An updated comparison of drug dosing methods. Part IV: Vancomycin

Vancomycin Dosing in Haemodialysis Patients and Bayesian Estimate of Individual Pharmacokinetic Parameters

A dose reduction of vancomycin to 1000 mg once a week usually is recommended for haemodialysis patients. Our modified dosing schedule consists of a loading dose of 1000 mg and a maintenance dose of 500 mg administered 3 times a week after haemodialysis. Different vancomycin regimens were retrospectively evaluated by therapeutic drug monitoring and bayesian parameter estimates in 39 dialysis patients. The mean (± SD) trough level in 7 patients receiving only the conventional dosage regimen was significantly lower than in 17 patients strictly treated by the modified schedule (7 ± 4 versus 17 ± 8 mg/L; p = 0.001). The corresponding peaks were low in both groups and no different (23 ± 10 versus 27 ± 12 mg/L). The one week average vancomycin clearance was significantly lower in the conventional dosage group compared to the modified dosage group (6 ± 3 versus 10 ± 3 ml/min; p = 0.001). High-flux dialysers were not used in the conventional dosage group but for 30 percent of the procedures in the modified dosage group, where the vancomycin one week average elimination half-life was 66 hours (± 18) and the volume of distribution 50 litres (± 5). As compared to the bayesian programme, NONMEM calculated comparable pharmacokinetic parameters but could be applied only in 5 cases with a sufficient number of concentration measurements. Ototoxicity occurred in 1 patient, whereas vancomycin treatment was judged as ineffective against infection in 5 of the 39 patients. Their troughs were below 15 mg/L. The apparent tendency toward underdosage can be avoided by giving haemodialysis patients the modified vancomycin schedule (3 × 500 mg/week) with the higher trough levels considered therapeutic (10 - 20 mg/L).

Pharmacokinetic Dosing Algorithms

Pharmacokinetic algorithms for dosing range from practical nomograms and formulas to conventional or Bayesian, weighted, least-squares regression methods that adapt parameter-values to concentration data. Choice of an algorithm depends on the degree of risk from undertreatment and overtreatment, the availability of measurable, pharmacodynamic endpoints to guide dosage selection during treatment, and the level of effort needed to ensure safe and effective therapy. The concept of pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic dosing is introduced, and characteristic pharmacokinetic dosing algorithms are presented along with their limitations.

Initial dose of vancomycin based on body weight and creatinine clearance to minimize inadequate trough levels in Japanese adults

Our aims were to elucidate the factors that affected vancomycin (VCM) serum trough levels and to find the optimal initial dose based on creatinine clearance (CrCl) and body weight (BW) to minimize inadequate trough levels in a retrospective observational study among Japanese adults. One hundred and six inpatients, in whom VCM trough levels were measured after completing the third dosing, were consecutively recruited into our study in a tertiary hospital. We considered the frequency of <30% as low. In the generalized linear model, initial VCM total daily dose, CrCl, and BW were independent risk factors of VCM trough levels. In patients with CrCl ≥30 and <50 mL/min, 1 g/day yielded low frequencies of a trough level of ≥20 mcg/mL, regardless of BW. In patients with CrCl ≥50 mL/min, 2 g/day yielded low frequencies of a trough level of <10 mcg/mL in patients weighing <55 kg, but not in patients weighing ≥55 kg. Optimal VCM initial total daily dose may be 1 g/day in patients with CrCl ≥30 and <50 mL/min regardless of BW and 2 g/day in patients weighing <55 kg with CrCl ≥50 mL/min among Japanese adults.

