Pharmacokinetic drug interactions with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

Effect of Ketorolac on Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of 5-Fluorouracil: In Vivo and In Vitro Study

Background. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of ketorolac on the pharmacokinetics of 5-FU and its effect on the efficacy of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) on the HT-29 cell line. Methods. Cell culture: the HT-29 cell line was treated with different concentrations of 5-FU, ketorolac, and combination of 5-FU and ketorolac for 24 and 48 hours. The cell viability (%) was calculated by the MTT assay. Animal study: rats were randomly divided into control and pretreatment groups. The control group received physiological saline, whereas the pretreatment group received ketorolac by intraperitoneal (i.p.) injections on a daily basis for 14 days. On the 15th day, both groups received 5-FU (i.p.). Blood samples were collected at different times for HPLC analysis, and 5-FU pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated. Results. At cell culture study, in a certain concentration range, combination therapy showed synergistic effects (<0.05). However, at concentrations above this range, combination therapy showed antagonistic effects on 5-FU efficacy (<0.05). According to the pharmacokinetic analysis, pretreatment with ketorolac resulted in a significant increase in AUC, Cmax, and Tmax of 5-FU (<0.05) and a significant decrease in V/F and Cl/F of 5-FU (<0.05). Conclusions. Combination therapy with ketorolac and 5-FU, depending on time and concentration, has a synergistic effect on reducing the viability of cancer cells. Also, ketorolac is able to alter the pharmacokinetics of 5-FU. Since there is a close relationship between pharmacokinetic parameters of 5-FU and its effectiveness/toxicity, it seems that these changes are towards creating a synergistic effect on 5-FU cytotoxicity. These results suggest the need to optimize the dose of these drugs in order to increase clinical efficacy and reduce the toxicity associated with them.

Amikacin pharmacokinetics in elderly patients with severe infections

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to characterize the population pharmacokinetics of amikacin in elderly patients by means of nonlinear mixed effects modelling and to propose initial dosing schemes to optimize therapy based on PK/PD targets.

METHOD

A total of 137 elderly patients from 65 to 94 years receiving intravenous amikacin and routine therapeutic drug monitoring at Hospital Universitario Severo Ochoa were included. Concentration-time data and clinical information were retrospectively collected; initial doses of amikacin ranged from 5.7 to 22.5 mg/kg/day and each patient provided between 1 and 10 samples.

RESULTS

Amikacin pharmacokinetics were best described by a two-compartment open model; creatinine clearance (CrCL) was related to drug clearance (2.75 L/h/80 mL/min) and it was augmented 28% when non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were concomitantly administered. Body mass index (BMI) influenced the central volume of distribution (17.4 L/25 kg/m²). Relative absolute prediction error was reduced from 33.2% (base model) to 17.9% (final model) when predictive performance was evaluated with a different group of elderly patients. A nomogram for initial amikacin dosage was developed and evaluated based on stochastic simulations considering final model to achieve PK/PD targets (Cmax/MIC>10 and AUC/MIC>75) and to avoid toxic threshold (Cmin<2.5 mg/L).

CONCLUSION

Initial dosing approach for amikacin was designed for elderly patients based on nonlinear mixed effects modeling to maximize the probability to attain efficacy and safety targets considering individual BMI and CrCL.

Effects of dexamethasone coadministered with oseltamivir on the pharmacokinetics of oseltamivir in healthy volunteers

Purpose

Oseltamivir is widely used in the treatment and prophylaxis of influenza A and B viral infections. It is ingested as an oral prodrug that is rapidly metabolized by carboxylesterase 1 (CES1) to its active form, oseltamivir carboxylate. Dexamethasone is also used in the treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome, a severe complication of influenza; however, its influence on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of oseltamivir is controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of coadministering oseltamivir and dexamethasone on the PK of oseltamivir in healthy volunteers.

Methods

An open-label, two-period, one-sequence, multiple-dose study was conducted in 19 healthy male volunteers. Oseltamivir (75 mg) was orally administered on Day 1 and Day 8, and dexamethasone (1.5 mg) was administered once daily from Day 3 to Day 8. Serial blood and urine samples were collected for PK analysis of oseltamivir and oseltamivir carboxylate on Day 1 and Day 8. Oseltamivir and oseltamivir carboxylate concentrations in plasma and urine were determined using liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry.

Results

Area under the plasma concentration–time curve (AUC) of oseltamivir and oseltamivir carboxylate decreased after dexamethasone treatment for 6 days. The geometric mean ratio (90% confidence interval) of the metabolic ratio (oseltamivir carboxylate AUC_0–48h/oseltamivir AUC_0–48h) was 0.92 (0.87–0.97). The amount of unchanged oseltamivir excreted in urine increased by 14% after dexamethasone treatments.

Conclusion

Coadministration of dexamethasone with oseltamivir slightly decreased systemic exposure to oseltamivir and oseltamivir carboxylate in healthy volunteers. This result suggests that CES1 is inhibited by dexamethasone in humans. However, coadministration of oseltamivir and dexamethasone did not appear to have a clinically relevant effect on the PK of oseltamivir; based on these results, dexamethasone can be coadministered with oseltamivir.

