Omeprazole. An update of its pharmacology and therapeutic use in acid-related disorders

Morphine use induces gastric microbial dysbiosis driving gastric inflammation through TLR2 signalling which is attenuated by proton pump inhibition

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Opioids are the standard drug for pain management; however, their effects on gastric dysfunction are relatively understudied. Opioid users have a higher incidence of gastric pathology leading to increased hospitalization. Herein, we investigated the consequences of morphine use on gastric pathology and the underlying mechanisms. We further investigated the therapeutic benefit of proton pump inhibition to overcome morphine-mediated gastric inflammation.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

Mice were implanted with 25 mg slow-release morphine and placebo pellets. Gastric microbiome analyses were performed. Gastric damage was assayed. Gastric pH was measured. Germ-free and TLR2KO mice were used to investigate the mechanisms. Gastroprotective studies were performed with the proton pump inhibitor (PPI) omeprazole.

KEY RESULTS

Chronic morphine treatment alters gastric microbial composition and induces preferential expansion of pathogenic bacterial communities such as Streptococcus and Pseudomonas. Morphine causes disruption of the gastric mucosal layer, increases apoptosis, and elevates inflammatory cytokines. Moreover, morphine-mediated gastric pathology was significantly attenuated in germ-free mice, and reconstitution of morphine gastric microbiome in germ-free mice resulted gastric inflammation. In addition, morphine-mediated gastric inflammation was attenuated in TLR2KO mice. Morphine causes a decrease in gastric pH, which contributes to gastric dysbiosis leads to gastric inflammation. Omeprazole treatment inhibits gastric acidity, rescuing morphine-induced gastric dysbiosis and preventing inflammation.

CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS

This study attributes morphine-induced gastric acidity as a driver of gastric dysbiosis and pathology and proposes the therapeutic use of PPI as an inexpensive approach for the clinical management of morphine-associated pathophysiology.

Opioid Use in Murine Model Results in Severe Gastric Pathology that May Be Attenuated by Proton Pump Inhibition

Opioids are the gold standard for chronic and acute pain management; however, their consequence on gastric function is relatively understudied. Opioid users have a higher incidence of gastric dysfunction, worse quality of life, increased hospitalizations, and increased use of antiemetic and pain modulator medications. The current study shows that morphine treatment in the murine model results in greater disruption of gastric epithelial cell morphology, increased gastric cell apoptosis, elevated inflammatory cytokines, and matrix metallopeptidase-9 secretion. Morphine treatment also increases gastric acid secretion and causes delays in gastric emptying. Moreover, morphine treatment causes an increase in systemic IL-6 level, which plays an important role in morphine-induced delayed gastric emptying and gastric damage. IL-6 knockout mice show a significant level of reduction in morphine-induced gastric delaying, acid retention, and gastric damage. Thus, morphine-mediated gastric damage is a consequence of the accumulation of acid in the stomach due to increased gastric acid secretion and delayed gastric emptying. Treatment with a proton pump inhibitor resulted in a significant reduction in morphine-induced gastric inflammation, gastric delaying, and improved morphine tolerance. Hence, these studies attribute morphine-mediated induction in gastric acidity and inflammatory cytokines as drivers for morphine-associated gastric pathology and show the therapeutic use of proton pump inhibitors as an inexpensive approach for clinical management of morphine-associated pathophysiology and analgesic tolerance.

Omeprazole inhibits α-glucosidase activity and the formation of nonenzymatic glycation products: Activity and mechanism

In this study, the inhibitory effect and mechanism of omeprazole on α-glucosidase and nonenzymatic glycation were investigated in vitro by using multi-spectroscopic methods and molecular docking. Enzyme kinetic results showed that omeprazole inhibited α-glucosidase in a reversible and noncompetitive manner (IC₅₀= 0.595 ± 0.003 mM). The results from fluorescence quenching and thermomechanical analyses signified that omeprazole reduced the fluorescence intensity of α-glucosidase by forming an omeprazole-α-glucosidase complex primarily driven by hydrogen bonds. Molecular docking further confirmed that hydrogen bonds and hydrophobic forces were the major driving forces for omeprazole binding to α-glucosidase. The nonenzymatic glycation assays revealed that omeprazole had a moderate inhibition against the formation of fructosamine, dicarbonyl compounds, and advanced glycation end products (AGEs). This study provides a new inhibitor of both α-glucosidase and nonenzymatic glycation and provides a practicable candidate for treating diabetes and its complications.

Gut Microbiota Composition Before and After Use of Proton Pump Inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Recently, problems associated with proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use have begun to surface. PPIs influence the gut microbiota; therefore, PPI use may increase the risk of enteric infections and cause bacterial translocation. In this study, we investigated fecal microbiota composition, fecal organic acid concentrations and pH, and gut bacteria in the blood of the same patients before and after PPI use.

METHODS

Twenty patients with reflux esophagitis based on endoscopic examination received 8 weeks of treatment with PPIs. To analyze fecal microbiota composition and gut bacteria in blood and organic acid concentrations, 16S and 23S rRNA-targeted quantitative RT-PCR and high-performance liquid chromatography were conducted.

RESULTS

Lactobacillus species were significantly increased at both 4 and 8 weeks after PPI treatment compared with bacterial counts before treatment (P = 0.011 and P = 0.002, respectively). Among Lactobacillus spp., counts of the L. gasseri subgroup, L. fermentum, the L. reuteri subgroup, and the L. ruminis subgroup were significantly increased at 4 and 8 weeks after treatment compared with counts before treatment. Streptococcus species were also significantly increased at 4 and 8 weeks after PPI treatment compared with counts before treatment (P < 0.01 and P < 0.001, respectively). There was no significant difference in the total organic acid concentrations before and after PPI treatment. Detection rates of bacteria in blood before and after PPI treatment were 22 and 28%, respectively, with no significant differences.

CONCLUSIONS

Our quantitative RT-PCR results showed that gut dysbiosis was caused by PPI use, corroborating previous results obtained by metagenomic analysis.

Dementia, cognitive impairment and proton pump inhibitor therapy: A systematic review

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are among the most widely used medications worldwide. Dementia is an increasingly common cause of disability in older populations. Recent studies have suggested an increased risk of cognitive impairment and dementia diagnosis among people who consume PPIs. This systematic review explores dementia, cognitive impairment, and the use of PPIs.

METHODS

Systematic searches were conducted in the databases of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PSYCinfo, Scopus, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov for articles published from inception to June 30, 2016. Primary outcomes of interest were the use of PPIs and diagnosis of dementia or acute cognitive impairment. Studies conducted on people aged less than 18 years old were excluded. All study designs were eligible for inclusion. Two reviewers independently assessed study quality and extracted data from included studies.

RESULTS

The systematic search strategy and screening process yielded 11 studies for inclusion in the systematic review. Four studies explored PPI use and dementia, and seven studies explored PPI use and acute cognitive impairment. Three of the four studies exploring dementia identified a positive association with PPI use. A positive association was also observed in the majority of studies exploring acute cognitive impairment.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the current published literature, this systematic review has identified that the reported association between PPI use and dementia is limited by methodological issues and conflicting results. Further longitudinal studies with robust bias limitation are required to explore the use of PPIs and dementia or acute cognitive impairment, and to ascertain the existence of any causal relationships.

