Clearance of the antihistamine doxylamine. Reduced in elderly men but not in elderly women

A simple and sensitive LC-MS/MS method for determination of doxylamine in human plasma and its application in a bioequivalence study in healthy Chinese volunteers

A simple, rapid, sensitive and specific LC-MS/MS method was developed and validated for the quantitative determination of doxylamine in human plasma, using isotope doxylamine-d5 as internal standard (IS). The detection was conducted on a QTRAP 5500 tandem mass spectrometer coupled with electrospray ionization (ESI) source in positive ion mode. Quantification was achieved by positive electrospray ionization containing multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) transitions of m/z 271.0→182.0 for doxylamine and m/z 276.2→187.3 for IS. The mobile phase A was methanol, and mobile phase B was 20 mM ammonium acetate (0.2 % formic acid) in water, using a gradient elution procedure at a flow rate of 0.6 mL/min. The method was validated with a sensitivity of 0.500 ng/mL and a linear concentration range of 0.500-200 ng/mL. The inter-batch precision (%CV) was less than 5.4 %, and the accuracy deviation (%RE) ranged from - 10.6 % to 3.7 %; the inter-batch precision (%CV) was less than 6.6 %, and the accuracy deviation (%RE) was ranged from - 2.7 % to 0.1 %. The selectivity, sensitivity, extraction recovery, matrix effect, carryover, dilution reliability, stability and other characteristics were within the acceptable range. This validated method was successfully applied to a bioequivalence study that orally administered 25 mg of doxylamine succinate tablets in 60 healthy Chinese volunteers.

The Expanding Role of Pyridine and Dihydropyridine Scaffolds in Drug Design

Pyridine-based ring systems are one of the most extensively used heterocycles in the field of drug design, primarily due to their profound effect on pharmacological activity, which has led to the discovery of numerous broad-spectrum therapeutic agents. In the US FDA database, there are 95 approved pharmaceuticals that stem from pyridine or dihydropyridine, including isoniazid and ethionamide (tuberculosis), delavirdine (HIV/AIDS), abiraterone acetate (prostate cancer), tacrine (Alzheimer's), ciclopirox (ringworm and athlete's foot), crizotinib (cancer), nifedipine (Raynaud's syndrome and premature birth), piroxicam (NSAID for arthritis), nilvadipine (hypertension), roflumilast (COPD), pyridostigmine (myasthenia gravis), and many more. Their remarkable therapeutic applications have encouraged researchers to prepare a larger number of biologically active compounds decorated with pyridine or dihydropyridine, expandeing the scope of finding a cure for other ailments. It is thus anticipated that myriad new pharmaceuticals containing the two heterocycles will be available in the forthcoming decade. This review examines the prospects of highly potent bioactive molecules to emphasize the advantages of using pyridine and dihydropyridine in drug design. We cover the most recent developments from 2010 to date, highlighting the ever-expanding role of both scaffolds in the field of medicinal chemistry and drug development.

Efficacy of Triprolidine in the Treatment of Temporary Sleep Disturbance

Triprolidine, a first-generation antihistamine for allergic rhinitis, has a shorter half-life and fewer persistent effects relative to other antihistamines and may be useful in the treatment of temporary sleep disturbance. Patients aged ≥18 years old were randomized 1:1:1 to receive either triprolidine 2.5 mg (n = 65), triprolidine 5 mg (n = 66), or placebo (n = 67) on 3 consecutive nights. Sleep disturbance index was monitored via wrist actimeter. Subjective measures were assessed via diary card. Triprolidine 2.5 mg had a significantly lower sleep disturbance index versus placebo on night 1 (P = .02); however, when adjusted for outliers, sleep disturbance index did not significantly differ between either dose of triprolidine versus placebo on night 1. Adjusted sleep disturbance index was significantly lower with triprolidine 2.5 and 5 mg versus placebo on night 3 (P = .0017 and P = .011, respectively) and for the mean of all 3 nights (P = .01 and P = .015, respectively). Sleep latency was significantly improved for triprolidine 2.5 mg versus placebo on nights 2 and 3 and for the mean of all 3 nights and for triprolidine 5 mg versus placebo for the mean of all 3 nights. Subjective measures showed those on both doses of triprolidine felt more refreshed on awakening versus placebo for the mean of all 3 nights, with no increase in daytime sleepiness. The frequency of adverse events was similar across groups. The optimum dose of triprolidine for treatment of temporary sleep disturbance was 2.5 mg. There were improvements in both objective and subjective measures of sleep quality versus placebo, with no safety concerns raised.

