Possible Interethnic Differences in Omeprazole Pharmacokinetics

Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence evaluation of omeprazole and sodium bicarbonate dry suspensions in healthy Chinese volunteers

Omeprazole and sodium bicarbonate dry suspension are effective treatments for acid-related disorders. This study compared the bioequivalence and safety of the two formulations of omeprazole and sodium bicarbonate powder and assessed how CYP2C19 gene polymorphisms affect pharmacokinetics (PK). A single-center, randomized, single-dose, 2-sequence and 2-period crossover method was performed in forty healthy Chinese subjects. Blood samples were collected after a single dose for PK (AUC0-∞, AUC0-t, and Cmax) analysis. The concentrations of Omeprazole in human plasma were determined by HPLC-MS/MS. Besides, the gene polymorphisms of CYP2C19 were assessed by Sanger sequencing. The geometric mean ratios (90% confidence interval) [GMR (95% CI)] of Test/Reference preparation for Cmax: 95.2% (88.48%, 102.43%), AUC0-t: 97.47% (94.4%, 101.02%), AUC0-∞: 97.68% (94.27%, 101.21%) were within the range of 80.00-125.00%. The non-parametric test showed no statistical difference in Tmax between the two groups (p > 0.05). All drugs were well tolerated, no severe adverse reactions occurred, and no significant differences in adverse events between the two drugs. For CYP2C19 gene polymorphisms, the results showed that of 40 subjects, 12 subjects were extensive metabolizers, 24 were intermediate metabolizers, and 4 were poor metabolizers, the frequency of metabolic genotypes were 30%, 60%, and 10%. And the allele distributions for CYP2C19 were *1, *2, and *3 at 60%, 38.75%, and 1.25%. Both the CYP2C19 alleles and metabolic genotypes were consistent with other studies in Chinese. The results of PK parameters showed that different genotypes of CYP2C19 lead to significant differences in t1/2, AUC0-t, AUC0-∞ and Cmax, but no significant differences in Tmax in each group. At the same time, we confirmed that the PK parameters of the test and reference had no differences between the males and females. This study has shown that the pharmacokinetic parameters of the two formulations are not significantly different, which showed bioequivalence and exemplary safety. CYP2C19 gene polymorphism significantly differed in the PK parameters of omeprazole sodium bicarbonate powder.

Pharmacokinetic profile of sildenafil citrate in healthy Middle Eastern Males: Comparison with other ethnicities

AIM

1) To investigate the pharmacokinetic profile of sildenafil citrate in Middle Eastern males and, 2) To highlight the impact of ethnicity on its pharmacokinetics parameters through comparing Middle Eastern data to the data estimated from different ethnic groups.

METHOD

The study was conducted on 24 Middle Eastern healthy male volunteers. Pharmacokinetic data including Cmax, Tmax, t1/2, AUC0-t, AUC0-∞ were estimated from blood samples collected at several time points within 24 h post-administration of a single 100-mg tablet of sildenafil citrate (Viagra®). Pharmacokinetic data of sildenafil generic 100-mg tablet (product B) was determined in the volunteers using the same analytical method. Pharmacokinetic data of other studies published on different ethnicities were obtained and compared to our Viagra®-related data.

RESULTS

Analysis of Middle Eastern data (mean ± SD) revealed Cmax = 398.9 ± 107.7 ng/ml; Tmax = 1.84 ± 0.22 h; t1/2 = 2.66 ± 0.97 h; AUC0-24 = 1475 ± 515.3 ng.h/ml; AUC0-∞ = 1556 ± 567.58 ng.h/ml. There was no significant difference between Viagra® and product B, confirming the bioequivalence of the two preparation as well as the reliability of utilized analytical method. Data comparisons between Middle Eastern and other ethnicities indicated that Iranian, Mexican, and Thai would potentially have twice the effect observed in Arabs and Caucasians, considering the same prescribed drug formulation and dose.

CONCLUSION

There is a considerable difference in the pharmacokinetic profile of sildenafil citrate between Middle Eastern and other ethnic groups. Ethnicity may predispose individuals to unwanted prolonged activity of sildenafil and adverse events. Thus, it should be taken in consideration by clinicians when recommending sildenafil dose.

The changing histological pattern of gastric polyps in an ethnically heterogeneous population

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Variation in the prevalence of various types of gastric polyps worldwide may reflect different etiologies. Here, the authors report the dynamic changes in histological distribution of gastric polyps over time and by ethnicity for individuals who underwent gastroscopies between 1994 and 2009 at two hospitals in Jerusalem, Israel. During this time period, the proportion of patients receiving proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) increased while the proportion of patients infected with Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) decreased.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Pathological reports of biopsies from 50,071 consecutive gastroscopies were reviewed.

RESULTS

Gastric polyps were detected in 727 individuals. The yearly prevalence of gastric polyps was ≤ 1% between 1994 and 2001 and ≥ 2% from 2004 to 2009, of which overall 66% were hyperplastic polyps and 23% fundic gland polyps (FGPs). FGPs were diagnosed exclusively in the Jewish population. From 2001 to 2004, an increase in the absolute number of newly discovered hyperplastic and FGPs per year was observed. However from 2005, a divergent trend of changes was observed: While the proportion of patients with hyperplastic polyps dropped from 0.72 during the 2001-2004 period to 0.62 during the 2005-2009 period (p = 0.02), the proportion of patients with FGPs at these time periods increased from 0.16 to 0.33 (p = 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The yearly prevalence of gastric polyps in Jerusalem has recently doubled. This occurred mainly due to the increasing prevalence of FGPs. The changing epidemiology of gastric polyps is probably related to the interaction between genetic factors and fluctuating environmental factors like H. pylori infection rates and exposure to PPIs.

Variation in omeprazole pharmacokinetics in a random Iranian population: a pilot study

Omeprazole is metabolized in the liver mainly by the polymorphic CYP2C19 enzyme. Considerable ethnic differences have been reported in the pharmacokinetics of omeprazole. The present study was conducted to evaluate the pharmacokinetic parameters of omeprazole after a single oral administration to a random Iranian population. Thirty healthy male subjects, aged 24-31 years, weighing 60-98 kg completed the study. Plasma concentrations of omeprazole were measured over a 12 h period after administration of a single oral dose of 20 mg omeprazole. The pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated from the plasma concentration-time profiles. Liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) was used to quantify 5-hydroxyomeprazole. The mean area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) from time zero to infinity (AUC(∞) ) values of omeprazole and the corresponding coefficient of variation (CV%) was 987.3 ng h/ml (65%). In general, most subjects showed a normal distribution. Only one subject showed a very high AUC compared with the corresponding mean AUC level. This subject had the highest half-life and the lowest rate of elimination. The omeprazole metabolic ratio for this subject was 2.9, while for the others it was in the range 0.12-0.56. These results are consistent with previous literature that showed the existence of interindividual variability in omeprazole pharmacokinetics, even within a single ethnic group. Differences in the pharmacokinetics could be due to differences in the genetic make-up of subjects as found in their omeprazole metabolic ratios.