Safety profile of tolterodine as used in general practice in England: results of prescription-event monitoring

Validation of risk-stratification method for the chronic atrioventricular block cynomolgus monkey model and its mechanistic interpretation using 6 drugs with pharmacologically-distinct profile

Validation of risk-stratification method for the chronic atrioventricular block cynomolgus monkey model and its mechanistic interpretation were performed using 6 pharmacologically-distinct drugs. The following drugs were orally administered in conscious state, astemizole: 1, 5 and 10 mg/kg (n = 6); haloperidol: 1, 10 and 30 mg/kg (n = 5); amiodarone: 30 mg/kg (n = 4); famotidine: 10 mg/kg (n = 4); levofloxacin: 100 mg/kg (n = 4); and tolterodine: 0.2, 1 and 4.5 mg/kg (n = 4). Astemizole of 5 and 10 mg/kg significantly prolonged ΔΔQTcF, whereas no significant change was observed by the others. Torsade de pointes (TdP) was induced by astemizole of 5 and 10 mg/kg in 3/6 and 6/6, and by haloperidol of 10 and 30 mg/kg in 1/5 and 1/5, respectively, which was not observed in the others. Torsadogenic risk of the drugs was quantified using the criteria for the monkey model specified in our previous study. Namely, high-risk drugs induced TdP at ≤ 3times of their maximum clinical daily dose. Intermediate-risk drugs did not induce TdP at this dose range, but induced it at higher doses. Low/no-risk drugs never induced TdP at any dose tested. The magnitude of risk was intermediate for astemizole and haloperidol, and low/no risk for the others. The pre-specified, risk-stratification method for the monkey model may solve the issue existing between non-clinical models and patients with labile repolarization, which can reinforce the regulatory decision-making and labelling at time of marketing application of non-double-negative drug candidate (hERG assay positive and/or in vivo QT study positive).

Cardiovascular effects of antimuscarinic agents and beta3-adrenergic receptor agonist for the treatment of overactive bladder

INTRODUCTION

Overactive bladder (OAB) syndrome is common in the general population, particularly in elderly patients. Antimuscarinic drugs (AMs) are considered the mainstay pharmaceutical treatment of OAB whereas β3-adrenoceptor agonists, such as mirabegron, represent a good alternative. Owing to the important role of muscarinic and β3 receptors in cardiovascular (CV) tissue and to the fact that OAB patients often have CV comorbidities, the safety-profile of these drugs constitute an important challenge.

AREAS COVERED

The aim of this review is to evaluate the CV effects of AMs and mirabegron in OAB. A systematic literature search from inception until December 2017 was performed on PubMed and Medline.

EXPERT OPINION

AMs are generally considered to have good CV safety profile but, however, they may cause undesirable adverse events, such as dry mouth, constipation. CV AEs are rare but noteworthy, the most common CV consequences related to the use of these drugs are constituted by an increase in HR and QT interval. Mirabegron has similar efficacy and tolerability to AMs but causes less adverse events, with either modest hypertension and modest increase in HR (<5 bpm) being the most commonly reported.

Development of a core set of outcome measures for OAB treatment

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Standardized measures enable the comparison of outcomes across providers and treatments giving valuable information for improving care quality and efficacy. The aim of this project was to define a minimum standard set of outcome measures and case-mix factors for evaluating the care of patients with overactive bladder (OAB).

METHODS

The International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM) convened an international working group (WG) of leading clinicians and patients to engage in a structured method for developing a core outcome set. Consensus was determined by a modified Delphi process, and discussions were supported by both literature review and patient input.

RESULTS

The standard set measures outcomes of care for adults seeking treatment for OAB, excluding residents of long-term care facilities. The WG focused on treatment outcomes identified as most important key outcome domains to patients: symptom burden and bother, physical functioning, emotional health, impact of symptoms and treatment on quality of life, and success of treatment. Demographic information and case-mix factors that may affect these outcomes were also included.

CONCLUSIONS

The standardized outcome set for evaluating clinical care is appropriate for use by all health providers caring for patients with OAB, regardless of specialty or geographic location, and provides key data for quality improvement activities and research.