Vancomycin

This review describes the use of vancomycin in neonates over the last three decades. Given the relation of late-onset neonatal septicaemia to outcome and the increase in coagulase-negative staphylococcal infection as causative organism, vancomycin remains an important antibacterial in the neonatal intensive care unit. The pharmacokinetic behaviour of vancomycin in neonates can be adequately described by a one- or two-compartment model and is mainly determined by postconceptional age and renal function. In neonates, a patent ductus arteriosus as well as treatment with indomethacin or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) leads to an increase in volume of distribution and a decrease in clearance. Microbiological studies in vitro have shown that an increase in vancomycin concentrations above the minimum inhibitory concentration does not result in more effective killing. The microbiological and clinical efficacy of vancomycin in neonates has only been studied explicitly in a restricted number of patients. There are no definitive data relating serum concentrations to effect in this patient group. Vancomycin-related nephrotoxicity and ototoxicity in neonates is rare, and no clear relation to serum concentrations has been demonstrated. Based on the pharmacokinetic profile of vancomycin in neonates, several administration regimens have been constructed. Recent guidelines have suggested that dosage can be independent of gestational age or postconceptional age in neonates without renal failure. In patients with renal failure, therapy can be adequately tailored by using a regimen based on serum creatinine. The usefulness of routine monitoring of peak serum concentrations is doubtful based on the current literature. Recent research demonstrates a shift towards taking only routine trough serum concentrations in order to optimise efficacy. Patients with renal failure and other special subpopulations, such as patients exposed to ECMO or indomethacin, need to be monitored more closely.

Mississippi mud no more: cost-effectiveness of pharmacokinetic dosage adjustment of vancomycin to prevent nephrotoxicity

OBJECTIVE

To determine the cost-effectiveness of pharmacokinetic dosage adjustment of vancomycin to prevent nephrotoxicity. An analysis was performed for subpopulations of patients receiving nephrotoxic agents (aminoglycosides, amphotericin, and acyclovir), those in the intensive care unit, and those on the oncology service.

METHODS

Decision analysis was used to model the cost-effectiveness of pharmacokinetic dosage adjustment of vancomycin. The reference case was determined, in part, by a retrospective review of 200 patients randomly selected from our clinical pharmacology consultation service. Patients were aged 18 years or older and had received intravenous vancomycin for at least 48 hours, with at least two--one peak and one trough--vancomycin serum concentrations obtained during therapy. Results of published clinical trials were used to determine the probability of vancomycin-induced nephrotoxicity.

RESULTS

The mean cost of treating nephrotoxicity was 11,233 dollars at our institution. The mean cost for all patients was 25,166 dollars (sensitivity analysis 15,000-27,500 dollars)/nephrotoxic episode prevented. The subgroup analysis revealed a cost of 8,363 dollars (sensitivity analysis 4,368-10,500 dollars)/nephrotoxic episode prevented in intensive care patients, 5,000 dollars (sensitivity analysis 1,687-13,250 dollars ) in oncology patients, and a dominant strategy showing a cost savings of 5,564 dollars (sensitivity analysis 2,724-12,428 dollars) in those receiving concomitant nephrotoxins.

CONCLUSION

Although pharmacokinetic monitoring and dosage adjustment are effective methods for reducing the toxicity of many drugs, controversy exists regarding the necessity of such monitoring with vancomycin. Evaluation by decision analysis over a range of assumptions, varying probabilities, and costs reveals that pharmacokinetic monitoring and vancomycin dosage adjustment to prevent nephrotoxicity are not cost-effective for all patients. However, such dosage adjustment demonstrates cost-effectiveness for patients receiving concomitant nephrotoxins, intensive care patients, and probably oncology patients.

Pharmacokinetic aspects of treating infections in the intensive care unit: focus on drug interactions

