on gender and income in both groups. A large proportion of patients had bilateral disease (87%) and were on two or more medications (62.5%). Adherence to glaucoma medical therapy was seen in 68% of patients, with knowledge about glaucoma present in 58% of patients. Deterrents to drug adherence were identified as forgetfulness (71%), unavailability of drugs (19%) or funds to purchase the same (26%), polypharmacy (21%), and side effects (5%). Dependence on an escort by 44% and dependence on hospital supply of medications by 60% emerged as the contextual factors requiring scrutiny while prescribing lifelong glaucoma medications. Disease misconceptions (53%) were prevalent and drug instillation practices were unsatisfactory (57%).

CONCLUSION

The study offers insight into patients' perspectives regarding the lifetime use of antiglaucoma medications and focuses on key issues linked to drug nonadherence.

Ocular drug delivery systems: glaucoma patient perceptions from a German university hospital eye clinic

PURPOSE

This study aimed to report on glaucoma patients' beliefs and illness perceptions and to investigate their opinion on ocular drug delivery devices (ODD).

METHODS

We performed a cross-sectional study in a large tertiary-referral outpatient glaucoma clinic, with 102 patients. Validated anonymized questionnaires were used. We investigated the awareness and acceptance regarding ODD (contact lenses (CLs), punctal plugs (PPs), subconjunctival implants, anterior chamber (AC) injections, and drug-emitting stents) and looked at factors that could influence a patient's decision for having an ODD.

RESULTS

Sixty-three patients (61.8%) confirmed they would rather have ODD than keep their eye-drops (38.2%). The most important factors influencing their decision were effectiveness and long-lasting effect. A large proportion of patients reported a preference for CLs (48.0%), PPs (52.9%), or drug-emitting stents (44.1%). When comparing patients who preferred ODD (group-1) versus eye-drops (group-2), significantly more patients in group-1 were worried (p < 0.001) or felt disrupted (p < 0.001) by their use of eye-drops. A significantly greater share of patients in group-1 showed acceptance towards CLs (60.3% vs. 38.5%; p = 0.032), AC injections (38.1% vs. 12.8%, p = 0.006), or drug-emitting stents (54% vs. 28.2%, p = 0.023), whilst there were no significant differences regarding the acceptance of PPs (p = 0.363) or subconjunctival implants (p = 0.058).

CONCLUSION

ODD for the treatment of glaucoma were broadly deemed acceptable by patients in this study. Effectiveness and long-lasting effect were the most important factors for a decision towards having an ODD. The majority of patients who preferred an ODD felt severely affected by their disease and were negatively influenced by their glaucoma medication intake.

Qualitative Analysis of Barriers and Facilitators to Glaucoma Medication Adherence in a Randomized Controlled Trial Intervention

OBJECTIVE

In the Medication Adherence In Glaucoma To Improve Care trial, 200 veterans with medically-treated glaucoma were randomized to an intervention designed to improve glaucoma medication adherence or to usual care. In the 6 months after intervention, the mean proportion of doses taken on schedule was higher for participants in the intervention group compared with controls (0.85 vs. 0.62, P < 0.001). The purpose of this study was to use a mixed-methods approach to compare barriers and facilitators with adherence among participants through qualitative analysis of structured interviews.

DESIGN

This is an analysis of interviews conducted from patients participating in a clinical trial.

PARTICIPANTS

Participants from the intervention arm were separated into quartiles based on medication adherence according to the electronic monitor to sample from high and low responders to the intervention. We interviewed 23 participants; 11 participants with low adherence and 12 with high adherence.

METHODS

Interviews were conducted over telephone and transcribed. Staff members used grounded theory to conduct content analysis and code the transcribed interviews. The iterative process produced categories of common barriers and facilitators for medication adherence.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The frequency of responses addressing common barriers and facilitators were compared between participants with high and low adherence.

RESULTS

In the lowest- and highest-adherence groups, a difficult schedule was the most cited barrier for regular drop usage (63.6% and 58.3%, respectively). In the lowest and highest-adherence groups, the most cited facilitator for adherence was use of the smart bottle (100% and 91.7%, respectively). In the lowest-adherence group, 72.7% of participants cited that improved ability to administer drops was a benefit from the intervention. In the highest-adherence group, 75% of participants cited increased disease knowledge and formation of habits as facilitators from the intervention. Of the 22 of 23 participants who mentioned the smart bottle, 100% cited that they had increased adherence and would continue using the smart bottle.

