Drug interactions with angiotensin receptor blockers: a comparison with other antihypertensives

Pharmacogenomic study of heart failure and candesartan response from the CHARM programme

AIMS

The Candesartan in Heart failure Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) programme consisted of three parallel, randomized, double-blind clinical trials comparing candesartan with placebo in patients with heart failure (HF) categorized according to left ventricular ejection fraction and tolerability to an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor. We conducted a pharmacogenomic study of the CHARM trials with the objective of identifying genetic predictors of HF progression and of the efficacy and safety of treatment with candesartan.

METHODS

We performed genome-wide association studies in 2727 patients of European ancestry from CHARM-Overall and stratified by CHARM study according to preserved and reduced ejection fraction and according to assignment to the interventional treatment with candesartan. We tested genetic association with the composite endpoint of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure for drug efficacy in candesartan-treated patients and for HF progression using patients from both candesartan and placebo arms. The safety endpoints for response to candesartan were hyperkalaemia, renal dysfunction, hypotension, and change in systolic blood pressure between baseline and 6 weeks of treatment. To support our observations, we conducted a genome-wide gene-level collapsing analysis from whole-exome sequencing data with the composite cardiovascular endpoint.

RESULTS

We found that the A allele (14% allele frequency) of the genetic variant rs66886237 at 8p21.3 near the gene GFRA2 was associated with the composite cardiovascular endpoint in 1029 HF patients with preserved ejection fraction from the CHARM-Preserved study (hazard ratio: 1.91, 95% confidence interval: 1.55-2.35; P = 1.7 × 10^-9 ). The association was independent of candesartan treatment, and the genetic variant was not associated with the cardiovascular endpoint in patients with reduced ejection fraction. None of the genome-wide association studies for candesartan safety or efficacy conducted in patients treated with candesartan passed the significance threshold. We found no significant association from the gene-level collapsing analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

We have identified a candidate genetic variant potentially predictive of the progression of heart failure in patients with preserved ejection fraction. The findings require further replication, and we cannot exclude the possibility that the results may be chance findings.

AT1-receptor blockade attenuates outward aortic remodeling associated with diet-induced obesity in mice

The renin-angiotensin system (RAS) and obesity have been implicated in vascular outward remodeling, including aneurysms, but the precise mechanisms are not yet understood. We investigated the effect of the angiotensin receptor type 1 (AT1-receptor) antagonist telmisartan on aortic outward remodeling in a diet-induced obesity model in mice. C57/Black6J mice were fed either a low-fat diet (LFD) or a high-fat diet (HFD) for 14 weeks. One group of HFD mice was additionally exposed to telmisartan (3 mg/kg per day) for the last 4 weeks. HFD led to aortic outward remodeling, characterized by increased proteolysis, along with structural changes, such as fragmentation of elastic fibers and decreased elastin content. Vascular damage was associated with up-regulation of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-2 (MMP-2), MMP-3, MMP-12, cathepsin D, and cathepsin B. HFD aortae exhibited an enhanced inflammatory status, characterized by tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) and interleukin-1β (IL-1β) colocalized with adipocytes in the adventitia. HFD resulted in a significant increase in aortic dimensions, evident by ultrasound measurements. Telmisartan abolished aortic dilatation and preserved elastin content. HFD induced enhanced expression of aortic MMP-2, MMP-9, and TNF-α was abrogated by telmisartan. Adventitial proteolytic and inflammatory factors were also examined in samples from human abdominal aneurysms. The expression of TNF-α, IL-1β, and MMP-9 was higher in the adventitial fat of diseased vessels compared with healthy tissues. Finally, adipocytes treated with TNF-α showed enhanced MMP-2, MMP-3, and cathepsin D, which was prevented by telmisartan. Taken together, HFD in mice induced aortic dilatation with up-regulation of matrix degrading and inflammatory pathways similar to those seen in human aortic aneurysmatic tissue. The HFD-induced vascular pathology was reduced by AT1-receptor antagonist telmisartan.

