Symptomatic flexible flatfoot in adults: subtalar arthroereisis

Clinical outcomes of subtalar arthroereisis for the treatment of stage 1 flexible progressive collapsing foot deformity

BACKGROUND

The use of subtalar arthroereisis as an adjunct to the surgical treatment of stage 1 flexible progressive collapsing foot deformity (PCFD) is controversial. The aim was to investigate the clinical outcomes and report the implant removal rate of subtalar arthroereisis as an adjunct for stage 1 PCFD.

METHODS

A retrospective study of 212 consecutive feet undergoing operative management of stage 1 PCFD with adjunctive subtalar arthroereisis between October 2010 and April 2018. The primary outcome was the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS). Secondary outcomes included Foot and Ankle Disability Index (FADI), Euroqol-5D-5L Index and implant removal rate.

RESULTS

Post-operative clinical FAOS outcomes were collected for 153 feet (72.2%). At mean 2.5-year follow-up, the mean ± standard deviation FAOS for each domain was as follows; Pain: 81.5 ± 18.5, Symptoms: 79.5 ± 12.9, Activities of Daily Living: 82.5 ± 15.4 and Quality of Life: 64.2 ± 23.7. EQ-5D-5L Index was 0.884 ± 0.152. Pre-operative scores were available for 20 of these feet demonstrating a statistically significant improvement in all FAOS, FADI and EQ-5D-5L domains (p < 0.05). The implant removal rate for persistent sinus tarsi pain was 48.1% (n = 102).

CONCLUSION

Use of a subtalar arthroereisis implant as an adjunct to conventional procedures in stage 1 flexible PCFD can result in significant improvement in pain and function. Patients should be counselled as to the relatively frequent rate of subsequent implant removal.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Comparative study between medial displacement calcaneal osteotomy using modified step plate and arthroereisis for management of planovalgus feet

Background: Flexible flatfoot is a common condition that is characterized by hindfoot valgus with longitudinal medial-arch collapse. Many strategies for treatment have been reported but according to the current literature, controversy remains. Objectives: To compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of medializing calcaneal osteotomy utilizing modified step plate and subtalar arthroereisis utilizing conical subtalar implant for patients with symptomatic flexible pes planus. Methods: A prospective, randomized, double center study was conducted between May 2017 and May 2019 at the Foot and Ankle Department of Cairo University Hospital and El Sahel Teaching Hospital on 26 patients (37 feet) with flexible flat feet to compare between medial displacement calcaneal osteotomy using modified locked step plate (group A) compromising 17 feet and arthroereisis using subtalar implant (group B) compromising 20 feet. Results: By the end period of the study, 25 males and 12 females were available for our analysis of results with a mean follow-up period of 10.14 months (range 7–14 months), clinical scoring (American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score, Foot Functional Index) with radiological analysis revealed a non-significant difference between both groups, the overall complication rate was 16.2%. Conclusion: Both medial displacement calcaneal osteotomy and subtalar arthroereisis significantly improved radiographic and subjective clinical outcome measures in the surgical treatment of painful flexible planovalgus feet. The less-invasive nature and lower potential morbidity suggest that judicious use of arthroereisis implants is an appropriate alternative.

Satisfactory outcomes of post-operative subtalar extra-articular arthroereisis in juvenile flexible flat foot

OBJECTIVES

To analyze the surgical outcomes of subtalar extra-articular arthroereisis and the patient/parent satisfaction regarding the foot's shape, foot pain, ability to walk, ability to jump, and shoe wear.

METHODS

Our retrospective cross-sectional study was carried out through an online-based questionnaire to assess patient satisfaction postoperatively at 3 hospitals (King Khalid University Hospital, Sultan bin Abdulaziz Humanitarian City, and Dallah Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia) between the years 2014-2021.