The evolving role of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in colon cancer prevention: a cause for optimism

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a serious yet preventable disease. The low acceptance and cost of colonoscopy as a screening method or CRC make chemoprevention an important option. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), not currently recommended for CRC prevention, have the potential to evolve into the agents of choice for this indication. Here, we discuss the promise and challenge of NSAIDs for this chemopreventive application.Multiple epidemiologic studies, randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of sporadic colorectal polyp recurrence, RCTs in patients with hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes, and pooled analyses of cardiovascular-prevention RCTs linked to cancer outcomes have firmly established the ability of conventional NSAIDs to prevent CRC. NSAIDs, however, are seriously limited by their toxicity,which can become cumulative with their long-term administration for chemoprevention, whereas drug interactions in vulnerable elderly patients compound their safety. Newer, chemically modified NSAIDs offer the hope of enhanced efficacy and safety.Recent work also indicates that targeting earlier stages of colorectal carcinogenesis, such as the lower complexity aberrant crypt foci, is a promising approach that may only require relatively short use of chemopreventive agents. Drug combination approaches exemplified by sulindac plus difluoromethylornithine appear very efficacious. Identification of those at risk or most likely to benefit from a given intervention using predictive biomarkers may usher in personalized chemoprevention. Agents that offer simultaneous chemoprevention of diseases in addition to CRC, e.g., cardiovascular and/or neurodegenerative diseases,may have a much greater potential for a broad clinical application.

New insights into the use of currently available non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), which act via inhibition of the cyclooxygenase (COX) isozymes, were discovered more than 100 years ago. They remain a key component of the pharmacological management of acute and chronic pain. The COX-1 and COX-2 isozymes have different biological functions; analgesic activity is primarily (although not exclusively) associated with inhibition of COX-2, while different side effects result from the inhibition of COX-1 and COX-2. All available NSAIDs, including acetaminophen and aspirin, are associated with potential side effects, particularly gastrointestinal and cardiovascular effects, related to their relative selectivity for COX-1 and COX-2. Since all NSAIDs exert their therapeutic activity through inhibition of the COX isozymes, strategies are needed to reduce the risks associated with NSAIDs while achieving sufficient pain relief. A better understanding of the inhibitory activity and COX-1/COX-2 selectivity of an NSAID at therapeutic doses, based on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties (eg, inhibitory dose, absorption, plasma versus tissue distribution, and elimination), and the impact on drug tolerability and safety can guide the selection of appropriate NSAIDs for pain management. For example, many NSAIDs with moderate to high selectivity for COX-2 versus COX-1 can be administered at doses that maximize efficacy (~80% inhibition of COX-2) while minimizing COX-1 inhibition and associated side effects, such as gastrointestinal toxicity. Acidic NSAIDs with favorable tissue distribution and short plasma half-lives can additionally be dosed to provide near-constant analgesia while minimizing plasma concentrations to permit recovery of COX-mediated prostaglandin production in the vascular wall and other organs. Each patient’s clinical background, including gastrointestinal and cardiovascular risk factors, should be taken into account when selecting appropriate NSAIDs. New methods are emerging to assist clinicians in the selection of appropriate NSAIDs and their doses/schedules, such as biomarkers that may predict the response to NSAID treatment in individual patients.

Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs: a review

The increasing use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in small animals has resulted in the development of new and innovative additions to this class of drugs. Examples of NSAIDs now available for use in small animals include aspirin, etodolac, carprofen, ketoprofen, meloxicam, deracoxib, and tepoxalin. The purposes of this article are to review the pathophysiology of prostaglandin synthesis and inhibition, the mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetics, pharmacological effects, and potential adverse reactions of aspirin and the newly released NSAIDs.

Pharmacokinetics and interactions of headache medications, part I: introduction, pharmacokinetics, metabolism and acute treatments

Recent progress in the treatment of primary headaches has made available specific, effective and safe medications for these disorders, which are widely spread among the general population. One of the negative consequences of this undoubtedly positive progress is the risk of drug-drug interactions. This review is the first in a two-part series on pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions of headache medications. Part I addresses acute treatments. Part II focuses on prophylactic treatments. The overall aim of this series is to increase the awareness of physicians, either primary care providers or specialists, regarding this topic. Pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions of major severity involving acute medications are a minority among those reported in literature. The main drug combinations to avoid are: i) NSAIDs plus drugs with a narrow therapeutic range (i.e., digoxin, methotrexate, etc.); ii) sumatriptan, rizatriptan or zolmitriptan plus monoamine oxidase inhibitors; iii) substrates and inhibitors of CYP2D6 (i.e., chlorpromazine, metoclopramide, etc.) and -3A4 (i.e., ergot derivatives, eletriptan, etc.), as well as other substrates or inhibitors of the same CYP isoenzymes. The risk of having clinically significant pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions seems to be limited in patients with low frequency headaches, but could be higher in chronic headache sufferers with medication overuse.

Adjuvant arthritis-induced changes on ampicillin binding in serum and tissues under the influence of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in rats

Adjuvant arthritis, as a model for investigating rheumatoid arthritis (RA), is characterized by reduced plasma albumin levels and interferes with drug binding in the plasma and tissues (liver and bone). Ampicillin interacts with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) due to the acidic pk(a). The aim of this study was to investigate in vitro the concentrations of ampicillin in the serum, femur, mandible and liver proteins following the co-administration of ketoprofen, flurbiprofen, ibuprofen, oxyphenbutazone and ASA in adjuvant arthritis versus healthy control rats. Ampicillin binding was found to be reduced in the serum of arthritic rats, and ampicillin binding to serum proteins was also reduced under the influence of NSAIDs in the control animals. Differences in ampicillin binding were observed in the various tissues due to the effect of adjuvant arthritis as well as that due to the co-administration of NSAIDs. In conclusion, this in vitro study may provide a plausible explanation for the ampicillin-NSAIDs interaction and such a finding may be of therapeutic significance in the treatment of painful arthritic disease such as RA.