Pharmacokinetic interactions involving anti-infective drugs may be important in the intensive care unit (ICU). Although some interactions involve absorption or distribution, the most clinically relevant interactions during anti-infective treatment involve the elimination phase. Cytochrome P450 (CYP) 1A2, 2C9, 2C19, 2D6 and 3A4 are the major isoforms responsible for oxidative metabolism of drugs. Macrolides (especially troleandomycin and erythromycin versus CYP3A4), fluoroquinolones (especially enoxacin, ciprofloxacin and norfloxacin versus CYP1A2) and azole antifungals (especially fluconazole versus CYP2C9 and CYP2C19, and ketoconazole and itraconazole versus CYP3A4) are all inhibitors of CYP-mediated metabolism and may therefore be responsible for toxicity of other coadministered drugs by decreasing their clearance. On the other hand, rifampicin is a nonspecific inducer of CYP-mediated metabolism (especially of CYP2C9, CYP2C19 and CYP3A4) and may therefore cause therapeutic failure of other coadministered drugs by increasing their clearance. Drugs frequently used in the ICU that are at risk of clinically relevant pharrmacokinetic interactions with anti-infective agents include some benzodiazepines (especially midazolam and triazolam), immunosuppressive agents (cyclosporin, tacrolimus), antiasthmatic agents (theophylline), opioid analgesics (alfentanil), anticonvulsants (phenytoin, carbamazepine), calcium antagonists (verapamil, nifedipine, felodipine) and anticoagulants (warfarin). Some lipophilic anti-infective agents inhibit (clarithromycin, itraconazole) or induce (rifampicin) the transmembrane transporter P-glycoprotein, which promotes excretion from renal tubular and intestinal cells. This results in a decrease or increase, respectively, in the clearance of P-glycoprotein substrates at the renal level and an increase or decrease, respectively, of their oral bioavailability at the intestinal level. Hydrophilic anti-infective agents are often eliminated unchanged by renal glomerular filtration and tubular secretion, and are therefore involved in competition for excretion. Beta-lactams are known to compete with other drugs for renal tubular secretion mediated by the organic anion transport system, but this is frequently not of major concern, given their wide therapeutic index. However, there is a risk of nephrotoxicity and neurotoxicity with some cephalosporins and carbapenems. Therapeutic failure with these hydrophilic compounds may be due to haemodynamically active coadministered drugs, such as dopamine, dobutamine and furosemide, which increase their renal clearance by means of enhanced cardiac output and/or renal blood flow. Therefore, coadministration of some drugs should be avoided, or at least careful therapeutic drug monitoring should be performed when available. Monitoring may be especially helpful when there is some coexisting pathophysiological condition affecting drug disposition, for example malabsorption or marked instability of the systemic circulation or of renal or hepatic function.

Fluorescence polarization immunoassay: can it result in an overestimation of vancomycin in patients not suffering from renal failure?

It has been reported in scientific data that fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA) results in overestimation of vancomycin in patients with renal failure. This overestimation is caused by interference of the degradation product, CDP-1, in this assay. Increases in vancomycin levels have also been reported in patients not suffering from renal failure (nonrenal failure patients) who are receiving vancomycin therapy for approximately 10 days or more. The authors tested whether this increase in vancomycin in nonrenal failure patients is a result of CDP-1 interfering with FPIA or a change in the pharmacokinetics of the drug. Serum vancomycin peak and trough samples were obtained from 10 adult (mean age +/- SD: 55.9 years +/- 17.5) nonrenal failure patients (mean ClCr +/- SD: 76.2 mL/min +/- 29.20) receiving vancomycin therapy for at least 10 days. These peaks and troughs were obtained at steady state and again at approximately 10 days of therapy. All serum samples were analyzed initially by fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA, TDx) (Abbot Diagnostics; Irving, TX) and again by enzyme multiplied immunoassay (EMIT Vancomycin Assay) (Dade Behring; San Jose, CA). Statistical analysis (Wilcoxon signed-rank test) determined that there was no difference between the values obtained from the two assays. This demonstrates that the increase in vancomycin levels is not caused by the accumulation of CDP-1 and may be the result of a change in the pharmacokinetics of the drug.

Binding interactions of vancomycin tracers with a bacterial cell wall peptidoglycan analogue

Binding interactions between several vancomycin tracers and (N,N'-diacetyl)KDADA in solution were evaluated in a competition format using a surface plasmon resonance instrument. Tracers derivatized from the carboxy terminus or the N-vancosaminyl sugar moiety of vancomycin bind the peptide with an affinity similar to that of underivatized vancomycin. In contrast, N-methylleucyl derivatized vancomycin tracers bind the peptide with a reduced affinity relative to vancomycin.

Methods for clinical monitoring of cyclosporin in transplant patients

Cyclosporin was introduced into clinical practice in the early 1980s and has since been shown to prolong survival for transplant recipients. Because cyclosporin is a narrow therapeutic index drug and there are significant consequences associated with 'subtherapeutic' and 'supratherapeutic' concentrations, cyclosporin therapy is monitored as part of routine patient follow-up. However, the optimal method for the therapeutic drug monitoring of cyclosporin has yet to be defined. Currently, the most common method involves monitoring pre-dose trough concentrations, but this method is less than ideal. Other methods of monitoring cyclosporin therapy include monitoring the area under the concentration-time curve, limited sampling strategies, monitoring of single concentrations other than troughs and pharmacodynamic monitoring. Bayesian forecasting has been used successfully in clinical practice with other drugs with narrow therapeutic indices. However, few studies are available regarding Bayesian forecasting and cyclosporin. Existing studies are preliminary in nature and involve the old Sandimmun formulation rather than the Neoral formulation. Although these methods show promise, they have not gained widespread acceptance. This is because of their impracticality and the lack of prospective studies comparing other monitoring methods with trough concentration monitoring. Further comparative studies evaluating the impact of the specific monitoring method on definite patient outcomes are warranted.

