Critical review of cancer risk associated with angiotensin receptor blocker therapy

Anti-hypertensive medications and risk of colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Antihypertensive medications may impact colorectal cancer risk. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of associations, with colorectal cancer risk, of five classes of antihypertensive medications: angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), beta-blockers (BBs), calcium channel blockers (CCBs), and diuretics.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane library to identify relevant studies evaluating associations of ACEIs, ARBs, BBs, CCBs, and diuretics with colorectal cancer risk. Meta-analytic risk ratios (RRs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated using the inverse variance method.

RESULTS

No overall significant associations with colorectal cancer risk were observed; ACEIs (5 studies) RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.91-1.23, ARBs (5 studies) RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.80-1.11, BBs (4 studies) RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.92-1.08, CCBs (4 studies) RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.88-1.18, and diuretics (6 studies) RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.90-1.17. There was considerable heterogeneity across studies, partly explained by differences in study design and location. When stratified by study location, there was significantly reduced colorectal cancer risk for ARB use in Asian populations (2 studies, RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.58-0.83).

CONCLUSION

No significant colorectal cancer risk with ACEIs, BBs, CCBs, or diuretics was observed. ARB use may be associated with decreased risk of colorectal cancer in Asian populations, although additional studies in diverse populations are needed to confirm associations and help understand possible reasons for geographical differences.

Therapeutic Targeting of Cancer Stem Cells via Modulation of the Renin-Angiotensin System

Cancer stem cells (CSCs) are proposed to be the cells that initiate tumorigenesis and maintain tumor development due to their self-renewal and multipotency properties. CSCs have been identified in many cancer types and are thought to be responsible for treatment resistance, metastasis, and recurrence. As such, targeting CSCs specifically should result in durable cancer treatment. One potential option for targeting CSCs is by manipulation of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) and pathways that converge on the RAS with numerous inexpensive medications currently in common clinical use. In addition to its crucial role in cardiovascular and body fluid homeostasis, the RAS is vital for stem cell maintenance and differentiation and plays a role in tumorigenesis and cancer prevention, suggesting that these roles may converge and result in modulation of CSC function by the RAS. In support of this, components of the RAS have been shown to be expressed in many cancer types and have been more recently localized to the CSCs in some tumors. Given these roles of the RAS in tumor development, clinical trials using RAS inhibitors either singly or in combination with other therapies are underway in different cancer types. This review outlines the roles of the RAS, with respect to CSCs, and suggests that the presence of components of the RAS in CSCs could offer an avenue for therapeutic targeting using RAS modulators. Due to the nature of the RAS and its crosstalk with numerous other signaling pathways, a systems approach using traditional RAS inhibitors in combination with inhibitors of bypass loops of the RAS and other signaling pathways that converge on the RAS may offer a novel therapeutic approach to cancer treatment.

Associations between metabolic disorders and risk of cancer in Danish men and women--a nationwide cohort study

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of metabolic disorders is increasing and has been suggested to increase cancer risk, but the relation between metabolic disorders and risk of cancer is unclear, especially in young adults. We investigated the associations between diabetes, hypertension, and hypercholesterolemia on risk of all-site as well as site-specific cancers.

METHODS

We consecutively included men and women from nationwide Danish registries 1996-2011, if age 20-89 and without cancer prior to date of entry. We followed them throughout 2012. Metabolic disorders were defined using discharge diagnosis codes and claimed prescriptions. We used time-dependent sex-stratified Poisson regression models adjusted for age and calendar year to assess associations between metabolic disorders, and risk of all-site and site-specific cancer (no metabolic disorders as reference).

RESULTS

Over a mean follow-up of 12.6 (± 5.7 standard deviations [SD]) years, 4,826,142 individuals (50.2% women) with a mean age of 41.4 (± 18.9 SD) years had 423,942 incident cancers. Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) of all-site cancer in patients with diabetes or hypertension were highest immediately following diagnosis of metabolic disorder. In women, cancer risk associated with diabetes continued to decline albeit remained significant (IRRs of 1.18-1.22 in years 1-8 following diagnosis). For diabetes in men, and hypertension, IRRs stabilized and remained significantly increased after about one year with IRRs of 1.10-1.13 in men for diabetes, and 1.07-1.14 for hypertension in both sexes. Conversely, no association was observed between hypercholesterolemia (treatment with statins) and cancer risk. The association between hypertension and cancer risk was strongest in young adults aged 20-34 and decreased with advancing age.

CONCLUSIONS

Diabetes and hypertension were associated with increased risk of all-site cancer.

Drug development: how academia, industry and authorities interact

Unfortunately, abundant examples could be given of pitfalls in the current drug development paradigm-including in the design, conduct and evaluation of phase III clinical trials. This article discusses issues of particular relevance to clinical trials in nephrology, including the inappropriate use of placebo, publication of reports that emphasize potential treatment benefits over adverse reactions, the sometimes dubious impartiality of independent guidelines, and inadequate recruitment of elderly patients. This Perspectives article aims to highlight and summarize the flaws in the current drug development process, while suggesting a way forward that equally satisfies the requirements of academia, patients and the pharmaceutical industry. We suggest improvements to the drug development process and related legislation that intend to balance public needs with commercial aims and ensure effective drug evaluation by regulatory authorities.