Pamidronate. A review of its use in the management of osteolytic bone metastases, tumour-induced hypercalcaemia and Paget's disease of bone

Management of Ankle Charcot Neuroarthropathy: A Systematic Review

Background: Charcot neuroarthropathy is a non-infective, destructive process occurring in patients rendered insensate by peripheral neuropathy, which is caused mainly by diabetes. Repetitive trauma from standing and walking provides a neuro-traumatic stimulus that leads to dislocation, or peri-articular fracture, or both, within the ankle. This review concentrates on the management protocols regarding the ankle only. Methods: A Pubmed search for clinical trials performed to manage ankle Charcot neuroarthropathy and a systematic review of these articles were undertaken. Results: Twenty papers met the inclusion criteria: four of them describe non-surgical management, while the rest show different surgical management options of ankle Charcot neuroarthropathy. Conclusions: Surgical algorithms for the treatment of CN of the ankle are based almost entirely on level four. There is inconclusive evidence concerning the timing of treatment and the use of different fixation methods. Instability and ulceration are the main precursors for surgical interventions. Prospective series and randomized studies, albeit difficult to perform, are necessary to support and strengthen current practice.

A Mechanistic Study on the Formation of Dronic Acids

Dronic acid derivatives, important drugs against bone diseases, may be synthesized from the corresponding substituted acetic acid either by reaction with phosphorus trichloride in methanesulfonic acid as the solvent or by using also phosphorous acid as the P-reactant if sulfolane is applied as the medium. The energetics of the two protocols were evaluated by high-level quantum chemical calculations on the formation of fenidronic acid and benzidronic acid. The second option, involving (HO)₂P-O-PCl₂ as the nucleophile, was found to be more favorable over the first variation, comprising Cl₂P-O-SO₂Me as the real reagent, especially for the case of benzidronate.

Principles of Management of Spine Metastasis

BACKGROUND

With evolution of medicine, radiation therapy and surgical methods, cancer care has improved the quality of life for patients with improved survival and functional status in patients with skeletal metastasis. The most common site of skeletal metastases from other primary malignant neoplasms is the spine, hence, understanding the epidemiology of metastatic spine disease and its presentation is essential for developing a diagnostic and treatment strategy which eventually results in optimum care to reduce disease-related morbidity.

PURPOSE

With this review article we intend to describe an evidence-based review on the presentation, diagnosis and treatment of metastatic spinal disease.

METHODS

We reviewed the current available literature on management of spinal metastasis and have described a step wise evaluation and management strategy of metastatic spine disease.

CONCLUSION

The present review article addresses various aspects and related controversies related to evaluation, staging and treatment options in the management of spinal metastasis.

Bisphosphonates in Oncology: Physiopathologic Bases and Clinical Activity

Osteoclastic activation is the ultimate way of bone resorption in neoplasia, induced by the combined effects of tumor-secreted humoral factors (especially parathyroid hormone-related peptides) and osteoclastic-osteoblastic interaction. Bisphosphonates inhibit the osteoclast activity and reduce bone resorption and are a valuable supportive measure for bone disease of neoplasms. Experimental models also suggest an activity of bisphosphonates against cancer cells. Controlled studies, especially in advanced breast cancer and multiple myeloma, indicate different effectiveness against the distinct skeletal-related events. Intravenous clodronate and, especially, pamidronate and zoledronate are the first-choice drugs for hypercalcemia, and they play a significant role in reducing metastatic bone pain. Their prolonged use delays, without hampering, the progression of bone disease, including the appearance of osteolysis and the occurrence of pathologic fractures. This effect is probably more valuable when bisphosphonates are administered early in the course of the disease. The evidence that adjuvant bisphosphonates improve survival needs to be confirmed in ongoing studies. Although poorly absorbed by the gastrointestinal tract, oral bisphosphonates are effective in preventing and treating cancer-induced osteoporosis in long-living patients with operable breast cancer. At present, there is little hope that newer bisphosphonates are more effective than those currently used.

Extravasation reactions associated with the administration of pamidronate: 11 cases (2008-2013)

Pamidronate is a bisphosphonate drug widely utilized in veterinary oncologic practice for the palliation of malignant osteolysis. Pamidronate has not been previously reported to cause tissue injury upon extravasation in dogs. The medical records of 11 client-owned dogs undergoing palliative treatment for primary bone tumors with known or suspected pamidronate extravasation reactions were reviewed. The majority of adverse events were low grade in nature, however in some cases, the reactions were severe and led to euthanasia in one instance. Time to complete resolution of lesions ranged from within several days to greater than one and a half months. Aside from the dog that was euthanized, no long-term sequelae of extravasation were identified. Treatments employed to address the reactions varied widely. Pamidronate extravasation reaction appears to be an uncommon, but potentially serious complication of intravenous administration.

Do measurements of inflammatory mediators in blood predict recurrence in patients with bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaws?

Bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaws (BRONJ) is well-recognised, difficult to manage, and often recurs. The aim of this study was to examine the value of preoperative measurements of inflammatory mediators in blood in 212 patients with BRONJ who were studied prospectively. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to assess the importance of the amounts of substances in the blood that are independently associated with the dependent variable "recurrence of BRONJ". The only factor that significantly influenced the development of recurrent BRONJ was reduction in the white cell count (p<0.0001; hazard ratio 5.324; 95% CI 2.373 to 11.945). Neither white cell counts nor C-reactive protein concentrations within or above the reference ranges were significantly associated with recurrent BRONJ. Patients whose white cell counts were lower than the reference range were at increased risk of recurrent BRONJ. This may be a marker of reduced immunocompetence, and additional prophylactic measures or treatment should be considered for these patients.

Zoledronate inhibits ischemia-induced neovascularization by impairing the mobilization and function of endothelial progenitor cells

Background

Bisphosphonates are a class of pharmacologic compounds that are commonly used to treat postmenopausal osteoporosis and malignant osteolytic processes. Studies have shown that bone marrow-derived endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) play a significant role in postnatal neovascularization. Whether the nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate zoledronate inhibits ischemia-induced neovascularization by modulating EPC functions remains unclear.

Methodology/Principal Findings

Unilateral hindlimb ischemia was surgically induced in wild-type mice after 2 weeks of treatment with vehicle or zoledronate (low-dose: 30 μg/kg; high-dose: 100 μg/kg). Doppler perfusion imaging demonstrated that the ischemic limb/normal side blood perfusion ratio was significantly lower in wild-type mice treated with low-dose zoledronate and in mice treated with high-dose zoledronate than in controls 4 weeks after ischemic surgery (control vs. low-dose vs. high-dose: 87±7% vs. *61±18% vs. **49±17%, *p<0.01, **p<0.005 compared to control). Capillary densities were also significantly lower in mice treated with low-dose zoledronate and in mice treated with high-dose zoledronate than in control mice. Flow cytometry analysis showed impaired mobilization of EPC-like cells (Sca-1⁺/Flk-1⁺) after surgical induction of ischemia in mice treated with zoledronate but normal levels of mobilization in mice treated with vehicle. In addition, ischemic tissue from mice that received zoledronate treatment exhibited significantly lower levels of the active form of MMP-9, lower levels of VEGF, and lower levels of phosphorylated eNOS and phosphorylated Akt than ischemic tissue from mice that received vehicle. Results of the in vitro studies showed that incubation with zoledronate inhibited the viability, migration, and tube-forming capacities of EPC.