Pharmacokinetics of flunixin in the cat: enterohepatic circulation and active transport mechanism in the liver

The plasma and urine pharmacokinetics of flunixin-meglumine (FNX) in cats were examined using a total of 12 adult animals. After an intravenous injection of FNX (2 mg/kg), the plasma concentration time curves showed a profile of a two-compartment open model with an elimination half-life of 6.6 h. In spite of high plasma protein binding (>99%), the V(d)beta was unusually large, 0.7 L/kg. Although the recovery of FNX from urine was only 0.4% of the dose, the estimated inherent renal clearance closely corresponded to the renal plasma flow rate, indicating that a renal active tubular secretion was involved in the pharmacokinetics of FNX. Cholestyramine (ChSA), an anion exchanger, was orally administered immediately before the FNX injection in order to determine the involvement of enterohepatic circulation in FNX pharmacokinetics. The elimination phase of the profile of FNX was prevented by the concomitant administration of ChSA, so it was concluded that the drug undergoes enterohepatic circulation in cats. Pravastatin (PV) is a specific substrate of the type-2 organic anion transporting polypeptide transporter (OATP-2) in human liver cells. The effect of a concomitant intravenous injection of PV with FNX was examined in order to determine the involvement of OATP-2 like transporter in the pharmacokinetics. The V1 and total body clearance were decreased after the injection of PV. In conclusion, at least two active transport mechanisms are involved in the pharmacokinetics of FNX in cats. One pathway is renal tubular secretion and the other is sinusoidal active uptake by liver cells. The latter may be responsible for the enterohepatic circulation of FNX in cats.

Effects of renal insufficiency and hemodialysis on the pharmacokinetics of rofecoxib

Rofecoxib (VIOXX, Merck & Co., West Point, PA) is a COX-2-selective inhibitor that combines anti-inflammatory and analgesic efficacy with improved gastrointestinal (GI) safety. The present open-label study investigated the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of a single, oral dose of rofecoxib (50 mg) in patients with end-stage renal failure (creatinine clearance <5 mL/min/1.73 m(2)) requiring hemodialysis. Rofecoxib AUC(0-48 h), AUC(0- infinity), C(max), T(max), and t(1/2) obtained from renal failure patients on hemodialysis were not significantly different from those obtained from healthy subjects. With hemodialysis initiated 48 hours postdose, rofecoxib AUC(0-48 h) adjusted mean ratio (renal failure/healthy subjects) was 0.81, with a corresponding 90% confidence interval (CI; 0.66, 1.00). Hemodialysis per se had no clinically meaningful effect on rofecoxib pharmacokinetics: plasma rofecoxib concentration-time curves were virtually superimposable when hemodialysis was initiated at 4 or 48 hours following rofecoxib dosing, although mean rofecoxib C(max) was 18% lower during the former (325 versus 395 ng/mL; P = 0.014). Overall, rofecoxib was well tolerated in end-stage renal disease patients. In this study, end-stage renal disease and hemodialysis had little effect on rofecoxib pharmacokinetics. Although there are no clinical data to support the use of rofecoxib in patients with severe renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance, 5-30 mL/min/1.73 m(2)), these data suggest that dosage adjustment of rofecoxib is not needed for patients with impaired renal function.

A review of the common properties of drugs with idiosyncratic hepatotoxicity and the "multiple determinant hypothesis" for the manifestation of idiosyncratic drug toxicity

Idiosyncratic drug toxicity is generally believed to be a phenomenon that cannot be readily evaluated experimentally. Reasons for this difficulty include the following: 1. It is a rare event (<1/5,000) and therefore impossible to be studied in clinical trials; 2. It is a human-specific event not detectable in experimental animals. To aid the understanding of idiosyncratic toxicity and to develop an experimental strategy for this phenomenon, a hypothesis is proposed. The hypothesis states that the low frequency of idiosyncratic drug toxicity is due to the requirements for the occurrence of multiple critical and discrete events, with the probability for the occurrence of idiosyncratic drug toxicity as a product of the probabilities of each event. The key determinants of these critical events are proposed to be: 1. Chemical properties; 2. exposure; 3. environmental factors; and 4. genetic factors. Based on this hypothesis, idiosyncratic drug toxicity can be evaluated experimentally via studying these key determinants. The chemical properties critical to idiosyncratic drug toxicity are identified via a review of the common properties of drugs that cause idiosyncratic liver toxicity. These properties include: 1. Formation of reactive metabolites. 2. Metabolism by P450 isoforms. 3. Preponderance of P450 inducers, and 4. Occurrence of clinically significant pharmacokinetic interactions with co-administered drugs. Based on this review, it is proposed that these common properties may be useful experimental endpoints for the prediction and therefore avoidance of the selection of drug candidates with idiosyncratic drug toxicity for further development.

