Diabetes mellitus in pregnancy. What are the best treatment options?

Comparison of Glibenclamide and Insulin on Neonatal Outcomes in Pregnant Women with Gestational Diabetes

BACKGROUND

Untreated or poorly controlled gestational diabetes can cause serious complications for mother and newborn. Glibenclamide is rarely used in treating mothers with this disease. This study aimed at comparing the effect of glibenclamide and insulin on neonatal outcomes in women with gestational diabetes mellitus.

METHODS

In this randomized controlled clinical trial, 249 pregnant women aged 18-45 years within the 11(th)-33(rd) weeks of gestation with gestational diabetes, single fetus pregnancy, and in need of hyperglycemia treatment were entered and grouped randomly as either glibenclamide or insulin. In the insulin group (n = 129), insulin was administered with an initial dose of 0.2 IU/kg subcutaneously twice per day, whereas in the glibenclamide group (n = 120), 1.25 mg oral glibenclamide was administered once daily and increased if needed.

RESULTS

The results showed no significant difference in means age, gestational age, and body mass index between women in the two groups. In addition, there were no significant differences in the frequency of neonatal hypoglycemia, anomaly, hyperbilirubinemia, admission in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU), and neonatal respiratory distress between two groups. Macrosomia was lower in the glibenclamide group than the insulin group (3.3% vs. 13.2%, respectively, P = 0.005). Regression logistics model results showed that the type of treatment (odds ratio [OR]: 4.62; confidence interval [CI]: 1.45-14.02; P = 0.01) and gestational age at delivery (OR: 1.41; CI: 1.04-1.74; P = 0.01) were as predictor factors of macrosomia.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study revealed that glibenclamide is able to reduce the risk of fetal macrosomia without increasing neonatal anomalies, jaundice, hypocalcemia, infant respiratory distress, and NICU admission.

Diabetes-induced birth defects: what do we know? What can we do?

Birth defects are the leading cause of infant mortality in the United States, which has one of the highest infant mortality rates in the developed world. Many of these birth defects can be attributed to pre-existing, or pregestational, diabetes in pregnancy, which significantly increases a mother's risk of having a child with a major birth defect. Strict preconceptional and early pregnancy glucose control, supplementation with multivitamins and fatty acids, and lower glycemic dietary management have been shown to reduce the incidence of birth defects in experimental and epidemiologic studies. However, because more than half of pregnancies are unplanned, these methods are not generalizable across the population. Thus, better interventions are urgently needed. Based on what we know about the molecular pathophysiology of diabetic embryopathy, our laboratory and others are developing interventions against to key molecular targets in this multifactorial disease process.

A 10-year retrospective analysis of pregnancy outcome in pregestational Type 2 diabetes: comparison of insulin and oral glucose-lowering agents

AIMS

To review the use of oral glucose-lowering agents (OGLA) in pregnant women with Type 2 diabetes mellitus.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of outcomes and their predictors in singleton pregnancies > or = 24 weeks managed at Groote Schuur hospital, Cape Town, South Africa from 1991 to 2000. There were 379 pregnancies, subdivided into three groups according to therapy: OGLA alone, converted from OGLA to insulin, insulin alone or converted from diet alone to insulin. The OGLA used were metformin and glibenclamide.

