Newer Treatment Options for Skin and Soft Tissue Infections

Antimicrobial cyclodextrin-assisted electrospun fibers loaded with carvacrol, citronellol and cinnamic acid for wound healing

This work aimed to explore an alternative to the use of antibiotics for prevention and treatment of wounds infection caused by two common bacterial pathogens Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. For this purpose, three different essential oil components (EOCs), namely carvacrol, citronellol and cinnamic acid, were loaded into electrospun fibers of poly-ε-caprolactone (PCL) aided by alpha-cyclodextrin (αCD) and hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin (HPβCD). Electrospun-fibers prepared with each EOC and their mixtures were screened for antimicrobial capability and characterized regarding morphological, mechanical, thermal, surface polarity, antibiofilm and antioxidant properties. αCD formed poly(pseudo)rotaxanes with PCL and weakly interacted with EOCs, while HPβCD facilitated EOC encapsulation and formation of homogeneous fibers (500-1000 nm diameter) without beads. PCL/HPβCD fibers with high concentration of EOCs (mainly carvacrol and cinnamic acid) showed strong antibiofilm (>3 log CFU reduction) and antioxidant activity (10-50% DPPH scavenging effects). Different performances were recorded for the EOCs and their mixtures; cinnamic acid migrated to fiber surface and was released faster. Fibers biocompatibility was verified using hemolysis tests and in ovo tissue integration and angiogenesis assays. Overall, HPβCD facilitates complete release of EOCs from the fibers to the aqueous medium, being an environment-friendly and cost-effective strategy for the treatment of infected wounds.

Synergy between conventional antibiotics and anti-biofilm peptides in a murine, sub-cutaneous abscess model caused by recalcitrant ESKAPE pathogens

With the antibiotic development pipeline running dry, many fear that we might soon run out of treatment options. High-density infections are particularly difficult to treat due to their adaptive multidrug-resistance and currently there are no therapies that adequately address this important issue. Here, a large-scale in vivo study was performed to enhance the activity of antibiotics to treat high-density infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. It was shown that synthetic peptides can be used in conjunction with the antibiotics ciprofloxacin, meropenem, erythromycin, gentamicin, and vancomycin to improve the treatment outcome of murine cutaneous abscesses caused by clinical hard-to-treat pathogens including all ESKAPE (Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterobacter cloacae) pathogens and Escherichia coli. Promisingly, combination treatment often showed synergistic effects that significantly reduced abscess sizes and/or improved clearance of bacterial isolates from the infection site, regardless of the antibiotic mode of action. In vitro data suggest that the mechanisms of peptide action in vivo include enhancement of antibiotic penetration and potential disruption of the stringent stress response.

Daptomycin Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics in Septic and Critically Ill Patients

Infections, including sepsis, are associated with high mortality rates in critically ill patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). Appropriate antibiotic selection and adequate dosing are important for improving patient outcomes. Daptomycin is bactericidal in bloodstream infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus and other Gram-positive pathogens cultured in ICU patients. The drug has concentration-dependent activity, and the area under the curve/minimum inhibitory concentration ratio is the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) index that best correlates with daptomycin activity, whereas toxicity correlates well with daptomycin plasma trough concentrations (or minimum concentration [C min]). Adequate daptomycin exposure can be difficult to achieve in ICU patients; multiple PK alterations can result in highly variable plasma concentrations, which are difficult to predict. For this reason, therapeutic drug monitoring could help clinicians optimize daptomycin dosing, thus improving efficacy while decreasing the likelihood of serious adverse events. This paper reviews the literature on daptomycin in ICU patients with sepsis, focusing on dosing and PK and PD parameters.

Decreased protein binding of moxifloxacin in patients with sepsis?

The mean (SD) unbound fraction of moxifloxacin in plasma from patients with severe sepsis or septic shock was determined by ultrafiltration to 85.5±3.0% (range 81.9 and 91.6%) indicating a decreased protein binding of moxifloxacin in this population compared with the value of 58-60% provided in the Summary of Product Characteristics. However, previous investigations neglected the influence of pH and temperature on the protein binding of moxifloxacin. Maintaining physiological conditions (pH 7.4, 37°C) - as in the present study - the unbound fraction of moxifloxacin in plasma from healthy volunteers was 84%. In contrast, the unbound fraction of moxifloxacin was 77% at 4°C and 66-68% in unbuffered plasma or at pH 8.5 in fair agreement with previously published data. PK/PD parameters e.g. fAUC/MIC or ratios between interstitial fluid and free plasma concentrations, which were obtained assuming a protein binding rate of moxifloxacin of 40% or more, should be revised.

Dalbavancin: A New Option for the Treatment of Gram-Positive Infections

Objective:

To review the pharmacology, microbiology, chemistry, in vitro susceptibility, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, safety, tolerability, dosage, and administration of dalbavancin, a new semisynthetic lipoglycopeptide.

Data Sources:

A MEDLINE search, restricted to the English language, was conducted from 1966 through January 2006. Supplementary sources included program abstracts from the Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, American Society of Microbiology, and the Infectious Diseases Society of America from 2000 to 2005 and information available from the manufacturer's Web site.

Study Selection and Data Extraction:

In vitro and preclinical studies, as well as Phase I, II, and III clinical trials, were evaluated to summarize the microbiology, pharmacology, clinical efficacy, and safety of dalbavancin. All published trials and abstracts citing dalbavancin were selected.

Data Synthesis:

Dalbavancin, a novel lipoglycopeptide, has a mechanism of action similar to that of other glycopeptides. It has in vitro activity against a variety of gram-positive organisms, but no activity against gram-negative or vancomycin-resistant enterococci that possess VanA gene. Due to its prolonged half-life (6–10 days), dalbavancin can be administered intravenously once weekly. In Phase II and III clinical trials, dalbavancin was effective and well tolerated for the treatment of skin and soft-tissue infections, catheter-related bloodstream infections, and skin and skin-structure infections. To date, adverse events are mild and limited; the most common include pyrexia, headache, nausea, oral candidiasis, diarrhea, and constipation.

