1
|
Wu R, Ma L. BeEAM (Bendamustine, Etoposide, Cytarabine, Melphalan) Versus BEAM (Carmustine, Etoposide, Cytarabine, Melphalan) as Conditioning Regimen Before Autologous Haematopoietic Cell Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cell Transplant 2023; 32:9636897231179364. [PMID: 37350429 PMCID: PMC10291416 DOI: 10.1177/09636897231179364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2023] [Revised: 05/03/2023] [Accepted: 05/16/2023] [Indexed: 06/24/2023] Open
Abstract
High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is a standard of care for selected patients with refractory/relapsed Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), and it is also used as first-line clinical consolidation option for some aggressive NHL subtypes. Conditioning regimen prior to ASCT is one of the essential factors related with clinical outcomes post transplant. The conditioning regimen of carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan (BEAM) traditionally is considered the standard of care for patients with lymphoma who are eligible for transplantation. Replacement of carmustine with bendamustine (BeEAM) was described as an alternative conditioning regimen in the autograft setting for patients with lymphoma. Several studies have reported inconsistent clinical outcomes comparing BeEAM and BEAM. Therefore, in the lack of well-designed prospective comparative studies, the comparison of BeEAM versus BEAM is based on retrospective trials. To compare the clinical outcomes between BeEAM and BEAM, we performed a meta-analysis of 10 studies which compared the outcomes between BeEAM and BEAM in patients autografted for lymphoma disease (HL or NHL). We searched article titles and compared transplantation with BeEAM versus BEAM in MEDLINE (PubMed), Cochrane library, and EMBASE database. Here, we report the results of nine main endpoints in our meta-analysis comparing BeEAM and BEAM, including neutrophil engraftment (NE), platelet engraftment (PE), overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), non-relapse mortality (NRM), relapse rate (RR), grade 3 mucositis, renal toxicity, and cardiotoxicity. We discovered that the BeEAM regimen was associated with a slightly better PFS [pooled odds ratio (OR) of 0.70, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.52-0.94, P = 0.02], lower RR (0.49, 95% CI, 0.31-0.76, P = 0.002), higher mucositis (3.43, 95% CI, 2.29-5.16, P = 0.001), renal toxicity (4.49, 95% CI, 2.68-7.51, P = 0.001), and cardiotoxicity (1.88, 95% CI, 1.03-3.40, P = 0.03). We also discovered that the two groups had equivalent NE (pooled WMD -0.64, 95% CI, -1.46 to 0.18, P = 0.13), PE (pooled WMD -0.3, 95% CI, -1.68 to 2.28, P = 0.77), OS (0.73, 95% CI, 0.52-1.01, P = 0.07), and NRM (1.51, 95% CI, 0.76-2.98, P = 0.24). The results of this meta-analysis show that the BeEAM regimen is a viable alternative to BEAM. More prospective comparisons between BeEAM and BEAM are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ran Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Liyuan Ma
- Department of Hematology, Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cryopreserved versus non-cryopreserved stem cell autografts in multiple myeloma a restrospective cohort study. Bone Marrow Transplant 2022; 57:1313-1318. [PMID: 35637267 DOI: 10.1038/s41409-022-01718-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2021] [Revised: 04/28/2022] [Accepted: 05/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
The use of non-cryopreserved hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) can be an alternative to the traditional cryopreserved infusions of HSCs in autologous stem cell transplantation (aHSCT). After high-dose melphalan conditioning (HDM), we sought to compare time to engraftment, overall survival, and safety in multiple myeloma (MM) patients undergoing a first aHSCT after high-dose melphalan conditioning (HDM). We conducted a cohort study from March 2018 to December 2019. Of all autologous transplants performed during this period, 105 were for MM as the first consolidation. Fifty-one patients received a cryopreserved graft; the remaining 54 patients received a fresh infusion. General clinical characteristics were similar between these two groups. Cell viability was higher in non-cryopreserved grafts (95% vs. 86% p < 0.01). Four deaths occurred during hospitalization in the cryopreserved group, one in the non-cryopreserved group. The cumulative incidence of neutrophil and platelet engraftment on D + 25 was higher in the non-cryopreserved compared to the cryopreserved group (98% vs 90% p < 0.01 and 96.2% vs 72.54% p < 0.01 respectively). Additionally, the hospital length of stay was reduced by 4 days for patients for the non-cryopreserved cohort. In summary, the use of non-cryopreserved HSCs after HDM is safe and effective compared to patients who received a cryopreserved graft.