Open-label study of the effect of combination quetiapine/lithium therapy on lithium pharmacokinetics and tolerability

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the effect of oral quetiapine on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of lithium.

METHODS

This was an open-label trial in patients with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, or bipolar disorder who had demonstrated tolerability to combination lithium/ antipsychotic therapy. Patients received lithium for at least 1 week before screening and throughout the 18-day trial. Quetiapine was coadministered in fixed, stepwise, increasing doses of 25 to 250 mg TID on days 4 through 11, and maintained at 250 mg TID on days 12 through 14. Blood samples were drawn to monitor plasma concentrations of lithium and quetiapine. Psychiatric assessments included the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, the Clinical Global Impression severity of illness item, and the modified Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms. Neurologic function was assessed using the Simpson-Angus Scale and the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale. Other assessments included clinical laboratory testing, electrocardiography, physical examinations, and monitoring for spontaneously reported adverse events.

RESULTS

Nine men and 1 woman (mean [SE] age, 32.8 [1.9] years; mean [SE] body weight, 87.6 [3.3] kg) entered and completed the 18-day trial. Eight patients had bipolar disorder, 1 had paranoid schizophrenia, and 1 had schizoaffective disorder. Morning trough concentrations of lithium in serum (days 2, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, and 17), as well as quetiapine and 2 of its metabolites in plasma (days 12, 13, and 14), did not appear to vary noticeably. Small increases were observed in the mean values of the area under the 12-hour serum lithium concentration-time curve and the maximum and minimum observed serum lithium concentrations when quetiapine was added to the lithium regimen. However, the increases were not considered clinically relevant by the investigators and were not statistically significant. A total of 91 adverse events were reported, 67 (73.6%) of which were not attributed to trial treatment. The most commonly reported adverse events during coadministration of lithium and quetiapine were somnolence (90.0% [9/10]), asthenia (70.0% [7/10]), dry mouth (30.0% [3/10]), nausea (30.0% [3/10]), vomiting (30.0% [3/10]), dizziness (30.0% [3/10]), tremor (30.0% [3/10]), and insomnia (20.0% [2/10]). There were no serious adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Measures of lithium and quetiapine concentrations did not vary significantly during combination therapy. Coadministered lithium and quetiapine were well tolerated in the patients studied.

Chronic pain in the older patient: management strategies. 2

This is the second of a two-part series, which highlights issues and strategies related to pain assessment in older adults and current problems of pain management in older adults and analgesic regimens pertinent to this population. The complexities of assessing pain in older adults and assessment techniques for accomplishing a careful evaluation of pain were presented in the first part of this series, which was published in the January issue of the Journal of Gerontological Nursing (Vol. 28, No. 1). This article addresses issues and strategies related to management of pain, particularly analgesic use, in this challenging population.

Effect of carprofen on hemostatic variables in dogs

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of carprofen on hemostatic variables in clinically normal dogs.

ANIMALS

12 clinically normal Labrador Retrievers.

PROCEDURE

10 dogs (6 females, 4 males) received carprofen (2.2 mg/kg of body weight, PO, q 12 h) for 5 days. Two dogs (untreated control group; 1 female, 1 male) did not receive carprofen. Hemostatic variables (platelet count, activated partial thromboplastin time, prothrombin time, fibrinogen, platelet aggregation, and bleeding time) were assessed for all dogs prior to treatment, on day 5 of treatment, and 2 and 7 days after discontinuation of the drug (days 7 and 12). Serum biochemical variables and Hct were assessed prior to treatment and on days 5 and 12.

RESULTS

In dogs receiving carprofen, platelet aggregation was significantly decreased, and onset of aggregation was significantly delayed on days 5, 7, and 12, compared with pretreatment values. Activated partial thromboplastin time was significantly increased on days 5, 7, and 12 over pretreatment values in treated dogs, but values remained within reference ranges. Significant differences were not detected in buccal mucosal bleeding time, other serum biochemical and hemostatic variables, or Hct, compared with pretreatment values and the internal control group.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Administration of carprofen for 5 days causes minor but not clinically important alterations in hemostatic and serum biochemical variables in clinically normal Labrador Retrievers. Carprofen is commonly used to treat osteoarthritis and chronic pain in dogs, but prior to this study, its effect on platelet aggregation and hemostatic variables was unknown.

Celecoxib: a new option in the treatment of arthropathies and familial adenomatous polyposis

The discovery of the two isoenzymes of cyclooxygenase (COX) has recently lead to the development and clinical introduction of specific inhibitors of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), such as celecoxib, onto the market. Celecoxib is an effective anti-inflammatory, analgesic and antipyretic agent therapeutically utilised in the management of osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. In addition, celecoxib has some novel therapeutic and pharmacological activities. Celecoxib inhibits anti-apoptotic kinase activation and is the first specific COX-2 inhibitor to be marketed for familial adenomatous polyposis, an inheritable predisposition for colorectal cancer. Celecoxib is not without gastrointestinal (GI) side effects but demonstrates markedly reduced GI ulceration in clinical trials when compared to traditional non-specific non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). The specific COX-2 inhibitors each have distinctive pharmacokinetic properties. Celecoxib can be given either once or twice daily. Racial differences in drug disposition, and pharmacokinetic changes in elderly patients, patients with chronic renal insufficiency and patients with mild to moderate hepatic impairment, are evident with celecoxib. Despite the specific action of these drugs, there remains the potential for significant drug interactions. Celecoxib has demonstrated interactions with fluconazole, lithium and warfarin. Increased clinical vigilance should be maintained when co-prescribing medications with celecoxib until further clinical experience is gained. Celecoxib represents a major therapeutic advance in terms of GI safety. However, long-term safety in other organ systems, safety with concomitant drug administration, and pharmacoeconomic benefits still remain to be proven.