Conclusions:

Dalbavancin appears to be a promising antimicrobial agent for the treatment of gram-positive infections. A new drug application was filed with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in December 2004. The FDA issued an approvable letter in 2005 for dalbavancin. If approved, dalbavancin is expected to be launched in the first quarter of 2006.

Clinical and Economic Consequences of Failure of Initial Antibiotic Therapy for Hospitalized Patients With Complicated Skin and Skin-Structure Infections

Objective.

To estimate the consequences of failure of initial antibiotic therapy for patients with complicated skin and skin-structure infections.

Design.

Retrospective cohort study.

Setting.

Large US multihospital database.

Patients.

We identified a total of 47,219 patients (age 18 years or older) who were admitted to the hospital for complicated skin and skin-structure infections from April 1, 2003, through March 31, 2004, and who received intravenous antibiotics during the first 2 hospital-days (ie, initial antibiotic therapy). Failure of therapy was defined as drainage, debridement, or receipt of other intravenous antibiotics at any subsequent time (except for changes to narrower-spectrum agents or any therapy change immediately before discharge). Predictors of failure of antibiotic therapy and mortality were examined using multivariate logistic regression. Analysis of covariance was used to estimate the impact of treatment failure on duration of intravenous antibiotic therapy, length of stay, and total inpatient charges.

Results.

For 10,782 admitted patients (22.8%), there was evidence of failure of initial antibiotic therapy. In multivariate analyses, treatment failure was associated with receipt of vasoactive medications during the first 2 hospital-days (odds ratio [OR], 1.66 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.19-2.31]), initiation of antibiotic therapy in the intensive care unit (OR, 1.53 [95% CI, 1.28-1.84]), and the patient's Charlson comorbidity index (OR per 1-point increase, 1.06 [95% CI, 1.04-1.08]); treatment failure was also was associated with a 3-fold increase in mortality (OR, 2.91 [95% CI, 2.34-3.62]). Compared with patients for whom initial treatment was successful, patients who experienced treatment failure received intravenous antibiotic therapy for a mean of 5.7 additional days, were hospitalized for a mean of 5.4 additional days, and incurred a mean of $5,285 (in 2003 dollars) in additional inpatient charges (all P <.01).

Conclusion.

Failure of initial antibiotic therapy in the treatment of complicated skin and skin-structure infections is associated with significantly worse clinical and economic outcomes.

Using daptomycin in hospitalised patients with cSSTI caused by Staphylococcus aureus has an impact on costs

BACKGROUND

The aim was to assess the cost impact of daptomycin compared to vancomycin treatment in patients hospitalised for complicated skin and soft-tissue infection (cSSTI) with suspected methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection in the UK.

METHODS

A decision model was developed to estimate the costs associated with cSSTI treatment. Data on efficacy, treatment duration and early discharge from published clinical trials were used, with data gaps on standard clinical practice being filled by means of clinician interviews.

RESULTS

Total health-care costs per patient were GBP 6,214 and GBP 6,491 for daptomycin and vancomycin, respectively. A sensitivity analysis suggested that modifying the parameters within a reasonable range does not impact on the conclusion that the higher cost of daptomycin is likely to be offset by lower costs of monitoring and hospitalisation.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that daptomycin not only provides an alternative treatment for multiple resistant infections, but may also reduce National Health Service costs.

The safety and efficacy of daptomycin versus other antibiotics for skin and soft-tissue infections: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

Daptomycin, a cyclic lipopeptide that exhibits rapid, concentration-dependent bactericidal activity in vitro against a broad spectrum of Gram-positive pathogens, has now, since 2003, been approved in more than 70 countries and regions to treat skin and soft-tissue infections (SSTIs). The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare the safety and efficacy of daptomycin with other antibiotics, especially with vancomycin which has long been considered the standard therapy for complicated SSTIs.

DESIGN

Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs).

DATA SOURCES

We thoroughly searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central to identify relevant RCTs. Six RCTs with a total of 1710 patients were included in this meta-analysis.

RESULTS

The results demonstrated that the efficacy of daptomycin was at par with or maybe better than other first-line antibiotics for treating SSTIs as shown by the OR for clinical success (OR=1.05, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.31, p=0.65, I(2)=0%); daptomycin versus vancomycin subgroup (OR=1.19, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.83, p=0.43, I(2)=0%); overall microbiological success (OR=1.05, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.79, p=0.86, I(2)=42%); microbiological success of daptomycin versus comparators for Staphylococcus aureus (SA, OR=1.05, 95% CI 0.61 to 2.60, p=0.53, I(2)=47%), for methicillin-resistant S. aureus (OR=0.90, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.06, p=0.20, I(2)=56%). However, daptomycin tended to have a similar treatment-related adverse events (AEs) incidence in comparison with other antibiotics (OR=1.06, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.59, p=0.76, I(2)=41%). The trend showed that daptomycin might cause less discontinuation due to AEs and death compared with other first-line antibiotics (OR=0.71, 95% CI 0.46 to 1.10, p=0.12, I(2)=11%). Significantly more patients in the daptomyicn group had creatine phosphokinase elevation than those in the control group; however, it could be reversed when the therapy ended (OR=1.95, 95% CI 1.04 to 3.65, p=0.04, I(2)=0).

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis demonstrated that the safety and efficacy of daptomycin was not inferior to that of other first-line drugs, and daptomycin tended to exhibit superior efficacy when compared with vancomycin or with comparators for SA infections; nevertheless, more high-quality RCTs are needed to draw a more credible conclusion.

Tigecycline: a novel glycylcycline antibiotic

Tigecycline, the first-in-class glycylcycline, was developed to recapture the broad spectrum of activity of the tetracycline class and to treat patients with difficult-to-treat bacterial infections. Tigecycline's in vitro spectrum of activity encompasses aerobic, facultative and anaerobic Gram-positive and -negative bacteria, including antimicrobial-resistant bacteria such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium, and extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Clinical trials involving patients with complicated skin and skin-structure infections and complicated intra-abdominal infections, including patients infected with methicillin-resistant S. aureus, demonstrated that tigecycline was bacteriologically and clinically effective with mild-to-moderate gastrointestinal adverse events (i.e., nausea, vomiting and diarrhea) the most commonly reported. Tigecycline is a promising new broad-spectrum parenteral monotherapy for the treatment of patients with Gram-positive and -negative bacterial infections.

