Management and costs of treating lung cancer patients in a university hospital

Cost of Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVES

We performed a systematic review of studies estimating the cost of illness of lung cancer to compare costs between studies and examine cost drivers, emphasizing generalizability and methodological choices.

METHODS

A systematic search on studies published in English on cost of illness of lung cancer was performed in MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus. Databases were searched in January 2017, and records were screened based on eligibility criteria. The systematic search was updated on May 7, 2020. The quality of included studies was appraised using a modified Drummond checklist.

RESULTS

Of the 4891 records screened, 19 records were included. Most of the studies were cross-sectional and retrospective and used a prevalence-based approach and a bottom-up approach. Direct medical costs ranged from 4484.13 US dollars purchasing power parity to 45 364.48 US dollars purchasing power parity. Total medical costs as a percentage of total gross domestic product (GDP) ranged from 0.00248 to 0.1326 (median 0.0217), and total medical costs as a percentage of total health expenditure ranged from 0.038 to 0.836 (median 0.209).

CONCLUSIONS

There was considerable methodological heterogeneity that made it difficult to compare results between studies. The costs of lung cancer are substantial and impose a substantial economic burden on patients, healthcare systems, and societies. By comparing cancer costs with total health expenditures and GDP per capita, it can be concluded that lung cancer imposes a considerable economic burden on patients and healthcare systems in countries with lower GDP per capita and higher incidence rate.

End-of-Life Health-Care Cost of Patients With Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Study

Introduction:

Lung cancer exerts a significant societal and health-care–related economic burden and chemotherapy drugs constitute a major factor of total direct cost. The aim of the present study was to assess the direct health-care cost of lung cancer in Greece by conducting a retrospective analysis on the last 6 months of life.

Methods:

The present study was based on both the medical data and costs of treatment of deceased adult patients who suffered from terminal stage IIIB/IV lung cancer (non-small cell lung cancer and small cell lung cancer) during the last 6 months of their life. The study’s protocol was approved by the Hospital’s Research Ethics Committee. Costs included outpatient (outpatient services) and inpatient (inpatient services) costs. Descriptive statistics were mainly used for statistical analysis.

Results:

The files of 144 patients were analyzed. The total cost of health-care services for the study population during the last 6 months of life was attributed by 57% to inpatient services, whereas chemotherapy costs (74%) comprised the largest proportion of the total inpatient cost. The highest expenditure for outpatient services was attributed to concomitant medication (59%), followed by the cost of tests (21%) and radiotherapy (20%).

Conclusions:

The results of our study indicate that both inpatient and outpatient costs were substantial. The main inpatient and outpatient cost drivers were chemotherapy and concomitant medication, respectively. A more comprehensive nationwide study would be useful to validate our results and to include also indirect costs of cancer care in Greece.

The cost of hospital treatment of advanced stage lung cancer patients in a developing South East European country

Assessing the lung cancer treatment costs is necessary in order to estimate the budget impact of new interventions and therapeutic innovations. However, there are few studies regarding the use of resources and costs associated with treatment of lung cancer patients, not only in Serbia, but internationally. The aim of this paper was to assess the hospital costs of diagnosing and treating patients with stage IIIB and IV non-small cell lung cancer. Analysis of costs of care, services, medications and medical supplies, as well as of total hospital costs, was performed. Patients diagnosed with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC in the Institute during the year 2013 were enrolled in the study. A total of 187 patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC were analyzed. Total hospital costs were 506.970€, of which nearly two thirds was accounted to costs of services and medications. The mean cost per patient with adenocarcinoma was 3.075€, and for squamous cell lung carcinoma patient 1.943€. Statistically significant difference was shown when comparing mean hospital costs between patients in stage IIIB and stage IV adenocarcinoma, where this cost is higher in patients with stage IIIB. Mean hospital cost per female patient was nearly double as high that of the male patients, although without statistically significant difference. The mean cost for all adenocarcinoma patients was 1.317€, and for only four patients treated with TKI therapy 21.233€. This cost analysis could provide useful information in terms of budget impact of different lung cancer treatments and innovations in Serbia and corresponding developing countries.

Changing costs of metastatic non small cell lung cancer in the Netherlands

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective of this study was to identify the total intramural cost of illness of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the Netherlands between 2006-2012. Secondary objective was to identify whether changes in cost patterns of metastatic NSCLC have occurred over the last years.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with metastatic NSCLC between 1-1-2006 and 31-12-2012, who had follow-up to death or the date of data cut-off and no trial participation were included. A structured chart review was performed using a case report form. Data collection started after diagnosis of metastatic NSCLC and ended at death or April first, 2015. Data regarding outpatient visits, clinical attendance, oncolytic drug use, imaging, lab tests, radiotherapy and surgery were collected.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven patients were included with a median age of 67 years. The median follow-up was 234days. On average patients had 28 outpatient visits and 11 inpatient days. Oncolytic drugs were administered to 76% of the patients. Mean per patient expenditures amounted up to €17,463, with oncolytic drugs (€6,390) as the main cost driver. In comparison with the time-period of 2003-2005 total per patient per year expenses decreased by 44%. The contribution to total yearly costs of oncolytic drugs increased from 18% to 35%, while costs for inpatient stay decreased from 52% to 28% of total expenditures.

