Inhaled fluticasone propionate. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use in asthma

Quantitative comparison of different inhaled corticosteroids in the treatment of asthma in children

BACKGROUND

The GINA recommends inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) for the treatment of steps 2-3 of childhood asthma. However, the difference in efficacy between these drugs remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of different ICS drugs in the treatment of childhood asthma.

METHODS

We searched PubMed and EMBASE for randomized controlled trials of ICSs in the treatment of childhood asthma. Using forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV₁) as the primary outcome, a time-course model of ICSs was constructed. In addition, the symptom-free days% were analyzed as a secondary outcome.

RESULTS

Six studies involving 2237 children that reported FEV₁ were included. The results showed that the ET50 of ciclesonide (CIC) and budesonide (BUD) was 1.23 and 2.97 weeks, respectively. Compared with them, FP had a higher efficacy. In terms of symptom-free days%, we found that the efficacy of beclometasone dipropionate was lower than that of CIC and fluticasone propionate.

CONCLUSION

In this study, the efficacy of three ICS drugs was quantitatively compared, providing necessary information for the implementation of medication guidelines for steps 2-3 of asthma in children.

IMPACT

This study analyzed the entire time-course of the drug efficacy of Inhaled corticosteroids in the treatment of asthma in children aged 5-12, which found that although the maximum efficacy of both ciclesonide and budesonide was the same, the onset speed of ciclesonide was faster than that of budesonide. The above information provides the necessary quantitative information for the implementation of medication guidelines for steps 2-3 asthma in children.

Co-inhalation of roflumilast, rather than formoterol, with fluticasone more effectively improves asthma in asthmatic mice

Roflumilast is approved as an add-on therapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The inflammation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is mainly neutrophilic, while in asthma it is mainly eosinophilic, studies addressing role of roflumilast in eosinophilic inflammation are recommended. Also in severe asthma, the dominant inflammatory cells are neutrophils. Thus, roflumilast has a potential off-label use in the treatment of asthma. This study was designed to evaluate the effects of co-inhalation of roflumilast and fluticasone compared to that of formoterol and fluticasone in ovalbumin-sensitized and-challenged BALB/c mice. Besides normal control group, the ovalbumin-asthmatic mice were randomly divided into seven groups (n = 8): positive control, vehicle-treated, and five drug-treated groups. Treatments (µg/kg) were given as 15 min-inhalation once/day for five days as follows: roflumilast (500), formoterol (50), fluticasone (1000), roflumilast + fluticasone (500 + 1000), and formoterol + fluticasone (50 + 1000). Penh values were measured in conscious unrestrained mice using the single-chamber whole-body plethysmography. Airway hyperreactivity to inhaled methacholine was evaluated. Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid was used for the measurements of levels of IL-4, IL-5, TNF-α, OVA-specific IgE, and total and differential white cells. Lung sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin and periodic acid-Schiff. The asthmatic mice showed significant increases in airway hyperreactivity which were significantly reversed by the combination treatments. The asthmatic mice showed significant increases in levels of IL-4, IL-5, TNF-α, ovalbumin-specific IgE, and total and differential white cells in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. All treatments (except formoterol) significantly reversed these changes mainly with roflumilast + fluticasone. The asthmatic mice showed severe inflammatory infiltration and goblet cell hyperplasia which were maximally reversed by roflumilast + fluticasone, while minimally reversed by formoterol. In conclusion, co-inhalation of roflumilast + fluticasone more significantly improved inflammation and histopathological changes than co-inhalation of formoterol + fluticasone in ovalumin-asthmatic mice. Further studies are needed to help confirm the potential off-label add-on use of roflumilast in typical and atypical asthma and asthma-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease overlap syndrome. Impact statement Roflumilast, a selective phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor, was approved for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This study showed that co-inhalation of roflumilast and fluticasone significantly decreased airway hyperresponsiveness in ovalumin-asthmatic mice. Also, it more significantly improved inflammation and histopathological changes than co-inhalation of formoterol and fluticasone. The current results showed that inhaled roflumilast reduced counts of eosinophils, neutrophils, and macrophages in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. Consequently, inhaled roflumilast might be of potential off-label benefit in treatment of eosinophilic and neutrophilic asthma and asthma-COPD overlap syndrome (ACOS). These results could also support other experimental and clinical studies addressing the same issue.

Management of Eosinophilic Esophagitis During Pregnancy

There are currently limited data on the management of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) during pregnancy. At our center, however, we have followed several pregnant women with EoE and others have asked pertinent questions in pre-pregnancy counseling. The relatively young age of patients with EoE implies that many practitioners will also encounter patients with these questions. In this review, we use four cases to prompt a discussion about concerns focused on the safety of steroids and diet therapy during pregnancy and breast-feeding, potential nutritional risks with dietary elimination, how to optimize therapy, and whether endoscopic evaluation for monitoring of disease activity is safe during pregnancy and breast-feeding. An additional concern is whether the disease could progress during pregnancy and breast-feeding if no therapies are used. Although there are no studies specifically examining pregnant EoE patients, we have reviewed the literature relevant to this population as informed by the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease patients during pregnancy, where these issues have been studied in more depth. Providers who care for EoE patients who could become pregnant should familiarize themselves with these issues.

Fluticasone propionate/formoterol fumarate in fixed-dose combination for the treatment of asthma

A new combination inhaler containing fluticasone, a potent inhaled corticosteroid (ICS), and formoterol, a long-acting β-agonist (LABA) with rapid onset and sustained bronchodilator effect, has been approved for treatment of persistent asthma in patients ≥12 years of age requiring combination ICS-LABA therapy. The fluticasone/formoterol combination, delivered via pressurized metered-dose inhaler and available in three dose strengths, has demonstrated a good safety and tolerability profile in trials of up to 1 year. The efficacy of fluticasone/formoterol is greater than that of fluticasone or formoterol alone and noninferior to that of fluticasone/salmeterol and budesonide/formoterol in tightly controlled 8-12-week clinical trials. Advantages of the fluticasone/formoterol combination aerosol include rapid onset of bronchodilation, an attribute preferred by patients, and emission of a high fine-particle fraction that is consistent at different flow rates, which may aid consistency of delivery (given patient variability in inhalation maneuvers) and provide real-life benefits.

Fluticasone propionate/formoterol fumarate: a review of its use in persistent asthma

The corticosteroid fluticasone propionate (fluticasone) and the long-acting β₂-adrenoceptor agonist formoterol fumarate (formoterol) have been combined in a single, pressurized, metered-dose, aerosol inhaler for the maintenance treatment of patients aged ≥12 years with persistent asthma. This article reviews the clinical efficacy and tolerability of fluticasone/formoterol, with a brief summary of pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties of the individual drugs. In well designed 8- and 12-week clinical trials in patients with asthma, twice-daily fluticasone/formoterol 100/10, 250/10 (adults and adolescents) or 500/20 μg (adults only) demonstrated rapid and sustained improvements in lung function and asthma control. Improvements achieved with the fixed combination were greater than those achieved with placebo or monotherapy with either of the same respective dosages of fluticasone or formoterol, and similar to those demonstrated when the individual components were administered via separate inhalers concurrently. The efficacy of fluticasone/formoterol was noninferior to that of fluticasone/salmeterol or budesonide/formoterol. Fluticasone/formoterol demonstrated a faster onset of bronchodilation than fluticasone/salmeterol. Fluticasone/formoterol was generally well tolerated, including during treatment periods of up to 12 months. The tolerability profile of fluticasone/formoterol was generally similar to that of fluticasone/salmeterol or budesonide/formoterol.

Fluticasone furoate, a novel inhaled corticosteroid, demonstrates prolonged lung absorption kinetics in man compared with inhaled fluticasone propionate

Background

Fluticasone furoate (FF; GW685698) is a novel inhaled corticosteroid that is active at 24 h and under development for once-daily administration in combination with the long-acting β₂-adrenoceptor agonist vilanterol (GW642444) for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma. In vitro studies examining the respiratory tissue-binding properties of corticosteroids showed FF to have the largest cellular accumulation and slowest rate of efflux compared with other clinically used inhaled corticosteroids, consistent with greater tissue retention. The enhanced affinity of the glucocorticoid receptor binding of FF, coupled with its extended tissue association, may be expected to lead to greater and more prolonged anti-inflammatory effects and should provide relevant once-daily efficacy.

