Emerging treatment options for the management of pemphigus vulgaris

Pemphigus relapse: Mechanisms, risk factors, and agents associated with disease recurrence

Pemphigus represents a spectrum of potentially life-threatening autoimmune-mediated skin blistering conditions caused by antibody production against desmoglein 1 and 3 (anti-DSG 1 and 3) in keratinocytes. Greater than 50% of pemphigus patients experience relapse, which complicates long-term medical management, including risks associated with re-treatment and complications such as infection and dehydration. This review aims to elucidate mechanisms, risk factors, and medications associated with pemphigus relapse. Mechanisms of relapse include the persistence of auto-reactive B-cell populations post-treatment and CD20- B-cell populations that reactivate after B-cell depletion therapy. Risk factors for relapse include high body surface area (BSA) of pemphigus involvement, high body mass index, high severity according to the Pemphigus Disease Area Index (PDAI) at onset, treatment delay, and high anti-DSG1 and DSG3 titers post-treatment. Targeted B-cell localization is associated with better clinical outcomes, including less frequent relapses. Rituximab is currently the gold standard of treatment for moderate-severe pemphigus and has relapse rates of 11%-44% in selected studies, with a mean time to relapse of 5.8 months to 36 months following treatment. Relapse rates across lymphoma dosing (375 mg/m2) versus rheumatoid arthritis dosing (1 g dosing weekly) was inconsistent; however, more frequent dosing, earlier treatment, and higher cumulative dosing were associated with lower relapse rates. Alternative agents that have clinical efficacy include corticosteroid monotherapy, mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine, and intravenous immunoglobulin. Future studies should include head-to-head comparators over long follow-up periods to identify the best treatment agents associated with the least relapse risk.

Steroid as a Saviour and Culprit in Pemphigus Vulgaris Therapy: A Rare Case Series

Introduction:

Pemphigus is a group of autoimmune dermatological life-threatening diseases of which Pemphigus Vulgaris (PV) is the most common (1-5 cases/million/year) with a mortality rate of 60-90%. PV is generally characterized by painful oral erosions, along with or without cutaneous lesions, as blisters are often misdiagnosed. The management strategy of PV includes steroids along with adjuvant therapy.

Case Presentation:

We report the case of three female patients with a mean age of 30.67 years who were diagnosed with pemphigus vulgaris and was on steroid therapy for a long duration. The longterm steroid therapy in all these three patients resulted in adverse drug reactions such as Cushing syndrome, oral and vaginal candidiasis. Although the steroid was found to cause ADR among these patients, the treatment with steroids and rituximab was continued. The withdrawal of steroids results in flare-up conditions, whereas the addition of rituximab serves as a steroid sparring partner in the management of PV. However, premedication was administered before the infusion of rituximab to prevent potential toxicity associated with rituximab. Further, administration of pulse therapy over oral dosing of steroids lowers the risks of ADR and long-term complications associated with steroids.

Conclusion:

As PV requires the management with high doses of steroids along with the immunosuppressant, patients are more prone to developing drug-related problems. Hence, the rigorous monitoring of the therapy is vital to prevent adverse effects of long-term therapy. Clinical pharmacists and pharmacologists are the most suitable pillar of the healthcare system for drug therapy management.

Management of auto-immune blistering disease in an older patient with severe intellectual disability

Management of chronic oral mucosal diseases might be challenging in older individuals with intellectual disability because of associated comorbidities, variable clinical presentations, and various barriers imposed by the intellectual disability. This report describes the presentation and management of pemphigus vulgaris in an older female with severe intellectual disability.

Rituximab in Pemphigus Vulgaris: A Review of Monoclonal Antibody Therapy in Dermatology

Pemphigus vulgaris (PV) is a rare autoimmune blistering disorder that primarily affects the skin and mucous membranes. Conventional treatments for PV, such as corticosteroids and immunosuppressive agents, have limitations in terms of efficacy and long-term safety. Monoclonal antibody therapy, specifically rituximab, has emerged as a promising therapeutic approach in the management of PV. This review article provides a comprehensive overview of rituximab in the treatment of PV, with a focus on its efficacy, safety profile, and immunological mechanisms of action. The article begins with an introduction to PV and the significance of monoclonal antibody therapy in dermatology. It then explores the clinical presentation and underlying immune-mediated mechanisms of PV, highlighting the autoimmune nature of the disease. The rationale for using monoclonal antibody therapy, particularly rituximab, in PV is discussed, emphasizing the limitations of conventional treatments and the concept of targeted therapy. The review delves into the efficacy and safety of rituximab based on clinical studies, evaluating disease remission rates, duration, and relapse rates. Furthermore, the immunological effects of rituximab, including B-cell depletion and modulation of the immune response, are explored in detail. Comparisons between rituximab and conventional treatment modalities in PV are made, assessing clinical outcomes, safety profiles, and long-term efficacy. Challenges and considerations in rituximab therapy are discussed, including factors influencing its efficacy, optimal dosing, treatment duration, and the need for maintenance therapy.

Scalp, Oral, and Nail Pemphigus Vulgaris: Clinical Characteristics and a Review of the Literature

Pemphigus vulgaris (PV) is a rare disease that affects the skin and mucous membranes, causing blistering and erosions. Identifying and effectively managing atypical presentations of pemphigus vulgaris can be challenging due to its rarity. We describe a 32-year-old male patient with a medical history including prediabetes, moderate asthma, hyperlipidemia, coccidioidomycosis, and respiratory infections. He was evaluated via telehealth in the allergy and immunology clinic for uncontrolled asthma. Initially, he complained of a whitish film in the mouth while on treatment with fluticasone and salmeterol. He also noted new vesicular lesions on his scalp and body. When evaluated later in the clinic, he was found to have oral and periungual erosions as well as paronychia. After promptly referring to dermatology, histopathological examination and direct immunofluorescence testing were performed on the patient's lesions, revealing changes consistent with PV. Treatment with prednisone and rituximab resulted in the complete resolution of the patient's bullae and nail deformities over several months. This case highlights the importance of a thorough evaluation of complex medical histories and diagnostic testing in managing asthma and allergy symptoms. It also emphasizes the need for a multidisciplinary approach involving specialists such as immunologists, dermatologists, and infectious disease experts in the diagnosis and management of complex cases.