In Vitro Functional Characterisation of Cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C19 Allelic Variants CYP2C19*23 and CYP2C19*24

Cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C19 is essential for the metabolism of clinically used drugs including omeprazole, proguanil, and S-mephenytoin. This hepatic enzyme exhibits genetic polymorphism with inter-individual variability in catalytic activity. This study aimed to characterise the functional consequences of CYP2C19*23 (271 G>C, 991 A>G) and CYP2C19*24 (991 A>G, 1004 G>A) in vitro. Mutations in CYP2C19 cDNA were introduced by site-directed mutagenesis, and the CYP2C19 wild type (WT) as well as variants proteins were subsequently expressed using Escherichia coli cells. Catalytic activities of CYP2C19 WT and those of variants were determined by high performance liquid chromatography-based essay employing S-mephenytoin and omeprazole as probe substrates. Results showed that the level of S-mephenytoin 4'-hydroxylation activity of CYP2C19*23 (V _max 111.5 ± 16.0 pmol/min/mg, K _m 158.3 ± 88.0 μM) protein relative to CYP2C19 WT (V _max 101.6 + 12.4 pmol/min/mg, K _m 123.0 ± 19.2 μM) protein had no significant difference. In contrast, the K _m of CYP2C19*24 (270.1 ± 57.2 μM) increased significantly as compared to CYP2C19 WT (123.0 ± 19.2 μM) and V _max of CYP2C19*24 (23.6 ± 2.6 pmol/min/mg) protein was significantly lower than that of the WT protein (101.6 ± 12.4 pmol/min/mg). In vitro intrinsic clearance (CL_int = V _max/K _m) for CYP2C19*23 protein was 85.4 % of that of CYP2C19 WT protein. The corresponding CL_int value for CYP2C19*24 protein reduced to 11.0 % of that of WT protein. These findings suggested that catalytic activity of CYP2C19 was not affected by the corresponding amino acid substitutions in CYP2C19*23 protein; and the reverse was true for CYP2C19*24 protein. When omeprazole was employed as the substrate, K _m of CYP2C19*23 (1911 ± 244.73 μM) was at least 100 times higher than that of CYP2C19 WT (18.37 ± 1.64 μM) and V _max of CYP2C19*23 (3.87 ± 0.74 pmol/min/mg) dropped to 13.4 % of the CYP2C19 WT (28.84 ± 0.61 pmol/min/mg) level. Derived from V _max/K _m, the CL_int value of CYP2C19 WT was 785 folds of CYP2C19*23. K _m and V _max values could not be determined for CYP2C19*24 due to its low catalytic activity towards omeprazole 5'-hydroxylation. Therefore, both CYP2C19*23 and CYP2C19*24 showed marked reduced activities of metabolising omeprazole to 5-hydroxyomeprazole. Hence, carriers of CYP2C19*23 and CYP2C19*24 allele are potentially poor metabolisers of CYP2C19-mediated substrates.

Proton pump inhibitors alter the composition of the gut microbiota

OBJECTIVE

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are drugs used to suppress gastric acid production and treat GI disorders such as peptic ulcers and gastro-oesophageal reflux. They have been considered low risk, have been widely adopted, and are often over-prescribed. Recent studies have identified an increased risk of enteric and other infections with their use. Small studies have identified possible associations between PPI use and GI microbiota, but this has yet to be carried out on a large population-based cohort.

DESIGN

We investigated the association between PPI usage and the gut microbiome using 16S ribosomal RNA amplification from faecal samples of 1827 healthy twins, replicating results within unpublished data from an interventional study.

RESULTS

We identified a significantly lower abundance in gut commensals and lower microbial diversity in PPI users, with an associated significant increase in the abundance of oral and upper GI tract commensals. In particular, significant increases were observed in Streptococcaceae. These associations were replicated in an independent interventional study and in a paired analysis between 70 monozygotic twin pairs who were discordant for PPI use. We propose that the observed changes result from the removal of the low pH barrier between upper GI tract bacteria and the lower gut.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings describe a significant impact of PPIs on the gut microbiome and should caution over-use of PPIs, and warrant further investigation into the mechanisms and their clinical consequences.

Proton pump inhibitor-related headaches: A nationwide population-based case-crossover study in Taiwan

Background

Headaches resulting from proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use could cause discontinuation of PPI in as many as 40% of patients who experience such headaches. Previous studies focusing on acute headache risk from PPI use are rare and limited to clinical trials of a single PPI.

Objectives

To investigate the association between PPI use and headache with a nationwide population-based case-crossover study.

Methods

Records containing the first diagnosis of any headache, including migraine and tension-type headaches, were retrieved from Taiwan National Health Insurance Database (1998–2010). We compared the rates of PPI use for cases and controls during time windows of 7, 14, and 28 days. The adjusted self-matched odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) from a conditional logistic regression model were used to determine the association between PPI use and headache.

Results

Overall, 314,210 patients with an initial diagnosis of any headache during the study period were enrolled. The adjusted ORs for headache risk after PPI exposure were calculated for three time periods (within 7 days = 1.41, p = 0.002, 95% CI 1.14–1.74; within 14 days = 1.36, p < 0.001, 95% CI 1.16–1.59; within 28 days = 1.20, p = 0.002, 95% CI 1.07–1.35). Subgroup analyses showed female patients had an increased risk of headache. Among PPIs, lansoprazole and esomeprazole had the highest risks of headache incidence, which were similar to that of nitrates.

Conclusion

PPI usage is associated with an increased risk for acute headache. Female patients and use of lansoprazole or esomeprazole present the greatest risks of headache.

[Safety and interactions of proton pump inhibitors: lessons learned in millions of patients]

After many years of widespread use, proton pump inhibitors (PPI) have been demonstrated to be relatively safe. The most frequently associated adverse reactions are mild with scarce clinical effects. These agents produce hypergastrinemia but this adverse effect has not been related to the development of malignancies. PPI seem to facilitate certain bacterial infections in the gastrointestinal and respiratory tracts. However, these infections are easily treated and therefore do not limit the prescription of PPI. From the pharmacokinetic point of view, the possibility of interactions with other drugs metabolized by the cytochrome P450 system has been described but these interactions generally seem to have little clinical or therapeutic importance. However, regulatory agencies are currently stressing the hypothetical interaction between PPI (especially omeprazole) and clopidogrel, which reduces the latter's antiplatelet effect. Although this recommendation should be followed, this interaction should be specifically evaluated to determine its clinical effect and the possible alternatives in patients at risk of gastrointestinal bleeding. Lastly, the present article reviews PPI administration in special, currently debated situations, such as in pregnant or breastfeeding women.

Proton pump inhibitors and rebound acid hypersecretion

Rebound acid hypersecretion is defined as an increase in gastric acid secretion above pre-treatment levels after cessation of antisecretory therapy. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) have been proved to be more effective than histamine-2 receptor antagonists in suppressing intragastric acidity and have therefore become the main choice for management of acid-related complaints. Recent studies have shown that PPI therapy-elicited rebound acid hypersecretion could in turn induce acid-related symptoms. This makes it difficult for patients to cease PPI therapy. Hypergastrinemia is an important mechanism that leads to rebound acid hypersecretion. To reduce the occurrence of rebound acid hypersecretion, efforts should be made to restrict indications for using PPIs.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease

GERD is a common chronic gastrointestinal disorder, and its prevalence in Asia is increasing. Classical symptoms of heartburn and regurgitation are common presentations. There is no standard criterion for the diagnosis of GERD, and 24-h pH monitoring lacks sensitivity in NERD. Furthermore, diagnostic studies for gastroesophageal reflux disease have several limitations. A short course of PPI is often used in clinical practice as a diagnostic test for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Elderly patients with GERD usually present with atypical manifestations, and they tend to develop more severe disease. PPI remains the mainstay of treatment for GERD. In a subset of patients who wish to discontinue maintenance treatment, anti-reflux surgery is a therapeutic option.