CONCLUSION

Outcomes in this study demonstrate that average treatment costs for metastatic NSCLC in the Netherlands Cancer Institute amount to €17,463. Compared to a prior study the average cost for metastatic NSCLC over time in the Netherlands has decreased. A shift of main cost drivers seems to have occurred from inpatient stay, to oncolytic drugs as main contributor. The shift towards treatment cost might become more visible with the introduction of immunotherapy. These results mark the importance of up-to-date cost of illness studies.

Economic Burden for Lung Cancer Survivors in Urban China

BACKGROUND

With the rapid increase in the incidence and mortality of lung cancer, a growing number of lung cancer patients and their families are faced with a tremendous economic burden because of the high cost of treatment in China. This study was conducted to estimate the economic burden and patient responsibility of lung cancer patients and the impact of this burden on family income.

METHODS

This study uses data from a retrospective questionnaire survey conducted in 10 communities in urban China and includes 195 surviving lung cancer patients diagnosed over the previous five years. The calculation of direct economic burden included both direct medical and direct nonmedical costs. Indirect costs were calculated using the human capital approach, which measures the productivity lost for both patients and family caregivers. The price index was applied for the cost calculation.

RESULTS

The average economic burden from lung cancer was $43,336 per patient, of which the direct cost per capita was $42,540 (98.16%) and the indirect cost per capita was $795 (1.84%). Of the total direct medical costs, 35.66% was paid by the insurer and 9.84% was not covered by insurance. The economic burden for diagnosed lung cancer patients in the first year following diagnosis was $30,277 per capita, which accounted for 171% of the household annual income, a percentage that fell to 107% after subtracting the compensation from medical insurance.

CONCLUSIONS

The economic burden for lung cancer patients is substantial in the urban areas of China, and an effective control strategy to lower the cost is urgently needed.

Costs of non-small cell lung cancer in the Netherlands

OBJECTIVES

Real-world resource use and cost data on non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are scarce. This data is needed to inform health-economic modelling to assess the impact of new diagnostic and/or treatment technologies. This study provides detailed insight into real-world medical resource use and costs of stage I-IV NSCLC in the Netherlands.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A random sample of patients newly diagnosed with NSCLC (2009-2011) was selected from four Dutch hospitals. Data was retrospectively collected from patient charts. This data included patient characteristics, tumour characteristics, treatment details, adverse events, survival and resource use. Resource use was multiplied by Dutch unit costs expressed in EUR 2012. Total mean costs were corrected for censoring using the Bang and Tsiatis weighted complete-case estimator. Furthermore, costs of adverse events, costs per phase of NSCLC management and costs of second opinions are presented.

RESULTS

Data was collected on 1067 patients. Total mean costs for NSCLC diagnosis, treatment and follow-up are €28,468 during the study period and €33,143 when corrected for censoring. Adverse events were recorded in the patient charts for 369 patients (41%) and 82 patients (9%) experienced an adverse event of grade III or higher. For these patients, adverse event-related hospital admissions cost on average €2,091. Mean total costs are €1,725 for the diagnostic period, €17,296 for first treatment line, and €13,236 for each later treatment line. Costs of providing a second opinion are €2,580 per patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Total mean hospital costs per NSCLC patient are €33,143 for the total duration of the disease. Ignoring censoring in our data underestimates these costs by 14%. Main limitations of the study relate to the short follow-up time, staging difficulties and missing data. Its main strength is that it provides highly detailed, real-world data on the costs of NSCLC.

Estimating the direct and indirect costs of lung cancer: a prospective analysis in a Greek University Pulmonary Department

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer (LC) is a disease with high morbidity and mortality while the prevention and treatment constitutes a significant financial burden. This economic burden has an increasing trend, with hospitalization being the highest cost factor in most studies, while the patients' quality of life (QoL) and response to treatment is not proven to be positively affected.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the direct and indirect cost of managing patients with LC in Greece according to stage and histological type of cancer, total chemotherapy cycles, age, gender, smoking habit, overall survival (OS), treatment outcome (TO) and QoL.

METHODS

One hundred thirteen of 128 consecutive patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in this prospective study. Patient enrolment started in August 2011 and ended in November 2011. The duration of the patient follow up was 32 months after diagnosis until end of registry. Total direct cost included diagnosis and treatment cost. Indirect cost constituted of patient's and family caregivers lost days of productivity. QoL was assessed with EORTC-QLQ-30 and Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) questionnaires before treatment and every three months.