Evaluation of a Pharmacokinetic Interaction between Telmisartan and Chlorthalidone in Healthy Male Adult Subjects

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Combination therapy is recommended for the effective management of hypertension according to most treatment guidelines, including those of the US Joint National Committee. Therefore, pharmacokinetic drug interactions are an important issue in combination therapy for hypertension. In this study, the pharmacokinetic properties of telmisartan and chlorthalidone were evaluated to investigate their pharmacokinetic interactions in healthy subjects.

METHODS

Two separate, randomized, multiple-dose, two-period, one-sequence studies were conducted. In study A, 43 participants received 80 mg of telmisartan orally for 7 days, and were then administered oral chlorthalidone 25 mg for 14 days (days 8-21), coadministered with 80 mg of telmisartan from day 15. In study B, 14 participants received oral chlorthalidone (25 mg) for 13 days, followed by coadministration with 80 mg of telmisartan orally for 7 days.

RESULTS

The geometric mean ratios (GMRs) (90 % confidence intervals [CIs]) of the maximum plasma concentration (C max,ss) and area under the concentration-time curve for the dosing interval at steady state (AUCτ,ss) of telmisartan (with and without chlorthalidone) were 1.018 (0.861-1.203) and 1.099 (1.015-1.190), respectively. For chlorthalidone (with/without telmisartan), the GMRs (90 % CIs) for C max,ss and AUCτ,ss were 0.996 (0.922-1.075) and 0.992 (0.925-1.064), respectively. The GMRs and 90 % CIs for telmisartan and chlorthalidone were all within the 0.80-1.25 range.

CONCLUSION

Thus, in this study, there was no significant pharmacokinetic interaction between telmisartan and chlorthalidone. CLINICALTRIAL.

GOV IDENTIFIER

NCT01806363.

Telmisartan/hydrochlorothiazide: a new fixed dose combination

Many patients with hypertension require two or more antihypertensive drugs with complementary mechanisms of action to lower their blood pressure and attain the therapeutic goals specified in internationally accepted guidelines. Yet, these latter guidelines offer the choice of fixed dose combinations as possible first-step therapies. The angiotensin II type 1-receptor antagonist telmisartan and the diuretic hydrochlorothiazide are two antihypertensive agents that have a well-recognized clinical efficacy. Their combination was shown in randomized, controlled trials to be more effective than each agent alone in lowering blood pressure, due to a dual and synergistic mechanism. Indeed, combining telmisartan with hydrochlorothiazide enhances the antihypertensive efficacy of telmisartan in almost two-thirds of hypertensive patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension. The pharmacokinetics and -dynamics of the combination are similar to monotherapy, and the addition of hydrochlorothiazide to telmisartan does not modify the excellent tolerability profile of the drug.

Pharmacokinetics of Oral Doses of Telmisartan and Nisoldipine, Given Alone and in Combination, in Patients With Essential Hypertension

This randomized, single-blind, parallel-group study was performed to assess pharmacokinetic interactions potentially occurring during concomitant use of telmisartan and nisoldipine. Patients with essential hypertension (n = 37) were treated with once-daily doses of telmisartan, nisoldipine, or their combination for 6 weeks. The regimen was started at low dose with an increase of dosage after 3 weeks of treatment. AUC(ss) (132%; P < .01) of telmisartan applied in doses of 80 mg was significantly higher after concomitant application with nisoldipine (10 mg), whereas CL/f(ss) (-54%; P < .05) and Vz/f(ss) (-72%; P < .05) were significantly lower. Regarding pharmacokinetic parameters of nisoldipine, significant differences between treatment groups were not detected. In conclusion, the results of this study strongly suggest that concomitant treatment with nisoldipine enhances telmisartan bioavailability in hypertensive individuals. Larger crossover trials will have to establish these observations and investigate whether interaction of both drugs affects telmisartan efficacy and tolerability in clinical use.