Adverse Drug Reactions in the Orofacial Region

A wide spectrum of drugs can sometimes give rise to numerous adverse orofacial manifestations, particularly dry mouth, taste disturbances, oral mucosal ulceration, and/or gingival swelling. There are few relevant randomized double-blind controlled studies in this field, and therefore this paper reviews the data from case reports, small series, and non-peer-reviewed reports of adverse drug reactions affecting the orofacial region (available from a MEDLINE search to April, 2003). The more common and significant adverse orofacial consequences of drug therapy are discussed.

Tolterodine reduces veratridine-augmented late INa, reverse-INCX and early afterdepolarizations in isolated rabbit ventricular myocytes

AIM

The augmentation of late sodium current (I_Na.L) not only causes intracellular Na⁺ accumulation, which results in intracellular Ca²⁺ overload via the reverse mode of the Na⁺/Ca²⁺ exchange current (reverse-I_NCX), but also prolongs APD and induces early afterdepolarizations (EAD), which can lead to arrhythmia and cardiac dysfunction. Thus, the inhibition of I_Na.L is considered to be a potential way for therapeutic intervention in ischemia and heart failure. In this study we investigated the effects of tolterodine (Tol), a competitive muscarinic receptor antagonist, on normal and veratridine (Ver)-augmented I_Na.L, reverse-I_NCX and APD in isolated rabbit ventricular myocytes, which might contribute to its cardioprotective activity.

METHODS

Rabbit ventricular myocytes were prepared. The I_Na.L and reverse-I_NCX were recorded in voltage clamp mode, whereas action potentials and Ver-induced early afterdepolarizations (EADs) were recorded in current clamp mode. Drugs were applied via superfusion.

RESULTS

Tol (3-120 nmol/L) concentration-dependently inhibited the normal and Ver-augmented I_Na.L with IC₅₀ values of 32.08 nmol/L and 42.47 nmol/L, respectively. Atropine (100 μmol/L) did not affect the inhibitory effects of Tol (30 nmol/L) on Ver-augmented I_Na.L. In contrast, much high concentrations of Tol was needed to inhibit the transient sodium current (I_Na.T) with an IC₅₀ value of 183.03 μmol/L. In addition, Tol (30 nmol/L) significantly shifted the inactivation curve of I_Na.T toward a more depolarizing membrane potential without affecting its activation characteristics. Moreover, Tol (30 nmol/L) significantly decreased Ver-augmented reverse-I_NCX. Tol (30 nmol/L) increased the action potential duration (APD) by 16% under the basal conditions. Ver (20 μmol/L) considerably extended the APD and evoked EADs in 18/24 cells (75%). In the presence of Ver, Tol (30 nmol/L) markedly decreased the APD and eliminated EADs (0/24 cells).

CONCLUSION

Tol inhibits normal and Ver-augmented I_NaL and decreases Ver-augmented reverse-I_NCX. In addition, Tol reverses the prolongation of the APD and eliminates the EADs induced by Ver, thus prevents Ver-induced arrhythmia.

Delirium following fesoterodine treatment for urgency incontinence in an 89-year old man

We describe the case of an 89-year-old man who developed delirium following the introduction of fesoterodine to treat his urgency incontinence. The patient started experiencing visual hallucinations approximately five days after starting fesoterodine 4 mg once daily. Delirium resolved after fesoterodine was stopped. Despite the apparent safe cognitive profile due to its pharmacodynamic properties, fesoterodine should be used with caution in the elderly, frail population.

Risk of a lamotrigine-related skin rash: current meta-analysis and postmarketing cohort analysis

PURPOSE

We systematically reviewed studies to provide current evidence on the incidence and risk of skin rash in patients with LTG therapy.

METHODS

PubMed and Scopus databases, up to 15 March 2014 were searched to identify relevant studies. Eligible studies included prospective studies, retrospective studies and postmarketing reports, which included data of skin rash in patients with LTG therapy.

RESULTS

Forty-one articles met the entry criteria. A total of 4447 patients with LTG therapy from 26 prospective studies, 2977 patients from 8 retrospective studies, and 26,126 patients from 5/7 postmarketing reports were included. The overall incidence of skin rash with LTG therapy was 9.98% (444/4447) from prospective studies, 7.19% (214/2977) from retrospective studies, and 2.09% (547/26,126) from postmarketing reports. A meta-analysis of the risk of skin rash in 21 prospective studies, did not show a significant difference between patients with LTG and other drugs, including placebo, other ADEs or lithium (OR 0.99-2.41). In 6 respective studies, there was a significantly higher OR in patients with LTG compared with those with non-aromatic AEDs. However, there was no significant difference in rash risk between patients with LTG and aromatic AEDs.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study showed that LTG significantly increased the risk of developing a skin rash compared to non-aromatic AEDs. Our results support the need for large prospective population-based studies and clinical trials to determine whether LTG increases the risk of developing a skin rash than compared to other drugs.

