How Were the Elderly RA Patients Doing Over the Past Year?-A Post Hoc Analysis for Telephone Based Following Up to RA Patients in Zunyi China

Purpose

The quality of life (QoL) of elderly patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in Zunyi China based on health parameters has not been previously analyzed. This study compares the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) scores and prevailing health complications between <60y and ≥60y patients with RA. Data from 1166 patients with RA who visited the rheumatology department of Zunyi Medical University Hospital were followed up and retrospectively analyzed.

Patients and Methods

Data from 1166 patients with RA who visited the rheumatology department of Zunyi Medical University Hospital (2021.1-2022.8) were followed up and retrospectively analyzed.

Results

Twenty cases passed away at 61.55 ± 8.11y, which was 6.75 years less than the local average age of death. Elderly patients with RA reported lower recovery levels, and their levels of inflammatory markers such as Immunoglobulin M-rheumatoid factor (IgM-RF), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were significantly higher than those of younger patients during their past one-year observation period. The SF-36 results indicated that eight items of QoL in the elderly patients were all significantly inferior to <60y patients, while the complications of interstitial lung disease (ILD), latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) and, lung and herpes zoster infections were significantly higher.

Conclusion

Elderly patients had a higher disease activity along with poor QoL, more health-related complications, and susceptibility to infections. Our study emphasizes the imperative need for optimization of RA treatment modalities in the elderly to alleviate their sufferings.

Clinical Characteristics of Young-Onset Versus Elderly-Onset Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory disease with a prevalence of 1%, mainly affecting women aged 25-45. It is classified by the age of onset into young-onset rheumatoid arthritis (YORA, 16-65 years) and elderly-onset rheumatoid arthritis (EORA, over 65 years), with EORA often presenting suddenly with systemic symptoms and large joint involvement due to age-related immune changes. This systematic review and meta-analysis compare the clinical and epidemiological characteristics of EORA and YORA. Observational studies were selected from PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Database up to November 2023, focusing on a comparative analysis of both disease types with similar clinical progression and treatment duration limited to one month. Statistical analysis was performed in RStudio (Version 4.1.3, Posit Software, Boston, MA) using the "meta" package, applying a random effects model, inverse variance method, and Hartung-Knapp adjustment. Results for continuous variables were combined and grouped using the Cochrane formula, with medians and interquartile ranges transformed for uniformity. Four studies met the criteria. A trend was observed toward higher disease activity at diagnosis in the EORA group (mean difference (MD: 0.19, 95% CI -1.90 to 2.27), indicated by Disease Activity Score-28 (DAS28) and Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) indices (MD 6.17, 95% CI -20.60 to 32.94). The EORA group also had higher Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) scores (MD 0.21, 95% CI -0.03 to 0.46) and a greater number of painful (MD 1.31, 95% CI -0.86 to 3.47) and swollen joints (MD 2.35, 95% CI 0.77 to 3.92). Extra-articular manifestations, including rheumatoid nodules, lung involvement, and secondary Sjögren's syndrome, were more common in EORA patients (p < 0.004). In conclusion, the findings suggest that patients with EORA present with more intense disease activity at onset, a higher prevalence of extra-articular manifestations, greater levels of disability, and more pronounced radiographic changes. Despite these initial differences, EORA patients ultimately achieve long-term remission rates similar to those with YORA.

Elderly-onset rheumatoid arthritis receives less aggressive therapies than young-onset rheumatoid arthritis in an Argentinian cohort

OBJECTIVES

When rheumatoid arthritis (RA) starts after the age of 60 it is called elderly-onset rheumatoid arthritis (EORA) and when it starts earlier, young-onset rheumatoid arthritis. (YORA). There are few Latin American studies that compared both groups. The objective of the study was to evaluate differences in the clinical characteristics, evolution and treatment among patients with RA with onset before or after 60 years of age.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Observational study of patients with RA attended consecutively in four centers in Argentina. Sociodemographic data, comorbidities, clinical manifestations at diagnosis, presence of rheumatoid factor and/or anti-CCP (cyclic citrullinated peptide) and treatments received were collected. At the last visit, swollen and tender joints, assessment of disease activity by the patient and physician, the presence of radiographic erosions, and functional status using the HAQ-DI were recorded.

