The relationship between systemic exposure to fluticasone propionate and cortisol reduction in healthy male volunteers

A Randomized Comparison of the Pharmacokinetics and Bioavailability of Fluticasone Propionate Delivered via Xhance Exhalation Delivery System Versus Flonase Nasal Spray and Flovent HFA Inhalational Aerosol

PURPOSE

The exhalation delivery system with fluticasone propionate (Xhance®) has been shown to deliver drug substantially more broadly in the nasal cavity (particularly into superior/posterior regions), with less off-target loss of drug to drip-out and swallowing, than conventional nasal sprays. This open-label study evaluated the systemic bioavailability of Xhance® by comparing the pharmacokinetic (PK) properties of a single dose of fluticasone from 3 products administering the drug using 3 different devices: Xhance®, Flonase® (fluticasone propionate inhalational nasal spray), and Flovent® HFA (fluticasone propionate inhalational aerosol).

METHODS

This open-label study was conducted in 2 parts. Study part 1 compared systemic exposure with a single dose of Xhance® 186 or 372 μg versus Flonase® 400 μg (3-way, 3-treatment, 3-sequence, randomized crossover in healthy subjects; n = 90). A separate study, part 2, under the same umbrella protocol, compared systemic exposure with Xhance® 372 μg versus Flovent® HFA 440 μg (2-way, 2-treatment, 2-sequence, randomized crossover in patients with mild to moderate asthma; n = 30).

FINDINGS

With Xhance® 186 μg, the geometric least squares mean (LSM) C_max was higher than with Flonase® 400 μg (16.02 vs 11.66 pg/mL, respectively; geometric mean ratio [GMR], 137.42%) and the geometric LSM AUC_0-∞ values were similar (97.30 vs 99.61 pg · h/mL; GMR, 97.78%). With Xhance® 372 μg, the geometric LSM C_max and AUC_0-∞ were higher than with Flonase® 400 μg (C_max, 23.50 vs 11.66 pg/mL [GMR, 201.53%]; AUC_0-∞, 146.61 vs 99.61 pg · h/mL [GMR, 147.19%]). In part 2, the geometric LSM C_max and AUC_0-∞ values were lower with Xhance® 372 μg than with Flovent® HFA 440 μg (C_max, 25.28 vs 40.02 pg/mL [GMR, 63.18%]; AUC_0-∞, 205.78 vs 415.16 pg · h/mL [GMR, 49.57%]).

IMPLICATIONS

Similar intranasal doses of Xhance® (372 μg) and Flonase® (400 μg) are clearly not bioequivalent. Systemic exposure is very low with all products. Systemic exposure is higher with Xhance® than with Flonase® and substantially lower than with Flovent® HFA 440 μg and, based on dose normalization, Flovent® HFA 220 μg. ClincalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02266927.

Scientific Rationale for Determining the Bioequivalence of Inhaled Drugs

In recent years, pathways for the development and approval of bioequivalent inhaled products have been established for regulated markets, including the European Union (EU), and a number of orally inhaled products (OIPs) have been approved in the EU solely on the basis of in vitro and pharmacokinetic data. This review describes how these development pathways are structured and their implications for the treatment of airway diseases such as asthma. The EU guidance follows a stepwise approach that includes in vitro criteria as the first step. If all in vitro criteria are not met, the second step is based on pharmacokinetic evaluations, which include assessments of lung and systemic bioavailability. If all pharmacokinetic criteria are not met, the third step is based on clinical endpoint studies. In this review, the scientific rationale of the European Medicines Agency guidance for the development of bioequivalent OIPs is reviewed with the focus on the development of bioequivalent OIPs in the EU. Indeed, we discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the weight-of-evidence and stepwise approaches. The evidence indicates that the EU guidance is robust and, unlike clinical endpoint studies, the pharmacokinetic studies are far more sensitive to measure the minor differences, i.e. deposition and absorption rates, in drug delivery from the test and reference products and, thus, should be best suited for assessing bioequivalence. The acceptance range of the 90% confidence intervals for pharmacokinetic bioequivalence (i.e. 80-125% for both the area under the plasma concentration-time curve and maximum plasma concentration) represent appropriately conservative margins for ensuring equivalent safety and efficacy of the test and reference products.