Efficacy and safety of propiverine and terazosine combination for one year in male patients with luts and detrusor overactivity

PURPOSE

To evaluate the long term efficacy and safety of the use of propiverine and terazosine combination in patients with LUTS and DO by a placebo controlled study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred patients were enrolled in the study. They were randomized into two groups (each group consisted of 50 patients). Terazosine and placebo were administered to the patients in Group 1 and terazosine plus propiverine HCL was administered to Group 2. The patients were evaluated by international prostate symptom score (IPSS), the first four questions of IPSS (IPSS4), the 8th question of IPSS (quality of life-QoL), overactive bladder symptom score questionnaire (OAB-q V8), PSA test, urodynamic studies, post voiding residue (PVR). All patients were followed for one year and were reassessed for comparison.

RESULTS

IPSS, IPSS4, OAB symptoms, QoL score, PVR, and Qmax scores of the groups did not differ. After one year treatment, there was significant improvement in IPSS, IPSS4, OAB symptoms, QoL and Qmax values in Group 2. No significant improvement was noted for the same parameters in Group 1.

CONCLUSION

This is the first study to show long term safety and efficacy of anticholinergic therapy for patients with LUTS. In patients with OAB or DO, long term anticholinergic treatment may be regarded as a treatment option.

CLINICAL HETEROGENEITY IN SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS AND HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENTS: SYNTHESIS OF GUIDANCE DOCUMENTS AND THE LITERATURE

Objectives: The aim of this study was to synthesize best practices for addressing clinical heterogeneity in systematic reviews and health technology assessments (HTAs).

Methods: We abstracted information from guidance documents and methods manuals made available by international organizations that develop systematic reviews and HTAs. We searched PubMed® to identify studies on clinical heterogeneity and subgroup analysis. Two authors independently abstracted and assessed relevant information.

Results: Methods manuals offer various definitions of clinical heterogeneity. In essence, clinical heterogeneity is considered variability in study population characteristics, interventions, and outcomes across studies. It can lead to effect-measure modification or statistical heterogeneity, which is defined as variability in estimated treatment effects beyond what would be expected by random error alone. Clinical and statistical heterogeneity are closely intertwined but they do not have a one-to-one relationship. The presence of statistical heterogeneity does not necessarily indicate that clinical heterogeneity is the causal factor. Methodological heterogeneity, biases, and random error can also cause statistical heterogeneity, alone or in combination with clinical heterogeneity.

Conclusions: Identifying potential modifiers of treatment effects (i.e., effect-measure modifiers) is important for researchers conducting systematic reviews and HTAs. Recognizing clinical heterogeneity and clarifying its implications helps decision makers to identify patients and patient populations who benefit the most, who benefit the least, and who are at greatest risk of experiencing adverse outcomes from a particular intervention.

Differences in efficacy and safety of pharmaceutical treatments between men and women: an umbrella review

Being male or female is an important determinant of risks for certain diseases, patterns of illness and life expectancy. Although differences in risks for and prognoses of several diseases have been well documented, sex-based differences in responses to pharmaceutical treatments and accompanying risks of adverse events are less clear. The objective of this umbrella review was to determine whether clinically relevant differences in efficacy and safety of commonly prescribed medications exist between men and women. We retrieved all available systematic reviews of the Oregon Drug Effectiveness Review Project published before January 2010. Two persons independently reviewed each report to identify relevant studies. We dually abstracted data from the original publications into standardized forms. We synthesized the available evidence for each drug class and rated its quality applying the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach. Findings, based on 59 studies and data of more than 250,000 patients suggested that for the majority of drugs no substantial differences in efficacy and safety exist between men and women. Some clinically important exceptions, however, were apparent: women experienced substantially lower response rates with newer antiemetics than men (45% vs. 58%; relative risk 1.49, 95% confidence interval 1.35–1.64); men had higher rates of sexual dysfunction than women while on paroxetine for major depressive disorder; women discontinued lovastatin more frequently than men because of adverse events. Overall, for the majority of drugs sex does not appear to be a factor that has to be taken into consideration when choosing a drug treatment. The available body of evidence, however, was limited in quality and quantity, confining the range and certainty of our conclusions.