RESULTS

A total of 65 patients participated in our study. Approximately 86.1% of them had the operation bilaterally. The most important aspects where patients noticed the most improvement were the foot's shape (90.8%), pain (81.5%), and ability to walk (76.9%).

CONCLUSION

Several studies have been carried out highlighting the surgical technique and complications of the procedure. However, a limited number of studies have been carried out to assess patient satisfaction with the procedure, especially in Saudi Arabia, as the procedure is considered relatively new in the region with insufficient data regarding it. Therefore, this study is considered one of the few articles regarding subtalar extra-articular arthroereisis in the region.

Presurgical Perspective and Postsurgical Evaluation of Non-Achilles Tendons of the Ankle and Retinaculum

The vast majority of non-Achilles ankle tendinopathies are related to overuse. This article discusses the clinical aspect, imaging appearance, and management of tendinopathies of the lateral, medial, and the anterior compartments with a focus on presurgical perspective and postsurgical evaluation.

Outcomes Following the Use of Subtalar Arthroereisis in the Correction of Adult Acquired Flatfoot: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Adult acquired flatfoot deformity (AAFD) is a condition affecting approximately 3% of the adult population. It can lead to severe morbidity, and therefore, prompt treatment is of the upmost importance in maintaining and restoring function. Recently, the use of subtalar arthroereisis has become more widespread in the treatment of AAFD. The purpose of this systematic review is to examine the clinical and radiological outcomes of AAFD when treated with subtalar arthroereisis.

METHODS

Studies involving the use of subtalar arthroereisis for the management of AAFD were reviewed, and appropriate studies selected based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Studies were reviewed for both clinical and radiological outcomes following the use of subtalar arthroereisis as well as reported complications.

RESULTS

Nine studies met our inclusion criteria, with most of these involving stage II AAFD. A total of 190 subtalar arthroereisis procedures were performed with all studies demonstrating improvement in both clinical and radiological scores with a low rate of complications.

CONCLUSION

Subtalar arthroereisis may have benefits when used as an adjunct to treat stage II AAFD. However, more high-quality studies are needed to establish its best use.

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE

Level IV: Systematic review.

Patient Outcomes Following Extra-Osseous Talo-Tarsal Stabilization for Foot Hyperpronation

The aim is to present a single-center case series of patients with symptomatic hyperpronated feet treated with arthroereisis by using a second generation extra-osseous talo-tarsal stabilization device. This case series enrolled 123 feet in 87 patients (20 [6-75] years) treated with arthroereisis, either isolated (76 cases) or combined procedure (47 cases). At their final follow-up, a patient reported questionnaire (overall satisfaction, foot stability and shape, activities of daily living, pain level, and analgesics usage) was distributed. The average postoperative follow-up period was 30 (13-55) months. Nineteen (15%) cases required at least one revision surgery: the implant was manipulated in 5 (4%), while 14 cases (11%) required definitive implant removal. The predominant reason for implant removal was pain (50%), followed by implant migration (27%). The pediatric population with isolated procedure showed lowest revision rate (5%), while adults with combined ankle/hindfoot procedures demonstrated revision rate of 50%. The overall patient satisfaction after arthroereisis was 84%. The patients' perceived improvement in foot stability was 75%, foot shape 85%, and activities of daily living 64%. Eighty-two percent of cases reported no analgesics usage in the last month and mean visual analogue scale (0-10) pain level decreased from 5.5 to 2.2 (p < .001). The subgroup analyses of patient-reported questionnaires revealed the best outcome in the pediatric-isolated cases, while adults with combined procedures reported the lowermost outcome. Extra-osseous talo-tarsal stabilization demonstrated a low rate of revisions surgery and a high satisfaction rate as an isolated procedure. Patients with conjoined procedures experienced more revisions and considerably lower satisfaction rates.

Is subtalar arthroereisis a good procedure in adult-acquired flatfoot? A systematic review of the literature

INTRODUCTION

The aim of the present systematic literature review was to determine results and complications in subtalar arthroereisis for stage-2 adult-acquired flatfoot.

