Spanish translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation of the Questionnaire for Diabetes-Related Foot Disease (Q-DFD)

Thai version of the Questionnaire for Diabetes-Related Foot Disease (Thai Q-DFD): validity and reliability

Aims

To reduce diabetic foot complications, an annual screening of diabetes-related foot disease (DRFD) should be promoted. The screening tool as the Thai translated Questionnaire for Diabetes-related Foot Disease, Thai Q-DFD, has been established. The study was designed to assess the validity and reliability of the Thai Q-DFD before practical use in the community.

Methods

One hundred and thirty-nine persons with diabetes volunteered in a concurrent validity testing for agreement in diagnosis between the Thai Q-DFD and the standard clinical examinations. The test-retest reliability (a stability of a tool over time between three days apart) was assessed in 50 volunteers. The agreement in either validity or reliability test was evaluated using kappa coefficient.

Results

The screening diagnosis as DRFD by the Thai Q-DFD substantially agreed with that by the standard clinical examinations (kappa = 0.71). The Thai Q-DFD also showed high sensitivity (0.92) and specificity (0.78). Additionally, the Thai Q-DFD presented good test-retest reliability for DRFD diagnosis (kappa = 0.74).

Conclusions

The Thai Q-DFD is comparable to the original English version in terms of concurrent validity and test-retest reliability. Therefore, it can be used for a screening of DRFD in Thai people.

Diabetic foot disease: a systematic literature review of patient-reported outcome measures

PURPOSE

Diabetic foot disease is one of the most serious and expensive complications of diabetes. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) analyse patients' perception of their disability, functionality and health. The goal of this work was to conduct a systematic review regarding the specific PROMs related to the evaluation of diabetic foot disease and to extract and analyse the values of their measurement properties.

METHODS

Electronic databases included were PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, PEDro, Cochrane, SciELO and EMBASE. The search terms used were foot, diabet*, diabetic foot, questionnaire, patient-reported outcome, self-care, valid*, reliabil*. Studies whose did not satisfy the Critical Appraisals Skills Programme (CASP) Diagnostic Study Checklist were excluded. The measurement properties extracted were: Internal Consistency, Test-retest, Inter-rater and Intra-rater, Standard Error of Measurement, Minimum Detectable Measurement Difference, Content Validity, Construct Validity, Criterion Validity and Responsiveness.

RESULTS

The PROMs selected for this review were 12 questionnaires. The Diabetic foot self-care questionnaire (DFSQ-UMA) and the Questionnaire for Diabetes Related Foot Disease (Q-DFD) were the PROMs that showed the highest number of completed measurement properties.

CONCLUSION

According to the results, it is relevant to create specific questionnaires for the evaluation of diabetic foot disease. It seems appropriate to use both DFSQ-UMA and Q-DFD when assessing patients with diabetic foot disease.

Quality of Foot Care Among Patients With Diabetes: A Study Using a Polish Version of the Diabetes Foot Disease and Foot Care Questionnaire

Diabetic foot syndrome is a common, yet serious complication of diabetes, affecting 4% to 10% of patients with diabetes. Polish Diabetes Association guidelines emphasize the need for prevention among patients with diabetes; a key role is played by consistent education on foot care and ulceration prevention. The Diabetes Foot Disease and Foot Care Questionnaire (DFDFC-Q) is the only research instrument available for comprehensive assessment of foot self-care. The study purposes were to explore the quality of foot care among patients with diabetes and to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Polish version of the DFDFC-Q in adult patients with diabetes. The study included 180 patients (112 females and 68 males, mean age 62 ± 14.1 years) with clinically confirmed diabetes mellitus and was performed between January 2017 and May 2018. The questionnaire was translated into Polis, and evaluated by using Cronbach's α coefficient. Of the 180 patients, 39.7% demonstrated good quality of self-care, 44.7% demonstrated moderate quality, and 15.6% demonstrated low quality. Mean score in the group was 22 ± 4.18 points. Scale reliability as measured by Cronbach's α was 0.672. One hundred thirteen (62.78%) patients inspected their feet daily. Many patients wore improper footwear: flip-flops (69.44%) or sandals (58.89%). The aspect most commonly omitted in diabetes education was inspection of the soles of one's feet using a mirror (17.7%). We found that 16.1% of patients visited a podologist in the past year. Comparative analysis demonstrated that a good-quality foot self-care was associated with high school education (p = .008), not having a partner (p = .046), and adhering to dietary recommendations (p = .014). In the linear regression model, independent predictors of better foot self-care included high school and vocational education (β = 7.439, p = .001 and β = 5.539, p = .014, respectively), marital status (divorced and single: β = 3.496, p = .025, widowed: β = 3.466, p = .048), professional inactivity (retirees: β = 7.679, p = .001; disability pensioners: β = 3.522, p = .049; unemployed: β = 4.631, p = .017), and adhering to a diet (β = 5.065, p = .001). An independent negative predictor (i.e., one associated with lower scores in the questionnaire) was male sex (β = -2.853, p = .024). The Polish version of the DFDFC-Q has moderate psychometric properties, but because of the lack of other available instruments for foot self-care assessment, it can be used in the population of Polish diabetic patients. Better quality of foot self-care is determined by high school education, marital status (not having a partner), and adhering to dietary treatment recommendations.