Safety and efficacy of tolterodine extended release in men with overactive bladder symptoms and presumed non-obstructive benign prostatic hyperplasia

Patients with presumed non-obstructive BPH (Q (max )>or= 15 ml/s) treated with tolterodine ER 4 mg/day for OAB symptoms, alone or added to unsuccessful alpha-blocker treatment of >or=6 weeks duration, were observed for 12 weeks in a non-interventional study to generate real-life efficacy and safety data. Patients completed the IPSS, the OAB-q and a 2-day micturition diary at baseline and 12 weeks. PVR was determined sonographically. Seven hundred and forty one patients were analysed. Mean PVR did not increase (25.4 +/- 26.5 vs. 29.3 +/- 30.9 ml at baseline). AUR requiring catheterization occurred in two patients, acute UTI in four patients. Median IPSS total scores decreased from 17 to 10, IPSS QoL scores from 4 to 2, OAB-q symptom bother scores from 50.0 to 22.5 and OAB-q HRQL scores increased from 59.2 to 81.6. In men with OAB symptoms and presumed non-obstructive BPH, tolterodine ER provided considerable symptomatic and QoL improvements with a low risk of AUR, acute UTI, or increased PVR.

Thorough QT Study with Recommended and Supratherapeutic Doses of Tolterodine

The objective of our study was to determine the QTc effects of tolterodine. A crossover-design thorough QT study of recommended (2 mg twice daily) and supratherapeutic (4 mg twice daily) doses of tolterodine, moxifloxacin (400 mg once daily), and placebo was performed. Electrocardiograms (ECGs) and pharmacokinetic samples were obtained on days 1-4; time-matched baseline ECGs were taken on day 0. Mean placebo-subtracted change from baseline Fridericia-corrected QT (QTcF) during peak drug exposure on day 4 was the primary end point. Mean QTcF prolongation of moxifloxacin was 8.9 ms (machine-read) and 19.3 ms (manual-read). At recommended and supratherapeutic tolterodine doses, mean QTcF prolongation was 1.2 and 5.6 ms (machine-read), respectively, and 5.0 and 11.8 ms (manual-read), respectively. The QTc effect of tolterodine was lower than moxifloxacin. No subject receiving tolterodine exceeded the clinically relevant thresholds of 500 ms absolute QTc or 60 ms change from baseline. In conclusion, tolterodine does not have a clinically significant effect on QT interval.

In Vitro Preclinical Cardiac Assessment of Tolterodine and Terodiline: Multiple Factors Predict the Clinical Experience

Terodiline and tolterodine are drugs used to treat urinary incontinence. Terodiline was removed from the market in 1991 for proarrhythmia, whereas tolterodine has a generally benign clinical cardiac profile. To assess differences in the electrophysiologic actions of these drugs, we evaluated their effects on hERG current (HEK cells) and cardiac Purkinje fiber repolarization. The IC50 for hERG block (37 degrees C) by tolterodine was 9.6 nM and by terodiline was 375 nM, values near or below clinical concentrations. Tolterodine elicited concentration-dependent prolongation of the action potential duration (APD90). In contrast, terodiline depressed the action potential plateau and induced triangulation without affecting APD90. The triangulation ratios (normalized ratio of APD50 over APD90) for terodiline were 0.94 and 0.59 for 1.0 and 10 microM and for tolterodine, were 0.99 and 0.97 at 7 and 70 nM. In summary, tolterodine, a potent hERG blocker, has a benign clinical cardiac profile at therapeutic concentrations that may be due to its lack of triangulation, as well as extensive plasma protein binding. However, at supratherapeutic concentrations, preclinical data predict risk of QT prolongation. These data suggest that hERG block and triangulation are among multiple factors that must be considered in preclinical cardiac safety assessments.