Review: treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease in the elderly

The prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) increases with age; older patients are more likely to develop severe disease. Common symptoms of GERD in the elderly include dysphagia, vomiting, and respiratory problems. Older patients are more likely to require aggressive therapy, and usually their management is compounded by the presence of comorbidities and consumption of various medications. Proton pump inhibitors are the mainstay of GERD treatment in the elderly because of their profound and consistent acid suppressive effect. Overall, proton pump inhibitors seem to be safe for both short- and long-term therapy in elderly patients with GERD. Antireflux surgery may be safe and effective in a subset of elderly patients with GERD.

Safety of the long-term use of proton pump inhibitors

The proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) as a class are remarkably safe and effective for persons with peptic ulcer disorders. Serious adverse events are extremely rare for PPIs, with case reports of interstitial nephritis with omeprazole, hepatitis with omeprazole and lansoprazole, and disputed visual disturbances with pantoprazole and omeprazole. PPI use is associated with the development of fundic gland polyps (FGP); stopping PPIs is associated with regression of FGP. In the absence of Helicobacter pylori infection, the long-term use of PPIs has not been convincingly proven to cause or be associated with the progression of pre-existing chronic gastritis or gastric atrophy or intestinal metaplasia. Mild/modest hypergastrinemia is a physiological response to the reduction in gastric acid secretion due to any cause. The long-term use of PPIs has not been convincingly proven to cause enterochromaffin-like cell hyperplasia or carcinoid tumors. PPIs increase the risk of community acquired pneumonia, but not of hospital acquired (nosocomial) pneumonia. There is no data to support particular care in prescribing PPI therapy due to concerns about risk of hip fracture with the long-term use of PPIs. Long-term use of PPIs does not lead to vitamin B12 deficiencies, except possibly in the elderly, or in persons with Zollinger-Ellison Syndrome who are on high doses of PPI for prolonged periods of time. There is no convincingly proven data that PPIs increase the risk of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea in persons in the community. The discontinuation of PPIs may result in rebound symptoms requiring further and even continuous PPI use for suppression of symptoms. As with all medications, the key is to use PPIs only when clearly indicated, and to reassess continued use so that long-term therapy is used judiciously. Thus, in summary, the PPIs are a safe class of medications to use long-term in persons in whom there is a clear need for the maintenance of extensive acid inhibition.

Transmucosal gastric leak induced by proton pump inhibitors

Despite their remarkable safety profile and lack of clinical side effects, proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) induce a transmucosal gastric leak to non-electrolyte probes of various sizes. The ex vivo addition of PPIs to isolated rat gastric corpus increases transmucosal permeability in a dose-dependent manner, which corresponds with PPIs' dose-dependent inhibition of acid secretion. Upon the addition of omeprazole, lansoprazole, or esomeprazole, a small decrease in transepithelial resistance and the concomitant stimulation of short circuit current was observed. Additionally, transepithelial flux of (14)C-[D]-mannitol (MW 182.17) across the gastric mucosa increased by a mean of 68% immediately following the addition of 200 microM omeprazole. This flux increase was bidirectional. Omeprazole also increased the paracellular permeability to larger radiolabeled probes, including (14)C-sucrose (MW 342.3) and (14)C-polyethylene glycol (MW 4,000) by 118% and 350%, respectively. However, the flux of still larger probes, 10,000 and 70,000 MW dextrans, was not increased. Because PPIs are so widely used and are assumed to be innocuous, this transmucosal gastric leak must be further investigated, as it may carry considerable biomedical implications.

Rapid determination of omeprazole in human plasma by protein precipitation and liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry

A rapid, sensitive and reliable method was developed to quantitate omeprazole in human plasma using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. The assay is based on protein precipitation with acetonitrile and reversed-phase liquid chromatography performed on an octadecylsilica column (55 mm x 2mm, 3 microm particles), the mobile phase consisted of methanol-10 mM ammonium acetate (60:40, v/v). Omeprazole and flunitrazepam, the internal standard, elute at 0.80+/-0.10 min with a total run time 1.35 min. Quantification was through positive ion mode and selected reaction monitoring mode at m/z 346.1-->197.9 for omeprazole and m/z 314.0-->268.0 for flunitrazepam, respectively. The lower limit of quantitation was 1.2 ng/ml using 0.25 ml of plasma and linearity was observed from 1.2 to 1200 ng/ml. Within-day and between-day precision expressed by relative standard deviation was less than 5% and inaccuracy did not exceed 12%. The assay was applied to the analysis of samples from a pharmacokinetic study.

[Safety of proton pump inhibitors]

The significant inhibitory capacity of gastric acid secretion of PPIs makes them the drugs of choice for treating acid-related diseases. The considerable prevalence of these diseases and the need for maintaining the administration of the drug during considerably long periods results in this therapeutic group being one of the most widely used. However, in spite of their extensive use, there continue to emerge concerns about their potential toxicity; concerns surrounding the specificity of their mechanism of action and a consequential suspicion that something so potent must involve harmful effects. PPIs act selectively on the final stage of the process of gastric acid secretion, namely the H+/K+-ATPase or proton pump. This enzyme represents an essential step in the process of secretion of H+, and PPIs exert a very specific action on the parietal cell, as they need an environment with very low pH levels, which only exist in this cell. In the present article, the adverse effects of PPIs are reviewed, with special emphasis on those related to their continued administration and on the special circumstances of patients, as in the case of the elderly, those with liver failure, pregnant and breastfeeding mothers and children. All the PPIs on the market share a common chemical basis and there are no great differences in their potential adverse effects, the possibility of them promoting opportunist infections or their capacity to generate pharmacokinetic interactions with other drugs, which, if occur, are generally insignificant. After two decades of use, PPIs have proved to be very effective and safe drugs.

Effect of cimetidine and phenobarbital on metabolite kinetics of omeprazole in rats

Omeprazole (OMP) is a proton pump inhibitor used as an oral treatment for acid-related gastrointestinal disorders. In the liver, it is primarily metabolized by cytochrome P-450 (CYP450) isoenzymes such as CYP2C19 and CYP3A4. 5-Hyroxyomeprazole (5-OHOMP) and omeprazole sulfone (OMP-SFN) are the two major metabolites of OMP in human. Cimetidine (CMT) inhibits the breakdown of drugs metabolized by CYP450 and reduces the clearance of coadministered drug resulted from both the CMT binding to CYP450 and the decreased hepatic blood flow due to CMT. Phenobarbital (PB) induces drug metabolism in laboratory animals and human. PB induction mainly involves mammalian CYP forms in gene families 2B and 3A. PB has been widely used as a prototype inducer for biochemical investigations of drug metabolism and the enzymes catalyzing this metabolism, as well as for genetic, pharmacological, and toxicological investigations. In order to investigate the influence of CMT and PB on the metabolite kinetics of OMP, we intravenously administered OMP (30 mg/kg) to rats intraperitoneally pretreated with normal saline (5 mL/kg), CMT (100 mg/kg) or PB (75 mg/kg) once a day for four days, and compared the pharmacokinetic parameters of OMP. The systemic clearance (CLt) of OMP was significantly (p<0.05) decreased in CMT-pretreated rats and significantly (p<0.05) increased in PB-pretreated rats. These results indicate that CMT inhibits the OMP metabolism due to both decreased hepatic blood flow and inhibited enzyme activity of CYP2C19 and 3A4 and that PB increases the OMP metabolism due to stimulation of the liver blood flow and/or bile flow, due not to induction of the enzyme activity of CYP3A4.