Indications for and utilization of angiotensin receptor II blockers in patients at high cardiovascular risk

The worldwide burden of cardiovascular disease is growing. In addition to lifestyle changes, pharmacologic agents that can modify cardiovascular disease processes have the potential to reduce cardiovascular events. Antihypertensive agents are widely used to reduce the risk of cardiovascular events partly beyond that of blood pressure-lowering. In particular, the angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), which antagonize the vasoconstrictive and proinflammatory/pro-proliferative effects of angiotensin II, have been shown to be cardio vascularly protective and well tolerated. Although the eight currently available ARBs are all indicated for the treatment of hypertension, they have partly different pharmacology, and their pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties differ. ARB trials for reduction of cardiovascular risk can be broadly categorized into those in patients with/without hypertension and additional risk factors, in patients with evidence of cardiovascular disease, and in patients with severe cardiovascular disease, such as heart failure. These differences have led to their indications in different populations. For hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy, losartan was approved to have an indication for stroke prevention, while for most patients at high-risk for cardiovascular events, telmisartan is an appropriate therapy because it has a cardiovascular preventive indication. Other ARBs are indicated for narrowly defined high-risk patients, such as those with hypertension or heart failure. Although in one analysis a possible link between ARBs and increased risks of cancer has surfaced, several meta-analyses, using the most comprehensive data available, have found no link between any ARB, or the class as a whole, and cancer. Most recently, the US Food and Drug Administration completed a review of the potential risk of cancer and concluded that treatment with an ARB medication does not increase the risk of developing cancer. This review discusses the clinical evidence supporting the different indications for each of the ARBs and the outstanding safety of this drug class.

Angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists in the treatment of hypertension in elderly patients: focus on patient outcomes

Hypertension in the elderly is one of the main risk factors of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases. Knowledge regarding the mechanisms of hypertension and specific considerations in managing hypertensive elderly through pharmacological intervention(s) is fundamental to improving clinical outcomes. Recent clinical studies in the elderly have provided evidence that angiotensin II type 1 (AT(1)) receptor antagonists can improve clinical outcomes to a similar or, in certain populations, an even greater extent than other classical arterial blood pressure-lowering agents. This newer class of antihypertensive agents presents several benefits, including potential for improved adherence, excellent tolerability profile with minimal first-dose hypotension, and a low incidence of adverse effects. Thus, AT(1) receptor antagonists represent an appropriate option for many elderly patients with hypertension, type 2 diabetes, heart failure, and/or left ventricular dysfunction.

Telmisartan: a review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

Telmisartan belongs to the angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor antagonizing class of antihypertensives, which are widely recognized and increasingly prescribed because of their good tolerability. Moreover, due to the results of the ONTARGET trial program, telmisartan was the first AT1 receptor antagonist to receive approval for the prevention of cardiovascular events in cardiovascular high risk patients, thereby, indicating that its clinical importance will further increase.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

This article reviews the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of telmisartan with a special focus on novel pharmacokinetic characteristics of the drug.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

An overview of the published data regarding the pharmacokinetic properties of telmisartan as well as a summary of the results from selected small exploratory and large clinical outcome trials involving telmisartan.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Telmisartan is a safe and effective alternative for the treatment of hypertension. Moreover, due to its good tolerability, an increasing use of telmisartan in cardiovascular high risk patients can be anticipated. This will grant further experimental and clinical research on AT1 receptor-independent pharmacodynamics of telmisartan as well as on telmisartan-related drug safety issues.

Management of hypertension in patients with diabetes: the place of angiotensin-II receptor blockers

Hypertension is an important cardiovascular (CV) risk factor in patients with diabetes mellitus. In this setting, tight control of blood pressure (BP) significantly reduces CV morbidity and mortality. In the UK Prospective Diabetes Study, a 10 mmHg reduction in systolic blood pressure (SBP) was superior to a 0.7% decrease in glycosylated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) as far as reducing morbidity and mortality was concerned. In the Hypertension Optimal Treatment study, the risk of CV events decreased by 51% among patients with type 2 diabetes randomized to the lower BP level. Based on these findings, contemporary treatment guidelines recommend a target SBP/diastolic blood pressure of <130/80 mmHg for patients with diabetes.

Prescribing trends and drug budget impact of the ARBs in the UK

OBJECTIVES

Angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) were introduced into the UK antihypertensive drug market at a premium price relative to other antihypertensives during a period of evolving evidence about hypertension treatment. This study aimed to determine the UK antihypertensive drug budget impact as the first ARB market launched in December 1994 and what proportion of the increase was directly attributable to ARBs.