An Overview of Clinical Manifestations of Dermatological Disorders in Intensive Care Units: What Should Intensivists Be Aware of?

Acute skin failure is rarely the primary diagnosis that necessitates admission to an intensive care unit. Dermatological manifestations in critically ill patients, on the other hand, are relatively common and can be used to make a key diagnosis of an adverse drug reaction or an underlying systemic illness, or they may be caused by factors related to a prolonged stay or invasive procedures. In intensive care units, their classification is based on the aetiopathogenesis of the cutaneous lesion and, in the meantime, distinguishes critical patients. When evaluating dermatological manifestations, several factors must be considered: onset, morphology, distribution, and associated symptoms and signs. This review depicts dermatological signs in critical patients in order to lay out better recognition.

Failure of double filtration plasmapheresis to treat severe pemphigus vulgaris: A case report

Pemphigus vulgaris (PV) is a chronic, mucocutaneous, autoimmune bullous disease. Double filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP) may be effective when PV fails to be controlled by conventional corticosteroid treatment. The patient was a 64-year-old man with erythema, blisters, and erosions on his head, face, mouth, trunk, limbs, and scrotum for over a month. He was diagnosed with severe PV, and the original rash area continued to expand after treatment with systemic corticosteroids, immunosuppressants, and intravenous immunoglobulin, with massive exudate and ≥5 new blisters and macules still occurring daily. Subsequently, the patient completed three sessions of DFPP. After the first DFPP, the original erosion surface exudate was significantly reduced and gradually healed. After the second DFPP, the erosion area and exudate increased compared with the previous one. After the third DFPP, the rash did not improve further and had a tendency to continue to progress. During the entire three sessions of DFPP, the patient had new blisters and bullae on his limbs every day. The Nikolsky's sign of the limbs turned negative at the initial stage, and then the trunk and limbs Nikolsky's sign became positive again. The titer of autoantibodies did not decrease significantly after the plasmapheresis. The patient eventually died of secondary lung infection and septic shock. The efficacy of DFPP in this patient with refractory severe PV was poor.

Burden of pemphigus vulgaris with a particular focus on women: A review

Pemphigus vulgaris is a chronic autoimmune mucocutaneous blistering disorder. Apart from the disease itself, other aspects of patients' life, including psychological, social, and financial, can be affected. Women are particularly more disposed to the impact of the disease due to their physiological characteristics, the specific periods of pregnancy and lactation as well as their social and familial role. In this review, we summarized the burden of pemphigus vulgaris on various aspects of women's lives. It is essential to understand these problems and provide appropriate support for patients with such a burdensome disease.

Pain management of pemphigus vulgaris

Pemphigus is a rare autoimmune bullous disease which affects the mucous membranes and skin. Pemphigus vulgaris (PV) is the most prevalent type of pemphigus. PV presents with extremely painful, non-healing oral erosions. However, there are only a handful of reports addressing the pain management of PV. We would like to present a case of a painful PV, which was successfully managed.

Desquamative Gingivitis in the Context of Autoimmune Bullous Dermatoses and Lichen Planus-Challenges in the Diagnosis and Treatment

Desquamative gingivitis (DG) is a clinical term that describes erythema, desquamation and erosions of the gingiva, of various etiologies. Although the clinical aspect is not specific for a certain disease, an accurate diagnosis of the underlying disorder is necessary because the disease course, prognosis and treatment vary according to the cause. DG may inflict significant oral discomfort, which is why patients typically present to the dentist for a first consultation, rendering it important for these specialists to be informed about this condition. Our paper aims to review the ethiopatogenesis and diagnostic approach of DG, focusing on the most common underlying disorders (autoimmune bullous dermatoses and lichen planus) and on the management of these patients. Potential etiological agents leading to an inflammatory immune response in the oral mucosa and DG appearance include genetic predisposition, metabolic, neuropsychiatric, infectious factors, medication, dental materials, graft-versus-host reaction and autoimmunity. A thorough anamnesis, a careful clinical examination, paraclinical explorations including histopathological exam and direct immunofluorescence are necessary to formulate an appropriate diagnosis. Proper and prompt management of these patients lead to a better prognosis and improved quality of life, and must include management in the dental office with sanitizing the oral cavity, instructing the patient for rigorous oral hygiene, periodic follow-up for bacterial plaque detection and removal, as well as topical and systemic therapy depending on the underlying disorder, based on treatment algorithms. A multidisciplinary approach for the diagnosis and follow-up of DG in the context of pemphigus vulgaris, bullous pemphigoid, cicatricial pemhigoid or lichen planus is necessary, including consultations with dermatologists, oral medicine specialists and dentists.

Pemphigus during the COVID-19 Epidemic: Infection Risk, Vaccine Responses and Management Strategies

Pemphigus is a rare autoimmune blistering disease, involving potentially life-threatening conditions often requiring immunosuppression. Currently, the COVID-19 pandemic caused by severe acute respiratory disease coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection has become a global public emergency. Vaccines are the most effective defense against COVID-19 infection. However, in clinic, there are cases of new onset or flare of pemphigus following COVID-19 vaccination, where vaccines have manifested significantly desirable risk-benefit profiles for patients. Although Rituximab, as first-line therapy, may impair humoral immunity, pemphigus may not predispose to develop COVID-19 infection compared to a healthy population. Conversely, delay or interruption of immunosuppressants probably results in unfavorable clinical outcomes for disease progression. Overall, clinicians should encourage their patients to undergo the vaccination after a comprehensive assessment. The definite association between COVID-19 vaccination and pemphigus remains to be further elucidated. Herein, we provide an overview of the published studies to date on COVID-19 and pemphigus as well as the exploration of their complicated interplay. In addition, we discuss the management strategies for pemphigus patients in this special period, in an effort to more effectively establish a standard treatment paradigm for this particular patient group.

