Interactions and non-interactions with ranitidine

A short course of oral ranitidine as a novel treatment for toddler's diarrhea: a parallel-group randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The current paradigm for treating toddler's diarrhea comprises dietary modification and fluid restriction. Previous studies show that probiotics and proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) or H₂ blockers could control diarrhea associated with functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs). This study aims to determine and compare the efficacy of a short course of oral ranitidine and a probiotic in the treatment of toddler's diarrhea.

METHODS

This study was a parallel-group randomized controlled trial (RCT). We sequentially enrolled 40 patients who met the eligibility criteria. We randomly assigned 20 patients to the oral ranitidine group, ten patients to the probiotic group, and ten patients to the placebo group. In the oral ranitidine group, patients received oral ranitidine (3 mg/kg/day) once daily for 10 days; in the probiotic and placebo groups, they were administered 5 to 10 billion colony-forming units (CFUs) per day of lyophilized Lactobacillus rhamnosus and 50 mg of once-daily oral vitamin C tablet respectively for 10 days. Stool frequency and consistency on the 10th day of the interventions were recorded as the primary outcomes. We used the Student's t-test to determine if there were significant differences in the mean daily stool frequencies in the three intervention groups. A p-value < 0.05 was adopted as the level of statistical significance.

RESULTS

In the ranitidine group, stool frequency decreased significantly from an average of five per day on the first day to an average of approximately one per day on the 10th day of intervention (t = 10.462, p <  0.001). Additionally, stool consistency normalized on the 10th day of intervention. In the probiotic group, there was a significant reduction in stool frequency from an average of five per day on the first day to four per day on the 10th day (t = 2.586, p = 0.041), although stool consistency remained loose. However, stool consistency and frequency were not significantly affected in the placebo group (t = 1.964, p = 0.072).

CONCLUSION

Oral ranitidine is more effective than probiotics in reducing stool frequency and normalizing stool consistency in toddler's diarrhea. We recommend multi-center trials with appropriate study designs to confirm and validate this finding.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN, ISRCTN10783996 . Registered 8 April 2016-Registered retrospectively.

Metformin and Micronutrient Status in Type 2 Diabetes: Does Polypharmacy Involving Acid-Suppressing Medications Affect Vitamin B12 Levels?

Metformin is the first-choice drug in uncomplicated type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and is effective in improving glycaemic control. It is the most widely prescribed oral antidiabetic medicine and has a good safety profile. However, there is an abundance of evidence that metformin use is associated with decreased Vitamin B12 status, though the clinical implications of this in terms of increased risk of diabetic peripheral neuropathy are debated. There is growing evidence that other B vitamins, vitamin D and magnesium may also be impacted by metformin use in addition to alterations to the composition of the microbiome, depending on the dose and duration of therapy. Patients using metformin for prolonged periods may, therefore, need initial screening with intermittent follow-up, particularly since vitamin B₁₂ deficiency has similar symptoms to diabetic neuropathy which itself affects 40-50% of patients with T2DM at some stage. Among patients with T2DM, 40% are reported to experience symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GORD), of whom 70% use oral antidiabetic medications. The most common medications used to treat GORD are proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and antagonists of histamine selective H₂ receptors (H₂RAs), both of which independently affect vitamin B₁₂ and magnesium status. Research indicates that co-prescribing metformin with either PPIs or H₂RAs can have further deleterious effects on vitamin B₁₂ status. Vitamin B12 deficiency related to metformin and polypharmacy is likely to contribute to the symptoms of diabetic neuropathy which may frequently be under-recognised. This review explores current knowledge surrounding these issues and suggests treatment strategies such as supplementation.

Effects of genetic polymorphisms on the OCT1 and OCT2-mediated uptake of ranitidine

Background

Ranitidine (Zantac^®) is a H₂-receptor antagonist commonly used for the treatment of acid-related gastrointestinal diseases. Ranitidine was reported to be a substrate of the organic cation transporters OCT1 and OCT2. The hepatic transporter OCT1 is highly genetically variable. Twelve major alleles confer partial or complete loss of OCT1 activity. The effects of these polymorphisms are highly substrate-specific and therefore difficult to predict. The renal transporter OCT2 has a common polymorphism, Ala270Ser, which was reported to affect OCT2 activity.

Aim

In this study we analyzed the effects of genetic polymorphisms in OCT1 and OCT2 on the uptake of ranitidine and on its potency to inhibit uptake of other drugs.

Methods and results

We characterized ranitidine uptake using HEK293 and CHO cells stably transfected to overexpress wild type OCT1, OCT2, or their naturally occurring allelic variants. Ranitidine was transported by wild-type OCT1 with a K_m of 62.9 μM and a v_max of 1125 pmol/min/mg protein. Alleles OCT1*5, *6, *12, and *13 completely lacked ranitidine uptake. Alleles OCT1*2, *3, *4, and *10 had v_max values decreased by more than 50%. In contrast, OCT1*8 showed an increase of v_max by 25%. The effects of OCT1 alleles on ranitidine uptake strongly correlated with the effects on morphine uptake suggesting common interaction mechanisms of both drugs with OCT1. Ranitidine inhibited the OCT1-mediated uptake of metformin and morphine at clinically relevant concentrations. The inhibitory potency for morphine uptake was affected by the OCT1*2 allele. OCT2 showed only a limited uptake of ranitidine that was not significantly affected by the Ala270Ser polymorphism.

Conclusions

We confirmed ranitidine as an OCT1 substrate and demonstrated that common genetic polymorphisms in OCT1 strongly affect ranitidine uptake and modulate ranitidine’s potential to cause drug-drug interactions. The effects of the frequent OCT1 polymorphisms on ranitidine pharmacokinetics in humans remain to be analyzed.

Pharmacological Approach to the Prevention and Treatment of Stress Ulcers

The mortality associated with bleeding stress ulcers in patients in intensive care units exceeds 50%. Iden tification of patients at risk and use of early and effec tive prophylaxis are necessary in the management of patients in intensive care units. The use of antacids is inconvenient, expensive, and associated with electro lyte disturbances and erratic pH control. H2-receptor antagonists are the preferred agents for stress ulcer pro phylaxis because of their proven efficacy, safety, and ease of administration. Adjunct therapy with cyto protective agents may be useful in patients with com promised mucosal defences.

Drug Interactions with Antiulcer Agents: Considerations in the Treatment of Acid-Peptic Disease

All of the antiulcer agents have been implicated in drug interactions. These agents generally influence the absorption, metabolism, or elimination of other medications. However, these interactions can lead to alterations in pharmacodynamic response. The mechanisms by which antiulcer agents produce drug interactions differ among the agents. It is beyond the scope of this article to review all of the drug interactions that have been reported with antiulcer agents. However, it is the intent to provide the reader with a detailed understanding of the mechanisms by which antiulcer agents may interact with other medications and to provide insight into factors that may influence the potential magnitude or clinical consequences of these interactions. An understanding of antiulcer drug interactions will aid pharmacists in assisting clinicians with drug selection and/or monitoring of drug interactions. Specifically, pharmacists can assist with the identification of potential antiulcer drug interactions and develop strategies designed to minimize adverse consequences of these interactions.