Effects of D-002, a product isolated from beeswax, on gastric symptoms of patients with osteoarthritis treated with piroxicam: a pilot study

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are indicated for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis, but often induce gastric adverse experiences (AE), including gastric ulcers and complications. Inhibitors of proton pump and H(2) antagonists are very effective for duodenal ulcer; meanwhile, cytoprotective drugs are more effective for gastric ulcer. D-002 is a mixture of higher aliphatic alcohols obtained from beeswax, wherein triacontanol is the most abundant. D-002 induces anti-ulcer effects through a cytoprotective mechanism, being more effective in protecting against ethanol- and NSAID-induced ulcers. The present double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical study was undertaken to investigate the effects of D-002 on gastric symptoms associated to piroxicam use on patients suffering osteoarthritis. Fifty-nine patients, all taking piroxicam, 20 mg/day, were randomized to placebo or D-002 (40 or 100 mg/day) for 14 days. The primary efficacy variable was the reduction on the frequency of patients with gastric AE compared with placebo. Pain evolution was investigated to discard any influence on D-002 on the analgesic effect of piroxicam. The frequency of patients treated with D-002, 40 and 100 mg/day, reporting acidity [0 of 18 (0%) and 1 of 21 (4.8%), respectively] was lower (P < .05) than in placebo [6 of 20 (30%)]. Also, the frequency of patients treated with 100 mg/day reporting some gastric AE [5 of 21 (23.8%)] was lower (P < .05) than in placebo [13 of 20 (65.0%)]. The analgesic effect of piroxicam was unaffected with D-002. Treatment was well tolerated. Two patients discontinued from the study because of gastrointestinal AE: one in the placebo group and the other treated with D-002, 40 mg/day. Other three patients discontinued because of other AE: mildly uncontrolled hypertension (one in the placebo group, one treated with D-002, 40 mg/day) and headache (one treated with D-200, 100 mg/day). It is concluded that D-002 could be useful for controlling gastric AE of patients treated with NSAIDs, although further studies with a larger sample size and longer follow-up are needed for definitive conclusions.

Prevalence of non-Helicobacter pylori duodenal ulcer in Karachi, Pakistan

AIM: To determine the prevalence of non-Helicobacter pylori (H pylori)-related duodenal ulcer in patients with acid-peptic diseases.

METHODS: Medical records of patients who attended the Gastroenterology Department at Aga Khan University Hospital from 1999 to 2001 and had endoscopic diagnosis of duodenal ulcers were reviewed. Duodenal ulcer associated with H pylori was diagnosed on the basis of endoscopy, rapid urease test and histopathology whereas histories of aspirin or other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) related duodenal ulcers. Non-H pylori, non-NSAID duodenal ulcers were those without H pylori infection and history of NSAID intake. Co-morbid conditions associated were noted.

RESULTS: Of 2260 patients, 10% (217/2 260) had duodenal ulcer. Duodenal ulcer related to H pylori infection accounted for 53% (116/217), NSAID-related 10% (22/217), non-H pylori non-NSAID 29% (62/217), and 8% (17/217) had both H pylori infection and histories of NSAID intake. Fifteen percent (18/116) patients had past histories of peptic ulcer disease in H pylori infection, while 8% (5/62) in non-H pylori non-NSAID ulcer. Co-morbid conditions in H pylori infection were seen in 23% (27/116) and 34% (21/62) in non-H pylori non-NSAID ulcer.

CONCLUSION: Incidence of H pylori infection related with duodenal ulcer is common. In the presence of co-morbids, non-H pylori and non-NSAID duodenal ulcer is likely to be present.

Systematic review and meta-analysis: is 1-week proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapy sufficient to heal peptic ulcer?

AIMS

To systematically review the efficacy on ulcer healing of 1-week combination of a proton pump inhibitor plus two antibiotics and to perform a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials to evaluate whether 7 days of proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapy is sufficient to heal peptic ulcer.

METHODS

Studies where 1-week proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapy was administered to heal peptic ulcer were included. Randomized clinical trials comparing the efficacy on ulcer healing of 7-day proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapy versus this same regimen but prolonging the proton pump inhibitor for several more weeks were included in the meta-analysis. Electronic and manual bibliographical searches were conducted. Meta-analysis was performed combining the odds ratios of the individual studies.

RESULTS

Twenty-four studies (2342 patients) assessed ulcer healing with 1-week proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapy. Mean healing rate was 86%, and 95% in Helicobacter pylori-eradicated patients. Six studies (862 patients), were included in the meta-analysis. Mean ulcer healing rate with a 7-day treatment was 91% versus 92% when proton pump inhibitor was prolonged for 2-4 more weeks (odds ratio = 1.11; 95% confidence interval = 0.71-1.74).

CONCLUSION

In patients with peptic ulcer and H. pylori infection, prolonging therapy with proton pump inhibitor after a triple therapy for 7 days with a proton pump inhibitor and two antibiotics is not necessary to induce ulcer healing.

Variable omeprazole kinetics in healthy Jordanian adults

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to examine the pharmacokinetics of orally administered omeprazole in healthy adult Jordanian men.

METHOD

Plasma concentrations of omeprazole were measured over a 12 h period after administration of a single oral dose of 40 mg omeprazole (Losec), AstraZeneca, UK). Subjects were healthy adult Jordanian men age 18-38 (24 +/- 4, mean +/- SD). The pharmacokinetic parameters were derived from the plasma concentration-time profiles for AUC(0-t), AUC(0-inf), C(max), t(max), t(1/2e) and K(e).

RESULTS

The pharmacokinetic of omeprazole were scattered over a wide range. The median AUC(0-inf) was 784.86 +/- 1182.88 (ng.h/ml), and the median C(max) was 521 +/- 354 (ng/ml) (median +/- SD). In general, most subjects showed normal distribution (approximately 90%). Some subjects (10%) did show very high AUC and C(max) compared with the reported AUC and C(max) levels. These subjects had higher half-lives and lower rates of elimination.

CONCLUSION

Significant difference in the pharmacokinetics of omeprazole after a single dose administration was noted. Approximately 10% of the study group showed very high omeprazole plasma levels and AUCs. Differences in the pharmacokinetics might be due to differences in the genetic make-up of subjects.

A Pharmacological Approach to Gastric Acid Inhibition

Proton pump inhibitors have changed our approach to gastric acid-related diseases. They are much more potent acid inhibitors than H2-antagonists and exhibit a sophisticated mechanism of action. The present review analyses the general pharmacology of proton pump inhibitors and differentiates the specific characteristics of the various compounds that belong to this family. Special emphasis has been placed in describing the clinical implications of such differences and the potential importance for adverse effects.

Lack of effect of omeprazole or of an aluminium hydroxide/magnesium hydroxide antacid on the pharmacokinetics of lumiracoxib

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effects of multiple doses of omeprazole and of a single dose of an aluminium hydroxide/magnesium hydroxide (Al/Mg) antacid on the single-dose plasma pharmacokinetics of lumiracoxib.

STUDY DESIGN

Open-label, randomised, three-period, crossover study.

POPULATION STUDIED

Healthy subjects aged 18-65 years.

METHODS

Fourteen subjects who met eligibility criteria were each administered three treatments in random order: (A) lumiracoxib 400 mg as a single oral dose; (B) oral omeprazole 20 mg once daily for 4 consecutive days, then lumiracoxib 400 mg as a single oral dose just prior to oral omeprazole 20 mg on day 5; and (C) lumiracoxib 400 mg as a single oral dose immediately prior to a 20 mL dose of Al/Mg antacid (magnesium hydroxide 800 mg and aluminium hydroxide 900 mg). The interval between each lumiracoxib dose was 7 days. Analysis of variance was performed to determine whether lumiracoxib alone differed from lumiracoxib plus omeprazole or from lumiracoxib plus Al/Mg antacid for overall exposure (area under the concentration-time curve from zero to infinity [AUC( infinity )]) and peak concentration (C(max)), with treatment sequence, subject, period and treatment as factors. Ratios of geometric means between lumiracoxib plus omeprazole and lumiracoxib plus Al/Mg antacid to lumiracoxib alone (reference) were calculated for AUC( infinity ) and C(max). If the mean ratios, with 90% CIs, fell within the interval 0.80-1.25, the treatments were considered equivalent.