Batch-to-batch pharmacokinetic variability confounds current bioequivalence regulations: A dry powder inhaler randomized clinical trial

Current pharmacokinetic (PK) bioequivalence guidelines do not account for batch‐to‐batch variability in study design or analysis. Here we evaluate the magnitude of batch‐to‐batch PK variability for Advair Diskus 100/50. Single doses of fluticasone propionate and salmeterol combinations were administered by oral inhalation to healthy subjects in a randomized clinical crossover study comparing three different batches purchased from the market, with one batch replicated across two treatment periods. All pairwise comparisons between different batches failed the PK bioequivalence statistical test, demonstrating substantial PK differences between batches that were large enough to demonstrate bio‐inequivalence in some cases. In contrast, between‐replicate PK bioequivalence was demonstrated for the replicated batch. Between‐batch variance was ∼40–70% of the estimated residual error. This large additional source of variability necessitates re‐evaluation of bioequivalence assessment criteria to yield a result that is both generalizable and consistent with the principles of type I and type II error rate control.

Steroid treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis in adults

Topical steroid therapy has been used to treat eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) for more than 15 years. We review the treatment trials of topical steroid therapy in adult patients with EoE. Currently, there is no commercially available preparation designed to deliver the steroid to the esophagus. Current regimens consist of swallowing steroid preparations designed for inhalation treatment for asthma. In the short term, steroids are associated with an approximately 15% to 25% incidence of asymptomatic esophageal candidiasis, but otherwise appear to be well tolerated.

The relationship between fluticasone furoate systemic exposure and cortisol suppression

INTRODUCTION

The inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) fluticasone furoate is in development, in combination with the long-acting beta2-agonist vilanterol for the once-daily treatment of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and as a monotherapy treatment for asthma. Corticosteroids, including ICSs, have the potential to induce dose-dependent systemic effects on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. Cortisol suppression has been observed in asthma patients with normal HPA axis function at baseline on receiving high doses of ICSs, and is associated with adverse effects on a number of physiological processes. The measurement of 24-h serum cortisol and 24-h urinary cortisol excretion are sensitive methods for assessing adrenocortical activity, and can evaluate cortisol suppression in a dose-dependent manner.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the meta-analysis presented here was to characterize the population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationship between fluticasone furoate systemic exposure [as measured by area under the concentration-time curve over 24 h postdose (AUC24)] and both 24-h weighted mean serum cortisol (WM24) and 24-h urine cortisol excretion in healthy subjects and subjects with asthma.

METHODS

The serum cortisol meta-analysis integrated eight studies; five Phase I studies in healthy subjects, two Phase IIa studies, and one Phase III study in subjects with asthma. Each study included serial blood sampling for estimation of WM24. The urine cortisol meta-analysis integrated three studies: one Phase I study in healthy subjects, and one Phase IIb and one Phase III study in subjects with asthma. Each study included complete 0-24 h urine collection for estimation of urine cortisol excretion. All studies included blood sampling for estimation of fluticasone furoate AUC24. A sigmoid maximum effect (E max) model was fitted to fluticasone furoate AUC24 and serum cortisol and urine cortisol data using nonlinear mixed-effect modeling with the computer program NONMEM(®).

RESULTS

Over a wide range of systemic fluticasone furoate exposure representing the therapeutic and supratherapeutic range, the relationship between fluticasone furoate AUC24 and WM24 and 24-h urine cortisol excretion was well described by an E max model. The average estimate of AUC producing 50 % of maximum effect (AUC50) was similar for the serum cortisol and urine cortisol models with values of 1,556 and 1,686 pg · h/mL, respectively. Although formulation/inhaler was shown to be a significant covariate on the estimates of both WM24 at zero concentration (C0) and AUC50 in the serum cortisol model, the differences were small and believed to be due to study variability. Age was shown to be a significant covariate on the estimates of both C 0 and AUC50 in the urine cortisol model, and was considered to be a reflection of lower urine cortisol excretion in adolescents.

