Investigation of the mutual pharmacokinetic interactions between bosentan, a dual endothelin receptor antagonist, and simvastatin

Drug Interactions Associated With Therapies for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

Objective: To evaluate the potential for drug interactions with therapies for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Treatments include calcium channel blockers, phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors, endothelin receptor antagonists, guanylate cyclase stimulators, prostacyclin analogues, and prostacyclin receptor agonists. Data Sources: A systemic literature search (January 1980-December 2021) was performed using PubMed and EBSCO to locate relevant articles. The mesh terms used included each specific medication available as well as "drug interactions." DAILYMED was used for product-specific drug interactions. Study Selection and Data Extraction: The search was conducted to identify drug interactions with PAH treatments. The search was limited to those articles studying human applications with PAH treatments and publications using the English language. Case reports, clinical trials, review articles, treatment guidelines, and package labeling were selected for inclusion. Data Synthesis: Primary literature and package labeling indicate that PAH treatments are subject to pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions. The management of PAH is rapidly evolving. As more and more evidence becomes available for the use of combination therapy in PAH, the increasing use of combination therapy increases the risk of drug-drug interactions. Pulmonary arterial hypertension is also associated with other comorbidities that require concomitant pharmacotherapy. Conclusion: The available literature indicates that PAH therapies are associated with clinically significant drug interactions and the potential for subsequent adverse reactions. Clinicians in all practice settings should be mindful that increased awareness of drug interactions with PAH therapy will ensure optimal management and patient safety.

Inhibition and induction of CYP enzymes in humans: an update

The cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme family is the most important enzyme system catalyzing the phase 1 metabolism of pharmaceuticals and other xenobiotics such as herbal remedies and toxic compounds in the environment. The inhibition and induction of CYPs are major mechanisms causing pharmacokinetic drug–drug interactions. This review presents a comprehensive update on the inhibitors and inducers of the specific CYP enzymes in humans. The focus is on the more recent human in vitro and in vivo findings since the publication of our previous review on this topic in 2008. In addition to the general presentation of inhibitory drugs and inducers of human CYP enzymes by drugs, herbal remedies, and toxic compounds, an in-depth view on tyrosine-kinase inhibitors and antiretroviral HIV medications as victims and perpetrators of drug–drug interactions is provided as examples of the current trends in the field. Also, a concise overview of the mechanisms of CYP induction is presented to aid the understanding of the induction phenomena.

Impact of Disease and Treatment Response in Drug-Drug Interaction Studies: Osimertinib and Simvastatin in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

A phase I, open‐label study (NCT02197234) assessed the effects of osimertinib on simvastatin exposure in patients with advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)‐mutated non‐small cell lung cancer and disease progression post‐EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment. Here, we report on a retrospective analysis of two patients (patients 1 and 2) who had liver metastases and high simvastatin exposure prior to osimertinib treatment, which changed following treatment. Patients received single oral doses of simvastatin 40 mg on day (D) 1 and D31, and osimertinib 80 mg once daily on D3–32. At baseline, both patients had abnormal liver function tests (LFTs; Child‐Pugh scores of 6 and 8, respectively), significant liver metastasis, and, after a single simvastatin dose, had higher (~ 10‐fold) exposure compared with all other patients. Following 31 days of continuous osimertinib treatment, simvastatin exposures (area under the plasma concentration‐time curve from zero to infinity (AUC) and maximum plasma concentration (C_max)) and LFTs, such as alanine transaminase, aspartate aminotransferase, and bilirubin normalized to population mean values. Additionally, ~ 50% and ~ 80% reductions in liver metastases were observed on computed tomography scans in patients 1 and 2, respectively. High simvastatin exposure on D1 likely resulted from impairment of hepatic first pass metabolism due to liver metastases. Reduction in hepatic disease burden due to osimertinib treatment likely resulted in liver function returning to normal levels.

Clinical Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Profile of Riociguat

Oral riociguat is a soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC) stimulator that targets the nitric oxide (NO)–sGC–cyclic guanosine monophosphate pathway with a dual mode of action: directly by stimulating sGC, and indirectly by increasing the sensitivity of sGC to NO. It is rapidly absorbed, displays almost complete bioavailability (94.3%), and can be taken with or without food and as crushed or whole tablets. Riociguat exposure shows pronounced interindividual (60%) and low intraindividual (30%) variability in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) or chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), and is therefore administered using an individual dose-adjustment scheme at treatment initiation. The half-life of riociguat is approximately 12 h in patients and approximately 7 h in healthy individuals. Riociguat and its metabolites are excreted via both renal (33–45%) and biliary routes (48–59%), and dose adjustment should be performed with particular care in patients with moderate hepatic impairment or mild to severe renal impairment (no data exist for patients with severe hepatic impairment). The pharmacodynamic effects of riociguat reflect the action of a vasodilatory agent, and the hemodynamic response to riociguat correlated with riociguat exposure in patients with PAH or CTEPH in phase III population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analyses. Riociguat has a low risk of clinically relevant drug interactions due to its clearance by multiple cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes and its lack of effect on major CYP isoforms and transporter proteins at therapeutic levels. Riociguat has been approved for the treatment of PAH and CTEPH that is inoperable or persistent/recurrent after surgical treatment.

Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Bosentan Identifies the Saturable Hepatic Uptake As a Major Contributor to Its Nonlinear Pharmacokinetics

Bosentan is a substrate of hepatic uptake transporter organic anion-transporting polypeptides (OATPs), and undergoes extensive hepatic metabolism by cytochrome P450 (P450), namely, CYP3A4 and CYP2C9. Several clinical investigations have reported a nonlinear relationship between bosentan doses and its systemic exposure, which likely involves the saturation of OATP-mediated uptake, P450-mediated metabolism, or both in the liver. Yet, the underlying causes for the nonlinear bosentan pharmacokinetics are not fully delineated. To address this, we performed physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling analyses for bosentan after its intravenous administration at different doses. As a bottom-up approach, PBPK modeling analyses were performed using in vitro kinetic parameters, other relevant parameters, and scaling factors. As top-down approaches, three different types of PBPK models that incorporate the saturation of hepatic uptake, metabolism, or both were compared. The prediction from the bottom-up approach (models 1 and 2) yielded blood bosentan concentration-time profiles and their systemic clearance values that were not in good agreement with the clinically observed data. From top-down approaches (models 3, 4, 5-1, and 5-2), the prediction accuracy was best only with the incorporation of the saturable hepatic uptake for bosentan. Taken together, the PBPK models for bosentan were successfully established, and the comparison of different PBPK models identified the saturation of the hepatic uptake process as a major contributing factor for the nonlinear pharmacokinetics of bosentan.

Considerations from the IQ Induction Working Group in Response to Drug-Drug Interaction Guidance from Regulatory Agencies: Focus on Downregulation, CYP2C Induction, and CYP2B6 Positive Control

The European Medicines Agency (EMA), the Pharmaceutical and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA), and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) have issued guidelines for the conduct of drug-drug interaction studies. To examine the applicability of these regulatory recommendations specifically for induction, a group of scientists, under the auspices of the Drug Metabolism Leadership Group of the Innovation and Quality (IQ) Consortium, formed the Induction Working Group (IWG). A team of 19 scientists, from 16 of the 39 pharmaceutical companies that are members of the IQ Consortium and two Contract Research Organizations reviewed the recommendations, focusing initially on the current EMA guidelines. Questions were collated from IQ member companies as to which aspects of the guidelines require further evaluation. The EMA was then approached to provide insights into their recommendations on the following: 1) evaluation of downregulation, 2) in vitro assessment of CYP2C induction, 3) the use of CITCO as the positive control for CYP2B6 induction by CAR, 4) data interpretation (a 2-fold increase in mRNA as evidence of induction), and 5) the duration of incubation of hepatocytes with test article. The IWG conducted an anonymous survey among IQ member companies to query current practices, focusing specifically on the aforementioned key points. Responses were received from 19 companies. All data and information were blinded before being shared with the IWG. The results of the survey are presented, together with consensus recommendations on downregulation, CYP2C induction, and CYP2B6 positive control. Results and recommendations related to data interpretation and induction time course will be reported in subsequent articles.

Population pharmacokinetics and the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationship of riociguat in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension or chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension

This analysis aimed to characterize the pharmacokinetics (PK) and PK/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) relationship of riociguat and its metabolite M1 in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) or pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Blood samples were collected in two phase 3 studies-PATENT-1 (Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Soluble Guanylate Cyclase-Stimulator Trial 1; 12 weeks; PAH) and CHEST-1 (Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension Soluble Guanylate Cyclase-Stimulator Trial 1; 16 weeks; CTEPH)-and long-term extensions. Patients were initially randomized to receive placebo or riociguat, and they received riociguat in the extensions. Nonlinear mixed-effects modeling was used to develop a population PK model describing riociguat PK. PK/PD relationships were investigated by comparing derived PK parameters with changes in PD parameters. Covariate analyses included smoking status, bosentan comedication, bilirubin levels, and baseline creatinine clearance. The PK of riociguat/M1 was described by a one-compartment model. Mean population estimates for riociguat absorption rate constant, clearance, and volume of distribution were 2.17/h, 1.81 L/h, and 32.3 L, respectively; for M1 they were 0.258/h, 3.16 L/h, and 124 L. Interindividual variability was moderate for riociguat and moderate to high for M1. There was no evidence of time- or dose-dependent changes in riociguat/M1 PK. Riociguat clearance was higher in smokers (120% increase) and bosentan-treated patients (36% increase) than in nonsmokers and those not receiving bosentan. There was an inverse correlation between bilirubin and riociguat clearance. In PK/PD analyses, 6-minute walk distance was related to hemodynamic parameters, particularly pulmonary vascular resistance. Riociguat PK were described by a one-compartment model. Effects of covariates on riociguat and M1 PK were established, and a PK/PD relationship was demonstrated. (ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: PATENT-1, NCT00810693; PATENT-2, NCT00863681; CHEST-1, NCT00855465; CHEST-2, NCT00910429.).