RESULTS

Arithmetic mean plasma lumiracoxib concentration-time profiles were similar for all treatments, with a rapid rise in concentration after administration, reaching C(max) values (mean +/- SD) of 9.24 +/- 1.96, 8.81 +/- 2.30, and 10.43 +/- 3.24 mg/L within 2-3 hours for treatments A, B and C, respectively. AUC( infinity ) was similar for the three treatments (36.75 +/- 7.73, 34.88 +/- 8.40 and 35.50 +/- 5.72 mg. h/L). All ratios of geometric means with 90% CIs fell within the interval used for establishing bioequivalence, except for the C(max) comparison between lumiracoxib plus Al/Mg antacid and lumiracoxib alone, which was 1.11 (0.95, 1.31).

CONCLUSIONS

Coadministration of lumiracoxib with omeprazole or with an Al/Mg antacid had no clinically significant effect on lumiracoxib single-dose plasma pharmacokinetics. Lumiracoxib can, therefore, be administered concurrently with either of these agents without need for lumiracoxib dosage alteration.

Treatment of acid-related diseases in the elderly with emphasis on the use of proton pump inhibitors

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) have revolutionised the treatment of acid-related disorders, and they have also made it possible to define the spectrum of acid inhibition required for optimal treatment in each disorder. Five PPIs are now available: the older drugs, omeprazole, lansoprazole and pantoprazole, and the two newest, rabeprazole and esomeprazole. These agents have predominantly been developed in the younger adult population, and data for the elderly population are limited. Subtle differences have emerged between the old and the new PPIs in their pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and efficacy profiles. The degree of clinical relevance of these differences in the adult population is in question. However, according to this review, based on the available data for the elderly and by inference from the adult population, the differences are highly relevant in the elderly population. Studies of the pharmacokinetics of older PPIs demonstrated considerable variation in drug clearance that was reflected in a wide range of efficacy related to acid suppression with standard dosages. The newer PPIs offer several advantages over older agents, particularly in terms of rapid, profound and consistent acid inhibition. Consistent acid inhibition is particularly important in the elderly since clinical response is often difficult to judge in this patient group. An individual's cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C19 genotype predicts the degree of acid suppression and consequently the clinical efficacy of the PPIs. The older PPIs are predominantly metabolised by CYP2C19, with this being of more importance for omeprazole and lansoprazole than pantoprazole. The hepatic metabolism of rabeprazole is predominantly by nonenzymatic reactions and minimally by CYP-mediated reactions, which therefore confers an advantage over older PPIs in that genetic polymorphisms for CYP2C19 do not significantly influence rabeprazole clearance, clinical efficacy or potential for drug interactions. The metabolism of esomeprazole involves CYP2C19 but to a lesser extent than its predecessor omeprazole. Furthermore, esomeprazole has a more rapid onset of action and less variation in clearance rates than omeprazole. Drug clearance decreases with age independently of CYP2C19 status, exaggerating some of the differences between the PPIs and increasing the risk of drug interactions.

A randomized comparative study to determine the effect of omeprazole on the peak serum concentration of itraconazole oral solution

To determine the effect of omeprazole on peak serum concentrations (C(max)) of itraconazole oral solution (IOS), we carried out a randomized, open-label, prospective, crossover study. Fifteen healthy, non-pregnant adults received a single dose of IOS 400 mg on two occasions, at least 7 days apart, with omeprazole 40 mg nightly for 7 days before either IOS dose 1 or 2. C(max), time to C(max) (T(max)) and AUC(0-8) were determined for itraconazole and its active metabolite, hydroxyitraconazole, for each dose and compared. Omeprazole did not significantly affect the C(max), T(max) or AUC(0-8) of itraconazole or hydroxyitraconazole when administered as IOS.

Characteristics of diarrhoea in 10,008 users of lansoprazole in daily practice: which co-factors contribute?

PURPOSE

Diarrhoea is one of the most frequently reported adverse events during proton pump inhibitor use in any setting. Because of the limited available information, this study was set up with the aim of assessing the incidence and characteristics of diarrhoea and to investigate possible associated co-factors in proton pump inhibitor users in daily practice.

METHODS

Data were used from a prospective, observational study in which 10,008 lansprazole users were followed over time (1994-1998). The study was designed according to the SAMM guidelines. A nested case-control design was used to compare proton pump inhibitor users reporting diarrhoea with those reporting no diarrhoea.

RESULTS

The frequency of diarrhoea was 3.7% and the incidence density 10.7 per 1000 patients months of proton pump inhibitor use. The diarrhoea was most commonly loose and occurred on average 4.4 times per day. The analysis of co-factors revealed that patients with concomitant use of oral antibiotics and patients reporting neurological and/or dermatological adverse events, were at risk of developing diarrhoea during proton pomp inhibitor use.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, diarrhoea was as frequently reported in our study as in clinical trials and observational data of lansoprazole users. We found the concomitant use of oral antibiotics and the reporting of certain other adverse events to be associated with the reporting of diarrhoea during lansoprazole use. Although a relationship with the proton pump inhibitor intake seemed very plausible, we recommend that use of concomitant medicines as a cause of diarrhoea must be taken into consideration in lansoprazole users.

Determinants of headache in lansoprazole users in The Netherlands: results from a nested case-control study

OBJECTIVE

During proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use, in clinical trials, headache is one of the most frequently reported adverse events (frequency 1.3 to 8.8%), while results of one observational study indicate that headache is the fifth most frequently reported adverse event (incidence densities 2.5 to 4.6 per 1000 patient-months of exposure). However, there are no observational studies performed regarding the occurrence and features of headache during use of PPIs in daily practice. For this reason this study was set up with the aim to assess the incidence and characteristics of headache and to investigate possible associated co-factors in PPI users in daily practice.

DESIGN

Data were used from a prospective, observational study in which 10 008 lansoprazole users were followed over time. The study was designed according to the Safety Assessment of Marketed Medicines guidelines. A nested case-control design was used to compare PPI users reporting headache or not.

RESULTS

The frequency of headache was 2.5% in users of lansoprazole and the incidence density was 7.2 per 1000 patient-months of PPI lansoprazole use. Two-thirds of patients with headache had tension headache and one-third had migraine. The analysis of co-factors revealed that women, patients with previous use of analgesics and patients reporting several adverse events, were at risk to develop headache during PPI use. Patients with headache also, significantly more often, reported diarrhoea, nausea and dizziness. A discontinuation of PPI therapy resulted in a cessation or reduction of the headache in 80.0% (20 of 25).

CONCLUSIONS

As can be expected, headache was reported less frequently in this study compared with clinical trials with lansoprazole. The incidence density was comparable with other observational data of lansoprazole and omeprazole users. Besides several commonly accepted co-factors such as female gender and a history of analgesic use, we also found the reporting of other adverse events to be associated with the reporting of headache during lansoprazole use. The cessation of headache after a discontinuation of use of the PPI and the observed dose relationship suggested that headache was indeed an adverse effect of lansoprazole use.