RESULTS

Total direct cost was €1,853,984 and chemotherapy drugs was the highest cost factor (€1,216,421). Total indirect cost was 28,774 days of which 27,293 were related to patients. Total direct cost was significantly related to the increased number of total chemotherapy cycles, longer OS, histological type of adenocarcinoma, female gender and younger patients. No relation was found between total indirect cost and the above factors. When the association between total direct/indirect cost and QoL was examined no significant results were drawn.

CONCLUSIONS

The burden of LC on health care systems remains very high and was associated with the increased number of total chemotherapy cycles, longer OS, adenocarcinoma histological type of cancer, female gender and younger patients. Chemotherapy drugs constituted the higher factor of total direct cost. Indirect cost was considerably higher for patients than family caregivers and did not significantly differ in relation to the above factors. No significant conclusion was drawn regarding QoL and total direct/indirect cost.

Estimation of lung cancer diagnosis and treatment costs based on a patient-level analysis in Catalonia (Spain)

BACKGROUND

Assessing of the costs of treating disease is necessary to demonstrate cost-effectiveness and to estimate the budget impact of new interventions and therapeutic innovations. However, there are few comprehensive studies on resource use and costs associated with lung cancer patients in clinical practice in Spain or internationally. The aim of this paper was to assess the hospital cost associated with lung cancer diagnosis and treatment by histology, type of cost and stage at diagnosis in the Spanish National Health Service.

METHODS

A retrospective, descriptive analysis on resource use and a direct medical cost analysis were performed. Resource utilisation data were collected by means of patient files from nine teaching hospitals. From a hospital budget impact perspective, the aggregate and mean costs per patient were calculated over the first three years following diagnosis or up to death. Both aggregate and mean costs per patient were analysed by histology, stage at diagnosis and cost type.

RESULTS

A total of 232 cases of lung cancer were analysed, of which 74.1% corresponded to non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and 11.2% to small cell lung cancer (SCLC); 14.7% had no cytohistologic confirmation. The mean cost per patient in NSCLC ranged from 13,218 Euros in Stage III to 16,120 Euros in Stage II. The main cost components were chemotherapy (29.5%) and surgery (22.8%). Advanced disease stages were associated with a decrease in the relative weight of surgical and inpatient care costs but an increase in chemotherapy costs. In SCLC patients, the mean cost per patient was 15,418 Euros for limited disease and 12,482 Euros for extensive disease. The main cost components were chemotherapy (36.1%) and other inpatient costs (28.7%). In both groups, the Kruskall-Wallis test did not show statistically significant differences in mean cost per patient between stages.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides the costs of lung cancer treatment based on patient file reviews, with chemotherapy and surgery accounting for the major components of costs. This cost analysis is a baseline study that will provide a useful source of information for future studies on cost-effectiveness and on the budget impact of different therapeutic innovations in Spain.

Cost analysis of lung cancer management in South Western Sydney

INTRODUCTION

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer mortality in Western nations, and associated health-care costs are escalating. The aim of this study was to describe the current pattern of resource use and direct medical costs associated in managing lung cancer in South Western Sydney, Australia.

METHODS

All new cases of primary lung carcinoma discussed at the Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centre (CTC) Lung Cancer Multidisciplinary Team meeting or seen at CTC between 1 December 2005 and 21 December 2006 were reviewed. Staging investigations, hospitalisation, treatment and follow-up investigations were documented from first consultation to last follow-up (31 October 2008 or death). Cost estimates were based on the Australian Medicare Benefits Schedule and reported in Australian dollars. Infrastructure, staff and non-medical costs were excluded.

RESULTS

There were 210 patients, median age 68.2 years (range 39-90) with median follow-up of 16.6 months. The pathology and stage distribution were: 3.8% limited stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC), 10.0% extensive stage SCLC, 13.4% stage I and II non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), 28.5% stage III NSCLC and 44.3% stage IV NSCLC. The estimated total cost for managing this patient cohort was A$2.91 million. The cost components were: staging investigations (10.1%), treatment 41.2% (2.8% surgery, 15.8% radiotherapy and 22.6% chemotherapy), hospitalisation (43.7%) and follow-up investigations (5%). The median costs for managing NSCLC and SCLC subgroups were A$10,675 (range A$669-612,789) and A$14,799 (range A$908-31,057), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Hospitalisation and cancer treatment, particularly chemotherapy, accounted for the major components of direct medical costs in the management of lung cancer.

Lifetime costs of the top five cancers in Taiwan

The purpose of this study was to determine cancer-related medical care costs for long-term cancer care costs of breast, cervical, liver, lung, and colorectal cancer. Data were sourced from Taipei Veterans General Hospital cancer registry and claim data during 1999-2002. Besides, claimed data from National Health Insurance were used to match the comparison group. To estimate lifetime cost (10 years), the whole disease process was divided into initial, continuing, and terminal three phases. The expected lifetime cost of a specific cancer patient was estimated by incorporating the average phase-specific costs with the survival rate and mortality rate. The undiscounted average lifetime costs (10 years) for lung cancer, colorectal cancer, liver cancer, cervical cancer, and breast cancer were NT$448,371 (1USD≒NTD 33), NT$584,985, NT$351,222, NT$511,563, and NT$674,282 (in 2002 NTD), respectively. The aggregate lifetime cost of cancer is useful for health policymaking and clinical decision-making.

