Increased risk of adverse drug events secondary to bevacizumab treatment in patients with advanced or metastatic breast cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

The Association between the JAK-STAT Pathway and Hypertension among Kenyan Women Diagnosed with Breast Cancer

Background

Breast cancer is the most common malignant tumor in women worldwide, and disproportionately affects Sub-Saharan Africa compared to high income countries. The global disease burden is growing, with Sub-Saharan Africa reporting majority of the cases. In Kenya, breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer, with an annual incidence of 7,243 new cases in 2022, representing 25.5% of all reported cancers in women. Evidence suggests that women receiving breast cancer treatment are at a greater risk of developing hypertension than women without breast cancer. Hypertension prevalence has been on the rise in SSA, with poor detection, treatment and control. The JAK-STAT signaling is activated in hormone receptor-positive breast tumors, leading to inflammation, cell proliferation, and treatment resistance in cancer cells. We sought to understand the association between the expression of JAK-STAT Pathway genes and hypertension among Kenyan women diagnosed with breast cancer.

Methods

Breast tumor and non-tumor tissues were acquired from patients with a pathologic diagnosis of invasive breast carcinoma. RNA was extracted from fresh frozen tumor and adjacent normal tissue samples of 23 participants who had at least 50% tumor after pathological examination, as well as their corresponding adjacent normal samples. Differentially expressed JAK-STAT genes between tumor and normal breast tissues were assessed using the DESEq2 R package. Pearson correlation was used to assess the correlation between differentially expressed JAK-STAT genes and participants' blood pressure, heart rate, and body mass index (BMI).

Results

11,868 genes were differentially expressed between breast tumor and non-tumor tissues. Eight JAK-STAT genes were significantly dysregulated (Log2FC ≥ 1.0 and an Padj ≤ 0.05), with two genes (CISH and SCNN1A) being upregulated. Six genes (TGFBR2, STAT5A, STAT5B, TGFRB3, SMAD9, and SOCS2) were downregulated. We identified STAT5A and SOCS2 genes to be significantly correlated with elevated systolic pressure and heart rate, respectively.

Conclusions

Our study provides insights underlying the molecular mechanisms of hypertension among Kenyan women diagnosed with breast cancer. Understanding these mechanisms may help develop targeted treatments that may improve health outcomes of Kenyan women diagnosed with breast cancer. Longitudinal studies with larger cohorts will be needed to validate our results.

Front-Line Bevacizumab plus Chemotherapy with or without Maintenance Therapy for Metastatic Breast Cancer: An Observational Study by the Hellenic Oncology Research Group

Front-line bevacizumab (BEV) in combination with taxanes offers benefit in progression-free survival (PFS) in metastatic breast cancer (mBC). The medical records of mBC patients, treated with front-line BEV-based chemotherapy, were retrospectively reviewed in order to generate real life safety and efficacy data. Patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative mBC treated with front-line BEV in combination with chemotherapy were eligible. Maintenance therapy with BEV and/or hormonal agents was at the physicians’ discretion. Among the 387 included patients, the most common adverse events were anemia (61.9%, mainly grade 1), grade 3/4 neutropenia (16.5%), grade 1/2 fatigue (22.3%), and grade 1/2 neuropathy (19.6%). Dose reductions were required in 164 cycles (7.1%) and toxicity led to treatment discontinuation in 21 patients (5.4%). The median PFS and the median overall survival (OS) were 13.3 (95% CI: 11.7–14.8) and 32.3 months (95% CI: 27.7–36.9), respectively. Maintenance therapy, with hormonal agents (ET) and/or BEV, was associated with longer OS versus no maintenance therapy (47.2 versus 23.6 months; p < 0.001) in patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive disease and BEV maintenance offered longer OS versus no maintenance in patients with HR-negative disease (52.8 versus 23.3; p = 0.023). These real-life data show that front-line BEV-based chemotherapy in HER2-negative mBC patients is an effective treatment with an acceptable toxicity profile. The potential benefit of maintenance treatment, especially ET, is important and warrants further research.