[Pharmacological study on the pathological changes of the gastric mucosa in Helicobacter pylori-infected Mongolian gerbils]

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection has been recognized to be a causal factor of gastritis, ulcers and gastric cancer in man. Using Mongolian gerbils (M. gerbils), which are suitable for an H. pylori infection animal model, we examined 1) how H. pylori infection, indomethacin and their combination affects the healing of gastric ulcers and whether or not such factors provoke a relapse of healed acetic acid ulcers; and 2) whether or not eradication of the bacteria with drugs at specified times after infection prevents the development of mucosal changes, including gastric adenocarcinoma. 1) H. pylori infection significantly delayed ulcer healing 4 weeks following infection. Indomethacin treatment showed a tendency to delay ulcer healing. Ulcer healing in H. pylori-infected M. gerbils was significantly delayed by indomethacin. H. pylori infection resulted in a relapse of healed ulcers from 1 to 6 months after infection, with a gradual increase in size. Omeprazole markedly prevented the ulcer relapse caused by H. pylori infection. 2) Four or 8 months after H. pylori inoculation, eradication was performed by concurrent treatment with omeprazole + clarithromycin. Immediately after treatment ended in both the 5 and 9 month groups, it was verified that H. pylori were completely eradicated. Autopsy performed 18 months after H. pylori inoculation revealed gastric hyperplastic polyps with erosive lesions and ulcers that were grossly visible; and atrophic gastritis, intestinal metaplasia, carcinoids, and adenocarcinomas were histologically observed in the non-treated control group. In animals eradicated after 4 months and autopsied after 18 months, however, such mucosal changes were not observed. In contrast, intestinal metaplasia and mucosal atrophy was observed in animals eradicated after 8 months and autopsied after 18 months. It was concluded that 1) H. pylori infection delayed the healing of preexisting gastric ulcers and resulted in the relapse of healed ulcers, yet indomethacin had little or no effect on ulcer healing or relapse; and 2) early eradication of H. pylori infection with drug therapy can prevent severe gastric mucosal changes, to include adenocarcinomas, in M gerbils.

Pharmacological and pharmacodynamic essentials of H(2)-receptor antagonists and proton pump inhibitors for the practising physician

The suppression of gastric acid secretion with anti-secretory agents has been the mainstay of medical treatment for patients with acid-related disorders. Although the majority of Helicobacter pylori -related peptic ulcers can be healed with antibiotics, ulcer healing and symptom control can be significantly improved when antibiotics are given with anti-secretory agents, especially with a proton pump inhibitor. There is a dynamic relationship between the suppression of intragastric acidity and the healing of peptic ulcer and erosive oesophagitis and control of acid-related symptoms. The suppression of gastric acid secretion achieved with H(2)-receptor antagonists has, however, proved to be suboptimal for effectively controlling acid-related disorders, especially for healing erosive oesophagitis and for the relief of reflux symptoms. H(2)-receptor antagonists are also not effective in inhibiting meal-stimulated acid secretion, which is required for managing patients with erosive oesophagitis. Furthermore, the rapid development of tolerance to H(2)-receptor antagonists and the rebound acid hypersecretion after the withdrawal of an H(2)-receptor antagonist further limit their clinical use. Although low-dose H(2)-receptor antagonists are currently available as over-the-counter medications for self-controlling acid-related symptoms, their pharmacology and pharmacodynamics have not been well studied, especially in the self-medicating population. Proton pump inhibitors have been proved to be very effective for suppressing intragastric acidity to all known stimuli, although variations exist in the rapidity of onset of action and the potency of acid inhibition after oral administration at the approved therapeutic doses, which may have important clinical implications for the treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and perhaps for eradicating H. pylori infection when a proton pump inhibitor is given with antibiotics. Once-daily dosing in the morning is more effective than dosing in the evening for all proton pump inhibitors with respect to the suppression of intragastric acidity and daytime gastric acid secretion in particular, which may result from a better bio-availability being achieved with the morning dose. When higher doses are needed, these drugs must be given twice daily to achieve the optimal suppression of 24 hour intragastric acidity. Preliminary results have shown that esomeprazole, the optical isomer of omeprazole, given at 40 mg, is significantly more effective than omeprazole 40 mg, lansoprazole 30 mg or pantoprazole 40 mg for suppressing gastric acid secretion. However, more studies in different patient populations are needed to compare esomeprazole with the existing proton pump inhibitors with regard to their efficacy, cost-effectiveness and long-term safety for the management of acid-related disorders.

Omeprazole and CYP2C19 polymorphism: effects of long-term treatment on gastrin, pepsinogen I, and chromogranin A in patients with acid related disorders

BACKGROUND

The polymorphic enzyme CYP2C19 is of importance for the metabolism and effects of omeprazole during short-term treatment.

AIM

To investigate the relationship between CYP2C19 genotype and the effects of long-term omeprazole treatment.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 180 patients with acid related disorders were genotyped for wild type and mutated CYP2C19 alleles by allele-specific PCR amplification. Gastrin and chromogranin A were assessed by radioimmunoassays, and pepsinogen I and H. pylori serology were assessed by ELISA methods.

RESULTS

In 108 of the patients, who received a single dose of 20 mg omeprazole, there was no difference in gastrin and chromogranin A concentrations between the three CYP2C19 genotypes. In 72 patients on long-term treatment (> 1 year) with 20 mg omeprazole daily, serum gastrin as well as plasma chromogranin A concentrations (mean +/- s.e.) were both about threefold higher in the wild type/mutated (52.1 +/- 7.6 pM and 7.3 +/- 1.3 nM (n=19), respectively) compared to wild type/wild type (14. 7 +/- 0.9 pM and 2.5 +/- 0.1 nM (n=52), respectively; both comparisons P=0.0001). In a single mutated/mutated patient on long-term treatment, both gastrin and chromogranin A were high (88 pM and 13.7 nM, respectively). Serum pepsinogen I concentration was significantly lower in wild type/mutated (n=19) patients on long-term treatment, compared with the corresponding wild type/wild type (n=49) group (147 +/- 19 microg/L vs. 193 +/- 12 microg/L, P=0. 04).

CONCLUSION

Patients with one (and probably also with two) mutated CYP2C19 allele(s) on long-term treatment with omeprazole had significantly affected serum gastrin and pepsinogen I and plasma chromogranin A concentrations compared with patients with two normal alleles. This indicates that changes in gastric mucosal morphology during omeprazole treatment might be dependent upon the degree of the individual's capacity to metabolize omeprazole.

Esomeprazole improves healing and symptom resolution as compared with omeprazole in reflux oesophagitis patients: a randomized controlled trial. The Esomeprazole Study Investigators

BACKGROUND

The pharmacologic profile of the new proton pump inhibitor esomeprazole has demonstrated advantages over omeprazole that suggest clinical benefits for patients with acid-related disease.

METHODS

1960 patients with endoscopy-confirmed reflux oesophagitis (RO) were randomized to once daily esomeprazole 40 mg (n=654) or 20 mg (n=656), or omeprazole 20 mg (n=650), the standard recommended dose for RO, for up to 8 weeks in a US, multicentre, double-blind trial. The primary efficacy variable was the proportion of patients healed at week 8. Secondary variables included healing and heartburn resolution at week 4, time to first resolution and sustained resolution of heartburn, and per cent of heartburn-free days and nights. Safety and tolerability were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Significantly more patients were healed at week 8 with esomeprazole 40 mg (94.1%) and 20 mg (89.9%) vs. omeprazole 20 mg (86.9%), using cumulative life table estimates, ITT analysis (each P < 0.05). Esomeprazole 40 mg was also significantly more effective than omeprazole for healing at week 4 and for all secondary variables evaluating heartburn resolution. The most common adverse events in all treatment groups were headache, abdominal pain and diarrhoea.

CONCLUSION

Esomeprazole was more effective than omeprazole in healing and symptom resolution in GERD patients with reflux oesophagitis, and had a tolerability profile comparable to that of omeprazole.