Antihistamine-related deaths in England: Are the high safety profiles of antihistamines leading to their unsafe use?

AIMS

Antihistamines are routinely taken to control allergic reactions or sedation to induce sleep. There are, however, growing concerns regarding sedating antihistamine misuse. This research aims to evaluate deaths related to antihistamines in England occurring during 2000-2019.

METHODS

Cases reported to the National Programme on Substance Abuse Deaths from England occurring in 2000-2019 with antihistamine detections at postmortem were extracted for analysis.

RESULTS

In total, 1666 antihistamine postmortem detections were identified from 1537 cases. Sedating antihistamines available for purchase under pharmacist supervision but without need for a prescription (pharmacy-only medications) were present in a significant majority of cases (85.2%, P < .01). Despite an increasing trend for antihistamine-related deaths over time, the proportion of deaths where an antihistamine was implicated declined over the same period. Specific concerns with regards to the misuse of these pharmacy-only sedating antihistamines are raised with regards to the significant proportion of cases that were concluded as suicide (20.9%, P < .01), and the high prevalence of their use in combination with other central nervous system depressants (94.8% of cases).

CONCLUSION

This is the first report in over 40 years regarding antihistamine-related mortality from England. The rising trend in sedating antihistamine-related deaths may be contributed to by their increasing availability and the perceived negligible dangers associated with antihistamines, both from the general public and learned professionals. Awareness of the dangerous sedative properties that some antihistamines possess is, however, heightened in individuals deliberately seeking these effects. Urgent review of sedating antihistamines currently assigned under the pharmacy-only classification is needed to achieve antihistamine harm reduction.

Bioavailability of Triprolidine as a Single Agent or in Combination With Pseudoephedrine: A Randomized, Open-Label Crossover Study in Healthy Volunteers

Antihistamines have been in clinical use for more than 70 years to treat allergic and nonallergic symptoms including relief from cold and flu symptoms. Despite their widespread use, pharmacokinetic (PK) data are sparse for older, first-generation antihistamines. This phase 1 single-center open-label, randomized, single-dose, 3-way crossover trial evaluated the PK profiles of 2 doses of film-coated triprolidine caplets (2.5 and 5 mg) compared with a reference combination tablet (triprolidine 2.5 mg + pseudoephedrine 60 mg) in 24 healthy adults. Blood samples were collected predose and at specified intervals across a 24-hour period after administration, and triprolidine was quantified using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Maximum plasma concentration of triprolidine for the 2.5 mg and dose-normalized 5 mg single-agent tablets were comparable (8.4 versus 7.1 ng/mL, respectively) and higher for the combination tablet (9.5 ng/mL). PK parameters, including time to maximum plasma concentration (∼1.5 hours) and elimination half-life (∼4 hours), were comparable between the 3 treatment arms. The safety profile of this sedating antihistamine was as expected; however, adverse effects were reported in a markedly higher proportion of women than men. There were no significant sex differences in any of the measured PK parameters.

Analysis of the variability of the pharmacokinetics of multiple drugs in young adult and elderly subjects and its implications for acceptable daily exposures and cleaning validation limits

The elderly constitute a significant, potentially sensitive, subpopulation within the general population, which must be taken into account when performing risk assessments including determining an acceptable daily exposure (ADE) for the purpose of a cleaning validation. Known differences in the pharmacokinetics of drugs between young adults (who are typically the subjects recruited into clinical trials) and the elderly are potential contributors affecting the interindividual uncertainty factor (UF_H) component of the ADE calculation. The UF_H values were calculated for 206 drugs for young adult and elderly groups separately and combined (with the elderly assumed to be a sensitive subpopulation) from published studies where the pharmacokinetics of the young adult and elderly groups were directly compared. Based on the analysis presented here, it is recommended to use a default UF_H value of 10 for worker populations (which are assumed to be approximately equivalent to the young adult groups) where no supporting pharmacokinetic data exist, while it is recommended to use a default UF_H value of 15 for the general population, to take the elderly into consideration when calculating ADE values. The underlying reasons for the large differences between the exposures in the young adult and elderly subjects for the 10 compounds which show the greatest separation are different in almost every case, involving the OCT2 transporter, glucuronidation, hydrolysis, CYP1A2, CYP2A6, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP3A4 or CYP3A5. Therefore, there is no consistent underlying mechanism which appears responsible for the largest differences in pharmacokinetic parameters between young adult and elderly subjects.

Over-the-Counter Agents for the Treatment of Occasional Disturbed Sleep or Transient Insomnia: A Systematic Review of Efficacy and Safety

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the level of evidence supporting the use of common over-the-counter (OTC) agents (diphenhydramine, doxylamine, melatonin, and valerian) for occasional disturbed sleep or insomnia.