Sequential intravenous/oral moxifloxacin monotherapy for complicated skin and skin structure infections: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

OBJECTIVES

The presumed superiority of moxifloxacin for the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections (cSSSIs) is based on laboratory data, but has not yet been established on clinical grounds. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sequential intravenous (i.v.)/oral (p.o.) moxifloxacin monotherapy for the treatment of cSSSIs.

METHODS

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published prior to November 2012 were systematically retrieved from PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, ScienceDirect, ClinicalTrials.gov and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Finally, a meta-analysis of all RCTs eligible for inclusion criteria was performed.

RESULTS

Three studies that enrolled 2255 patients were included in the meta-analysis. There were no statistically significant differences between patients given moxifloxacin and those given other antibiotics with regard to clinical success rate [1667 patients, odds ratio (OR) = 0.83, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.63 to 1.09, p = 0.18], bacteriological success rate (bacteriological success rates: 1502 patients, OR = 0.90, 95% CI 0.68-1.18, p = 0.45) or mortality (2207 patients, OR = 1.96, 95% CI 0.79-4.88, p = 0.15). Significantly, more overall adverse events (AEs) were associated with the use of moxifloxacin than with other antibiotics (2207 patients, OR = 1.21, 95%CI 1.00-1.45, p = 0.04). However, there was no statistically significant difference in the occurrence of drug-related AEs, serious AEs or serious drug-related AEs between patients given moxifloxacin and those given other antibiotics.

CONCLUSION

Sequential i.v./p.o. moxifloxacin monotherapy is an effective and relatively safe option for the treatment of cSSSIs. Other benefits of moxifloxacin may make it a more viable option compared with the currently used regimens.

Ceftaroline in complicated skin and skin-structure infections

Ceftaroline is an advanced-generation cephalosporin antibiotic recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of complicated skin and skin-structure infections (cSSSIs). This intravenous broad-spectrum antibiotic exerts potent bactericidal activity by inhibiting bacterial cell wall synthesis. A high affinity for the penicillin-binding protein 2a (PBP2a) of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) makes the drug especially beneficial to patients with MRSA cSSSIs. Ceftaroline has proved in multiple well-conducted clinical trials to have an excellent safety and efficacy profile. In adjusted doses it is also recommended for patients with renal or hepatic impairment. Furthermore, the clinical effectiveness and high cure rate demonstrated by ceftaroline in cSSSIs, including those caused by MRSA and other multidrug-resistant strains, warrants its consideration as a first-line treatment option for cSSSIs. This article reviews ceftaroline and its pharmacology, efficacy, and safety data to further elucidate its role in the treatment of cSSSIs.

Meropenem in the treatment of complicated skin and soft tissue infections

Meropenem is a broad-spectrum carbapenem antibiotic with excellent activity against many pathogens associated with complicated skin and soft tissue infections (cSSTIs). At least three studies have shown meropenem to have good clinical efficacy and to be well tolerated in the treatment of cSSTIs. Two open-label studies compared meropenem 500 mg every 8 hours (total evaluable n=146) with imipenem/cilastatin 500mg every 6 hours (n=147). Clinical efficacy rates in evaluable patients 7–14 days after end of treatment were similar, 92% and 100% in meropenem-treated groups versus 89% and 100% in groups receiving imipenem/cilastatin. An additional prospective, randomized, double-blind study evaluated meropenem 500mg every 8 hours (261 evaluable patients) versus imipenem/cilastatin 500 mg every 8 hours (287 patients). Clinical efficacy rates of meropenem and imipenem/cilastatin 7–28 days after end of treatment were 86.2% and 82.9%, respectively. Meropenem was well tolerated in all studies. Carbapenems are currently recommended as appropriate for initial treatment of certain cSSTIs such as those likely to involve mixed and/or multidrug-resistant pathogens. Meropenem is an effective and safe alternative for monotherapy when used for appropriate types of cSSTIs. Higher doses (ie, 1 g every 8 hours) should be considered for treatment of cSSTIs in higher-risk patients where Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a suspected or documented pathogen.

Moxifloxacin in the treatment of skin and skin structure infections

Moxifloxacin is a recent addition to the fluoroquinolone class, differing from ciprofloxacin and other older agents in having much better in vitro activity against Gram-positive aerobes while retaining potent activity against Gram-negative aerobes. It is also active against the pathogens of human and animal bite wounds and those species of atypical mycobacteria associated with dermatologic infections. Its activity against anaerobes is quite variable. Moxifloxacin penetrates well into inflammatory blister fluid and muscle and subcutaneous adipose tissues. Moxifloxacin should thus be a reasonable option for the treatment of skin and skin structure infections (SSSIs). In 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), oral moxifloxacin was as effective as cephalexin in the treatment of uncomplicated SSSIs in adults while in 2 RCTs, intravenous/oral moxifloxacin was as effective as intravenous/oral β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor therapy in the treatment of complicated SSSIs in adults. Moxifloxacin does not inhibit cytochrome P450 enzymes and thus interact with warfarin or methylxanthines. However, multivalent cations can reduce its oral bioavailability substantially. Dosage adjustment is not required in the presence of renal or hepatic impairment. The clinical relevance of its electrophysiologic effects (QT_c prolongation) remains unresolved.

Antibiotic optimization in the difficult-to-treat patient with complicated intra-abdominal or complicated skin and skin structure infections: focus on tigecycline

Complicated intra-abdominal and skin and skin structure infections are widely varied in presentation. These infections very often lead to an increase in length of hospital stay, with a resulting increase in costs and mortality. In addition, these infections may be caused by a wide variety of bacteria and are often polymicrobial with the possibility of the presence of antimicrobial-resistant strains, such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, vancomycin-resistant enterococci, extended-spectrum β-lactamase strains (Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae), and K. pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing strains. In combination with patients’ immunosuppression or comorbidities, the treatment and management options for initial therapy success are few. Tigecycline, a new glycylcyline antimicrobial from the tetracycline drug class, represents a viable option for the successful treatment of these infections. It has been shown to have activity against a wide variety of bacteria, including the antimicrobial-resistant strains. As with all tetracycline drugs, it is not recommended for pregnant or nursing women. The potential side effects are those typical of tetracycline drugs: nausea, vomiting, and headaches. Drug–drug interactions are not expected, and renal function monitoring is not necessary.