METHODS

Prescriptions for oral antihypertensives were identified from The Health Improvement Network database. Drug prices were based on the Chemist & Druggist January 2005 pricelist estimating real expenditure growth. Expenditure increases were disaggregated into the number of patients receiving antihypertensive drug prescriptions, the number of antihypertensive prescriptions per patient treated, and the average drug expenditure per antihypertensive prescription.

RESULTS

The annual ARB prescription frequency increased from 0.04% in 1995 to 6.57% in 2004. Expenditure for antihypertensive drugs was estimated at pound465,862,416 in 1995 and pound1,458,268,104 in 2004 (2005 values), reflecting a 213% real rate of increase. Use of ARBs accounted for only 9.3% (range: 5.8%-12.5%) of the average drug expenditure. Treatment prevalence rose from 11.30% in 1995 to 16.90% in 2004, while the average number of antihypertensive drug prescriptions per patient increased from 9.34 to 13.46 per year. The average expenditure per antihypertensive drug prescription increased over time reflecting a product shift toward more expensive therapies.

CONCLUSIONS

ARBs accounted for only 9.3% of the 213% increase in antihypertensive drug expenditure after their introduction. A substantial portion of the impact reflected increases in treatment prevalence and in the number of prescriptions per patient.

Adverse drug reactions in patients with cardiovascular disease

Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) occur frequently in modern medical practice, increasing morbidity and mortality and inflating the cost of care. Patients with cardiovascular disease are particularly vulnerable to ADRs due to their advanced age, polypharmacy, and the influence of heart disease on drug metabolism. The ADR potential for a particular cardiovascular drug varies with the individual, the disease being treated, and the extent of exposure to other drugs. Knowledge of this complex interplay between patient, drug, and disease is a critical component of safe and effective cardiovascular disease management. The majority of significant ADRs involving cardiovascular drugs are predictable and therefore preventable. Better patient education, avoidance of polypharmacy, and clear communication between physicians, pharmacists, and patients, particularly during the transition between the inpatient to outpatient settings, can substantially reduce ADR risk.

Inhibitory Effects of Angiotensin Receptor Blockers on CYP2C9 Activity in Human Liver Microsomes

We investigated the inhibitory effects of the angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), candesartan, irbesartan, losartan, losartan active metabolite (EXP-3174), olmesartan, telmisartan and valsartan (0.3-300 microM), on the CYP2C9 activity in human liver microsomes using (S)-(-)-warfarin as a typical CYP2C9 substrate. Except for olmesartan and valsartan, these ARBs inhibited the activity of 7-hydroxylation of (S)-(-)-warfarin with IC50 values of 39.5-116 microM. Of six synthetic derivatives of olmesartan, five compounds which possess either alkyl groups or a chloro group at the same position as that of the hydroxyisopropyl group in olmesartan inhibited CYP2C9 activity with IC50 values of 21.7-161 microM. Olmesartan and the olmesartan analogue, RNH-6272, both having a hydroxyisopropyl group, showed no inhibition, indicating that the hydrophilicity of this group greatly contributes to the lack of CYP2C9 inhibition by these two compounds. A three-dimensional model for docking between EXP-3174 and CYP2C9 indicated that the chloro group of EXP-3174 is oriented to a hydrophobic pocket in the CYP2C9 active site, indicating that the lipophilicity of the group present in ARBs at the position corresponding to that of the hydroxyisopropyl group in olmesartan is important in inhibiting CYP2C9 activity.