Immunotherapy for Pemphigus: Present and Future

Pemphigus is a chronic and severe autoimmune bullous disease caused by autoantibodies targeting adhesion molecules between keratinocytes. It requires 2–3 years on average to manage the disease. To date, although Rituximab combined with short-term systemic glucocorticoids was accepted as first-line therapy, systemic glucocorticoids remain the primary therapeutic option for pemphigus patients, successfully decreasing morbidity and mortality from pemphigus. However, novel therapeutic strategies are desirable due to the low efficacy in some subset of patients and the long-term severe adverse effects of traditional therapies. Recently, immunotherapy has proved to be encouraging for disease control or cure. Based on the current understanding of the immune mechanisms of pemphigus, we review the immune targets and corresponding agents applied in practice or under clinical trials. The goals of the novel treatments are to improve the quality of life of pemphigus patients by improving efficacy and safety, minimizing side effects, achieving fast disease control, or curing the disease.

A rare new presentation of pemphigus vulgaris

We report a new presentation for pemphigus vulgaris in a 51-year-old female patient that was complaining only from non-healing foot ulcer, but unfortunately pemphigus was not confirmed and the patient lost multiple nails. This new variation is reported to increase health workers' awareness especially in races pemphigus seems to be common.

Immunohistochemical Expression of Regulatory T Cells (CD4 + CD25 + bright FOXP3 + ) in Pemphigus patients

BACKGROUND

Pemphigus is a series of autoimmune skin disorders caused by IgG. Regulatory T cells (Tregs) are a subset of CD4+ T cells that mostly block pathogenic immune responses mediated by self-reactive cells, therefore a lack of Tregs or a malfunction in their activity could lead to a loss of tolerance and the development of autoimmunity. .

AIMS

to evaluate the expression of lesional and perilesional Treg markers (CD4+ CD25+ bright FOXP3+) in pemphigus patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty three pemphigus patients and 20 healthy controls were included in this study. The expression of CD4, CD25 and Foxp3 were evaluated by immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

There was statistically significant increase in CD4+ T lymphocytes in lesional skin of pemphigus compared to perilesional skin and control group (P-value: 0.001). There was statistically significant decrease in CD25+ and Foxp3+ cells in lesional skin compared to perilesional and control group (P-value: <0.001, 0.025 respectively ).

CONCLUSION

The reduction of lesional skin Tregs may play an important role in the pemphigus pathogenesis.

Gefitinib induced Pemphigus Vulgaris with PRIDE complex

Introduction: Pemphigus Vulgaris is a rare, noncommunicable, non-hereditary fatal autoimmune dermatological manifestation in which a painful blister initiates from the oral cavity. PRIDE complex stands for Papulopustules or paronychia, regulatory abnormality of hair and nails, itching, and dryness due to inhibition of EGFR. Both of these mucocutaneous manifestations are rare and are often caused by drugs. Case report: Our case reports 53-year-old patient presented with multiple crusted plaques, multiple hyperpigmented macules to patches, Solitary fluid-filled lesions on several parts of the body, and numerous erosions positive over buccal mucosa on initial follow up which was diagnosed as Pemphigus Vulgaris with PRIDE complex induced by Gefitinib. Management and outcome: The patient was treated with almost all possible treatment options, i.e., both steroids plus adjuvant therapy for pemphigus and antihistaminic, antibiotics, moisturizer, and lotions for PRIDE complex. The patient was initially admitted for infusion of the first dose of rituximab and later for management of flare-up condition and infusion of the second dose of rituximab infusion. Discussion: The complexity of the management of Pemphigus Vulgaris and PRIDE complex demands adequate monitoring of the patient's anti-cancerous therapy by clinical pharmacists, which can impact the clinical outcomes by providing pharmaceutical care and minimize the economic burden.

The demographic attributes, clinical features, and optimal management of 143 patients with pemphigus: A retrospective observational study from a tertiary care center of India

Background:

This retrospective study was to understand the clinico-epidemiologic and therapeutic aspects of pemphigus patients attending our clinic.

Methods:

We analyzed charts of 143 (M: F; 51:92) pemphigus patients having variable severity recorded between 2009 and 2019. Therapies were customized based on patient's age, disease severity, comorbidities, compliance prospects, and affordability. The patients were monitored monthly and as needed for therapeutic outcome in terms of disease control, reduced hospitalization, remission/relapse, and drug toxicity.

Results:

These patients were aged 15 to 86 years, the majority, 68 (47.5%), was 41 to 60 years of age. The pemphigus vulgaris in 83.9% patients was the commonest variant. Treatment regimens were; dexamethasone-cyclophosphamide-pulse (DCP) therapy in 51.2%, dexamethasone-azathioprine-pulse (DAP) therapy in 11%, dexamethasone-pulse (DP) therapy in 5.5%, rituximab in 24.4%, IVIg in 5.5% patients, and oral corticosteroids with or without adjuvant. Remission occurred after 2–17 (mean 5.8) DCP doses; 14 and 7 patients achieved remission for ≥2 y and ≥5 y, respectively. Rituximab was effective to treat both new and relapsed cases (n = 31). Additional treatment with another adjuvant prolonged remission in seven patients relapsed 12–16 months after treatment with rituximab alone. Overall, oral corticosteroids alone and DAP therapy showed unsatisfactory response. Adverse effects seen in 41.9% of patients were mainly corticosteroids related.