Pharmacokinetics and dose requirements of vancomycin in neonates

AIMS

To design and evaluate dosing guidelines for vancomycin based on data collected during routine use of the drug.

METHODS

Following the observation that 66% of neonatal vancomycin trough concentrations were outside the target range, new dose guidelines were developed using a population pharmacokinetic approach. NONMEM (non-linear mixed effects model) was used to analyse dose histories and 347 concentration measurements collected during routine therapeutic drug monitoring in 59 neonates.

RESULTS

Postconceptual ages in the patient group ranged from 26-45 weeks, weights from 0. 57-4.23 kg, and creatinine concentrations from 18-172 micromol/l. The population estimate of vancomycin clearance (l/h/kg) was 3. 56/creatinine concentration (micromol/l) with an interpatient coefficient of variation (CV) of 22% and volume of distribution 0.67 l/kg with a CV of 18%. Residual error was 4.5 mg/l. When the new recommendations on dosing were used prospectively in a separate group of neonates the proportion of acceptable troughs increased from 33% to 72%.

CONCLUSIONS

The pharmacokinetics of vancomycin in neonates and young infants depend on weight and serum creatinine. Preliminary results from the new guidelines indicate an improvement on previous practice, but also an ongoing need to monitor concentrations.

Implications of vancomycin degradation products on therapeutic drug monitoring in patients with end-stage renal disease

In renally impaired patients, vancomycin concentrations typically are maintained at body temperature for extended periods of time due to the drug's prolonged half-life. Both time and increased temperature potentiate production of vancomycin crystalline degradation products (CDP-1). Commercially available vancomycin assays, such as fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPI) and radioimmunoassay, cross-react with CDP-1 isomers. Overestimation of vancomycin concentrations by 40-53% due to cross-reactivity of CDP-1 with active factor B vancomycin occurs with FPI. As FPI is the most common method of analyzing serum vancomycin, clinicians must be aware of its potential shortcomings and be prepared to alter vancomycin dosages in renally impaired patients. The possibility of adverse affects due to elevated concentrations of CDP-1 or therapeutic failures due to subtherapeutic levels of factor B vancomycin cannot be excluded.

Lack of vancomycin-associated nephrotoxicity in newborn infants: a case-control study

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare the incidence of nephrotoxicity, defined as doubling of baseline serum creatinine concentration, in newborn infants with peak vancomycin serum concentrations </=40 microg/mL at steady state to infants with peak vancomycin serum concentrations >40 microg/mL. A secondary objective was to correlate concomitant disease states and potentially nephrotoxic drug therapy with rises in serum creatinine in vancomycin recipients.

METHODS

Newborn infants with culture-proven Staphylococcus aureus or coagulase-negative staphylococcal septicemia who received vancomycin therapy for >3 days between 1985 and 1995 were identified from an existing database and a review of medical record. All 69 patients included in the study had serial serum creatinine determinations, including a baseline value within 48 hours of starting treatment with vancomycin, and serum vancomycin concentrations determined after at least three doses, with peak and trough concentrations determined 1 hour after a 60-minute infusion and 15 to 30 minutes before a dose, respectively. Infants with congenital renal or cardiac anomalies were excluded. Demographic characteristics, vancomycin dosing regimen, serum vancomycin concentrations and sample times, concomitant drug therapy, and disease states were recorded. Patients were divided into group A (peak vancomycin concentration </=40 microg/mL) and group B (peak vancomycin concentration >40 microg/mL). The change in serum creatinine concentration between the start and end of vancomycin therapy was determined. Nephrotoxicity was identified if serum creatinine doubled at any time from the start to the end of vancomycin therapy. Alternative definitions of nephrotoxicity (any rise in serum creatinine to >0.6 mg/dL or new abnormalities of urine sediment) were used in additional analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 69 evaluable patients (gestational age, 28.9 +/- 3.0 weeks; birth weight, 1219 +/- 516 g) were identified, 61 in group A and 8 in group B. Six patients in group A underwent doubling of serum creatinine concentration during vancomycin therapy, whereas none in group B did so. Serum creatinine doubled to >0.6 mg/dL in only 3 infants (all in group A). Any increase in serum creatinine to >0.6 mg/dL was seen in 10 infants, 9 of whom were in group A. No confounding variable, including previous or concomitant underlying disease states associated with renal dysfunction or treatment with other potentially nephrotoxic agents, were associated with a significant rise in serum creatinine.