Telmisartan/hydrochlorothiazide in the treatment of hypertension

Telmisartan blocks the detrimental actions of angiotensin II mediated via the angiotensin type 1 receptor. Unique features of telmisartan are high lipophilicity and a long terminal elimination half-life (~ 24 h). Telmisartan/hydrochlorothiazide is indicated for hypertensive patients unable to achieve target blood pressure with either monotherapy. Fixed-dose combination tablets containing telmisartan 40 or 80 mg and hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg are widely available; in addition, telmisartan/hydrochlorothiazide 80/25 mg is available in the USA. Telmisartan/hydrochlorothiazide is superior to losartan/hydrochlorothiazide and valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide in maintaining blood pressure control in the risky early morning hours at the end of the dosing interval. Furthermore, telmisartan/ hydrochlorothiazide provides superior 24-h mean blood pressure reduction and is better tolerated than amlodipine/hydrochlorothiazide in elderly patients with predominantly systolic hypertension. Telmisartan has the potential to confer additional reno- and cardioprotection to that due to blood pressure control. The cardioprotective activity of renin–angiotensin system blockade with telmisartan alone and in combination with ramipril is currently being evaluated in the ONgoing Telmisartan Alone and in combination with Ramipril Global Endpoint Trial (ONTARGET) and the Telmisartan Randomized AssessmeNt Study in aCE iNtolerant subjects with cardiovascular Disease (TRANSCEND). In total, 31,546 patients have been enrolled worldwide and are being followed for up to 5.5 years.

[Antihypertensive drug-drug interactions]

A drug interaction is the quantitative or qualitative modification of the effect of a drug by the simultaneous or successive administration of a different one. Hypertensive patients, mainly the more elderly ones, frequently present concomitant diseases that require the administration of several medicines which facilitates the appearance of interactions. The lack of effectiveness of the antihypertensive treatment is a relatively frequent fact that sometimes is due to interactions of antihypertensive drugs with other treatments. It is difficult to determine the incidence of interactions, but it is related to the number of drugs administered simultaneously. Between 37 and 60% of hospital-admissions are treated with potentially dangerous drug associations and up to a 6% of fatal events are due to this circumstance. Among antihypertensive drugs, diuretics and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors are less affected by drug-interactions. Lipophilic beta-blockers agents may present some clinical relevant interactions, whereas calcium channel blockers, especially the non-dihydropiridinic ones, are implied in clinically relevant pharmacokinetic interactions. Among the angiotensin receptor blockers there are differences that would have to be considered when they are used in patients who receive other drugs. Although it is impossible for the doctor to remember all the clinical relevant interactions, it is important to bear in mind their existence and the possible mechanisms of production which can help to identify them and to contribute to their prevention. The most frequent interactions related with clinical problems are the pharmacokinetic ones, mainly those related to the metabolism through the cytochrome P450 system or the presystemic clearance by means of the P-glycoprotein. Enzymes of the cytochrome P450 system may present polymorphisms that can explain the individual differences in the response to drugs or the appearance of drug-interactions.

Drug interactions with angiotensin receptor blockers

Many patients with high blood pressure receive multiple medications for hypertension and other conditions, placing them at risk for adverse drug interactions. Additionally, as the prevalence of hypertension increases with age, factors like greater frailty, comorbidity of the elderly requiring polypharmacy, and reduced hepatic and renal clearance rates for the elimination of drugs increase the likelihood of drug interactions. Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are the most recent class of agents for the treatment of hypertension. Due to a favourable side effect profile, this class of drugs deserves increased attention. This article reviews drug interactions of ARBs and suggests measures for reducing the risk of adverse events when drugs are co-administered. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane library, and CINAHL were searched. Reported and likely clinical relevant interactions of ARBs with concomitantly given drugs are summarised in Table 2 and 3. Compared to other classes of antihypertensive agents, the ARBs appear to have a low potential for drug interactions; however, interactions with this class occur and variations within the class have been detected, mainly due to different affinities for cytochrome P450 isoenzymes.

Verapamil Toxicity Resulting from a Probable Interaction with Telithromycin

OBJECTIVE:

To report a case of hypotension and bradyarrhythmia caused by verapamil toxicity in a patient prescribed telithromycin.

CASE SUMMARY:

A 76-year-old white woman receiving verapamil 180 mg/day for hypertension experienced a sudden onset of shortness of breath and weakness and was found to be profoundly hypotensive and bradycardic, with a systolic blood pressure of 50–60 mm Hg and a heart rate of 30 beats/min. She had been taking telithromycin 800 mg/day for 2 days previously for acute sinusitis. The patient was treated with crystalloids, vasopressors, and transvenous pacing. Approximately 72 hours after admission, her blood pressure and heart rate rapidly returned to normal, and she was discharged several days later.