Objective

The aim of this study was to assess the rate and extent of systemic absorption of FF from the lung following inhaled administration of FF from three exploratory dry powder formulations (via DISKHALER^®) compared with inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP) [via DISKHALER^®] using deconvolution analysis.

Methods

This open-label, part-randomized, six-way crossover study evaluated three early development dry powder inhaled formulations of FF administered as single doses via DISKHALER^®. Healthy male subjects (n = 24) each received FF (2,000 μg; three formulations), inhaled FP (1,000 μg; via DISKHALER^®) and 250 μg of each molecule by intravenous infusion. The bioavailability of both inhaled FF and FP represents absorption from the lung as the oral bioavailability from the swallowed portion of the inhaled dose is negligible (<1.5 %). To investigate the absorption kinetics from the lung, the inhaled concentration–time data were subjected to deconvolution analysis using derived pharmacokinetic parameters from fitting of the intravenous concentration–time data.

Results

The terminal elimination half-life (t_½β) for inhaled FF was considerably longer (range 17–24 h) than the t_½β estimated for intravenous FF (14 h), whereas t_½β for FP was similar whether inhaled or given intravenously (11 and 14 h, respectively). This would suggest that FF is exhibiting absorption rate-limited pharmacokinetics following inhaled FF dosing and that the apparent t_½β is an estimate of absorption rate. The lung mean absorption time for FF was approximately 7 h irrespective of formulation, which was considerably longer than FP (2.1 h). The time for 90 % absorption from the lung was significantly longer for FF (20–30 h) than for FP (8 h), indicating a significantly longer lung retention time for FF.

Conclusion

In comparison with inhaled FP, inhaled FF (independent of formulation) demonstrated prolonged absorption from the lung into the systemic circulation, indicating a longer lung retention time and suggesting the potential for maintained efficacy with once-daily administration.

Cost effectiveness of fluticasone and budesonide in patients with moderate asthma

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to assess the relative cost effectiveness of fluticasone via metered dose inhaler and budesonide via Turbuhaler((R)) in corticosteroid-naive patients with moderate asthma from a third-party payer perspective (German Sickness Funds).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective economic assessment of direct medication costs of treatment was performed on data from a prospective, randomised, parallel group, 6-week clinical trial. 457 corticosteroid-naive patients between the ages of 18 and 70 years with moderate asthma were included in the intention-to-treat analysis.

RESULTS

The fluticasone group had a higher proportion of successfully treated patients (those with a peak expiratory flow rate improvement of >/=10%) [47 vs 42%], a higher average proportion of symptom-free days (40 vs 34%) and lower direct healthcare costs [1997 Deutschmarks (DM)] per day (DM4.23 vs DM5.19) than the budesonide group. Therefore, the daily costs per successfully treated patient (DM9.00 vs DM12.36) and the cost per symptom-free day (DM10.58 vs DM15.26) were both lower with fluticasone than with budesonide. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated that these results were relatively robust over a wide range of plausible assumptions.

CONCLUSION

These results showed that from the perspective of a third-party payer, fluticasone was more cost effective than budesonide over the 6-week study period.

Chronotherapeutics--a chronopharmaceutical approach to drug delivery in the treatment of asthma

Bronchial asthma is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the airways associated with airflow obstruction that is reversible spontaneously or with treatment. Bronchial asthma is a disease based on established circadian rhythm. The symptoms of asthma worsen during midnight to early morning and therefore it is required to deliver the drug in such fashion that effective treatment can be obtained during the time of asthma attacks. Chronotherapy is an approach that fulfills the criteria of drug delivery at a specific time as per the pathophysiological need of the disease, to improve patient compliance. The current article focuses on the chronotherapy of bronchial asthma, methodologies involved for the existing systems, recent updates and different chronopharmaceutical technologies currently available in the market. Chronotherapy with different categories of bronchial asthma medications also has been reviewed.

Inhaled Salmeterol/Fluticasone Propionate Combination in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Salmeterol/fluticasone propionate is a fixed-dose combination of the long-acting beta2-adrenoceptor agonist salmeterol and the corticosteroid fluticasone propionate and is inhaled via the Diskus powder inhaler. In three randomized, double-blind, 24-week or 52-week studies in >2850 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), administration of salmeterol/fluticasone propionate 50/250 microg twice daily (in one study) and salmeterol/fluticasone propionate 50/500 microg twice daily (in the other studies) provided greater improvement in lung function than placebo or either component alone at the same nominal dosage. Both strengths of the combination product administered twice daily resulted in clinically meaningful increases in scores in health-related quality-of-life questionnaires that were specific for respiratory disease. Improvements in this and almost all other secondary measures of efficacy, including symptomatic outcomes, were significantly greater with the combination product than with placebo. Administration of salmeterol/fluticasone propionate as a combination product did not result in any untoward interactions that affected the pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic or tolerability profiles of the individual components. Candidiasis, hoarseness/dysphonia, throat irritation and headache occurred more frequently with salmeterol/fluticasone propionate than with placebo in patients with COPD.

Glucocorticoids enhance airway epithelial barrier integrity

Asthma is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the airways, but its pathogenesis is incompletely understood. While asthma is a complex disease caused by multiple factors, epithelial barrier damage is a cardinal feature. Glucocorticoids (GCs) are the most effective anti-inflammatory drugs in the treatment of asthma. However, the effects of GCs on the airway epithelial barrier have not been evaluated. Epithelial barrier functions were evaluated in cultured human airway epithelial cell monolayers, Calu-3 and 16HBE. Then, the cells were treated with dexamethasone (Dex), fulticasone propionate (FP), or budesonide (BD) for 5 days. Permeability measured by transepithelial electrical resistance was increased by treatment with Dex, FP, and BD in a dose-dependent manner. Permeability to fluorescein isothiocyanate-labeled dextran was markedly reduced by these treatments. Immunocytostaining revealed that Dex treatment potentiated tight junction formation in these polarized epithelial cells. Knockdown of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) by small interference RNA blunted the effects of Dex on barrier integrity. Although EGFR expression was not affected by Dex treatment, EGFR phosphorylation was enhanced in Dex-treated cells. This is suggesting that EGFR are important for this phenomenon. These findings suggest that GC inhalation therapy can improve epithelial barrier integrity and might contribute to the therapeutic effects of GCs for treating asthma.

Chronobiology and chronotherapy of allergic rhinitis and bronchial asthma

Study of the chronobiology of allergic rhinitis (AR) and bronchial asthma (BA) and the chronopharmacology and chronotherapy of the medications used in their treatment began five decades ago. AR is an inflammatory disease of the upper airway tissue with hypersensitivity to specific environmental antigens, resulting in further local inflammation, vasomotor changes, and mucus hypersecretion. Symptoms include sneezing, nasal congestion, and runny and itchy nose. Approximately 25% of children and 40% of adults in USA are affected by AR during one or more seasons of the year. The manifestation and severity of AR symptoms exhibit prominent 24-h variation; in most persons they are worse overnight or early in the morning and often comprise nighttime sleep, resulting in poor daytime quality of life, compromised school and work performance, and irritability and moodiness. BA is also an inflammatory medical condition of the lower airways characterized by hypersensitivity to specific environmental antigens, resulting in greater local inflammation as well as bronchoconstriction, vasomotor change, and mucus hypersecretion. In USA an estimated 6.5 million children and 15.7 million adults have BA. The onset and worsening of BA are signaled by chest wheeze and/or croupy cough and difficult and labored breathing. Like AR, BA is primarily a nighttime medical condition. AR is treated with H1-antagonist, decongestant, and anti-inflammatory (glucocorticoid and leukotriene receptor antagonist and modifier) medications. Only H1-antagonist AR medications have been studied for their chronopharmacology and potential chronotherapy. BA is treated with some of the same medications and also theophylline and beta2-agonists. The chronopharmacology and chronotherapy of many classes of BA medications have been explored. This article reviews the rather extensive knowledge of the chronobiology of AR and BA and the chronopharmacology and chronotherapy of the various medications used in their treatment.