Clarithromycin substantially increases steady-state bosentan exposure in healthy volunteers

AIMS

The aim of this study was to assess the effect of the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 and organic anion-transporting polypeptide (OATP) 1B1 inhibitor clarithromycin on the pharmacokinetics of bosentan. We also aimed to evaluate the impact of CYP2C9 and SLCO1B1 (encoding for OATP1B1) genotypes and their combination.

METHODS

We assessed the effect of the OATP and CYP3A inhibitor clarithromycin on bosentan pharmacokinetics at steady state and concurrently quantified changes of CYP3A activity using midazolam as a probe drug. Sixteen healthy volunteers received therapeutic doses of bosentan (125 mg twice daily) for 14 days and clarithromycin (500 mg twice daily) concomitantly for the last 4 days, and bosentan pharmacokinetics was assessed on days 1, 10 and 14.

RESULTS

Clarithromycin significantly increased bosentan area under the plasma concentration-time curve of the dosing interval 3.7-fold and peak concentration 3.8-fold in all participants irrespective of the genotype. Clarithromycin also reduced CYP3A activity (midazolam clearance) in all participants; however, these changes were not correlated to the changes of bosentan clearance.

CONCLUSIONS

Clarithromycin substantially increases the exposure to bosentan, suggesting that dose reductions may be necessary.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation of macitentan , a novel endothelin receptor antagonist for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension

INTRODUCTION

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a chronic disorder of the pulmonary vasculature characterized by elevated mean pulmonary arterial pressure eventually leading to right-sided heart failure and premature death. Macitentan is an oral, once-daily, dual endothelin (ET)A and ETB receptor antagonist with high affinity and sustained receptor binding that was approved in the USA, Europe, Canada, and Switzerland for the treatment of PAH.

AREAS COVERED

This review discusses the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of macitentan and its drug interaction potential based on preclinical and clinical data.

EXPERT OPINION

Up to date, macitentan is the only registered treatment for PAH that significantly reduced morbidity and mortality as a combined endpoint in a long-term event-driven study. The safety profile of macitentan is favorable with respect to hepatic safety and edema/fluid retention and may be better than that of other ET receptor antagonists such as bosentan and ambrisentan. The PK profile supports a once-a-day dosing regimen. Macitentan has limited interactions with other drugs. Based on these characteristics macitentan is an important new addition to the treatment of PAH.

Pharmacologic treatments for pulmonary hypertension: exploring pharmacogenomics

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a disease with multiple etiologies and is categorized into five broad groups. Of these groups, pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is the most studied and, therefore, all of the currently available drug classes (prostacyclin analogs, endothelin receptor antagonists and phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors) were developed to treat PAH. Thus, limited treatment data exist for the less-studied non-PAH forms of PH. Pharmacogenomics can be a tool to better understand the pathways involved in PH, as well as to improve personalization of therapy. However, little pharmacogenomic research has been carried out on this disease. New treatments for PH are on the horizon, deriving from both repurposed currently available drugs and novel therapeutics.

Bosentan

Bosentan (Tracleer, Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd) is an oral dual endothelin receptor antagonist approved for use in functional class III to IV pulmonary arterial hypertension. In two placebo-controlled trials, patients receiving bosentan showed improved functional class, 6-minute walk distance and hemodynamics over a 12- to 16-week period. Follow-up data over 3 years has shown few deteriorations,with the majority of patients maintaining their response to bosentan alone. Investigations exploring the use of bosentan as an add-on agent to intravenous epoprostenol (Flolan, GlaxoSmithKline Plc) in those with the most severe disease are ongoing. Bosentan may also have antifibrotic properties and its use in pulmonary fibrosis is being explored. Ease of administration of bosentan with twice-daily oral dosing will provide many patients with pulmonary hypertension an option for treatment without the risks and discomforts of continuous intravenous medication.

Almorexant effects on CYP3A4 activity studied by its simultaneous and time-separated administration with simvastatin and atorvastatin

PURPOSE

To characterise further the previously observed cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) interaction of the dual orexin receptor antagonist almorexant.

METHODS

Pharmacokinetic interactions were investigated (n = 14 healthy male subjects in two treatment groups) between almorexant at steady-state when administered either concomitantly or 2 h after administration of single doses of simvastatin (40 mg) or atorvastatin (40 mg).