Efficacy and safety of linezolid in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) complicated skin and soft tissue infection (cSSTI): a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical and microbiological outcomes of linezolid versus vancomycin in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) complicated skin and soft-tissue infection (cSSTI) using a meta-analysis.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Clinical trials were identified using PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the International Pharmaceutical Abstracts from inception to March 2009. Primary outcomes evaluated resolution of signs and symptoms of infection in clinically evaluable (CE) patients, and microbiological eradication in both the modified intent-to-treat (MITT) and MRSA evaluable (MRSA ME) patients. MITT patients had a culture-confirmed Gram-positive pathogen (S. aureus) at baseline. Secondary outcomes included mortality, adverse drug reactions (ADR), and discontinuation due to ADRs. The Mantel-Haenszel odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using the fixed effects model based on the assumption that there was little to no heterogeneity between the studies in the primary analysis. Sensitivity analyses were performed for each outcome by removing the most weighted study.

RESULTS

Five studies with a total of 2652 patients (1361/linezolid; 1291/vancomycin) were identified. Resolution of infection in CE patients (OR = 1.41; 95% CI: 1.03, 1.95) and MITT patients (OR = 1.91; 95% CI: 1.33, 2.76) favored the use of linezolid over vancomycin, but did not remain significant after sensitivity analyses (CE: OR = 1.29; 95% CI: 0.81, 2.05; MITT: OR = 1.73; 95% CI: 0.87, 3.41). Microbiological eradication in MRSA ME patients consistently favored the use of linezolid over vancomycin (OR = 2.90; 95% CI: 1.90, 4.41). No difference in mortality was observed between the two groups (OR = 1.17; 95% CI: 0.85, 1.62). Higher proportions of linezolid patients were found to have diarrhea (119/1361 vs. 52/1291), nausea (102/1361 vs. 46/1291) and thrombocytopenia (54/1121 vs. 8/1071), whereas a higher proportion of vancomycin patients were found to have renal insufficiency compared to linezolid (16/634 vs. 4/703). Inconsistent results were seen with the incidence of anemia and rash between the base-case (anemia: OR = 1.36; 95% CI: 0.90, 2.08; rash: OR = 0.26; 95% CI: 0.10, 0.68) and sensitivity analyses (anemia: OR = 2.33; 95% CI: 1.24, 4.37; rash: OR = 0.57; 95% CI: 0.12, 2.71). Discontinuation due to ADRs was not statistically different between linezolid and vancomycin (OR = 1.06; 95% CI: 0.75, 1.51).

CONCLUSION

Resolution of infection in CE and MITT patients were inconsistent; however, a sub-analysis revealed that linezolid was more likely to consistently achieve microbiologic eradication in MRSA ME patients. Apparent risks of thrombocytopenia, nausea, diarrhea, and possibly anemia may limit linezolid use in treating MRSA cSSTI. This study was limited due to an inability to assess for the effects of hetero-resistance and appropriate vancomycin dosing on outcomes. Moreover, the small number of studies made controlling for heterogeneity challenging.

Tigecycline: A review of a new glycylcycline antibiotic

Tigecycline derived from minocycline. It is part of a new class of antibiotics called glycylcyclines. Tigecycline is given intravenously and has activity against a variety of gram-positive and gram-negative bacterial pathogens, many of which are resistant to existing antibiotics. Tigecycline successfully completed phase III trials in which it was at least equal to intravenous vancomycin and aztreonam to treat complicated skin and skin structure infections (cSSSI), and to intravenous imipenem and cilastatin to treat complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAI). Tigecycline side effects are primarily digestive upset. It should be a valuable addition to the armamentarium to treat even the most resistant pathogens.

Analysis of genetic diversity amongStaphylococcus aureusisolates from patients with deep-seated and superficial staphylococcal infections using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis

Molecular typing was performed to reveal the genetic diversity among Staphylococcus aureus strains causing deep-seated versus superficial staphylococcal infections. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis with cluster analysis, plasmid and antimicrobial susceptibility profiling of 50 S. aureus strains collected from these 2 groups of patients were undertaken. A total of 19 (designated A through S) distinct genotypes were identified by PFGE of Sma I-digested genomic DNA. The most prevalent PFGE type was L, which accounted for 30% of isolates and was detected among superficial isolates only. The second most prevalent PFGE type, type A (18%), was predominant among deep-seated isolates. Remaining PFGE types varied in distribution between the 2 groups. Plasmid profile analysis revealed that deep isolates harbour plasmids more frequently (comprising 64% of isolates) than superficial isolates (4%) and showed 10 and 2 distinct patterns, respectively, with pattern 1 being the dominant among deep isolates. Antimicrobial susceptibility data suggested an increased prevalence of antibiotic resistance among deep isolates with the majority (40%) exhibiting identical antibiograms compared to superficial isolates. No resistance was detected against clindamycin and vancomycin. The results of our study indicate a previously unrecognized dichotomy of S. aureus strains, causing deep-seated and superficial infections.

Moxifloxacin distribution in the interstitial space of infected decubitus ulcer tissue of patients with spinal cord injury measured by in vivo microdialysis

We investigated the distribution of moxifloxacin in the interstitial space of normal and infected subcutaneous tissue in patients with spinal cord injury and decubitus ulcers using in vivo microdialysis. Drug concentrations achieved in serum, saliva, normal and infected tissues showed approximately parallel time profiles. The interstitial tissue fluids reached bactericidal levels for common bacteria found in infected skin lesions. Our findings suggest that moxifloxacin exhibits good and similar penetration into the interstitial space fluid in normal subcutaneous tissue and infected decubitus ulcers in patients with spinal cord injury.