Clinical safety of inhaled corticosteroids for asthma in children: an update of long-term trials

Inhaled corticosteroids are established as the mainstay of maintenance therapy for chronic asthma. However, there remains some debate regarding the safety of long-term use of these agents, particularly in children. This concern mainly stems from the findings of short-term studies assessing the effects of inhaled corticosteroids on lower leg growth rate or the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. However, the clinical relevance of these findings to long-term treatment is unknown and significant uncertainty exists regarding the predictive value of changes in cortisol levels and clinically relevant changes in growth or bone mineral density. To assess the safety of long-term use of inhaled corticosteroids in children with asthma, a systematic review of the literature was performed focusing on randomised, controlled studies of >or=12 months' duration, to obtain data with maximum relevance to clinical practice. Specific searches were conducted to identify studies examining each of the following three areas: growth, bone mineral density and cortisol levels. Fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria for statural growth, four for bone mineral density, and ten for cortisol levels. There was some evidence of a small decrease in statural growth during the initial period of inhaled corticosteroid therapy. This effect was more marked at daily doses of >200 microg and did not apply to all treatment regimens. Studies examining final attained adult height found no difference between patients treated with inhaled corticosteroids and those receiving nonsteroidal therapy. None of the studies investigating effects on bone mineral density found any adverse effects of inhaled corticosteroid therapy. Finally, recommended doses of inhaled corticosteroids generally had little or no effect on plasma- or urinary-cortisol levels versus nonsteroidal therapy. In conclusion, this literature review supports the theory that recommended doses of inhaled corticosteroids can be administered to children for the long-term management of asthma with minimal risk of clinically relevant adverse effects on growth, bone density or cortisol levels.

Inhaled Corticosteroids Adverse Events In Asthmatic Children: A Review

BACKGROUND: Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) have an important role in the treatment of chronic asthma in children. The prevalence of asthma symptoms in children varies from 0 to 30 percent in different populations with the highest prevalence occurring in Australia, New Zealand and England. METHODS: A review of the literature and studies about inhaled corticosteroids safety, action and adverse events in children and adults where applicable was done. CONCLUSION: Inhaled corticosteroids are the main stay therapy for persistent asthma in children. Their safety and efficacy is proven from the literature. Proper education of the parents about asthma and inhaled corticosteroids is very important and improve asthma control. Keeping in mind to taper the inhaled corticosteroids to the lowest dose needed to control asthma and using correct inhalation technique by the use of spacers with metered dose inhalers or dry powder inhalers (Turbuhaler and Diskus) will prevent the occurrence of adverse events.

Safety of inhaled corticosteroids: room for improvement

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are the standard of care in asthma and are widely used in the treatment of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. High-dose regimens and long-term use of ICS in predisposed individuals may be associated with a variety of side effects, similar to those observed with systemic corticosteroid therapy. Side effects associated with long-term ICS use include reduction in growth velocity, cataracts, glaucoma, osteoporosis, and fractures. Fear of unwanted complications may be of concern in all patients using ICS, particularly in age- and gender-specific populations that are more prone to develop side effects or to reduce treatment adherence because of physical, behavioral, or psychological problems. In addition to concerns about ICS safety, dosing regimens that are difficult to follow may further reduce a patient's ability to comply with treatment. Ciclesonide, a new-generation ICS with unique pharmacokinetic properties, was developed to provide effective anti-inflammatory control for asthma with once-daily administration to improve patient adherence and a high safety profile to reduce the occurrence of local and systemic side effects.

Corticosteroids: the mainstay in asthma therapy

Inflammation is now marked as a central feature of asthma pathophysiology and aims of current asthma management are not only to treat acute symptoms of wheezing, breathlessness, chest tightness, cough but also to suppress the underlying inflammatory component. Despite the availability of a number of drugs, corticosteroids remain the mainstay in the management of all types of asthma as these are the most potent and effective antiinflammatory agents available so far. Corticosteroids suppress virtually every step in inflammation. However therapeutic doses of oral glucocorticoids are associated with a range of adverse reactions. To overcome these side effects, inhalations have been developed to deliver glucocorticoids directly to the lungs and in the process a number of aerosol preparations have become available, which have advantage of significantly lower toxicity due to low systemic absorption from the respiratory tract and rapid inactivation. Despite considerable efforts by pharmaceutical industry, it has been difficult to develop novel therapeutic agents for asthma management, which could surpass inhaled corticosteroids. Currently the data favours using inhaled corticosteroids as monotherapy in the majority of patients in all kinds of asthma. If combination therapy is recommended to achieve additional control in severe asthma cases, other drugs such as beta-agonists, antileukotrienes, theophylline, etc. are considered as adjunct therapies to corticosteroids. This review discusses the importance of corticosteroids as first line therapy for asthma treatment with the availability of inhaled corticosteroids for chronic treatment and oral formulations for treating acute exacerbations of moderate to severe asthma.

Decreased cortisol response to insulin induced hypoglycaemia in asthmatics treated with inhaled fluticasone propionate

AIMS

To assess adrenal function in asthmatic children treated with inhaled fluticasone propionate for up to 16 weeks.

METHODS

Children with asthma and bronchial hyperresponsiveness to inhaled methacholine were treated with inhaled fluticasone 250-750 microg/day via Volumatic spacer. The insulin tolerance test (ITT) was performed to assess adrenal function.

RESULTS

Eighteen asthmatic patients (10 boys, 8 girls), aged 7-17 years received inhaled fluticasone therapy at a median dose of 477 microg/m2 per day for 5-16 weeks. Adrenal suppression, defined as 60 minute serum cortisol less than 500 nmol/l, was found in 9 of 18 children. Following the ITT, the median basal and 60 minute serum cortisol concentrations of the suppressed group were 135.0 and 350.0 nmol/l, respectively; the corresponding values for the unsuppressed group were 242.2 and 564.7 nmol/l. Repeat ITT in the suppressed group 2-3 months after discontinuation of fluticasone revealed that all patients had a 60 minute serum cortisol greater than 500 nmol/l.

CONCLUSION

After therapy for asthma with inhaled fluticasone at approximately 500 microg daily for up to 16 weeks, half the children had evidence of adrenal suppression.

Safety of the newer inhaled corticosteroids in childhood asthma

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) remain a vital part of the management of persistent asthma, but concerns have been raised about their potential adverse effects in children. This review examines the safety data on three new ICS - fluticasone propionate, mometasone, and extrafine beclomethasone in hydrofluoroalkane (HFA-134a) propellant (QVAR The use of tradenames is for product identification purposes only and does not imply endorsement. formulation) in relation to the older corticosteroids. Topical adverse effects such as thrush and dysphonia are rare, but dental erosion is a possibility with powder forms of ICS because of their low pH. Thus, it is important to stress mouth rinsing after administration and maintaining good dental hygiene to minimize this risk. Biochemical adrenal suppression can be readily demonstrated, particularly with high doses of all ICS. The clinical relevance of this was uncertain in the past, but there have now been >50 reported cases of acute adrenal crises in children receiving ICS, most of whom were on fluticasone propionate. In order to minimize the risk of symptomatic adrenal suppression, it is important to back-titrate the ICS dose and alert families of children receiving high-dose ICS of this potential adverse effect. A pediatric endocrine opinion should be sought if adrenal suppression is suspected. The older ICS cause temporary slowing of growth velocity, but the limited data available do not show any significant compromise of final adult height. The effect on growth of fluticasone propionate may not be as great as with the older ICS, but the studies have been short term and only used low doses of fluticasone propionate. There have been case reports of growth suppression in children receiving high doses of fluticasone propionate. The limited studies performed on the effect of ICS on bone mineral density in children did not show any adverse effects, but there may be an increased risk of fractures. Hydrofluoroalkane beclomethasone (QVAR) is essentially the same drug as chlorofluorocarbon beclomethasone, but with double the lung deposition owing to the smaller particle size. Thus, it could be expected that any adverse effects seen with chlorofluorocarbon beclomethasone would be the same with hydrofluoroalkane beclomethasone. However, some of the published data, particularly in adults, suggest that hydrofluoroalkane beclomethasone may be less systemically active than chlorofluorocarbon beclomethasone, even at equipotent doses. As yet, there are no long-term data on mometasone, but initial studies in adults suggest there may be less suppression of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, although further studies are required, particularly in children.ICS will remain a cornerstone in the management of persistent pediatric asthma, provided that the diagnosis of asthma is secure. It is very important to use ICS appropriately and to ensure the lowest possible doses are used to achieve symptom control, thus minimizing the risk of serious adverse effects.