RESULTS

Almorexant dose-dependently increased simvastatin exposure (AUC0-∞) when administered concomitantly [geometric mean ratios (90 % CI): 2.5 (2.1, 2.9) (100 mg), 3.9 (3.3, 4.6) (200 mg)], but not Cmax [3.7 (3.0, 4.5) for both doses]. Time-separated administration resulted in relevant reductions of the interaction [AUC0-∞: 1.4 (1.2, 1.7) (100 mg), 1.7 (1.5, 2.0) (200 mg); Cmax: 1.5 (1.3, 1.9) (100 mg), 1.9 (1.6, 2.4) (200 mg)]. Similar results were obtained for hydroxyacid simvastatin. Independent of almorexant dose and relative time of administration, AUC0-∞ and Cmax of atorvastatin increased (ratios ranged from 1.1 to 1.5). AUC0-∞ and Cmax of o-hydroxy atorvastatin decreased dose-independently [AUC0-∞: 0.8 (0.8, 0.9) (100 mg), 0.6 (0.5, 0.6) (200 mg); Cmax: 0.3 (0.3, 0.4) (100 mg), 0.2 (0.2, 0.3) (200 mg)] when atorvastatin was concomitantly administered. Cmax of o-hydroxy atorvastatin slightly decreased (0.8 for both doses) following time-separated administration; AUC0-∞ was unchanged.

CONCLUSIONS

Whereas almorexant increased simvastatin exposure dose- and relative time of administration-dependently, atorvastatin exposure increased to a smaller extent and irrespective of dose and time. This suggests that the observed interaction of almorexant with simvastatin is mainly caused by intestinal CYP3A4 inhibition, whereas the interaction with atorvastatin is more due to hepatic CYP3A4 inhibition.

Pharmacokinetic interactions of almorexant with midazolam and simvastatin, two CYP3A4 model substrates, in healthy male subjects

PURPOSE

Pre-clinical experiments have shown that almorexant, a dual orexin receptor antagonist, is able to inhibit cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4). Therefore, a study was conducted to investigate the effects of multiple-dose almorexant on the pharmacokinetics of midazolam and simvastatin, two CYP3A4 model substrates.

METHODS

Fourteen healthy male subjects were enrolled in an open-label, randomized, two-way crossover study. Treatment period A consisted of a single oral dose of 2 mg midazolam on day 1 and 40 mg simvastatin on day 3. In treatment period B, subjects received 200 mg almorexant once daily for 9 days together with a single oral dose of midazolam on day 7 and simvastatin on day 9.

RESULTS

Concomitant administration of midazolam with almorexant at steady-state levels, achieved within 4-5 days, resulted in an increase of 1.2-fold [90 % confidence interval (CI) 1.0-1.4], 1.4-fold (90 % CI 1.2-1.6), and 1.3-fold (90 % CI 1.2-1.4) in the maximum plasma concentration (C(max)), area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUC(0-∞)), and terminal half-life (t(1/2)), respectively, of midazolam; the time to peak plasma concentration (t(max)) was unchanged. Whereas C(max) and t(max) were not influenced by almorexant, the AUC(0-∞) of hydroxy-midazolam increased by 1.2-fold (90 % CI 1.1-1.4) and the t(1/2) by 1.3-fold (90 % CI 1.0-1.5). Concomitant administration of simvastatin with almorexant at steady-state resulted in an increase of 2.7-fold (90 % CI 2.0-3.7) and 3.4-fold (90 % CI 2.6-4.4) in C(max) and AUC(0-∞), respectively, for simvastatin; the t(1/2) and t(max) were unchanged. The C(max) and AUC(0-∞) of hydroxyacid simvastatin both increased by 2.8-fold, with 90 % CIs of 2.3-3.5 and 2.2-3.5, respectively; the t(max) increased by 2 h and the t(1/2) was unchanged. The urinary 6-β-hydroxycortisol/cortisol ratio was unaffected by almorexant.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that the observed interaction was caused by the inhibition of CYP3A4 activity, most probably at the gut level.

Clinical pharmacokinetics and drug-drug interactions of endothelin receptor antagonists in pulmonary arterial hypertension

The authors review the basic pharmacology and potential for adverse drug-drug interactions (DDIs) of bosentan and ambrisentan, the 2 endothelin receptor antagonists currently approved for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) treatment. Bosentan, an endothelin (ET) receptor-type ET(A) and ET(B) antagonist, is metabolized to active metabolites by and an inducer of cytochrome P450 (CYP)2C9 and CYP3A. Ambrisentan, a selective ET(A) receptor antagonist, is metabolized primarily by uridine 5'diphosphate glucuronosyltransferases (UGTs) 1A9S, 2B7S, and 1A3S and, to a lesser extent, by CYP3A and CYP2C19. Drug interactions observed with bosentan DDI studies have demonstrated a potential for significant clinical implications during PAH management: bosentan is contraindicated with cyclosporine A and glyburide, and additional monitoring/dose adjustments are required when coadministered with hormonal contraceptives, simvastatin, lopinavir/ritonavir, and rifampicin. As bosentan carries a boxed warning regarding risks of liver injury and showed dose-dependant increases in serum aminotransferase abnormalities, drug interactions that increase bosentan exposure are of particular clinical concern. Ambrisentan DDI studies performed to date have shown only one clinically relevant DDI, an interaction with cyclosporine A that requires ambrisentan dose reduction. As the treatment of PAH moves toward multimodal combination therapy, scrutiny should be placed on ensuring that drug combinations achieve maximal clinical benefit while minimizing side effects.