CONCLUSIONS

Using dosing reminders and personalized patient education may be important avenues for addressing difficulties with adhering to an eye drop schedule to improve glaucoma self-management.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

Comparisons of efficacy and safety between preserved and preservative-free brimonidine tartrate in glaucoma and ocular hypertension: a parallel-grouped, randomized trial

This multicenter (four institutions), randomized, investigator-masked, parallel-group clinical trial evaluated and compared the efficacy and safety of preservative-free and preserved brimonidine tartrate 0.15% in open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Sixty eyes of 60 patients with intraocular pressure (IOP) ≥ 15 mmHg diagnosed with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension were randomized to preserved (n = 31) and preservative-free (n = 29) brimonidine groups. The enrolled eyes received brimonidine monotherapy three times daily. Main outcome measures were corneal/conjunctival staining score, ocular surface disease index, patient satisfaction score, drug tolerance, and drug adherence rate 12 weeks post first administration. Secondary outcome measurements included visual acuity, IOP, drug tolerance, tear-film break-up time, hemodynamic changes including blood pressure and heart rates, and ocular adverse events. After 12 weeks, both preserved and preservative-free groups showed similar IOP reduction, corneal and conjunctival staining scores, drug tolerance, and adherence rates. The preservative-free group showed significantly better tear-film break-up time and higher patient satisfaction regarding drug use and management. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure reductions during the 12 weeks were significantly lower in the preserved group than in the preservative-free group. Preservative-free brimonidine tartrate showed comparable efficacy and safety, better corneal tear film stability, and patient satisfaction than preserved brimonidine.

Identifying and addressing common contributors to nonadherence with ophthalmic medical therapy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To discuss common reasons for nonadherence and review existing and emerging options to reduce nonadherence with ocular medical therapy and optimize therapeutic outcomes.

RECENT FINDINGS

Nonadherence can arise from patient-related issues (e.g. physical, cognitive) and healthcare-related issues (e.g. cost, access to care). Multiple strategies have been developed and evaluated to overcome these barriers to adherence. Identifying nonadherence and its cause(s) facilitates the development of strategies to overcome it.

SUMMARY

Many common causes of nonadherence can be mitigated through a variety of strategies presented.

Intraocular delivery considerations of ocular biologic products and key preclinical determinations

INTRODUCTION

Ophthalmic diseases of the retina are a significant cause of vision loss globally. Despite much progress, there remains an unmet need for durable, long-acting treatment options. While biologic therapies show great promise, they present many challenges, including complexities in biochemical properties, mechanism of action, manufacturing considerations, preclinical evaluation, and delivery mechanism; these are confounded by the unique anatomy and physiology of the eye itself.

AREAS COVERED

This review describes the current development status of intravitreally administered drugs for the treatment of ophthalmic disease, outlines the range of approaches that can be considered for sustained drug delivery to the eye, and discusses key preclinical considerations for the evaluation of ocular biologics.

EXPERT OPINION

The required frequency of dosing in the eye results in a great burden on both patients and the health care system, with direct intraocular administration remaining the most reliable and predictable route. Sustained and controlled ophthalmic drug delivery systems will go a long way in reducing this burden. Sustained delivery can directly dose target tissues, improving bioavailability and reducing off-target systemic effects. Maintaining stability and activity of compounds can prevent aggregation and enable extended duration of release, while sustaining dosage and preventing residual polymer after drug depletion.

[Ocular surface disease in glaucoma patients: Expert opinion and management algorithm in Algeria]

INTRODUCTION

The main goal of treatment for any glaucoma patient is to reduce the intraocular pressure. Unfortunately, the long-term use of glaucoma medications causes deleterious effects on the ocular surface, leading to impaired quality of life and failed glaucoma surgery. In addition, adverse effects of medications are a barrier to adherence and compliance, and this directly affects efficacy. It is therefore essential to regularly assess the ocular surface of glaucoma patients in order to detect any signs of damage early and act accordingly. Although the TFOS DEWS 2 now offers a strategy for diagnosing ocular surface pathologies, some examinations are unfortunately not feasible in Algeria due to lack of time and/or knowledge on the part of some ophthalmologists or are simply inaccessible to others.