METHOD

A search of the PubMed, Medline, CINAHL, Cochrane and Embase databases used MeSH terms "arthroereisis" AND "flatfoot" OR "adult-acquired flatfoot" OR "pes planovalgus" OR "pes planus". Two of the authors analyzed 125 articles. After reading titles and Abstracts, 105 articles were read in full text and their references were analyzed. Finally, 12 articles were selected and divided into 2 groups: isolated and associated arthroereisis.

RESULTS

Improvement in functional scores was greater in associated arthroereisis. Whether isolated or associated, arthroereisis achieved radiologic correction. However, the rate of complications was high, mainly concerning tarsal sinus pain.

CONCLUSION

Subtalar arthroereisis for stage-2 adult-acquired flatfoot is rarely performed in isolation. When it is associated to other procedures, good radiologic and clinical results can be expected.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Flexible Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity: Is There Any Role for Arthroereisis in the Adult Patient?

Over the last two decades there is a growing interest in the adult literature for subtalar joint arthroereisis. Parallel to this interest, there have been improvements in the design and biomechanics of the implant, although the main indication of subtalar joint arthroereisis in adults is not clear. Most studies show significant improvement in postoperative clinical scores and visual analog scores. Sinus tarsi pain, being the most common complication, is the main determinant of clinical satisfaction. This review focuses on the role and complications of subtalar joint arthroereisis in the adult population.

Comparison between Malerba osteotomy and combined Evans/medial displacement calcaneal osteotomies for the management of flexible pes planus in young adults: a prospective randomised control trial, three years follow-up

PURPOSE

The aim of the current study is to evaluate the functional and radiological outcomes of Malerba osteotomy in comparison to the standardized combined Evans/Medial Displacement Calcaneal Osteotomy (MDCO) in the management of symptomatic flexible pes planus in young adults.

METHODS

Prospective randomized control trial included 34 feet (33 patients), 17 cases in each group. Functionally, patients were assessed by AOFAS and FADI scores. Radiographic evaluation included calcaneal pitch, lateral talo-1st metatarsal, AP talo-first metatarsal, AP talo-calcaneal angles, and the talar coverage percentage.

RESULTS

Pre-operative and three years follow-up scores and angles were compared between both groups. No statistically significant difference could be detected between both groups (P value 0.87). However, the data showed statistically significant difference in each group when comparing (pre-operative and third year follow-up scores and angles) (P value < 0.001). The mean union rate was eight weeks in Malerba group and nine weeks in Evans/MDCO group. No incidence of nonunion. Complications like calcaneocuboid subluxation, calcaneal anterior process fracture, and lateral column pain were exclusively reported in Evans/MDCO group.

CONCLUSION

Malerba osteotomy is a strong valid option for the operative management of flexible pes planus in young adults. Authors recommend Malerba osteotomy in all mild and moderate deformities due to lower complication rate while the combined Evans/MDCO is preferred in severe deformity due to relatively higher corrective power with consideration of possible complications.

Immediate effect of prefabricated and UCBL foot orthoses on alignment of midfoot and forefoot in young people with symptomatic flexible flatfoot: A radiographic evaluation

BACKGROUND

Radiographic imaging has been considered the gold standard in evaluating the skeletal alignment of the foot in static weightbearing. The effects of foot orthoses on the alignment of foot bones have been mostly evaluated using lateral view x-rays. The posterior-anterior view has not been investigated extensively.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the effects of 2 foot orthoses: University of California Biomechanics Laboratory Orthosis (UCBL) and a prefabricated orthosis (P-FFO) on the alignment of foot bones on anterior-posterior x-rays in young people with symptomatic flexible flatfoot (SFF).

STUDY DESIGN

This is a randomized, crossover study.

