Population Pharmacokinetics of Delavirdine and N-Delavirdine in HIV-Infected Individuals

Gender-based personalized pharmacotherapy: a systematic review

PURPOSE

In general, male and female are prescribed the same amount of dosage even if most of the cases female required less dosage than male. Physicians are often facing problem on appropriate drug dosing, efficient treatment, and drug safety for a female in general. To identify and synthesize evidence about the effectiveness of gender-based therapy; provide the information to patients, providers, and health system intervention to ensure safety treatment; and minimize adverse effects.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review to evaluate the effect of gender difference on pharmacotherapy. Published articles from January 1990 to December 2015 were identified using specific term in MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, and the Cochrane library according to search strategies that strengthen the reporting of observational and clinical studies.

RESULTS

Twenty-six studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria for this systematic review, yielding a total of 6309 subjects. We observed that female generally has a lower the gastric emptying time, gastric PH, lean body mass, and higher plasma volume, BMI, body fat, as well as reduce hepatic clearance, difference in activity of Cytochrome P450 enzyme, and metabolize drugs at different rate compared with male. Other significant factors such as conjugation, protein binding, absorption, and the renal elimination could not be ignored. However, these differences can lead to adverse effects in female especially for the pregnant, post-menopausal, and elderly women.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review provides an evidence for the effectiveness of dosage difference to ensure safety and efficient treatment. Future studies on the current topic are, therefore, recommended to reduce the adverse effect of therapy.

Caring for women living with HIV: gaps in the evidence

Introduction

In the management of HIV, women and men generally undergo the same treatment pathway, with gender differences being given limited consideration. This is in spite of accumulating evidence that there are a number of potential differences between women and men which may affect response to treatment, pharmacokinetics, toxicities and coping. There are also notable psychological, behavioural, social and structural factors that may have a unique impact on women living with HIV (WLWH). Despite our increasing knowledge of HIV and advances in treatment, there are significant gaps in the data relating specifically to women. One of the factors contributing to this situation is the under-representation of women in all aspects of HIV clinical research. Furthermore, there are clinical issues unique to women, including gynaecologic and breast diseases, menopause-related factors, contraception and other topics related to women's and sexual health.

Methods

Using scoping review methodology, articles from the literature from 1980 to 2012 were identified using appropriate MeSH headings reflecting the clinical status of WLWH, particularly in the areas of clinical management, sexual health, emotional wellbeing and treatment access. Titles and abstracts were scanned to determine whether they were relevant to non-reproductive health in WLWH, and papers meeting inclusion criteria were reviewed.

Results

This review summarizes our current knowledge of the clinical status of WLWH, particularly in the areas of clinical management, sexual health, emotional wellbeing and treatment access. It suggests that there are a number of gender differences in disease and treatment outcomes, and distinct women-specific issues, such as menopause and co-morbidities, that pose significant challenges to the care of WLWH.

Conclusions

Based on a review of this evidence, outstanding questions and areas where further studies are required to determine gender differences in the efficacy and safety of treatment and other clinical and psychological issues specifically affecting WLWH have been identified. Well-controlled and adequately powered clinical studies are essential to help provide answers to these questions and to contribute to activities aimed at improving the health and wellbeing of WLWH.

Non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors: a review on pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety and tolerability

INTRODUCTION

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type-1 non-nucleoside and nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) are key drugs of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) in the clinical management of acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS)/HIV infection.

DISCUSSION

First-generation NNRTIs, nevirapine (NVP), delavirdine (DLV) and efavirenz (EFV) are drugs with a low genetic barrier and poor resistance profile, which has led to the development of new generations of NNRTIs. Second-generation NNRTIs, etravirine (ETR) and rilpivirine (RPV) have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration and European Union, and the next generation of drugs is currently being clinically developed. This review describes recent clinical data, pharmacokinetics, metabolism, pharmacodynamics, safety and tolerability of commercialized NNRTIs, including the effects of sex, race and age differences on pharmacokinetics and safety. Moreover, it summarizes the characteristics of next-generation NNRTIs: lersivirine, GSK 2248761, RDEA806, BILR 355 BS, calanolide A, MK-4965, MK-1439 and MK-6186.