DATA SOURCES

A systematic review of the literature was conducted on July 31, 2014, using MEDLINE (PubMed) and the search terms (insomnia OR sleep) AND (over*the*counter OR OTC OR non*prescription OR antihistamine OR doxylamine OR diphenhydramine OR melatonin OR valerian) with the filters English, human, and clinical trials.

STUDY SELECTION

Identified publications (from 2003 to July 31, 2014, following previous published literature reviews) that met the inclusion criteria were selected. The criteria included randomized placebo-controlled clinical studies that utilized overnight objective (polysomnography) or next-day participant-reported sleep-related endpoints and that were conducted in healthy participants with or without occasional disturbed sleep or diagnosed insomnia.

RESULTS

Measures of efficacy and tolerability were summarized for each study individually and grouped according to OTC agent: H1 antagonists or antihistamines (3 studies, diphenhydramine), melatonin (8), and valerian or valerian/hops (7). Of the 3 sleep agents, studies conducted with melatonin, especially prolonged-release formulations in older individuals with diagnosed insomnia, demonstrated the most consistent beneficial effects (vs placebo) on sleep measures, specifically sleep onset and sleep quality, with favorable tolerability. In contrast, the clinical trial data for diphenhydramine, immediate-release melatonin, and valerian suggested limited beneficial effects.

CONCLUSIONS

A review of randomized controlled studies over the past 12 years suggests commonly used OTC sleep-aid agents, especially diphenhydamine and valerian, lack robust clinical evidence supporting efficacy and safety.

Pharmacokinetic dose proportionality between two strengths (12.5 mg and 25 mg) of doxylamine hydrogen succinate film-coated tablets in fasting state: a single-dose, randomized, two-period crossover study in healthy volunteers

Background

Doxylamine succinate, an ethanolamine-based antihistamine, is used in the short-term management of insomnia because of its sedative effects. No data on the dose proportionality of the pharmacokinetics of doxylamine are available, although this drug has been marketed in European countries for more than 50 years.

Objective

The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the dose proportionality between two marketed strengths (12.5 mg and 25 mg) of doxylamine hydrogen succinate after a single oral dose administration under fasting conditions in healthy human subjects.

Study Design

This was a single-center, randomized, single dose, laboratory-blinded, two-period, two-sequence, crossover study.

Setting

The study was conducted in a phase I clinical unit.

Subjects and Methods

A single oral dose of doxylamine hydrogen succinate of 12.5 mg (equivalent to 8.7 mg of doxylamine base) or 25 mg (equivalent to 17.4 mg of doxylamine base) was administered to healthy volunteers under fasting conditions in each study period. The drug administrations were separated by a wash-out period of 7 calendar days. Blood samples were collected for up to 60 h post-dose, and plasma doxylamine levels were determined by an ultra high-performance liquid chromatography method with tandem mass spectrometry detection. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using non-compartmental analysis. Dose proportionality was assessed based on the parameter area under the concentration–time curve (AUC_{t normalized}). Safety was evaluated through assessment of adverse events, standard laboratory evaluations, vital signs and 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG).

Results

In total, 12 healthy volunteers (3 male; 9 female) were included in the study. Mean maximum observed plasma concentration (C_max) and area under the concentration–time curve from time zero to time t (AUC_t) of doxylamine hydrogen succinate 12.5 mg and 25 mg tablets increased linearly and dose-dependently [12.5 mg: mean C_max 61.94 ng/mL, coefficient of variation (CV) 23.2 %; mean AUC_t 817.33 ng·h/mL, CV 27.4 %; and 25 mg: mean C_max 124.91 ng/mL, CV 18.7 %; mean AUC_t 1630.85 ng·h/mL, CV 22.8 %]. Mean AUC_{t normalized} was 815.43 ng·h/mL, CV 22.8 % for 25 mg. The dose-normalized geometric mean ratio (%, 12.5 mg/25 mg) of AUC_t was 98.92 (90 % CI: 92.46, 105.83). The most common adverse event was somnolence.

Conclusions

Exposure to doxylamine was proportional over the therapeutic dose range of 12.5–25 mg in healthy volunteers. Based on the results, a predictable and linear increase in systemic exposure can be expected. Doxylamine hydrogen succinate was safe and well tolerated.