CONCLUSION

Vancomycin-associated nephrotoxicity is rare in neonates, even with serum peak concentrations >40 microg/mL.

Laboratory guidelines for monitoring of antimicrobial drugs

Few antimicrobial drugs meet the requirements for therapeutic drug monitoring. Those that are monitored include the aminoglycosides (gentamicin, tobramycin, and amikacin), chloramphenicol, and in some cases, vancomycin. For these drugs, there is evidence of a relationship between serum concentration, efficacy, and/or the incidence of adverse or toxic events. Monitoring begins with the appropriate timing of collection and continues through the analytical process to the integration of all data used to guide the clinician’s next decision.

Population pharmacokinetics of vancomycin in Japanese adult patients

Population pharmacokinetic parameters of vancomycin (VCM) in Japanese adult patients infected with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) were estimated using 1253 items of serum concentration data from 190 patients obtained in routine drug monitoring. The two-compartment linear model was adopted, and VCM clearance (CL) was correlated with the creatinine clearance (CLcr), which was observed or estimated by the Cockcroft-Gault equation. The population pharmacokinetic analysis program NONMEM with first-order conditional estimation method was used. The results showed VCM clearance to be linearly correlated with CLcr (CL [ml/min] = 0.797 x CLcr) when the estimated CLcr was <85 ml/min, but no linear relationship at higher than this level because of the lack of accuracy in the CLcr estimates. The interindividual variability of CL was 38.5%; K12 and K21 were 0.525 hr(-1) and 0.213 hr(-1), respectively. The distribution volume at steady state (V[SS]) was 60.71, with no significant dependence on the actual body weight. The interindividual variability of Vss was 25.4%. The calculated half-life (t1/2,beta) in a typical patient with CLcr of 85 ml/minute was 12.8 hours. Residual variability was 23.7%. These results were compared to those of healthy volunteers, and guidelines for dosage adjustment in VCM therapy are discussed.

Development of a quantitative vancomycin immunoassay for the Abbott AxSYM analyzer

A novel fluorescence polarization immunoassay for vancomycin on Abbott AxSYM analyzer is described. The immunoassay allows for the accurate quantification of vancomycin in the presence of the crystalline degradation product (CDP). It displays dilution linearity from 1.0 microg/ml to 100.0 microg/ml, coefficients of variation ranging from 2.94% to 4.26%, recovery from 98% to 105%, and a sensitivity of <2.0 microg/ml. The assay demonstrates no cross-reactivity to crystalline degradation product, and to commonly-prescribed and over-the-counter drugs, as well as a minimum interference from endogenous substances.

Pharmacokinetics of drugs used in critically ill adults

Critically ill patients exhibit a range of organ dysfunctions and often require treatment with a variety of drugs including sedatives, analgesics, neuromuscular blockers, antimicrobials, inotropes and gastric acid suppressants. Understanding how organ dysfunction can alter the pharmacokinetics of drugs is a vital aspect of therapy in this patient group. Many drugs will need to be given intravenously because of gastrointestinal failure. For those occasions on which the oral route is possible, bioavailability may be altered by hypomotility, changes in gastrointestinal pH and enteral feeding. Hepatic and renal dysfunction are the primary determinants of drug clearance, and hence of steady-state drug concentrations, and of efficacy and toxicity in the individual patient. Oxidative metabolism is the main clearance mechanism for many drugs and there is increasing recognition of the importance of decreased activity of the hepatic cytochrome P450 system in critically ill patients. Renal failure is equally important with both filtration and secretion clearance mechanisms being required for the removal of parent drugs and their active metabolites. Changes in the steady-state volume of distribution are often secondary to renal failure and may lower the effective drug concentrations in the body. Failure of the central nervous system, muscle, the endothelial system and endocrine system may also affect the pharmacokinetics of specific drugs. Time-dependency of alterations in pharmacokinetic parameters is well documented for some drugs. Understanding the underlying pathophysiology in the critically ill and applying pharmacokinetic principles in selection of drug and dose regimen is, therefore, crucial to optimising the pharmacodynamic response and outcome.