Geropharmacology for the rheumatologist

Drug administration to older patients with rheumatic disease is a challenge because they are more likely to have adverse drug reactions compared with younger patients. Elderly patients are at risk for adverse drug effects because they often have multiple acute and chronic illnesses and are on several prescription and over-the-counter medications. This article will enhance the practitioner's understanding of how disease and age modulate the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of medications commonly prescribed for rheumatic disorders. Minimizing the number of drugs prescribed, starting medications at low doses and increasing slowly, and monitoring for toxicity are especially important in the elderly. With judicious use of medications, the quality of life of older patients with rheumatic disease can be enhanced.

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory analgesics. Indications and contraindications for pain management in dogs and cats

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory analgesics (NSAIAs) are effective in controlling most acute and chronic pain conditions. In veterinary practice these analgesics may be superior to opioids in that the duration of action is much longer, with equal efficacy in many instances, making effective pain management possible for most veterinary patients. NSAIAs act synergistically in combination with other modalities of pain management, including all opioids, local anesthetics, and various sedatives. Because of their mechanism of action, however, there is a potential for perturbation of several homeostatic functions mediated by prostaglandins. Not all NSAIAs are equal in efficacy and safety, so careful patient and NSAIA selection with appropriate monitoring is advised. This article discusses the indications and contraindications for NSAIA use with a short description of the currently available NSAIAs approved for use in veterinary patients.

Choosing the right nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug for the right patient: a pharmacokinetic approach

Effective use of the growing number of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), a group that has recently been augmented by the introduction of the selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors, requires adequate knowledge of their pharmacokinetics. After oral administration, the absorption of NSAIDs is generally rapid and complete. NSAIDs are highly bound to plasma proteins, specifically to albumin (>90%). The volume of distribution of NSAIDs is low, ranging from 0.1 to 0.3 L/kg, suggesting minimal tissue binding. NSAID binding in plasma can be saturated when the concentration of the NSAID exceeds that of albumin. Most NSAIDs are metabolised by the liver, with subsequent excretion into urine or bile. Enterohepatic recirculation occurs when a significant amount of an NSAID or its conjugated metabolites are excreted into the bile and then reabsorbed in the distal intestine. NSAID elimination is not dependent on hepatic blood flow. Hepatic NSAID elimination is dependent on the free fraction of NSAID within the plasma and the intrinsic enzyme activities of the liver. Renal elimination is not an important elimination pathway for NSAIDs, except for azapropazone. The plasma half-life of NSAIDs ranges from 0.25 to >70 hours, indicating wide differences in clearance rates. Hepatic or renal disease can alter NSAID protein binding and metabolism. Some NSAIDs with elimination predominantly via acylglucuronidation can have significantly altered disposition. Pharmacokinetics are also influenced by chronobiology, and many NSAIDs exhibit stereoselectivity. There appear to be relationships between NSAID concentration and effects. At therapeutically equivalent doses, NSAIDs appear to be equally efficacious. The major differences between NSAIDs are their therapeutic half-lives and safety profiles. NSAIDs undergo drug interactions through protein binding displacement and competition for active renal tubular secretion with other organic acids. When choosing the right NSAID for the right patient, individual patient-specific and NSAID-specific pharmacokinetic principles should be considered.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of nimesulide

Nimesulide is a selective COX-2 inhibitor used in a variety of inflammatory, pain and fever states. After healthy volunteers received oral nimesulide 100 mg in tablet, granule or suspension form the drug was rapidly and extensively absorbed. Mean peak concentrations (Cmax) of 2.86 to 6.50 mg/L were achieved within 1.22 to 2.75 hours of administration. The presence of food did not reduce either the rate or extent of nimesulide absorption. When nimesulide was administered in the suppository form, the Cmax was lower and occurred later than after oral administration; the bioavailability of nimesulide via suppository ranged from 54 to 64%, relative to that of orally administered formulations. Nimesulide is rapidly distributed and has an apparent volume of distribution ranging between 0.18 and 0.39 L/kg. It is extensively bound to albumin; the unbound fraction in plasma was 1%. The unbound fraction increased to 2 and 4% in patients with renal or hepatic insufficiency. With oral administration, the concentrations of nimesulide declined monoexponentially following Cmax. The estimated mean terminal elimination half-life varied from 1.80 to 4.73 hours. Excretion of the unchanged drug in urine and faeces is negligible. Nimesulide is largely eliminated via metabolic transformation and the principal metabolite is the 4'-hydroxy derivative (M1). Minor metabolites have been detected in urine and faeces, mainly in a conjugated form. Pharmacological tests in vivo have shown that the metabolites are endowed with anti-inflammatory and analgesic properties, although their activity is lower than that of nimesulide. Excretion in the urine and faeces accounted for 50.5 to 62.5% and 17.9 to 36.2% of an orally administered dose, respectively. The total plasma clearance of nimesulide, was 31.02 to 106.16 ml/h/kg, reflecting almost exclusive metabolic clearance. The drug has a low extraction ratio, close to 0.1. With twice daily oral or rectal administration of nimesulide, steady-state was achieved within 24 to 48 hours (2 to 4 administrations); only modest accumulation of nimesulide and M1 occurred. Gender has only a limited influence on the pharmacokinetic profiles of nimesulide and M1. The pharmacokinetic profiles of nimesulide and M1 in children and the elderly did not differ from that of healthy young individuals. Hepatic insufficiency affected the pharmacokinetics of nimesulide and M1 to a significant extent: the rate of elimination of nimesulide and M1 was remarkably reduced in comparison to the rate of elimination in healthy individuals. Therefore, a dose reduction (4 to 5 times) is required in patients with hepatic impairment. The pharmacokinetic profile of nimesulide and M1 was not altered in patients with moderate renal failure and no dose adjustment in patients with creatinine clearances higher than 1.8 L/h is envisaged. Pharmacokinetic interactions between nimesulide and other drugs given in combination [i.e. glibenclamide, cimetidine, antacids, furosemide (frusemide), theophylline, warfarin and digoxin] were absent, or of no apparent clinical relevance.

