1
|
Wang Y, Wong ELY, Qiu H, Cheung AWL, Tang KS, Yeoh EK. The influence of written medication reminder on patient experience among older adult patients: a repeat cross-sectional study. BMC Geriatr 2024; 24:662. [PMID: 39112924 PMCID: PMC11304567 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-024-05253-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2023] [Accepted: 07/26/2024] [Indexed: 08/11/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Older adult patients are particularly vulnerable to medication-related issues during the discharge process. To enhance medication discharge education and patient experience, a written medication reminder, incorporating crucial medication side effects and warning signs, was implemented in medicine wards. This study aimed to examine the influence of this reminder on patient experience and medication-taking behaviors among older adults in public healthcare settings. METHODS Two separate rounds of cross-sectional surveys were conducted before and after the program implementation among different discharged patients in each round. The study enrolled older adult patients aged ≥ 65 or their caregivers discharged from the medical wards of four pilot public hospitals in Hong Kong. A structured questionnaire was administered via telephone within 14 days of the patient's discharge. The survey assessed patients' experience with the provided medication information during discharge, including the clarity, adequacy, and usefulness of the information, as well as their overall experience with inpatient services. The self-reported medication-taken behaviors, including adherence and side-effect encounters, were also measured. RESULTS A total of 1,265 responses were collected before the implementation of the medication reminder, and 1,426 responses were obtained after the implementation. Pre/post-implementation survey comparison showed significant improvement in patient experience regarding the clarity of the provided medication information (7.93 ± 1.84 vs. 8.18 ± 1.69, P = 0.002), adequacy (7.92 ± 1.93 vs. 8.15 ± 1.76, P = 0.014), and usefulness (8.06 ± 1.80 vs. 8.26 ± 1.70, P = 0.017), significantly positive experience on the overall discharge information (β coefficient, 0.43 [95%CI, 0.30 to 0.56]) and inpatient service (β coefficient, 0.47 [95%CI, 0.32 to 0.61]). In addition, the side effects encounters were significantly lower in the post-implementation survey group (11.6% vs. 9.0%, P = 0.04) and no statistical difference was found in self-reported medication adherence between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS The provision of written medication reminders on key medication risks effectively improved older adult patients' experience and reduced side effects without any unintended negative consequences. The findings can serve as a reference for similar settings seeking to enhance post-discharge care among older adult patients. Future studies could investigate the influence in other specialties and age groups and include clinical outcomes to test the program's effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yingxuan Wang
- JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Eliza Lai-Yi Wong
- JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
- Centre for Health Systems and Policy Research, JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
| | - Hong Qiu
- JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
- Centre for Health Systems and Policy Research, JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Annie Wai-Ling Cheung
- JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
- Centre for Health Systems and Policy Research, JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | | | - Eng-Kiong Yeoh
- JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
- Centre for Health Systems and Policy Research, JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nakata T, Fukuda A, Ojiro K, Matsuyama K, Masaki T, Itoh H, Shibata H. A Questionnaire Survey of Prescription Preferences and Leftover Medication Conversations: Comparisons Among Kidney Disease Patients and Healthcare Professionals. Cureus 2023; 15:e45842. [PMID: 37881374 PMCID: PMC10594144 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.45842] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/22/2023] [Indexed: 10/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and patients with kidney failure receiving hemodialysis (HD) receive various types of medications. However, little is known about the differences in medication preference and how to deal with leftover medication among CKD patients and HD patients. The purpose of this study was to investigate the differences in medication preference and ways of dealing with leftover medication between CKD patients, HD patients, physicians, and pharmacists via a questionnaire survey. METHODS The ethics committee of Oita University, Oita, Japan, approved this survey. Outpatients undergoing treatment by a nephrologist in four facilities in Oita prefecture, Japan, were asked to answer a questionnaire on their preference for medication and how to deal with leftover medication. Respondents gave their informed written consent. The same questionnaire was administered to nephrologists and pharmacists online. RESULTS In this survey, 383 patients (260 patients with CKD and 123 patients with HD), 22 nephrologists, and 28 pharmacists responded. The response rate of valid responses was more than 90% for each of the groups. In particular, 41% of patients with CKD and 56% of patients with HD never inform their doctor about leftover medication or only inform them when there is a lot of leftover medication. On the other hand, 23% of physicians have never asked their patients about them. Ordinary logistic regression analysis indicated that there is no significant relationship between how often patients talk about leftover medication, patients' preferences, or patient states. CONCLUSIONS Despite the age and state of the patients, it is important to discuss the perception of medication with each other and confirm the condition of the remaining medication to improve concordance and obtain the desired treatment effect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takeshi Nakata