Efficacy and tolerability of darifenacin, a muscarinic M3 selective receptor antagonist (M3 SRA), compared with oxybutynin in the treatment of patients with overactive bladder

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, four-way crossover, safety study of darifenacin versus oxybutynin was carried out on 76 patients with overactive bladder (OAB). Adults with OAB received 2 weeks each of darifenacin 15 and 30 mg once daily (q.d.), oxybutynin 5 mg three times daily (t.i.d.) and placebo, in random sequence at 10-day intervals. Darifenacin and oxybutynin significantly reduced incontinence episodes, and the number/severity of urgency episodes (all P<0.05 versus placebo). Improvements in OAB symptoms with darifenacin were dose-dependent. Dry mouth was less common with darifenacin 15 mg than oxybutynin (13% and 36%; P<0.05), while constipation was comparable (10% and 8%, respectively). Corresponding rates for darifenacin 30 mg were 34% and 21%, respectively. Patients only reported blurred vision or dizziness with oxybutynin (3% and 2%, respectively). Darifenacin (15 mg q.d.) provides comparable efficacy with improved tolerability versus oxybutynin (5 mg t.i.d.) in the treatment of patients with OAB.

The safety and effectiveness of newer antiepileptics: a comparative postmarketing cohort study

Clinical trials for the newer antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) have provided inconclusive information to evaluate comparative risk benefit. The authors use data from postmarketing observational cohort studies to compare the failure of treatment with lamotrigine, vigabatrin, and gabapentin in patients with refractory epilepsy. The Drug Safety Research Unit has conducted prescription event monitoring (PEM) studies for lamotrigine, vigabatrin, and gabapentin to monitor their safety when used in primary care. The primary outcome of this study was time to treatment failure in patients who had been prescribed the drug after the start of the PEM study. Patients on gabapentin had reduced time to treatment failure compared to those on the other 2 drugs. The age- and sex-adjusted hazard ratio of failure was 1.53 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.38-1.70) for gabapentin compared to lamotrigine and 1.19 (95% CI = 1.10-1.30) for vigabatrin compared to lamotrigine. The observed differences between the 3 study drugs might be confounded by a higher proportion of patients treated with gabapentin having refractory epilepsy, a shorter duration of the gabapentin PEM study, and a lower relative dose of gabapentin (approved at the time of the PEM study). The current study provides information about the routine usage of newer AEDs, which complements evidence from clinical trials regarding the efficacy and safety of these AEDs. Although this study showed differences on times to treatment failure between lamotrigine, vigabatrin, and gabapentin, the results are only useful when considered together with results from other studies seeking to answer the same questions.

Darifenacin, an M3 selective receptor antagonist, is an effective and well-tolerated once-daily treatment for overactive bladder

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy, tolerability and safety of darifenacin, a once-daily M3) selective receptor antagonist (M3 SRA), in patients with overactive bladder (OAB).

METHODS

This multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study enrolled 561 patients (19-88 years; 85% female) with OAB symptoms for >6 months, and included some patients with prior exposure to antimuscarinic agents. After washout and a 2-week placebo run-in, patients were randomised (1:4:2:3) to once-daily oral darifenacin controlled-release tablets (3.75 mg [n=53], 7.5 mg [229] or 15 mg [n=115]) or matching placebo (n=164) for 12 weeks. Patients recorded daily incontinence episodes, micturition frequency, bladder capacity (mean volume voided), frequency of urgency, severity of urgency, incontinence episodes resulting in change of clothing or pads and nocturnal awakenings due to OAB using an electronic diary during weeks 2, 6 and 12 (directly preceding clinic visits). Tolerability data were evaluated from adverse event reports.

RESULTS

Darifenacin 7.5 mg and 15 mg had a rapid onset of effect, with significant improvement compared with placebo being seen for most parameters at the first clinic visit (week 2). This effect was sustained through week 12. At this time the number of incontinence episodes per week was reduced from baseline by 67.7% with darifenacin 7.5 mg and 72.8% with darifenacin 15 mg compared with 55.9% with placebo (p=0.010 and p=0.017, respectively, versus placebo). The 3.75 mg group (null dose arm) was included for proof of concept of dose flexibility, therefore formal sample sizing and statistical analysis were not performed for this group. Darifenacin 7.5 mg and 15 mg, respectively, were significantly superior to placebo for improvements in micturition frequency (p<0.001, p<0.001), bladder capacity (p<0.040, p<0.001), frequency of urgency (p<0.001, p=0.005), severity of urgency (p<0.001, p=0.002) and number of incontinence episodes leading to a change in clothing or pads (p<0.001, p=0.002). There was no significant reduction in nocturnal awakenings due to OAB. The most common adverse events were mild-to-moderate dry mouth and constipation. However, no patients withdrew from the study as a result of dry mouth and discontinuation related to constipation was rare (0.6% placebo versus 0.9% darifenacin). In addition, there was a low need for laxative use, with no difference between the darifenacin groups and those taking placebo. There were no reports of blurred vision and the CNS and cardiac safety profile was comparable to placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