Evaluation of the use of a rapid diagnostic consultation of lung cancer. Delay time of diagnosis and therapy

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the results obtained in a lung cancer screening program since its inception five years ago regarding correct referrals, diagnostic and therapeutic delay times and days of hospitalization. To compare the diagnostic-therapeutic delays and hospital stays with those obtained in patients evaluated with the standard system.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Included for study were all those patients evaluated in our Lung Cancer Screening Program (LCSP) in the last five years. For the cases with LC, we recorded the dates the patients were referred to a specialist, the first consultation, diagnostic tests, stage, start of treatment and days of hospitalization. We compared these same data with lung cancer patients who did not partake in the LCSP and were diagnosed between October 2008 and October 2010.

RESULTS

We evaluated 179 patients remitted to the LCSP, which represented 26.7% of the consultations; 166 (92.7%) of the referrals were correct, out of which 44.5% were LC. In 75.6% of these, the entire study was completed in the outpatient setting, and more than 85% of the cases met the current recommendations related with diagnostic-therapeutic delays. When these results were compared with the non-LCSP group (n=151), differences were found in the data for hospitalizations: there was a lower percentage of hospitalizations (P<.0001) and shorter hospital stays (P<.0001) in the LCSP group. There were no differences between the two groups for diagnostic or therapeutic delays.

CONCLUSION

In our setting, lung cancer screening programs allow for cancer studies to be carried out in the outpatient consultations in a large percentage of cases, and within the time periods recommended by current guidelines. In spite of this fact, we have detected that these programs are underused.

Impact of initial pattern of care on hospital costs in a cohort of incident lung cancer cases

RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

Lung cancer is a disease with high consumption of health care resources. The aim of this study was to describe hospital costs due to lung cancer care from diagnosis until death or end of the study follow-up, in a cohort of incident cases, by using administrative data.

METHODS

Particular attention was given to the determinants of total costs and the impact of the initial treatment approach on the process of costs accumulation. Incident cases were identified by the local Cancer Registry (January 2000-December 2003) among the residents of Turin (Italy). Per patient hospital care has been determined from administrative databases (outpatient radiotherapy records and hospital discharge records). Costs determinants were identified via a multivariable generalized linear model (GLM), with a Gamma cost distribution and a logarithmic link function. To assess the time effect over the cost accumulation process for non-small-cell lung cancer cases, the same GLM Gamma model was repeated at different follow-up periods. Analyses were stratified by cancer histotype.

RESULTS

Results evidenced the relevant role of initial patterns of care on the cost accumulation process, with increased midterm costs associated with curative patterns of care.

CONCLUSION

The use of administrative data enabled hospital lung cancer care to be described, and related costs to be estimated.

Analysis of wait times and costs during the peri-diagnostic period for non-small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

To determine the wait times and healthcare costs around the time of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) diagnosis for a large, population-based cohort of patients.

METHODS

Data on baseline demographics, diagnostic and staging tests, timelines of investigations, and frequency of physician visits and hospital admissions were obtained from a provincial cancer registry and health administrative databases for 2852 patients, who were diagnosed with NSCLC from 1996 to 2000 in Manitoba, Canada. Dates between investigations were used to determine wait times surrounding diagnosis and fee codes for physician and hospital services were used to estimate costs.

RESULTS

The median wait times from chest x-ray to chest computed tomography (CT) scan and from CT scan to definitive histological diagnosis were 8 (inter-quartile range 1-25) and 18 (inter-quartile range 3-42) days, respectively. At least 25% of patients waited more than 55 days from initial suspicion on chest x-ray to final diagnosis of NSCLC. The mean cost per case of NSCLC diagnosis was $6,978 (in Canadian dollars) where the majority of expenses was attributed to hospital admissions and repeated physician visits before a diagnosis was confirmed.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite clinical suspicion for NSCLC, a significant number of patients wait more than 8 weeks for a definitive diagnosis. Substantial costs are incurred by the Canadian universal healthcare system in the months surrounding diagnosis. Establishment of more efficient and cost-effective healthcare delivery in the peri-diagnostic time period may benefit the system as well as the patients.

Willingness to pay for lung cancer treatment

OBJECTIVES

The increasing health-care cost of lung cancer treatment has caused debates regarding the reimbursement of new medications. The purpose of this study was to estimate patients' willingness to pay (WTP) for a hypothetical new drug.