Skin and soft tissue infections

Skin and soft tissue infections are a common cause of hospitalization and use of antibiotic therapy, and may result in significant disability. Infections managed by surgeons may vary from simple, noncomplicated cellulitis to severe necrotizing soft tissue infections. The differentiation of necrotizing infections from nonnecrotizing infections is critical to achieving adequate surgical therapy. An understanding of the changing epidemiology of all complicated skin and soft tissue infections is required for selection of appropriate empiric antibiotic therapy.

Potency and bactericidal activity of iclaprim against recent clinical gram-positive isolates

The in vitro activity of iclaprim, a novel diaminopyrimidine derivative, was evaluated against 5,937 recent gram-positive clinical isolates collected in the United States and Europe. Iclaprim demonstrated potent activity against Staphylococcus aureus (including methicillin-resistant S. aureus [MRSA]), beta-hemolytic Streptococcus spp., and Enterococcus faecalis strains tested. In addition, iclaprim exhibited bactericidal activity against all S. aureus strains tested, including MRSA.

Cost-effectiveness of linezolid versus vancomycin for hospitalised patients with complicated skin and soft-tissue infections in Germany

This study used a decision analytic model approach to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of linezolid versus vancomycin in the empirical treatment of complicated skin and soft-tissue infection (cSSTI) due to suspected methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) from the German hospital and health care system perspective. Clinical probabilities were obtained from trial data, resource utilisation and MRSA prevalence rates were obtained through German physician interviews, and costs from published sources were applied to resource units. Outcomes included total cost/patient and cure. The estimated first-line cure rate for linezolid-treated patients was 90.1% versus 85.5% for vancomycin; total cure rates after two lines of treatment were 98.4% and 98.1%, respectively. Average total cost/episode was 8,232 euro for linezolid versus 9,206 euro for vancomycin. The model outcomes were sensitive to changes in length of stay (LOS), isolation days, rate of confirmed MRSA and price of linezolid. Linezolid was expected to result in a shorter intravenous treatment duration and shorter LOS that offset its higher acquisition cost versus vancomycin in cSSTI in Germany.

Update on the efficacy and tolerability of meropenem in the treatment of serious bacterial infections

Meropenem is a carbapenem antibiotic approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of complicated skin and skin-structure infections, complicated intra-abdominal infections, and pediatric bacterial meningitis (in patients >or=3 months of age). In clinical trials, it also has shown efficacy as initial empirical therapy for the treatment of nosocomial pneumonia. Unlike other beta-lactam antibiotics, including third-generation cephalosporins, carbapenems have shown activity against extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing and AmpC chromosomal beta-lactamase-producing bacteria. Compared with imipenem, meropenem is more active against gram-negative pathogens and somewhat less active against gram-positive pathogens, and it does not require coadministration of a renal dehydropeptidase inhibitor. In most comparative trials, clinical and bacteriological response rates with imipenem and meropenem were similar. Compared with clindamycin/tobramycin, meropenem is associated with a reduced length of hospital stay and a shorter duration of therapy among patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections. Meropenem is well tolerated by children and adults and has an acceptable safety profile. Alternative meropenem dosing strategies for the optimization of outcomes are under investigation.

Effectiveness and duration of daptomycin therapy in resolving clinical symptoms in the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections

OBJECTIVE

Compare the rapidity of the resolution of clinical signs and symptoms of complicated skin and skin structure infections (cSSSIs) caused by gram-positive organisms between daptomycin and comparator agents.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A subset of South African patients with gram-positive cSSSIs and no or one comorbid condition from two phase III clinical trials were included in the analysis. Patients were treated with daptomycin (n = 174) or comparator (penicillinase-resistant penicillins [n = 146] or vancomycin [n = 6]). The presence and severity of eight clinical signs and symptoms were evaluated at baseline, day 3 or 4 of treatment, end of therapy, and at test of cure (6-20 days after the last dose).

RESULTS

Of the 326 patients included in this analysis, the clinical success rates between daptomycin and comparator treatments was comparable. Overall, the severity of symptoms in the daptomycin-treated patients improved more quickly (p = 0.04) than comparator treatment. At the day 3/4 evaluation, of the eight signs and symptoms, severity significantly decreased for induration (p = 0.03) and erythema (p = 0.05); a statistical trend was noted for necrotic tissue (p = 0.10) and edema (p = 0.10) in daptomycin-treated patients. Daptomycin treatment resulted in a shorter median duration of therapy than those receiving comparator treatment (7 vs. 8 days, p < 0.0001). Both treatments were well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

Daptomycin produced a more rapid clinical improvement than comparators, as evidenced by significant reductions in the severity of induration and erythema, with a shorter duration of antibiotic therapy. However, this population was relatively young and healthy; therefore, these results may not be generalizable to all populations.

Treating diabetic foot infections with sequential intravenous to oral moxifloxacin compared with piperacillin–tazobactam/amoxicillin–clavulanate

OBJECTIVES

Complicated skin and skin structure infections (cSSSIs), including diabetic foot infections (DFIs), are often polymicrobial, requiring combination or broad-spectrum therapy. Moxifloxacin, a broad-spectrum fluoroquinolone, is approved for cSSSI and can be administered by either intravenous (iv) or oral routes. To assess the efficacy of moxifloxacin for treating DFIs, we analysed a subset of patients with these infections who were enrolled in a prospective, double-blind study that compared the efficacy of moxifloxacin with piperacillin-tazobactam and amoxicillin-clavulanate.

METHODS

Patients>or=18 years of age with a DFI requiring initial iv therapy were randomized to either moxifloxacin (400 mg/day) or piperacillin-tazobactam (3.0/0.375 g every 6 h) for at least 3 days followed by moxifloxacin (400 mg/day orally) or amoxicillin-clavulanate (800 mg every 12 h orally), if appropriate, for 7-14 days. DFI was usually defined as any foot infection plus a history of diabetes. Our primary efficacy outcome was the clinical response of the infection at test-of-cure (TOC), 10-42 days post-therapy.