[Specific considerations on the prescription and therapeutic interchange of statins]

OBJECTIVE

The pharmaceutical industry currently offers six different statins in Spain and there is one more soon to be available. Choosing the most appropriate drug and dose is determined by the therapeutic target (reduction in LDL-C levels). Statin doses that decrease LDL-C at the same percentage are considered equivalent. Evaluating the pharmacokinetic characteristics of each statin can be useful when setting selection criteria, helping to determine which statin may be more appropriate for a patient based on their individual characteristics and on the other co-administered drugs.

METHODS

We reviewed the pharmacokinetics properties of each statin and its possible involvement in drug interactions.

RESULTS

CYP3A4 was responsible for the metabolism of lovastatin, simvastatin and atorvastatin; fluvastatin depends on CYP2C9; P-glycoprotein is responsible for decreased atorvastatin, pravastatin, simvastatin and lovastatin concentrations. The OATPA1B1 transporter involved in all statins' access to the hepatocyte, except for fluvastatin, is essential for rosuvastatin and pravastatin. These circumstances cause those drugs inhibiting or inducing isoenzymes or transporters' activity not to have the same effect on the different statins.

CONCLUSION

The pharmacokinetics is important when choosing the best statin and could be a limitation in the use of interchange therapeutic programmes when other drugs are present.

Differential modulation of the expression of important drug metabolising enzymes and transporters by endothelin-1 receptor antagonists ambrisentan and bosentan in vitro

The safety and effectiveness of drugs used to treat chronic diseases critically depend on their propensity to interact with co-administered drugs. Induction of enzymes and drug transporters involved in the clearance and distribution of drugs may critically reduce exposure with their substrates and thus lead to nonresponse. We therefore investigated the impact of the endothelin-1 receptor antagonists bosentan and ambrisentan on the expression of relevant human efflux and uptake transporters and on phase 1 and phase 2 enzymes. LS180 adenocarcinoma cells were treated for four days with bosentan or ambrisentan (1-50 μM), the positive control rifampicin, or medium only (negative control). For evaluation of bosentan also HuH-7 human hepatoma cells were used and treated similarly. Gene expression was quantified at the mRNA level by real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction and for some genes also at the protein level by western blot analysis. Comparable to rifampicin, bosentan was a moderate to strong inductor for all cytochrome P450 isozymes and ATP-binding cassette transporters tested, and it also induced organic anion transporting polypeptides. 50 μM bosentan up-regulated e.g. CYP3A4 8.5-fold, ABCB1 5.1-fold, and ABCB11 1.9-fold at the mRNA level in LS180 cells. In HuH-7 cells induction was much less pronounced (e.g. CYP3A4 1.9-fold for bosentan). In contrast, ambrisentan only weakly induced some of the genes investigated in LS180 cells. These findings corroborate the in vivo finding that bosentan is much more prone to drug interactions than ambrisentan.

An atypical presentation of liver enzyme elevation resulting from bosentan use

Hepatocellular enzyme elevation is a known side effect of both bosentan and atorvastatin. However, a rise in liver enzyme level not characteristic of either agent individually may represent a reaction to their combination or an atypical reaction to bosentan alone. The present case report describes a patient who had been taking atorvastatin for many years and was started on bosentan for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. After 19 weeks of therapy, she developed severe liver enzyme elevation that necessitated the discontinuation of both bosentan and atorvastatin. Although the safety of reintroducing bosentan in such a case is unknown, it was reintroduced in this patient because of the severity of her disease, the demonstrated treatment benefit and the lack of alternative treatment options. On reintroduction of bosentan alone, she again demonstrated significant liver enzyme elevation - this time occurring after only two doses. The present case highlights that bosentan can cause more rapid and severe hepatocellular enzyme elevation than previously believed, thus necessitating more frequent monitoring.

Simvastatin as a treatment for pulmonary hypertension trial

RATIONALE

In animal models of pulmonary hypertension, simvastatin has been shown to reduce pulmonary artery pressure and induce regression of associated right ventricular (RV) hypertrophy.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the therapeutic value of simvastatin in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH).

METHODS

Forty-two patients with PAH were randomized to receive either simvastatin (80 mg/d) or placebo in addition to current care for 6 months, and thereafter offered open-label simvastatin. The primary outcome was change in RV mass, assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR).

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

At 6 months, RV mass decreased by 5.2 +/- 11 g in the statin group (P = 0.045) and increased 3.9 +/- 14 g in the placebo group. The treatment effect was -9.1 g (P = 0.028). N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels decreased significantly in the statin group (-75 +/- 167 fmol/ml; P = 0.02) but not the placebo group (49 +/- 224 fmol/ml; P = 0.43; overall treatment effect -124 fmol/ml; P = 0.041). There were no significant changes in other outcome measures (including 6-minute walk test, cardiac index, and circulating cytokines). From 6 to 12 months, both RV mass and NT-proBNP increased toward baseline values in 16 patients on active treatment who continued with simvastatin but remained stable in 18 patients who switched from placebo to simvastatin. Two patients required a reduction in dose but not cessation of simvastatin.