Improvement of clinical and immunopathologic parameters in asthmatic children treated for concomitant chronic rhinosinusitis

BACKGROUND

Chronic rhinosinusitis is frequently associated with asthma. A Th2 cytokine pattern has been recently reported in chronic rhinosinusitis in asthmatic children.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effects of treating concomitant chronic rhinosinusitis on respiratory symptoms and function and immunopathological parameters in asthmatic children.

METHODS

Eighteen children with moderate asthma (age range, 5 to 12 years) poorly controlled by high doses of inhaled corticosteroids and chronic rhinosinusitis were evaluated for symptoms, spirometry, and inflammation at baseline, after treatment, and 1 month after suspension of treatment. All of the children were treated with a combination of amoxicillin and clavulanate (20 mg/kg twice daily) and fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray (100 microg/d) for 14 days. A short course of oral corticosteroids was also prescribed (deflazacort, 1 mg/kg daily for 2 days, 0.5 mg/kg daily for 4 days, and 0.25 mg/kg daily for 4 days). Rhinosinusal lavage for cytokine measurements and a nasal scraping for cytologic analysis were performed in all patients before and after medical treatment.

RESULTS

A negative endoscopy result was demonstrated in 15 children after treatment. Symptoms and respiratory function significantly improved after treatment and 1 month later; 8 children had intermittent asthma and 10 had mild asthma. A significant reduction of inflammatory cell numbers was detected in all asthmatic children. Interleukin 4 levels significantly decreased (P < 0.001), whereas interferon-y levels increased (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis is able to improve symptoms and respiratory function in asthmatic children, reducing inflammatory cells and reversing the cytokine pattern from a Th2 toward a Th1 profile.

Fluticasone and beclometasone: what are their effects on children's growth?

Fear of growth retardation may account for the underuse of inhaled corticosteroids in children with asthma, despite compelling evidence of their effectiveness. This fear may be reduced with newer agents with lower oral bioavailability if their theoretical advantage of fewer systemic adverse effects than the standard treatment of inhaled beclometasone is realized in practice. This review aims to determine if one of the newer agents, inhaled fluticasone, has less effect on the growth of pre-pubertal asthmatic children than inhaled beclometasone. The outcome measure was growth velocity. Two double blind, randomized controlled trials were identified. In one of the studies the mean growth velocity in the fluticasone group was 0.7 cm/year greater than in the beclometasone group. In the second, smaller study the mean growth velocity in the fluticasone group was 0.8 cm/year greater. There is therefore some evidence that fluticasone has less (if any) adverse effect on growth.

Adrenal suppression in asthmatic children receiving low-dose inhaled budesonide: comparison between dry powder inhaler and pressurized metered-dose inhaler attached to a spacer

BACKGROUND

Dry powder inhalers (DPI) have in recent years become a common mode for administration of inhaled corticosteroids for preventive therapy of asthma. Inhaled steroids delivered by DPI achieve increased lung deposition compared with pressurized metered-dose inhalers (pMDI), which is associated with increased therapeutic effect. This may be associated with increased systemic absorption.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of adrenal suppression in children using low-dose budesonide given by DPI, as compared with pMDI attached to a large-volume spacer device (pMDI + spacer).

METHODS

In an open-labeled crossover study, 15 asthmatic children aged 5 to 15 years received 200 microg of inhaled budesonide twice daily by DPI (Turbuhaler, Astra, Draco AB, Lund, Sweden) and by pMDI + spacer, 1 month each, in a randomized order. Twenty-four-hour urine collections were performed at baseline and at the end of each of the 2 months of the study period, and urinary cortisol and creatinine were measured.

RESULTS

Baseline urinary cortisol:creatinine was 0.038 +/- 0.012 microg/mg, similar in both groups. After 1 month of DPI therapy, urinary cortisol:creatinine was reduced by 27 +/- 16% to 0.028 +/- 0.012 microg/mg (P = 0.018). Urinary cortisol:creatinine after 1 month of pMDI + spacer therapy was similar to baseline 0.037 +/- 0.019 microg/mg (P = 0.78).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of asthmatic children with budesonide 400 microg daily given via a DPI for 1 month was associated with hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis suppression. This effect was not observed with the same dose of budesonide administered via pMDI + spacer. This indicates that systemic absorption might be reduced with pMDI + spacer therapy.

Effects of budesonide and fluticasone propionate in a placebo-controlled study on symptoms and quality of life in seasonal allergic rhinitis

BACKGROUND

Intranasal glucocorticosteroids are effective in seasonal allergic rhinitis. This study compared the efficacy of budesonide (Rhinocort Turbuhaler) and fluticasone propionate (Flixonase) in this respect.

METHODS

Patients (n = 280) were randomized to receive budesonide, 140 microg (delivered dose) once daily, fluticasone, 200 microg once daily, or matching placebos for 5 weeks. The primary efficacy variable was the change in combined nasal symptom (nasal blockage, runny nose, sneezing) scores. Quality of life was measured in 121 patients by means of the Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) and the Short-form Health Survey (SF-36).

RESULTS

Both steroids significantly reduced combined nasal symptoms, compared with placebo. There was no significant difference between the two treatments. Substantial or total symptom control was achieved in 89.9% of the budesonide-treated patients, compared with 88.7% with fluticasone and 42.7% with placebo. Four of the five domains of the RQLQ were significantly improved with budesonide, whereas with fluticasone only two domains were improved. Budesonide significantly improved scores in five out of eight domains of the SF-36, whereas no domains were improved with fluticasone.

CONCLUSION

There was no significant difference in efficacy between budesonide and fluticasone in this study. However, greater improvements in quality of life were seen with budesonide than with fluticasone.

Absorption kinetics after inhalation of fluticasone propionate via the Diskhaler, Diskus and metered-dose inhaler in healthy volunteers

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this analysis was to assess the rate and extent of systemic availability of inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP) from 2 dry powder systems (Diskhaler and Diskus) and a metered-dose inhaler (MDI) by deconvolution analysis.

METHODS

The inhalation devices were evaluated in 3 separate studies with identical protocols. 12 healthy male volunteers were randomised to receive FP given as a 1000 microg inhaled dose and 250 microg by intravenous infusion according to a double-blind double-dummy crossover design. The bioavailability of FP after inhalation represents absorption of the drug from the lungs, since the bioavailability of the swallowed portion of the inhaled dose is negligible.

RESULTS

When corrected for the bioavailability (of FP) achieved by each inhalation device, the rate of absorption of FP over the first 2 hours was rapid from all devices. The mean time for absorption of 50% of the bioavailable dose was 1.6, 2.4, and 2.2 hours for the Diskhaler, Diskus and MDI, respectively. Thereafter, absorption from each device was prolonged, with approximately 10% of the dose remaining in the lungs 12 hours after inhalation.

CONCLUSION

Irrespective of the inhalation device used, the prolonged absorption of FP into the systemic circulation indicates a long residence time in the lungs.

Comparison of the systemic availability of fluticasone propionate in healthy volunteers and patients with asthma

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this analysis was to compare the systemic exposure to inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP) after administration of either single or repeated dose regimens via dry powder and metered-dose inhalers in patients with asthma and healthy volunteers.