DISCUSSION:

Telithromycin is a known substrate of the CYP3A4 system, and several pharmacokinetic interactions can occur by displacement of other drugs from this system. Verapamil is metabolized through several cytochrome P450 isoenzyme systems. Although there are no previous reports of an interaction between these drugs, other possible causes for the patient's symptoms were excluded and the diagnosis of a probable interaction between verapamil and telithromycin leading to verapamil toxicity was made.

CONCLUSIONS:

Telithromycin is a ketolide antibiotic approved for treatment of respiratory tract infections and acute sinusitis. The potential for clinically significant drug interactions should be considered before using this agent, especially in patients taking other drugs that are metabolized through the CYP3A system. Caution should be exercised when considering the use of this antibiotic in patients receiving verapamil.

Angiotensin II receptor antagonists alone and combined with hydrochlorothiazide: potential benefits beyond the antihypertensive effect

Angiotensin II receptor antagonists (angiotensin receptor blockers; ARBs) and thiazide diuretics have an accepted place in the management of hypertension. Most patients require combination therapy with two or more drugs to adequately control blood pressure to targets recommended by European and international guidelines. ARBs and the thiazide diuretic hydrochlorothiazide have complementary modes of action. Fixed-dose combinations of an ARB and low-dose hydrochlorothiazide provide a convenient and effective treatment option for patients who do not achieve blood pressure targets on monotherapy, without compromising the placebo-like tolerability of ARBs. In Europe, fixed-dose combinations with hydrochlorothiazide currently are available for the ARBs candesartan, eprosartan, irbesartan, losartan, telmisartan, and valsartan. Recently, a number of studies have focused on the use of ARBs in monotherapy and in combination therapy, in conditions including congestive heart failure, post-myocardial infarction management, hypertension with cardiovascular risk factors, and diabetic and non-diabetic nephropathy. Evidence from these studies suggests a beneficial role beyond the antihypertensive effect of these therapies in providing protection against cardiovascular, renovascular, and cerebrovascular events.

Neuroprotection with angiotensin receptor antagonists: a review of the evidence and potential mechanisms

The peptide hormone angiotensin (A)-II, the major effector peptide of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS), is well established to play a pivotal role in the systemic regulation of blood pressure, fluid, and electrolyte homeostasis. Recent biochemical and neurophysiologic studies have documented local intrinsic angiotensin-generating systems in organs and tissues such as the brain, retina, bone marrow, liver, and pancreas. The locally generated angiotensin peptides have multiple and novel actions including stimulating cell growth and anti-proliferative and/or antiapoptotic actions. In the mammalian brain, all components of the RAS are present including angiotensin receptor subtypes 1 (AT(1)) and 2 (AT(2)). A-II exerts most of its well defined physiologic and pathophysiologic actions, including those on the central and peripheral nervous system, through its AT(1) receptor subtype. While the AT(1) receptor is responsible for the classical effects of A-II, it has been found that the AT(2) receptor is linked to totally different signalling mechanisms and this has revealed hitherto unknown functions of A-II. AT(2) receptors are expressed at low density in many healthy adult tissues, but are upregulated in a variety of human diseases. This receptor not only contributes to stroke-related pathologic mechanisms (e.g. hypertension, atherothrombosis, and cardiac hypertrophy) but may also be involved in post-ischemic damage to the brain. It has been reported that the AT(2) receptor regulates several functions of nerve cells, e.g. ionic fluxes, cell differentiation, and neuronal tissue regeneration, and also modulates programmed cell death. In this article, we review the experimental evidence supporting the notion that blockade of brain AT(1) receptors can be beneficial with respect to stroke incidence and outcome. We further delineate how AT(2) receptors could be involved in neuronal regeneration following brain injury such as stroke or CNS trauma. The current review is focussed on some of the new functions arising from the locally formed A-II with particular attention to its emerging neuroprotective role in the brain.