Darifenacin significantly improves the major symptoms of OAB. No significant CNS (primarily M1-receptor mediated) adverse events or cardiac (primarily M2-receptor mediated) adverse events were identified in this study, as may be predicted from the M3 selective receptor profile of darifenacin.

Cardiac Ion Channel Effects of Tolterodine

Tolterodine is a muscarinic antagonist widely used in the treatment of urinary incontinence. Although tolterodine has not been reported to alter cardiac repolarization, it is chemically related to other muscarinic antagonists known to prolong cardiac repolarization. For this reason, we studied the effects of tolterodine on cardiac ion channels and action potential recordings. Using patch-clamp electrophysiology, we found that tolterodine was a potent antagonist of the human ether-a-go-go-related gene (HERG) K(+) channel, displaying an IC(50) value of 17 nM. This potency was similar to that observed for the antiarrhythmic drug dofetilide (IC(50) of 11 nM). Tolterodine block of HERG displayed a positive voltage dependence, suggesting an interaction with an activated state. Tolterodine had little effect on the human cardiac Na(+) channel at concentrations of up to 1 microM. Inhibition of L-type Ca(2+) currents by tolterodine was frequency-dependent with IC(50) values measuring 143 and 1084 nM at 1 and 0.1 Hz, respectively. Both tolterodine and dofetilide prolonged action potential duration in single guinea pig myocytes over the concentration range of 3 to 100 nM. However, prolongation was significantly larger for dofetilide compared with tolterodine. Tolterodine seems to be an unusual drug in that it blocks HERG with high affinity, but produces little QT prolongation clinically. Low plasma levels after therapeutic doses combined with mixed ion channel effects, most notably Ca(2+) channel blockade, may serve to attenuate the QT prolonging effects of this potent HERG channel antagonist.

Benefit-Risk Assessment of Tolterodine in the Treatment of Overactive Bladder in Adults

Overactive bladder is associated with symptoms of urgency, with or without urge incontinence, usually with daytime frequency and nocturia in the absence of local pathological factors. Muscarinic receptor antagonists (antimuscarinics) are the first-line pharmacotherapy. Tolterodine, a competitive, nonselective antimuscarinic specifically developed for the treatment of overactive bladder, demonstrated tissue selectivity for the bladder over the parotid gland in an animal model. As of March 5, 2003, the immediate-release (IR) formulation had been approved in 72 countries and the extended-release (ER) formulation had been approved in 28 countries, and tolterodine had been administered to 5 million patients. This review evaluates the benefit-risk profile of tolterodine in the treatment of adults with overactive bladder, summarising clinical trial and postmarketing surveillance data. Tolterodine has been found to significantly reduce micturition frequency, urgency perception and the number of episodes of urge incontinence and increase the volume voided per micturition. Dry mouth, an antimuscarinic class effect, is the most commonly reported adverse effect but is mostly mild to moderate in severity. Serious adverse effects are reported infrequently. Based on summary and review of postmarketing surveillance and clinical trial safety data received by the market authorization holder and contained in the Periodic Safety Update Reports for tolterodine, several monitored serious events of the gastrointestinal tract (e.g. ileus or haemorrhage), nervous system (e.g. syncope, convulsions and memory disorders) and cardiovascular system (e.g. ventricular arrhythmia, atrial fibrillation, palpitations, bradycardia, transient ischaemic attacks and hypertension) were not considered related to tolterodine. QT or corrected QT (QTc) prolongation was not observed in any of the five cases of verified ventricular arrhythmia in patients administered tolterodine; there is insufficient evidence to indicate that tolterodine causes ventricular arrhythmia or extrasystoles or any specific type of cardiac rhythm abnormality. The safety profile of tolterodine is similar in patients aged > or =65 years and in younger adults. Clinically relevant drug interactions are limited to cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibitors, such as ketoconazole, and co-administration with such agents warrants a tolterodine dosage decrease. In addition, tolterodine IR 2mg twice daily is similar in efficacy to oxybutynin IR 5mg three times daily, and tolterodine ER 4 mg once daily is similar in efficacy to oxybutynin ER 10mg once daily. Dry mouth occurred less frequently with tolterodine than oxybutynin, and moderate to severe dry mouth occurred more than three times less frequently. Based on the low frequency of adverse events, the absence of unexpected adverse events and the very low frequency of serious adverse events, we conclude that tolterodine is a well tolerated treatment for overactive bladder in adults, in whom it should be considered as first-line therapy.