Effect of Ketoconazole and Rifampicin on the Pharmacokinetics of Ranitidine in Healthy Human Volunteers: A Possible Role of P-Glycoprotein

The aims of this study were to determine the effect of ketoconazole and rifampicin on the oral pharmacokinetics of ranitidine in human volunteers and to investigate the role of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) using in vitro systems. A randomized, placebo controlled crossover oral pharmacokinetic study was conducted in 12 healthy male human volunteers and in vitro (everted sac) and in situ (intestinal loop) studies were conducted in rats to study the role of P-gp. There was a statistically significant (p < 0.05) difference observed in the pharmacokinetic parameters C(max), AUC and MRT after pretreatment with rifampicin (600 mg orally once per day for 7 days). The C(max), AUC(0-infinity), and MRT were decreased by 53%, 52%, and 18%, respectively. Ketoconazole treatment (200 mg orally once per day for 5 days) increased the C(max), AUC(0-infinity) and T1/2 by 78%, 74%, and 56%, respectively, whereas T(max) was decreased by 31%. No statistically significant differences were observed in renal clearance (CLR) of ranitidine after treatment with either ketoconazole or rifampicin. Presence of ketoconazole significantly reduced the mean cumulative efflux concentrations (serosal to mucosal) of ranitidine to 35%, 41% and 55% in the duodenal, jejunum and ileal regions of the everted sacs, respectively, whereas, the mean cumulative efflux concentrations of ranitidine were increased by 14%, 36% and 25% in duodenal, jejunal and ileal regions of the rat small intestine, respectively, after pretreatment with rifampicin. The presence of ketoconazole improved the absorption of ranitidine significantly by increasing the percentage of total dose disappearing from the loops of duodenum, jejunum and ileum of rat small intestine by 82%, 84% and 85%, respectively. In contrast, treatment with rifampicin decreased the absorption of ranitidine by decreasing the percentage of total dose disappearing in duodenal, jejunal and ileal regions of the intestinal loops by 40%, 39% and 25%, respectively. Ranitidine was shown to be a P-gp substrate in vivo in human volunteers and it was found that oral bioavailability of ranitidine was influenced at the intestinal absorption phase.

A pharmacokinetic interaction study between omeprazole and the H2-receptor antagonist ranitidine

The effect of ranitidine pretreatment on the pharmacokinetics of omeprazole was investigated in 14 male human volunteers. Omeprazole (40 mg, gastroresistant pellets) was administered to the volunteers in a two-treatment study design, either alone or after 5 days pretreatment with b.i.d. doses of 150 mg ranitidine. Plasma concentrations of omeprazole were determined over a 24-hour period following drug administration, by a validated RP-HPLC method. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated with compartmental and non-compartmental analysis, using the computer program Kinetica (Inna Phase). In the two periods of treatments, the mean peak plasma concentrations Cmax were 730.8 ng/ml for omeprazole alone and 802.1 ng/ml for omeprazole co-administered with ranitidine (not significant). The time taken to reach the peak, Tmax, was 1.29 h and 1.42 h, respectively (not significant). The areas under the curve (AUC0-10) were 1,453.3 ng.h/ml and 1,736.8 ng.h/ml for the two periods of treatment; thus a greater AUC was obtained after pretreatment with multiple doses of ranitidine. Our data show that the pharmacokinetics of omeprazole might be inhibited by pretreatment with ranitidine; however, the clinical relevance of this interaction still has to be confirmed.

Science review: The use of proton pump inhibitors for gastric acid suppression in critical illness

Prophylaxis is routinely provided for critically ill patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) who are at high risk for stress-related mucosal damage (SRMD), an erosive process of the gastroduodenum associated with abnormally high physiological demands. Traditionally, treatment options have included sucralfate, antacids and histamine H2 receptor antagonists (H₂RAs). The H₂RAs are currently the most widely used agents in prophylactic acid suppression; however, proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) have recently replaced H₂RAs in the treatment of many acid-related conditions. PPIs achieve a more rapid and sustained increase in gastric pH and are not associated with the rapid tachyphylaxis seen with H₂RAs. As a result, and after the introduction of intravenous formulations, PPIs are beginning to be used for the prophylaxis of SRMD in critically ill adults. The high prevalence of renal and hepatic impairment among the ICU population, as well as the need for multiple drug therapy in many patients, means that pharmacokinetic characteristics and the potential for drug interactions may be important considerations in the choice of prophylactic agent. This review seeks to present the pharmacological evidence that may inform decision-making about the prescription of drugs for prophylaxis of SRMD.

Nephrotoxicity and hepatotoxicity of histamine H2 receptor antagonists

The extensive use of selective histamine H2 receptor antagonists provides a unique opportunity to describe very rare adverse drug reactions. Although mild elevation of serum creatinine level following the administration of cimetidine is relatively common, acute interstitial nephritis (AIN) is a rare hypersensitivity reaction. There have been 25 published reports of AIN associated with H2 antagonist therapy and we also identified 16 cases from the Australian Adverse Drug Reaction Advisory Committee (ADRAC) database. AIN was reported most commonly following cimetidine administration. AIN was supported by renal biopsy in 28 patients and by rechallenge in 6. H2 antagonist-induced AIN was more commonly reported in men older than 50 years. In the majority of cases the onset was within 2 weeks of initiation of therapy (1 day to 11 months). The clinical manifestations were nonspecific including sterile pyuria, elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate, fatigue, proteinuria and leucocytosis whereas rash, arthralgia and flank pain were rarely reported. There were 170 cases of hepatotoxicity following H2 antagonist administration reported to ADRAC. These were more common following ranitidine and included cholestatic, hepatocellular and mixed reactions. Hepatotoxicity was proven following liver biopsy in several cases published in the literature and in 15 cases reported to ADRAC. Hepatotoxicity recurred upon rechallenge in 6 cases. Generally, renal and hepatic adverse effects resolved quickly after cessation of H2 antagonist therapy and did not require specific treatment. Nephrotoxicity and hepatotoxicity following administration of an H2 antagonist is rare and a high index of suspicion is necessary for early detection. Now that many H2 antagonists are available over the counter, awareness of these conditions and early detection with cessation of H2 antagonist therapy would appear paramount.