METHODS

Fifteen participants (mean [SD], 23.67 ± 2 years) with SFF were randomly imaged in 3 different conditions: shoes only, shoes + P-FFO, and shoes + UCBL. The talonavicular coverage, the first and the second talometatarsal angles, the intermetatarsal angle, and the cuboid abduction angle (CAA) were measured on weightbearing, anterior-posterior x-ray images for each condition.

RESULTS

Both orthotic designs demonstrated a significant reduction in the talonavicular coverage, the first and the second talometatarsal angles, and the CAA compared with the shoe-only condition (P < .001). The talonavicular coverage angle reduced by ∼11% using P-FFO compared with UCBL (P < .005). No significant differences were observed for other angles between the 2 orthotic conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

Both orthotic conditions improved the talonavicular coverage, first and the second talometatarsal angle, and CAA in young people with SFF. The walls of the UCBL orthosis did not result in further correction of the talonavicular coverage angle compared with the prefabricated FFO design.

Subtalar Arthroereisis Implantation in Acquired Neuropathic Pes Planus: A Preliminary Report Detailing a Minimally Invasive Approach to Healing Medial Column Ulcerations

Ulcerations under the medial column in patients with acquired neuropathic pes planus may be intractable to conservative techniques such as regular debridement, offloading, bracing, and accommodative shoes. When surgery becomes necessary for these patients, the foot and ankle surgeon has the option of exostectomy, medial column beaming, medial column fusion, and external fixation, among others. In the case of a flexible midfoot collapse, the option of arthroereisis for indirect medial column support may be warranted. In this preliminary report, the authors detail a technique of Achilles tendon lengthening, arthroereisis implantation, and advanced cellular tissue product application in an attempt at wound coverage and prevention of recurrence. Three patients presenting with intractable medial column ulcerations of ∼1 year's duration underwent this procedure, and within 7 weeks (range 5 to 7), all medial column ulcerations healed. These patients remained healed at last follow-up (average 29 months; range 8 to 44). This preliminary report provides evidence for a minimally invasive procedure aimed at offloading, healing, and preventing recurrence of medial column ulcerations in patients with flexible neuropathic pes planus.

Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Subtalar Kalix II Arthroereisis for a Symptomatic Pediatric Flexible Flatfoot

Background. The purpose of this study is to evaluate functional and radiological outcomes of subtalar arthroereisis in the treatment of symptomatic pediatric flexible flatfeet. Methods. A total of 16 patients (26 feet) were treated with a Kalix II as subtalar motion blocker between 2009 and 2014. Calcaneal pitch (CP) and Meary's angle (MA) were measured on radiographs preoperatively, directly postoperatively, and at follow-up 47 ± 17 (range 19-79) months. Patient satisfaction surveys were used to assess functional outcome and patient satisfaction. Results. Surgery was performed mostly for pain, walking problems, or a combination of both at a mean age of 12.5 ± 1.5 (range 10-15) years. Symptoms were relieved in 62.5% of patients in the postoperative phase and increased to 68.75% at follow-up. A statistically significant increase in CP of 2.8° and decrease in MA of 14.0° was observed directly postoperatively, which persisted during the follow-up period irrespective of Kalix removal. Revision surgery was necessary in 6 cases (23%) because of arthroereisis migration. Conclusion. Subtalar Kalix II arthroereisis significantly reduced clinical symptoms and improved the CP and MA directly postoperatively, which persisted during follow-up, irrespective of Kalix removal. Therefore, subtalar arthroereisis is a considerable intervention to reduce symptoms in children with symptomatic flexible flatfeet.Levels of Evidence: Level IV: Case series.

Is subtalar extra articular screw arthroereisis (SESA) reducing pain and restoring medial longitudinal arch in children with flexible flat foot?