CONCLUSION

A pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model has been established over a wide range of systemic fluticasone furoate exposure representing the therapeutic and supratherapeutic range to both WM24 and 24-h urine cortisol excretion. The values of AUC50 of 1,556 and 1,686 pg·h/mL, respectively, are several times higher than average fluticasone furoate AUC24 values observed at clinical doses of fluticasone furoate (≤200 μg). The models predict a fluticasone furoate AUC24 of 1,000 pg·h/mL would be required to reduce 24-h serum cortisol or 24-h urine cortisol excretion by 20 and 17 %, respectively.

Bioavailability and disposition of azelastine and fluticasone propionate when delivered by MP29-02, a novel aqueous nasal spray

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT

• The topical second generation anti-histamine azelastine hydrochloride (AZE) and the potent corticosteroid fluticasone propionate (FP) are well established first-line treatments in allergic rhinitis (AR). • MP29-02, a novel intranasal AZE and FP formulation, has been shown to control AR symptoms faster and better than standard intranasal AZE or FP. • The systemic bioavailabilities of marketed AZE and FP nasal spray products have been established at about 40% and 1% only, respectively. • For new combination medicinal products such as MP29-02, the determination of possible pharmacokinetic (PK) drug-drug interactions between both active components and formulation-based bioavailability alterations is essential.

WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS

• This paper provides for the first time information on potential drug-drug interactions, AZE and FP bioavailability and disposition characteristics of each component administered by the novel nasal spray formulation MP29-02. • The studies employed highly sensitive FP and AZE LC-MS/MS assays and could therefore be conducted with recommended therapeutic doses, thereby circumventing previously recognized draw-backs that required nasal bioavailability studies to be conducted using supra-therapeutic doses. • No significant PK drug-drug interaction between the active components AZE and FP was noted for MP29-02. • AZE bioavailabilty was equivalent when MP29-02 data were compared with MP29-02-AZE-mono and Astelin®. • Increased FP exposure was observed with MP29-02-based products compared with FP-BI. FP serum concentrations were generally very low with all investigational products suggesting no clinically meaningful pharmacodynamic differences in terms of systemic safety.

AIM(S)

To determine azelastine hydrochloride (AZE) and fluticasone propionate (FP) bioavailabilities of the novel nasal spray combination product MP 29-02, compared with MP29-02-based products containing only AZE (MP29-02-AZE-mono), FP (MP29-02-FP-mono), marketed AZE and FP single entity products (Astelin® and FP Boehringer-Ingelheim; FP-BI).

METHODS

Two randomized, three period, six sequence, three treatment crossover studies were conducted in healthy subjects. Study 1 administered 200 µg FP as MP29-02, MP29-02-FP-mono or FP-BI. Study 2 administered 548 µg AZE as MP29-02, MP29-02-AZE-mono or Astelin®. Each dose consisted of two sprays/nostril. Serum FP and plasma AZE were followed over 24 (FP) and 120 h (AZE) and quantified by LC-MS/MS. Peak (C(max) ) and total exposures AUC(0,t(last) ) were compared between the treatments by anova.

RESULTS

Study 1: Average FP C(max) was very low with all products (≤ 10 pg ml(-1) ). FP AUC(0,t(last) ) point estimates (90% CIs) for MP29-02 : MP29-02-FP-mono and MP29-02 : FP-BI ratios (%) were 93.6 (83.6, 104.7) and 161.1 (137.1, 189.3). Corresponding ratios for C(max) were 91.0 (82.5, 100.4) and 157.4 (132.5, 187.1). Study 2: AZE AUC(0,t(last) ) point estimates (90% CIs) for MP29-02 : MP29-02-AZE-mono and MP29-02 : Astelin® ratios (%) were 98.8 (91.0, 107.4) and 105.5 (95.6, 116.4). Corresponding outcomes for C(max) were 102.7 (92.1, 114.4) and 107.3 (92.6, 124.3).

