A risk-benefit assessment of natural and synthetic exogenous surfactants in the management of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome

Inhaled Medicines: Past, Present, and Future

The purpose of this review is to summarize essential pharmacological, pharmaceutical, and clinical aspects in the field of orally inhaled therapies that may help scientists seeking to develop new products. After general comments on the rationale for inhaled therapies for respiratory disease, the focus is on products approved approximately over the last half a century. The organization of these sections reflects the key pharmacological categories. Products for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease include β -2 receptor agonists, muscarinic acetylcholine receptor antagonists, glucocorticosteroids, and cromones as well as their combinations. The antiviral and antibacterial inhaled products to treat respiratory tract infections are then presented. Two "mucoactive" products-dornase α and mannitol, which are both approved for patients with cystic fibrosis-are reviewed. These are followed by sections on inhaled prostacyclins for pulmonary arterial hypertension and the challenging field of aerosol surfactant inhalation delivery, especially for prematurely born infants on ventilation support. The approved products for systemic delivery via the lungs for diseases of the central nervous system and insulin for diabetes are also discussed. New technologies for drug delivery by inhalation are analyzed, with the emphasis on those that would likely yield significant improvements over the technologies in current use or would expand the range of drugs and diseases treatable by this route of administration. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This review of the key aspects of approved orally inhaled drug products for a variety of respiratory diseases and for systemic administration should be helpful in making judicious decisions about the development of new or improved inhaled drugs. These aspects include the choices of the active ingredients, formulations, delivery systems suitable for the target patient populations, and, to some extent, meaningful safety and efficacy endpoints in clinical trials.

Cost effectiveness of prevention and treatment of neonatal respiratory distress (RDS) with exogenous surfactant: what has changed in the last three decades?

In 1993, exogenous surfactant products were emerging as licensed treatments for respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), a leading cause of death in preterm newborn babies. Models of cost-effectiveness of alternative treatments showed surfactant to be an expensive but effective and also cost effective treatment. However the most efficient policy for use of surfactant depended on other parallel 'technologies' such as giving antenatal corticosteroids where preterm delivery is anticipated. Following introduction into clinical practice, questions changed from whether to use surfactant, to when, and which product to use. The early models of cost effectiveness were dependent on the neonatal technology in use, and on the costs of neonatal care and prices of surfactant at the time. Little information was available about long term outcomes. The aims of this paper are to summarise the role of surfactant in the economics of newborn care since the late 1980s; to observe the value of studies published in the early 1990s for current decisions; and to comment on recent and possible future economic studies of neonatal surfactant.

Calfactant: a review of its use in neonatal respiratory distress syndrome

Calfactant (Infasurt) is a natural bovine surfactant which has been evaluated for intratracheal use in the prevention and rescue treatment of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) in preterm infants. In 2 randomised, double-blind, multicentre clinical trials of prophylactic use, calfactant 100 or 105 mg phospholipid per kg bodyweight (mg/kg) reduced RDS incidence, RDS severity and mortality rates to a greater extent than colfosceril palmitate (Exosurf Neonatal) 67.5 mg/kg and was generally similar to beractant (Survanta) 100 mg/kg. Although the rate of mortality before discharge from hospital was significantly higher in infants with birthweights <600 g who received calfactant than in those who received beractant, this may not be a typical result. As rescue treatment, calfactant 100 or 105 mg/kg reduced RDS severity, but not mortality rates, significantly more than colfosceril palmitate 67.5 mg/kg or beractant 100 mg/kg in 2 randomised, double-blind, multicentre clinical trials. In addition, the duration of effect of calfactant as prophylaxis or rescue treatment appeared to be longer than that of beractant. In other randomised trials, prophylaxis was more effective than rescue treatment with calfactant, particularly in infants of < or =29 weeks gestational age. The incidence of pulmonary air leak events was lower with calfactant than with colfosceril palmitate (12 vs 22%) but was identical with calfactant and beractant (15% with either agent). The incidence of other complications associated with RDS was usually similar with all 3 agents in clinical trials in preterm infants. The incidence of intraventricular haemorrhage was significantly higher in 1 clinical trial, and that of septicaemia was significantly lower in another, with calfactant versus colfosceril palmitate, but the combined incidences of these complications was similar with the 2 agents when results from different trials were pooled. The incidence of acute adverse events (i.e. those which occurred during administration of the drug) with calfactant was similar to that with beractant and higher than that with colfosceril palmitate; the difference may been related to reduced RDS severity in calfactant versus colfosceril palmitate recipients. Acute adverse events were usually transient and not severe.

CONCLUSIONS

Calfactant is a well tolerated natural bovine surfactant which is effective in the prevention and treatment of RDS in preterm infants. Further investigation is needed to more clearly determine the efficacy and tolerability of calfactant relative to that of other surfactant preparations. When more data are available, it is likely that calfactant will be useful as an alternative to beractant (at least in infants of birthweights >600 g), and calfactant may be preferred over colfosceril palmitate in both the prophylaxis and treatment of RDS.