RESULTS

51 patients from each group were analyzed. The EORA group had a significantly higher proportion of smokers (58.8% vs. 35.3%, p = 0.029), cardiovascular history (54.9% vs. 21.6%, p = 0.001), abrupt onset (49% vs. 29.4%, p = 0.034) or with symptoms similar to PMR (19.6% vs. 0%, p = 0.001). Lower methotrexate doses were used in the EORA group: 19 mg (15-25) vs. 21.9 mg (20-25) (p = 0.0036) and more frequently did not receive bDMARDs or tsDMARDs.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

The benefits of intensive treatment in patients with RA have been described. In this study, the use of DMARDs in the EORA group was less intensive, suggesting that advanced age constitutes a barrier in the therapeutic choice.

Generation-Dependent Retention Rates and Reasons for Discontinuation of Molecular Targeted Therapies in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: From FIRST Registry

INTRODUCTION

The study aimed to optimize medical care for elderly patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) by examining the 3-year continuation rate of different molecular targeted therapies across age groups in Japan, which has a significant elderly population.

METHODS

The study included patients with RA who started molecular targeted therapies between 2013 and 2019 and divided them into three age groups. The primary outcome was to assess the 3-year continuation rate of each drug and analyze reasons for treatment discontinuation using inverse probability of treatment weighting.

RESULTS

Among 2292 patients analyzed, tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors were most commonly used in those younger than 65 years of age (43.5%), while Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors were also utilized (17.1%). In contrast, JAK inhibitors were less frequently used in patients aged 75 years and older (7.8%), with cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 immunoglobulin fusion proteins (CTLA4-Ig) being the most common (39.2%). JAK inhibitors and anti-interleukin-6 receptor (IL-6R) antibodies had higher continuation rates than other drugs in patients under 65 years (p < 0.001). For those aged 65-74 years, JAK inhibitors and CTLA4-Ig had higher continuation rates (p < 0.001), while among those aged 75 years and older, CTLA4-Ig and IL-6R antibodies had higher continuation rates (p < 0.001). Inadequate efficacy was the main reason for discontinuation in all age groups, while infection leading to discontinuation increased with age.

CONCLUSIONS

The study highlights the need to consider different age groups separately in elderly RA care. Among patients aged 75 years and older, abatacept and anti-IL-6R antibodies showed the highest continuation rates, suggesting their potential suitability and efficacy for this specific age cohort.

Difficult-to-Treat Rheumatoid Arthritis in Older Adults: Implications of Ageing for Managing Patients

Difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis is a heterogeneous term in which patients may present with difficulties in their management for different reasons. This can ultimately lead to patients being exposed to multiple treatments because of inefficacy (resulting from mechanisms intrinsic to rheumatoid arthritis or from non-inflammatory causes such as chronic pain syndrome or structural damage, among others), toxicity or adverse effects that may be linked to comorbidities. One particular group in which such characteristics may be more patent is older patients. Increasing life expectancy, an ageing population and the late onset of rheumatoid arthritis have led to an increased interest in the particularities of treating older patients. This may pose a challenge for physicians, as ageing has implications for optimal patient treatment owing to the potential presence of comorbidities, the risk of adverse events and perceptions of disease status by both physicians and patients. All of these factors may have implications for classifying and managing patients aged > 65 years as difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis, as these patients could be misclassified. This can occur when a significant proportion may still exhibit signs of active disease but not necessarily be difficult to treat because the treatment criterion has not been fulfilled. Alternatively, patients may be exposed to multiple biologic/targeted disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs because of contraindications and/or comorbid conditions. Treatment-to-target strategies and an adequate assessment of inflammatory rheumatoid arthritis activity in older patients should be undertaken, taking special care with associated comorbidities, polypharmacy and risk profiles. Such an approach can help to ensure appropriate treatment for older adults and avoid the misclassification of difficult-to-treat patients.

Safety and Effectiveness of Biologic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs in Older Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Prospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The number of older patients with rheumatoid arthritis is increasing, but data on drug effectiveness and safety in these patients are scarce. This study assessed the effectiveness and safety of biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in older patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

METHODS

This prospective cohort study was based on data recorded in the Rheumatic Diseases Portuguese Register (Reuma.pt). Treatment persistence, European League Against Rheumatism response at 6 and 12 months, and adverse events were compared between adult (age < 65 years), old (age 65-74 years), and very old (age ≥ 75 years) patients.