METHODS

Algerian experts (members of the ACOS club) met for the purpose of proposing an algorithm for the management of Algerian glaucoma patients, based on the recommendations of the DEWS, their own practice and the results of a preliminary national survey of ophthalmologists.

RESULTS

The proposed algorithm allows evaluation of the ocular surface of the glaucoma patient in current practice by any Algerian ophthalmologist.

CONCLUSION

Management of glaucoma patients should include a systematic examination of the ocular surface. The choice of treatment should be determined by the ocular surface condition of the glaucoma patient.

Devices and Treatments to Address Low Adherence in Glaucoma Patients: A Narrative Review

Poor adherence to topical glaucoma medications has been linked to worse visual field outcomes in glaucoma patients. Therefore, identifying and overcoming the adherence barriers are expected to slow down the progression of disease. The most common barriers to adherence, in addition to the lack of knowledge, include forgetfulness, side effects of medications, difficulties with drop instillation and low self-efficacy. Symptoms and signs of ocular surface disease, which importantly reduce patients' quality of life, are decreased by using preservative-free topical medications. Sustained drug delivery systems using different vehicles seem promising for relieving the burden of drop administration. Currently, only the bimatoprost sustained-release intracameral implant is available for clinical use and single administration. In the era of digitalization, smart drug delivery-connected devices may aid adherence and, by sharing data with care providers, improve monitoring and adjusting treatment. Selective laser trabeculoplasty as first-line treatment delays the need for drops, whereas minimally invasive glaucoma procedures with and without devices combined with cataract surgery increase the likelihood of patients with early-to-moderate glaucoma to remain drop free or reduce the number of drops needed to control intraocular pressure. The aim of this narrative review is to present and discuss devices and treatments that may improve adherence by reducing the need for drops and side effects of medications and aiding in glaucoma monitoring. For the future, there is a need for studies focusing on clinically important outcomes, quality of life and the cost of intervention with longer post-interventional follow up.

The Efficacy, Safety, and Satisfaction Associated with Switching from Brinzolamide or Brimonidine to Brinzolamide/Brimonidine in Open-Angle Glaucoma Patients

We evaluated switching from brinzolamide 1% or brimonidine 0.1% to a fixed-combination of brinzolamide 1% and brimonidine 0.1%, and then determined the efficacy, safety, and satisfaction associated with these changes in glaucoma patients. This prospective, nonrandomized study evaluated a total of 31 enrolled glaucoma patients who underwent treatment with at least brinzolamide 1% or brimonidine 0.1%. Patients were administered a brinzolamide/brimonidine fixed-combination ophthalmic suspension (BBFC) after being switched from their original brinzolamide 1% or brimonidine 0.1% therapy. All other intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering medications currently being used were continued. IOP, superficial punctate keratopathy (SPK), and conjunctival hyperemia data obtained at baseline and then at 4 and 12 weeks were evaluated. To assess the changes in treatment satisfaction, this study utilized the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication-9 (TSQM-9). There was a significant decrease in the mean baseline IOP from 15.7 ± 4.9 mmHg to 13.6 ± 4.4 (p = 0.001) and 13.5 ± 3.9 mmHg (p = 0.002) at 4 and 12 weeks, respectively. Evaluation of the incidence of conjunctival hyperemia or SPK score showed there were no significant changes noted at any time point. The TSQM-9 score demonstrated there was a significant increase for effectiveness after switching from brinzolamide 1% or brimonidine 0.1% to BBFC. After switching from brinzolamide 1% or brimonidine 0.1% to BBFC, there was a significant decrease in the IOP. Patients were aware of the effectiveness of switching from brinzolamide 1% or brimonidine 0.1% to BBFC.

