1
|
Russell C, George TP, Chopra N, Le Foll B, Matheson FI, Rehm J, Lange S. Feasibility and effectiveness of extended-release buprenorphine (XR-BUP) among correctional populations: a systematic review. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DRUG AND ALCOHOL ABUSE 2024:1-20. [PMID: 38940929 DOI: 10.1080/00952990.2024.2360984] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2023] [Accepted: 04/29/2024] [Indexed: 06/29/2024]
Abstract
Background: Medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) reduce risks for overdose among correctional populations. Among other barriers, daily dosing requirements hinder treatment continuity post-release. Extended-release buprenorphine (XR-BUP) may therefore be beneficial. However, limited evidence exists.Objectives: To conduct a systematic review examining the feasibility and effectiveness of XR-BUP among correctional populations.Methods: Searches were carried out in Pubmed, Embase, and PsychINFO in October 2023. Ten studies reporting on feasibility or effectiveness of XR-BUP were included, representing n = 819 total individuals (81.6% male). Data were extracted and narratively reported under the following main outcomes: 1) Feasibility; 2) Effectiveness; and 3) Barriers and Facilitators.Results: Studies were heterogeneous. Correctional populations were two times readier to try XR-BUP compared to non-correctional populations. XR-BUP was feasible and safe, with no diversion, overdoses, or deaths; several negative side effects were reported. Compared to other MOUD, XR-BUP significantly reduced drug use, resulted in similar or higher treatment retention rates, fewer re-incarcerations, and was cost-beneficial, with a lower overall monthly/yearly cost. Barriers to XR-BUP, such as side effects and a fear of needles, as well as facilitators, such as a lowered risk of opioid relapse, were also identified.Conclusion: XR-BUP appears to be a feasible and potentially effective alternative treatment option for correctional populations with OUD. XR-BUP may reduce community release-related risks, such as opioid use and overdose risk, as well as barriers to treatment retention. Efforts to expand access to and uptake of XR-BUP among correctional populations are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cayley Russell
- Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Toronto, ON, Canada
- Ontario Node, Canadian Research Initiative in Substance Misuse (CRISM), Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Tony P George
- Institute of Medical Science (IMS), University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Addictions Division, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Nitin Chopra
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Addictions Division, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Bernard Le Foll
- Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Toronto, ON, Canada
- Ontario Node, Canadian Research Initiative in Substance Misuse (CRISM), Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Medical Science (IMS), University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Addictions Division, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Toronto, ON, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Toronto, ON, Canada
- Translational Addiction Research Laboratory, Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Waypoint Research Institute, Waypoint Centre for Mental Health Care, Penetanguishene, ON, Canada
| | - Flora I Matheson
- Institute of Medical Science (IMS), University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, St. Michael's Hospital, a site of Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Centre for Criminology & Sociolegal Studies, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jürgen Rehm
- Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Toronto, ON, Canada
- Ontario Node, Canadian Research Initiative in Substance Misuse (CRISM), Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Medical Science (IMS), University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institut für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Center for Interdisciplinary Addiction Research (ZIS), Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
| | - Shannon Lange
- Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Medical Science (IMS), University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Guillery SPE, Reiners S, Fahrner M, Enge S, Hellweg R, Kunte H, Kronenberg G. The switching process from buprenorphine sublingual tablets to the monthly buprenorphine subcutaneous depot injection in opioid dependent patients. Addict Biol 2023; 28:e13275. [PMID: 37186443 DOI: 10.1111/adb.13275] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2022] [Revised: 02/27/2023] [Accepted: 03/20/2023] [Indexed: 05/17/2023]
Abstract
The 2018 European Union (EU) approved weekly and monthly subcutaneous buprenorphine depot injection (BUP-XR), for opioid substitution medication proved to offer some specific treatment benefits. The present study examines the process of switching from buprenorphine sublingual tablets (BUP-SL) to BUP-XR from a patient's point of view. In total, nine patients were surveyed by means of an open-answer questionnaire regarding course and side effects of the medication switch. Six of these patients were surveyed in more detail under BUP-SL, as well as 4 and 16 weeks after the switch to BUP-XR by means of a test battery of questions on socio-demography, withdrawal symptoms, craving, physical well-being, treatment satisfaction and concomitant use of illegal substances. Patients reported significant worse physical well-being and lower treatment satisfaction in 4 weeks compared with 16 weeks after the medication switch to the BUP-XR. Furthermore, they reported significant more frequent co-use of illicit drugs, worse physical well-being, lower treatment satisfaction and more craving experience 4 weeks after the switch compared with the treatment under BUP-SL. Patients 16 weeks under BUP-XR reported significant more illicit co-use and lower treatment satisfaction compared with patients under BUP-SL. Connections between therapy dissatisfaction, physical discomfort, experienced craving and drug co-consumption were discovered. In the first weeks after the medication switch, patients experience potentially distressing symptoms, which, however, seem to diminish over time. Close supervision and comprehensive patient education on possible burdens of the medication switch to the BUP-XR might prevent unfavourable treatment courses and premature therapy dropouts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie Paula Elisabeth Guillery