BACKGROUND

The pharmacokinetics of FP, a topically active glucocorticoid administered by inhalation for the treatment of asthma and rhinitis, are well characterised in healthy volunteers. As asthma is characterised by pathophysiological changes in the lung, it may be inappropriate to use data from studies in healthy volunteers to predict the deposition and absorption of FP in patients with asthma.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Pooled data from 13 pharmacokinetic studies showed that the systemic availability of FP (measured as area under the plasma FP concentration-time curve) after single or multiple administration by inhalation was 2 to 3 times lower in patients with asthma than in healthy volunteers. This observation correlated well with the systemic effects of FP in the 2 groups. Reduction in 24-hour urinary cortisol excretion after inhalation of FP (determined in 9 of the studies) was greater in healthy volunteers than in patients with asthma. The hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis suppression caused by systemic exposure to FP in adults with asthma is therefore substantially less than that in healthy volunteers.

CONCLUSION

Differences in the deposition of FP in the lungs of patients with asthma, probably caused by obstructed inspiratory airflow, may explain this observation.

The relationship between systemic exposure to fluticasone propionate and cortisol reduction in healthy male volunteers

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this analysis was to assess the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationship between systemic exposure to fluticasone propionate (FP) and reductions in the plasma cortisol level and urinary cortisol excretion.

METHODS

A total of 122 healthy male volunteers participating in 7 different studies received either oral (5 to 40 mg), inhaled (500 to 2000 microg) or intravenous (250 to 1000 g) single morning doses of FP or placebo. Data on systemic exposure to FP, expressed in terms of the area under the FP concentration-time curve up to 24 hours (AUC(24h,FP)) for the 3 different routes of administration were pooled, together with corresponding data on the 24-hour plasma cortisol level or urinary cortisol excretion. The data were used to develop a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model, from which parameter estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the estimates could be derived.

RESULTS

The intercept in the absence of drug (E0) was -0.5% (95% CI: -0.6, -0.3%) and the maximum drug-induced reduction in mean plasma cortisol levels (Emax) was 72% (95% CI: 64, 79%). The systemic exposure to FP that resulted in half the maximum possible reduction in plasma cortisol levels (AUC50) was 3.2 microg/L x h (95% CI: 2.8, 3.7 microg/L x h); this equates approximately to the plasma FP concentration obtained after administration of a 1000 microg inhaled dose. A similar relationship was seen between AUC50 and urinary cortisol excretion, although the variability in AUC50 for urinary cortisol was much greater than for plasma cortisol.

CONCLUSION

A pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model has been established which relates systemic exposure to FP (after a single morning dose) to the percentage reduction in urinary or plasma cortisol. The relationship is independent of both dose and route of administration.

Inhaled salmeterol/fluticasone propionate combination: a review of its use in persistent asthma

The long-acting beta2-agonist salmeterol and the corticosteroid fluticasone propionate are available as a combination inhalation device for the treatment of persistent asthma. Well designed studies in adults, adolescents and children aged > or =4 years, demonstrate that combined salmetero/fluticasone propionate 50/100, 50/250 and 50/500 microg administered via a dry powder inhaler (DPI) is clinically equivalent to concurrent delivery of the same dosages of the 2 drugs via separate DPIs. In adults and adolescents, combined salmeterol/fluticasone 50/100 and 50/250 microg twice daily produced rapid improvements in lung function that were consistently greater than those in patients receiving monotherapy twice daily salmeterol 50 microg, fluticasone propionate 100 or 250 microg or placebo in 2 well designed studies. Recipients of the combination had a significantly greater probability of completing 12 weeks of treatment than patients receiving monotherapy or placebo. The combination also produced significant improvements between baseline and end-point in all secondary outcome variables (morning and evening peak expiratory flow, daytime symptom scores, days and nights without asthma symptoms and requirements for as-needed beta-agonists) and health-related quality of life (QOL). Combination therapy was superior to monotherapy with salmeterol and placebo for all outcomes in both studies, and was superior to fluticasone propionate 100 microg for all but 1 outcome (nights without awakenings) in 1 study. Similar results were obtained in patients who had previously been using short acting beta2-agonists alone. Combined twice daily salmeterolfluticasone propionate 50/100 and 50/250 microg produced greater improvements in lung function than inhaled budesonide at higher dosages than fluticasone propionate in the combination. Combined salmeterol/fluticasone propionate 50/250 microg produced similar improvements in lung function to concurrent budesonide 800 microg plus formoterol 12 microg when given twice daily for 12 weeks. In another 12-week trial, combined salmeterol/fluticasone propionate 50/100 microg was more effective than oral montelukast 10 mg/day plus fluticasone propionate 100 microg twice daily in patients with suboptimally controlled asthma. Salmeterol/fluticasone is more cost effective than monotherapy with fluticasone propionate or budesonide. The most frequent adverse events associated with salmeterol/fluticasone propionate are headache, throat irritation, hoarseness and candidiasis.

CONCLUSION

Combined salmeterol/fluticasone propionate is as effective as the 2 drugs given concurrently via separate inhalers and significantly more effective than either drug given alone at the same nominal dosage. The combination is also significantly more effective than montelukast plus fluticasone propionate or monotherapy with inhaled budesonide. Furthermore, the combination is more cost effective than inhaled corticosteroid monotherapy.

Body composition and growth in asthmatic children treated with inhaled steroids

BACKGROUND

Prolonged treatment with inhaled steroids is recommended for long-term control of asthma in children; however, it can interfere with growth and body composition.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to answer the question whether 6 months treatment with inhaled steroids causes body fat accumulation and growth velocity reduction.

METHODS

Hospital-based, open study of body composition [by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) and skinfolds] and growth of 26 asthmatic children, treated for 6 months with inhaled steroids [budesonide (BUD) 400 microg/day (group 1) or fluticasone proprionate (FP) 200 microg/day (group 2)], sodium cromoglycate and beta2-agonist (salbutamol) compared with a control group of 16 asthmatic children treated only with sodium cromoglycate and beta2-agonist.

RESULTS

On average, total and regional fat mass, adjusted for pubertal stage and gender, and growth velocity were similar in all three groups of patients and were not influenced by treatment (% mean change +/- 1 SD of fat mass during treatment in BUD 0.1 +/- 3.0%, FP -1.1 +/- 3%, and control -2.8 +/- 3.5%; ANOVA P > or = .05); however seven patients, two in group 1 (1 preschool child), three in group 2 (2 preschool children) and two in the control group (two prepubertal boys aged 8.5 and 9.5 year), during treatment, showed a growth velocity standard deviation score below the third percentile.

CONCLUSION

A 6-month treatment with inhaled BUD and FP does not induce body fat accumulation; however, in a few preschool children the treatment was associated with growth velocity below the third percentile. Our results suggest the need for constant monitoring of growth in all asthmatic children on chronic treatment with inhaled steroids. Further studies devoted to the effects of inhaled steroids use in preschool children are needed.

Fluticasone propionate: a potent inhaled corticosteroid for the treatment of asthma

Fluticasone propionate (FP) is a potent inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) for the treatment of asthma. It is currently marketed in both the United States (as Flovent) and Europe (as Flixotide). Fluticasone is available in both aerosolised metered dose inhaler (MDI) and dry powder devices, with dosages ranging from 44-500 micrograms/puff. FP has been extensively studied in both children and adults; efficacy has been documented across the entire spectrum of asthma severity, including corticosteroid-dependent disease. Clinical data with FP strongly corroborates the in vitro pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies that FP is at least twice as potent as beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP), budesonide (BUD) or triamcinolone acetonide (TAA). Both objective (lung function) and subjective (symptoms, beta-agonist use and quality of life) outcomes are improved with FP treatment. Extensive post-marketing surveillance with FP suggests that it is more cost-effective than BUD and flunisolide (FLU) when analysed by an overall healthcare cost perspective. Most of the benefits arise from decreased hospitalizations, emergency room visits and physician-office visits. Extensive safety data with FP documents no clinically meaningful effects on bone mass, nor impairment of growth velocity in children. Considering the efficacy and safety data along with the ability to optimise patient's asthma therapy using the delivery devices and strengths available, FP has become a leader in the ICS marketplace to date.