Subtalar arthroereisis has been accounted for as a minimally invasive, successful and generally safe technique in the treatment of flatfoot in children. The primary aim of our study was to evaluate the subtalar extra-articular screw arthroereisis (SESA) in children with flexible flatfoot clinically and radiologically. This prospective case series study included 84 feet of 42 patients who underwent Subtalar Extra-articular Screw Arthroereisis (SESA) due to symptomatic flexible flatfoot. This study included 26 males (62 ℅) and 16 females (38℅). The mean age at surgery was (9.92 years); range from (7-15 years).The average follow up period was 29.1 months (ranged from 2 to 48 months). The values of the pre- and post-SESA weight bearing X-ray angles were 149 ± 6 and 127° ± 8° respectively for the Costa-Bartani angle, 43° ± 8° and 25° ± 6° respectively for the lateral T-1stMT angle and 26° ± 7° and 8° ± 3° respectively for calcaneal pitch angle 6° ± 4° and 15° ± 5°. The average AOFAS preoperative score was 68.7 ± 5.7 (Range, 58 to 78) whereas post operative AOFAS score was 97.4 ± 2.3 (range, 94 to 100). All data were analyzed statistically with graph instat. With final conclusion that SESA is an optimal technique for the correction of flexible flatfoot (FFF) as it is simple and can be performed rapidly and is effective procedure in reducing pain and restoring medial longitudinal arch in children with flexible flat foot. Level of clinical evidence (LOCE): Level 4.

Core muscles' endurance in flexible flatfeet: A cross - sectional study

OBJECTIVE

Flexible flatfoot is a common deformity in adults that has been thought to be a causative factor of a lot of lower limb injuries and back pain. Core muscles act as stabilizers for the trunk and weak core places a person at greater risk of low back pain and lower limb injuries. We aimed to compare the core muscles' endurance between individuals with and without flatfeet.

METHODS

Thirty subjects with bilateral flexible flatfeet (study group) were compared with thirty healthy subjects (control group). Navicular drop test was used to evaluate the medial longitudinal arch. Modified back extensors, modified flexion and lateral muscles' endurance tests were used to evaluate the endurance of the core muscles.

RESULTS

The lateral muscles' endurance time in the flatfeet group was found to be significantly lower than that of the healthy group on both sides (p=0.0001). However, no significant difference was found in the trunk flexors' (p=0.15) and trunk extensors' (p=0.27) endurance time between both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Impairment of the lateral core muscles' endurance was observed in subjects with bilateral flexible flatfeet which may predispose to low back pain and other lower limb injuries in those subjects.

Hindfoot alignment of adult acquired flatfoot deformity: A comparison of clinical assessment and weightbearing cone beam CT examinations

BACKGROUND

Clinical assessment of hindfoot alignment (HA) in adult acquired flatfoot deformity (AAFD) can be challenging and weightbearing (WB) cone beam CT (CBCT) may potentially better demonstrate this three-dimensional (3D) deformity. Therefore, we compared clinical and WB CBCT assessment of HA in patients with AAFD.

METHODS

In this prospective study, we included 12 men and 8 women (mean age: 52.2, range: 20-88) with flexible AAFD. All subjects also underwent WB CBCT and clinical assessment of hindfoot alignment. Three fellowship-trained foot and ankle surgeons performed six hindfoot alignment measurements on the CT images. Intra- and Inter-observer reliabilities were calculated using intra-class correlation (ICC). Measurements were compared by paired T-tests, and p-values of less than 0.05 were considered significant.

RESULTS

The mean of clinically measured hindfoot valgus was 15.2 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 11.5-18.8) degrees. It was significantly different from the mean values of all WB CBCT measurements: Clinical Hindfoot Alignment Angle, 9.9 (CI: 8.9-11.1) degrees; Achilles tendon/Calcaneal Tuberosity Angle, 3.2 (CI: 1.3-5.0) degrees; Tibial axis/Calcaneal Tuberosity Angle, 6.1 (CI: 4.3-7.8) degrees; Tibial axis/Subtalar Joint Angle 7.0 (CI: 5.3-8.8) degrees, and Hindfoot Alignment Angle 22.8 (CI: 20.4-25.3) degrees. We found overall substantial to almost perfect intra- (ICC range: 0.87-0.97) and inter-observer agreements (ICC range: 0.51-0.88) for all WB CBCT measurements.