METHODS

Patients with lung cancer were recruited through referrals by senior specialists from two medical centers in Taiwan. Double-bounded dichotomous choice questions and follow-up open-ended questions were employed to elicit patients' WTP. The contingent valuation question assumed that a novel medication was available, which provided a cure for lung cancer; however, patients would have to pay for this new cure out of their own pocket. In addition, the question was asked as to how much patients would be willing to pay for supplementary hospitalization insurance? Interval regression and linear regression were used to estimate the maximum WTP.

RESULTS

A total of 294 patients were recruited; their mean age was 67 years; 74% were male and 26% were female. The results show that patients were prepared to pay New Taiwan dollar (NTD) 7416 or NTD 7032 per month to purchase this new medication. Sex, religion, income, the Karnofsky Performance Scale score, and having family that takes care of you are significant factors influencing a patient's WTP.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients would like to pay less than the actual price of the new medication for their lung cancer. Thus government and health policymakers should consider the ability to pay when making their decision regarding the coverage of new drugs.

Population-based patterns and cost of management of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer after completion of chemotherapy until death

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to examine the patterns and costs of management of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after completion of chemotherapy until death in a population of patients in Manitoba, Canada.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Stage IIIB and IV NSCLC patients diagnosed between January 1997 and June 2000 who received chemotherapy as the primary treatment, completed their chemotherapy and survived for at least 28 days since their last treatment, and were on best supportive care (BSC) were selected. Treatment, services received, costs, and survival were determined by chart review and examining various databases including the Manitoba Cancer Registry, medical claims, hospitalizations, and prescription drugs. Costs of treatment, average cost per patient, and lifetime treatment costs were calculated.

RESULTS

Of the 2463 patients diagnosed with NSCLC over the study period, 150 patients matched our study criteria. From the beginning of the first chemotherapy treatment, the median survival time was 31.8 weeks, while from the date of BSC the median survival time was 13.8 weeks. The average cost per case was $10,805 from last date of chemotherapy and $8654 during the BSC period. The average cost per patient-month ranged from $1645 to $1792 in current prices. Lifetime treatment costs ranged from $8702 to $11,057. Hospitalizations accounted for 80% of the total treatment costs.

CONCLUSION

The largest overall component of cost after the end of chemotherapy was hospitalizations. Effective new therapies that reduce the episodes of hospitalizations would have a significant impact on decreasing aggregate costs.

Hospitalisation days in patients with lung cancer in a general population

BACKGROUND

Little is known concerning the hospitalisation of all lung cancer patients in a geographically defined population.

METHOD

All incident lung cancer patients in the Haugalandet area in South-west Norway from 1990 through 1996 were followed from diagnosis till either death or end of follow-up 1 December 2003. Initial symptoms, anatomical stage, functional performance status, histology, initial treatment, terminal care, number of admissions as well as days of hospitalisation were recorded.

RESULTS

Of a total of 271 patients (57 women) only 16 were still alive at end of follow-up. Median survival time was 170 days. Mean age at the first admission was 67.4 years (range 21-89 years). Median number (inter quartile range) of admissions was 3 (2, 5) and total hospitalisation days 35 (18, 58). Altogether 26% of the days in institutional care were spent in nursing homes. The 31 patients surgically treated had the highest number of hospitalisation days: 75 (56, 96). Young age, low anatomical stage and good performance status at time of diagnosis were associated with increased use of hospitalisation days. Cox regression analysis showed that treatment interventions and dyspnoea were significant predictors when adjusting for age, tumour stage and performance status.

CONCLUSION

In a population-based cohort of incident lung cancer patients, days in health care institutions involved a large part (19%) of all survival time for those who died. However, the absolute number was greater for those with small tumours and high functional performance status which initiated other interventions than palliative treatment.

Cost and outcomes of patients with solitary pulmonary nodules managed with PET scans

BACKGROUND

No prior study to our knowledge has observed the cost of managing solitary pulmonary nodules of patient groups defined by PET scan results.

METHODS

We combined study and administrative data over 2 years of follow-up.

RESULTS

Of 375 individuals with a definitive diagnosis, 54.4% had a malignant nodule and 62.1% had positive PET scan results. Mortality risk was 5.0 times higher (CI, 3.1-8.2) and cost was greater (50,233 dollars vs 22,461 dollars, P<.0001) among patients with malignant nodule. Mortality risk was 4.1 times higher (CI, 2.4-7.0) and cost was greater (47,823 dollars vs 20,744 dollars, P<.0001) among patients with a positive PET scan result. Among patients with a malignant nodule, 4.9% had a false-negative PET scan, but cost and survival were not different from true positives. Among patients with a benign nodule, 22.8% had a false-positive PET scan. These patients had greater cost (33,783 dollars vs 19,115 dollars, P<.01), more surgeries and biopsies, and 3.8 times the mortality risk (CI, 1.6-9.2) of true negatives. Just over one-half (54.5%) of individuals with positive PET scans received surgery. Most individuals with negative PET scans (85.2%) were managed by watchful waiting. They incurred fewer costs than patients with negative PET scans who were managed more aggressively (19,378 dollars vs 28,611 dollars, P<.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Management of solitary pulmonary nodules is expensive, especially if the nodule is malignant or if the PET scan result is false positive. Among patients with malignant nodules, 2-year survival is poor. Compared with true-positive PET scan results, false-negative results are not associated with lower costs or better outcomes.