Vancomycin monitoring: one or two serum levels?

Based on the principle that vancomycin therapy requires sustained therapeutic concentrations while avoiding high peaks, some authors reported that optimal vancomycin levels could be ensured by measuring trough levels alone (Cmin). The aim of this work was to assess the performance of a one-compartment Bayesian forecasting method for estimating vancomycin 2 hours after infusion (C2h) and mean vancomycin concentration in steady state (Cavgss) on the basis of a single trough sample (Cmin), in different conditions (steady state, patient renal function, and age), and according to clinical significance. Vancomycin serum concentrations (n = 108) were analyzed by fluorescence polarization immunoassay, from 79 adult patients. The predictive performance of the Bayesian method was determined by calculating the mean prediction error (ME), the mean absolute error (MAE) and the root squared prediction error (RMSE). A linear regression analysis was carried out between estimated and observed concentrations. The predicted C2h were not significantly different from the observed, and the least biased (ME = -1.08) and most precise (MAE = 3.81) predictions were from patients with normal renal function and steady state conditions. In this population, the concordance in dosage recommendations with the data pair results was 75% of patients. The best correlation between observed and predicted concentrations was found for Cavgss (r = 0.94; p < 0.00005). Predictions of the Cavgss were more precise (ME = -0.54) and accurate (MAE = 1.74) than the C2h predictions. Vancomycin can be monitored by determining one level in steady state for most patients with normal renal function.

Drug administration in patients with renal insufficiency. Minimising renal and extrarenal toxicity

Renal insufficiency has been associated with an increased risk of adverse effects with many classes of medications. The risk of some, but not all, adverse effects has been linked to the patient's degree of residual renal function. This may be the result of inappropriate individualisation of those agents that are primarily eliminated by the kidney, or an alteration in the pharmacodynamic response as a result of renal insufficiency. The pathophysiological mechanism responsible for alterations in drug disposition, especially metabolism and renal excretion, is the accumulation of uraemic toxins that may modulate cytochrome P450 enzyme activity and decrease glomerular filtration as well as tubular secretion. The general principles to enhance the safety of drug therapy in patients with renal insufficiency include knowledge of the potential toxicities and interactions of the therapeutic agent, consideration of possible alternatives therapies and individualisation of drug therapy based on patient level of renal function. Although optimisation of the desired therapeutic outcomes are of paramount importance, additional pharmacotherapeutic issues for patients with reduced renal function are the prevention or minimisation of future acute or chronic nephrotoxic insults, as well as the severity and occurrence of adverse effects on other organ systems. Risk factors for the development of nephrotoxicity for selected high-risk therapies (e.g. aminoglycosides, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, ACE inhibitors and radiographic contrast media) are quite similar and include pre-existing renal insufficiency, concomitant administration of other nephrotoxins, volume depletion and concomitant hepatic disease or congestive heart failure. Investigations of prophylactic approaches to enhance the safety of these agents in patients with renal insufficiency have yielded inconsistent outcomes. Hydration with saline prior to drug exposure has given the most consistent benefit, while sodium loading and use of pharmacological interventions [e.g. furosemide (frusemide) dopomine/dobutamine, calcium antagonists and mannitol] have resulted in limited success. The mechanisms responsible for altered dynamic responses of some agents (benzodiazepines, theophylline, digoxin and loop diuretics) in renally compromised patients include enhanced receptor sensitivity secondary to the accumulation of endogenous uraemic toxins and competition for secretion to the renal tubular site of action. Application of the pharmacotherapeutic principles discussed into clinical practice will hopefully enhance the safety of these agents and optimise patient outcomes.