Review article: comparison of the pharmacokinetics, acid suppression and efficacy of proton pump inhibitors

Proton pump inhibitors have dramatically influenced the management of acid-peptic disorders in recent years. They all have a broadly similar mechanism of action and are extensively metabolized in the liver via cytochromes P450 2C19 and 3A4. There is some variation in their potential for drug interactions due to differences in enzyme inhibition. Relatively few serious adverse effects have been reported for the proton pump inhibitors. Comparative studies of acid suppression suggest that lansoprazole and pantoprazole have a potency similar to that of omeprazole on a mg for mg basis; however, rabeprazole may have a greater potency than omeprazole. Lansoprazole and rabeprazole display a more rapid onset of maximal acid suppression than the other proton pump inhibitors. Comparative studies using proton pump inhibitors for the treatment of reflux oesophagitis, duodenal ulcer healing and Helicobacter pylori eradication show little overall difference in outcome between the proton pump inhibitors when used in their standard doses. Lansoprazole and rabeprazole provide earlier and better symptom relief than the other proton pump inhibitors in some studies of peptic ulcer treatment. The few studies of gastric ulcer treatment suggest that there is an advantage in using the proton pump inhibitors that have a higher standard daily dose.

A placebo-controlled study to assess the effects of 7-day dosing with 10, 20 and 40 mg rabeprazole on 24-h intragastric acidity and plasma gastrin in healthy male subjects

AIM

To compare the effects of rabeprazole 10, 20 and 40 mg o.d. on 24-h intragastric acidity and plasma gastrin concentration in a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial.

METHODS

Twenty-four healthy male volunteers were studied on the 7th day of morning dosing with either placebo or rabeprazole 10, 20 or 40 mg in a crossover fashion. On day 7, hourly intragastric acidity was measured for 24 h from 08.00 hours by gastric aspiration. Plasma gastrin concentrations were also measured hourly from 08.00 to 24.00 hours, and 2-hourly thereafter.

RESULTS

Compared with placebo, rabeprazole 10, 20 and 40 mg produced significant dose-related decreases in intragastric acidity (median 24-h integrated acidity=697, 186, 129 and 82 mmol h/L, respectively). This was associated with significant elevation of plasma gastrin concentration (median 24-h integrated gastrin=141, 1184, 1484 and 1763 pmol.h/L, respectively). Rabeprazole 40 mg resulted in significantly decreased acidity compared with both 10 and 20 mg, and in longer times for which intragastric pH was maintained at > 3 (19. 2 h vs. 17.3 h and 17.5 h) and > 4 (17 h vs. 14.2 h and 15.2 h), but was accompanied by significantly increased plasma gastrin. There was a consistent trend for greater antisecretory activity for 20 mg compared with 10 mg, but these differences did not reach statistical significance. The interindividual variability in antisecretory response was greatest with 10 mg.

CONCLUSIONS

Rabeprazole 10, 20 and 40 mg produce significant, profound dose-related inhibition of gastric acid secretion. Taking into account reciprocal increases in plasma gastrin and the interindividual variation in antisecretory response, 20 mg appears to be the preferred dose for routine clinical use.

The efficacy of proton-pump inhibitors in acute ulcer bleeding: a qualitative review

Despite remarkable progress in the treatment of chronic peptic ulcer disease, acute gastroduodenal ulcer hemorrhage remains a therapeutic challenge. Numerous trials of H-2 receptor antagonists have not consistently shown a significant benefit in such patients. Proton-pump inhibitors, which more profoundly suppress gastric acid, are being increasingly evaluated. We have performed a qualitative systematic review to analyze the results of these trials to determine if a reasonable consensus can be reached. We searched for all published, randomized, controlled studies that evaluated proton-pump inhibitors in patients with acute peptic ulcer hemorrhage. The primary outcomes evaluated were: (A) persistent or recurrent bleeding; (B) need for surgery; and (C) mortality. Sixteen trials were evaluated, enrolling 3154 patients. Four of the sixteen studies showed a statistically significant decrease in overall rebleeding rate, and two described specific benefit in patients with Type IIa and IIb endoscopic stigmata. Four studies also showed a significantly decreased surgery rate, but none demonstrated a significant mortality reduction. Proton-pump inhibitors may improve outcome in acute peptic ulcer bleeding, but the available clinical data remain inconsistent. Further study is necessary to define the optimal dosage, route of administration, duration of therapy, and subsets of patients most likely to benefit.

Evaluation of omeprazole, lansoprazole, pantoprazole, and rabeprazole in the treatment of acid-related diseases

OBJECTIVE

To review the comparative efficacy and safety of the proton pump inhibitors (PPIs)--omeprazole, lansoprazole, pantoprazole, and rabeprazole--in the management of acid-related diseases.

DATA SOURCES

English-language journal articles retrieved from a MEDLINE search from 1990 to the present using these index terms: proton pump inhibitors, omeprazole, lansoprazole, pantoprazole, rebeprazole, and each of the acid-related diseases.

STUDY SELECTION

Clinical trials and pertinent review articles that discussed the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of PPIs in the management of acid-related disease.

DATA EXTRACTION

By the authors.

DATA SYNTHESIS

PPIs are substituted benzimidazoles that inhibit gastric acid secretion by covalently binding to the proton pump (H+/K+ ATPase). All undergo extensive hepatic metabolism and conjugation. The four agents differ in their metabolism by and effects on specific hepatic enzymes and thus in their ability to interact with other medications. PPIs are important agents used for eradicating Helicobacter pylori, in treating peptic ulcer disease, gastroesophageal reflux disease, Zollinger-Ellison syndrome, and upper gastrointestinal bleeding, and for preventing acid aspiration. Short-term side effects of the four agents are similar. The long-term safety of pantoprazole and rabeprazole appears similar to that of omeprazole and lansoprazole. Pantoprazole, which is in the final stages of approval for marketing in the United States, will be available in both an oral and injectable formulation.

CONCLUSION

Based on superior efficacy profiles, PPIs are the drugs of choice in managing patients with peptic ulcer disease, gastroesophageal reflux disease, and Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. The decision to select one PPI versus another is most likely to be based on the agents' acquisition costs, formulations, FDA-labeled indications, and overall safety profiles. Intravenous or parenteral pantoprazole may become the preferred antisecretory agent for patients unable to take oral medications (e.g., critically ill patients and those with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome).

Rabeprazole: a review of its use in acid-related gastrointestinal disorders

Rabeprazole is an inhibitor of the gastric proton pump. It causes dose-dependent inhibition of acid secretion and has a more rapid onset of action than omeprazole. Duodenal ulcers healed faster after treatment with rabeprazole 20 or 40 mg/day than placebo or ranitidine 150 mg 4 times daily and at a generally similar rate to omeprazole 20 mg/day in patients with duodenal ulcers; rabeprazole was similar or superior to these agents in relieving symptoms. Rabeprazole 20 and 40 mg/day healed gastric ulcers faster than placebo, and rabeprazole 20 mg/day healed ulcers at a similar healing rate, to omeprazole 20 mg/day in well controlled 6-week studies. Gastric ulcer symptom relief with rabeprazole was similar or superior to that provided by omeprazole or placebo. In 8-week studies in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD), rabeprazole 10, 20 and 40 mg/day were more effective than placebo, rabeprazole 20 mg/day was more effective than ranitidine 150 mg twice daily, and rabeprazole 20 mg/day was similar in efficacy to omeprazole 20 mg/day. Symptom relief with rabeprazole in 8-week trials in patients with GERD was superior to that provided by placebo, and similar to ranitidine or omeprazole. Rabeprazole was similar to omeprazole and superior to placebo in both maintenance of healing and prevention of symptoms in patients with healed GERD in 1-year studies. One-week triple therapy with rabeprazole 20 mg twice daily plus 2 antibacterial agents achieved > or = 90% Helicobacter pylori eradication, but, as would be expected, a regimen of rabeprazole 20 mg twice daily plus 1 antibacterial agent was less successful. The drug was as effective as omeprazole and lansoprazole as part of triple therapy for H. pylori eradication. Rabeprazole successfully reduced acid output to target levels and prevented further pathological changes in 10 patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. Usual dosages of rabeprazole are 20 mg/day for 4 weeks to treat duodenal ulcers, 6 weeks for gastric ulcers and 8 weeks for GERD, although some patients with duodenal ulcer may respond to a 10 mg/day dosage. For long term maintenance of GERD healing, 10 or 20 mg daily doses are adequate. Patients with hypersecretory states may need individualised dosages starting at 60 mg/day. The drug was well tolerated in clinical trials, with headache, rash, infection, diarrhoea and flu syndrome as the most common adverse events. In conclusion, rabeprazole appears to be a well tolerated proton pump inhibitor with a rapid onset of action and a low potential for drug interactions. The drug may be used to achieve healing and the relief of symptoms of duodenal ulcer, gastric ulcer and GERD, maintain GERD healing, and can form part of effective regimens to eradicate H. pylori.