CONCLUSIONS

This review presents a wide description of NNRTIs, providing useful information for researchers interested in this field, both in clinical use and in research.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of antiretroviral drugs in older persons

INTRODUCTION

Combination antiretroviral therapy has enabled HIV-infected persons to reach older ages in high numbers. Hepatic and renal changes that normally occur with advancing age occur earlier and with higher incidence in HIV-infected individuals. A limited number of prospective controlled studies have demonstrated small reductions (17 to 41%) in lopinavir, atazanavir and lamivudine clearance in older versus younger adults. A much larger number of retrospective studies in adults (age range ∼ 20 to 60 years), including all antiretroviral drugs, have evaluated age as a covariate for pharmacokinetics. Most studies did not detect substantial associations between drug exposures and age.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes antiretroviral drug pharmacokinetics in older persons. The authors review articles from PubMed (search terms: elderly, antiretroviral, pharmacokinetics) in addition to the bibliographies of those selected.

EXPERT OPINION

The evidence to date does not support major pharmacokinetic changes in adults between ∼ 20 and 60 years of age. However, additional prospective, well-controlled studies are needed in more persons > 60 years, including those with frailty and comorbidities, with assessment of unbound drug clearance, and incorporation of adherence, pharmacogenetics and concomitant medications. Until then, guidelines for drug-drug interactions and dosing in renal and hepatic impairment should be followed in older HIV-infected individuals.

Pharmacokinetics of BILR 355 after multiple oral doses coadministered with a low dose of ritonavir

The pharmacokinetics and safety of BILR 355 following oral repeated dosing coadministered with low doses of ritonavir (RTV) were investigated in 12 cohorts of healthy male volunteers with a ratio of 6 to 2 for BILR 355 versus the placebo. BILR 355 was given once a day (QD) coadministered with 100 mg RTV (BILR 355/r) at 5 to 50 mg in a polyethylene glycol solution or at 50 to 250 mg as tablets. BILR 355 tablets were also dosed at 150 mg twice a day (BID) coadministered with 100 mg RTV QD or BID. Following oral dosing, BILR 355 was rapidly absorbed, with the mean time to maximum concentration of drug in serum reached within 1.3 to 5 h and a mean half-life of 16 to 20 h. BILR 355 exhibited an approximately linear pharmacokinetics for doses of 5 to 50 mg when given as a solution; in contrast, when given as tablets, BILR 355 displayed a dose-proportional pharmacokinetics, with a dose range of 50 to 100 mg; from 100 to 150 mg, a slightly downward nonlinear pharmacokinetics occurred. The exposure to BILR 355 was maximized at 150 mg and higher due to a saturated dissolution/absorption process. After oral dosing of BILR 355/r, 150/100 mg BID, the values for the maximum concentration of drug in plasma at steady state, the area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to the dose interval at steady state, and the minimum concentration of drug in serum at steady state were 1,500 ng/ml, 12,500 h.ng/ml, and 570 ng/ml, respectively, providing sufficient suppressive concentration toward human immunodeficiency virus type 1. Based on pharmacokinetic modeling along with the in vitro virologic data, several BILR 355 doses were selected for phase II trials using Monte Carlo simulations. Throughout the study, BILR 355 was safe and well tolerated.

Antiretroviral pharmacokinetic profile: a review of sex differences

BACKGROUND

Emerging evidence suggests that female sex may be associated with increased risk of developing antiretroviral toxicities. Although the mechanisms of sex-related antiretroviral pharmacodynamic differences remain poorly understood and may be multifactorial, they appear to be mediated through a common pathway of pharmacokinetic variability between the sexes.

OBJECTIVE

This article reviews sex differences in the pharmacokinetics of the major classes of antiretroviral drugs currently approved for HIV treatment by the US Food and Drug Administration, identifies knowledge gaps, and provides recommendations for future research directions.

METHODS

To identify pertinent articles for this review, the MEDLINE database was searched from 1990 to June 2006 using the terms sex, gender, antiretroviral therapy, ART, HAART, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, NRTI, NNRTI, and protease inhibitors. Search results were restricted to English language and human studies. The reference lists of identified articles were also used, as well as abstracts from relevant conferences. In addition, individual antiretroviral drugs were searched by sex/gender or by pharmacokinetics.