RESULTS

Among 617 patients enrolled in the original study, 78 with DFIs were evaluable for treatment efficacy. Clinical cure rates at TOC were similar for moxifloxacin and piperacillin-tazobactam/amoxicillin-clavulanate (68% versus 61%) for patients with investigator-defined infection (P=0.54). Overall pathogen eradication rates in the microbiologically-valid population were 69% versus 66% for moxifloxacin and comparator, respectively (P=1.00).

CONCLUSIONS

Intravenous+/-oral moxifloxacin was as effective as iv piperacillin-tazobactam+/-amoxicillin-clavulanate in treating moderate-to-severe DFIs. Moxifloxacin may have potential as a monotherapy regimen for DFIs.

Skin and skin structure infections: treatment with newer generation fluoroquinolones

Skin and skin structure infections (SSSI) are an emerging issue in healthcare. They are responsible for increasing heathcare utilization, both in hospitalizations and intravenous antibiotic use. SSSI are caused by an evolving variety of pathogens, including Gram-positive, Gram-negative, and anaerobic bacteria. In combination with mounting resistance patterns, this diverse range of bacteria mandate empiric broad-spectrum antibiotic coverage. Historically, cephalosporins and penicillins have been the mainstay of treatment, but recent data suggest newer generation fluoroquinolones are being used with increasing frequency. In 2005, moxifloxacin joined gatifloxacin and levofloxacin as newer generation fluoroquionolones with Food and Drug Administration indications for SSSIs. Even within this group there exist subtle differences that impact optimal management. This paper offers the clinician a comparative review of the antimicrobial spectrum, pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, and clinical efficacy data to support the appropriate use of fluoroquinolones in SSSIs.

Bacterial superantigen facilitates epithelial presentation of allergen to T helper 2 cells

Although clinical and laboratory evidence support roles for both staphylococcal infection and environmental allergens in the pathogenesis of atopic dermatitis, human studies have largely considered these variables independently. We sought to test the hypothesis that staphylococcal superantigen influences the allergen-specific T cell response. We first mapped a Der p 1 epitope and used HLA DRB1*1501 class II tetramer-based cell sorted populations to show that specific CD4(+) T cells were able to recognize the peptide presented by HLA DR-matched keratinocytes. We observed that staphylococcal enterotoxin B (SEB) enhanced the IL-4 Der p 1-specific T cell response. This response was mediated by two synergistic mechanisms: first, SEB-induced IFN-gamma promoted class II and intercellular adhesion molecule-1 expression by presenting keratinocytes; and second, SEB-induced IL-4 directly amplified allergen-specific CD4(+) T cell production of many cytokines. We propose that handling of staphylococcal infection is a critical step in the amplification of the allergen-specific T cell response, linking two common disease associations and with implications for the prevention and treatment of atopic disease.

Increasing incidence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in hand infections: a 3-year county hospital experience

BACKGROUND

Staphylococcus aureus is the most common cause of skin and soft-tissue infections. Methicillin-resistant S. aureus and community-acquired methicillin-resistant S. aureus have shown an increase in prevalence among soft-tissue infections over the past several years, with overall rates approaching 50 percent at the authors' institution in 2002. The object of this study was to determine the incidence of methicillin-resistant S. aureus with respect to hand infections, the antibiotic resistance pattern of methicillin-resistant S. aureus isolates, and implications for a change in antibiotic treatment algorithms for hand infections.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of 761 patients with hand infections tracked by International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision codes for finger or hand abscesses from 2001 to 2003 was performed at Parkland Memorial Hospital, Dallas, Texas. Culture results were obtained from 436 patients and analyzed for type of organism, and sensitivity profiles were obtained for all methicillin-resistant S. aureus isolates.

RESULTS

The median age of 761 patients was 40 years (range, 16 to 77 years); 71 percent were male and 28 percent were female. Of the 436 cultures reviewed, 371 (85 percent) had organisms identified. Methicillin-resistant S. aureus was the dominant single organism in hand infections cultured in all 3 years. The overall methicillin-resistant S. aureus rate was 61 percent of all hand infections in 2003. The percentage of S. aureus isolates identified as methicillin-resistant S. aureus increased from 55 percent to 78 percent over 3 years, up from 34 percent in 2001. Fortunately, 86 percent of these methicillin-resistant S. aureus isolates demonstrated sensitivity to conventional antibiotics, but a trend of resistance is developing.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of community-acquired methicillin-resistant S. aureus increased from 34 percent to 61 percent over a 3-year period at the authors' county institution. An increasing trend of resistance patterns among conventional antibiotics was also demonstrated. As a result of this study, the treatment algorithm at Parkland Memorial Hospital has been modified to include abscess drainage accompanied by an antibiotic regimen targeted specifically at methicillin-resistant S. aureus. These data also have implications for broader application regarding simple skin infections and current antibiotic treatment algorithms.

Fluoroquinolones vs beta-lactams for empirical treatment of immunocompetent patients with skin and soft tissue infections: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness and safety of fluoroquinolones with beta-lactams in the treatment of patients with skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs).

METHODS

We searched the PubMed database, Cochrane Database of Controlled Trials, and references of relevant articles for study reports published between January 1980 and February 2006.

RESULTS

Twenty randomized controlled trials that enrolled 4817 patients were included in the analysis. Fluoroquinolones as empirical treatment of patients with SSTIs were more effective than beta-lactams for the clinically evaluable patients (90.4% vs 88.2%; odds ratio [OR], 1.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00-1.66). This was also true in subset analyses of randomized controlled trials that studied ciprofloxacin (OR, 2.49; 95% CI, 1.45-4.26) and for patients with mild to moderate infections (OR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.13-2.96). In contrast, no difference was found between the compared regimens for patients with moderate to severe infections (OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.80-1.55), for patients who did not receive third-generation cephalosporins as the comparator antibiotic (OR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.73-1.34), or for the microbiologically evaluable patients (OR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.89-1.59). Fluoroquinolones were also associated with more adverse effects (19.2% vs 15.2%; OR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.13-1.57).