A practical approach to patients with refractory Helicobacter pylori infection, or who are re-infected after standard therapy

The vast majority of recurrences of Helicobacter pylori infection after apparent eradication are observed during the first year. Almost all of these early recurrences are due to recrudescence rather than reinfection by a new strain. After the first year, the recurrence rates approximate to the rate of natural acquisition of H. pylori infection. By contrast, in developing countries, higher rates of recurrence suggest a major role of real reinfection. Important predictive factors of H. pylori treatment success are compliance and bacterial susceptibility to antibiotics. The new 1-week triple therapies, based on a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) and 2 antibiotics, lead to treatment discontinuation but rarely. If containing a nitroimidazole, their efficacy is reduced to 60 to 80% by pretreatment in vitro resistance. The prevalence of nitroimidazole resistance varies dependent on the geographical area, with rates over 50% in tropical regions. Resistance against macrolides hinders treatment success in 50 to 80% of patients. In the US, south-western Europe and Japan the prevalence of macrolide resistance amounts to about 10%, in other countries about 3%. After failed treatment, acquired resistance is frequent. Testing for resistance is recommended to facilitate the decision for an alternative triple therapy or for quadruple therapy comprising bismuth, metronidazole, tetracycline and a PPI. It seems reasonable to increase the dose of PPI in a retreatment regimen containing amoxicillin. Post-treatment double resistance against nitroimidazoles and macrolides reduces the success of most of the currently evaluated retreatment regimens. To overcome double resistance, high dose PPI plus amoxicillin is one approach, beside other experimental multidrug treatments.

Effect of CYP2C19 polymorphism on serum levels of vitamin B12 in patients on long-term omeprazole treatment

BACKGROUND

The S-mephenytoin hydroxylase is a polymorphic cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme, identified as CYP2C19, which catalyses the metabolism of omeprazole and some other drugs.

AIM

To determine whether long-term treatment with omeprazole affects serum vitamin B12 levels, and if so to what extent it depends on CYP2C19 activity.

METHODS

Serum vitamin B12 levels (pmol/L) were assessed in 179 patients. Genotyping for wild-type (wt) and mutated (mut) CYP2C19 alleles was performed by allele-specific PCR amplification.

RESULTS

One-hundred and eleven of the patients received one dose of 20 mg omeprazole. No difference in B12 levels were found between heterozygous (wt/mut) (n = 23) and homozygous (wt/wt) (n = 85) patients (mean +/- s.d., 350 +/- 82 vs. 315 +/- 87 pmol/L, respectively). Three patients were mut/mut, with serum vitamin B12 levels of 303 +/- 50 pmol/L. In the 68 patients on long-term (>1 year) therapy with 20 mg omeprazole daily, serum vitamin B12 levels were lower in the heterozygous (wt/mut) (n = 19) compared to homozygous wt/wt (n = 49) (246 +/- 71 vs. 305 +/- 98 pmol/L, P = 0. 01, respectively). In one patient (mut/mut) who was studied both after a single dose and after long-term (15 months) treatment with omeprazole, serum vitamin B12 decreased from 360 to 178 pmol/L. In the wt/mut, but not in the wt/wt group, serum vitamin B12 levels were significantly lower in patients on long-term therapy compared with those receiving one dose (246 +/- 71 vs. 350 +/- 82 pmol/L, P < 0.0001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

CYP2C19 polymorphism significantly affected serum vitamin B12 levels in patients on long-term therapy with omeprazole. In the future, genotyping of CYP2C19 may be useful for patients in need of long-term treatment with omeprazole or other proton pump inhibitors.

Comparison of rabeprazole 20 mg versus omeprazole 20 mg in the treatment of active duodenal ulcer: a European multicentre study

BACKGROUND

Rabeprazole sodium is the newest member of a class of substituted benzimidazole molecules known as proton pump inhibitors. Other proton pump inhibitors have been shown to be effective in healing active duodenal ulcer.

METHOD

This randomized, double-blind, multicentre study, conducted at 25 European sites, compared the efficacy and tolerability of rabeprazole and omeprazole in patients with active duodenal ulcers. One hundred and two patients with active duodenal ulcer received rabeprazole 20 mg and 103 patients omeprazole 20 mg once daily for 2 or 4 weeks, with ulcer healing monitored by endoscopy.

RESULTS

After 2 weeks, complete ulcer healing was documented in 69% of patients given rabeprazole 20 mg and in 62% of patients given omeprazole 20 mg (N.S.). After 4 weeks, healing rates were 98% in the rabeprazole group and 93% in the omeprazole group (P = 0.083). Rabeprazole-treated patients had significantly greater improvement in daytime pain symptom relief than those treated with omeprazole at the conclusion of the study (P = 0.038). Both drugs were well tolerated over the 4-week treatment period. Mean changes from baseline to end-point in fasting serum gastrin were significantly greater in the rabeprazole group, but at end-point mean values were well within normal limits for both groups. No clinically meaningful changes or other between-group differences were observed in laboratory parameters.

CONCLUSION

In this study, rabeprazole produced healing rates equivalent to omeprazole at weeks 2 and 4, and provided significantly greater improvement in daytime pain. Both treatments were well tolerated.

Double-blind comparison [correction of Double-blind, placebo-controlled comparison] of rabeprazole 20 mg vs. omeprazole 20 mg in the treatment of erosive or ulcerative gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. The European Rabeprazole Study Group

BACKGROUND

Rabeprazole sodium is the most recent member of a class of substituted benzimidazole molecules known as proton pump inhibitors. Other proton pump inhibitors have been shown to be effective in healing oesophagitis.

METHODS

In this randomised, double-blind, multicentre study, conducted at 27 European sites, the efficacy and safety of rabeprazole and omeprazole were compared in patients with erosive or ulcerative gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD).100 patients received rabeprazole 20 mg, and 102 patients omeprazole 20 mg once daily for 4 or 8 weeks, with healing monitored by endoscopy.

RESULTS

Overall GERD healing rates observed and evaluated at weeks 4 and 8 were equivalent. Four-week healing rates for rabeprazole and omeprazole were 81%-81% and 92%-94% for 8-week healing. Rabeprazole-treated patients had similar relief of the frequency and intensity of heartburn to those treated with omeprazole. Both drugs were well tolerated over the 8-week treatment period. Mean changes in fasting serum gastrin were comparable. No significant differences in laboratory parameters were seen. Biopsies for argyrophil ECL cell histology at the end-point revealed a similar distributions of hyperplasia grades to those at baseline in both groups. Biopsies of body and antral mucosa for other parameters were similar between treatments for Helicobacter pylori colonization, presence or degree of inflammation, atrophy or intestinal metaplasia at the end-point.

CONCLUSION

In this study, GERD healing rates following rabeprazole 20 mg once daily were equivalent to those obtained with omeprazole 20 mg once daily. Both treatments resulted in a comparable relief of the frequency and intensity of heartburn associated with this disease, and both were well tolerated.