Conclusion:

The overall clinico-epidemiologic spectrum of pemphigus and therapeutic efficacy of DCP, DAP, or corticosteroids in this study was in sync with the literature. Combining rituximab and corticosteroids plus an immunomodulator initially (phase-1), followed by immunomodulator alone for one year (phase-2) will improve long-term (phase-3) therapeutic outcome. IVIg was effectively useful in patients with concurrent infections.

Simultaneous Oral and Umbilical Locations as a First Sign of Pemphigus Vulgaris

The place of pemphigus vulgaris (PV) among autoimmune bullous diseases (AIBD) is well established. It is an acquired chronic, autoimmune, vesiculobullous disease in which IgG antibodies target desmosomal proteins to produce intraepithelial mucocutaneous blistering. The diagnosis is often challenging for the clinicians. It requires a combination of three major features: clinical, histopathological, and immunological. Clinically, oral lesions are the first manifestations of the disease in 50-90% of the patients with widespread blisters affecting the oral mucosa. On the skin, lesions are characterized by flaccid blisters that rapidly progress into erosions and crust formation. Umbilical lesions as a clinical manifestation of PV are peculiar and have rarely been reported, and they are not yet completely elucidated. Umbilical region involvement in patients with pemphigus was assessed in a limited study totalling just 10 patients. This localisation may be a valuable hint easing the diagnosis at the clinical level for patients with oral mucosal blisters. Dentists must be familiar with the clinical manifestations of PV to make an early diagnosis and start an early treatment which determines the prognosis of the disease. To the best of the authors' knowledge, the coexistence of these lesions with the oral lesions as a first sign of PV in the absence of skin involvement was reported in only one case of pemphigus vegetans (PVe). In this paper, we describe an observation of a female patient that was diagnosed with PV that begun with simultaneous oral and umbilical locations which coexisted for a period of 4 months before the appearance of other cutaneous lesions. We highlight the role of dentists, by being familiar with the clinical manifestations of PV, to make an early diagnosis to start an early treatment which determines the prognosis of the disease and to follow closely the evolution of lesions to change treatment if required. We also discuss the clinical, histological, and immunological features of the disease that enabled the differential diagnosis as well as the appropriate therapeutic management.

Pain Management in Patients with Severe Pemphigus Vulgaris

To describe the pain management and clinical course of patients with severe Pemphigus Vulgaris (PV) admitted to a third-level Intensive Care Unit (ICU). This was a retrospective cohort study conducted in the Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán over the period 2013-2020. Study population comprised patients with severe PV admitted to the ICU. Eleven patients with severe PV were included. Mean age of presentation was 43.6 years. Percentage of the total body surface area affected ranged from 70 to 85% (mean: 80%). Visual Analogue Scale was used for pain assessment upon admission. Nine patients (72%) reported a 10/10 pain. The median Morphine Equivalent Daily Dose was 200 mg (range: 90-518 mg). Mortality was 27% during the ICU stay. One patient (9%) continued to experience severe pain and consume opioids after discharge. PV is a life-threatening disease characterized by painful, persistent erosions and ulcers. Integrated and multidisciplinary approach is often required. Opioids remain the mainstay for acute pain control in patients with severe PV. Biological, psychological, and social factors influence patients' daily opioid requirements and dose escalation. Successful pain management contributes to improving the quality of life, and the suppression and remission of PV.

Comparison of Guidelines for Management of Pemphigus: a Review of Systemic Corticosteroids, Rituximab, and Other Immunosuppressive Therapies

Pemphigus is a severe autoimmune bullous dermatosis that affects the skin and/or mucosa, and it may be life-threatening without proper treatment. The guidelines and/or consensus statements for treatment vary widely between groups. We selected 6 guidelines and consensus statements established by different associations about the management of pemphigus vulgaris (PV) and/or pemphigus foliaceus (PF) to review, compare, and contrast the similarities and differences of these recommendations and provide optimal management suggestions to physicians. Corticosteroids remain a first-line therapy for pemphigus, but there are many differences in initial dose, tapering schedule, and management of relapse between different guidelines. Rituximab is a monoclonal antibody targeting CD20-positive B lymphocytes that is approved as a first-line therapy in moderate-to-severe pemphigus. Immunosuppressive agents, such as azathioprine (AZA) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), are also widely used as corticosteroid-sparing drugs, but the adjuvant applications and dosage regimens of different recommendations are not standardized. We attribute these differences to the clinical scoring adopted, the standards for disease severity evaluation, the publication year of each guideline, and local and regional healthcare differences.

Biologics in autoimmune bullous diseases: Current scenario

Autoimmune bullous diseases can be intraepidermal (pemphigus group of disorders) or subepidermal (pemphigoid group of disorders). The treatment of these disorders chiefly comprises corticosteroids and immunosuppressant adjuvants like azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetil. Autoantibodies are the main mediators of these diseases. Rituximab, a chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody targeting B-cells, has emerged as an excellent treatment option for refractory pemphigus vulgaris in the last decade. Since then, many new biologics have been proposed/explored for managing autoimmune bullous diseases. These hold potential for greater efficacy and lesser adverse effects than conventional immunosuppressants. In this review, we discuss the role of various biologics in the treatment of autoimmune bullous diseases, followed by a brief discussion on the drawbacks to their use and new developments in this area.