- Department of Endocrinology Metabolism, Rheumatology, and Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Oita, JPN
| | - Akihiro Fukuda
- Department of Endocrinology Metabolism, Rheumatology, and Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Oita, JPN
| | - Kyoko Ojiro
- Department of Internal Medicine, Matsuoka Medical Clinic, Oita, JPN
| | | | - Takayuki Masaki
- Department of Endocrinology Metabolism, Rheumatology, and Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Oita, JPN
| | - Hiroki Itoh
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Oita University Hospital, Oita, JPN
| | - Hirotaka Shibata
- Department of Endocrinology Metabolism, Rheumatology, and Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Oita, JPN
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chittem M, Sridharan SG, Pongener M, Maya S, Epton T. Experiences of barriers to self-monitoring and medication-management among Indian patients with type 2 diabetes, their primary family-members and physicians. Chronic Illn 2022; 18:677-690. [PMID: 34259058 DOI: 10.1177/17423953211032251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study explored the subjective accounts of the main barriers to self-monitoring of blood-glucose (SMBG) and medication-management among Indian patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM), their primary family-members (PFMs) and physicians. METHODS Using convenience sampling, patients with T2DM, their PFMs, and physicians, residing in a South Indian capital city, were recruited for semi-structured, audio-recorded interviews. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the data. RESULTS Fifty patients (female = 14; mean age = 42.5 years) and their PFMs (female = 38; mean age = 39 years), and 25 physicians (female = 4; mean age = 49.8 years) were recruited. Three superordinate themes were identified: (i) complex medication-regimen: confusion, forgetting and reduced motivation, (ii) family recommendations of alternative therapies due to the social pressures of avoiding stigma, intrusiveness and being misrepresented for injecting insulin, and (iii) an expensive illness: choosing to spend money on only medication. DISCUSSION Implications of the findings highlight the need to (i) train physicians in communication and empathy skills, (ii) empower patients to communicate their barriers to physicians through triadic communication models and question-prompt lists, (iii) educate communities on the benefits of insulin for managing T2DM to reduce stigma, and (iv) equip communities with information about health insurance to address the financial toll of T2DM management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahati Chittem
- Department of Liberal Arts, Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad, Kandi, India
| | | | | | - Sravannthi Maya
- Department of Liberal Arts, Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad, Kandi, India
| | - Tracy Epton
- Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, Division of Psychology & Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sze WT, Pudney R, Wei L. Inpatients' satisfaction towards information received about medicines. Eur J Hosp Pharm 2020; 27:280-285. [PMID: 32839260 DOI: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2018-001721] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2018] [Revised: 11/09/2018] [Accepted: 11/28/2018] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Healthcare providers (HCPs) often overestimate the quality and quantity of information they provide to patients. This study aimed to find out inpatients' satisfaction towards information about medicines provided during inpatient stay. METHODS This cross-sectional study was conducted at Lewisham Hospital and Queen Elizabeth Hospital in June 2017. Patients' satisfaction with information about medicines provided during inpatient stay was assessed using a 17-item Satisfaction with Information about Medicines Scale (SIMS). RESULTS 71 patients completed the questionnaire. The average percentage of patients being satisfied with the information provided in the nine-item 'action and usage' subscale of SIMS was 74.4%, compared with the eight-item 'potential problems' subscale with an average percentage of 56%. Patients aged 45-64 were more likely to be satisfied with information on 'how the medicines work' than the 65 and above as well as the 18-44 age groups (p=0.045). Patients who attended secondary school and below were more likely to be satisfied than those attending college and above towards this information (p=0.002). Patients of white or mixed white and black ethnicity were less satisfied than other ethnic groups of information regarding the impact of medication on sex life (p=0.019). Black or black British were more likely to be satisfied towards information on unwanted medication side effects compared with other ethnic groups (p=0.025). CONCLUSIONS HCPs could improve on the provision of information on potential problems that patients might experience with their medicines. Patients' age, educational level and ethnicity should be taken into consideration when providing information about medicines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Thing Sze
- School of Pharmacy, University College London, London, UK
| | - Richard Pudney
- Department of Pharmacy, Lewisham and Greenwich NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Li Wei