Reviewing the evidence surrounding preservative-free tafluprost/timolol fixed-dose combination therapy in open angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension management: a focus on efficacy, safety and tolerability

INTRODUCTION

Elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) is the most important modifiable risk factor for irreversible sight loss in open angle glaucoma (OAG). The topical fixed-dose combination (FC) of preservative-free (PF) tafluprost (0.0015%) and timolol (0.5%) (tafluprost/timolol) is among the second-line IOP-lowering options for OAG and ocular hypertension (OHT).

AREAS COVERED

PubMed searches identified publications reporting key evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and real-world studies examining the safety, tolerability and IOP-lowering efficacy of PF tafluprost/timolol FC therapy in OAG/OHT management.

EXPERT OPINION

Glaucoma patients are more likely to have ocular surface disease and treatment should be individualized so that target response may be achieved while considering tolerability and quality of life, according to European Glaucoma Society guidelines. PF FC therapies, such as PF tafluprost/timolol FC, avoid ocular surface exposure to toxic preservative agents and reduce the required number of treatment administrations. These properties may enhance treatment tolerability and adherence, resulting in improved IOP-lowering efficacy and disease control. Treatment outcomes from RCTs and real-world studies examining PF tafluprost/timolol FC therapy support this hypothesis, with significant IOP reductions and/or improvements in tolerability parameters demonstrated, regardless of the prior topical therapy used and even when switched directly to PF tafluprost/timolol FC treatment (without washout).

The medication adherence among glaucoma patients during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic in Croatia

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the level of treatment adherence and identify predictors of adherence in glaucoma patients during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in Zagreb, Croatia.

METHODS

The cross-sectional study was conducted among primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) patients at the Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, between 1st April 2020 and 1st April 2021. The sociodemographic data, clinical, and drug information were recorded. The treatment adherence was assessed through a self-administered questionnaire, the Culig Adherence Scale (CAS). Statistical analyses were performed using TIBCO Statistica™ 14.0.0.

RESULTS

113 POAG patients (48M/65F) with a mean age of 65.89 ± 8.53 years were included in this study. According to the CAS, only 39.8% of patients adhered to topical glaucoma treatment. Educational level was positively related to adherence to treatment (p = 0.022). The main predictors for adherence were the patients' positive attitude towards the drug's effect, family support, and good relationship with the healthcare providers (p < 0.05, respectively). The majority of patients stated forgetfulness as the main reason for skipping drug dosing.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-adherence to treatment was prevalent among patients with POAG during the COVID-19 pandemic in Zagreb, Croatia. Personal beliefs and attitudes towards treatment, family support, and patient-healthcare provider relationship were significant predictors of adherence. Special consideration should be given to the whole health system-level strategies targeting the adherence to treatment, especially in crises, in order to achieve positive therapeutic outcomes.The study protocol was registered in the DRKS - German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS-ID: DRKS00022081.

A closer look at allergic contact dermatitis caused by topical ophthalmic medications

BACKGROUND

Allergic contact dermatitis caused by topical ophthalmic medications (OftACD) is frequently difficult to confirm with patch testing and, therefore, it is considered uncommon.

METHODS

We collected retrospective data from a cohort of 65 patients with suspected OftACD patch tested in our Dermatology Unit (2005-2021) according to ESCD guidelines, using a series of topical drugs and excipients (Chemotechnique Diagnostics), including betaxolol and timolol 5% pet. kindly supplied by the pharmaceutical industry. Also, frequently used ophthalmic medications as well as patient's own products were also patch tested 'as is' in most patients.

RESULTS

Positive patch tests to ophthalmic medications occurred in 44 patients (67.7%) (38F/6M; mean age 63.1 years), with 102 positive reactions. Most positive reactions were associated with active ingredients (n = 56), especially aminoglycoside antibiotics (n = 27), followed by excipients (n = 24) such as sodium metabisulfite (n = 7). There were also positive reactions to topical products tested 'as is' (n = 22), mostly containing beta-blockers, but only five of these reacted to the active ingredient.

DISCUSSION

This study reinforces previous findings in OftACD, such as older age of onset, and the importance of antibiotics, contrasting with the progressively lower prevalence of excipients. In addition, it helps raising awareness for the sensitization to beta-blockers, which is probably underestimated. Patch test preparations for the diagnosis of OftACD may require protocol optimization.