CONCLUSIONS

No interactions of AZE and FP were found with the MP29-02 formulation. Azelastine bioavailability was similar for MP29-02 and Astelin®. Maximum and total FP exposure was higher for MP29-02-based products compared with FP-BI. FP concentrations were generally very low with all investigational products and did not suggest clinically meaningful differences concerning systemic safety.

Equivalence considerations for orally inhaled products for local action-ISAM/IPAC-RS European Workshop report

The purpose of this article is to document the discussions at the 2010 European Workshop on Equivalence Determinations for Orally Inhaled Drugs for Local Action, cohosted by the International Society for Aerosols in Medicine (ISAM) and the International Pharmaceutical Consortium on Regulation and Science (IPAC-RS). The article summarizes current regulatory approaches in Europe, the United States, and Canada, and presents points of consensus as well as ongoing debate in the four major areas: in vitro testing, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies, and device similarity. Specific issues in need of further research and discussion are also identified.

From pharmacokinetics to therapeutics

Whilst pharmacokinetics describe the relationship between dose levels and concentration-time profiles of a drug in the body and pharmacodynamics describe the concentration-response relationships, pharmacokinectics-pharmacodynamics(PK-PD) models link these two items providing a framework for modelling the time course of drug response. In this chapter, PK-PD models, describing the therapeutic effects of drugs used for the therapy of allergic diseases have been reviewed. Emphasis was given also to the description of the receptor occupancy, which is tightly related to the downstream clinical response. PK - PD models describing unwanted effects were also commented. An integrated use of these models allows choosing appropriate dosing regimens and providing an objective evaluation of the benefit/risk balance.

Topical N-acetyl-S-farnesyl-L-cysteine inhibits mouse skin inflammation, and unlike dexamethasone, its effects are restricted to the application site

N-acetyl-S-farnesyl-L-cysteine (AFC), a modulator of G protein and G-protein coupled receptor signaling, inhibits neutrophil chemotaxis and other inflammatory responses in cell-based assays. Here, we show topical AFC inhibits in vivo acute inflammation induced by 12-O-tetradecanoyl-phorbol-13-acetate (TPA) and arachidonic acid using the mouse ear model of inflammation. AFC inhibits edema, as measured by ear weight, and also inhibits neutrophil infiltration as assayed by direct counting in histological sections and by measuring myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity as a neutrophil marker. In addition, AFC inhibits in vivo allergic contact dermatitis in a mouse model utilizing sensitization followed by a subsequent challenge with 2,4-dinitrofluorobenzene. Unlike the established anti-inflammatories dexamethasone and indomethacin, AFC's action was restricted to the site of application. In this mouse model, both dexamethasone and indomethacin inhibited TPA-induced edema and MPO activity in the vehicle-treated, contralateral ear. AFC showed no contralateral ear inhibition for either of these end points. A marginally significant decrease due to AFC treatment was seen in TPA-induced epidermal hyperplasia at 24 hours. This was much less than the 90% inhibition of neutrophil infiltration, suggesting that AFC does not act by directly inhibiting protein kinase C.

The efficacy and safety of fluticasone propionate in very young children with persistent asthma symptoms

We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fluticasone propionate (FP) in children aged 12-47 months with recurrent/persistent asthma symptoms. One hundred and sixty children (12-47 months) were randomised into this multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study, and treated with either FP (100 microg bd) or placebo (2 puffs bd), both administered by metered-dose-inhaler and Babyhaler for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was percentage of symptom-free 24h periods. Over weeks 1-12, FP-treated patients had significantly more percentage symptom-free 24-h periods compared with placebo (odds ratio 0.53; 95% CI 0.29-0.95; P = 0.035). Relative to baseline, where all patients were symptomatic for at least 21/28 days of the run-in, the improvement equated to one additional symptom-free 24 h period per week. FP patients also had a significantly higher percentage of 24 h periods with no wheeze or cough, the odds ratio for treatment difference corresponding to two additional wheeze-free and one additional cough-free periods per week. FP was well-tolerated, with similar reported adverse events in both groups. Urinary cortisol-creatinine ratio was slightly decreased among FP patients after 12 weeks, but with no clinical correlates. FP is effective for the treatment of chronic persistent asthma symptoms in very young children.