Conclusions/Significance

Zoledronate inhibited ischemia-induced neovascularization by impairing EPC mobilization and angiogenic functions. These findings suggest that administration of zoledronate should be withheld in patients with ischemic events such as acute limb ischemia.

Zoledronate and pamidronate depress neutrophil functions and survival in mice

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ) has been identified as a severe complication of patients previously treated with i.v. bisphosphonates. It has been noted that necrotic bone from BRONJ sites display signs of bacterial infection suggesting that an immune defect may play a role in the pathophysiology of BRONJ. Here, we have examined the effect of two potent bisphosphonates, zoledronate and pamidronate, on neutrophil function, differentiation and survival.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

The effect of bisphosphonates on chemotaxis, NADPH oxidase activity and neutrophil survival were assessed in vitro using bone marrow-derived primary neutrophils or in vitro differentiated haematopoetic progenitors from mice. The same parameters and the number of circulating neutrophils were quantified in neutrophils isolated from mice treated in vivo with zoledronate. In vivo recruitment of neutrophils was assessed by sodium periodate-induced peritonitis.

KEY RESULTS

Zoledronate and pamidronate inhibited in vitro neutrophil chemotaxis and NADPH oxidase activity in a dose-dependent manner. In vivo recruitment of neutrophils was also suppressed. Zoledronate did not affect in vitro differentiation of neutrophils but shortened their life span in a granulocyte-colony stimulating factor-dependent manner. fMLP-induced activation of RhoA activity was decreased by zoledronate treatment.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Our results show that bisphosphonate exposure leads to impaired neutrophil chemotaxis, neutrophil NADPH oxidase activity and reduced circulating neutrophil counts. This work suggests that bisphosphonates have the potential to depress the innate immune system for a prolonged time, possibly contributing to the pathogenesis of BRONJ.

Short-term effects of zoledronate on the histomorphology of osteoclast in young albino rats

The present study was conducted to histomorphometrically evaluate the effects of short-term administration of zoledronate, a third generation bisphosphonate, on the metaphysis of the proximal end of tibia in twenty day old male albino rats. Zoledronate (2.8 μg/kg body weight), was daily given subcutaneously for eleven days. The animals were sacrificed; tibiae were dissected out and decalcified in EDTA. Seven micron thick, serial longitudinal paraffin sections were stained with haematoxylin and eosin and examined under a Zeiss light microscope and Image Pro-Express Analyzer. In zoledronate treated rats, a significant increase (p<0.05) in the number of osteoclasts was observed both in the regions of primary spongiosa (zoledronate treated: 6.41 ± 0.30/mm(2), control: 2.90 ± 0.28/mm(2)) and secondary spongiosa (zoledronate treated: 49.58 ± 0.84/mm(2), control: 31.81 ± 2.02/mm(2)) along with a significant increase (p<0.05) in the length of the metaphyseal region as compared to the control group. The number of nuclei per osteoclast and area of the osteoclast also showed a significant increase (p<0.001; p<0.05 respectively) following the uptake of zoledronate. The findings in the present study, suggest that the osteoclasts are the primary sites of action of zoledronate resulting in decreased osteoclastic activity, which would account for the great increase in the number and size of inactive osteoclasts resulting in marked cancellous bone formation.

Effects of intravenous pamidronate on renal function, bone mineral metabolism and bone mass in patients with severe osteoporosis

INTRODUCTION

To analyze the effects of intravenous pamidronate (APD) on bone remodelling, bone mineral density (BMD), fractures and bone mineral metabolism parameters, and the rate of adverse events, with special attention to renal function, in patients with osteoporosis with intolerance and/or any contraindication to oral bisphosphonates.

METHODS

We analyzed prospectively 17 osteoporotic patients (age, 66.8 +/- 9.4 years): 65% women, 82% with prevalent vertebral fractures. All patients received APD therapy (30 mg intravenously every 3 months) and were followed up for 1 year. We analyzed serum amino-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen and urinary N-terminal cross-linked telopeptide of type I collagen (as markers of bone turnover), serum calcium, phosphate, parathormone, 25OH-vitamin D, creatinine, and the creatinine clearance: at baseline, 1 week after starting APD treatment, and thereafter for every 3 months (before infusion) during 1 year. We also analyzed lumbar and femoral BMD at baseline and after 1 year, the incidence of new fractures, and the treatment-related adverse events.

RESULTS

One week after starting APD treatment, a significant decrease of N-terminal cross-linked telopeptide of type I collagen (32%) (P < 0.05) and an increase of parathormone values (72%) (P < 0.01) were observed, without significant differences found thereafter. No significant differences were observed in BMD evolution and in the other parameters analyzed throughout the study, nor in impairment of renal function. Sixty-four percent of patients suffered new skeletal fractures, 41% of patients showed flu-like syndrome after APD infusion, and 1 patient was withdrawn from treatment because of adverse events.

CONCLUSION

Patients with severe osteoporosis receiving APD infusions had a high rate of fractures without significant changes in bone mass or in bone markers; nevertheless, such a therapeutic regimen showed a good renal safety profile, suggesting that APD at this dosage is safe but ineffective for treating severe osteoporosis.

American Society of Clinical Oncology 2007 clinical practice guideline update on the role of bisphosphonates in multiple myeloma

PURPOSE

To update the recommendations for the use of bisphosphonates in the prevention and treatment of bone disease in multiple myeloma. The Update Committee expanded the guideline to include a discussion of osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ).

METHODS

For the 2007 update, an Update Committee composed of members from the full panel completed a review and analysis of data published since 2002. Searches of Medline and the Cochrane Collaboration Library databases were performed.

RECOMMENDATIONS

For multiple myeloma patients who have, on plain radiograph(s) or imaging studies, lytic destruction of bone or spine compression fracture from osteopenia, intravenous pamidronate 90 mg delivered over at least 2 hours or zoledronic acid 4 mg delivered over at least 15 minutes every 3 to 4 weeks is recommended. Clodronate is an alternative bisphosphonate approved worldwide, except in the United States, for oral or intravenous administration. New dosing guidelines for patients with pre-existing renal impairment were added to the zoledronic acid package insert. Although no similar dosing guidelines are available for pamidronate, the Update Committee recommends that clinicians consider reducing the initial pamidronate dose in patients with pre-existing renal impairment. Zoledronic acid has not been studied in patients with severe renal impairment and is not recommended in this setting. The Update Committee suggests that bisphosphonate treatment continue for a period of 2 years. At 2 years, physicians should seriously consider discontinuing bisphosphonates in patients with responsive or stable disease, but further use is at the discretion of the treating physician. The Update Committee also discusses measures regarding ONJ.