CONCLUSIONS

Simvastatin added to conventional therapy produces a small and transient early reduction in RV mass and NT-proBNP levels in patients with PAH, but this is not sustained over 12 months.

Bosentan: a review of its use in the management of mildly symptomatic pulmonary arterial hypertension

Bosentan (Tracleer) is an orally administered dual endothelin-1 (ET-1) receptor antagonist approved for use in patients with WHO class II (mildly symptomatic) pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Oral bosentan therapy was beneficial and generally well tolerated in patients with mildly symptomatic PAH. In a well designed, placebo-controlled trial in adolescents and adults with mildly symptomatic PAH, pulmonary vascular resistance was significantly reduced with bosentan relative to placebo, but the 6-minute walk distance did not increase significantly. Similarly, pediatric patients (most of whom had mildly symptomatic PAH) in a small uncontrolled trial experienced some improvement in hemodynamic variables with bosentan, but did not experience a significant increase in exercise capacity. Adverse events associated with bosentan were consistent with those seen in other indications, with major concerns being the potential for teratogenicity and hepatotoxicity, for which regular liver function monitoring is recommended. Overall, considering the progressive nature of PAH, bosentan extends the treatment options available to patients with mildly symptomatic PAH.

Bosentan: a review of its use in the management of digital ulcers associated with systemic sclerosis

Bosentan (Tracleer) is an orally administered dual endothelin-1 (ET-1) receptor antagonist approved in the EU for reducing the number of new digital ulcers in patients with systemic sclerosis and ongoing digital ulcer disease. Oral bosentan therapy was beneficial and generally well tolerated in patients with digital ulcers associated with systemic sclerosis. In well designed, placebo-controlled trials, bosentan treatment significantly reduced the number of new ulcers, but had no effect on ulcer healing, in patients with digital ulcers. Adverse events associated with bosentan were consistent with those seen during treatment for other indications, with major concerns being the potential for teratogenicity and hepatotoxicity, for which regular liver function monitoring is recommended. Overall, considering the large unmet need for therapeutic options in patients with digital ulcers, bosentan extends the treatment options available to patients with systemic sclerosis-associated digital ulcers.

Successful strategy to improve the specificity of electronic statin-drug interaction alerts

PURPOSE

A considerable weakness of current clinical decision support systems managing drug-drug interactions (DDI) is the high incidence of inappropriate alerts. Because DDI-induced, dose-dependent adverse events can be prevented by dosage adjustment, corresponding DDI alerts should only be issued if dosages exceed safe limits. We have designed a logical framework for a DDI alert-system that considers prescribed dosage and retrospectively evaluates the impact on the frequency of statin-drug interaction alerts.

METHODS

Upper statin dose limits were extracted from the drug label (SPC) (20 statin-drug combinations) or clinical trials specifying the extent of the pharmacokinetic interaction (43 statin-drug combinations). We retrospectively assessed electronic DDI alerts and compared the number of standard alerts to alerts that took dosage into account.

RESULTS

From among 2457 electronic prescriptions, we identified 73 high-risk statin-drug pairs. Of these, SPC dosage information classified 19 warnings as inappropriate. Data from pharmacokinetic trials took quantitative dosage information more often into consideration and classified 40 warnings as inappropriate. This is a significant reduction in the number of alerts by 55% compared to SPC-based information (26%; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This retrospective study of pharmacokinetic statin interactions demonstrates that more than half of the DDI alerts that presented in a clinical decision support system were inappropriate if DDI-specific upper dose limits are not considered.

General framework for the prediction of oral drug interactions caused by CYP3A4 induction from in vivo information

BACKGROUND

Induction of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 potentially reduces the blood concentrations of substrate drugs to less than one-tenth, which results in ineffective pharmacotherapy. Although the prediction of drug-drug interactions (DDIs) that are mediated by induction of CYP3A4 has been performed mainly on the basis of in vitro information, such methods have met with limited success in terms of their accuracy and applicability. Therefore, a realistic method for the prediction of CYP3A4-mediated inductive DDIs is of major clinical importance.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the present study was to construct a robust and accurate method for the prediction of CYP3A4-mediated inductive DDIs. Such a method was developed on the basis of the principle applied for prediction of inhibitory DDIs in a previous report. A unique character of this principle is that the extent of alterations in the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) is predicted on the basis of in vivo information from minimal clinical studies without using in vitro data.

METHODS

The analysis is based on 42 DDI studies in humans reported in 37 published articles over the period 1983-2007. Kinetic analysis revealed that the reduction in the AUC of a substrate of CYP3A4 produced by consecutive administration of an inducer of CYP3A4 could be approximated by the equation 1/(1 + CRCYP3A4 * ICCYP3A4), where CRCYP3A4 is the ratio of the apparent contribution of CYP3A4 to the oral clearance of a substrate and ICCYP3A4 is the apparent increase in clearance of a substrate produced by induction of CYP3A4. Using this equation, the ICCYP3A4 was calculated for seven inducers (bosentan, carbamazepine, efavirenz, phenytoin, pioglitazone, rifampicin [rifampin], and St John's wort [hypericum]) on the basis of the reduction in the AUC of a coadministered standard substrate of CYP3A4, such as simvastatin, in ten DDI studies. The CRCYP3A4 was calculated for 22 substrates on the basis of the previously reported method from inhibitory DDI studies using a potent CYP3A4 inhibitor such as itraconazole or ketoconazole.