Therapeutic approaches and targets for treatment of autoimmune bullous diseases

Autoimmune bullous diseases are a heterogeneous group of diseases characterized by the development of cutaneous and mucosal vesicles, blisters, and finally erosions. The common pathogenetic mechanism is the presence of autoantibodies targeting structural proteins of the skin and mucous membranes (demosomes and hemidesmosomes): in the case of pemphigus, the antigens are intraepidermal, whereas in the case of pemphigoid, dermatitis herpetiformis, and epidermolysis bullosa acquisita they are subepidermal. Mucosal involvement typically affects the oral and ocular mucosa, but in some cases, the upper airways or the upper digestive tract are affected. The burden on patients' lives could be severe due to the impairment of normal feeding or breathing. In other cases, they may represent paraneoplastic syndromes. Since autoimmune bullous diseases may result in significant morbidity and mortality, depending on the grade of cutaneous and mucosal involvement, a prompt therapeutic approach is mandatory and, in recalcitrant cases, may be challenging. The first line therapy consists of corticosteroids, both topical and systemic. Once remission or control of the acute phase is obtained, adjuvant therapies need to be introduced in order to spare the corticosteroid load and minimize side effects such as iatrogenic diabetes or osteoporosis. Herein, we describe all current therapeutic approaches to autoimmune bullous diseases, also including emerging therapies.

The evolving role of rituximab in the treatment of pemphigus vulgaris: a comprehensive state-of-the-art review

INTRODUCTION

Pemphigus vulgaris (PV) is a life-threatening autoimmune mucocutaneous blistering disease. Systemic corticosteroids (CS), while life-saving, have several serious side effects. To improve treatment and prognosis, recently rituximab (RTX), a chimeric monoclonal antibody against CD20 molecule on B cells, has become popular. This Expert Opinion discusses clinical and scientifically relevant aspects of RTX treating PV.

AREA COVERED

This presentation describes the mechanism of action, clinical efficacy, safety, adverse events, protocols used, and clinical outcomes. Concerns for infection, reactivation of latent or previous infections, and high relapse rate are discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

Use of RTX in PV is still a work in progress. There are many unanswered questions. FDA did not provide a protocol or guidelines. Whenever RTX is used, systemic corticosteroids are simultaneously used, albeit for a shorter duration and lower dose. Used in these doses for these durations they can cause immunosuppression. Would it be more appropriate if instead of 'First Line Therapy' it would be more advisable to use the term 'First Adjunctive Immunosuppressive Agent'?

Modulation of Mechanical Stress Mitigates Anti-Dsg3 Antibody-Induced Dissociation of Cell-Cell Adhesion

It is becoming increasingly clear that mechanical stress in adhesive junctions plays a significant role in dictating the fate of cell-cell attachment under physiological conditions. Targeted disruption of cell-cell junctions leads to multiple pathological conditions, among them the life-threatening autoimmune blistering disease pemphigus vulgaris (PV). The dissociation of cell-cell junctions by autoantibodies is the hallmark of PV, however, the detailed mechanisms that result in tissue destruction remain unclear. Thus far, research and therapy in PV have focused primarily on immune mechanisms upstream of autoantibody binding, while the biophysical aspects of the cell-cell dissociation process leading to acantholysis are less well studied. In work aimed at illuminating the cellular consequences of autoantibody attachment, it is reported that externally applied mechanical stress mitigates antibody-induced monolayer fragmentation and inhibits p38 MAPK phosphorylation activated by anti-Dsg3 antibody. Further, it is demonstrated that mechanical stress applied externally to cell monolayers enhances cell contractility via RhoA activation and promotes the strengthening of cortical actin, which ultimately mitigates antibody-induced cell-cell dissociation. The study elevates understanding of the mechanism of acantholysis in PV and shifts the paradigm of PV disease development from a focus solely on immune pathways to highlight the key role of physical transformations at the target cell.

Therapy Changes During Pemphigus Management: A Retrospective Analysis

Pemphigus diseases are rare, and the treatment response differs between patients. Several therapy changes are often required to achieve disease control and avoid unwanted side effects. We aimed to analyze the treatment courses of pemphigus patients and the clinical responses regarding therapy changes. Pemphigus patients in our center were retrospectively examined according to the medication and dosage, disease activity, reason for treatment changes, and autoantibody concentrations. Therapy changes due to insufficient therapeutic effects or side effects were analyzed. Seventy-seven pemphigus patients with repeated consultations were identified (81% pemphigus vulgaris, 19% pemphigus foliaceus). Disease control was achieved in 66 patients (86%; score “almost clear” or “clear”), with an average of 4 different therapy regimens (range 1–18 changes), after an average of 2 years of treatment (range 0–11 years). Twenty-two patients (29%) with refractory disease received rituximab, of which 19 (86%) subsequently achieved remission. Anti-desmoglein-1 and−3 concentrations correlated with disease severity, but not with the number of treatment changes. The identification of an effective and safe therapy for the individual pemphigus patient is a challenge and often requires time, which is reflected by a high number of therapy changes. Predictive parameters are warranted to directly identify the safest and most efficient treatment regimen for an individual patient.

Nocardiosis in a patient with pemphigus foliaceus treated with rituximab

Rituximab is a chimeric human/murine monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody. This agent is an effective therapeutic option in severe types of pemphigus. However, rituximab may cause opportunistic infections if used in immunosuppressed patients. We reported a case of diffuse Nocardia infection following rituximab treatment in pemphigus foliaceus. Rheumatoid arthritis protocol applied in our patient. Rituximab was used at a dose of 1000 mg every 2 weeks. Because the disease was not adequately controlled, rituximab treatment was administered six times every 15 days. One week after the sixth dose of the rituximab, she presented lassitude and multiple palpable masses in soft tissue of the upper extremity. Thereafter, the aspirate culture of the abscess on the left shoulder was taken and confirmed to be disseminated nocardiosis. She was treated with linezolid and meropenem for 1 month; however, amikacin was added because the patient did not respond adequately to linezolid and meropenem therapy. The patient died of cardiac arrest because of her comorbidities. In this case, prolonged administration of rituximab therapy may have caused the development of nocardiosis. Therefore, all patients should have a sensible balance of risk and benefit, considering the use of rituximab.