Review article: drug interactions with agents used to treat acid-related diseases

Patients with acid-related diseases often need to take multiple medications. Treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection often includes either a histamine type 2 (H2)-receptor antagonist or a proton pump (H+,K(+)-ATPase) inhibitor (proton pump inhibitor), administered in conjunction with one or more antimicrobials. Also, treatment for acid-related diseases often requires extended therapy during which many concomitant medications may be administered for concurrent disease states. Polypharmacy may be the result, particularly in elderly patients, who are at increased risk for both acid-related and many other diseases. Thus, it is important to understand the potential for clinically significant drug-drug interactions in this setting. H2-receptor antagonists and proton pump inhibitors can influence the pharmacokinetic profiles of other commonly administered medications by elevating intragastric pH, which can alter drug absorption, and by interacting with the cytochrome P (CYP) 450 enzyme system, which can affect drug metabolism and clearance. Such interactions are particularly important when they affect the pharmacokinetics of drugs with narrow therapeutic ranges (e.g. warfarin, digoxin). In these cases, drug-drug interactions can result in significant toxicity and even death. There are marked differences among H2-receptor antagonists and proton pump inhibitors in their potential for such interactions. The oldest drugs in each class, cimetidine and omeprazole, respectively, have the greatest potential to alter CYP activity and change the pharmacokinetics of other drugs. The most recently developed H2-receptor antagonist, famotidine, and the newer proton pump inhibitors, rabeprazole and pantoprazole, are much less likely to induce or inhibit CYP and thereby change the metabolism of other medications. These differences are important when choosing medications for the safe treatment of patients with acid-related diseases.

Upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding in critically ill pediatric patients

Similar to adults, children under physiologic stress can develop an imbalance in defensive (mucosal layer, motility) and aggressive (gastric acid, bile salts, enzymes) factors responsible for maintaining a healthy gastrointestinal tract. Hypoxia in the gastrointestinal tract likely disrupts the defensive factors, thereby permitting damage by aggressive factors to upper gastrointestinal epithelium that may progress to stress ulceration and acute upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding (UGIB). The basic pathophysiology may be similar in children and adults; however, differences in the time to developing ulceration, ulcer location, and number of ulcers have been reported. Functional development of the gastrointestinal tract is influenced by disease, gestational and postnatal age, and exposure to and type of enteral feedings, thereby confounding the development and prophylaxis of UGIB in neonates and infants. In addition, pharmacotherapy decisions are often complicated by drug administration issues and adverse effects.

Calcium antagonists. Drug interactions of clinical significance

The interaction of calcium antagonists, including the dihydropyridine calcium antagonists (e.g. nifedipine), verapamil and diltiazem, with drugs from other classes has major clinical ramifications as the use of drug combinations increases in frequency. Combinations are used in the treatment of disorders ranging from hypertension to cardiac rhythm disturbances, angina pectoris and peripheral vasospastic disease. In this era of organ transplantation, drugs like cyclosporin are coming into potential conflict with an ever-growing list of drugs. Drug combinations used as part of long term therapies are also making their appearance in toxic drug reactions, including antituberculous and anticonvulsant agents. Bronchodilators and H2-blockers also fall into this category of potential culprits of combined drug toxicity, and the interactions of calcium antagonists with beta-blockers and antiarrhythmic agents are also becoming a matter of concern.

In-vitro potencies of histamine H2-receptor antagonists on tetraethylammonium uptake in rat renal brush-border membrane vesicles

The histamine H2 antagonists cimetidine, ranitidine and famotidine are organic bases that are cleared from the body by active renal tubular secretion involving the organic cation transporter in the proximal tubule. To determine the potential for competition for the transporter between these drugs and other drugs, their inhibitory potencies were assessed in-vitro, using rat renal brush-border membrane vesicles and tetraethylammonium as the substrate. The concentration-dependent effect of cimetidine, ranitidine and famotidine on the 15-s proton-stimulated uptake of tetraethylammonium into the membrane vesicles was studied using five different rat kidneys. The order of inhibition potencies was: cimetidine (mean IC50 = 1.07 microM) > famotidine (2.43 microM) < ranitidine (55.4 microM). The results indicate the potential for drug interactions in the kidney, especially for cimetidine and famotidine.

The influence of the H1 and H2 receptor antagonists, terfenadine and ranitidine on the hypotensive and gastric pH effects of the histamine releasing drugs, morphine and tubocurarine

Morphine and tubocurarine may release histamine by direct mast cell degranulation which may result in systemic effects such as cutaneous flushing, local wheal and flare formation and hypotension. This randomised, double-blind study examined whether preoperative combined oral terfenadine (60 mg) and ranitidine (150 mg) attenuates the reduction in blood pressure and cutaneous flushing after the administration of tubocurarine and morphine in 60 patients undergoing elective gynaecological surgery. In addition, investigation was made of whether tubocurarine and morphine cause a significant decrease in gastric pH in comparison to the nonhistamine-releasing agents fentanyl and vecuronium. Patients were randomly assigned to one of three groups receiving either pre-operative terfenadine and ranitidine and intra-operative tubocurarine and morphine (group A); pre-operative placebo and intra-operative tubocurarine and morphine (group B); pre-operative placebo and intra-operative fentanyl and vecuronium (group C). Compared to group B, group A had less hypotension and tachycardia but no significant decrease in cutaneous flushing immediately following morphine and tubocurarine (p > 0.05). There were no significant differences in haemodynamic changes between the groups A and C. In those patients not pretreated with terfenadine and ranitidine (groups B and C), gastric pH decreased between 5 and 10 min following bolus administration of morphine and tubocurarine (group B), whereas patients receiving fentanyl and vecuronium (group C) had an increase in gastric pH. This suggests that histamine release following administration of morphine and tubocurarine is sufficient to increase gastric acidity.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Effect of single-dose omeprazole and ranitidine on gastric juice acidity and volume in patients undergoing laparotomy

The effects of oral omeprazole and oral ranitidine on gastric fluid volume and pH were compared in 95 elective surgical patients, randomly assigned to one of three groups. The patients received either 80 mg of omeprazole or 300 mg of ranitidine orally at 6.00 on the morning of surgery. One third of the patients received no antacid therapy. Following induction, a no. 18 nasogastric tube was passed into the stomach and all available gastric fluid was aspirated. pH and volumes were measured. In the omeprazole- and ranitidine-treated groups, the mean pH was > 5.4 after induction, at completion of surgery and 1 h after operation, although at least one patient in both groups had pH < 2.5. The volumes of gastric aspirates were reduced equally by both drugs. Two patients in the omeprazole group, none in the ranitidine group and eight in the control group (26%) had pH < 2.5 with volume > 25 ml at induction. Both drugs appeared to be effective in reducing the volume of intragastric fluid and acidity to acceptable values.