CONCLUSIONS

Using 3D WB CBCT can help characterize the valgus hindfoot alignment in patients with AAFD. We found the different CT measurements to be reliable and repeatable, and to significantly differ from the clinical evaluation of hindfoot valgus alignment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II-prospective comparative study.

Arthroereisis for Symptomatic Flexible Flatfoot Deformity in Young Children: Radiological Assessment and Short-Term Follow-Up

The purpose of this study is to recognize those young patients with symptomatic flexible flatfoot deformity who need treatment and to provide radiological evidence that arthroereisis is capable of relocating the talus properly over the calcaneus. We included 28 feet in 14 children who underwent subtalar arthroereisis in association with percutaneous triple-hemisection Achilles tendon lengthening. Selected for arthroereisis were children with symptomatic flexible flatfoot deformity who complained of foot and leg pain, had decreased endurance in sports activities and long walks, who did not respond to conservative treatment modalities for at least 6 months, and in whom at radiological assessment on stance position with the medial arch support orthosis the talonavicular joint lateral subluxation still remained, with Meary's angle in anteroposterior (A/P) and lateral view remaining increased. The mean age at surgery was 10.71 ± 1.58 (range 8 to 14) years. The minimum follow-up duration was 19 months, with mean follow-up duration of 35.14 ± 9.82 (range 19 to 60) months. For estimation of the efficacy of the surgical procedure, the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AFOAS) rating scale was used preoperatively and postoperatively in all patients. The mean preoperative AFOAS ankle-hind foot rating score was 65.14 ± 7.16 (range 58 to 75) points. The mean postoperative AFOAS score was 88.851 ± 5.61 (range 83 to 97) points and the 2-tailed p value <.0001. After arthroereisis surgical treatment, all AOFAS scores and all foot angles improved significantly, except the calcaneal inclination angle which improved slightly.

Body Weight Effects on Extra-Osseous Subtalar Arthroereisis

Implant extrusion in subtalar arthroereisis is a common complication for pediatric flexible flatfoot. However, there were a limited number of articles addressing the body weight effects on implant extrusion after the procedure. We conducted a 24-month follow-up assessment after subtalar arthroereisis. Surgical patients who underwent the Vulpius procedure were retrospectively collected from May 2010 to January 2017, including 59 cases of both feet having implants in situ and 43 cases of both feet having implant extrusion. The average age of 102 patients was 9 years old. The mean body mass index (BMI) of the implant in situ group was 19.5, whilst the extrusion group was 21.2 (p = 0.035). The inter-observer correlation was excellent. There were 11 cases (39.3%) of bilateral extrusion in the overweight group (BMI ≥ 24) and 13 cases (23.2%) in the low body weight group (BMI ≤ 18.5) (p < 0.0004). Postoperative radiographic angles were corrected in both the implant in situ group and the extrusion group. Nonetheless, the implant in situ group revealed better postoperative outcomes of Meary’s angle and the talonavicular angle from an anterior-posterior view, and the talar inclination angle from a lateral view. We conclude that a higher BMI is related to implant extrusion and worse results after subtalar arthroereisis. Further prospective study to investigate whether preoperative weight loss results in improved surgical outcomes is warranted in the future.