Evaluation of Compliance Issues to Anti-glaucoma Medications Before and After a Structured Interventional Program

Background Glaucoma is one of the most common eye diseases in the elderly and the major cause of irreversible vision loss worldwide. Adherence to life-long therapies is crucial to prevent glaucoma progression. The current study aims to assess the educational element and its impact on glaucoma medication compliance over short and long periods. Methods This was a survey-based, prospective, interventional study, conducted via interviews of all glaucoma patients presented to the Ophthalmology Center at King Abdullah Medical City (KAMC), Makkah, Saudi Arabia. To achieve the study's aim, a questionnaire with 31 items was utilized, followed by a structured program between September 2019 to June 2021. After that, a second questionnaire was used after a one month to one year to re-evaluate the intervention. Data was automatically collected in Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, Washington, United States) and entered into IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 22.0 (Released 2013; IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, United States) for analysis. Results Non-compliance was detected in 15.7% of all recruited patients (n=134). However, the non-compliance percentage dropped to 10 (7.5%) after the structured program (P=0.028). Contributing factors were low educational level, bilateral eye disease, duration of treatment more than two years, and having more than two eye treatment bottles; however, the P-value was insignificant. Conclusions About one-sixth of our glaucoma patients were found to be non-compliant. However, the non-compliance reduced by more than half after the structured educational program. Treatment adherence can be improved by implementing awareness and correcting the beliefs about illness and medicines, thus potentially delaying disease development.

Switching to Preservative-Free Tafluprost/Timolol Fixed-Dose Combination in the Treatment of Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension: Subanalysis of Data from the VISIONARY Study According to Baseline Monotherapy Treatment

INTRODUCTION

The VISIONARY study demonstrated statistically significant intraocular pressure (IOP) reductions with the preservative-free fixed-dose combination of tafluprost 0.0015% and timolol 0.5% (PF tafluprost/timolol FC) in open-angle glaucoma (OAG) or ocular hypertension (OHT) patients, sub-optimally controlled with topical prostaglandin analogue (PGA) or beta-blocker monotherapy. Current subanalyses have examined these data according to the baseline monotherapy.

METHODS

A European, prospective, observational study included adults (aged ≥ 18 years) with OAG or OHT, who were switched to the PF tafluprost/timolol FC from PGA or beta-blocker monotherapy. Treatment outcomes were reported according to prior monotherapy subgroup: beta-blocker, preserved latanoprost, PF-latanoprost, bimatoprost, tafluprost, and travoprost. Endpoints included the mean change from baseline regarding IOP, conjunctival hyperemia, and corneal fluorescein staining (CFS) at Week 4 and Week 12, and at Month 6.

RESULTS

The subanalysis included 577 patients. All prior monotherapy subgroups demonstrated statistically significant IOP reductions from baseline at Week 4, that were maintained through Month 6 (p < 0.001). Mean (SD) IOP change at Month 6 was 6.6 (4.16), 6.3 (4.39), 5.6 (3.67), 4.9 (2.97), 4.6 (4.39), and 4.7  (3.64) mmHg for prior beta-blocker, preserved latanoprost, PF-latanoprost, tafluprost, bimatoprost, and travoprost subgroups, respectively. The largest IOP change was observed in the preserved latanoprost subgroup for each of the ≥ 20%, ≥ 25%, ≥ 30%, and ≥ 35% IOP reduction categories at Month 6, demonstrating respective reductions of 8.06, 9.20, 10.64, and 11.55 mmHg. CFS was significantly reduced at Month 6 in the prior bimatoprost subgroup (p = 0.0013). Conjunctival hyperemia severity was significantly reduced at each study visit for prior preserved latanoprost users (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

PF tafluprost/timolol FC therapy provided statistically and clinically significant IOP reductions from Week 4 over the total 6-month period, in patients with OAG/OHT, regardless of the type of prior PGA or beta-blocker monotherapy used. Conjunctival hyperemia severity and CFS decreased significantly in prior bimatoprost and preserved latanoprost users, respectively.

CLINICAL STUDY NUMBER

European Union electronic Register of Post-Authorization Studies (EU PAS) register number: EUPAS22204.