- School of Pharmacy, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Socha Hernandez AV, Deeks LS, Shield AJ. Understanding medication safety and Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease: a patient perspective. Int J Clin Pharm 2020; 42:1507-1514. [PMID: 32804316 DOI: 10.1007/s11096-020-01123-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2020] [Accepted: 08/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Background Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease is a common inherited neuropathy where patients may be sensitive to adverse effects of certain medicines; however, information about medication safety in this group of people is limited. Objective This study aimed to investigate the experience of Australian individuals with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease in using medications, including perceived impact of drug-induced adverse effects. Secondarily, it aimed to determine whether individuals with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease feel adequately supported to make decisions about medication safety. Setting Focus groups and interviews (face-to-face or telephone) of individuals with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease in Australia. Method A mixed methods qualitative study was conducted between September 2015 and August 2016 using semi-structured interviews. Thematic analysis of interview transcripts was conducted independently by two researchers using inductive coding until concept saturation was achieved. Main outcome measure Perceptions of medicines safety in people with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease, including barriers to making informed decisions about medication safety. Results Twenty-four adults with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease participated. Anaesthetics (18%) and pregabalin (15%) were the medications most frequently reported as impacting on Charcot-Marie-Tooth symptoms. Participants sought medication information primarily from general practitioners or neurologists. The main barriers identified by participants were a perceived poor understanding in non-specialist health professionals about Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease and lack of attention to medication safety concerns in people with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease; this resulted in dissatisfaction about the advice provided. Many individuals who faced uncertainty in obtaining and understanding medicines information turned to internet resources, peer groups, and use of complementary and alternative medicines to self-manage Charcot-Marie-Tooth exacerbations. Conclusion Participants reported drug-related adverse effects and a difficulty in obtaining safety information about medication. This study highlights the need for improved evidence about medication safety in people with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. Development of evidence-based resources, increased awareness amongst health professionals about Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease and a team-based care approach could facilitate shared decisions about medication use for people with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Louise S Deeks
- Discipline of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Bruce, ACT, 2617, Australia
| | - Alison J Shield
- Discipline of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Bruce, ACT, 2617, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sibounheuang P, Olson PS, Kittiboonyakun P. Patients' and healthcare providers’ perspectives on diabetes management: A systematic review of qualitative studies. Res Social Adm Pharm 2020; 16:854-874. [DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2018] [Revised: 08/22/2019] [Accepted: 09/01/2019] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
|
7
|
Schmidt-Busby J, Wiles J, Exeter D, Kenealy T. Understanding 'context' in the self-management of type 2 diabetes with comorbidities: A systematic review and realist evaluation. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2018; 142:321-334. [PMID: 29902543 DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2018.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2017] [Revised: 05/14/2018] [Accepted: 06/06/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify contextual factors that affect self-management of diabetes with comorbidities, and to evaluate in what way these factors affect self-management effectiveness. METHODS A systematic review of literature considered English language articles published within Medline, PsycINFO, Pubmed, CINAHL Plus, and Scopus databases that focussed on individuals' experiences of type 2 diabetes from primary intervention or observational studies. A realist evaluation approach was used to analyse themes identified within the literature. Context-mechanism-outcome theories were constructed to identify underlying contextual factors and to construct a model illustrating diabetes self-management effectiveness. RESULTS Of 1519 articles identified, 30 met inclusion criteria. Adherence was found to be the common mechanism that (within given contexts) determined self-management effectiveness. Limited financial resources were identified as the key context. Our model makes explicit a structural weaknesses of diabetes self-management. CONCLUSIONS Coping with diabetes in the context of people's lives requires attention to issues that are often outside the remit of the person with diabetes, the health care team, and the health system within which self-management is located. Realist evaluations illuminate programme mechanisms and fine-tune context. They aid initial understandings of how an intervention or programme is thought to work, in order to influence and (re)design (new) programmes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacqueline Schmidt-Busby
- Counties Manukau Health, Middlemore Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand; School of Population Health, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, New Zealand.