Effect of concomitantly administered cimetidine or ranitidine on the pharmacokinetics of the 5-HT2-receptor antagonist ritanserin

The effects of concurrent administration of either cimetidine 800 mg once daily or ranitidine 300 mg once daily on the single-dose pharmacokinetics of ritanserin 10 mg were investigated in an open, randomized three-way cross-over, controlled investigation in 9 healthy volunteers. Concurrent administration of cimetidine had no significant effect on the area under the plasma concentration-time curve of ritanserin compared with control experiments. The maximum plasma concentration of ritanserin was decreased significantly (105.0 +/- 9.2 versus 125.0 +/- 13.8 ng/mL; P = .0039), whereas time to reach maximal concentration (tmax) of ritanserin was only slightly but not significantly increased, if the subjects were pretreated with cimetidine. After concurrent ingestion of ranitidine, only a trend to a decrease in the maximum plasma concentration of ritanserin was observed. Time to achieve the maximum plasma concentration, terminal half-life of elimination, and the total area under the plasma concentration-time curve of ritanserin were not altered in comparison with control experiments. The results of the study show that concurrent treatment with cimetidine 800 mg once daily or ranitidine 300 mg once daily has no apparent effect on the systemically available amount of ritanserin after a single oral dose of 10 mg. Both H2-antagonists cause a significant (cimetidine) or borderline significant (ranitidine) decrease of the maximum plasma concentration of ritanserin and a slight but not significant increase in tmax (cimetidine). These effects are of minor clinical importance and seem most likely be due to a decrease of the rate of absorption of ritanserin during concurrent administration of cimetidine/ranitidine.

Pharmacology of gastric acid inhibition

Gastric acid secretion is precisely regulated by neural (acetylcholine), hormonal (gastrin), and paracrine (histamine; somatostatin) mechanisms. The stimulatory effect of acetylcholine and gastrin is mediated via increase in cytosolic calcium, whereas that of histamine is mediated via activation of adenylate cyclase and generation of cAMP. Potentiation between histamine and either gastrin or acetylcholine may reflect postreceptor interaction between the distinct pathways and/or the ability of gastrin and acetylcholine to release histamine from mucosal ECL cells. The prime inhibitor of acid secretion is somatostatin. Its inhibitory paracrine effect is mediated predominantly by receptors coupled via guanine nucleotide binding proteins to inhibition of adenylate cyclase activity. All the pathways converge on and modulate the activity of the luminal enzyme, H+,K(+)-ATPase, the proton pump of the parietal cell. Precise information on the mechanisms involved in gastric acid secretion and the identification of specific receptor subtypes has led to the development of potent drugs capable of inhibiting acid secretion. These include competitive antagonists that interact with stimulatory receptors (e.g. muscarinic M1-receptor antagonists and histamine H2-receptor antagonists) as well as non-competitive inhibitors of H+,K(+)-ATPase (e.g. omeprazole). The histamine H2-receptor antagonists (cimetidine, ranitidine, famotidine, nizatidine and roxatidine acetate) continue as first-line therapy for peptic ulcer disease and are effective in preventing relapse. Although they are generally well tolerated, histamine H2-receptor antagonists may cause untoward CNS, cardiac and endocrine effects, as well as interfering with the absorption, metabolism and elimination of various drugs. The dominance of the histamine H2-receptor antagonists is now being challenged by omeprazole. Omeprazole reaches the parietal cell via the bloodstream, diffuses through the cytoplasm and becomes activated and trapped as a sulfenamide in the acidic canaliculus of the parietal cell. Here, it covalently binds to H+,K(+)-ATPase, the hydrogen pump of the parietal cell, thereby irreversibly blocking acid secretion in response to all modes of stimulation. The main potential drawback to its use is its extreme potency which sometimes leads to virtual anacidity, gastrin cell hyperplasia, hypergastrinaemia and, in rats, to the development of carcinoid tumours. The cholinergic receptor on the parietal cell has recently been identified as an M3 subtype and that on postganglionic intramural neurones of the submucosal plexus as an M1 subtype.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Case report of a syncopal episode associated with fluoxetine

OBJECTIVE

To report a syncopal episode associated with fluoxetine in a young, relatively healthy man.

DESIGN

Single case report.

SETTING

585-bed private hospital.

PATIENT

A 30-year-old man with hypertension, esophageal ulcers, and syncope of recent onset.

RESULTS

Fluoxetine was started six weeks prior to the syncopal episode in this patient, and is the medication most temporally associated with the event. Because the patient had a normal neurologic examination and electroencephalogram, but an abnormal electrocardiogram on admission and one month after discharge, the syncopal episode was most likely caused by cardiovascular effects of fluoxetine.

CONCLUSIONS

Fluoxetine has been reported to cause cardiac conduction abnormalities in otherwise normal individuals. Bradycardia secondary to a direct effect of fluoxetine, or to a drug interaction among fluoxetine, ranitidine, and enalapril is the most likely explanation for this patient's syncopal episode.

Ranitidine treatment and cortisol metabolism in man

Experimental evidence suggested that H2-receptor antagonists may inhibit not only hepatic but also adrenal cytochrome P-450 dependent monooxygenases. Therefore, the effects of ranitidine (150 mg b.i.d. over 14 days) on cortisol metabolism and antipyrine clearance have been investigated in nine healthy volunteers. Urinary excretion of 6 beta-hydroxycortisol (6 beta-OHC) and 17-hydroxycorticosteroids (17-OHCS) remained unaffected by ranitidine pretreatment, as did the calculated 6 beta-OHC/17-OHCS ratio. Only marginal effects were observed on antipyrine kinetics and metabolite formation. We conclude that neither adrenal production of corticosteroids nor their hepatic metabolism is affected by ranitidine administration.

Clinical implications of drug interactions with the cytochrome P-450 enzyme system associated with omeprazole

Interactions with the hepatic cytochrome P-450 microsomal enzyme system, as evidenced by statistically significant changes in pharmacokinetic parameters, have been described with some H2-receptor antagonists. Omeprazole is the first of a new class of antisecretory agents inhibiting gastric secretion by blocking hydrogen potassium ATPase. Omeprazole contains a benzimidazole moiety and thus has the potential to interact with the cytochrome P-450 enzyme group. In vitro, in vivo and human clinical studies have assessed whether such an interaction occurs, and the potential clinical consequences, in patients receiving omeprazole therapy. In vitro studies have demonstrated that omeprazole influences O-deethylation and N-demethylation in liver microsomes and the clearance and elimination half-life of antipyrine in isolated perfused liver preparations. Overall, the studies reviewed suggest that omeprazole has a differential affinity toward specific cytochrome P-450 isozymes. In vivo animal studies have demonstrated that omeprazole prolongs pentobarbital sleep times and half-life and decreases [14C]-aminopyrine elimination. Human clinical studies have not demonstrated the "all or none" effect of omeprazole on cytochrome P-450-mediated drug interactions, as is seen with cimetidine. These studies confirm in vitro findings that omeprazole is a differential inhibitor of drug metabolism: interactions have been demonstrated with the model drugs aminopyrine and antipyrine, and the therapeutic drugs diazepam, phenytoin, and warfarin but not with theophylline or propranolol. Although caution should be exercised when initiating omeprazole therapy in patients taking concomitant diazepam, warfarin, and phenytoin, clinically significant drug interactions appear unlikely.