RESULTS

In total, 2401 patients were included, of which 379 were old and 83 were very old. Older patients had higher disease activity at baseline (Disease Activity Score 28: 5.5 in adults, 5.7 in old patients, and 6 in very old patients; p = 0.02) and more comorbidities, with patients aged 65-74 years beginning biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs later in the course of rheumatoid arthritis. Treatment persistence was similar in the three patient groups (p = 0.07). The European League Against Rheumatism response rates were comparable in the three groups at 6 months (81.6% of adults, 75.2% of old patients, and 81.8% of very old patients; p = 0.19), and inferior in old patients at 12 months. The proportion of patients who experienced adverse events was also similar in the three groups (21% of adults, 22.5% of old patients, and 22.9% of very old patients; p = 0.76), but the rate of serious adverse events was higher in old patients (1.94/100 patient-years) and very old patients (4.29/100 patient-years) compared with 1.03/100 patient-years in adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Adults, old patients, and very old patients with rheumatoid arthritis benefit similarly from biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug treatments, although older patients have more active disease at baseline and more comorbidities. However, it is necessary to consider the risk of serious adverse events in older patients when prescribing a biologic.

Design, synthesis, molecular modeling, and biological evaluation of acrylamide derivatives as potent inhibitors of human dihydroorotate dehydrogenase for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis

Human dihydroorotate dehydrogenase (DHODH) is a viable target for the development of therapeutics to treat cancer and immunological diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriasis and multiple sclerosis (MS). Herein, a series of acrylamide-based novel DHODH inhibitors as potential RA treatment agents were designed and synthesized. 2-Acrylamidobenzoic acid analog 11 was identified as the lead compound for structure-activity relationship (SAR) studies. The replacement of the phenyl group with naphthyl moieties improved inhibitory activity significantly to double-digit nanomolar range. Further structure optimization revealed that an acrylamide with small hydrophobic groups (Me, Cl or Br) at the 2-position was preferred. Moreover, adding a fluoro atom at the 5-position of the benzoic acid enhanced the potency. The optimization efforts led to potent compounds 42 and 53‒55 with IC50 values of 41, 44, 32, and 42 nmol/L, respectively. The most potent compound 54 also displayed favorable pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles and encouraging in vivo anti-arthritic effects in a dose-dependent manner.

Screening Tool for Older Persons' Appropriate Prescriptions for Japanese: Report of the Japan Geriatrics Society Working Group on "Guidelines for medical treatment and its safety in the elderly"

AIM

In 2005, the Japan Geriatrics Society published a list of potentially inappropriate medication that was an extract from the "Guidelines for medical treatment and its safety in the elderly 2005." The 2005 guidelines are due for a revision, and a new comprehensive list of potentially inappropriate medications is required.

METHODS

A total of 15 diseases, conditions and special areas related to their clinical care were selected. We originated clinical questions and keywords for these 15 areas, carried out a systematic review using these search criteria, and formulated guidelines applying the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system advocated by Minds2014. If we did not find good evidence despite the drug being clinically important, we looked for evidence of efficacy and for disease-specific guidelines, and incorporated them into our guidelines.

RESULTS

We selected 2098 articles (140 articles per area), and extracted another 186 articles through a manual search. We further added guidelines based on disease entity and made two lists, one of "drugs to be prescribed with special caution" and the other of "drugs to consider starting," primarily considering individuals aged 75 years or older or those who are frail or in need of special care.

CONCLUSIONS

New lists of potentially inappropriate medications and potential prescribing omissions called "Screening Tool for Older Person's Appropriate Prescriptions for Japanese" were constructed. We anticipate that future studies will highlight more evidence regarding the safety of high-quality drugs, further improving the provision of appropriate medical care for the elderly. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2016: 16: 983-1001.

Pharmacotherapy Pearls for the Geriatrician: Focus on Oral Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs Including Newer Agents

Providing safe and effective pharmacotherapy to the geriatric patients with rheumatological disorders is an ongoing struggle for the rheumatologist and geriatrician alike. Cohesive communication and partnership can improve the care of these patients and subvert adverse outcomes. Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, including methotrexate, hydroxychloroquine, sulfasalazine, and leflunomide, and the newest oral agent for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, tofacitinib, have distinctive monitoring and adverse effect profiles. This article provides the general practitioner or geriatrician with clinically relevant pearls regarding the use of these interventions in older patients.