Effects of several glucocorticosteroids and PDE4 inhibitors on increases in total lung eosinophil peroxidase (EPO) levels following either systemic or intratracheal administration in sephadex- or ovalbumin-induced inflammatory models

Representative glucocorticosteroids (GCS) and phosphodiesterase IV (PDE4) inhibitors were compared in several models of pulmonary inflammation ranging in severity. Lung tissue eosinophil peroxidase (EPO) levels rather than bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) EPO or eosinophil percentages were used to indicate eosinophil recruitment after intratracheal instillation of sephadex beads in rats or nebulized ovalbumin in sensitized guinea pigs. A single oral or intratracheal administration of a GCS was effective against mild and robust sephadex-induced eosinophilia whereas the PDE4 inhibitors evaluated appeared more effective in the milder sephadex models. The GCS were also more effective against sephadex-induced than ovalbumin-induced eosinophilia. The effectiveness of the GCS and PDE4 inhibitors improved when the severity of the ovalbumin-induced eosinophilia was decreased. Multiple day dosing also improved activity. These studies indicated that activity was influenced greatly by administration protocols, the severity of the inflammatory response and possibly the method used for estimating eosinophil recruitment.

Salmeterol/fluticasone propionate (50/100 microg) in combination in a Diskus inhaler (Seretide) is effective and safe in children with asthma

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety in children of salmeterol (50 microg twice daily) plus fluticasone propionate (100 microg twice daily) when delivered together via a single Diskus inhaler (Seretide; combination therapy) or concurrently using two separate Diskus inhalers (concurrent therapy). In a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group study, 257 children with reversible airways obstruction who remained symptomatic on inhaled corticosteroids (200-500 microg daily) alone were randomized to combination or concurrent therapy for 12 weeks. Efficacy was assessed by measuring daily peak expiratory flow (PEF), symptom scores, and rescue salbutamol use. In addition, lung function tests were performed at each clinic visit. Safety assessments included monitoring of adverse events and morning serum cortisol concentrations. The primary efficacy parameter (mean morning PEF) increased during treatment in both groups; adjusted mean changes were 33 and 28 L/min for the combination and concurrent therapies, respectively. The 90% confidence interval for the difference in mean morning PEF between treatment groups was within the +15 L/min criterion for clinical equivalence. Similarly, there were improvements in pulmonary function, symptom score, and rescue salbutamol use during treatment in both groups, with no significant differences between the combination and concurrent therapy groups for any of these secondary efficacy parameters. Both treatment regimens were well-tolerated and had comparable adverse event profiles. Mean morning serum cortisol levels increased similarly in both groups during the study. In conclusion, salmeterol and fluticasone propionate therapy given as a new combination product is as safe and effective in children with asthma as the same drugs given concurrently via separate inhalers.

Effect of one year treatment with inhaled fluticasone propionate or beclomethasone dipropionate on bone density and bone metabolism: a randomised parallel group study in adult asthmatic subjects

BACKGROUND

There is some concern that prolonged treatment with high doses of inhaled corticosteroids may have a detrimental effect on bone mass. The aim of this one year study was to investigate the effects of low and high doses of fluticasone propionate (FP) (400 microg/day and 750 microg/day) and beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) (800 microg/day and 1500 microg/day) on bone mass and metabolism.

METHODS

This was a multicentre, double blind, parallel group study involving 69 mild to moderate asthmatic subjects who were randomised to treatment as follows: 22 to FP400, 21 to BDP800, 13 to FP750, and 13 to BDP1500. Their mean age was 39 years, 67% were men, and all the women were premenopausal.

RESULTS

The results of peripheral quantitative computed tomographic (pQCT) measurements (primary variable) showed that, compared with baseline values, there was no loss of trabecular or integral (cortical and trabecular) bone in the distal radius or tibia in any of the patients over the 12 month study period. No consistent pattern emerged from the analysis of changes from baseline in markers of bone formation and resorption after six and 12 months of treatment.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study provide reassuring prospective one year data showing that inhaled corticosteroids, in the range of doses used, had no adverse effects on bone mass and metabolism in this group of asthmatic patients.

Efficacy and safety of a novel beclomethasone dipropionate dry powder inhaler (Clickhaler) for the treatment of adult asthma. Amsterdam Clinical Study Group

A randomized, double-blind, double-dummy protocol was used to compare the safety and efficacy of beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) delivered by a novel dry powder inhaler (DPI, Clickhaler) or by a pressurized metered-dose inhaler (MDI) plus spacer. There was a four-week run-in period, completed by 240 adult patients, who received BDP via an MDI. Patients with stable asthma were then randomized into a 12-week treatment period and received BDP (< or =2 mg/day via DPI or MDI). There were no significant differences in morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) (primary endpoint), evening PEF, overall daytime or nighttime symptom scores, or lung function parameters (forced expiratory volume in 1 sec, forced vital capacity) between DPI and MDI. The safety profiles were similar and patient acceptability for Clickhaler was high. In conclusion, BDP administered via Clickhaler was found to be clinically equivalent to an optimally used MDI. Patients with stable asthma currently receiving BDP via MDI may be effectively switched to treatment via Clickhaler DPI.

Once-daily inhaled corticosteroids in mild to moderate asthma: improving acceptance of treatment

Despite the established efficacy of inhaled corticosteroids in improving lung function in asthma, there has not been a corresponding improvement in morbidity and mortality associated with the disease, which, in part, may result from non-compliance with the prescribed regimen. The reasons for this are many and varied, but an important measure in improving the level of compliance in asthma patients is simplification of the treatment regimen, which may be achieved by reducing the dose frequency and improving the ease of administration. In clinical trials designed to determine whether a reduction in dose frequency to once daily is associated with similar efficacy to that with more frequent administration, a number of studies have shown that once-daily administration of inhaled corticosteroids in both adults and children is as effective in controlling asthma as twice-daily administration of the same dosage, both when given as initial therapy in corticosteroid-naïve patients and in patients already receiving an inhaled corticosteroid. The drug for which most evidence to support a dosage change from twice-daily to once-daily therapy currently exists is budesonide, though limited evidence with other inhaled corticosteroids such as beclomethasone dipropionate, fluticasone propionate and flunisolide also supports once-daily use. Despite the larger single dosage with once-daily budesonide therapy, there has been no evidence in clinical trials of a greater incidence of local adverse effects such as hoarseness, throat irritation or oropharyngeal candidosis, and no evidence of adrenal suppression or growth retardation. Since compliance is an important factor that can affect the success or failure of asthma therapy, a reduction in the frequency of administration to once daily offers the potential advantage of improved compliance with treatment and hence better control of asthma. In the short term clinical trials conducted to date, patient preferences have favoured the once-daily regimen over twice-daily administration. When combined with other (e.g. educational) measures to improve patient compliance, a switch from twice-daily (or more frequent) administration to once-daily inhaled corticosteroid therapy seems likely to be beneficial in improving the long term outcome of treatment.

An improved method for the determination of fluticasone propionate in human plasma

Therapeutic monitoring of the potent, highly lipophilic glucocorticoid, fluticasone propionate (FP), was initially performed by a radioimmunoassay method. However an improved method with a lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) of at least 25 pg per ml (pg/ml(-1)) was needed to measure the low levels of FP present in human plasma following inhalation administration of doses in the range 50-250 microg twice daily. A sensitive and specific liquid chromatographic, tandem mass spectrometric method (LC-MS/MS) with automated solid phase extraction (SPE) was developed and validated. Fluticasone propionate was extracted from plasma using Bond Elut C18 cartridges and analysed using reverse-phase chromatography with atmospheric pressure chemical ionisation followed by selective reaction monitoring. The method used a 13C-labelled internal standard and was validated over a concentration range of 25-500 pg/ml(-1). The method was shown to be specific, sensitive and reliable in the analysis of clinical samples. The main advantages of this method over the radioimmunoassay method previously used were improved sensitivity, specificity, ease of sample preparation and shortened analysis time.