Pharmacokinetic drug interactions with anti-ulcer drugs

The safety profile of any pharmacological agent is defined on the basis of its toxicity, tolerability and potential for pharmacokinetic and/or pharmacodynamic interactions with other compounds, which may belong to the same or to a different pharmacological class. Drug-drug interactions are important in clinical practice because short and long term therapeutic regimens frequently require coadministration of different drugs. The pharmacological treatment of gastric and duodenal ulcers (and of related syndromes) includes older and newer compounds, which have different mechanisms of action and exert different therapeutic effects. These compounds are widely prescribed in combination with other drugs being given for the treatment of concomitant diseases. This article reviews pharmacokinetic interactions with anti-ulcer drugs, paying particular attention to those which have clinically relevant adverse effects. Drugs mentioned in the literature as causing any pharmacokinetic interaction with anti-ulcer compounds are considered in this article.

Determination of folate transport pathways in cultured rat proximal tubule cells

Deficiency of the vitamin folic acid has recently been linked with increased incidence of neural tube defects and of cardiovascular disease, through elevated plasma homocysteine levels. The kidney has an important role in conserving folate to counteract development of deficiency. Urinary folate excretion is regulated by the degree of reabsorption of folate by the proximal tubule cell. To evaluate an in vitro model for studies of the regulation of urinary folate excretion, the present studies examined the transport of 5-methyltetrahydrofolate (5-CH3-H4PteGlu), the primary form of folate in the glomerular filtrate, by normal rat proximal tubule (RPT) cells in confluent monolayer cultures. Specific binding of 5-CH3-H4PteGlu to the apical membrane was saturable (K(D) = 27 nM), but intracellular transport was not saturated up to 100 nM concentrations. 5-CH3-H4PteGlu transport was decreased 50% by concentrations of folic acid that completely blocked 5-CH3-H4PteGlu binding by the apical folate receptor. Probenecid (10 mM), an anion exchange (reduced folate carrier) inhibitor, reduced 5CH3-H4PteGlu transport by 50% without significantly affecting binding. Aspirin (3 mM) did not alter 5-CH3-H4PteGlu transport, but significantly enhanced the inhibition due to probenecid. Similarly, indomethacin (5 microM) potentiated the inhibition of 5-CH3-H4PteGlu transport by probenecid. These data suggest that RPT cells take up 5-CH3-H4PteGlu by both the folate receptor and the reduced folate carrier, implying a role for both pathways in regulating urinary folate excretion.

Lack of interaction between meloxicam and warfarin in healthy volunteers

OBJECTIVE

The effect of multiple oral doses of meloxicam 15 mg on the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of warfarin was investigated in healthy male volunteers. Warfarin was administered in an individualized dose to achieve a stable reduction in prothrombin times calculated as International Normalized Ratio (INR) values. Then INR- and a drug concentration-time profile was determined. For the interaction phase, meloxicam was added for 7 days and then INR measurements and the warfarin drug profiles were repeated for comparison. Overall, warfarin treatment lasted for 30 days.

RESULTS

Warfarin and meloxicam were well tolerated by healthy volunteers in this study. Thirteen healthy volunteers with stable INR values entered the interaction phase. Prothrombin times, expressed as mean INR values, were not significantly altered by concomitant meloxicam treatment, being 1.20 for warfarin alone and 1.27 for warfarin with meloxicam cotreatment. R- and S-warfarin pharmacokinetics were similar for both treatments. Geometric mean (% gCV) AUCss values for the more potent S-enantiomer were 5.07 mg.h.l-1 (27.5%) for warfarin alone and 5.64 mg.h.l-1 (28.1%) during the interaction phase. Respective AUCss values for R-warfarin were 7.31 mg.h.l-1 (43.8%) and 7.58 mg.h.l-1 (39.1%).

