Quality-of-life assessment in phase III clinical trials of gemcitabine in non-small-cell lung cancer

Interferon-inducer antivirals: Potential candidates to combat COVID-19

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an infective disease generated by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Given the pandemic urgency and lack of an effective cure for this disease, drug repurposing could open the way for finding a solution. Lots of investigations are ongoing to test the compounds already identified as antivirals. On the other hand, induction of type I interferons are found to play an important role in the generation of immune responses against SARS-CoV-2. Therefore, it was opined that the antivirals capable of triggering the interferons and their signaling pathway, could rationally be beneficial for treating COVID-19. On this basis, using a database of antivirals, called drugvirus, some antiviral agents were derived, followed by searches on their relevance to interferon induction. The examined list included drugs from different categories such as antibiotics, immunosuppressants, anti-cancers, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID), calcium channel blocker compounds, and some others. The results as briefed here, could help in finding potential drug candidates for COVID-19 treatment. However, their advantages and risks should be taken into account through precise studies, considering a systemic approach. Even though the adverse effects of some of these drugs may overweight their benefits, considering their mechanisms and structures may give a clue for designing novel drugs in the future. Furthermore, the antiviral effect and IFN-modifying mechanisms possessed by some of these drugs might lead to a synergistic effect against SARS-CoV-2, which deserve to be evaluated in further investigations.

Gemcitabine Mechanism of Action Confounds Early Assessment of Treatment Response by 3'-Deoxy-3'-[18F]Fluorothymidine in Preclinical Models of Lung Cancer

3'-Deoxy-3'-[18F]fluorothymidine positron emission tomography ([18F]FLT-PET) and diffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI) are promising approaches to monitor tumor therapy response. Here, we employed these two imaging modalities to evaluate the response of lung carcinoma xenografts in mice after gemcitabine therapy. Caliper measurements revealed that H1975 xenografts responded to gemcitabine treatment, whereas A549 growth was not affected. In both tumor models, uptake of [18F]FLT was significantly reduced 6 hours after drug administration. On the basis of the gemcitabine concentration and [18F]FLT excretion measured, this was presumably related to a direct competition of gemcitabine with the radiotracer for cellular uptake. On day 1 after therapy, [18F]FLT uptake was increased in both models, which was correlated with thymidine kinase 1 (TK1) expression. Two and 3 days after drug administration, [18F]FLT uptake as well as TK1 and Ki67 expression were unchanged. A reduction in [18F]FLT in the responsive H1975 xenografts could only be noted on day 5 of therapy. Changes in ADCmean in A549 xenografts 1 or 2 days after gemcitabine did not seem to be of therapy-related biological relevance as they were not related to cell death (assessed by caspase-3 IHC and cellular density) or tumor therapy response. Taken together, in these models, early changes of [18F]FLT uptake in tumors reflected mechanisms, such as competing gemcitabine uptake or gemcitabine-induced thymidylate synthase inhibition, and only reflected growth-inhibitory effects at a later time point. Hence, the time point for [18F]FLT-PET imaging of tumor response to gemcitabine is of crucial importance. Cancer Res; 76(24); 7096-105. ©2016 AACR.