The effects of cimetidine and ranitidine on the pharmacokinetics of cifenline

Twelve healthy subjects completed an open single dose study to evaluate the effect of co-administration of cimetidine and ranitidine on the pharmacokinetics of cifenline. Each subject received a single 160 mg dose of cifenline alone, in combination with cimetidine (300 mg four times daily), and with ranitidine (150 mg twice daily). The H2-receptor antagonists were given with breakfast 1 h prior to cifenline dosing and continuing for 48 h. Co-administration of cimetidine significantly increased Cmax (27%) and AUC (44%) and prolonged the half-life (30%) of cifenline. There were no differences in these parameters when ranitidine was co-administered with cifenline. The results of this study suggest that cimetidine, but not ranitidine, lowers the clearance of cifenline by inhibition of hepatic oxidative metabolism.

Side effects of ranitidine

Ranitidine was first marketed in 1981; since then many patients have been treated such that much experience has been accumulated on the safety of this histamine H2-receptor antagonist in the treatment of gastroduodenal disease. A wide array of ranitidine-associated side effects has been described, but infrequently. As so much information is now available, the aim of this review is to assess the weight of evidence for a causal link between ranitidine and the reported side effects. Overall, ranitidine is well tolerated. The incidence of general side effects at less than 2% is very similar to placebo. Headaches, tiredness, dizziness and mild gastrointestinal disturbance (e.g. diarrhoea, constipation and nausea) are among the most frequent complaints, but have very seldom resulted in stopping treatment. Cardiovascular side effects are extremely rare and unpredictable with the usual doses of oral ranitidine (at most 1 in 1 million patients). They mostly comprise sinusal bradycardia and atrioventricular blockade, especially after rapid intravenous administration, receding after cessation of the drug. Clinical studies, however, have not shown a significant pharmacological effect of ranitidine on the cardiovascular system via H2-receptors, even though individual sensitivities cannot be ruled out in a few isolated reports. Ranitidine is unlikely to be directly hepatotoxic: a transient change in liver function tests has been noted in only 1 in 100 to 1 in 1000 patients. Several cases of mixed hepatitis have been reported, but very few were fully documented. The incidence of ranitidine-associated acute hepatitis has been estimated to be less than 1 in 100,000 patients. Neuropsychiatric complications may be less common and clinically quite similar to those reported with cimetidine, i.e. confusion, disorientation, hallucinations, delirium. These side effects have occurred especially in critically ill and multiple-therapy patients, or patients with chronic renal or hepatic failure, so that the direct causal link with ranitidine treatment was often difficult to ascertain. Even though an H2-receptor-mediated effect is an attractive hypothesis (since similar complications were noted with other H2-receptor antagonists), other mechanisms have been suggested to play a role, e.g. cholinergic or histaminic effects. The overall incidence of neuropsychiatric complications is probably markedly less than 1%. White cell injury (i.e. agranulocytosis) appears to be the most frequent haematological complication, even though case reports are very few and poorly documented.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Effect of H2-receptor antagonists on the pharmacokinetics of 5-fluorouracil in the rat and monkey

The effect of short term (7 days) and long term (28 days) pretreatment with the imidazole H2-receptor antagonist, cimetidine (CMT), on the pharmacokinetics of 5-fluorouracil (5-FUra) has been studied in the rat and cynomolgus monkey. Short-term pretreatment of rats with CMT significantly increased t1/2.z by 29 per cent and AUC by 40 per cent: total body clearance was decreased by 30 per cent. Long-term pretreatment exaggerated these effects. By contrast, short- and long-term pretreatment with the furan H2-receptor antagonist, ranitidine, caused no significant effect on 5-FUra kinetics. In the monkey, 7 days pretreatment with CMT increased t1/2.z by 32 per cent leaving other 5-FUra kinetic parameters unchanged; 28 days pretreatment increased both t1/2.z by 41 per cent and AUC by 100 per cent with a decrease in total body clearance of 5-FUra of 48 per cent. CMT, but not RNT, inhibited cytosolic dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), the enzyme responsible for 5-FUra catabolism. It is proposed that the observed effects of CMT on 5-FUra kinetics are the result of inhibition of DPD. This interaction has the potential for increasing systemic drug toxicity and it is therefore advisable that where H2-receptor blockade is administered concurrently with 5-FUra that a non-imidazole based H2-receptor antagonist such as RNT should be substituted for CMT.

Effects of famotidine and cimetidine on plasma levels of epidurally administered lignocaine

The effects of two H2-receptor antagonists, famotidine and cimetidine, on the plasma levels of epidurally administered lignocaine were studied. Group A (n = 20) received famotidine 20 mg orally the night before surgery and 20 mg intramuscularly 60 minutes before induction of anaesthesia. Group B (n = 15) received cimetidine 200 mg orally the night before the surgery and 400 mg orally 60 minutes before the anaesthetic induction. Group C (n = 20) received neither famotidine nor cimetidine and served as controls. Twelve millilitres of 2.0% lignocaine with adrenaline 1:200,000 was injected into the epidural space in all patients, after the establishment of general anaesthesia with nitrous oxide, oxygen, and enflurane (0.3-0.5%). The patients who received cimetidine showed significantly higher plasma concentrations of lignocaine compared with either group A or group C at all investigation times (p less than 0.01). The mean peak plasma concentrations were 2.4 (SEM 0.1), 3.2 (SEM 0.2) and 2.3 (SEM 0.1) micrograms/ml in group A, B, and C, respectively. This study suggests that famotidine is preferable to cimetidine for control of gastric acidity before the use of lignocaine as the epidural anaesthetic.

Interaction of tertatolol with rifampicin and ranitidine pharmacokinetics and antihypertensive activity

The interaction of the new beta-receptor antagonist tertatolol with rifampicin and ranitidine was investigated in ten patients with arterial hypertension (WHO stages I-II). They were treated orally with a single dose of tertatolol 5 mg alone and, after randomized allocation, with ranitidine 150 mg twice daily or rifampicin 600 mg once daily for 1 week each (tertatolol 5 mg was concurrently administered on the seventh day of the treatment phases). Following each therapeutic phase, circadian blood pressure values as well as kinetic parameters were obtained. On treatment with tertatolol alone, maximum plasma concentrations were 123.7 +/- 32.4 ng/ml (mean +/- SD) and were reached after 1.95 +/- 1.77 hours. The tertatolol elimination half-life was 9.0 +/- 7.1 hours. Coadministration of ranitidine did not significantly alter the kinetic parameters and antihypertensive effect of tertatolol. Rifampicin, however, decreased the maximum plasma levels of tertatolol to 80.6 +/- 18.5 ng/ml and markedly shortened the elimination half-life to 3.4 +/- 2.6 hours (p less than 0.01 compared with tertatolol alone). Urinary excretion of parent tertatolol and unchanged 4-hydroxy tertatolol was decreased under rifampicin, and a tendency to a reduction in the effect of tertatolol on circadian blood pressure values was observed. Twenty-four hours after administration, the heart rate in those patients on tertatolol alone (68 +/- 6 beats/min) was lower than in those on tertatolol plus rifampicin (74 +/- 7 beats/min). In conclusion, a pronounced pharmacokinetic interaction, with a limited consequence in terms of pharmacodynamic effects, was found in the present study when tertatolol was administered with rifampicin, but not with ranitidine.