Bisphosphonates: mode of action and pharmacology

The profound effects of the bisphosphonates on calcium metabolism were discovered over 30 years ago, and they are now well established as the major drugs used for the treatment of bone diseases associated with excessive resorption. Their principal uses are for Paget disease of bone, myeloma, bone metastases, and osteoporosis in adults, but there has been increasing and successful application in pediatric bone diseases, notably osteogenesis imperfecta. Bisphosphonates are structural analogues of inorganic pyrophosphate but are resistant to enzymatic and chemical breakdown. Bisphosphonates inhibit bone resorption by selective adsorption to mineral surfaces and subsequent internalization by bone-resorbing osteoclasts where they interfere with various biochemical processes. The simpler, non-nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates (eg, clodronate and etidronate) can be metabolically incorporated into nonhydrolysable analogues of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) that may inhibit ATP-dependent intracellular enzymes. In contrast, the more potent, nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates (eg, pamidronate, alendronate, risedronate, ibandronate, and zoledronate) inhibit a key enzyme, farnesyl pyrophosphate synthase, in the mevalonate pathway, thereby preventing the biosynthesis of isoprenoid compounds that are essential for the posttranslational modification of small guanosine triphosphate (GTP)-binding proteins (which are also GTPases) such as Rab, Rho, and Rac. The inhibition of protein prenylation and the disruption of the function of these key regulatory proteins explains the loss of osteoclast activity. The recently elucidated crystal structure of farnesyl diphosphate reveals how bisphosphonates bind to and inhibit at the active site via their critical nitrogen atoms. Although bisphosphonates are now established as an important class of drugs for the treatment of many bone diseases, there is new knowledge about how they work and the subtle but potentially important differences that exist between individual bisphosphonates. Understanding these may help to explain differences in potency, onset and duration of action, and clinical effectiveness.

Lymphopenia-induced proliferation of donor T cells reduces their capacity for causing acute graft-versus-host disease

OBJECTIVE

T cells that undergo lymphopenia-induced proliferation (LIP) are characterized by greater effector and anti-tumor function than naïve T cells. But the ability of these T cells in causing graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is not known.

METHODS

We tested the hypothesis that donor T cells that had undergone LIP would cause more severe GVHD than naïve T cells by utilizing well-characterized murine experimental models of allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT).

RESULTS

Contrary to our hypothesis, LIP of donor T cells under either noninflammatory or irradiated conditions caused significantly reduced GVHD as determined by survival, clinical, pathologic, and biochemical parameters than naïve T cells. Compared to naïve donor T cells, LIP T cells demonstrated reduced expansion in vivo and in vitro after allogeneic BMT. The reduction in GVHD mortality and severity was observed across multiple strains after allogeneic BMT. In vivo mechanistic studies by cell depletion demonstrated an increase in the CD44(hi) "memory" phenotype T cells and not the CD4(+)CD25(+) T cell subset to be critical for the reduction in GVHD.

CONCLUSIONS

These data demonstrate that LIP of T cells regulates acute GVHD severity in contrast to their ability to cause increased allograft rejection, autoimmunity, or anti-tumor immunity.

Jaw avascular osteonecrosis after treatment of multiple myeloma with zoledronate

PURPOSE

Multiple myeloma, the second most common haematopoietic cancer, which represents the collection of plasma-cell neoplasms that invariably becomes fatal when self-renewing myeloma cells begin unrestrained proliferation. The major clinical manifestation of multiple myeloma is related to the loss of bone through osteolysis. This can lead to pathologic fractures, spinal cord compression, hypercalcaemia, and pain. It is also a major cause of morbidity and mortality in these patients, who frequently require radiation therapy, surgery and analgesic medications. Bisphosphonates are specific inhibitors of osteoclastic activity, and are currently used to prevent bone complications and to treat malignant hypercalcaemia in patients with multiple myeloma, or bone metastases from breast and prostate cancers. Hence, osteonecrosis of the mandible has been reported in three patients from Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia (CHVNG) with multiple myeloma treated for over 18-48 months with intravenous zoledronate, commonly prescribed for multiple myeloma therapy. Although, this report alerts clinicians about the potential complication of bone necrosis in patients receiving bisphosphonate therapy, many questions remain concerning the underlying pathogenesis of this process.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The medical and dental records of three patients with multiple myeloma, who were treated in CHVNG in the past 4 years, were reviewed. These three patients presented exposed bone and osteonecrosis of the mandible, and shared one common clinical feature: all of them were treated with bisphosphonate zoledronate, administered intravenously for long periods. Sequential orthopantomograms (OPGs) and histological evaluation have been analysed from the biopsies of the non healing dental extraction sites of these patients.

RESULTS

After a routine dental extraction, these patients developed avascular osteonecrosis of the mandible and secondary bone infection with Actinomyces israelii (actinomycotic osteomyelitis), with no evidence of metastatic disease evaluated by biopsy. In these three described clinical cases, surgical debridment without flap elevation, intensive antibiotherapy and the suspension of the zoledronate treatment allowed a partial recovery of the patients. The purpose of this clinical report is to point out that patients suffering from multiple myeloma can develop bone osteonecrosis induced by treatment with bisphosphonates. Research to determine the mechanism of this dental phenomenon is needed to fully validate and substantiate the possible link between bisphosphonate treatment of multiple myeloma or other cancer diseases and avascular osteonecrosis of the jaws. Until then, clinicians involved in the care of patients at risk should consider this possible complication.

Bisphosphonates: From Bench to Bedside

The discovery and development of the bisphosphonates (BPs) as a major class of drugs for the treatment of bone diseases has been a fascinating journey that is still not over. In clinical medicine, several BPs are established as the treatments of choice for various diseases of excessive bone resorption, including Paget's disease of bone, myeloma and bone metastases, and osteoporosis. Bisphosphonates are chemically stable analogues of inorganic pyrophosphate, and are resistant to breakdown by enzymatic hydrolysis. Bisphosphonates inhibit bone resorption by being selectively taken up and adsorbed to mineral surfaces in bone, where they interfere with the action of the bone-resorbing osteoclasts. Bisphosphonates are internalized by osteoclasts and interfere with specific biochemical processes. Bisphosphonates can be classified into at least two groups with different molecular modes of action. The simpler non-nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates (such as clodronate and etidronate) can be metabolically incorporated into nonhydrolyzable analogues of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) that may inhibit ATP-dependent intracellular enzymes. The more potent, nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates (such as pamidronate, alendronate, risedronate, ibandronate, and zoledronate) are not metabolized in this way but can inhibit enzymes of the mevalonate pathway, thereby preventing the biosynthesis of isoprenoid compounds that are essential for the posttranslational modification of small GTP-binding proteins (which are also GTPases) such as rab, rho, and rac. The inhibition of protein prenylation and the disruption of the function of these key regulatory proteins explain the loss of osteoclast activity and induction of apoptosis. The key target for bisphosphonates is farnesyl pyrophosphate synthase (FPPS) within osteoclasts, and the recently elucidated crystal structure of this enzyme reveals how BPs bind to and inhibit at the active site via their critical N atoms. In conclusion, bisphosphonates are now established as an important class of drugs for the treatment of many bone diseases, and their mode of action is being unraveled. As a result their full therapeutic potential is gradually being realized.