Patients with pemphigus are at an increased risk of developing rheumatoid arthritis: a large-scale cohort study

Data regarding the association between pemphigus and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is inconclusive and yet to be firmly established. In the current study, we aimed to evaluate the risk of developing RA during the course of pemphigus. A large-scale population-based longitudinal cohort study was conducted to evaluate the hazard ratio (HR) of RA among 1985 patients with pemphigus relative to 9874 age-, sex-, and ethnicity-matched control subjects. A multivariate Cox regression model was utilized. The incidence of RA was 1.07 (95% CI, 0.62-1.72) and 0.36 (95% CI, 0.24-0.52) per 1000 person-years among patients with pemphigus and controls, respectively. The lifetime prevalence of RA was 2.3% (95% CI, 1.7-3.1%) among cases and 1.8% (95% CI, 1.5-2.0%) among controls. Patients with pemphigus were more than twice as likely to develop RA as compared to control subjects (adjusted HR, 2.54; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.31-4.92). The increased risk was robust to a sensitivity analysis that included only cases managed by pemphigus-related systemic medications (adjusted HR, 2.56; 95% CI, 1.30-5.05). In conclusion, pemphigus is associated with an increased risk of RA. Physicians treating patients with pemphigus should be aware of this possible association. Further research is required to better understand the mechanism underlying this association.

Rituximab: A Review in Pemphigus Vulgaris

Rituximab (MabThera^®, Rituxan^®), a chimeric murine/human anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody administered by intravenous infusion, is indicated for the treatment of moderate to severe pemphigus vulgaris (PV), in combination with a tapering course of corticosteroids. Approval in the EU and USA was based on data for the subset of patients with newly-diagnosed, previously untreated PV participating in the randomized, controlled RITUX 3 study; rituximab plus short-course prednisone resulted in a > 3-fold higher rate of complete remission off prednisone therapy and a > 2-fold decrease in the rate of moderate/severe relapse compared with standard-dose prednisone in this patient subpopulation. In addition, rituximab plus short-term prednisone was steroid-sparing and resulted in fewer patients experiencing grade 3 or 4 corticosteroid-related adverse events compared with standard-dose prednisone. The adverse event profile of rituximab in patients with PV was consistent with that observed for the drug in other approved autoimmune disorders; no new safety concerns were identified. Notwithstanding there is some uncertainty over the optimum dosing schedule to achieve and maintain disease control, rituximab is a highly effective and generally well tolerated, steroid-sparing treatment for moderate to severe PV.

[Use of rituximab in maintenance treatment of pemphigus: A retrospective series]

INTRODUCTION

Rituximab (RTX), currently recommended as first-line treatment in moderate to severe pemphigus vulgaris (PV) and superficial pemphigus (PS) along with initial systemic steroids, may also be used as second-line or subsequent treatment, and this therapeutic strategy was investigated in a real-life monocentre retrospective survey.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

All patients treated between January 2010 and March 2018 with RTX as second-line or subsequent treatment for moderate to severe PV or PS and followed for at least one year were included. The main objective was to evaluate rates and times of complete clinical remission (CCR) after a first course of RTX. The secondary objectives consisted mainly of treatment safety, and frequency and time to relapse after the initial CCR.

RESULTS

The 24 patients selected received on average 2 cycles of RTX (i.e. 24 initial cycles and 24 additional cycles in all) over a mean follow-up period of 45 months. 18/24 (75%) patients achieved initial CCR within a mean 7.7 months. Despite at least one relapse in 13/18 initially responding patients regardless of relapse time, 59% (14/24) and 33% (8/24) were either in CCR and off treatment, or in partial remission, whether treated or untreated, according to the latest patient news, with an overall response rate of 92%. Safety was fair in these fragile patients.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

This survey of the practical use of RTX confirms its interest in moderate to severe pemphigus as a second-line or subsequent treatment, a situation that probably remains relevant even if this molecule is increasingly used as first-line therapy.

Post-rituximab immunoglobulin M (IgM) hypogammaglobulinemia

Rituximab is a B cell depleting monoclonal antibody that targets the B cell-specific cell surface antigen CD20 and is currently used to treat several autoimmune diseases. The elimination of mature CD20-positive B lymphocytes committed to differentiate into autoantibody-producing plasma cells is considered to be the major effect of rituximab, that makes it a beneficial biological agent in treating autoimmune diseases. Hypogammaglobulinemia has been reported after rituximab therapy in patients with lymphoma and rheumatoid arthritis. Similar data are scarce for other autoimmune diseases. Low immunoglobulin G (IgG) or hypogammaglobulinemia has attracted the most attention because of its significant role in protective immunity. However, the incidence and clinical implications of low immunoglobulin M (IgM) or hypogammaglobulinemia have not been studied in detail. This review will focus on the frequency and the clinical concerns of low IgM levels that result as a consequence of the administration of rituximab. The etiopathogenic mechanisms underlying post-rituximab IgM hypogammaglobulinemia and its implications are presented. The long-term consequences, if any, are not known or documented. Multiple factors may be involved in whether IgG or IgM decreases secondary to rituximab therapy. It is possible that the autoimmune disease itself may be one of the important factors. The dose, frequency and number of infusions appear to be important variables. Post-rituximab therapy immunoglobulin levels return to normal. During this process. IgM levels take a longer time to return to normal levels when compared to IgG or other immunoglobulins. IgM deficiency persists after B cell repopulation to normal levels has occurred. Laboratory animals and humans deficient in IgM can have multiple infections. Specific pharmacologic agents or biologic therapy that address and resolve IgM deficiency are currently unavailable. If the clinical situation so warrants, then prophylactic antibiotics may be indicated and perhaps helpful. Research in this iatrogenic phenomenon will provide a better understanding of not only the biology of IgM, but also the factor(s) that control its production and regulation, besides its influence if any, on rituximab therapy.