Collapse
|
3
|
Lo AC, James LP, Prica A, Raymakers A, Peacock S, Qu M, Louie AV, Savage KJ, Sehn L, Hodgson D, Yang JC, Eich HTT, Wirth A, Hunink MGM. Positron-emission tomography-based staging is cost-effective in early-stage follicular lymphoma. J Nucl Med 2021; 63:543-548. [PMID: 34413148 PMCID: PMC8973292 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.121.262324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2021] [Revised: 07/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The objective was to assess the cost-effectiveness of staging PET/CT in early-stage follicular lymphoma (FL) from the Canadian health-care system perspective. Methods: The study population was FL patients staged as early-stage using conventional CT imaging and planned for curative-intent radiation therapy (RT). A decision analytic model simulated the management after adding staging PET/CT versus using staging CT alone. In the no-PET/CT strategy, all patients proceeded to curative-intent RT as planned. In the PET/CT strategy, PET/CT information could result in an increased RT volume, switching to a noncurative approach, or no change in RT treatment as planned. The subsequent disease course was described using a state-transition cohort model over a 30-y time horizon. Diagnostic characteristics, probabilities, utilities, and costs were derived from the literature. Baseline analysis was performed using quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), costs (2019 Canadian dollars), and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. Deterministic sensitivity analyses were conducted, evaluating net monetary benefit at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000/QALY. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis using 10,000 simulations was performed. Costs and QALYs were discounted at a rate of 1.5%. Results: In the reference case scenario, staging PET/CT was the dominant strategy, resulting in an average lifetime cost saving of $3,165 and a gain of 0.32 QALYs. In deterministic sensitivity analyses, the PET/CT strategy remained the preferred strategy for all scenarios supported by available data. In probabilistic sensitivity analysis, the PET/CT strategy was strongly dominant in 77% of simulations (i.e., reduced cost and increased QALYs) and was cost-effective in 89% of simulations (i.e., either saved costs or had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio below $100,000/QALY). Conclusion: Our analysis showed that the use of PET/CT to stage early-stage FL patients reduces cost and improves QALYs. Patients with early-stage FL should undergo PET/CT before curative-intent RT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Melody Qu
- London Health Sciences Centre, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | - Joanna C Yang
- University of California, San Francisco, United States
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Plerixafor in poor mobilizers with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a multi-center time-motion analysis. Bone Marrow Transplant 2017; 53:246-254. [PMID: 29255168 DOI: 10.1038/s41409-017-0033-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2017] [Revised: 09/17/2017] [Accepted: 10/05/2017] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
High-dose chemotherapy alongside peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) infusion has become the standard of care in different hematologic malignancies. The goal of PBSC mobilization is to allow collection of sufficient CD34+ cells to proceed to transplantation. The current mobilization regimen with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), alone or in combination with chemotherapy, still fails in 10-25% of patients. Plerixafor is able to rescue most of these patients from mobilization failure. In this study, we investigated the impact of plerixafor on the cost and time spent on apheresis in patients who were considered poor mobilizers, with <20 × 106/µl peripheral CD34+ cells after mobilization but prior to apheresis. Patient hospital records from ten centers in three European countries were reviewed and compared during two time periods, namely prior and after plerixafor introduction to the market. During the plerixafor period, patients spent less time on apheresis (350 vs. 461 min). Poor mobilizers given plerixafor collected more CD34+ cells during the first apheresis session, leading to a decrease in the average number of apheresis sessions needed. The total apheresis yield was unaffected. This analysis shows that the use of plerixafor lessens the time-effort associated with the management of poor mobilizers and reduces apheresis costs.
Collapse
|
5
|
Prica A, Chan K, Cheung M. Frontline rituximab monotherapy induction versus a watch and wait approach for asymptomatic advanced-stage follicular lymphoma: A cost-effectiveness analysis. Cancer 2015; 121:2637-45. [PMID: 25877511 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.29372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2014] [Revised: 02/03/2015] [Accepted: 02/03/2015] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A watch and wait (WW) strategy is the standard of care for patients with asymptomatic advanced-stage follicular lymphoma. Recent data have demonstrated an improvement in the time to progression with rituximab induction (RI) with or without rituximab maintenance (RM) in comparison with a WW strategy wait in such patients. It remains unclear whether this is a cost-effective strategy. METHODS A Markov decision analysis model was developed to compare the clinical outcomes, costs, and cost-effectiveness of RI (4 weekly doses) plus RM (12 doses every 2 months), RI (4 weekly doses), and a WW strategy for patients newly diagnosed with low-burden, asymptomatic advanced-stage follicular lymphoma over a lifetime horizon. Baseline probabilities and utilities were derived from a systematic review of published studies, and they were evaluated on a 6-month cycle. A Canadian public health payer's perspective was adopted, and costs were presented in 2012 Canadian dollars. RESULTS RI was the cheapest strategy. It was less costly at $59,953 versus $67,489 for the RM arm and $75,895 for the WW arm. It was also associated with a slightly lower quality-adjusted life expectancy at 6.16 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) versus 6.28 QALYs for the RM strategy but was superior to WW (5.71 QALYs). In sensitivity analyses of key variables, this effectiveness was sensitive to the probability of first and second progression in the RI arm, and this indicated relatively neutral effectiveness between the 2 rituximab arms. CONCLUSIONS RI without maintenance for asymptomatic advanced-stage follicular lymphoma is the preferred strategy: it minimizes costs per patient over a lifetime horizon.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anca Prica