Comparison of the analgesic efficacy of pamidronate and synthetic human calcitonin in osteoporotic vertebral fractures: a double-blind controlled study

Our aim was to compare the analgesic efficacy of pamidronate (PAM) and synthetic human calcitonin (CT) in intravenous infusion for recent painful benign vertebral compression in a randomised prospective double-blind study. Twenty-seven patients aged 49-85 years with painful benign non-traumatic vertebral compression were included in the study. They received either PAM (1 mg/kg) or synthetic human CT (1.5 mg) as an intravenous infusion. Pain and functional disability were evaluated before infusion, and 4 and 30 days afterwards. The pain score assessed on a visual analogue scale at day 0 was 5.94+/-2.47 in patients treated with PAM and 6.27+/-2.50 in patients treated with CT (p=0.74); at day 4, 4.8+/-2.80 with PAM vs 3.9+/-2.68 with CT (p=0.37); and at day 30, 3.6+/-3.13 with PAM vs 3.10+/-2.76 with CT (p=0.70). Spinal function scores were 18.21+/-3.17 at day 0 in patients treated with PAM vs 17.23+/-4.42 in patients treated with CT (p=0.69) and at day 30, 13.7+/-5.36 with PAM vs 12.33+/-3.22 with CT (p=0.68). We found no advantage of PAM over CT in a single intravenous infusion for the treatment of painful recent benign vertebral compression. Since CT is ten times less costly, its use should be preferred.

Concepts, Considerations, and Concerns on the Cutting Edge of Radiofrequency Ablation

Radiofrequency (RF) ablation is rapidly expanding from a tool to treat isolated hepatic malignancy to a therapy for patients with renal, adrenal, skeletal, breast, lung, and other soft-tissue neoplasms. The purpose of this article is to review the status of RF ablation outside the liver and lung and compare outcomes with current clinical standards when appropriate. The author also reviews how differences in local tissue environments play a role in creation of a thermal lesion and achievement of subsequent clinical success.

Short-term zoledronic acid treatment increases bone mineral density and marrow clonogenic fibroblast progenitors after allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Although osteoporosis is a relatively common complication after allogeneic stem cell transplantation, the role of bisphosphonates in its management has not yet been completely established. Thirty-two patients who underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation were prospectively evaluated for bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine (LS) and femoral neck (FN) after a median period of 12.2 months. Then, 15 of the patients with osteoporosis or rapidly progressing osteopenia (bone loss > 5%/yr) received three monthly doses of 4 mg zoledronic acid iv. Fifteen patients were followed up without treatment, and all 30 patients were reevaluated after 12 months for BMD and bone turnover markers. By using enriched mesenchymal stem cells in the colony-forming units fibroblast (CFU-F) assay, we evaluated the osteogenic stromal lineage. This procedure was performed in both groups of patients at study entry and after 12 months. The average BMD loss was 3.42% at LS and 3.8% at FN during a 1-yr longitudinal evaluation in 32 patients. Subsequently, BMD increased at both LS and FN (9.8 and 6.4%, respectively) in the zoledronic acid-treated cohort. Hydroxyproline excretion decreased, and serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase increased significantly, whereas serum osteocalcin increase did not reach the limit of significance. A significant increase in CFU-F growth in vitro was induced by in vivo zoledronic acid administration. In the untreated group, no significant change was observed in bone turnover markers, LS BMD (-2.1%), FN BMD (-2.3%), and CFU-F colony number. In conclusion, short-term zoledronic acid treatment consistently improved both LS and FN BMD in transplanted patients who were at high risk for fast and/or persistent bone loss, partly by increasing the osteogenic progenitors in the stromal cell compartment.

Evolution of treatment for metastatic spine disease

The management of patients with metastatic disease of the spine should be highly individualized and depends on several factors, including the clinical presentation, duration of symptoms, tu-mor type, anticipated radiosensitivity, tumor lo-cation, extent of extraspinal disease, integrity of the spinal column, and medical fitness and life expectancy of the patient. Early diagnosis and intervention are of paramount importance in improving the likelihood of functional neurologic recovery, with the maintenance of ambulation as the primary goal. Effective management of axial spinal pain involves reconstruction and stabilization of the spinal column. Although the ideal therapy has not been established, a wide range of management options is currently available.

Bisphosphonates for the treatment of Charcot neuroarthropathy

Excess osteoclastic activity is believed to be responsible for the destruction in Charcot neuropathic joint disease. By intervening early in the destructive process, it may be possible to halt the progression toward the devastating bone and joint deformity responsible for morbidity in Charcot feet. This retrospective study evaluated the effects of the bisphosphonate pamidronate on associated signs of Charcot. The 13 study patients (14 infusions) administered pamidronate were compared with 10 control patients who were treated with traditional immobilization methods. Limb temperature and alkaline phosphatase levels were measured as markers of the Charcot process. After pamidronate infusion, limb temperature decreased a mean 2.8 degrees F by 48 hours and 7.4 degrees F by 2 weeks. The alkaline phosphatase levels also decreased an average 53% 2 weeks after infusion. The control group showed no reduction in limb temperature at 48 hours, and had an average limb temperature reduction of 2.3 degrees F at 2 to 3 weeks. This was significantly less than the temperature reduction in the treated group ( P = .008 at 48 hours and P = .001 at 2 weeks). Mean alkaline phosphatase levels declined only 9% in the control group, a significantly smaller decline than in the pamidronate-infusion group ( P = .001). These results suggest that pamidronate may be useful in halting the acute phase of Charcot neuroarthropathy.

Risedronate and pamidronate treatment in the clinical management of patients with severe Paget's disease of bone and acquired resistance to bisphosphonates

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of risedronate and pamidronate in 30 patients (mean age = 57.86 +/- 8.90 years) with severe Paget's disease of bone (PDB), showing acquired resistance to intravenous (IV) clodronate treatment. Fifteen patients were treated with oral risedronate (30 mg/day for 8 weeks). Treatment was repeated in patients without evidence of PDB remission [total alkaline phosphatase (tALP) serum levels in the normal range] at day 120. Fifteen patients were treated with IV pamidronate (30 mg/day for 3 days). Pamidronate treatment (60 mg/day for 3 days) was repeated in patients without evidence of PDB remission at day 120. At day 60, a significant decrease in tALP serum levels was obtained in all pagetic patients. At day 360, 13 (86.6%) patients treated with risedronate achieved PDB remission, 9 patients during the initial treatment and 4 after retreatment. Two patients showed a significant decrease in tALP serum levels without clinical remission after two risedronate treatments. At the same time, 12 (80%) patients treated with pamidronate achieved PDB remission, 6 patients during the first treatment and 6 after retreatment. Three patients showed a significant decrease in tALP serum levels but no clinical remission after two pamidronate courses. Two of these patients showed a relapse during the study. The incidence of minor side effects and transient hyperparathyroidism related to bisphosphonate treatment was significantly lower after risedronate therapy. In patients with resistant PDB, oral risedronate therapy has comparable efficacy to IV pamidronate with a lower incidence of treatment-related side effects.

Managing cancer-related skeletal events with bisphosphonates

Bone metastases cause considerable morbidity. This article discusses the benefits of bisphosphonates, which are now well established in the treatment of skeletal complications across a wide range of tumour types.