CONCLUSION

The concomitant administration of the new non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) meloxicam affected neither the pharmacodynamics nor the pharmacokinetics of a titrated warfarin dose. A combination of both drugs should nevertheless be avoided and, if necessary, INR monitoring is considered mandatory.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of flurbiprofen and its enantiomers

Flurbiprofen is a chiral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) of the 2-arylpropionic acid class. Although it possesses a chiral centre, with the S-(+)-enantiomer possessing most of the beneficial anti-inflammatory activity, both enantiomers may possess analgesic activity and all flurbiprofen preparations to date are marketed as the racemate. Flurbiprofen exhibits stereoselectivity in its pharmacokinetics. Stereoselectivity is exhibited at the level of protein binding and metabolite formation. Hence, the data generated using nonstereoselective assays may not be used to explain the pharmacokinetics of individual enantiomers. The absorption of flurbiprofen is rapid and almost complete when given orally. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve of flurbiprofen is proportional to the dose administered to patients. Sustained release dosage forms are available, which may be beneficial due to the short terminal phase elimination half-life of conventional immediate release flurbiprofen (3 to 6 hours). They may also decrease local gastrointestinal adverse effects. Although with these preparations the peak plasma drug concentration is reduced and time taken to achieve peak concentrations is prolonged, the bioavailability is the same as that with regular release counterparts. Flurbiprofen binds extensively to plasma albumin, apparently in a stereoselective manner. Substantial concentrations of the drug are attained in synovial fluid, which is the proposed site of action of NSAIDs. There is negligible R to S inversion after oral administration. Flurbiprofen is eliminated following extensive biotransformation to glucuro-conjugated metabolites. Conjugates are excreted in urine, and approximately 20% of flurbiprofen is eliminated unchanged. The excretion of conjugates may be tied to renal function as accumulation of conjugates occurs in end-stage renal disease, but not in young individuals or elderly patients. Although flurbiprofen is excreted into breast milk, the amount of drug transferred comprises only a small fraction of the maternal exposure. Significant drug interactions have been demonstrated for aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid), coumarins and propranolol. The relationship between concentration and anti-inflammatory and analgesic effect has yet to be elucidated for this drug.

Effect of tenidap sodium on the pharmacodynamics and plasma protein binding of warfarin in healthy volunteers

1. An open-label, randomised study was performed to assess the effect of tenidap sodium on the pharmacodynamics and plasma protein binding of warfarin. 2. Fourteen healthy male volunteers received either a single oral dose of 120 mg tenidap sodium or matching placebo capsules from days 11 to 36. A single oral dose of 0.75 mg kg-1 warfarin was administered on days 1 and 32. 3. The mean prothrombin AUC(1,120h) value between baseline and day 32 increased from 1692.4 +/- 234.5 s h to 1769.3 +/- 218.0 s h in the group given tenidap, and decreased from 1747.6 +/- 289.4 s h to 1708.1 +/- 236.8 s h in the placebo group. 4. Tenidap caused a slight delay in the normalisation of prothrombin times following the second dose of warfarin on day 32 compared with the first dose on day 1. This was significant at 36, 48, 72 and 96 h but not at 120 h after administration of warfarin. 5. The mean percentage of unbound warfarin in the tenidap group (0.08% +/- 0.09) was significantly different (P = 0.047) from that in the placebo group (-0.03% +/- 0.10) but this was not considered to be clinically meaningful. 6. These data indicate that prothrombin times should be monitored during concomitant administration of tenidap and warfarin.

Pharmacokinetics of gentamicin in rabbits pretreated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: an interaction study

Interaction between nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and other drugs occurs relatively frequently because of the wide use of NSAIDs. Such interactions with drugs of narrow therapeutic index used in serious disease states may lead to toxicity. Gentamicin toxicity is based on its concentration in serum, and any alteration in pharmacokinetic parameters may lead to gentamicin accumulation in the body and subsequently to severe nephrotoxicity and ototoxicity. To test this hypothesis, the effect of pretreatment with NSAIDs on gentamicin pharmacokinetics was examined in rabbit. Gentamicin sulfate (5 mg/kg) was administered to rabbits pretreated with aspirin (300 mg/kg), ketorolac tromethamine (3 mg/kg), ibuprofen (20 mg/kg), and piroxicam (2 mg/kg) twice a day for 1 week. The pretreatment with NSAIDs had significant effects on the body clearance and maximum concentration. Aspirin, piroxicam and ketorolac tromethamine pretreatment had significant effects on the area under the curve of gentamicin versus time. Aspirin and ketorolac tromethamine pretreatment had significant effects on the half-life of gentamicin. Aspirin had a significant effect on the volume of distribution of gentamicin. These results suggest that pretreatment with NSAIDs alters the pharmacokinetics of gentamicin and leads to accumulation inside the body, which could result in toxicity.

Neither cimetidine nor probenecid affect the pharmacokinetics of tenoxicam in normal volunteers

The effect of pretreatment with cimetidine (1 g day-1, 7 days) and of probenecid (1 g twice daily, 4 days) on the pharmacokinetics of tenoxicam (single oral dose, 20 mg) was studied in six healthy volunteers. Cmax was increased significantly when tenoxicam was given with probenecid (2.8 micrograms ml-1 alone, 3.5 micrograms ml-1 after probenecid; P < 0.005). No other pharmacokinetic parameters were altered significantly by either drug. It is concluded that neither cimetidine nor probenecid affects the pharmacokinetics of tenoxicam in a clinically important way.