CONCLUSION

The high proportion of successfully treated patients in the compared groups of antibiotics and the development of more adverse effects associated with fluoroquinolone use suggest that these antibiotics do not have substantial advantages compared with beta-lactams for empirical treatment of patients with SSTIs.

Management of sepsis during the early "golden hours"

Severe sepsis and septic shock are common causes of morbidity and mortality. Interventions directed at specific endpoints, when initiated early in the "golden hours" of patient arrival at the hospital, seem to be promising. Early hemodynamic optimization, administration of appropriate antimicrobial therapy, and effective source control of infection are the cornerstones of successful management. In patients with vasopressor-dependent septic shock, provision of physiologic doses of replacement steroids may result in improved survival. Administration of drotrecogin alfa (activated), (activated protein C) has been shown to improve survival in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock who have a high risk of mortality. In this article we review the multi-modality approach to early diagnosis and intervention in the therapy of patients with severe sepsis and septic shock.

A post hoc subgroup analysis of meropenem versus imipenem/cilastatin in a multicenter, double-blind, randomized study of complicated skin and skin-structure infections in patients with diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

In a multicenter, international, double-blind, randomized clinical trial involving hospitalized patients with complicated skin and skin-structure infections (cSSSIs), meropenem and imipenem/cilastatin (both administered 500 mg intravenously every 8 hours) were not significantly different in their efficacy and safety profiles.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the post hoc subgroup analysis discussed in the current article was to report the efficacy and tolerability of meropenem and imipenem/cilastatin for the treatment of cSSSIs in patients with or without underlying diabetes mellitus (DM).

METHODS

Hospitalized patients aged > or =13 years with evidence of cSSSIs were eligible for inclusion. Patients were randomized to receive meropenem or imipenem/cilastatin, each 500 mg intravenously every 8 hours, for at least 3 days and up to a maximum of 14 days. Patients were analyzed according to the presence or absence of DM and by the pathogen(s) isolated from wound cultures at baseline, end of N treatment, and test-of-cure visits. The primary efficacy end point was clinical outcome at the posttreatment follow-up (test-of-cure) visit in the clinically evaluable and modified intent-to-treat (intent-to-treat [ITT] subjects who met all eligibility criteria) populations; this was defined as 7 to 14 days after final administration of antibiotics. The secondary efficacy end points included clinical response at the test-of-cure visit in the ITT population (ie, those who received >1 dose of study drug) and at the end of N treatment visit in the clinically evaluable and fully evaluable populations. At baseline, the end of N treatment, and the test-of-cure visits, specimens were obtained from the most extensive site of skin and skin-structure infection and were cultured for bacteria. Adverse events were monitored daily during treatment and for 30 days after the completion of all antibiotic treatment.

RESULTS

Of the 1076 patients enrolled in the original study, 398 had DM. The mean ages of patients with and without DM were 55 and 45 years, respectively; 17.3% of patients with DM and 6.1% of patients without DM had impaired renal function at study entry. Complex abscess was the most common infection diagnosis in both groups (patients with DM, 30.0%; patients without DM, 48.8%). The other top infections per group (patients with and without DM, respectively) were as follows: cellulitis, 24.6% and 12.4%; and ischemic/diabetic ulcers, 20.9% and 1.9%. Gram-negative aerobic and anaerobic pathogens accounted for >40% of bacterial isolates from both groups, with polymicrobial infections reported in 44.2% of patients with DM and 34.0% of patients without DM. In the clinically evaluable population, the satisfactory clinical response rate was 85.6% for patients with DM receiving meropenem and 72.4% for those receiving imipenem/cilastatin; for patients without DM, those rates were 86.6% and 89.0%, respectively. Meropenem and imipenem/cilastatin were generally well tolerated. Reported adverse events were similar between groups.

CONCLUSION

This subgroup analysis found that 500 mg every 8 hours intravenously of meropenem or imipenem/cilastatin appeared efficacious and well tolerated for the treatment of cSSSIs among these patients with and without DM.

The search for new antimicrobials: why we need new options

The increasing identification of antibiotic-resistant pathogens that cause serious infections cannot be ignored. Although the future cannot be predicted with certainty, it is surely possible that an extensive epidemic of resistant bacterial infections could potentially harm millions of people. Given that it takes more than 10 years to establish the efficacy and safety of new compounds, there is an urgent need to restock the antibiotic pipeline. Only a few new antibacterial agents have received approval by the US Food and Drug Administration in the last 5 years, including linezolid in 2001, cefditoren, pivoxil and ertapenem in 2002, gemifloxacin and daptomycin in 2003, and telithromycin in 2004. Many of these agents are improved derivatives from established classes of antibiotics, and several are directed primarily at resistant Gram-positive bacteria (e.g., linezolid and daptomycin). One promising new addition is the recent approval of tigecycline (Tigacyl, Wyeth) in June 2005.

The issue of antimicrobial resistance in human medicine

Antibiotics are used worldwide in human medicine and agriculture. In many cases the use of antibiotics is unnecessary or questionable. Consumption of antibiotics is linked to bacterial resistance. In hospitals, most common resistant bacteria include methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, vancomycin-resistant enterococci and Gram-negative rods including Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Vancomycin intermediate and resistant S. aureus, described just recently, represent a new treatment challenge. In the community, penicillin and macrolide-resistant pneumococci developed several decades ago and are now present all over the world. More recently, community-acquired methicillin-resistant S. aureus has become a problem in several countries causing skin infections but also severe diseases. Resistance to co-trimoxazole in Escherichia coli has changed empirical treatment of urinary tract infections, one of the most common causes of the visit to the physician's office. Several reports and studies trying to limit the use of antibiotics have shown that antimicrobial resistance of bacteria can be reversed, but in general the problem is far from being solved. World Health Assembly and the European Community Council have recognized the problem of antibiotic resistance as a priority. The relationship between agricultural use of antimicrobials and antibacterial resistance in humans should be further investigated.

Impact of linezolid on economic outcomes and determinants of cost in a clinical trial evaluating patients with MRSA complicated skin and soft-tissue infections

BACKGROUND

In clinical trials, linezolid has demonstrated higher clinical cure rates and shorter hospital duration for patients than has vancomycin for the treatment of complicated skin and soft-tissue infections (cSSTIs).