Bone cancer pain: from mechanism to model to therapy

Although bone cancer pain can be severe and is relatively common, very little is known about the basic mechanisms that generate and maintain this debilitating pain. To begin to define the mechanisms that give rise to bone cancer pain, a mouse model was developed using the intramedullary injection and containment of osteolytic sarcoma cells in the mouse femur. These tumor cells induced bone destruction as well as ongoing and movement-evoked pain behaviors similar to that found in patients with bone cancer pain. In addition, there was a significant reorganization of the spinal cord that received sensory input from the cancerous bone, and this reorganization was significantly different from that observed in mouse models of chronic neuropathic or inflammatory pain. To determine whether this mouse model of bone cancer could be used to define the basic mechanisms giving rise to bone cancer pain, we targeted excessive osteoclast activity using osteoprotegerin, a secreted decoy receptor that inhibits osteoclast activity. Osteoprotegerin blocked excessive tumor-induced, osteoclast-mediated bone destruction, and significantly reduced ongoing and movement-evoked pain, and the neurochemical reorganization of the spinal cord. These data suggest that this model can provide insight into the mechanisms that generate bone cancer pain and provide a platform for developing and testing novel analgesics to block bone cancer pain.

Metastatic bone disease and tumour-induced hypercalcaemia: treatment options

Metastatic bone disease in malignancy is responsible for considerable morbidity and mortality. Problems include debilitating bone pain and skeletal-related events (SREs), including tumour-induced hypercalcaemia. This article provides an overview of the different approaches to managing bone disease in malignancy with particular focus on the role of bisphosphonates. The three generations of bisphosphonates are discussed in relation to their role in treating bone pain and hypercalcaemia, and also in terms of their potential for being used in a prophylactic way to prevent or delay SREs.

Zoledronic Acid

Zoledronic acid (Zometa), a parenteral bisphosphonate, is an inhibitor of osteoclast-mediated bone resorption and is used in the management of patients with cancer. Zoledronic acid 4 mg is administered as an intravenous infusion over 15 minutes. In the treatment of bone metastases, zoledronic acid is the first and only bisphosphonate to demonstrate efficacy in patients with a broad range of tumour types and in multiple myeloma. In well-designed trials, a single 4 mg dose of zoledronic acid showed good efficacy in the treatment of patients with hypercalcaemia of malignancy. Zoledronic acid 4 mg was superior to pamidronic acid 90 mg, administered as a 2-hour infusion, as assessed by normalised serum calcium concentrations 10 days after administration. In conjunction with antineoplastic therapy, zoledronic acid was an effective long-term (up to 25 months) treatment for skeletal-related events in patients with bone metastases associated with multiple myeloma or solid tumours. In patients with bone metastases secondary to breast cancer or bone lesions from myeloma, zoledronic acid was at least as effective as pamidronic acid, based on assessments of skeletal-related events 25 months after the start of treatment. In addition, compared with pamidronic acid, the overall risk of developing skeletal complications, including hypercalcaemia of malignancy, was significantly reduced in recipients of zoledronic acid. Compared with pamidronic acid, zoledronic acid reduced the risk of patients with breast cancer developing a skeletal-related event by an additional 20%. Zoledronic acid was significantly more effective than placebo on most efficacy measures in patients with bone metastases secondary to other solid tumours (e.g. lung, prostate) and showed sustained efficacy for up to 15 months. Preliminary data indicate that its efficacy in these patients is sustained for up to 24 months. Estimates of the cost effectiveness of zoledronic acid in the treatment of prostate cancer were consistent with those of other bisphosphonates, and cost-effectiveness ratios were within limits considered acceptable economic value. Zoledronic acid was generally well tolerated, with a tolerability profile similar to that of pamidronic acid and placebo. As with other bisphosphonates, deterioration of renal function has occasionally been reported in patients receiving zoledronic acid and monitoring of serum creatinine is recommended during treatment. The efficacy of zoledronic acid is therefore well established in patients with hypercalcaemia of malignancy and, for up to 25 months, in the treatment of complications arising from metastatic bone disease in patients with multiple myeloma or solid tumours. The clinical profile of zoledronic acid compares favourably with that of pamidronic acid in patients with cancer and zoledronic acid has a more convenient administration schedule with the potential for better compliance. Thus, zoledronic acid is an effective bisphosphonate and is positioned to play an important role in the management of advanced cancer patients with bone metastases.

Drug-induced and toxic myopathies

Drug-induced myopathies and, more rarely, rhabdomyolysis, are a common biological and clinical setting for clinical rheumatologists. The focus of this chapter is to review (i) the clinical presentation and management of these adverse drug reactions (ADR) according to pain and associated neurological symptoms, (ii) the common drugs prescribed by rheumatologists which may induce reactions such as ADR, with special reference to new drugs, (iii) the pathological classification associated with specific patterns, and (iv) the risk factors leading to myotoxicity (including genetic predisposition). Specific features to be reviewed include macrophage myofasciitis and biological agents of major importance when considering terrorist attacks with biological weapons. When diagnosis is suspected, discontinuation of the putative drug(s) is mandatory and should be carefully monitored.

American Society of Clinical Oncology 2003 update on the role of bisphosphonates and bone health issues in women with breast cancer

PURPOSE

To update the 2000 ASCO guidelines on the role of bisphosphonates in women with breast cancer and address the subject of bone health in these women.

RESULTS

For patients with plain radiographic evidence of bone destruction, intravenous pamidronate 90 mg delivered over 2 hours or zoledronic acid 4 mg over 15 minutes every 3 to 4 weeks is recommended. There is insufficient evidence supporting the efficacy of one bisphosphonate over the other. Starting bisphosphonates in women who demonstrate bone destruction through imaging but who have normal plain radiographs is considered reasonable treatment. Starting bisphosphonates in women with only an abnormal bone scan but without evidence of bone destruction is not recommended. The presence or absence of bone pain should not be a factor in initiating bisphosphonates. In patients with a serum creatinine less than 3.0 mg/dL (265 mumol/L), no change in dosage, infusion time, or interval is required. Infusion times less than 2 hours with pamidronate or less than 15 minutes with zoledronic acid should be avoided. Creatinine should be monitored before each dose of either agent in accordance with US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) labeling. Oncology professionals, especially medical oncologists, need to take an expanded role in the routine and regular assessment of the osteoporosis risk in women with breast cancer. The panel recommends an algorithm for patient management to maintain bone health.

CONCLUSION

Bisphosphonates provide a supportive, albeit expensive and non-life-prolonging, benefit to many patients with bone metastases. Current research is focusing on bisphosphonates as adjuvant therapy. Although new data addressing when to stop therapy, alternative doses or schedules for administration, and how to best coordinate bisphosphonates with other palliative therapies are needed, they are not currently being investigated.

A role for curative surgery in the treatment of selected patients with metastatic breast cancer

Although metastatic breast cancer is widely believed to carry a grim prognosis, treatment developments over the past 25 years have greatly improved survival outcomes in these patients. In selected cases, aggressive treatment approaches may occasionally result in long-term survival of 15 years or more. This review considers the role of surgery in the treatment of single or multiple metastatic lesions restricted to one site. For each site, available literature from 1992-2002 was assessed to determine the role of surgery on survival outcomes and to determine appropriate criteria for selecting the best candidates for surgery. For lung, liver, brain, and sternum metastases, the use of surgery with or without adjuvant therapy resulted in greater median survival times and 5-year survival rates. The best candidate for surgery had no evidence of additional metastatic disease, good performance status, and a long disease-free interval after treatment of the primary tumor. Current treatment standards for breast cancer follow-up do not include imaging studies other than mammography. The addition of chest x-rays as part of routine follow-up should be considered as a cost-effective approach for early assessment of metastases to the lung or sternum that may be appropriate for surgical excision.