Clinical Benefits of Oral Anticoagulant Use in Cancer Patients at Increased Risk for Venous Thromboembolism per Khorana Index

Background

Cancer patients are at increased risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE) due to cancer-induced hypercoagulability. However, current guidelines do not routinely recommend prophylactic use of oral anticoagulants to prevent VTE in cancer patients.

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) versus no anticoagulant use (no-use) and, additionally, differential effects between NOACs and warfarin, in VTE and adverse bleeding prevention among cancer patients, in consideration of risk stratification by gender, high-risk chemotherapy exposure, and Khorana index.

Methods

This national health insurance data-based study with a 180-day follow-up enrolled cancer patients with or without oral anticoagulant use in 2017. The primary outcome was VTE risk in oral anticoagulant users vs non-users. Four propensity score-matched comparison pairs were designed: use vs no-use, NOAC vs no-use, warfarin vs no-use, and NOAC vs warfarin. A logistic regression model was used to investigate between-group differences in VTE and bleeding risk.

Results

When compared to no-use, NOACs showed substantial effects in preventing VTE complications (OR=0.40, p<0.001), primarily deep vein thrombosis (DVT) events (OR=0.38, p<0.001), in both male and female cancer patients as well as those with a Khorana score ≥1. Adverse bleeding risk was comparable or lower in NOAC-receiving female patients (p=0.13) and male patients (p=0.04), respectively. In contrast, no protective effects were found with warfarin compared to no-use in controlling thrombosis and adverse bleeding risk. In a head-to-head comparison of NOACs versus warfarin, DVT risk in those patients exposed to high-risk chemotherapy was significantly decreased with NOAC use (OR=0.19, p=0.03).

Conclusion

NOACs can be a promising thromboprophylactic option in both male and female cancer patients with VTE risk.

Meta-analysis on the risk of fatal adverse events by bevacizumab, cetuximab, and panitumumab in 31 randomized trials including 25,000 patients with colorectal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Targeted drugs including bevacizumab, cetuximab, and panitumumab have been widely used during the management of patients diagnosed with colorectal carcinoma, especially as palliative treatment. The present meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the fatal adverse events (FAEs) of targeted drugs including bevacizumab, cetuximab, and panitumumab in patients with colorectal cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Studies of prospective, randomized, and controlled feature from EMBASE, Medline, and Cochrane Library, which reported FAEs potentially associated with bevacizumab, cetuximab, and panitumumab were adopted. Clinical characteristics and FAEs were collected from the enrolled literatures, with the quality of which been evaluated. Pooled analysis of FAEs, caused by each agent as first line, second/further line, and adjuvant treatment were performed with relative risks (RRs) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) in software RevMan 5.3.

RESULTS

Thirty-one studies including 25,939 patients were brought into the final analysis. The RR and its 95% CI of the FAEs among all the agents including bevacizumab, cetuximab, and panitumumab was 1.07 (95% CI, 0.89-1.29; P = .50). The RRs and their 95% CIs of the FAEs as first line, second or further line, and adjuvant treatment related to bevacizumab were 0.91 (95% CI, 0.62-1.32; P = .61), 1.14 (95% CI, 0.57-2.28; P = .71), and 1.10 (95% CI, 0.67-1.79; P = .72). The RRs and their 95% CIs of the FAEs as first line, second or further line, and adjuvant treatment related to cetuximab were 1.02 (95% CI, 0.60-1.76; P = .93), 2.51 (95% CI, 0.49-12.88; P = .27), and 2.40 (95% CI, 1.00-5.77; P = .05). The RRs and their 95% CIs of the FAEs as first line, second or further line treatment related to panitumumab were 1.40 (95% CI, 0.89-2.18; P = .14) and 0.68 (95% CI, 0.43-1.09; P = .11), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The present meta-analysis did not show any significantly increased RR of FAEs belonging to bevacizumab, cetuximab, or panitumumab, whether as first line, second/further line, or adjuvant treatment among patients with colorectal carcinoma comparing to placebo or blank treatment.