RESULTS

The proposed method enabled the prediction of AUC reduction by CYP3A4 induction with any combination of these substrates and inducers (total 154 matches). To assess the accuracy of the prediction, the AUC reductions in 32 studies were analysed. We found that the magnitude of the deviation between the mean values of the observed and predicted AUCs of all substrate drugs was <20% of the AUCs of the respective substrate drugs before administration of the inducers. In addition, rifampicin was found to be the most potent inducer among the compounds analysed in the present study, with an ICCYP3A4 value of 7.7, followed by phenytoin and carbamazepine, with values of 4.7 and 3.0, respectively. The ICCYP3A4 values of the other CYP3A4 inducers analysed in the present study were approximately 1 or less, which suggests that the AUCs of coadministered drugs may not be reduced to less than approximately half, even if the drug is metabolized solely by CYP3A4.

CONCLUSION

By using the method reported in the present study, the susceptibilities of a substrate drug of CYP3A4 to inductive DDIs can be predicted quantitatively. It was indicated that coadministration of rifampicin, phenytoin and carbamazepine may reduce plasma AUCs to less than half for a broad range of CYP3A4 substrate drugs, with CRCYP3A4 values greater than 0.13, 0.21 and 0.33, respectively.

Modeling, prediction, and in vitro in vivo correlation of CYP3A4 induction

CYP3A4 induction is not generally considered to be a concern for safety; however, serious therapeutic failures can occur with drugs whose exposure is lower as a result of more rapid metabolic clearance due to induction. Despite the potential therapeutic consequences of induction, little progress has been made in quantitative predictions of CYP3A4 induction-mediated drug-drug interactions (DDIs) from in vitro data. In the present study, predictive models have been developed to facilitate extrapolation of CYP3A4 induction measured in vitro to human clinical DDIs. The following parameters were incorporated into the DDI predictions: 1) EC(50) and E(max) of CYP3A4 induction in primary hepatocytes; 2) fractions unbound of the inducers in human plasma (f(u, p)) and hepatocytes (f(u, hept)); 3) relevant clinical in vivo concentrations of the inducers ([Ind](max, ss)); and 4) fractions of the victim drugs cleared by CYP3A4 (f(m, CYP3A4)). The values for [Ind](max, ss) and f(m, CYP3A4) were obtained from clinical reports of CYP3A4 induction and inhibition, respectively. Exposure differences of the affected drugs in the presence and absence of the six individual inducers (bosentan, carbamazepine, dexamethasone, efavirenz, phenobarbital, and rifampicin) were predicted from the in vitro data and then correlated with those reported clinically (n = 103). The best correlation was observed (R(2) = 0.624 and 0.578 from two hepatocyte donors) when f(u, p) and f(u, hept) were included in the predictions. Factors that could cause over- or underpredictions (potential outliers) of the DDIs were also analyzed. Collectively, these predictive models could add value to the assessment of risks associated with CYP3A4 induction-based DDIs by enabling their determination in the early stages of drug development.

Inhibitory and Inductive Effects of Rifampin on the Pharmacokinetics of Bosentan in Healthy Subjects

This study was conducted to investigate the effect of rifampin on the pharmacokinetics of bosentan. Healthy male subjects received bosentan 125 mg b.i.d. for 6.5 days in the presence or absence of rifampin 600 mg once a day. In vitro experiments were performed to investigate the effect of rifampin on the uptake of bosentan into Chinese hamster ovary cells expressing the human organic anion-transporting polypeptide (OATP)1B1, -1B3, and -2B1. Following the first concomitant administration, there was a fivefold increase in bosentan trough concentrations. At steady state, concomitant rifampin significantly decreased exposure to bosentan by 58%. Rifampin potently inhibited the uptake of bosentan into cells expressing human OATP1B1 and -1B3. Rifampin decreased the exposure to bosentan consistent with its known cytochrome P450 enzyme-inductive properties. The initial increase in bosentan concentrations can be explained by an inhibitory effect of rifampin on hepatic drug transporters.

Pharmacotherapy for idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension during the past 25 years

OBJECTIVE

To review the current pharmacotherapy for idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (IPAH).

METHODS

A search of the primary literature was conducted by using MEDLINE, the National Institutes of Health medical research Web site (www.clinicaltrials.gov), and the United States Food and Drug Administration's Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Web site (www.fda.gov/cder).