Cellular mechanism of inhibition of osteoclastic resorption of bone and calcified cartilage by long-term pamidronate administration in ovariectomized mature rats

We examined the effects of long-term bisphosphonate (BP, pamidronate) administration at a therapeutic dose (1.5 mg/kg/day) on the distribution, structure, and vacuolar-type H(+)-ATPase expression of osteoclasts, and the resulting trabecular bone volume and structure in ovariectomized (OVX) mature rats. Six-month-old female rats were allocated to sham-operated control, untreated-OVX, and BP-administered OVX groups. Postoperatively, BP was administered intraperitoneally once a day to OVX rats for up to 30 days. On postoperative days 14, 30, and 60, all of the rats were killed and the distal metaphyseal area of the dissected humeri was examined. Quantitative backscattered-electron image analysis revealed that the trabecular bone volume/unit medullary area in untreated OVX rats was significantly (P < 0.05) lower than that in sham-operated controls at 30 and 60 days postoperation. BP administration significantly (P < 0.05) increased trabecular bone volume at 14, 30, and 60 days postoperation in BP-administered OVX rats compared to both sham-operated and untreated OVX rats. Compared to untreated OVX rats, the number of tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP)-positive osteoclasts along the bone trabeculae in BP-administered OVX rats was not significantly decreased on days 14 and 30, but was significantly decreased on day 60. Ultrastructurally, BP administration caused the disappearance of both the ruffled border (RB) and the clear zone (CZ) structures, and decreased the expression of vacuolar-type H(+)-ATPase in most osteoclasts, but did not significantly induce apoptosis of osteoclasts detected by the terminal dUTP nick end-labeling (TUNEL) method. Our results suggest that long-term BP administration significantly reduces bone and calcified cartilage resorption through impairment of the structure and bone-resorbing function of osteoclasts, and thereby effectively maintains trabecular bone volume and structure in ovariectomy-induced acute estrogen deficiency in mature rats.

Induction of cell death of human osteogenic sarcoma cells by zoledronic acid resembles anoikis

The aim of this study was to investigate the cytotoxic activity of the third-generation nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate zoledronic acid (ZOL) as a single agent, and in combination with clinically relevant anticancer drugs, in a panel of human osteogenic sarcoma cell lines (HOS, BTK-143, MG-63, SJSA-1, G-292, and SAOS2). We found that ZOL, when used alone, reduced cell number in a dose- and time-dependent manner, due either to cell cycle arrest in S-phase or to the induction of apoptosis. In the sensitive HOS, BTK-143, and G-292 cell lines, genomic DNA fragmentation and morphological changes characteristic of apoptosis were evident, and cells became nonadherent. Induction of apoptosis in osteosarcoma cells by ZOL was associated with caspase activation. However, coaddition of the broad-spectrum caspase inhibitors, z-VAD-fmk, Boc-D-fmk, or the caspase-3-specific inhibitor z-DEVD fmk, failed to protect these cells from ZOL-induced apoptosis. Our data support a ZOL-specific induction of cell apoptosis that involves cell detachment (anoikis), and in which caspase activation occurs secondarily to, and is redundant as a mediator of cell death. The addition of geranylgeraniol, an intermediate of the mevalonate pathway, suppressed the ZOL-induced apoptosis, suggesting that the cytotoxic effects of ZOL in osteosarcoma cells were mediated by the mevalonate pathway. While treatment of osteosarcoma cells with the chemotherapeutic agents doxorubicin or etoposide decreased cell viability, combination of these agents with ZOL did not significantly augment apoptosis in any of the cell lines tested. These observations suggest that ZOL has direct effects on the proliferation and survival of osteosarcoma cells in vitro, which has implications for future therapy of osteosarcoma.

Zoledronic acid: a review of its use in the management of bone metastases and hypercalcaemia of malignancy

Zoledronic acid (Zometa) is an effective inhibitor of osteoclast-mediated bone resorption. Zoledronic acid demonstrated efficacy in the reduction of skeletalrelated events (SREs) in patients with multiple myeloma or bone metastases secondary to breast cancer, prostate cancer or other solid tumours, or hypercalcaemia of malignancy. Zoledronic acid was effective in patients with multiple myeloma or metastatic breast cancer with osteolytic or mixed bone lesions. The proportion of patients who experienced an SRE was similar during 12 months of treatment with zoledronic acid 4mg or pamidronic acid 90mg, but significantly fewer patients receiving zoledronic acid required radiotherapy to bone. Furthermore, in patients with breast cancer and osteolytic lesions, median time to a first SRE was more than 4 months longer with zoledronic acid than with pamidronic acid. In the multiple event analysis in a 12-month extension study (total study duration was 25 months) in patients with breast cancer, zoledronic acid was superior to pamidronic acid, with an 18% reduction in the risk of experiencing an SRE. Both drugs were associated with a slight reduction in pain. Zoledronic acid 4mg, compared with placebo, significantly reduced the proportion of patients with prostate cancer bone metastases experiencing an SRE, particularly pathological fractures after 15 months' treatment. The drug also significantly delayed the onset of skeletal complications compared with placebo in patients with prostate cancer and other solid tumours including non-small cell lung cancer. When administered as a single 15-minute intravenous infusion, zoledronic acid 4mg was significantly more effective than pamidronic acid administered as a 2-hour infusion in the treatment of severe hypercalcaemia of malignancy, as assessed by complete responses measuring normalised serum calcium concentrations at day 10 after a single dose. Furthermore, zoledronic acid normalised serum calcium concentrations significantly faster than pamidronic acid, and the duration of response and median time to relapse were approximately twice as long in zoledronic acid recipients than in pamidronic acid recipients. Zoledronic acid is well tolerated and has a similar tolerability profile to pamidronic acid. The most commonly reported adverse events included flu-like symptoms (fever, arthralgias, myalgias and bone pain), fatigue, gastrointestinal reactions, anaemia, weakness, dyspnoea and oedema.

CONCLUSION

In conjunction with antitumour therapy, zoledronic acid should be considered for routine use to reduce skeletal complications in patients with advanced malignancies involving bone. In patients with hypercalcaemia of malignancy, zoledronic acid is expected to become the treatment of choice.

Bony pathology in the cancer patient

Bony pathology in the cancer patient represents a significant source of morbidity and mortality. Complications include insufficiency and pathological fractures resulting from either medical treatments or bony metastases that can cause significant functional limitations. Additional complications include spinal cord compression, hypercalcemia, and bone marrow failure. Rehabilitation management of such conditions is reviewed, with an emphasis on diagnostic and therapeutic management. Bracing and focused rehabilitation programs facilitate maximal participation and functional outcomes, which can result in an enhanced quality of life. Specific rehabilitation goals and strategies are discussed, with an emphasis on tailoring these according to the functional staging of the patient.

American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guidelines: the role of bisphosphonates in multiple myeloma

PURPOSE

To determine clinical practice guidelines for the use of bisphosphonates in the prevention and treatment of lytic bone disease in multiple myeloma and to determine their respective role relative to other conventional therapies for this condition.