Linguistic and Cultural Adaptation to Spanish of the Screening Tool Psoriatic Arthritis UnclutteRed Screening Evaluation (PURE4)

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The 4-item Psoriatic arthritis UnclutteRed screening Evaluation (PURE-4) questionnaire is a useful tool for identifying patients with suspected psoriatic arthritis before referring them to a rheumatology department for confirmation. The original English version has good discriminant validity (sensitivity, 85.7%; specificity, 83.6%). We aimed to produce an adapted Spanish version of the PURE-4 for validation and use in Spain.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

We applied the method recommended by the International Society for Pharmacoeconomic and Outcome Research for the cultural adaptation of patient-centered measurement tools. The phases in the processes involved forward translation, reconciliation, back translation review, harmonization, cognitive debriefing and review, and proofreading.

RESULTS

We obtained the permission of the author of the original questionnaire. Two native-speaking translators translated the questionnaire into Spanish. Small changes, mainly in the way the items were expressed, were then made in order to reconcile the 2 translations. The questionnaire was then back translated to English and revised to achieve a version equivalent to the original. A Spanish translation derived from the revision was tested for understandability in 7 patients, and the final Spanish version was then produced. During the translation phases, the project manager and a scientific committee made up of a dermatologist and a rheumatologist reviewed the different versions. Team members exchanged information throughout the process, providing for harmonization and the quality control that guaranteed conceptual equivalence.

CONCLUSIONS

This adaptation of the PURE-4 questionnaire for use in Spain has been the first step toward using it in routine clinical practice. The standardized method we used ensures that the Spanish and the original versions are equivalent.

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Patients with Diabetes Mellitus Associated with Foot and Ankle Pathologies: A Systematic Review

Background: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a chronic and complex disease, which is a major cause of morbidity and mortality and affects all age groups. It commonly produces secondary effects on the foot, often making daily activities impossible. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) provide a standardised method of obtaining patients’ outlooks on their functional status and wellbeing. Although many instruments have been proposed for obtaining data on persons with DM whose feet are affected by the disease, in many cases the psychometric properties of the instrument have yet to be established. The principal objective of our review was to identify PROMs specific for patients with DM affecting the foot and ankle and to evaluate the psychometric properties and methodological quality of these instruments. Methods: In this systematic review, we investigate studies (published in English or Spanish) based on the use of one or more PROMs specific to foot and ankle pathologies for patients with DM (type I or II). To do so, the databases PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, PEDro and Google Scholar were searched for studies that analysed psychometric or clinimetric properties in this respect. These were assessed according to Terwee or COSMIN criteria. Results: Of the 1016 studies identified in the initial search, only 11 were finally included in the qualitative review. Analysis according to Terwee and COSMIN criteria showed that the Foot Health Status Questionnaire (FHSQ) presented the greatest number of positive values. Conclusions: The FHSQ is the highest-quality PROM currently available for the foot and ankle, for patients with DM.

Spanish Cultural Adaptation of the Questionnaire Early Arthritis for Psoriatic Patients

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

The Early Arthritis for Psoriatic patients (EARP) questionnaire is a screening tool for psoriatic arthritis. The original Italian version has good measurement properties but the EARP required translation and adaptation for use in Spain. This article describes the cultural adaptation process as a step prior to validation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We used the principles of good practice for the cross-cultural adaptation of patient-reported outcomes measurement established by the International Society Pharmacoeconomics and Outcome Research. The steps in this process were preparation, forward translation, reconciliation, back-translation and review, harmonization, cognitive debriefing and review, and proofreading. During preparation the developers of the original questionnaire were asked for their permission to adapt the EARP for use in Spain and to act as consultants during the process.

RESULTS

The original questionnaire was translated into Spanish by native Spanish translators, who made slight changes that were approved by the questionnaire's developers. The Spanish version was then back-translated into Italian; that version was reviewed to confirm equivalence with the original Italian text. The reconciled Spanish EARP was then tested for comprehensibility and interpretation in a group of 35 patients. All the patients answered all items without making additional comments.

CONCLUSION

This cultural adaptation of the EARP questionnaire for Spanish populations is the first step towards its later use in routine clinical practice. The application of a cross-cultural adaptation method ensured equivalence between the original and Spanish versions of the EARP. The Spanish questionnaire will be validated in a second stage.

Cellular and molecular aspects of diabetic nephropathy; the role of VEGF-A

The prevalence of diabetes mellitus increased during the last century and it is estimated that 45% of the patients are not diagnosed. In South America the prevalence of diabetes and chronic kidney disease (CKD) increased, with a great disparity among the countries with respect to access to dialysis. In Ecuador it is one of the main causes of mortality, principally in the provinces located on the coast of the Pacific Ocean. The greatest single cause of beginning dialysis is diabetic nephropathy (DN). Even using the best therapeutic options for DN, the residual risk of proteinuria and of terminal CKD remains high. In this review we indicate the importance of the problem globally and in our region. We analyse relevant cellular and molecular studies that illustrate the crucial significance of glomerular events in DN development and evolution and in insulin resistance. We include basic anatomical, pathophysiological and clinical concepts, with special attention to the role of angiogenic factors such as the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF-A) and their relationship to the insulin receptor, endothelial isoform of nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) and angiopoietins. We also propose various pathways that have therapeutic potential in our opinion. Greater in-depth study of VEGF-A and angiopoietins, the state of glomerular VEGF resistance, the relationship of VEGF receptor 2/nephrin, VEGF/insulin receptors/nephrin and the relationship of VEGF/eNOS-NO at glomerular level could provide solutions to the pressing world problem of DN and generate new treatment alternatives.