RESULTS

Until the early 1980s, conventional therapy for IPAH consisted of anticoagulation, diuretics, digitalis extracts, and supplemental oxygen, yet the 5-year mortality rate remained at 66%. Calcium channel blocker therapy was introduced with the hope that it would improve survival in patients with IPAH, but it was found to be effective in only approximately 25% of patients. In 1996, intravenous epoprostenol was the first drug to show long-term benefit on hemodynamics, exercise capacity, and survival. However, administration of epoprostenol requires a permanently indwelling central venous catheter, and tachyphylaxis is common, necessitating continuous dosage escalations. Subsequently, treprostinil, a prostacyclin analog of epoprostenol that can be administered by continuous subcutaneous infusion, was introduced, followed by aerosolized iloprost, a prostacyclin analog for inhalation. An increasing understanding of the multiple pathogeneses of IPAH led to the discovery of another target for drug therapy, and bosentan, an orally administered agent, became the first endothelin-receptor antagonist approved for treatment of IPAH. Most recently, the phosphodiesterase inhibitor, sildenafil, has received approval from the United States Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of IPAH.

CONCLUSION

Recently developed pharmacotherapies offer greater effectiveness and safety than traditional agents for the treatment of IPAH.

Endothelin receptor antagonists

Endothelin receptor antagonists (ERAs) have been developed to block the effects of endothelin-1 (ET-1) in a variety of cardiovascular conditions. ET-1 is a powerful vasoconstrictor with mitogenic or co-mitogenic properties, which acts through the stimulation of 2 subtypes of receptors [endothelin receptor subtype A (ETA) and endothelin receptor subtype B (ETB) receptors]. Endogenous ET-1 is involved in a variety of conditions including systemic and pulmonary hypertension (PH), congestive heart failure (CHF), vascular remodeling (restenosis, atherosclerosis), renal failure, cancer, and cerebrovascular disease. The first dual ETA/ETB receptor blocker, bosentan, has already been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Trials of endothelin receptor antagonists in heart failure have been completed with mixed results so far. Studies are ongoing on the effects of selective ETA antagonists or dual ETA/ETB antagonists in lung fibrosis, cancer, and subarachnoid hemorrhage. While non-peptidic ET-1 receptor antagonists suitable for oral intake with excellent bioavailability have become available, proven efficacy is limited to pulmonary hypertension, but it is possible that these agents might find a place in the treatment of several cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular diseases in the coming future.

Clinical pharmacology of bosentan, a dual endothelin receptor antagonist

Bosentan, a dual endothelin receptor antagonist, is indicated for the treatment of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Following oral administration, bosentan attains peak plasma concentrations after approximately 3 hours. The absolute bioavailability is about 50%. Food does not exert a clinically relevant effect on absorption at the recommended dose of 125 mg. Bosentan is approximately 98% bound to albumin and, during multiple-dose administration, has a volume of distribution of 30 L and a clearance of 17 L/h. The terminal half-life after oral administration is 5.4 hours and is unchanged at steady state. Steady-state concentrations are achieved within 3-5 days after multiple-dose administration, when plasma concentrations are decreased by about 50% because of a 2-fold increase in clearance, probably due to induction of metabolising enzymes. Bosentan is mainly eliminated from the body by hepatic metabolism and subsequent biliary excretion of the metabolites. Three metabolites have been identified, formed by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C9 and 3A4. The metabolite Ro 48-5033 may contribute 20% to the total response following administration of bosentan. The pharmacokinetics of bosentan are dose-proportional up to 600 mg (single dose) and 500 mg/day (multiple doses). The pharmacokinetics of bosentan in paediatric PAH patients are comparable to those in healthy subjects, whereas adult PAH patients show a 2-fold increased exposure. Severe renal impairment (creatinine clearance 15-30 mL/min) and mild hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh class A) do not have a clinically relevant influence on the pharmacokinetics of bosentan. No dosage adjustment in adults is required based on sex, age, ethnic origin and bodyweight. Bosentan should generally be avoided in patients with moderate or severe hepatic impairment and/or elevated liver aminotransferases. Ketoconazole approximately doubles the exposure to bosentan because of inhibition of CYP3A4. Bosentan decreases exposure to ciclosporin, glibenclamide, simvastatin (and beta-hydroxyacid simvastatin) and (R)- and (S)-warfarin by up to 50% because of induction of CYP3A4 and/or CYP2C9. Coadministration of ciclosporin and bosentan markedly increases initial bosentan trough concentrations. Concomitant treatment with glibenclamide and bosentan leads to an increase in the incidence of aminotransferase elevations. Therefore, combined use with ciclosporin and glibenclamide is contraindicated and not recommended, respectively. The possibility of reduced efficacy of CYP2C9 and 3A4 substrates should be considered when coadministered with bosentan. No clinically relevant interaction was detected with the P-glycoprotein substrate digoxin. In healthy subjects, bosentan doses >300 mg increase plasma levels of endothelin-1. The drug moderately reduces blood pressure, and its main adverse effects are headache, flushing, increased liver aminotransferases, leg oedema and anaemia. In a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic study in PAH patients, the haemodynamic effects lagged the plasma concentrations of bosentan.