[Safety of antirheumatic drug treatment in the elderly]

Mainly due to the general demographic changes and decreasing mortality in rheumatic diseases based on therapeutic progress, the proportion of older patients treated by rheumatologists is growing. Drug treatment in the elderly, however, harbors certain risks including age-specific pharmacokinetic features and high rates of multimorbidity and polypharmacy resulting in a risk of drug interactions and adherence problems. Nevertheless, older patients suffering from rheumatic diseases ought to be treated with the same intensity and same targets as the younger counterparts. Bearing all these facts in mind it is a balancing act for rheumatologists to find an optimal treatment for the individual elderly patient. Fear of risks should not lead to hesitant use of drugs leaving these patients alone with treatment deficits, as some studies have suggested.

Elderly-onset sarcoidosis: prevalence, clinical course, and treatment

Sarcoidosis is a systemic disorder of unknown cause characterized by its pathological hallmark, the non-caseating granulomas, and by variable clinical course. While most of the cases affect people aged between 25 and 40 years, approximately 30 % of cases occur in older patients. Elderly-onset sarcoidosis (EOS) is defined as the onset of sarcoidosis in people over 65 years of age. Specific studies on the incidence and prevalence of sarcoidosis in this subgroup are scarce. Several studies suggest that the clinical features of EOS differ from those of sarcoidosis in younger patients. Compared with younger patients, fatigue, uveitis and specific skin lesions are more common, while erythema nodosum and chest x-ray abnormalities are less frequent. The diagnosis of EOS is challenging and may be delayed for many months because of its insidious onset, low prevalence and similarity to other more common disorders. When there is a granulomatous reaction in the elderly, clinicians should doubt the diagnosis and first think of tuberculosis, neoplasia or rare settings such as granulomatosis with polyangiitis or granulomatous reaction due to interferon and tumour necrosis factor-α (TNFα) blockers. A minor salivary gland biopsy also has a higher accuracy for diagnosis in the elderly. The current management of EOS remains empiric because of the lack of randomized, controlled studies. However, the approach to treatment is similar, regardless of the age of the patient. The treatment may be complicated by co-morbidities and increased risk of toxicities from usual treatments, particularly steroids. This review discusses the epidemiology, clinical course, prognosis and treatment of EOS.

Clinical and radiological presentations of late-onset spondyloarthritis

The last few years have witnessed considerable progress in the diagnosis and treatment of spondyloarthritis (SpA). Tools are now available for establishing the diagnosis at an early stage, when appropriate treatment may be able to control the inflammatory process, limit the functional impairments, and improve quality of life. Late-onset SpA after the age of 50 years is uncommon. All the spondyloarthritis subgroups are represented in the elderly. Thus, late onset spondyloarthritis is underdiagnosed in favour of other inflammatory disorders that are more frequently observed in the elderly because the clinical or radiological presentations of late-onset spondyloarthritis are modified in the elderly. They deserve further attention because age population is increasing and new criteria for axial SpA including sacroiliitis detected by MRI may help the clinician with diagnosis. Specific studies evaluating the benefit/risk ratio of TNFα-blocking agents in late onset SpA patients are required.

Pattern of Young and Old Onset Rheumatoid Arthritis (YORA and EORA) Among a Group of Egyptian Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

Objective:

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) differs depending on the age of disease onset. The differences between EORA and YORA are important because they have clinical and therapeutic implications.

Method:

1185 patients were ranked after classification according to age at onset of the disease into YORA I (16–40 years), YORA II (41–60 years) and EORA >60 years. All patients groups were compared, based on disease duration, disease activity, severity parameters and drug history.

Results:

YORA I included 298 patients, 28.85% were males, with mean age of 29.4 ± 6 years and disease duration 4 ± 3.3 y, YORA II included 539 patients, 33.77% males, age 49.7 ± 6.1 y and disease duration 6.5 ± 5.6 y. EORA included 348 RA patients 40.5% males, age 67.1 ± 6.6 y, disease duration 9.95 ± 7.2 y. Activity was increased in EORA compared to YORA I and YORA II, while severity decreased in EORA. ESR, CRP and degree of anemia were higher in EORA. RF titer was higher in YORA. Small joints of the hands and feet were more involved in YORA, while, large joints in EORA.

Rheumatoid nodules were increased in YORA I than EORA P = 0.04. Polymyalgia rheumatica was exclusively present in EORA group 25 patients 7.2%.

Methotrexate was used in both YORA and EORA, with a higher mean of dosage in YORA than EORA. Multiple DMARDs in EORA was 57.9%, and biologics in 0.8% was which was significantly lower compared with YORA I, 86.3% and 1.7%, with P = 0.001.

Conclusion:

EORA has more active and less disabling and affects more males than YORA. The use of biologic therapy and combination DMARD therapy was less in EORA.