OBJECTIVE

To assess economic outcomes of linezolid versus vancomycin and evaluate determinants of treatment costs for cSSTIs.

METHODS

Economic data were obtained from US subjects enrolled in a multinational, open-label, clinical trial of cSSTIs caused by suspected or proven methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Subjects were randomized to receive intravenous or oral linezolid or intravenous vancomycin for 7-21 days. Costs for each patient were evaluated by applying nationally representative per diem hospital costs by hospital ward. Intravenous administration costs were applied to the duration of intravenous treatment. Factors contributing to the cost of therapy were evaluated using multivariate regression analysis.

RESULTS

Seven hundred seventeen US patients were included in the study. Demographics were similar between treatment groups. Length of stay and duration of intravenous therapy were shorter for linezolid-treated patients. Mean +/- SD cost for intent-to-treat population patients treated with linezolid versus vancomycin was 4865 US dollars +/- 4367 versus 5738 US dollars +/- 5190, respectively (p = 0.017), and in the MRSA population was 4881 US dollars +/- 3987 versus 6006 US dollars +/- 5039, respectively (p = 0.041). Factors significantly associated with increased cost included vancomycin therapy, age, and comorbidities, including diabetes. After adjusting for all other factors, treatment with linezolid was associated with significantly lower treatment costs compared with vancomycin.

CONCLUSIONS

Linezolid therapy was associated with improved clinical outcomes and significantly lower treatment costs than was vancomycin. The largest cost advantage was demonstrated in patients with documented MRSA cSSTIs.

Meropenem versus imipenem-cilastatin for the treatment of hospitalized patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections: results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind comparative study

BACKGROUND

Meropenem, a broad-spectrum carbapenem with potent in vitro activity, is postulated to be an effective monotherapy for the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections (cSSSI).

METHODS

This multicenter, international, double-blind, randomized, prospective study of hospitalized patients with cSSSI evaluated the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of meropenem (500 mg IV q8h) versus imipenem-cilastatin (500 mg IV q8h). The primary efficacy endpoint was clinical outcome at follow-up in the clinically evaluable (CE) and modified intent-to-treat populations (MITT; patients who met eligibility criteria and received at least one dose of study drug). The study aimed to demonstrate non-inferiority (delta of 10%, 95% confidence intervals) in clinical response in the CE population. Clinical responses for all pathogens at follow-up were assessed in the fully evaluable population (CE population with baseline pathogen and follow-up cultures).

RESULTS

In total, 1,076 patients were enrolled. Of these, 692 patients comprised the MITT population (334 and 358 patients randomized to meropenem and imipenem-cilastatin, respectively) and 548 the CE population (261 and 287 patients randomized to meropenem and imipenem-cilastatin, respectively). Cure rates were 86.2% (meropenem) and 82.9% (imipenemcilastatin; 95% CI, -2.8, 9.3) in the CE population and 73.1% (meropenem) and 74.9% (imipenem-cilastatin; 95% CI, -8.4, 4.7) in the MITT population. The frequencies of adverse events and drug-related adverse events were similar between treatment groups.

CONCLUSION

In one of the largest studies conducted to date of hospitalized patients with cSSSI, meropenem, 500 mg IV q8h had comparable safety and efficacy to imipenem-cilastatin, 500 mg IV q8h.

Sequential intravenous/oral moxifloxacin versus intravenous piperacillin-tazobactam followed by oral amoxicillin-clavulanate for the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infection

In this prospective, double-blind, multicentre trial, adult patients with complicated skin and skin structure infection (cSSSI) randomly received sequential intravenous (i.v.)/oral (p.o.) moxifloxacin (400 mg once a day) or a control regimen of i.v. piperacillin-tazobactam (3.0/0.375 g every 6 h) followed by p.o. amoxicillin-clavulanate (800 mg every 12 h), each for 7-14 days. Clinical cure rates at the test-of-cure visit (10-42 days post therapy) for the efficacy-valid population were 79% (143/180) for the moxifloxacin-treated group and 82% (153/187) for the control group (95% confidence interval, -12.04, 3.29). Bacteriological eradication rates for Staphylococcus aureus, the most prevalent organism, were 78% and 80%, respectively. The incidence of drug-related adverse events was similar for both groups (31% moxifloxacin, 30% control). Sequential i.v./p.o. moxifloxacin was as effective and well tolerated as i.v. piperacillin-tazobactam followed by p.o. amoxicillin-clavulanate in treating patients with cSSSI.

Current use of anti-infectives in dermatology

Dermatologic diseases encompass a broad category of pathologic situations. Infection remains a significant aspect of the pathology faced in patient encounters, and it is natural to expect that anti-infectives play a major element in the armamentarium utilized by dermatologists. Aside from the treatment of the classic bacterial and fungal infections, there are now new uses for antiviral agents to help suppress recurrent disease, such as herpes simplex. There is also the novel approach of using anti-infectives, or agents that have been thought to have antimicrobial activity, to treat inflammatory diseases. This review describes anti-infectives, beginning with common antibiotics used to treat bacterial infections. The discussion will then cover the current use of antivirals. Finally, the description of antifungals will be separated, starting with the oral agents and ending with the topical antimycotics. The use of anti-infectives in tropical dermatology has been purposefully left out, and perhaps should be the subject of a separate review. Cutaneous bacterial infections consist chiefly of those microorganisms that colonize the skin, such as species of staphylococcus and streptococcus. Propionibacterium acnes and certain other anaerobes can be involved in folliculitis, pyodermas and in chronic conditions such as hidradenitis suppurativa.

In vitro activity and killing effect of citropin 1.1 against gram-positive pathogens causing skin and soft tissue infections

The in vitro activity of citropin 1.1 against gram-positive cocci was measured by MIC, minimal bactericidal concentration, time-kill studies, and a checkerboard titration method. Streptococci and staphylococci were inhibited at concentrations between 1 and 16 mg/liter, respectively. Enterococci showed less susceptibility. Synergy was demonstrated when citropin 1.1 was combined with clarithromycin and doxycycline.