Effects of diclofenac on isradipine pharmacokinetics and platelet aggregation in volunteers

In this open, two-period crossover study in 18 healthy male volunteers, a single oral dose of 50 mg diclofenac was administered alone and on day 7 of multiple oral dosing of 5 mg b.i.d. isradipine to assess a possible pharmacokinetic interaction. The effect of these drugs on ex vivo platelet function was also determined. Serial blood samples were obtained over 12-hour periods on three occasions: after the single diclofenac dose; after the morning dose of isradipine on day 6 and after co-administration of both drugs on day 7 of steady-state isradipine administration. Additional samples were taken at 2 h post dose for determination of ex vivo platelet aggregation. Isradipine plasma concentrations were determined by a gas chromatographic method and diclofenac plasma concentrations by an HPLC method. The pharmacokinetic characteristics of diclofenac were unaltered during co-administration. The maximum plasma concentration of isradipine was increased 19.6% during co-administration from 5.06 to 6.05 ng.ml-1. This is not expected to be of clinical importance. Isradipine's apparent total body clearance and steady-state AUC remained unchanged. Ex vivo induced platelet aggregation was not affected by any of the treatments.

A clinical assessment of the potential for pharmacological interaction between nimesulide and digoxin in patients with heart failure

The potential interaction between nimesulide, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, and digoxin was studied in 9 patients [6 males, 3 females; mean age 67 (range 57 to 70) years] with mild heart failure. All patients were receiving maintenance therapy with digoxin (0.25 mg/day, orally) and were treated with oral nimesulide 100mg twice daily for 7 days. Blood samples were collected at 8am and 6pm for 4 days before and throughout the nimesulide treatment period for determination of serum digoxin concentrations. Physical health, electrocardiographic recordings and blood and urine samples were also monitored. Mean serum digoxin concentrations remained within the normal therapeutic range throughout the study despite large interindividual variation. Furthermore, there were no significant differences between the morning and afternoon serum digoxin concentrations and there was no major change in the clinical condition of any patient. These results indicate that short term administration (7 days) of conventional therapeutic doses of nimesulide (100mg twice daily) does not modify the serum digoxin profile in patients with low class heart failure treated with a maintenance dose (0.25 mg/day) of this cardiac glycoside.

Prinomide tromethamine pharmacokinetics: mutually dependent saturable and competitive protein binding between prinomide and its own metabolite

Prinomide tromethamine, a nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug, was orally administered at doses of 250, 500, and 1000 mg every 12 hr for 28 days to healthy male volunteers. The pharmacokinetic behavior of prinomide and its primary plasma metabolite displayed nonlinear characteristics, while those of free prinomide and its metabolite were dose proportional. The nonlinear pharmacokinetic behavior of total prinomide and p-hydroxy metabolite was found to be caused by both saturable and mutually dependent competitive Langmuir-type plasma protein binding between prinomide and its p-hydroxy metabolite. The extent of the protein interaction displayed at steady state was due to the extensive accumulation of the p-hydroxy metabolite. While ligand-protein interactions are known for xenobiotic competitors, the characteristic behavior of prinomide is the first known example to be reported for a competitive protein interaction between a xenobiotic and its own in vivo generated metabolite. The findings of this study may have implications regarding the disposition of other extensively bound nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs with long-lived metabolites.

Pharmacokinetics of etodolac enantiomers in the rat after administration of phenobarbital or cimetidine

The influences of phenobarbital and cimetidine on the pharmacokinetics of etodolac enantiomers were studied in male Sprague-Dawley rats. Phenobarbital caused significant reductions in the AUC of both the active S-enantiomer (24%) and the inactive R-enantiomer of etodolac (26%), and an increase in the urinary excretion of glucuronidated S-etodolac. In bile duct-cannulated rats the initial biliary recoveries of the acyl-glucuronidated etodolac enantiomers were not affected by phenobarbital. In vitro, phenobarbital caused no changes in the hepatic microsomal net glucuronidation of etodolac enantiomers after phenobarbital, although it did result in significant increases in the apparent oxidative metabolism of both enantiomers. Therefore, phenobarbital seems to cause an enhanced CL of etodolac by induction of hepatic non-conjugative metabolism. Cimetidine had no discernible effect on the pharmacokinetics of etodolac enantiomers.

Clearance of indomethacin occurs predominantly by renal glucuronidation

In this report we describe the conditions of collection, storage and handling of urine samples, collected after oral dosing with indomethacin in man, in order to maintain the integrity of the labile glucuronide formed. We found that the body clearance occurs predominantly by renal metabolism, due to glucuronidation in the human kidney. These glucuronides may be converted to isomeric glucuronides and/or the parent compound indomethacin during the residence time in the bladder.

The drug interaction potential of ranitidine: an update

Ranitidine is a H2-receptor antagonist widely used in the treatment of a variety of gastrointestinal disorders. Since cimetidine--the predecessor drug of ranitidine--interacts with a variety of other agents and moreover ranitidine is often administered in combination with other drugs the interaction potential of ranitidine has been subject to extensive investigations. This review updates the information available from 1988 to present. Pharmacokinetic interactions of ranitidine with other drugs may occur at the site of absorption, metabolism and renal excretion. Most of the interactions reported at each of the three levels are minor and of low clinical significance. In view of some uncontrolled anecdotal reports, one cannot completely rule out the possibility that ranitidine might have some limited interaction potential in special patient populations under certain clinical conditions. However, it must be emphasized that numerous controlled studies have proven that ranitidine can be safely coadministered with other drugs.