Influence of pharmacokinetic model on vancomycin peak concentration targets

The aim of this study was to adapt the vancomycin therapeutic range to the kinetic models usually employed in clinical settings (one- and two-compartment models). Estimates of vancomycin pharmacokinetic parameters were obtained for both models in 22 hematologically malignant patients on vancomycin treatment using two serum concentrations and a bayesian algorithm. From these individually estimated pharmacokinetic parameters, an estimation of the maximum (Cssmax), 2 h postinfusion (Css2), and minimum (Cssmin) steady-state vancomycin serum concentrations for the one- and two-compartment models was made for a fixed 30 mg/kg/day dose. The linear regression equations between the predicted Css2 and Cssmin for the one- and two-compartment models do not differ significantly from the identity line, whereas the corresponding equation for Cssmax points to a 61% underestimation of Cssmax when the one-compartment model is used. From this latter regression equation, it is possible to define 20 mg/L (range of 18-21 mg/L) as a target Cssmax vancomycin serum concentration when a one-compartment model is used to monitor vancomycin therapy. Another practical approach would be to define the target concentration by a desired range at 2 h, which corresponds to a Cssmax value of 30-40 mg/L.

Impact of vancomycin therapeutic drug monitoring on patient care

OBJECTIVE

To document differences in the outcome of vancomycin therapy in patients managed through a therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) service and patients managed empirically, without the participation of a TDM service.

DESIGN

Prospective, cohort study.

SETTING

An 1100-bed, tertiary-care, teaching hospital.

PATIENTS

Those who received vancomycin for more than four days, were at least 18 years old, had an estimated creatinine clearance of more than 0.33 mL/s (20 mL/min), were not neutropenic at the start of vancomycin therapy, and were not treated in a critical care unit were enrolled in the study. A total of 116 patients (61 TDM; 55 non-TDM) were monitored prospectively from June 1990 through March 1991.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients in the TDM group had vancomycin drug therapy monitored daily by a pharmacist and vancomycin dosages adjusted following a pharmacokinetic analysis of vancomycin serum concentrations. For patients in the non-TDM group, the pharmacist only completed a data collection form. The patients and physicians were unaware of the monitoring.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Duration of therapy, total vancomycin dosage, infection site, concomitant antibiotics, body temperature, and white blood cell counts were compared between the two groups. Length of stay data were also compared. Nephrotoxicity was evaluated by comparing serum creatinine concentration and estimated creatinine clearance.

RESULTS

TDM of vancomycin appeared to reduce the incidence of vancomycin-related renal insufficiency (TDM 7 percent; non-TDM 24 percent). Patients managed through the TDM service received an average of 5 g less of vancomycin than did the patients in the non-TDM group. The duration of vancomycin therapy was an average of 2 days less for patients in the TDM group. Mean length of stay was 38.0 days for the TDM group and 44.5 days for the non-TDM group. Other measures of efficacy, infection site, and concomitant antibiotics were the same for both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

TDM of vancomycin was associated with fewer cases of vancomycin-related renal insufficiency. Vancomycin efficacy was not compromised by TDM. Provision of TDM for vancomycin therapy aided in patient management.

Glycopeptides and nephrotoxicity

Infections due to Gram-positive bacteria have become an increasing problem in the ICU. Furthermore, multidrug resistance among Gram-positive pathogens is increasingly recognized. Empirical therapy with antibiotic regimens that are effective against Gram-positive pathogens is often required in the ICU. Many critically ill patients in the ICU have multiorgan system failure, including acute renal failure, which further impedes optimal antimicrobial therapy. In this communication, the use of glycopeptides in the ICU is briefly reviewed, and the occurrence of associated nephrotoxicity during therapy with vancomycin or teicoplanin, alone or in combination with an aminoglycoside, is examined. Finally, existing recommendations regarding the dose regimens of these agents in patients with renal impairment are evaluated, and guide-lines for optimizing glycopeptide therapy through improved pharmacokinetic monitoring are presented.

