Assessing a pharmacist-run anaemia educational programme for patients with chronic renal insufficiency

OBJECTIVE

Assessment of a pharmacist-run anaemia educational programme for patients with chronic renal insufficiency.

SETTING

Nephrology Department, Grenoble Hospital, France.

METHOD

A 12-week prospective study, using a before-after intervention design. Included in the study were predialysis outpatients with a haemoglobin level < 10 g/dl, de novo EPO prescription; judged qualified by the nephrologist for self-injections; accepting self-injections. The intervention was a single one-hour individual session between the pharmacist and the patient to target (1) medical and therapeutic information; (2) information on the device, a pen used with a cartridge of beta epoietin; (3) training with the pen; and (4) self-injection of the first dose by the patient, in front of the pharmacist. Main outcome measures were knowledge (7-item questionnaire); handling skills (observation) and Quality of Life (1 Likert scale on apprehension towards self-injections and 3 Linear Analog Scales on energy, daily activities, and general well-being); compliance (self-report on self-administered injections) and haemoglobin level.

RESULTS

Ten patients were followed for 3 months after intervention. The evolution of the knowledge was positive but not statistically significant after the programme (80% of good answers before; 93% 3 months later). Concerning the patients' skills, difficulties with the pen were important at inclusion, (1) to reset the pen into zero position (2.8 tries/patient +/- 1.8); (2) to insert a new cartridge (1.9 +/- 1.1); and (3) to take air out of the cartridge (2.3 +/- 1.2). After the session, results were satisfactory, since 3 months later, all patients were still on self-injections. QoL improved significantly over the study period respectively on energy, daily activities, and general well-being. The mean level of compliance remained above 90% at 3 months for 8 out of 10 patients. Patients reached the haemoglobin target value of 11 g/dl during the second month of treatment.

CONCLUSION

A tailored educational programme conducted by a pharmacist is beneficial for anaemia patients with chronic renal insufficiency. The programme seems to result in a high level of compliance, leading to an optimal haemoglobin level within two months.

Achieving therapeutic targets in renal anaemia: considering cost-efficacy

Erythropoietin treatment for anaemia in chronic kidney disease (CKD) brings important clinical benefits, but restricted healthcare budgets necessitate value-for-money therapies, requiring economic considerations also to be taken into account when selecting a treatment regimen. Subcutaneous (s.c.) administration of epoetin is effective at a lower dose than intravenous (i.v.) administration, offering the potential for substantial reductions in costs of treatment. Unlike epoetin alfa, which is contra-indicated by the s.c. route in Europe in patients with CKD, epoetin beta (NeoRecormon) can be safely and effectively given by either route. The multidose presentations of epoetin beta (Reco-Pen, multidose vials) may provide further opportunity for dose reduction. The tolerability of s.c. epoetin beta is excellent and superior compared with epoetin alfa or darbepoetin alfa. Epoetin beta given once weekly is as effective as two- or three-times weekly, and the dosing frequency can be further reduced to once every 2 weeks in patients who are stable on once-weekly dosing. Reduced dosing frequency is more convenient for the patient and may save nursing time in dialysis units. Overall, s.c. epoetin beta, compared with alternative treatments, may represent a cost-effective treatment option for anaemia management as it combines a well-established safety and efficacy record, favourable local tolerability, and the convenience of once-weekly dosing with the potential to reduce treatment costs by up to 30%.

Follitropin-beta administered by pen device has superior local tolerance compared with follitropin-alpha administered by conventional syringe

A receiver- and assessor-blind, randomized, single-centre, crossover study was performed in 60 healthy women volunteers, to compare the local tolerance of two recombinant FSH preparations administered by a pen device (delivering 150 IU follitropin-beta) or by conventional syringe (delivering 150 IU follitropin-alpha). Volunteers were randomized to one of two treatment sequences: pen device followed by conventional syringe, or the reverse. Each preparation was injected once, subcutaneously in the umbilical region and local tolerance reactions were assessed within 5 min, at 1 and 24 h after each administration. In addition, subjects were asked to rate the pain experienced during a period of 24 h after each injection by means of a visual analogue scale (VAS). At administration (within 5 min), severe to moderate pain was experienced in 70.0% of subjects injected by the conventional syringe, whereas only 21.7% of subjects treated with the pen device experienced pain. This difference was highly significant (P </= 0.001). The overall pain score (VAS) was low but significantly lower in subjects treated with the pen device (P </= 0.01). In this study, follitropin-beta administered by the pen device was far less painful than follitropin-alpha administered by conventional syringe. The pen device is the first multiple-use device available for the self-administration of recombinant FSH (rFSH) during ovarian stimulation for assisted reproduction.