- Clinic for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Psychology, MSB - Medical School Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sven Reiners
- KMV Krankenhaus des Maßregelvollzugs Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Sören Enge
- Department of Psychology, MSB - Medical School Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Rainer Hellweg
- Clinic for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Hagen Kunte
- MSH - Medical School Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Golo Kronenberg
- Psychiatrisches Universitätsklinikum Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bodnar RJ. Endogenous opiates and behavior: 2021. Peptides 2023; 164:171004. [PMID: 36990387 DOI: 10.1016/j.peptides.2023.171004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2023] [Revised: 03/23/2023] [Accepted: 03/23/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023]
Abstract
This paper is the forty-fourth consecutive installment of the annual anthological review of research concerning the endogenous opioid system, summarizing articles published during 2021 that studied the behavioral effects of molecular, pharmacological and genetic manipulation of opioid peptides and receptors as well as effects of opioid/opiate agonizts and antagonists. The review is subdivided into the following specific topics: molecular-biochemical effects and neurochemical localization studies of endogenous opioids and their receptors (1), the roles of these opioid peptides and receptors in pain and analgesia in animals (2) and humans (3), opioid-sensitive and opioid-insensitive effects of nonopioid analgesics (4), opioid peptide and receptor involvement in tolerance and dependence (5), stress and social status (6), learning and memory (7), eating and drinking (8), drug abuse and alcohol (9), sexual activity and hormones, pregnancy, development and endocrinology (10), mental illness and mood (11), seizures and neurologic disorders (12), electrical-related activity and neurophysiology (13), general activity and locomotion (14), gastrointestinal, renal and hepatic functions (15), cardiovascular responses (16), respiration and thermoregulation (17), and immunological responses (18).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard J Bodnar
- Department of Psychology and Neuropsychology Doctoral Sub-Program, Queens College, City University of New York, CUNY, 65-30 Kissena Blvd., Flushing, NY 11367, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cuperfain AB, Katznelson G, Costa T, Wong P, Beyraghi N, George TP, Lofwall MR, Chopra N. Factors to guide the use of extended-release buprenorphine formulations for specific patient populations. JOURNAL OF SUBSTANCE USE 2023. [DOI: 10.1080/14659891.2023.2174908] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/11/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Ari B. Cuperfain
- Department of Psychiatry, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gali Katznelson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Tianna Costa
- Addictions Division and Centre for Complex Interventions, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Patrick Wong
- Addictions Division and Centre for Complex Interventions, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Narges Beyraghi
- Department of Psychiatry, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Addictions Division and Centre for Complex Interventions, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Tony P. George
- Department of Psychiatry, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Addictions Division and Centre for Complex Interventions, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michelle R. Lofwall
- Departments of Behavioral Science and Psychiatry, Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Nitin Chopra
- Department of Psychiatry, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Addictions Division and Centre for Complex Interventions, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Russell C, Pang M, Nafeh F, Farrell Macdonald S, Derkzen D, Rehm J, Fischer B. Barriers and facilitators to opioid agonist treatment (OAT) engagement among individuals released from federal incarceration into the community in Ontario, Canada. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being 2022; 17:2094111. [PMID: 35787743 PMCID: PMC9258049 DOI: 10.1080/17482631.2022.2094111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Correctional populations with opioid use disorder experience increased health risks during community transition periods. Opioid Agonist Treatment (OAT) can reduce these risks, but retention is a key challenge. This study addresses a knowledge gap by describing facilitators and barriers to OAT engagement among federal correctional populations released into the community in Ontario, Canada. METHODS This article describes results from a longitudinal mixed-methods study examining OAT transition experiences among thirty-five individuals released from federal incarceration in Ontario, Canada. Assessments were completed within one year of participants' release. Data were thematically analyzed. RESULTS The majority (77%) of participants remained engaged in OAT, however, 69% had their release suspended and 49% returned to custody. Key facilitators for OAT engagement included flexibility, positive staff rapport, and structure. Fragmented OAT transitions, financial OAT coverage, balancing reintegration requirements, logistical challenges, and inaccessibility of 'take-home' OAT medications were common barriers. CONCLUSIONS Post-incarceration transition periods are critical for OAT retention, yet individuals in Ontario experience barriers to OAT engagement that contribute to treatment disruptions and related risks such as relapse and/or re-incarceration. Additional measures to support community OAT transitions are required, including improved discharge planning, amendments to OAT and financial coverage policies, and an expansion of OAT options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cayley Russell
- Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michelle Pang
- Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Frishta Nafeh
- Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Dena Derkzen
- Policy Sector, Research Branch, Correctional Service of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jürgen Rehm
- Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Medical Science (IMS), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institut für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Department of International Health Projects, Institute for Leadership and Health Management, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Benedikt Fischer
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Centre for Applied Research in Mental Health and Addiction (CARMHA), Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
- Department of Psychiatry, Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Martin RA, Berk J, Rich JD, Kang A, Fritsche J, Clarke JG. Use of long-acting injectable buprenorphine in the correctional setting. J Subst Abuse Treat 2022; 142:108851. [PMID: 35939914 PMCID: PMC9743485 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2022.108851] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2022] [Revised: 06/29/2022] [Accepted: 07/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND As overdoses due to opioids rise, medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) continue to be underemployed, resulting in limited access to potentially life-saving treatment. Substance use disorders are prevalent in individuals who are incarcerated, and these individuals are at increased risk for death postrelease due to overdose. Few jails and prisons offer MOUD and most limit access. Extended-release buprenorphine (XR-BUP), a novel monthly injectable MOUD formulation, could be uniquely poised to address treatment access in correctional settings. METHODS This study linked a retrospective cohort design of statewide datasets to evaluate the real-world use of XR-BUP. The study included individuals (N = 54) who received XR-BUP while incarcerated from January 2019 through February 2022. The study was conducted at the Rhode Island Department of Corrections, with the nation's first comprehensive statewide correctional MOUD program. RESULTS Fifty-four individuals received a combined total of 162 injections during the study period. The study found no evidence of tampering with the injection site, indicating no attempts by participants to remove, hoard, or divert the medication. Sixty-one percent reported at least one adverse effect after injections were received, with an average of 2.8 side effects. Sixty-one percent of those released on XR-BUP engaged in MOUD after release, 30 % continued with XR-BUP. CONCLUSIONS XR-BUP is feasible and acceptable in correctional settings. XR-BUP addresses administrative concerns of diversion that obstruct lifesaving MOUD and offers another safe and effective treatment option. Further studies and trials should continue to assess this novel medication's ability to treat opioid addiction in the correctional setting and upon release to the community.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosemarie A Martin
- Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University School of Public Health, 121 S Main St, Providence, RI 02903, USA.
| | - Justin Berk
- Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, 222 Richmond St, Providence, RI 02903, USA; Rhode Island Department of Corrections, 40 Howard Avenue, Cranston, RI 02920, USA
| | - Josiah D Rich
- Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, 222 Richmond St, Providence, RI 02903, USA; Department of Epidemiology, Brown University School of Public Health, 121 South Main Street, Providence, RI 02903, USA; The Center for Health and Justice Transformation, The Miriam Hospital, 1125 N. Main Street Providence, RI 02904, USA; Center of Biomedical Research Excellence on Opioids and Overdose, The Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Augustine Kang
- Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University School of Public Health, 121 S Main St, Providence, RI 02903, USA; Stanford University School of Medicine, 291 Campus Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - John Fritsche
- Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University School of Public Health, 121 S Main St, Providence, RI 02903, USA
| | - Jennifer G Clarke
- Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, 222 Richmond St, Providence, RI 02903, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Scott R, Aboud A, O'Gorman T. Long-acting injectable buprenorphine - 'best practice' opioid agonist therapy for Australian prisoners. Australas Psychiatry 2022; 30:498-502. [PMID: 34852654 DOI: 10.1177/10398562211059086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To consider opioid agonist therapy in prisons. CONCLUSIONS Given the substantial risks of substance misuse by prisoners, long-acting injectable buprenorphine should be adopted as 'best practice' treatment in Australian prison populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Russ Scott
- Prison Mental Health Service, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Andrew Aboud
- Prison Mental Health Service, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Thomas O'Gorman
- Metro North Mental Health Alcohol and Drug Service, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|