Food effects on the pharmacokinetics of doxylamine hydrogen succinate 25 mg film-coated tablets: a single-dose, randomized, two-period crossover study in healthy volunteers

BACKGROUND

Doxylamine succinate, an ethanolamine-based antihistamine, is used in the short-term management of insomnia because of its sedative effects. The data available on the pharmacokinetic profile of doxylamine in humans are limited, notwithstanding that this drug has been marketed in European countries for more than 50 years. In fact, no data on the effect of food on the pharmacokinetic parameters of doxylamine are available.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic parameters of doxylamine following a single oral dose of doxylamine hydrogen succinate 25 mg in healthy human subjects under fed and fasting conditions.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a single-center, randomized, single-dose, laboratory-blinded, two-period, two-sequence, crossover study.

SETTING

The study was conducted in a phase I clinical unit.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

A single oral dose of doxylamine hydrogen succinate 25 mg (equivalent to 17.4 mg of doxylamine base) was administered to healthy volunteers under either fed conditions (high-fat, high-calorie food intake) or fasting conditions in each study period. The drug administrations were separated by a wash-out period of seven calendar days. Plasma samples were collected for up to 60 hours postdose, and plasma doxylamine concentrations were determined by a high-performance liquid chromatography method with tandem mass spectrometry detection. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using noncompartmental analysis. Safety was evaluated through assessment of adverse events, standard laboratory evaluations, vital signs, and 12-lead electrocardiography.

RESULTS

In total, 24 healthy subjects (12 male and 12 female) were included in the study. Doxylamine succinate 25 mg tablets exhibited similar oral bioavailability of doxylamine in the fasting state (mean maximum plasma drug concentration [C(max)] 118.21 ng/mL, coefficient of variation [CV] 19.2%; mean area under the plasma concentration time curve from time zero to time t [AUC(t)] 1746.97 ng · h/mL, CV 31.6%) and in the fed state (mean C(max) 120.99 ng/mL, CV 15.0%; mean AUC(t) 1712.20 ng · h/mL, CV 26.7%). No statistically significant between-treatment differences were observed for any of the pharmacokinetic parameters under study. The fed : fasting ratios of the geometric least squares means with corresponding 90% confidence intervals for C(max) and AUC(t) were within the range of 80-125%.

CONCLUSION

High-fat, high-calorie food intake does not affect the kinetics of doxylamine in healthy subjects. The drug was safe and well tolerated by the subjects in this study.

Identifying developmental toxicity pathways for a subset of ToxCast chemicals using human embryonic stem cells and metabolomics

Metabolomics analysis was performed on the supernatant of human embryonic stem (hES) cell cultures exposed to a blinded subset of 11 chemicals selected from the chemical library of EPA's ToxCast™ chemical screening and prioritization research project. Metabolites from hES cultures were evaluated for known and novel signatures that may be indicative of developmental toxicity. Significant fold changes in endogenous metabolites were detected for 83 putatively annotated mass features in response to the subset of ToxCast chemicals. The annotations were mapped to specific human metabolic pathways. This revealed strong effects on pathways for nicotinate and nicotinamide metabolism, pantothenate and CoA biosynthesis, glutathione metabolism, and arginine and proline metabolism pathways. Predictivity for adverse outcomes in mammalian prenatal developmental toxicity studies used ToxRefDB and other sources of information, including Stemina Biomarker Discovery's predictive DevTox® model trained on 23 pharmaceutical agents of known developmental toxicity and differing potency. The model initially predicted developmental toxicity from the blinded ToxCast compounds in concordance with animal data with 73% accuracy. Retraining the model with data from the unblinded test compounds at one concentration level increased the predictive accuracy for the remaining concentrations to 83%. These preliminary results on a 11-chemical subset of the ToxCast chemical library indicate that metabolomics analysis of the hES secretome provides information valuable for predictive modeling and mechanistic understanding of mammalian developmental toxicity.

Comparative pharmacokinetics of single doses of doxylamine succinate following intranasal, oral and intravenous administration in rats

The intranasal route of administration provides a potential useful way of administering a range of systemic drugs. In order to assess the feasibility of this approach for the treatment of nausea and vomiting, doxylamine succinate was studied in rats for the pharmacokinetics (AUC, C(max), t(max)) following intranasal, oral and intravenous administrations. Subjects (six male Sprague-Dawley rats per time interval for each route of administration) received 2-mg doses of doxylamine succinate orally and I-mg doses intranasally and intravenously, respectively. The various formulations were formulated in isotonic saline (0.9% w/v) at 25 +/- 1 degrees C. Doxylamine succinate concentrations in plasma were determined with a high-performance liquid chromatographic assay and a liquid-liquid extraction procedure. Intranasal and oral bioavailabilities were determined from AUC values relative to those after intravenous dosing. Intranasal bioavailability was greater than that of oral doxylamine succinate (70.8 vs 24.7%). The intranasal and oral routes of administration differed significantly from the intravenous route of administration. Peak plasma concentration (C(max)) was 887.6 ng/ml (S.D. 74.4), 281.4 ng/ml (S.D. 24.6) and 1296.4 ng/ml (S.D. 388.9) for the intranasal, oral and intravenous routes, respectively. The time to achieve C(max) for the intranasal route (t(max)=0.5 h) was faster than for the oral route (t(max)=1.5 h), but no statistically significant differences between the C(max) values were found using 95% confidence intervals. The results of this study show that doxylamine succinate is rapidly and effectively absorbed from the nasal mucosa.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of diphenhydramine 25 mg in young and elderly volunteers