A Meta-Analysis of Cardiovascular Events Associated with Intravitreal Anti-VEGF Treatment in Patients with Retinal Vein Occlusion

Purpose: Retinal vein occlusion is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular diseases. Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor has been widely used as a treatment option. However, the systemic safety of intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor for retinal vein occlusion patients is still unclear.Materials and Methods: A meta-analysis was conducted to investigate all randomized controlled trials published up to February 2019 of retinal vein occlusion patients who received intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor vs. control treatments. Fixed effect models were used and results were reported as odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals.Results: Eight trials that evaluated 2320 patients were retrieved. Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor did not significantly increase the risks of cardiovascular events (odds ratio,1.54; 95% confidence interval, 0.66-3.57), hypertension (odds ratio, 0.92; 95% confidence interval, 0.63-1.33), or heart rate disorders (odds ratio,1.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.37-6.28) when compared with control treatment. Subgroup analyses did not show a significant increase of cardiovascular events in aflibercept (odds ratio,1.96; 95% confidence interval, 0.44-8.81) vs. ranibizumab trials (odds ratio, 1.47; 95% confidence interval, 0.54-4.02); 0.5 mg ranibizumab trials (odds ratio, 1.73; 95% confidence interval, 0.61-4.96) vs. 0.3 mg ranibizumab trials (odds ratio, 0.70; 95% confidence interval, 0.14-3.59); nor branch retinal vein occlusion (odds ratio, 1.32; 95% confidence interval, 0.40-4.33) vs. central retinal vein occlusion trials (odds ratio, 1.93; 95% confidence interval, 0.59-6.29).Conclusions: Intravitreal administration of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor did not significantly increase the risks of cardiovascular events, hypertension or heart rate disorders in retinal vein occlusion patients.

18F-labeled magnetic nanoparticles for monitoring anti-angiogenic therapeutic effects in breast cancer xenografts

PURPOSE

To develop a novel fluorine-18 (¹⁸F)-labeled arginine-glycine-aspartic acid (RGD)-coupled ultra-small iron oxide nanoparticle (USPIO) (hereafter, referred to as ¹⁸F-RGD@USPIO) and conduct an in-depth investigation to monitor the anti-angiogenic therapeutic effects by using a novel dual-modality PET/MRI probe.

METHODS

The RGD peptide and ¹⁸F were coupled onto USPIO by click chemistry. In vitro experiments including determination of stability, cytotoxicity, cell binding of the obtained ¹⁸F-RGD@USPIO were carried out, and the targeting kinetics and bio-distribution were tested on an MDA-MB-231 tumor model. A total of 20 (n = 10 per group) MDA-MB-231 xenograft-bearing mice were treated with bevacizumab or placebo (intraperitoneal injections of bevacizumab or a volume-equivalent placebo solution at the dose of 5 mg/kg for consecutive 7 days, respectively), and underwent PET/CT and MRI examinations with ¹⁸F-RGD@USPIO before and after treatment. Imaging findings were validated by histological analysis with regard to β₃-integrin expression (CD61 expression), microvascular density (CD31 expression), and proliferation (Ki-67 expression).

RESULTS

Excellent stability, low toxicity, and good specificity to endothelial of ¹⁸F-RGD@USPIO were confirmed. The best time point for MRI scan was 6 h post-injection. No intergroup differences were observed in tumor volume development between baseline and day 7. However, ¹⁸F-RGD@USPIO binding was significantly reduced after bevacizumab treatment compared with placebo, both on MRI (P < 0.001) and PET/CT (P = 0.002). Significantly lower microvascular density, tumor cell proliferation, and integrin β₃ expression were noted in the bevacizumab therapy group than the placebo group, which were consistent with the imaging results.

CONCLUSION

PET/MRI with the dual-modality nanoprobe, ¹⁸F-RGD@USPIO, can be implemented as a noninvasive approach to monitor the therapeutic effects of anti-angiogenesis in breast cancer model in vivo.