METHODS

An expert multidisciplinary Panel reviewed pertinent information from the published literature through January 2002. Values for levels of evidence and grade of recommendation were assigned by expert reviewers and approved by the Panel. Expert consensus was used if there were insufficient published data. The Panel addressed which patients to treat and when to treat them in the course of their disease. Additionally, specific drug delivery issues, duration of therapy, initiation of treatment and management of treatment of lytic bone disease was reviewed and compared with other forms of therapy for lytic bone lesions. Finally, the Panel discussed patient and physician expectations associated with this therapy for bony metastases, as well as public policy implications related to the use of bisphosphonates. The guidelines underwent external review by selected physicians, by the Health Services Research Committee members, and by the ASCO Board of Directors.

RESULTS

The available evidence involving randomized controlled trials is modest but supports that oral clodronate, intravenous pamidronate, and intravenous zoledronic acid are superior to placebo in reducing skeletal complications. A reduction in vertebral fractures has consistently been seen across all studies. No agent has shown a definitive survival benefit. Intravenous zoledronic acid has recently been shown to be as effective as intravenous pamidronate. Because there are no direct comparisons between clodronate and pamidronate or zoledronic acid, the superiority of one agent cannot be definitively established. However, the panel recommends only intravenous pamidronate or zoledronic acid in light of the use of the time to first skeletal event as the primary end point and more complete assessment of bony complications in studies evaluating it. Additionally, clodronate is not available in the United States. The choice between pamidronate and zoledronic acid will depend on choosing between the higher drug cost of zoledronic acid, with its shorter, more convenient infusion time (15 minutes), versus the less expensive drug, pamidronate, with its longer infusion time (2 hours).

CONCLUSION

Bisphosphonates provide a meaningful supportive benefit to multiple myeloma patients with lytic bone disease. However, further research on bisphosphonates is warranted, including the following: (1) when to start and stop therapy, (2) how to integrate their use with other treatments for lytic bone disease, (3) how to evaluate their role in myeloma patients without lytic bone involvement, (4) how to distinguish between symptomatic and asymptomatic bony events, and (5) how to better determine their cost-benefit consequence.

Pamidronate treatment in SAPHO syndrome

OBJECTIVE

Pamidronate is usually administered because of its antiosteoclastic effects but seems to have anti-inflammatory properties also. SAPHO syndrome is characterized by both increased bone remodeling and inflammatory osteitis, indicating that it may respond favorably to pamidronate's dual mechanism of action.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We report five cases of SAPHO syndrome refractory to standard treatments. All patients were taking nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, either alone or in combination with analgesics, glucocorticoids, and/or second-line drugs. We used intravenous pamidronate during exacerbations of the disease. The primary evaluation criterion was the reduction in the visual analog scale (VAS) score for pain, and a response was defined as a greater than 50% reduction.

RESULTS

Four of the five patients had a response after 1 week. Two of these four patients still met the response criterion after 3 months. Four of the five patients were able to reduce the dosage of their usual medications. In one patient, pamidronate therapy was associated with an increase in the intervals between exacerbations. Joint Bone

Bisphosphonates for the relief of pain secondary to bone metastases

BACKGROUND

Bisphosphonates form part of standard therapy for hypercalcemia and the prevention of skeletal events in some cancers. However, the role of bisphosphonates in pain relief for bony metastases remains uncertain.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effectiveness of bisphosphonates for the relief of pain from bone metastases.

SEARCH STRATEGY

MEDLINE (1966-1999), EMBASE (1980-1999), CancerLit (1966-1999), the Cochrane library (Issue 1, 2000) and the Oxford Pain Database were searched using the strategy devised by the Cochrane Pain, Palliative and Supportive Care Group with additional terms 'diphosphonate', 'bisphosphonate', 'multiple myeloma' and 'bone neoplasms'. (Last search: January 2000).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized trials of bisphosphonates compared with open, blinded, or different doses/types of bisphosphonates in cancer patients were included where pain and/or analgesic consumption were outcome measures. Studies where pain was reported only by observers were excluded.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Article eligibility, quality assessment and data extraction were undertaken by both reviewers. The proportions of patients with pain relief at 4, 8 and 12 weeks were assessed. The proportion of patients with analgesic reduction, the mean pain score, mean analgesic consumption, adverse drug reactions, and quality of life data were compared as secondary outcomes.

MAIN RESULTS

Thirty randomized controlled studies (21 blinded, four open and five active control) with a total of 3682 subjects were included. For each outcome, there were few studies with available data. For the proportion of patients with pain relief (eight studies) pooled data showed benefits for the treatment group, with an NNT at 4 weeks of 11[95% CI 6-36] and at 12 weeks of 7 [95% CI 5-12]. In terms of adverse drug reactions, the NNH was 16 [95% CI 12-27] for discontinuation of therapy. Nausea and vomiting were reported in 24 studies with a non-significant trend for greater risk in the treatment group. One study showed a small improvement in quality of life for the treatment group at 4 weeks. The small number of studies in each subgroup with relevant data limited our ability to explore the most effective bisphosphonates and their relative effectiveness for different primary neoplasms.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

There is evidence to support the effectiveness of bisphosphonates in providing some pain relief for bone metastases. There is insufficient evidence to recommend bisphosphonates for immediate effect; as first line therapy; to define the most effective bisphosphonates or their relative effectiveness for different primary neoplasms. Bisphosphonates should be considered where analgesics and/or radiotherapy are inadequate for the management of painful bone metastases.

Successful Pamidronate Treatment of Severe and Refractory Regional Migratory Osteoporosis

We report the case of a middle-aged patient with repeated attacks of regional migratory osteoporosis of the lower limbs, manifesting as severe pain and swelling of both joint and periarticular areas, and marked physical disability during a period of 2 1/2 years. After the therapeutic failure of conservative therapy (physical therapy, rehabilitation therapy, analgesics and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)) and after the correct diagnosis was reached, pamidronate treatment was instituted. The results were a rapid, complete, and long-lasting remission of the symptoms and the renewal of the patient's previous activities. Intravenous biphosphates are proposed as a safe and promising therapy for regional migratory osteoporosis. To our knowledge, this is the first report of pamidronate treatment for this condition.

Metastatic bone disease and tumour-induced hypercalcaemia: the role of bisphosphonates

Tumour-induced hypercalcaemia (TIH) is the most common metabolic disorder associated with cancer, and if left untreated is associated with a low survival rate. Bisphosphonates are potent inhibitors of bone resorption. They have emerged as the standard method of treatment for TIH and a new form of medical therapy for bone metastases in addition to current treatments. Newer forms of bisphosphonates are 100-1000 times more potent than pamidronate, the current gold standard. One of these third generation bisphosphonates, zoledronic acid (Zometa, Novartis Pharmaceuticals) has already been shown to provide more effective treatment of TIH than pamidronate. Ongoing research is aimed at choosing the optimum route, type of bisphosphonate and combination therapy to inhibit the development of bone metastases and TIH.

Incremental cost analysis of ambulatory clinic and home-based intravenous therapy for patients with multiple myeloma

BACKGROUND

Patients with multiple myeloma and other forms of cancer receiving pamidronate via intravenous (IV) infusion at the Hamilton Regional Cancer Centre in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada face 2 treatment options: they can have their entire treatment completed at the clinic using traditional IV therapy (e.g. IV bag and pole) or they can have the treatment initiated at the clinic and then return home to complete the treatment utilising a portable and disposable IV therapy device.

OBJECTIVE

To perform a cost analysis of these 2 treatment options.