Thirty-seven young and elderly male and female volunteers 21 to 76 years of age received a single 25-mg oral dose of diphenhydramine or matching placebo in a double-blind, randomized, two-way crossover study. Plasma diphenhydramine concentrations, self-ratings of sedation, mood, and autonomic effects, performance on the digit-symbol substitution test (DSST), and heart rate were determined for 24 hours after administration. Information acquisition and recall were tested at 2.5 and 24 hours after administration. Age and gender did not significantly influence diphenhydramine peak plasma concentration, time of peak concentration, elimination half-life, area under the plasma concentration curve, or apparent oral clearance. Effects on psychomotor performance, sedation, mood, and memory did not differ between diphenhydramine and placebo in either group. Thus, the pharmacokinetics of single 25-mg oral doses of diphenhydramine are not influenced by age or gender. This dose of diphenhydramine produces essentially undetectable pharmacodynamic effects in both the young and elderly.

Assessment of doxylamine influence on mixed function oxidase activity upon multiple dose oral administration to normal volunteers

The primary purpose of this study was to assess the influence of doxylamine and phenobarbital on antipyrine/metabolites pharmacokinetics and 6 beta-hydroxycortisol urinary excretion. This study was conducted in 48 healthy male human volunteers (16 per treatment group) using a parallel study design. Treatment groups consisted of 12.5 mg of doxylamine succinate, placebo, or 30 mg of phenobarbital administered orally every 6 h for 17 days. Results indicate that no statistically significant differences were observed between the doxylamine and placebo groups that are indicative of enzyme induction. For the phenobarbital group, a significant increase for antipyrine total (36 versus 45 mL/h/kg) and nonrenal (35 versus 44 mL/h/kg) clearances and 6 beta-hydroxycortisol excretion (338 versus 529 micrograms) and a significant decrease in the terminal exponential half-life (11 versus 9 h) of antipyrine were observed.

Pharmacokinetics of terfenadine in healthy elderly subjects

The pharmacokinetics of the terfenadine active metabolite, metabolite I, was examined in ten healthy elderly adults and ten younger adults after single-dose oral administration of 120-mg terfenadine. All subjects successfully completed the study without reporting sedation or other adverse events. Absorption was rapid in both the young and elderly. The mean Cmax was the same for both groups, 501 ng/mL, and occurred at 2.3 hours in the young subjects and 2.5 hours in elderly subjects. However, the apparent clearance was reduced by about 25% in the elderly. After correcting clearance for bodyweight, this difference was not statistically significant.

Hepatic drug metabolism and aging

Although there is considerable variation in the effect of age on drug biotransformation, the metabolism of many drugs is impaired in the elderly. Age-related physiological changes, such as a reduction in liver mass, hepatic metabolising enzyme activity, liver blood flow and alterations in plasma drug binding may account for the decreased elimination of some metabolised drugs in the elderly. It is difficult, however, to separate an effect of aging from a background of marked variation in the rate of metabolism due to factors such as individual metabolic phenotype, environmental influences, concomitant disease states and drug intake. The prevailing data suggest that initial doses of metabolised drugs should be reduced in older patients and then modified according to the clinical response. In most studies the elderly appear as responsive as young individuals to the effects of compounds which induce or inhibit the activity of cytochrome P450 isozymes. Concurrent use of other agents, which induce or inhibit drug metabolism, mandates dose adjustment as in younger patients. Many questions remain unanswered. For instance, limitations of in vitro studies prevent any firm conclusion about changes in hepatic drug metabolising enzyme activity in the elderly. With aging, some pathways of drug metabolism may be selectively affected, but this has not been adequately scrutinised. The possibility that metabolism of stereoisomers may be altered in the elderly has not been adequately tested. The effect of aging on the distribution of polymorphic drug metabolism phenotypes is still not established, despite potential implications for disease susceptibility and survival advantage.