RESULTS

Mean glycated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)) was similar at booking and throughout pregnancy in all groups. In the OGLA alone, converted from OGLA to insulin and insulin alone/converted from diet alone to insulin groups, fetal anomaly rates were comparable: 5.7%, 2.0% and 0.0%, P = 0.2, respectively; whereas perinatal mortality rates (per 1000 births) were: 125, 28, 33, P = 0.003, respectively. Booking HbA(1c) was independently associated with fetal anomaly [odds ratio (OR) 1.48; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.11, 1.97; P = 0.006]. The specific OGLA used in the first trimester was not associated with the occurrence of fetal anomaly. Last HbA(1c) (OR 1.65; 95% CI 1.16, 2.42; P = 0.005) and fetal anomaly (OR 15.18; 95% CI 2.43, 93.37; P = 0.005) were independently associated with perinatal mortality. Conversion from OGLA to insulin was protective for perinatal mortality compared with OGLA alone treatment (OR 0.220; 95% CI 0.061, 0.756; P = 0.024). No perinatal mortality was observed in women on metformin alone.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that metformin and glibenclamide are not teratogenic but that it is advisable to replace OGLA, in particular glibenclamide, with insulin when women book for pregnancy care to reduce perinatal mortality rates.

Optimizing insulin therapy in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes mellitus

Pregnancy complicated by type 1 diabetes mellitus is associated with an increased risk of complications in the mother and infant. Normal or near normal glycemic control prior to and during pregnancy reduces many of these risks to levels observed in the general population. This degree of glycemic control is generally achievable only with intensive insulin therapy: multiple daily injections (MDI) or continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) via an insulin pump. These therapeutic regimens have been found to result in comparable glycemic control, although CSII provides increased flexibility in terms of patient lifestyle, and may reduce the incidence of hypoglycemia. Frequent home blood glucose monitoring is imperative during pregnancy in order to optimize glycemic control and reduce the risk of hypoglycemia. Furthermore, insulin requirements change significantly over the course of pregnancy. The new short-acting insulin analogs, insulin lispro and insulin aspart, have pharmacodynamic properties which make them ideal for use during pregnancy. Although the number of published studies evaluating the use of insulin lispro during pregnancy is limited, the majority support its safety. No studies of insulin aspart in pregnancy have been published in full. In addition to optimization of glycemic control, frequent assessment for development and/or progression of microvascular complications is necessary during pregnancy.

Diabetes mellitus in pregnancy in an African population

OBJECTIVES

To compare the pregnancy outcome among diabetic and non-diabetic Nigerian women.

METHODS

A retrospective case record review of 200 pregnant diabetic patients and control was carried out over a 10-year period (1990-1999) at the Maternity unit of the University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital Enugu, Nigeria.

RESULTS

The prevalence of diabetes mellitus among pregnant mothers was 1.7%. Pre-gestational diabetes mellitus accounted for 39% of cases while gestational diabetes was responsible for 61% of them. Late antenatal booking and poor control of diabetes mellitus were common features, while maternal and fetal morbidity was high. Hypertension, vulvovaginitis, premature labor, polyhydramnios and ketoacidosis were significantly higher among diabetic mothers than controls. The perinatal mortality was also higher among diabetics than controls (12.5% vs. 3.5%) with stillbirth being the major contributor. Patients with gestational diabetes were at increased risk of fetal macrosomia than controls (28.7% vs. 5.5%). The overall cesarean section rate was high (36%) among diabetics with previous cesarean section and cephalopelvic disproportion being the commonest indications.

CONCLUSIONS

Health education and provision of modern affordable methods of management of diagnosed cases such as uristix and hemastix will improve maternal and fetal outcome in pregnant diabetics in Africa.

Determination of a diabetes control and complications trial-aligned HbA(1c) reference range in pregnancy

A diabetes control and complications trial (DCCT)-aligned 95% inter-fractile reference range for glycated haemoglobin in non-diabetic pregnancy was determined as 4.1-5.9% (n=493; two-sided 90% confidence intervals around the lower and upper limits are 4.0-4.2% and 5.8-6.0%, respectively).

Advances in management of Type 1 diabetes and pregnancy

Obstetricians will need to update themselves on the recent changes in terminology and in diagnostic criteria for Type 1 diabetes mellitus. This still remains a high-risk obstetric situation, in spite of optimistic reports from centres of excellence. Pregnancy-associated hypertension may be closely related to insulin resistance. A number of concepts and hypotheses are based on the central role of insulin in fetal development.