Relationship between systemic corticosteroid exposure and growth velocity: development and validation of a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model

BACKGROUND

Use of high-dose oral corticosteroids (CSs) can reduce growth velocity (GV) in children, whereas use of low-dose topical CSs has either no effect or transient effects on short-term growth and no effect on final adult height Despite the large body of literature on this topic, some fundamental questions remain concerning the relationship between CS exposure and growth effects.

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this study were to determine the relationship between CS exposure and GV in children receiving CS therapy for asthma or rhinitis, and to examine whether there is likely to be a link between GV and cortisol suppression.

METHODS

Data from 32 published studies of the effect on growth of inhaled, intranasal, and oral CSs, including delivery by dry powder inhaler, metered-dose inhaler, and aqueous nasal spray, were consolidated by expressing CS exposure in cortisol equivalents using a physiologically based pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic approach. The relationship between change in GV and CS exposure in cortisol equivalents was described using a nonlinear sigmoid maximum-effect (E(max)) model with the following parameters: E(max) = -5.9 cm/y; steady-state unbound AUC for 50% reduction in GV, in cortisol equivalents = 20,000 ng.h/L; Hill constant = 1.2; and change in GV at zero systemic exposure = 0.06 cm/y. Validation was achieved by comparing the model's predictions with data from 5 studies that were not included in the model development The model was also used to predict the potential of various CS regimens to reduce GV.

RESULTS

Exploratory data analysis established that change in GV was highly correlated with exposure in cortisol equivalents (P < 0.001). CSs with high systemic bioavailability by the intranasal route were predicted to have short-term growth effects exceeding the clinical equivalence limit for change in GV (+/-0.8 cm/y), whereas those with lower bioavailability were predicted to produce systemic exposures below the threshold for significant effects on GV The findings were similar for inhaled CSs and for regimens combining delivery by the intranasal and inhaled routes. In descending order, the model predicted the following ranking of the potential of the various intranasal, inhaled, and oral regimens to reduce GV, expressed as fractions or multiples of the pediatric dose (in microg/d): oral prednisolone 5000 microg/d, 0.14; inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate metered-dose inhaler 400 microg/d, 0.54; inhaled budesonide dry powder inhaler 400 microg/d, 0.66; intranasal triamcinolone acetonide aqueous nasal spray 220 microg/d, 0.74; inhaled triamcinolone acetonide metered-dose inhaler 400 microg/d, 0.75; intranasal beclomethasone dipropionate aqueous nasal spray 336 pg/d, 0.89; inhaled mometasone furoate dry powder inhaler 200 microg/d, 2.4; intranasal budesonide aqueous nasal spray 128 microg/d, 2.5; inhaled fluticasone propionate dry powder inhaler 200 microg/d, 2.6; intranasal mometasone furoate aqueous nasal spray 100 microg/d, 120; and intranasal fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray 100 pg/d, 150. Values >1 are predictive of no significant effect on GV. The model predicted that a 10% to 15% reduction in plasma cortisol concentration should be detectable at the lower equivalence limit for growth reduction (-0.8 cm/y). The validation procedure showed that the model was capable of predicting the results of the 5 comparative growth studies not included in model development with a correlation coefficient of 0.98.

CONCLUSIONS

Growth effects appear to be nonlinearly related to CS exposure; therefore, no-effect exposure should be possible for CSs with low systemic exposure. Growth inhibition appears unlikely to occur in the absence of detectable reductions in cortisol concentrations.

Designer glucocorticoids

Glucocorticoids are the most effective anti-inflammatory agents known. However, the use of these powerful molecules is plagued by a host of serious, sometimes life-threatening side-effects. The search for new compounds that maintain the efficacy of the steroids without some of the side-effects has entered a new phase. New approaches are leading to novel kinds of steroidal and non-steroidal compounds with unique profiles that may represent the next generation of safer glucocorticoids.