Effect of cimetidine and ranitidine on the hepatic and renal elimination of nicotine in humans

In a randomized, double-blind, cross-over experiment, 6 healthy consenting male subjects were administered cimetidine 600 mg or ranitidine 300 mg or placebo p.o. q12h x 2 days. Nicotine bitartrate was administered i.v. on day 2 (1 microgram/kg/min) x 30 min. After cimetidine mean nicotine total and metabolic clearances were decreased by 30% and 27% while after ranitidine the clearances were decreased by 10% and 7% respectively. Since smokers regulate their smoke intake based in large part on their nicotine blood levels these results suggest that the diminished nicotine total clearance in the presence of cimetidine could be important in assisting smoking reduction or cessation.

Influence of ranitidine, pirenzepine, and aluminum magnesium hydroxide on the bioavailability of various antibiotics, including amoxicillin, cephalexin, doxycycline, and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid

Two randomized double-blind crossover studies and one randomized crossover study were performed to document possible drug-drug interactions between antacids (aluminum magnesium hydroxide, 10 ml per dose for 10 doses), antimuscarinic drugs (pirenzepine, 50 mg per dose for 4 doses), and H2-blockers (ranitidine, 150 mg per dose for 3 doses) and amoxicillin (1,000 mg), cephalexin (1,000 mg), doxycycline (200 mg), and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (625 mg). Ten healthy volunteers participated in each study. Concentrations in serum and urine were measured by bioassay, and pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by the usual open one- or two-compartment models (statistics were determined by the Wilcoxon test). The antacid, pirenzepine, and ranitidine had no influence on the bioavailability of amoxicillin, cephalexin, and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid. Only small differences could be observed in the pharmacokinetic parameters, but they are not of therapeutic importance. However, the antacid caused a significant (P less than 0.01) reduction in the gastrointestinal absorption of doxycycline (area under the concentration-time curve, 38.6 +/- 22.7 mg.h/liter, fasting; 6.0 +/- 3.2 mg.h/liter, with antacid), resulting in subtherapeutic levels of doxycycline.

Do all histamine2-antagonists cause a warfarin drug interaction?

Cimetidine, the first marketed histamine2-receptor antagonist, has been shown to decrease the clearance of warfarin consistently through inhibition of cytochrome P-450 metabolism. The clinical significance of this drug-drug interaction has been questioned due to: (1) the lowering of the warfarin therapeutic range, (2) the lowering of the total daily therapeutic cimetidine dosage, (3) the advent of once-daily cimetidine dosing, and (4) the demonstration that the clearance of the less active warfarin R-enantiomer is decreased to a greater extent than the more active S-enantiomer. Ranitidine has been implicated in both increasing and decreasing warfarin's hypoprothrombinemic-effect (noted in the warfarin package insert), despite the majority of investigations demonstrating no warfarin clearance changes. Careful examination of the implicating data indicates that the majority of the warfarin pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic variance that occurs with combined ranitidine-warfarin therapy cannot be attributed to a drug-drug interaction. No data are available to implicate the newer histamine2-antagonists, famotidine and nizatidine, in causing a decrease in warfarin metabolism.

Kinetics of oral and intravenous mexiletine: lack of effect of cimetidine and ranitidine

The pharmacokinetics of mexiletine, a Class I antiarrhythmic drug, was investigated in 6 healthy volunteers after single oral doses and 15 min intravenous infusions of 3 mg/kg. Cimetidine and ranitidine are commonly used H2-receptor antagonists, which interact adversely with many drugs, e.g. inhibition of the metabolism of Class I antiarrhythmics such as lidocaine and quinidine by cimetidine. To investigate the effects of the two drugs on the kinetics of mexiletine, cimetidine 800 mg.day-1 or ranitidine 600 mg.day-1 were administered orally for one week. Neither H2-receptor antagonist altered the distribution and elimination of mexiletine, nor did they affect its overall kinetics, or excretion of the metabolites para- and 4-OH-methylmexiletine after oral and intravenous administration of mexiletine.

Negative effects of famotidine on cardiac performance assessed by noninvasive hemodynamic measurements

In a randomized placebo-controlled study 12 healthy volunteers were treated for 1 wk each with 10 mg of nifedipine four times daily plus placebo or the same dose of nifedipine concurrently with 40 mg of famotidine once a day. Famotidine did not significantly alter pharmacokinetic parameters of nifedipine. Determination of systolic time intervals showed that the preejection period and the ratio of the preejection period and the left ventricular ejection time were significantly reduced by administration of nifedipine plus placebo. Coadministration of famotidine and nifedipine, however, led to a significant increase of these parameters. In an additional double-blind study, a significant rise of the preejection period and of the ratio was detected after administration of famotidine alone. In impedance cardiography stroke volume and cardiac output were significantly reduced by famotidine. Heart rate and blood pressure values were not altered by the H2-antagonist. For the first time, to our knowledge, the observed changes of hemodynamic parameters appear to indicate that famotidine may exert negative effects on cardiac performance which, in our opinion, could be of clinical relevance in elderly subjects or in patients with heart failure.

Ranitidine. An updated review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic use in peptic ulcer disease and other allied diseases

Ranitidine, a histamine H2-receptor antagonist, is now well established as a potent inhibitor of gastric acid secretion effective in the treatment and prophylaxis of gastrointestinal lesions aggravated by gastric acid secretion. Therapeutic trials involving several thousands of patients with peptic ulcer disease confirm that ranitidine 300mg daily administered orally in single or divided doses is at least as effective as cimetidine 800 to 1000mg daily in increasing the rate of healing of duodenal and gastric ulcers. Similar dosages of ranitidine have been shown to relieve the symptoms of reflux oesophagitis and heal or prevent gastrointestinal damage caused by ulcerogenic drugs. Ranitidine 150mg orally at night maintains ulcer healing in the long term. Ranitidine has also demonstrated good results in the treatment of Zollinger-Ellison syndrome and in the prevention of aspiration pneumonitis when given prior to surgery and to pregnant women at full term. It may also have a place in the management of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding and in the prevention of stress ulcers in the intensive care setting, although these areas require further investigation. Ranitidine has been used safely in obstetric patients during labour, in children, the elderly, and in patients with renal impairment when given in appropriate dosages. The drug is very well tolerated and is only infrequently associated with serious adverse reactions or clinically significant drug interactions. Even at high dosages, ranitidine appears devoid of antiandrogenic effects. Ranitidine is clearly comparable or superior to most other antiulcer agents in the treatment and prevention of a variety of gastrointestinal disorders associated with gastric acid secretion. With its favourable efficacy and tolerability profiles, ranitidine must be considered a first-line agent when suppression of gastric acid secretion is indicated.