Drug effects on salivary glands: dry mouth

OBJECTIVE

To identify drugs associated with the complaint of dry mouth.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

MEDLINE was searched for papers 1980-2002 using keywords, oral, mouth, salivary, drugs, dry mouth and xerostomia, and relevant secondary references were hand-searched.

RESULTS

Evidence was forthcoming for a number of xerogenic drugs, especially antimuscarinic agents, some sympathomimetic agents, and agents affecting serotonin and noradrenaline uptake, as well as a miscellany of other drugs such as appetite suppressants, protease inhibitors and cytokines.

CONCLUSION

Dry mouth has a variety of possible causes but drugs--especially those with anticholinergic activity against the M3 muscarinic receptor--are the most common cause of reduced salivation.

Automated signal generation in prescription-event monitoring

Signal generation is a method of highlighting potential safety issues in a drug that then need to be investigated further. Previously automated signal generation has mainly been applied to spontaneous reporting systems. The Drug Safety Research Unit (DSRU) performs observational postmarketing studies on selected newly marketed medicines in England using a method known as prescription-event monitoring (PEM). The DSRU has investigated automated procedures for the generation of signals using the event data from PEM studies. Proportional reporting ratios (PRRs) and incidence rate ratios (IRRs) were studied as possible tools for signal generation in PEM data. The PEM database contains 78 completed studies of drugs prescribed in primary care from a variety of therapeutic classes. Retrospective studies were carried out to identify the implications of changing the comparator group of drugs, along with analysing the results at different levels in the DSRU's hierarchical dictionary and performing signal generation after 30 and 180 days of observation since starting the drug. Automated signal generation is a useful hypothesis generating method that is likely to prove to be useful both in clinical trials and postmarketing studies. PRRs are simple to apply and do not require a denominator. IRRs take into account the time subjects were exposed to the drug prior to the event of interest, and offers a useful, and more in depth look into the data. However, with both methods it is important to perform signal generation at multiple levels in the dictionary and with careful selection of the comparator group.

Safety evaluation of the drugs available to prevent malaria

All drugs used for malaria prophylaxis have common adverse effects, in addition to rare and/or severe adverse effects. For many of the drugs in current use, the common adverse effects include neuropsychiatric harms. This property makes these drugs unpopular with tourists and business travellers, most of whom will be well at the start of chemoprophylaxis. Drugs available to prevent malaria have not been rigorously researched in terms of the phenomenology of their unwanted effects. Consequently, prescribers are not well placed to give useful information to travellers on the incidence, natural history and avoidability of the harms they may experience from malaria chemoprophylaxis. There is some evidence that the adverse effects of mefloquine may be a post-hepatic syndrome caused by drug-induced liver damage with, in some users, symptomatic thyroid disturbance. However, confusion in the interpretation of the scientific evidence has led to conflicting messages regarding the safety of mefloquine and other antimalaria drugs, and to incorrect self-therapy by individual travellers, sometimes with fatal outcomes. In this review, the existing knowledge base for the safety of drugs currently used to prevent malaria is described along with present designs for future studies that would allow a rigorous safety assessment of candidate chemoprophylactic agents and of new drugs introduced to prevent malaria. There is an urgent need for internationally-agreed, evidence-based malaria prevention guidelines. These guidelines should be explicitly linked to the best available research evidence (normally systematic reviews of trials and individual randomised trials) and should highlight gaps in the knowledge base as priority areas for research.