Direct costs associated with the disease management of patients with unresectable advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in The Netherlands

INTRODUCTION

Disease management and costs of treatment of patients with unresectable advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in The Netherlands are not well known.

METHODS

A retrospective medical chart review was performed by collecting data from the time of diagnosis until the time of death or the end of the evaluation period. In addition to the demographic data, information was collected on the overall management of the patient. Hospital resource utilisation data collected included number of outpatient specialist visits, number and length of hospitalisation, type and number of diagnostic and laboratory procedures, type and number of radiotherapy cycles and detailed information on chemotherapy. To evaluate the economic impact of second-line treatment, a distinction was made between patients who received only best supportive care (BSC, group A) and those who received chemotherapy as a second-line treatment in addition to BSC (group B). The study was performed from the hospital perspective and reports on 2005 costs.

RESULTS

Of 102 patients, 74 belonged to group A and 28 to group B. Patient management included a multidisciplinary approach, the extent of which depended on symptoms of the disease and presence of metastases. The average total treatment cost per patient per year of unresectable advanced NSCLC in The Netherlands was euro32,840 in group A and euro31,187 in group B. In both groups, hospitalisation was the major cost driver. In group B second-line chemotherapy was the second largest contributor of the costs. In spite of the difference in numbers of treatment lines provided to patients in groups A and B the total average costs per patient per year were comparable. Overall, the management of unresectable advanced NSCLC appeared to conform with current guidelines in The Netherlands.

CONCLUSION

These patients show high medical resource consumption, with hospitalisation being the main cost driver in both groups. As economic arguments are becoming increasingly important in medical decision making on both national and local levels, this information is relevant for both policy makers and specialists. These data can also be used in future research to evaluate the economic impact of new therapies in NSCLC, especially of those that aim to treat patients in an outpatient setting.

Systematic review of multidisciplinary teams in the management of lung cancer

BACKGROUND

In several countries, clinical practice guidelines for lung cancer recommend that multidisciplinary (MD) teams should be used to plan the management of all lung cancer patients. We conducted a systematic review to evaluate and critically appraise the effectiveness of multidisciplinary teams for lung cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Medline searches were carried out for the period 1984 to July 2007. We included any study that mentioned team working among specialists with diagnostic and curative therapeutic intent, where members of the team met at a specified time, either in person or by video or teleconferencing, to discuss the diagnosis and management of patients with suspected lung cancer. All study designs were included. We were particularly interested in whether multidisciplinary working improved survival but also considered other outcomes such as practice patterns and waiting times.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies met the criteria for inclusion. Statistical pooling was not possible due to clinical heterogeneity. Only two of the primary studies reported an improvement in survival. Both were before-and-after designs, providing weak evidence of a causal association. Evidence of the effect of MD teams was stronger for changing patient management than for affecting survival. Six of the studies reported an increase in the percentage of patients undergoing surgical resection or an increase in the percentage of patients undergoing chemotherapy or radiotherapy with curative intent.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review shows limited evidence linking MD teams with improved lung cancer survival. This does not mean that MD teams do not improve survival, merely that currently available evidence of this is limited. It seems intuitively obvious that MD teams should improve outcomes for lung cancer patients, but there are difficulties in conducting randomised trials to show this. The best way forward would be prospective evaluation of the effectiveness of MD teams as they are implemented, paying particular attention to collecting data on potential confounders.

Factors influencing hospital costs of lung cancer patients in Northern Ireland

Lung cancer is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. In this paper, the hospital costs incurred by 724 lung cancer patients diagnosed in 2001 were determined by review of case notes. These represented all patients diagnosed with lung cancer in Northern Ireland on whom data existed in that year. Total hospital costs in the 12 months from presentation for the 724 patients were 3.99 million pounds. Average patient costs were 5,956 pounds for patients diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer and 5,876 pounds for those with small cell lung cancer. The main component of cost was inpatient stay, representing between 62 and 84% of costs depending on cell type. Multivariate analyses revealed significant differences in cost related to staging, co-morbidities, age, and deprivation. Total annual hospital costs were 13 times as high as the estimated enforcement cost of the smoke-free legislation in Northern Ireland.