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Kelvin Chan
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Matthew Cheung
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Pierelli L, Berto P, Accorsi P, Milone G, Lopatriello S, Aiello A, Iacopino P, Olivieri A, Rambaldi A, Bosi A. The costs of mobilisation and collection of peripheral blood stem cells in multiple myeloma and lymphoma in an European country: results from The Gruppo Italiano Trapianto Midollo Osseo (GITMO) and Società Italiana di Emaferesi e Manipolazione Cellulare (SIdEM) survey. Transfus Apher Sci 2013; 49:615-22. [PMID: 23973731 DOI: 10.1016/j.transci.2013.07.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2013] [Revised: 07/12/2013] [Accepted: 07/26/2013] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
Scarce information is available about the cost of mobilisation/collection of peripheral blood stem cells for patients undergoing autologous transplant for relapsed Lymphoma or Multiple Myeloma. This paper reports the consumption of resources and costs collected through a survey among Italian Centres who adhere to the GITMO and SIdEM scientific societies. General transplant information was extracted from the European Promise database. Resources used alongside the phases of mobilisation/collection were retrieved. Resources for each of the process phases were quantified and averaged across centres and a unit cost value was attributed, based on administrative data from 3 centres, tariffs and market values. 25/89 Centres (34% of 2009 Promise transplants) provided data according to their standard practice. The mean cost/patient of the process of cell mobilisation/collection was € 6830 ± 1802 for Multiple Myeloma and € 7304 ± 1542 for Lymphoma. The organisational path for PBSC mobilisation/collection appears complex and cumbersome, spread amongst different treatment settings, with many different healthcare professionals being involved and considerable amounts of time and resources being currently dedicated to the management of patients requiring autologous transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Pierelli
- Servizio di Immunoematologia e Trasfusionale, Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo-Forlanini and Università di Roma-La Sapienza, Roma, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Preussler JM, Denzen EM, Majhail NS. Costs and cost-effectiveness of hematopoietic cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2012; 18:1620-8. [PMID: 22484549 PMCID: PMC3678555 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2012.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2012] [Accepted: 04/02/2012] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Interest is growing in economic and comparative effectiveness analyses, with increasing emphasis on optimizing healthcare resources and costs. Limited information is available on the economic aspects of hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). We review contemporary literature on the costs and cost-effectiveness of HCT in the United States and worldwide. Published studies confirm the high costs associated with HCT, although the reported costs are highly variable, related to the differing methodologies used across studies. We examine the challenges in reviewing costs and cost-effectiveness across studies specific to HCT and highlight factors identified as associated with higher costs of HCT. We also discuss opportunities for future research in this area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaime M. Preussler
- Health Services Research Program, National Marrow Donor Program, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Ellen M. Denzen
- Health Services Research Program, National Marrow Donor Program, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Navneet S. Majhail
- Health Services Research Program, National Marrow Donor Program, Minneapolis, Minnesota
- Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Martis N, Gisselbrecht C, Mounier N. Quality of life following treatment for B-cell lymphoma. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2011; 11:523-32. [PMID: 21958097 DOI: 10.1586/erp.11.40] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Clinical outcome for B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma has been greatly improved through the combination of new treatment options, in particular noncytotoxic drugs that specifically target disease mechanisms. Furthermore, in many cases, lymphoma survivors have to cope with long-term toxicity. Therefore, as with survival and remission length, the assessment of quality of life (QoL) is a major consideration when judging therapeutic benefit in patients. The aim of this article is to discuss the impact of widespread treatments on QoL and the relevance of QoL assessment in B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in day-to-day clinical practice. Additional studies of QoL in the general population, the associations between QoL and treatment strategy, QoL and specific situations (i.e., stem-cell transplantation and aging population) are also considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nihal Martis
- Service d'Onco-Hématologie, Hôpital de l'Archet, Nice, France
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Heutte N, Haioun C, Feugier P, Coiffier B, Tilly H, Ferme C, Gabarre J, Morschhauser F, Gisselbrecht C, Mounier N. Quality of life in 269 patients with poor-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with rituximab versus observation after autologous stem cell transplant. Leuk Lymphoma 2011; 52:1239-48. [PMID: 21463114 DOI: 10.3109/10428194.2011.566951] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
We aimed to assess quality of life (QoL) following front-line autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) and the QoL relationship with rituximab maintenance, in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Patients were then randomized to either one weekly rituximab injection for 4 weeks, or observation alone. Patients (n = 269) were given the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 questionnaires. Scales for all symptoms exhibited similar temporal patterns, with a marked increase, followed by a plateau after 1 year. The proportion of patients with a clinically significant improvement varied from 6% (constipation) to 56% (fatigue). Age, gender, and previous treatment-induced toxicities were not predictive of variations in QoL. Rituximab significantly reduced pain and symptom severity. Our results for QoL showed that patients experienced rapid recovery after ASCT in all the domains tested. Differences in QoL improvement with time were not connected with rituximab maintenance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natacha Heutte
- Department of Statistics, Université de Caen-Basse Normandie, Caen, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|