Pharmacokinetics of fluticasone propionate inhaled via the Diskhaler and Diskus powder devices in patients with mild-to-moderate asthma

OBJECTIVE

The aim of these studies was to compare the pharmacokinetics of inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP) after repeated administration via the Diskus or Diskhaler dry powder inhalers (DPIs) to patients with mild-to-moderate asthma.

METHODS

Both studies evaluated the pharmacokinetics of inhaled administration of FP via a DPI to patients with mild-to-moderate asthma, according to a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled design. In the first study, FP 100 microg or 500 microg was administered twice daily via the Diskhaler for 6 weeks and, in the second, FP 500 microg was administered via the Diskus or Diskhaler for 12 weeks.

RESULTS

In the first study, plasma FP concentrations could be detected consistently only with the higher dose; the lower dose produced concentrations close to or below the 0.025 microg/L quantification limit of the radioimmunoassay used. From detailed analysis of a subgroup of patients receiving the 500 microg dosage, steady-state plasma FP concentrations were attained within one week of commencing treatment. After 4 weeks, the maximum plasma FP concentration (Cmax) in this subgroup was 0.096 microg/L [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.066-0.141] and the area under the plasma FP concentration-time curve up to the last quantifiable concentration (AUClast) was 0.491 microg/L x h (95% CI: 0.256-0.940). The steady-state to single dose accumulation ratio for FP after twice-daily administration varied between patients: a ratio of approximately 1.7 was recorded after comparison of Cmax at week 4 and day 1. In the second study, the point estimate of the Diskus to Diskhaler ratio for Cmax in all patients was 0.91 (90% CI: 0.76-1.10) after 4 weeks' treatment. From a detailed analysis of a subgroup of patients, the corresponding ratio for AUClast at the same time point was 1.15 (90% CI: 0.69-1.94), indicating no significant difference in systemic exposure to FP between the 2 devices. Steady-state kinetics were achieved by week 1: the point estimate ratios of Cmax and AUClast at week 4 compared with week 1 were 0.88 (90% CI: 0.66-1.16) and 0.95 (90% CI: 0.66-1.36), respectively. Administration of FP via either DPI had no effect on plasma cortisol levels over the 12-hour postdose period.

CONCLUSION

In patients with asthma receiving repeated inhaled doses of FP, the systemic exposure (AUC) after inhalation from the Diskus was similar to that from the Diskhaler, with no difference between the DPIs in the effects on cortisol suppression. The 2 DPIs therefore have very similar pharmacokinetic profiles.

Comparison of the systemic availability of fluticasone propionate in healthy volunteers and patients with asthma

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this analysis was to compare the systemic exposure to inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP) after administration of either single or repeated dose regimens via dry powder and metered-dose inhalers in patients with asthma and healthy volunteers.

BACKGROUND

The pharmacokinetics of FP, a topically active glucocorticoid administered by inhalation for the treatment of asthma and rhinitis, are well characterised in healthy volunteers. As asthma is characterised by pathophysiological changes in the lung, it may be inappropriate to use data from studies in healthy volunteers to predict the deposition and absorption of FP in patients with asthma.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Pooled data from 13 pharmacokinetic studies showed that the systemic availability of FP (measured as area under the plasma FP concentration-time curve) after single or multiple administration by inhalation was 2 to 3 times lower in patients with asthma than in healthy volunteers. This observation correlated well with the systemic effects of FP in the 2 groups. Reduction in 24-hour urinary cortisol excretion after inhalation of FP (determined in 9 of the studies) was greater in healthy volunteers than in patients with asthma. The hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis suppression caused by systemic exposure to FP in adults with asthma is therefore substantially less than that in healthy volunteers.

CONCLUSION

Differences in the deposition of FP in the lungs of patients with asthma, probably caused by obstructed inspiratory airflow, may explain this observation.