Prediction of acetaminophen concentrations in overdose patients using a Bayesian pharmacokinetic model

A pharmacokinetic program using population-based parameter estimates and a Bayesian forecasting model was retrospectively evaluated for predicting acetaminophen serum concentrations in overdose patients. Dynamic disposition factors known to affect acetaminophen disposition (emesis, activated charcoal, N-acetylcysteine, etc.) were included in the program. Twenty six patients who reported an acetaminophen ingestion of at least 70 mg/kg within 24 h of presentation to the hospital and had at least one measured acetaminophen concentration were included. Prediction of initial acetaminophen concentrations using only population-based parameter estimates resulted in a percent mean error (%ME) and percent mean absolute error (%MAE) of 9.3 and 42.2, respectively. Using only the initial concentration as feedback, the Bayesian forecasting model accurately predicted the second acetaminophen concentration (%ME = 4.0, %MAE = 23.6). The Bayesian model also accurately predicted all concentrations within 8 h of the ingestion (%ME = 10.6, %MAE = 24.0). The prediction of concentrations between 2 to 4 h and 4 to 4.5 h after ingestion with only population-based parameter estimates resulted in %ME of 17.0 and 13.2, respectively, and %MAE of 36.5 and 35.1, respectively. Our data suggests that acetaminophen serum concentrations occurring within the first 4.5 h after ingestion can be reliably predicted by the set of population-based parameter estimates evaluated. Once a single acetaminophen concentration is available, the Bayesian forecasting model can accurately predict subsequent concentrations within the first 8 h after an acetaminophen ingestion.

Effect of obesity on vancomycin pharmacokinetic parameters as determined by using a Bayesian forecasting technique

Few data exist concerning the effect of obesity on the pharmacokinetic parameters of vancomycin. The purpose of this investigation was to assess the effect of obesity on vancomycin pharmacokinetic parameters in 95 nonobese and 135 obese adult patients (age range, 18 to 92 years) receiving vancomycin. All subjects had normal renal function as defined by a creatinine concentration in serum of < or = 1.5 mg/dl (mean estimated creatinine clearance +/- 1 standard deviation, 76 +/- 34; range, 23 to 215 ml/min). Vancomycin concentrations in serum were determined by the fluorescence polarization immunoassay. All data for vancomycin concentration in serum versus time for each course of therapy were fitted by using a two-compartment Bayesian forecasting program. Subjects were stratified into nine groups on the basis of the percent difference between actual body weight (ABW) and lean body weight (LBW) (> -10%, -10 to 0%, > 0 to 10%, > 10 to 20%, > 20 to 30%, > 30 to 40%, > 40 to 50%, > 50 to 60%, > 60%). Analysis of variance with post hoc Scheffe's testing revealed that statistically significant differences occurred in terminal disposition half-life (t1/2 beta) between the extremes of modestly obese (group 4) and morbidly obese (group 9, P < 0.05) patients. Similar analysis with distribution volume (V) identified significant differences in patients at or near their LBW (groups 2 to 4) and patients who were morbidly obese (groups 8 and 9, P < 0.05). Multiple regression models for the pharmacokinetic parameters V, t1/2beta, and vancomycin total body clearance were developed to assess the joint predictive power of LBW, ABW, and percent over LBW, controlling for the effects of age, initial creatinine concentration in serum, initial creatinine clearance, and gender. In the final model for V, both ABW and percent over LBW were independent and significant predictors. For total body clearance, only ABW was significant and predictive. Percent over LBW was a significant and independent predictor of t1/2beta. LBW is not predictive of these pharmacokinetic parameters and should not be used for initial dosing. On the basis of these data, ABW appears to be superior to LBW for calculating initial dose requirements for vancomycin.

Bayesian parameter estimation and population pharmacokinetics

The widespread application of Bayesian parameter estimation in the area of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has prompted the need for well conducted population studies to obtain relevant prior pharmacokinetic parameter estimates. In many cases the population has consisted of a relatively small number of subjects. This may be unavoidable for drugs used in cancer chemotherapy or in small, specific populations of patients. In contrast, information about drugs which are used extensively, such as the aminoglycosides, can be obtained by population studies which involve a large number of individuals. Indeed, this technique has proved particularly useful for determining parameter estimates which can be employed in neonatal TDM. Bayesian parameter estimation has been most frequently used for drugs with narrow therapeutic ranges such as the aminoglycosides, cyclosporin, digoxin, anticonvulsants (especially phenytoin), lithium and theophylline. However, the technique has now been extended to cytotoxic drugs, Factor VIII and warfarin. Bayesian methods have also been used to limit the number of samples required in more conventional pharmacokinetic studies with new drugs. Further advances in the use of these methods are likely to include measures of drug response and toxicity requiring population studies which also include relevant pharmacodynamic information.