Adult-Acquired Flatfoot Deformity

Adult-acquired flatfoot deformity (AAFD) comprises a wide spectrum of ligament and tendon failure that may result in significant deformity and disability. It is often associated with posterior tibial tendon deficiency (PTTD), which has been linked to multiple demographic factors, medical comorbidities, and genetic processes. AAFD is classified using stages I through IV. Nonoperative treatment modalities should always be attempted first and often provide resolution in stages I and II. Stage II, consisting of a wide range of flexible deformities, is typically treated operatively with a combination of soft tissue procedures and osteotomies. Stage III, which is characterized by a rigid flatfoot, typically warrants triple arthrodesis. Stage IV, where the flatfoot deformity involves the ankle joint, is treated with ankle arthrodesis or ankle arthroplasty with or without deltoid ligament reconstruction along with procedures to restore alignment of the foot. There is limited evidence as to the optimal procedure; thus, the surgical indications and techniques continue to be researched.

The arthroereisis procedure in adult flexible flatfoot grade IIA due to insufficiency of posterior tibial tendon

BACKGROUND

To report on the functional, biomechanical, and radiographic results of patients who had undergone arthroereisis plus tensioning of the posterior tibial tendon for flexible flatfoot. The hypothesis is that arthroereisis associated to a tensioning of the posterior tibial tendon give a good correction with great satisfaction in patients with flexible flatfoot in grade IIA.

METHODS

We evaluated 29 patients (31 feet), mean age of 46.4 years, who had been surgically treated for adult flatfoot grade IIA according to Myerson. Mean follow-up was 34.15 months. For clinical evaluation, the AOFAS hindfoot and VAS-FA scores were used.

RESULTS

Postoperative results showed significant increases in both AOFAS and VAS-FA scores: 54.2-81.9 and 61.5-83.2 points, respectively. For the X-ray parameters, we observed a significant variation in the talo-first metatarsal angle, from 13.8° in pre-op to 7.4° in post-op. In lateral view, Djian Annonier angle was improved from 146.6° to 134.1°. The Meary's angle, compared to an average of 8.8° in pre-operative stage improved to 4.3° in the post-operative stage. Postoperative satisfaction was excellent-good according to 23 patients (79.4%). Pain in the tarsal sinus was reported in 5 out of 31 feet (16.1%) for the first three months after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Arthroereisis and tensioning of the posterior tibial tendon provided good functional outcomes for patients under 60 years of age having stage IIA flexible flatfoot without arthritic manifestations.

Postoperative Imaging of the Ankle

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this article is to review imaging after commonly encountered surgical interventions of the ligaments, tendons, and soft tissues around the ankle. Intraoperative images, when available, are provided to improve conceptual understanding of these complex procedures.

CONCLUSION

Surgical interventions in the ankle are becoming more prevalent with increasing athletic demands and emerging focus on techniques for prevention of joint injury. Knowledge of the surgical techniques, imaging appearances, and complications in the postoperative ankle is necessary for the accurate diagnosis of postoperative complications and for optimal patient care.

Comparison of Extraosseous Talotarsal Stabilization Implants in a Stage II Adult-Acquired Flatfoot Model: A Finite Element Analysis

Subtalar arthroereisis has been proved to be an efficient method for correcting flexible adult flatfoot. However, the optimal sinus tarsi implant is still debated and yet to be determined. In the present study, we compared the biomechanical effects of type I and II sinus tarsi implants in stage II adult-acquired flatfoot deformity (AAFD). First, a finite element model of stage II AAFD was established in which virtual surgery of subtalar arthroereisis was simulated. The indexes of plantar stress distribution, peak von Mises of the medial and lateral columns, strain of the medial ligaments and plantar fascia, arch height, talo-first metatarsal angle, calcaneus pitch angle, talonavicular coverage angle, and hindfoot valgus angle were all compared and analyzed. The results of the present study have validated the stage II AAFD finite element model by comparing the simulation results with the same parameters measured from weightbearing radiographs in the midstance phase. All the indexes showed that both types of arthroereisis can lower the plantar pressure and the strain of the medial ligaments that support the medial longitudinal arch and can shift the load of the medial column to the lateral column. They can also help to correct the deformity and restore the arch. However, the type II sinus tarsi implant design exhibited a more obvious effect than that of type I.