Cimetidine and ranitidine do not affect enflurane metabolism in surgical patients

Hepatic cytochrome-P-450-linked microsomal metabolism is inhibited by cimetidine, and to a lesser extent by ranitidine. Such an inhibition might protect against the metabolite-related toxicity of inhalation anesthetics. However, in comparison with the values measured in a control group, neither cimetidine (600 mg p.o. + 200 mg i.m.) nor ranitidine (150 mg p.o. + 50 mg i.m.), both administered 11-12 h before anesthesia, inhibited enflurane metabolism as assessed by the increase in plasma inorganic fluoride concentration and urinary fluoride excretion in 21 ASA I patients anesthetized with enflurane (end-tidal concentration 0.5 +/- 0.05% for 2-6 h). The inorganic fluoride concentration in the gastric juice remained low in all groups.

Possible interaction of ranitidine with phenytoin

Clinical and animal studies have shown that cimetidine and ranitidine can inhibit hepatic cytochrome P-450-mediated metabolism of a variety of other drugs. This occurs to a lesser extent with ranitidine than with cimetidine at doses commonly used to treat gastric acid-related disorders. We recently observed a 66-year-old man whose steady-state serum phenytoin concentration increased 40 percent during one month after the addition to his regimen of ranitidine 150 mg bid. Because the ranitidine had been prescribed postsurgically for prophylaxis, it was discontinued and the patient's serum phenytoin concentration declined to the previous steady-state level with no change in dose or other drug therapy. This case indicates that the serum phenytoin concentration should be monitored for the first month after the addition of ranitidine to the regimens of patients on chronic phenytoin therapy. As well, further clinical investigation of factors affecting the interindividual inhibitory action of ranitidine is warranted.

Haematological adverse effects of histamine H2-receptor antagonists

Histamine H2-receptor antagonists are widely used in the treatment of gastrointestinal diseases related to gastric acid hypersecretion. Cimetidine was introduced into medical practice in 1976 and ranitidine, famotidine and nizatidine in 1981, 1985 and 1987, respectively. Haematological adverse effects are relatively uncommon and most have been reported in cases of cimetidine administration. These adverse effects are reviewed under 4 main headings: (a) blood cytopenias and leucocytosis; (b) coagulation disorders related to drug interactions with oral anticoagulants; (c) reduction of dietary iron absorption; and (d) reduction of dietary cobalamin absorption. 85 reported cases of blood cytopenias attributed to these drugs are reviewed, of which 75 (88%) were associated with cimetidine therapy. In postmarketing surveillance studies, the incidence of cimetidine-associated blood cytopenia has been evaluated at about 2.3 per 100,000 patients. Neutropenia and agranulocytosis are by far the most frequently encountered. Whatever the drug or the type of cytopenia, this adverse effect is almost always rapidly reversible when treatment is stopped. Moreover, in several cases other factors such as underlying diseases or additional drugs could have been responsible, at least partly, for the cytopenia. The pathophysiological basis of these adverse effects remains poorly explained. Various mechanisms have been proposed, which in some cases are probably associated: (a) direct toxicity for haemopoietic stem cells; (b) drug-induced immune reactions leading to blood or bone marrow cell damage, and (c) drug interactions, with increased and prolonged action of potentially haematotoxic drugs. Mechanisms (a) and (c) appear to be of particular clinical importance in cases of impaired renal elimination of H2-receptor antagonists. Cimetidine and probably to a lesser extent ranitidine potentiate the action of oral anticoagulants of both coumarin and indanedione structure. This may result in haemorrhagic complications. Such action is a consequence of the reduced hepatic metabolism of oral anticoagulants through a dose-dependent, reversible inhibition of cytochrome P450. Malabsorption of dietary iron and cobalamin appears to result from inhibition of gastric secretion by the H2-receptor antagonists. This is of no clinical importance in short term treatment, but long term use of H2-receptor antagonists may theoretically contribute to the occurrence of iron or cobalamin deficiency anaemia.

First-degree atrioventricular block in a young duodenal ulcer patient treated with a standard oral dose of ranitidine

A 20-year-old male patient on oral treatment with ranitidine 300 mg/day in a single bedtime dose was admitted to hospital for a brief episode of syncope which had occurred 20 min earlier. All clinical, laboratory and instrumental examinations yielded negative findings, except for electrocardiographic evidence of first-degree atrioventricular block. Administration of atropine produced transient disappearance of the block, which disappeared altogether after discontinuing ranitidine treatment. Two separate rechallenges with ranitidine each produced recurrence of (asymptomatic) first-degree atrioventricular block at electrocardiographic examination, but oral treatment with cimetidine (400-800 mg/day) and famotidine (40-80 mg/day) induced no electrocardiographic abnormalities. The hypothesis that this patient may be abnormally susceptible to the cholinergic or cholinergic-like effect of ranitidine, a side effect unrelated to the drug's primary H2-blocking action, would appear to be consistent with evidence of an increased vagal tone of the atrioventricular node as revealed by atrial pacing. However, the ability of ranitidine to release histamine in man and the potential dysrhythmia-inducing effect of histamine should also be taken into consideration.

Influence of nitrendipine and verapamil on plasma levels, urinary excretion, and beta-blocking effect of metoprolol

Following randomized allocation eight healthy volunteers were treated for 1 week each with metoprolol alone (100 mg twice daily), verapamil 80 mg three times a day plus metoprolol 100 mg twice daily, and with nitrendipine 20 mg twice daily. Plasma levels and urinary recovery of the beta-blocker, antipyrine clearance, and heart rate on exercise were measured. Verapamil and nitrendipine slightly prolonged elimination half-life of metoprolol. The urinary recovery of the parent beta-blocker and of its alpha-hydroxy metabolite was elevated by both calcium antagonists (verapamil and nitrendipine). Exercise tachycardia (150 beats/min without drugs) was inhibited more pronounced on the combination therapies than under metoprolol administration alone. Results of the present study indicate that calcium antagonists enhance inhibition of exercise tachycardia caused by metoprolol, possibly due to their binding to myocardial beta-adrenergic receptors which is known from the literature. As both calcium antagonists did not increase plasma levels of metoprolol, in the present study a kinetic interaction between the beta-blocker and the calcium channel blockers investigated does not appear to be responsible for the pharmacodynamic effects observed.