RESULTS

Current evidence, though limited, does suggest the existence of a sex disparity in antiretroviral pharmacokinetics, and such disparity has been shown to have pharmacodynamic implications for some drugs. Sex-mediated intracellular pharmaco-enhancement was associated with superior antiviral activities for the zidovudine and lamivudine members of the nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor class. There appears to be divergent opinions about whether sex is a significant determinant of either nevirapine or efavirenz plasma concentrations. For certain protease inhibitors (PIs) (eg, saquinavir [SQV] and indinavir [IDV]), clinically significant relationships between sex differences in plasma drug concentrations and clinical outcomes have been observed. There appears to be a trend toward higher drug exposure in women than in men when PIs are boosted with ritonavir (RTV). Nelfinavir, the only PI that is currently administered unboosted with RTV, does not exhibit a sex difference in its plasma concentrations. Unboosted amprenavir exposure was lower in women compared with men. Sex differences in the pharmacokinetics of SQV and IDV were observed only in the setting of RTV boosting.

CONCLUSIONS

A common weakness in many studies addressing sex-based differences in the pharmacokinetics of antiretroviral drugs is the relatively small number of women participating. Many of these studies were retrospective in design, and some had limited pharmacokinetic parameters for comparison. Antiretroviral treatment trials should be designed with sufficient power (adequate female participation) to detect sex-based differences both in pharmacokinetics and in clinical response. Future studies should explore the molecular basis for sex-based differences in plasma drug concentrations and antiretroviral drug response. The roles of drug transporter proteins and cellular kinases, and the activities of metabolizing enzymes in mediating differential plasma and intracellular antiretroviral concentrations, should be further assessed.

Inhibition of atazanavir oral absorption by lansoprazole gastric acid suppression in healthy volunteers

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To determine whether the pharmacokinetics of atazanavir, a protease inhibitor used to treat human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, are altered by its coadministration with lansoprazole, a proton pump inhibitor.

DESIGN

Single-dose, open-label, complete-crossover study.

SETTING

Clinical research center.

SUBJECTS

Ten healthy adult volunteers.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

In phase A, subjects received a single oral dose of atazanavir 400 mg alone. In phase B, the same subjects received oral lansoprazole 60 mg, and after 24 hours they were given a second dose of oral lansoprazole 60 mg with atazanavir 400 mg. Eleven blood samples were collected from each subject over a 24-hour period for determination of atazanavir plasma concentrations by a validated high-performance liquid chromatography assay. Pharmacokinetic analysis was performed by standard noncompartmental methods. Nine subjects completed the study, and no significant adverse events were reported. Absorption of atazanavir was significantly reduced when it was coadministered with lansoprazole, as evidenced by a 94% decline in mean area under the concentration-time curve during the 24 hours after administration (AUC(0-24)) (p<0.01). The mean +/- SD AUC(0-24) for phase A was 16.3 +/- 9.0 microM x hour versus 0.95 +/- 1.8 microM x hour for phase B (p<0.01). The mean +/- SD maximum concentration of atazanavir was 3.2 +/- 1.7 microM for phase A and 0.13 +/- 0.19 microM for phase B (p<0.01).

CONCLUSION

Acid suppression markedly reduced the bioavailability of atazanavir in this group of healthy volunteers. Based on these results, atazanavir should not be coadministered with lansoprazole or other proton pump inhibitors.

Pharmacokinetic drug interactions with non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors

Non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) are a diverse group of compounds that inhibit HIV Type 1 reverse transcriptase. Although possessing a common mechanism of action, the approved NNRTIs, delavirdine, efavirenz and nevirapine, differ in structural and pharmacokinetic characteristics. Each of the NNRTIs undergoes biotransformation by the cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme system, thus making them prone to clinically significant drug interactions when combined with other antiretrovirals. In addition, they interact with other concurrent medications and complementary/alternative medicines, acting as either inducers or inhibitors of drug-metabolising CYP enzymes. These drug interactions become an important consideration in the clinical use of these agents when designing combination regimens, as recommended by current guidelines. This review provides an updated summary of pharmacokinetic interactions with NNRTIs.