The role of arthroereisis of the subtalar joint for flatfoot in children and adults

Subtalar arthroereisis has been reported as a minimally-invasive, effective and low-risk procedure in the treatment of flatfoot mainly in children but also in adults.It has been described as a standalone or adjunctive procedure, and is indicated in the treatment of flexible flatfoot, tibialis posterior tendon dysfunction, tarsal coalition and accessory navicular syndrome.Different devices for subtalar arthroereisis are currently used throughout the world associated with soft-tissue and bone procedures, depending on the surgeon rather than on standardised or validated protocols.Sinus tarsi pain is the most frequent complication, often requiring removal of the implant.To date, poor-quality evidence is available in the literature (Level IV and V), with only one comparative non-randomised study (Level II) not providing strong recommendations. Long-term outcome and complication rates (especially the onset of osteoarthritis) are still unclear. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2017;2:438-446. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.2.170009.

The Undercorrected Flatfoot Reconstruction

In symptomatic patients, undercorrection of a flatfoot deformity can lead to the need for revision surgery to restore functional mechanics and prevent progression of deformity. The underlying cause of undercorrection is failure to fully recognize or understand the extent of the deformity. This article discusses the typical deformities in adult flatfoot and indications for surgical intervention. Also presented are the surgical procedures for the correction of the typical deformity patterns with available outcome statistics and a stepwise algorithm for patient evaluation to assist in treatment and mitigate the risk of undercorrection of deformity.

Flat Foot in a Random Population and its Impact on Quality of Life and Functionality

INTRODUCTION

Flat foot is a common deformity in adults. It is characterized by medial rotation and plantar flexion of the talus, eversion of the calcaneus, collapsed medial arch and abduction of the forefoot.

AIM

The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of flat foot and its impact on quality of life, dependence, foot pain, disability and functional limitation among random population of 40-year-old and above.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A cross-sectional study in a random population sample from Cambre (A Coruña-Spain) (n=835) was performed (α =0.05; Precision=±3.4%). The diagnosis of flat foot was stablished by the study of the footprint obtained with a pedograph. Anthropometric variables were studied, Charlson's Comorbidity Index, function and state of foot (Foot Function Index (FFI), Foot Health Status Questionnaire (FHSQ)), quality of life (SF-36), and dependence for activities of daily living (Barthel and Lawton index). A logistic and linear multiple regression analysis was performed.

RESULTS

The prevalence of flat foot was 26.62%. Patients with flat foot were significantly older (65.73±11.04 vs 61.03±11.45-year-old), showed a higher comorbidity index (0.92±1.49 vs 0.50±0.98), had a greater BMI (31.45±5.55 vs 28.40±4.17) and greater foot size (25.16±1.66 vs 24.82±1.65). The presence of flat foot diminishes the quality of life, as measured by the FHSQ, and foot function, measured by the FFI. The presence of flat foot does not alter the physical and mental dimension of the SF-36 or the degree of dependence.

CONCLUSION

Flat foot was associated with age, Charlson's Comorbidity Index, BMI and foot size. The SF-36, Barthel and Lawton questionnaires remained unaltered by the presence of flat foot. The FHSQ and FFI questionnaires did prove to be sensitive to the presence of flat foot in a significant manner.

Imaging findings of arthroereisis in planovalgus feet

Arthroereisis is a rare and disputed procedure, where an implant screw is inserted into the sinus tarsi to treat flatfoot deformity. Weight-bearing radiographs are the most essential examinations to assess the correct localization and related measurements. Hardware loosening is the most common complication seen as localized lucency and as dislocation of the implant. Computed tomography yields superior resolution with reconstruction capabilities. On magnetic resonance imaging, the implant appears as a dark signal focus on T1 and T2-weighted images with a hyperintense T2-signal rim. As the data on the imaging of arthroereisis are scarce, we aimed here to review the typical imaging findings.