The influence of ranitidine on the pharmacokinetics and toxicity of doxorubicin in rabbits

The influence of ranitidine on the pharmacokinetics and toxicity of doxorubicin was studied in six female New Zealand white rabbits. Plasma pharmacokinetic data were first obtained from rabbits given 3 mg/kg doxorubicin. After 1 month, the same rabbits were treated with ranitidine, 2.5 mg/kg or 25 mg/kg, before and during doxorubicin administration. The plasma doxorubicin assays to determine pharmacokinetic parameters were repeated. Drug toxicity was evaluated using complete blood counts, and hepatic function was measured using a 14C-aminopyrine breath test. High-dose ranitidine increased the total exposure to doxorubicin (area under the curve of doxorubicin alone = 1.44 +/- 0.88 microM.h/ml vs 4.49 +/- 2.35 microM.hr/ml for doxorubicin given with high-dose ranitidine; P = 0.06). Low-dose ranitidine did not alter doxorubicin pharmacokinetics. Exposure to doxorubicinol was altered by either high-dose or low-dose ranitidine. 14C-Aminopyrine half-life was altered by a ranitidine dose of 25 mg/kg (aminopyrine half-life after placebo control = 97 +/- 6 min as against aminopyrine half-life after ranitidine = 121 +/- 7 min; mean +/- SEM; P less than 0.02). Low-dose ranitidine did not exacerbate doxorubicin-induced myelosuppression. High-dose ranitidine enhanced doxorubicin-induced erythroid suppression while sparing the myeloid series. At cytochrome P-450-inhibitory doses, ranitidine's effects upon doxorubicin plasma pharmacokinetics are similar to those previously seen with cimetidine. These changes did not appear to alter drug detoxification and are not related to microsomal inhibition of doxorubicin detoxification. Low doses of ranitidine do not alter doxorubicin plasma pharmacokinetics or toxicity in rabbits.

The use of a synthetic prostaglandin E1 analogue (misoprostol) as an adjunct to pancreatic enzyme replacement in cystic fibrosis

Eleven cystic fibrosis children (mean age, 9.6 years) were chosen at random to participate in a study to observe the effects of concurrently stimulating gastric/duodenal bicarbonate secretion and inhibiting gastric acid secretion, using a methylated prostaglandin E1 analogue in patients with pancreatic insufficiency and taking pancreatic enzymes. Percentage fat absorption in 3-day stool collections were calculated before and after commencing therapy with misoprostol, 400 micrograms/day in divided doses. We found a significant reduction in fat output (14.7 +/- 11.7 versus 7.5 +/- 3.5 g/day, p less than 0.05) in the study group as a whole and a significant reduction in steatorrhoeic level as a percentage of fat intake in all of the patients with abnormal base-line collections (23.1% versus 9.2%, p less than 0.002). We conclude that misoprostol should be considered in cystic fibrosis patients with steatorrhoea as a means of improving nutrient absorption.

Ranitidine pharmacokinetics in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis

Ranitidine kinetics in renal failure were evaluated in six patients undergoing continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). On separate occasions each patient received either 50 mg intravenously (i.v.) or 150 mg orally of ranitidine HCl. Following i.v. administration, the plasma concentration vs time curve was best described by a two compartment model with firstorder elimination. The mean +/- SD distribution and elimination rate constants were 2.47 +/- 0.78 and 0.098 +/- 0.013 h, respectively. The area under the serum concentration vs time curve after the i.v. dose was 5979 +/- 2870 micrograms X h X l-1, resulting in a mean volume of distribution of 76.8 l and a total body clearance of 126 ml X min-1. Following oral administration the observed maximum plasma concentration was 904 +/- 483 micrograms X l-1 at 4.2 +/- 1.8 h, and the bioavailability was 69.7 +/- 35.6%. The peritoneal clearance of ranitidine was 3.2 +/- 0.7 and 2.6 +/- 0.6 ml X min-1 for the i.v. and oral groups, respectively. The amount of drug removed by dialysis was 561.2 +/- 336.2 micrograms for the i.v. and 1197.1 +/- 602.3 micrograms for the oral group. Four patients in the i.v. group had urine output during the study period with renal ranitidine clearance values of 9.9 +/- 9.9 ml X min-1. Two patients in the oral group had urine output and corresponding renal ranitidine clearance values of 5.1 and 20.1 ml X min-1. A dosage regimen for ranitidine is proposed based on ranitidine kinetics in patients undergoing CAPD.

The efficacy of ranitidine in children

The effect of preoperative oral ranitidine on intragastric pH and volume of aspirate was evaluated in anaesthetized children. Five groups of eight randomly assigned children were evaluated. The first group acted as control and the other groups received 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5 mg kg-1 ranitidine, respectively. The drug was administered 1-4 h preoperatively. The intragastric pH was measured by a pH electrode through an orogastric tube, and the volume of aspirate was recorded every hour. At the time of first measurement oral ranitidine was significantly effective (P less than 0.001) in increasing the pH of intragastric contents to above the safe level of 2.5 in 94% of the children. At the second measurement an hour later, it was effective in all the children. Ranitidine has no significant effect on the volume of gastric aspirate and also there was no significant difference in the effect on the pH of the various doses of ranitidine studied. Oral ranitidine at doses of 2-3.5 mg kg-1 is effective in decreasing gastric acidity in children.

Factors affecting the pharmacokinetics of nifedipine

The plasma pharmacokinetics of nifedipine and the formation of its metabolites have been studied in volunteers under conditions which would affect the activity of the cytochrome P-450 system. The pharmacokinetics of a 10-mg capsule of nifedipine were not significantly different between smokers and non-smokers of similar age. After pretreatment with cimetidine, which inhibits the activity of cytochrome P-450, the peak plasma concentration and area under the plasma-time concentration curve for nifedipine were increased by a mean 84%. In contrast, pre-treatment with ranitidine which has little effect on cytochrome P-450, did not significantly alter nifedipine pharmacokinetics. Smoking does not contribute significantly to the variability in nifedipine pharmacokinetics. However, the interaction between nifedipine and cimetidine, but not ranitidine, may be of clinical importance.

Comparative effects of ranitidine and cimetidine on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of warfarin in man

Stereochemical aspects of the potential interaction between the oral anticoagulant warfarin and the H2-antagonists, cimetidine and ranitidine, were investigated. A single 25 mg oral dose of racemic warfarin was administered on Day 4 of a randomised 9-day multiple dosing regimen of either cimetidine (800 mg o.d.) ranitidine (300 mg o.d.) or placebo. The degree of anticoagulation produced by warfarin was quantificated by the determination of both the prothrombin and Factor VII clotting times. Ranitidine had no effect on the pharmacodynamics of warfarin or the pharmacokinetics of the individual warfarin enantiomers. Cimetidine whilst producing no statistically significant change in the pharmacodynamics of warfarin or in the pharmacokinetics of the pharmacologically more potent (S) enantiomer, did produce a statistically significant decrease in the clearance of the (R) enantiomer, possibly due to metabolic inhibition of this species.