Pemphigus Vulgaris: Short Time to Relapse in Patients Treated in a Danish Tertiary Referral Center

Pemphigus vulgaris is an autoimmune skin disorder with development of blisters in the skin and mucosa, and it can be a life-threatening disease if not treated. Corticosteroids have been a cornerstone for treating PV, but because of side effects the treatment is combined with other conventional immune modulating drugs and rituximab. The Danish treatment protocol for pemphigus vulgaris is similar to the other Scandinavian countries, and therefore this study is of importance for clinicians in the Scandinavian countries as well as other European countries. We retrospectively identified all patients with Pemphigus vulgaris in our tertiary center over a 7-year period in order to register patient characteristics, treatment, adverse events, comorbidities and the effect of prednisolone dose on remission. In this study 19 patients met the inclusion criteria and remission was seen after a mean of 19.9 weeks, and relapse was seen in 50% after the mean time of 15 weeks. Time to relapse in our study is relatively short compared to studies in which rituximab is used as a first-line drug in treating pemphigus vulgaris.

Pemphigus vulgaris - approach and management

The place of pemphigus vulgaris (PV) among autoimmune bullous dermatoses is well known. In pemphigus, IgG autoantibodies are directed against desmogleins 1 and 3, which are part of the cadherin family of cell-cell adhesion molecules. These structures are responsible for maintaining the intercellular adherence in stratified squamous epithelia, such as the skin and oral mucosa. The incidence of autoimmune bullous dermatoses is steadily increasing, being associated with a high degree of morbidity. The pathophysiology of these dermatoses is very well understood, complemented by recent genetic studies. The gold standard for the diagnosis of pemphigus vulgaris is the detection of autoantibodies or complement component 3 by direct immunofluorescence microscopy of a perilesional biopsy. Early diagnosis and initiation of treatment are necessary in order to achieve a favorable prognosis. Although the first line of treatment is corticotherapy, there are no clear guidelines on dosing regimens, and long-term adverse effects are important. Corticosteroid-sparing adjuvant therapies have been employed in the treatment of PV, aiming to reduce the necessary cumulative dose of corticosteroids. In addition, therapies with anti-CD20 antibodies are used, but antigen-specific immune suppression-based treatments represent the future.

From bench to bedside: evolving therapeutic targets in autoimmune blistering disease

Autoimmune blistering diseases comprise a group of heterogenous conditions characterized by the loss of tolerance and subsequent development of autoantibodies targeting epidermal and subepidermal adhesion proteins. Blisters and erosions form on the skin and mucous membranes leading to significant morbidity and mortality. Traditional therapies rely on systemic immunosuppression. Advancements in our understanding of the pathophysiology of pemphigus and pemphigoid have led to the development of molecules which target specific pathways involved in induction and perpetuation of disease. In this review, we outline the novel therapeutic strategies including B-cell depletion, T-regulatory cell repletion, cell signalling inhibitors and small molecular inhibitors, inhibitory monoclonal antibodies, as well as complement inhibition. We additionally review their current level of clinical evidence. We lastly review therapeutics targets gleaned from the experimental epidermolysis bullosa acquisita mouse model. These emerging treatments offer an exciting progression from basic science discoveries that have the potential to transform the treatment paradigm in autoimmune blistering diseases.

Treatment of pemphigus vulgaris: part 1 - current therapies

Introduction: While biologic agents that can be used for treating pemphigus vulgaris (PV) are increasing, themajority of the world's PV patients can afford only corticosteroids (CS) and some immunosuppressive agents (ISA). Areas covered: The spectrum of side effects encountered when PV patients receive high-dose, long-term CS and ISA are presented based on total dose and duration of therapy. The steroid-sparing effect of individual ISA as documented in published studies and their clinical outcomes, in terms of duration of remissions, frequency of relapses and time to relapse, are presented, so that comparisons are possible. Thus, rational choices can be made for the individual patient. Expert opinion: In 2019, the majority of PV patients globally will continue to be treated with CS and ISA. This review will help clinicians and patients become aware of when to anticipate which side effects and if possible, to prevent or avoid them. It provides guidelines to maximize the clinical benefits of ISA in inducing and maintaining remission and minimizing side effects by monitoring them.

Treatment of pemphigus vulgaris: part 2 - emerging therapies

Introduction: Corticosteroids and immunosuppressive agents have been the mainstay for the treatment of pemphigus vulgaris (PV). While they have benefited patients, they have been associated with the risks of prolonged immune suppression and a high incidence of significant and catastrophic side effects. Relapses are common. Novel agents promising targeted therapies, that may provide better outcomes, are being studied. Areas covered: Recently rituximab with corticosteroids has been recommended as the first-line treatment for PV. A number of known and new therapeutic agents currently investigated are BAFF, P13K, BTK inhibitors along with the use of IVIg and CAR-T therapy. The possible role of these therapeutic targets in the pathophysiology appears to be the rationale for the treatment of this potentially fatal disease. Expert opinion: While there is significant enthusiasm for these therapies, certain concerns and consequences are being under-discussed. None of the current clinical trials in progress are specific for PV, except possibly CAR-T therapy. The major issue(s) that are unclear is whether these therapies would be successful in providing long-term clinical remissions. Will these therapies require additional agents to be effective? Will the benefits be limited in duration? The answers to many questions will determine their final place in the algorithm for the treatment of PV.