Oral steroid-sparing effect of two doses of nebulized fluticasone propionate and placebo in patients with severe chronic asthma

Inhaled steroids, delivered by metered dose aerosol and dry powder inhalers, have proved effective in reducing the need for oral steroids in patients with oral steroid-dependant asthma. This randomized, double-blind study, compared the efficacy and tolerability of nebulized fluticasone propionate (FP Nebules), 2 mg b.d. (FP 4 mg) and 0.5 mg b.d. (FP 1 mg) with placebo, on the reduction of oral steroid requirement in 301 adult patients with oral steroid-dependent asthma. Primary efficacy was assessed by the reduction in daily oral steroid dose. Secondary efficacy parameters included daily diary card peak expiratory flow (PEF), day and night-time symptoms and clinic lung function measurements. Safety was assessed by adverse event monitoring and serum cortisol levels. After 12 weeks of treatment the adjusted mean +/- SEM reduction in oral prednisolone was significantly greater in the FP 4 mg group (4.44 +/- 0.98 mg day-1) compared with FP 1 mg (2.16 +/- 1.00 mg day-1, P = 0.039) and placebo (1.20 +/- 1.02 mg day-1, P = 0.004). A higher percentage of patients discontinued the use of oral steroids with FP 4 mg (37%) compared with FP 1 mg (26%, P = 0.038) and placebo (18%, P < 0.001). Following treatment, the adjusted mean morning PEF showed a trend in favour of FP 4 mg (280 +/- 41 min-1) compared with placebo (270 +/- 51 min-1, P = 0.053) and the evening PEF was significantly higher with FP 4 mg (305 +/- 41 min-1) compared with FP 1 mg (292 +/- 41 min-1, P = 0.010). FP 4 mg resulted in a significantly higher percentage of days when the patients were free from daytime (P = 0.036) and night-time (P = 0.021) wheeze, compared with placebo. Significantly fewer patients withdrew from the FP 4 mg group compared with the other two groups (vs. FP 1 mg, P = 0.003; vs. placebo, P = 0.032). All three treatments were well tolerated and the incidence of adverse events was similar between the groups. FP Nebules at a daily dose of between 1 and 4 mg are a safe and effective means of reducing the oral steroid requirement of patients with chronic oral steroid dependent asthma.

Comparison of the effects of fluticasone propionate, aqueous nasal spray and levocabastine on inflammatory cells in nasal lavage and clinical activity during the pollen season in seasonal rhinitics

BACKGROUND

Treatment options for allergic rhinitis include antihistamines, decongestants, anticholinergics, cromolyn sodium and corticosteroids. As the nose is a small organ, comprising less than 1% of total body mass and surface area, it seems logical to confine treatment of rhinitis to the diseased organ.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effects of therapy with intranasal fluticasone propionate (FP), both on subjective symptoms and pathophysiological mechanisms, in rhinitis patients during pollen season when the patients were symptomatic.

METHODS

We used a double-blind, placebo (PLA)-controlled, randomized, double dummy, parallel group study of the effect of 6 weeks treatment. The double-blind comparison was made between the following three treatments: FP aqueous nasal spray, 200 microg taken once daily, levocabastine (LEV) nasal spray, 200 microg taken twice daily and PLA nasal spray. Clinical evaluation and the levels of cells and mediators in nasal washing were performed before and after treatments. Twenty-four patients (11 men and 13 women, aged 17-50 years, mean age 30.1 +/- 8.5) with strictly seasonal allergic rhinitis to Parietaria entered the study. Clinical evaluation and the levels of inflammatory cells (eosinophils and activated eosinophils, i.e. EG2+) and their mediators (tryptase, eosinophil cationic protein, eosinophil protein X and neutrophil myeloperoxidase) in nasal-lavage were performed before and after treatments.

RESULTS

Treatment with FP significantly increased, with respect to placebo, the percentage of days without sneezing (P < 0. 001), nasal blockage (P < 0.001), rhinorrhea (P < 0.001), nasal itching (P < 0.001). Furthermore, treatment with FP showed additional benefits with respect to LEV. The percentage of days without nasal blockage was significantly higher in the FP group that in the placebo group (P = 0.018). The same applied to rhinorrhea (P = 0.009). The percentages of days without sneezing and itching were instead not significantly different between the two groups. As expected, no significant differences were observed in baseline medians of the rhinitis symptom scores as well as in mean values of all mediators and eosinophils in nasal lavages of the various groups under study. After treatment the mean of subjective symptoms as well as all values in nasal lavage level fell significantly only in the FP group, whereas no significant changes were observed either in LEV or PLA groups. Accordingly, significant differences were observed at the end of the treatments between the values of fluticasone group vs LEV and PLA group values. Significant correlations between these values and symptom scores were found, according with literature data suggesting a pathogenetic role for these mediators and eosinophils in rhinitis.

CONCLUSION

FP (200 microg once daily) affords a significant degree of improvement in rhinitis control during pollen season, as measured by subjective and objective parameters, compared with LEV (200 microg twice daily) and PLA. The therapeutic benefits of intranasal FP are reflected in, and may be caused by, the decrease in nasal inflammatory cells.

Adrenal suppression secondary to inhaled fluticasone propionate

BACKGROUND

Inhaled glucocorticoids are the medical treatment of choice in many of patients with asthma. Fluticasone propionate is an inhaled glucocorticoid with little systemic bioavailability via the oral route and infrequent association with systemic adverse effects at the recommended dosage.

OBJECTIVE

To report a case of adrenal suppression and exogenous glucocorticoid excess from inhaled fluticasone propionate.

METHODS

A 9-year-old girl with a previous history of episodic asthma was placed on 550 microg of fluticasone propionate daily for severe labile asthma diagnosed by history and methacholine challenge. The patient returned 6 months later with complaints of increased appetite, nausea, and feeling "hot and flushed." On physical exam she had stigmata of Cushing's syndrome. The patient subsequently developed orthostatic hypotension and moderate dehydration following a viral illness. After a long taper of fluticasone propionate the patient' s adrenal function returned to normal and she had no acute or chronic exacerbations of her asthma.

RESULTS

Her 8 AM cortisol was undetectable with an ACTH of 21 pg/mL. The serum prolactin, TSH, free thyroxine, insulin-like growth factor I, and renin activity were all normal. An MRI study of her head was also normal. Repeat methacholine challenges while receiving a much smaller dose fluticasone propionate showed a significant decrease in airway reactivity.

CONCLUSION

Adrenal suppression can occur from inhaled fluticasone propionate at a dosage less than has been previously reported.

The management of moderate to severe atopic dermatitis in adults with topical fluticasone propionate. The Netherlands Adult Atopic DermatitisStudy Group

This study was designed to investigate a long-term therapeutic strategy for the management of recurring atopic dermatitis (AD) in adults using fluticasone propionate (FP) ointment (CutivateTM) whereby FP could help to prevent a relapse of AD once symptoms were under control. Adult patients with chronic, moderate to severe AD entered this multicentre study. All patients were initially treated with FP 0.005% (g/g) ointment in two different regimens. Patients whose AD had been completely healed by these treatments then entered a long-term treatment phase applying FP or placebo ointment once daily, two times per week for 16 weeks to 'known' healed lesions. By the end of the initial treatment period, mean SCORAD values had significantly (P < 0.0005) improved from baseline. Patients who entered the maintenance phase and were treated with intermittent FP for up to 16 weeks, demonstrated its superior efficacy (P = 0.018) over placebo, maintaining the improvements achieved after the initial treatment phase, reducing risk of relapse and delaying time to relapse (P = 0.013). No significant changes were detected in either treatment group in serum cortisol levels or in skin thickness measurements. Intermittent FP applied two times per week maintained a significant level of control, and delayed relapse of AD by comparison with placebo.