PERSPECTIVE

Societal.

METHODS AND PATIENTS

Data on all patients with multiple myeloma who attended the Hamilton Regional Cancer Centre for pamidronate therapy from November 1, 1997 to October 31, 1998 were collected from clinic records. As almost all of these patients with multiple myeloma completed their IV therapy at home, comparison to clinic-based therapy was based on derived cost estimates. Cost data, where possible, were acquired from the Hamilton Regional Cancer Centre's records. A sensitivity analysis was also conducted.

RESULTS

In the base-case scenario for the study period, the incremental cost of the infusion device and training in Canadian dollars ($Can; 1998 values) for the 48 patients (299 cycles) who had their infusion initiated at the clinic but completed at home was $Can 5.50/cycle ($Can 4,636 for the 299 cycles). If these 48 patients had had their entire infusion at the clinic, the incremental costs of overtime treatment, parking, clinic overheads and lost work or leisure time would have been $Can 68.49/cycle ($Can 20,477 for the 299 cycles). Therefore, shifting treatment from the clinic to the home resulted in net cost savings to society of $Can 52.98/cycle ($Can 15,841 for the 299 cycles). Sensitivity analysis of best- and worst-cost scenarios did not alter the substantive findings although the relative difference between treatment options varied. In the best-case scenario, home treatment was $Can 95.97/cycle ($Can 28,696 for the 299 cycles) less costly than clinic treatment, while in the worst-case scenario, home treatment was $Can 17.19/cycle ($Can 5,141 for the 299 cycles) less costly than clinic treatment. The results also demonstrated that clinic overheads, the cost of a portable and disposable infusion device and the cost of lost work and leisure time had the greatest impact on incremental costs for each treatment option.

CONCLUSION

Subject to study limitations, a significant cost advantage was demonstrated through the home-based treatment option for patients with multiple myeloma. Key issues that must be addressed in future evaluations include the precise determination of clinic overheads, the valuation of lost work and/or leisure time and the direct cost of portable and disposable infusion devices.

Advances in the systemic treatment of cancers in the elderly

Cancer is a disease of the elderly. More than 50% of all cancers and deaths occur in people over 65 years. Older cancer patients are less likely to be referred to centers or to be given adequate chemotherapy. The elderly are under-represented in Phase I and II trials. Some of this hesitancy to give chemotherapy is related to the increased presence of co-morbid conditions in the elderly. Toxicity is another concern. This review summarizes data from literature on the effectiveness, outcome, and toxicity of chemotherapy in selected tumors. Information is presented on age related effects. In addition, a summary of new agents and biologics is presented that needs to be looked at for age related effects. Some comments are made on the pharmacokinetic impact of physiologic changes in the elderly on chemotherapy drugs. As the world's population ages, we need to include the elderly in trials to get data on age related effects. Most of the information presented shows that effective chemotherapy can be given safely to the elderly and the outcomes and toxicity are equivalent for many of the common solid tumors.

The role of bisphosphonates in metastatic breast cancer

The American Society of Clinical Oncology has recently developed guidelines for the use of bisphosphonates in breast cancer. Highlights of these guidelines are reviewed. Specific issues addressed included when in the course of disease should treatment be started, the duration of therapy, the role of bisphosphonates in pain control, their safety, and current estimates of their cost effectiveness. Although intravenous bisphosphonates, primarily pamidronate, have been shown to reduce the frequency of skeletal-related complications in women with known lytic bone metastases from breast cancer, numerous major areas of clinical importance related to their use have not been studied and are highlighted.

Advances in pain management for older adult patients

Management of pain is crucial to the success of any program of care and support for dying patients and their families. Pain can be controlled in more than 90% of older adults. Components of an effective program include comprehensive, repeated pain assessment; detection and treatment of complicating medical and psychological disorders (e.g., delirium); spiritual concerns; and the judicious use of nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic therapies, radiation, and radiopharmaceuticals. Strategies that enable clinicians to prevent and treat the expected complications of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory and opioid therapies are reviewed. Strategies to change opioid agents or routes to minimize opioid-induced side effects and to provide effective pain relief as death nears are presented.

American Society of Clinical Oncology guideline on the role of bisphosphonates in breast cancer. American Society of Clinical Oncology Bisphosphonates Expert Panel

PURPOSE

To determine clinical practice guidelines for the use of bisphosphonates in the prevention and treatment of bone metastases in breast cancer and their role relative to other therapies for this condition.

METHODS

An expert multidisciplinary panel reviewed pertinent information from the published literature and meeting abstracts through May 1999. Additional data collected as part of randomized trials and submitted to the United States Food and Drug Administration were also reviewed, and investigators were contacted for more recent information. Values for levels of evidence and grade of recommendation were assigned by expert reviewers and approved by the panel. Expert consensus was used if there were insufficient published data. The panel addressed which patients to treat and when in their course of disease, specific drug delivery issues, duration of therapy, management of bony metastases with other therapies, and the public policy implications. The guideline underwent external review by selected physicians, members of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Health Services Research Committee, and the ASCO Board of Directors.

RESULTS

Bisphosphonates have not had an impact on the most reliable cancer end point: overall survival. The benefits have been reductions in skeletal complications, ie, pathologic fractures, surgery for fracture or impending fracture, radiation, spinal cord compression, and hypercalcemia. Intravenous (IV) pamidronate 90 mg delivered over 1 to 2 hours every 3 to 4 weeks is recommended in patients with metastatic breast cancer who have imaging evidence of lytic destruction of bone and who are concurrently receiving systemic therapy with hormonal therapy or chemotherapy. For women with only an abnormal bone scan but without bony destruction by imaging studies or localized pain, there is insufficient evidence to suggest starting bisphosphonates. Starting bisphosphonates in patients without evidence of bony metastasis, even in the presence of other extraskeletal metastases, is not recommended. Studies of bisphosphonates in the adjuvant setting have yielded inconsistent results. Starting bisphosphonates in patients at any stage of their nonosseous disease, outside of clinical trials, despite a high risk for future bone metastasis, is currently not recommended. Oral bisphosphonates are one of several options which can be used for preservation of bone density in premenopausal patients with treatment-induced menopause. The panel suggests that, once initiated, IV bisphosphonates be continued until evidence of substantial decline in a patient's general performance status. The panel stresses that clinical judgment must guide what is a substantial decline. There is no evidence addressing the consequences of stopping bisphosphonates after one or more adverse skeletal events. Symptoms in the spine, pelvis, or femur require careful evaluation for spinal cord compression and pathologic fracture before bisphosphonate use and if symptoms recur, persist, or worsen during therapy. The panel recommends that current standards of care for cancer pain, analgesics and local radiation therapy, not be displaced by bisphosphonates. IV pamidronate is recommended in women with pain caused by osteolytic metastasis to relieve pain when used concurrently with systemic chemotherapy and/or hormonal therapy, since it was associated with a modest pain control benefit in controlled trials.

CONCLUSION

Bisphosphonates provide a meaningful supportive but not life-prolonging benefit to many patients with bone metastases from cancer. Further research is warranted to identify clinical predictors of when to start and stop therapy, to integrate their use with other treatments for bone metastases, to identify their role in the adjuvant setting in preventing bone metastases, and to better determine their cost-benefit consequences.