Informal caregiving burden in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: the HABIT study

INTRODUCTION

This study's aim was to assess economic data regarding the home assistance burden for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients in Italy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred four NSCLC patients in second-line chemotherapy (2LC) or in supportive therapy (ST) were enrolled in 18 Italian oncology departments and were observed for 3 months. The main caregiver's workload was assessed monthly by a task scale; other caregivers' activities were also registered. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status was assessed by physicians, and patients completed the Lung Cancer Symptoms (LCS) subscale. Formal caregiving time was valued according to market prices; informal caregiving hours were valued using the wage rate for an equivalent service. Covariance analysis was performed to check for influential factors in assistance costs.

RESULTS

The mean age of the total sample was 65.5 years, and prevalence of males was over 80%. In over 70% of cases, the principal caregiver was patient's spouse, living with the patient and not working. Principal caregiver support was the main cost item: 2.368 euros in 2LC and 2.805 euros in ST, representing 74% of total trimonthly assistance costs. Regression analysis showed a positive correlation between the severity of symptoms and the costs of assistance. The caregiving burden was higher in patients with bone and/or cerebral metastases; other metastasis sites seemed to have no impact on assistance costs.

CONCLUSION

Considering quality of life as the ultimate health outcome, clinicians are challenged to contribute to a research and policy agenda that holds burden of care in due consideration.

Economic impact of gefitinib for refractory non-small-cell lung cancer: a Markov model-based analysis

Few data are available on the economics of target therapy or refractory non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

OBJECTIVE

To determine the mean global management costs (MC) per patient treated with gefitinib for NSCLC, and the costs of the different management phases.

METHOD

A Markov approach was used to model treatment costs in a cohort of 106 patients treated with gefitinib as part of a compassionate-use program (third-line treatment) in six public-sector teaching hospitals. The economic analysis adopted the health care payer's perspective, and only direct costs were taken into account.

RESULTS

The mean duration of gefitinib treatment was 4.6 +/- 5.8 months (1-29 months); median survival was 4 months, 1-year and 2-year survival rates were 12.3% and 4.7%, respectively. The mean total management cost was 39,979 euros +/- 20,279. The model showed that first- and second-line treatments accounted for respectively 29.5% and 44.1% of this cost, while gefitinib periods represented 10.7%, periods of remission 1.25%, and terminal care 14.5%. A sensitivity analysis showed that the price of gefitinib had little influence on the total cost.

CONCLUSION

The cost of third-line gefitinib therapy for NSCLC appears acceptable from the healthcare payer's perspective, but this needs to be confirmed in dedicated cost-effectiveness studies.

[Lung cancer diagnosis: hospitalization costs]

OBJECTIVE

To establish the direct costs of the process of diagnosing lung cancer in 2003. As a secondary objective, the cost of admissions defined as inappropriate was evaluated.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A prospective cohort study of lung cancer cases diagnosed in 2003 was performed. Diagnosis was based on cytohistology or clinical and radiological criteria. The total cost was determined according to Decree 222/2003, governing Galician health service rates. A distinction was drawn between hospitalized patients and outpatients, and between small cell and non-small cell carcinomas. Inappropriate admissions were analyzed in accordance with the criteria established by our study team, and the savings that would have been made had these patients been treated as outpatients were calculated. The statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 10.0.

RESULTS

A total of 160 patients were diagnosed with lung cancer; 76 (47.5%) of these were outpatients, and the remaining 84 (52.5%) were hospitalized patients. Admissions were considered inappropriate in 27 cases. Of the total of 160 patients, 108 were diagnosed as having non-small cell carcinomas, and 38 as having small cell carcinomas; the remaining 14 patients were diagnosed on the basis of clinical-radiological criteria. Total cost was 742,847 Euro(mean, 4643 Euro; 95% confidence interval, 4049-5236 Euro), composed of 552,614 Euro(mean, 6579 Euro) for admitted patients, and 190,233 Euro(mean, 2503 Euro) for outpatients. Mean cost was 3692 Euro for the small cell carcinomas, and 5070 Euro for the non-small cell carcinomas. Comparing limited and extensive small cell carcinomas, the mean cost for the former was significantly lower than for the latter (1894 Euro compared to 4098 Euro); there was also a lower mean cost for early compared to advanced stages of non-small cell carcinomas (3660 Euro compared to 5494 Euro). The savings to be made from unnecessary admissions were calculated at 120,258 Euro.

CONCLUSIONS

The mean cost for outpatient lung cancer treatment was 62% lower than for hospitalization. Non-small cell carcinomas were more costly on average than small cell carcinomas, and advanced stages of the small cell carcinomas involved a higher average cost than the initial stages of the disease. For our series, the savings to be made from unnecessary admissions were calculated at 120,258 Euro.