Pemphigus: Current and Future Therapeutic Strategies

Pemphigus encompasses a heterogeneous group of autoimmune blistering diseases, which affect both mucous membranes and the skin. The disease usually runs a chronic-relapsing course, with a potentially devastating impact on the patients' quality of life. Pemphigus pathogenesis is related to IgG autoantibodies targeting various adhesion molecules in the epidermis, including desmoglein (Dsg) 1 and 3, major components of desmosomes. The pathogenic relevance of such autoantibodies has been largely demonstrated experimentally. IgG autoantibody binding to Dsg results in loss of epidermal keratinocyte adhesion, a phenomenon referred to as acantholysis. This in turn causes intra-epidermal blistering and the clinical appearance of flaccid blisters and erosions at involved sites. Since the advent of glucocorticoids, the overall prognosis of pemphigus has largely improved. However, mortality persists elevated, since long-term use of high dose corticosteroids and adjuvant steroid-sparing immunosuppressants portend a high risk of serious adverse events, especially infections. Recently, rituximab, a chimeric anti CD20 monoclonal antibody which induces B-cell depletion, has been shown to improve patients' survival, as early rituximab use results in higher disease remission rates, long term clinical response and faster prednisone tapering compared to conventional immunosuppressive therapies, leading to its approval as a first line therapy in pemphigus. Other anti B-cell therapies targeting B-cell receptor or downstream molecules are currently tried in clinical studies. More intriguingly, a preliminary study in a preclinical mouse model of pemphigus has shown promise regarding future therapeutic application of Chimeric Autoantibody Receptor T-cells engineered using Dsg domains to selectively target autoreactive B-cells. Conversely, previous studies from our group have demonstrated that B-cell depletion in pemphigus resulted in secondary impairment of T-cell function; this may account for the observed long-term remission following B-cell recovery in rituximab treated patients. Likewise, our data support the critical role of Dsg-specific T-cell clones in orchestrating the inflammatory response and B-cell activation in pemphigus. Monitoring autoreactive T-cells in patients may indeed provide further information on the role of these cells, and would be the starting point for designating therapies aimed at restoring the lost immune tolerance against Dsg. The present review focuses on current advances, unmet challenges and future perspectives of pemphigus management.

Skin Barrier and Autoimmunity-Mechanisms and Novel Therapeutic Approaches for Autoimmune Blistering Diseases of the Skin

One of the most important functions of the skin besides regulating internal body temperature includes formation of the barrier between the organism and the external environment, hence protecting against pathogen invasion, chemical and physical assaults and unregulated loss of water and solutes. Disruption of the protective barrier is observed clinically in blisters and erosions of the skin that form in autoimmune blistering diseases where the body produces autoantibodies against structural proteins of the epidermis or the epidermal-dermal junction. Although there is no cure for autoimmune skin blistering diseases, immune suppressive therapies currently available offer opportunities for disease management. In cases where no treatment is sought, these disorders can lead to life threatening complications and current research efforts have focused on developing therapies that target autoantibodies which contribute to disease symptoms. This review will outline the involvement of the skin barrier in main skin-specific autoimmune blistering diseases by describing the mechanisms underpinning skin autoimmunity and review current progress in development of novel therapeutic approaches targeting the underlying causes of autoimmune skin blistering diseases.

Pharmacological advances in pemphigus

This is an updated review of the literature on the emerging therapeutic options for the treatment of pemphigus to provide better care for patients. There is an increasing range of molecules targeted for pemphigus therapy against CD20, Bruton tyrosine kinase, chimeric antigen receptor, T-cell immune components, B-cell activating factor, proliferation-inducing ligand (APRIL), CD25, p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (p38MAPK) and cytokine modulation therapies (anti-IL-4, anti-IL-6). The main aim of the current new therapies is to provide specific pathology-focused therapeutic options which have long-term sustainable therapeutic effects on disease progress, cause less side effects without systemic immunosuppression, and have less risk of getting antibodies against the medication during treatment.

[Therapy of pemphigus]

BACKGROUND

Pemphigus diseases are a heterogeneous group of potentially life-threatening autoimmune bullous disorders. Therefore, rapidly acting and effective therapeutic approaches are essential.

OBJECTIVES

In this review, current therapeutic options in line with available guidelines are presented and new therapeutic approaches are discussed.

METHODS

A literature search was performed using PubMed.

RESULTS

Treatment of pemphigus is based on systemic glucocorticosteroids, frequently combined with potentially corticosteroid-sparing immunosuppressants such as azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetil/mycophenolic acid. Recently, the impressive efficacy of the anti-CD20 antibody rituximab has been shown in a prospective randomized trial. In severe or treatment-refractory cases, immunoadsorption or high-dose intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) are recommended. Adjuvant immunoadsorption also seems to be useful within the first 8-12 weeks of therapy in patients with very high autoantibody levels. A variety of new therapeutic approaches is currently evaluated in phase IIa studies.

CONCLUSION

Therapy of pemphigus has been greatly improved by the employment of rituximab. The use of glucocorticosteroids, associated with a high number of adverse events and elevated mortality, could be reduced by the additional use of rituximab. After approval of rituximab for the treatment of pemphigus by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2018, licensing in Europe is expected in 2019.

The role of pentraxin 3 in pemphigus vulgaris

Introduction

Pemphigus is a group of autoimmune bullous diseases caused by antibodies directed against the desmosomal adhesion molecules desmoglein 1 and 3, which are required for intercellular adhesion of keratinocytes. Pentraxins are a group of proteins that function as pattern recognition molecules and also play a role in humoral innate immunity. Pentraxin 3 (PTX3) is the prototype of the long pentraxins and has been shown to be increased in numerous autoimmune diseases.

Aim

To investigate whether PTX3 can be used as a marker of PV caused by autoimmunity and resulting in tissue injury.

Material and methods

The study included 30 patients who presented to the University Medical School Dermatology Department and were diagnosed with PV based on clinical, histological, and immunological findings. The control group included 30 healthy individuals. Human PTX3 concentration was measured with a commercially available ELISA kit, using a double antibody sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

Results

The 60 participants comprised 31 (52%) men and 29 (48%) women. The most common site of onset was mucosa + skin (n = 22; 73.3%) and a psychological pathology was present in 7 (23.3%) patients. Median PTX3 level was significantly higher in the PV group compared to the control group (p = 0.008). The ROC curve analysis indicated a significant area under curve (AUC) value for serum PTX3 level in the prediction of PV.

Conclusions

PTX3 was found to be increased in PV and PTX3 could be a useful indicator of disease activity in PV.