| | - Janine Wiles
- School of Population Health, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, New Zealand.
| | - Daniel Exeter
- School of Population Health, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, New Zealand.
| | - Timothy Kenealy
- School of Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, New Zealand.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bernhard G, Mahler C, Seidling HM, Stützle M, Ose D, Baudendistel I, Wensing M, Szecsenyi J. Developing a Shared Patient-Centered, Web-Based Medication Platform for Type 2 Diabetes Patients and Their Health Care Providers: Qualitative Study on User Requirements. J Med Internet Res 2018; 20:e105. [PMID: 29588269 PMCID: PMC5893891 DOI: 10.2196/jmir.8666] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2017] [Revised: 11/24/2017] [Accepted: 12/07/2017] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Information technology tools such as shared patient-centered, Web-based medication platforms hold promise to support safe medication use by strengthening patient participation, enhancing patients’ knowledge, helping patients to improve self-management of their medications, and improving communication on medications among patients and health care professionals (HCPs). However, the uptake of such platforms remains a challenge also due to inadequate user involvement in the development process. Employing a user-centered design (UCD) approach is therefore critical to ensure that user’ adoption is optimal. Objective The purpose of this study was to identify what patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and their HCPs regard necessary requirements in terms of functionalities and usability of a shared patient-centered, Web-based medication platform for patients with T2DM. Methods This qualitative study included focus groups with purposeful samples of patients with T2DM (n=25), general practitioners (n=13), and health care assistants (n=10) recruited from regional health care settings in southwestern Germany. In total, 8 semistructured focus groups were conducted. Sessions were audio- and video-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and subjected to a computer-aided qualitative content analysis. Results Appropriate security and access methods, supported data entry, printing, and sending information electronically, and tracking medication history were perceived as the essential functionalities. Although patients wanted automatic interaction checks and safety alerts, HCPs on the contrary were concerned that unspecific alerts confuse patients and lead to nonadherence. Furthermore, HCPs were opposed to patients’ ability to withhold or restrict access to information in the platform. To optimize usability, there was consensus among participants to display information in a structured, chronological format, to provide information in lay language, to use visual aids and customize information content, and align the platform to users’ workflow. Conclusions By employing a UCD, this study provides insight into the desired functionalities and usability of patients and HCPs regarding a shared patient-centered, Web-based medication platform, thus increasing the likelihood to achieve a functional and useful system. Substantial and ongoing engagement by all intended user groups is necessary to reconcile differences in requirements of patients and HCPs, especially regarding medication safety alerts and access control. Moreover, effective training of patients and HCPs on medication self-management (support) and optimal use of the tool will be a prerequisite to unfold the platform’s full potential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gerda Bernhard
- Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Cornelia Mahler
- Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hanna Marita Seidling
- Cooperation Unit Clinical Pharmacy, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacoepidemiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Marion Stützle
- Cooperation Unit Clinical Pharmacy, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacoepidemiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Dominik Ose
- Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Division of Cancer Population Sciences, Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| | - Ines Baudendistel
- Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michel Wensing
- Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Joachim Szecsenyi
- Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Mathews R, Wang W, Kaltenbach LA, Thomas L, Shah RU, Ali M, Peterson ED, Wang TY. Hospital Variation in Adherence Rates to Secondary Prevention Medications and the Implications on Quality. Circulation 2018; 137:2128-2138. [PMID: 29386204 DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.117.029160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2017] [Accepted: 01/04/2018] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Medication adherence is important to improve the long-term outcomes after acute myocardial infarction (MI). We hypothesized that there is significant variation among US hospitals in terms of medication adherence after MI, and that patients treated at hospitals with higher medication adherence after MI will have better long-term cardiovascular outcomes. METHODS We identified 19 704 Medicare patients discharged after acute MI from 347 US hospitals participating in the ACTION Registry-GWTG (Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network Registry-Get With the Guidelines) from January 2, 2007, to October 1, 2010. Using linked Medicare Part D prescription filling data, medication adherence was defined as proportion of days covered >80% within 90 days after discharge. Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to compare 2-year major adverse cardiovascular events among hospitals with high, moderate, and low 90-day medication adherence. RESULTS By 90 days after MI, overall rates of adherence to medications prescribed at discharge were 68% for β-blockers, 63% for statins, 64% for angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers, and 72% for thienopyridines. Adherence to these medications up to 90 days varied significantly among hospitals: β-blockers (proportion of days covered >80%; 59% to 75%), statins (55% to 69%), thienopyridines (64% to 77%), and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers (57% to 69%). Compared with hospitals in the lowest quartile of 90-day composite medication adherence, hospitals with the highest adherence had lower unadjusted and adjusted 2-year major adverse cardiovascular event risk (27.5% versus 35.3%; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.88; 95% confidence interval, 0.80-0.96). High-adherence hospitals also had lower adjusted rates of death or readmission (hazard ratio, 0.90; 95% confidence interval, 0.85-0.96), whereas there was no difference in mortality after adjustment. CONCLUSIONS Use of secondary prevention medications after discharge varies significantly among US hospitals and is inversely associated with 2-year outcomes. Hospitals may improve medication adherence after discharge and patient outcomes through better coordination of care between inpatient and outpatient settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robin Mathews
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC (R.M., W.W., L.A.K., L.T., E.D.P., T.Y.W.)
| | - William Wang
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC (R.M., W.W., L.A.K., L.T., E.D.P., T.Y.W.)
| | - Lisa A Kaltenbach
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC (R.M., W.W., L.A.K., L.T., E.D.P., T.Y.W.)
| | - Laine Thomas
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC (R.M., W.W., L.A.K., L.T., E.D.P., T.Y.W.)
| | - Rashmee U Shah
- University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City (R.U.S.)
| | - Murtuza Ali
- Louisiana State University School of Medicine, New Orleans (M.A.)
| | - Eric D Peterson
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC (R.M., W.W., L.A.K., L.T., E.D.P., T.Y.W.)
| | - Tracy Y Wang
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC (R.M., W.W., L.A.K., L.T., E.D.P., T.Y.W.)
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Wood TJ, Koester KA, Christopoulos KA, Sauceda JA, Neilands TB, Johnson MO. If someone cares about you, you are more apt to come around: improving HIV care engagement by strengthening the patient-provider relationship. Patient Prefer Adherence 2018; 12:919-927. [PMID: 29872277 PMCID: PMC5973398 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s157003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The patient-provider relationship is a central factor that can promote or hinder long-term engagement in care among people living with chronic illnesses. In this paper, we explore characteristics of the patient-provider relationship that facilitated or hindered engagement in care among patients receiving care at HIV specialty clinics. PATIENTS AND METHODS We conducted 6 focus group discussions with a total of 43 well-retained and less well-retained HIV+ patients in San Francisco, Seattle, and Birmingham, to elicit a wide range of perspectives on engagement in HIV care. Borrowing from the field of psychotherapy, we examined patient-provider relationship characteristics through the lens of the therapeutic alliance, and with regard to their therapeutic efficacy and impact on patient engagement. RESULTS The majority of participants emphasized how a strong patient-provider relationship defined by trust, intimacy, and collaboration promoted engagement, while a weak patient-provider relationship impeded engagement. CONCLUSION We discuss practical strategies and therapeutic techniques that may be helpful to providers in building strong patient-provider relationship and contend that a strong patient-provider relationship is crucial for patients to feel cared for during clinical encounters, which can promote long-term and sustained engagement in HIV care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Troy J Wood
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Correspondence: Troy J Wood, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, UCSF Box 0886, 550 16th Street, 3rd Floor, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA, Tel +1 415 476 6402, Email
| | - Kimberly A Koester
- AIDS Policy Research Center, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Katerina A Christopoulos
- Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, Division of HIV, ID and Global Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - John A Sauceda
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Torsten B Neilands
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Mallory O Johnson
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|