Retrospective economic and outcomes analyses using non-US databases: a review

Retrospective database analyses pose a series of methodological challenges, some of which are unique to their data sources, particularly in countries outside the US. This study aimed to qualitatively review the methodological challenges of using non-US databases to conduct retrospective economic and outcomes research studies. We conducted a MEDLINE search to obtain a sample of literature published after the year 2000 on retrospective analyses using non-US databases. We reviewed all relevant components of the selected articles in accordance with the checklist proposed for retrospective database studies by the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) Task Force and identified issues found in the data sources, methods, study designs, statistics and sources of possible threats to internal and external validity. We found a wide variation in the quality of studies in terms of outcome definitions, patient selection criteria, data collection methods, sample sizes, risk adjustment methods, potential measurement errors and external validity of the studies. Few economic studies included information on indirect cost components because of a lack of relevant data. The quality of non-US retrospective database analyses varied. Future such analyses may be improved if researchers implement the checklist developed by the ISPOR Task Force on Retrospective Database Studies.

[Medico economic analysis in first line chemotherapy in advanced lung cancer]

Our objective was to analyse economic consequences modifying first line chemotherapy in treatment non small cell lung cancer IIIB-IV. Therefore a cost minimisation has been performed. Resources consumption were collected in a Pneumology department for 21 patients receiving previously mitomycine-ifosfamide-platin and for the 21 first patients receiving vinorelbine-platin, new patients diagnosed during year 2001. Costs were derived from hospital accounting system, economic analysis performed from the hospital and from the health French system points of view. Activity Synthetic Index point decrease of 2.9% per patient in vinorelbine-platin versus mitomycine-ifosfamide-platin, as an increase of 64.6% of hospital drug spending is registered (1,893 Euro versus 1,150 Euro) and an over cost of 15.7% for health French system (14179 Euro versus 12,257 Euro). Whatever the perspective of economic analysis, vinorelbine-platin arm is dominated by the mitomycine-ifosfamide-platin arm.

Routine once-weekly darbepoetin alfa administration is cost-effective in lung cancer patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia: A Markov analysis

BACKGROUND

Despite the clinical efficacy of recombinant human erythropoietin (RHE) on chemotherapy-induced anemia, most cost-effectiveness studies have given unfavorable results.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the cost of managing anemia in unselected patients receiving chemotherapy for lung cancer, and the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of RHE.

METHOD

We constructed Markov models of two cohorts of patients who received (n=94) or did not receive (n=89) darbepoetin (one weekly injection when the hemoglobin level fell below 11 g/dl), focusing on changes in hemoglobin levels, transfusion requirements, anemia management costs, and the cost-effectiveness ratios of the two management strategies.

RESULTS

The use of RHE significantly reduced the proportion of patients needing transfusions (from 33.6% to 19.1%, p<0.05) and the number of red cell units used by transfusion (from 2.97+/-1.47 to 2.11+/-0.47, p<0.01). Markov modeling showed that the RHE strategy significantly increased the mean Hb level (13+/-0.5 g/dl versus 11.9+/-1g/dl, p<0.001), at the price of an increase in the main cost (respectively, US$ 1732+/-897 and 996+/-643; p<0.01). The cost-effectiveness ratio favored the RHE strategy (7.02 versus 9.04). Sensitivity analysis showed that the RHE strategy remained dominant in most situations.

CONCLUSION

Routine use of RHE appears to be cost-effective in patients receiving chemotherapy for lung cancer.

Clinical benefit of zoledronic acid in patients with lung cancer and other solid tumors: analysis based on history of skeletal complications

The results of a retrospective exploratory analysis of a phase III trial of zoledronic acid in patients with bone metastases secondary to lung cancer or other solid tumors are reported herein to assess the risk of skeletal-related events (SREs) and the efficacy of 4 mg zoledronic acid compared with placebo. The study is based on patient SRE history before study entry. Patients were stratified based on SRE history (eg, pathologic fracture, spinal cord compression, radiation therapy or surgery to bone, or hypercalcemia) before study entry, and SRE incidence over 21 months was analyzed. Of 507 patients randomized to 4 mg zoledronic acid or placebo, 131 completed the 9-month core phase and 69 entered the 12-month extension phase. Before study entry, 347 of 503 patients who were evaluable for efficacy (69%) experienced >/= 1 SRE; these patients had a higher risk of developing an SRE on study than patients with no prior SRE (odds ratio, 1.41). Among patients with an SRE before study entry, zoledronic acid reduced the risk of SREs by 31% (P = 0.009), reduced the mean skeletal morbidity rate (1.96 vs. 2.81 SREs per year for placebo; P = 0.030), and prolonged the median time to first SRE by nearly 4 months (215 days vs. 106 days for placebo; P = 0.011). Among patients with no SRE before study entry (n = 156), zoledronic acid reduced the risk of SREs by 23% (P = 0.308), reduced the mean skeletal morbidity rate (1.34 vs. 2.53 SREs per year for placebo; P = 0.332), and prolonged the median time to first SRE by 2.5 months (P = 0.534). This exploratory analysis demonstrates that patients with a history of SREs are at high risk for subsequent SREs, but zoledronic acid reduces skeletal morbidity regardless of SRE history.