Salmeterol/fluticasone propionate combination

Current evidence suggests that addition of the long-acting beta2-agonist salmeterol to an inhaled corticosteroid in patients with persistent asthma symptoms provides greater clinical benefit than doubling the dosage of the inhaled corticosteroid. Fixed combination salmeterol/fluticasone propionate in 3 different fluticasone propionate dosage strengths administered via the Diskus powder inhaler does not result in any untoward interaction that affects the pharmacodynamic or pharmacokinetic profiles of the individual drugs, or their adverse effect profiles - including the influence of the corticosteroid on plasma cortisol levels. Administration of fixed combination salmeterol/ fluticasone propionate to both adults and children with persistent asthma provides greater improvements in lung function than either agent alone, and at least equal effectiveness to the same dosages of the 2 agents given by separate powder inhalers. Preliminary reports indicate that combination therapy has also demonstrated superior efficacy to budesonide (fluticasone propionate dosages were 25% those of budesonide). The most commonly encountered adverse effects in clinical trials with combined salmeterol/fluticasone propionate therapy have been oropharyngeal candidiasis. hoarseness/dysphonia, throat irritation, headache, tachycardia/palpitations, tremor and dizziness (all in < or =5% of patients).

Airway inflammation in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with special emphasis on the antigen-presenting dendritic cell: influence of treatment with fluticasone propionate

Asthma is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the airways characterized by variable airflow limitation and airway hyperresponsiveness. The type of inflammatory response in asthma is compatible with a major contribution of professional antigen-presenting cells. The airways in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are also markedly inflamed; however, the predominant types of inflammatory cells and the main anatomical site of the lesion appear to differ from those in asthma. COPD is characterized by reduced maximum expiratory flow and slow forced emptying of the lungs. Steroids are the most prominent medication used in the treatment of asthma and COPD; however, the beneficial effect of steroid treatment in COPD is subject of debate. We investigated the efficacy of fluticasone propionate (FP) treatment in atopic asthmatics and in COPD patients with bronchial hyperreactivity who smoke. The effect of the treatment on bronchial hyperreactivity and indices of the methacholine dose-response curve were analysed, as well as indices of inflammation of the airway mucosa with special emphasis on the antigen presenting dendritic cell. Treatment of allergic asthmatic patients resulted in improvement of lung function (FEV1), a decrease in bronchial hyperresponsiveness and a decrease of maximal airway narrowing. During the FP-treatment of COPD patients, FEV1 remained stable, while FEV1 deteriorated significantly in the placebo group. Therefore, steroid treatment may have a beneficial effect in COPD patients with bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR). Since immunohistochemical analysis of bronchial biopsy specimens from asthma and COPD patients show disease-specific aspects of inflammation, the anti-inflammatory effect of FP is obtained through modulation of different cell populations in asthma and COPD.

Time to onset of effect of fluticasone propionate in patients with asthma

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness of inhaled glucocorticoids in the treatment of asthma is well documented; however, times to onset and maximal treatment effects of these agents have been poorly described.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine the time to onset of effect and the time to the best observed effect of inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP) in patients with asthma.

METHODS

Data from 8 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials of at least 8 weeks' duration were analyzed. Corticosteroid-naive patients (n = 1461) were treated with either FP (25 micrograms to 500 micrograms) or placebo twice daily. Efficacy evaluations included morning peak expiratory flow (PEF), asthma symptom scores, supplemental albuterol use, and FEV1.

RESULTS

Statistically significant improvements in PEF, asthma symptom scores, and supplemental albuterol use were observed beginning on day 1 of treatment in the FP group versus the placebo group (P <.001); significant increases in FEV1 were observed at the first measurement at week 1 (P <.001). The best observed effect occurred within 3 weeks of the start of FP treatment for PEF (+36 L/min) and FEV1 (+0.52 L) and within 2 weeks for reduction in supplemental albuterol use and asthma symptom scores. Patients with the most severe airflow obstruction had the greatest change in PEF (+56 L/min) and fastest time to 50% of best observed effect (3 days) compared with patients with mild or moderate airflow obstruction; however, time to best observed effect was similar in the 3 groups (20 to 27 days).

CONCLUSION

In patients with asthma, the onset of significant benefit of FP on PEF, symptoms, and rescue albuterol use occurred within 1 day of the start of therapy. FEV1 improved within 1 week of the start of therapy (the first measurement after randomization). There was no effect of sex, age, or dose of FP on the time to response. The best observed response in PEF varies with the degree of baseline airflow obstruction; however, the degree of airflow obstruction has no effect on the time to best observed response.

Inhaled fluticasone propionate: a review of its therapeutic efficacy at dosages < or = 500 microg/day in adults and adolescents with mild to moderate asthma

Fluticasone propionate is a corticosteroid with comparatively high receptor affinity and topical activity. Inhaled fluticasone propionate < or =500 microg/day provided effective corticosteroid maintenance treatment in patients with mild to moderate asthma in randomised, controlled clinical studies of 4 to 24 weeks in duration. Dosages of 50 to 250 microg twice daily produced consistent improvement in spirometric measures of lung function, reduced the frequency of as-needed beta2-agonist bronchodilator use, asthma symptom scores and night-time wakenings, and prevented asthma exacerbations compared with placebo. Fluticasone propionate < or =250 microg twice daily provided significantly greater improvements in lung function than nedocromil 4 mg 4 times daily, theophylline (5 to 15 mg/L) or zafirlukast 20 mg twice daily. Health-related quality of life improved significantly with fluticasone propionate 88 microg twice daily, but not zafirlukast 20 mg twice daily or placebo. In comparative trials in which fluticasone propionate was given at half the dosage of beclomethasone dipropionate, budesonide or flunisolide, fluticasone propionate < or =250 microg twice daily produced equivalent or greater improvement in spirometric parameters and equivalent reductions in the use of as-needed beta2-agonists than beclomethasone dipropionate, budesonide or flunisolide. Fluticasone propionate 250 microg twice daily was generally more effective than triamcinolone acetonide 200 microg 4 times daily in two 24-week trials. The combination of inhaled fluticasone propionate < or =250 plus salmeterol < or =50 microg twice daily allowed for the use of lower dosages of the inhaled corticosteroid. The incidence of adverse events in patients receiving inhaled fluticasone propionate 50 to 250 microg twice daily was similar to that in beclomethasone dipropionate 168 to 500 microg twice daily and budesonide 100 to 600 microg twice daily recipients and greater than that in recipients of triamcinolone acetonide 200 microg 4 times daily in comparative trials. The incidence of oral candidiasis was < or =8% in patients treated with fluticasone propionate < or =250 microg twice daily or other agents. There was no evidence of clinically significant hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis suppression with fluticasone propionate < or =250 microg twice daily in comparative trials.

CONCLUSIONS

Inhaled fluticasone propionate < or =500 microg/day is an effective antiinflammatory therapy for mild to moderate asthma in adolescents and adults. The drug is more effective than nedocromil, theophylline or zafirlukast and is at least as effective as other inhaled corticosteroids administered at twice the fluticasone propionate dosage. The addition of inhaled salmeterol allows the use of lower maintenance dosages of fluticasone propionate. The drug is well tolerated and there is no evidence of a clinically significant effect of this dosage on HPA axis function. Hence, fluticasone propionate < or =500 microg/day is a particularly suitable agent for patients with mild to moderate asthma.

Inhaled corticosteroids for adult asthma: impact of formulation and delivery device on relative pharmacokinetics, efficacy and safety

Metered dose inhalers (MDIs) are the mainstay of inhaled steroid therapy for asthma. With the phasing out of traditional chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) propellants and their replacement with a new generation of CFC-free products, it is becoming clear that formulation and inhaler characteristics can markedly affect the drug delivery. It now seems necessary to compare inhalers not only on the basis of the properties of the steroid molecules but also to take into account the effect of propellants and other inhaler characteristics. The impact of formulation and delivery device on relative pharmacokinetics, therapeutic efficacy and tolerability is illustrated by a new preparation of beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) in an inhaler containing hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) propellant, called Qvar (3M Health Care, U.K.). This drug preparation delivers the majority of particles (60%) in the fine particle range. This appears to be associated with improved lung deposition, a halving of dose requirements of BDP, but no evidence of clinically relevant adrenal suppression when used in therapeutic doses. Prescribers need to be aware of the impact of formulation on pharmacokinetics of inhaled steroids in order to offer the lowest effective dose and give clear instructions to patients who are changing to a CFC-free product.