Long-acting beta 2-adrenoceptor agonists and exercise-induced asthma: lessons to guide us in the future

Repurposing drugs as inhaled therapies in asthma

For the first 40 years of the 20th century treatment for asthma occurred in response to an asthma attack. The treatments were given by injection or orally and included the adrenergic agonists adrenalin/epinephrine and ephedrine and a phosphodiesterase inhibitor theophylline. Epinephrine became available as an aerosol in 1930. After 1945, isoprenaline, a non-selective beta agonist, became available for oral use but it was most widely used by inhalation. Isoprenaline was short-acting with unwanted cardiac effects. More selective beta agonists, with a longer duration of action and fewer side-effects became available, including orciprenaline in 1967, salbutamol in 1969 and terbutaline in 1970. The inhaled steroid beclomethasone was available by 1972 and budesonide by 1982. Spirometry alone and in response to exercise was used to assess efficacy and duration of action of these drugs for the acute benefits of beta₂ agonists and the chronic benefits of corticosteroids. Early studies comparing oral and aerosol beta₂ agonists found equivalence in bronchodilator effect but the aerosol treatment was superior in preventing exercise-induced bronchoconstriction. Inhaled drugs are now widely used including the long-acting beta₂ agonists, salmeterol and formoterol, and the corticosteroids, fluticasone, ciclesonide, mometasone and triamcinolone, that act locally and have low systemic bio-availability. Repurposing drugs as inhaled therapies permitted direct delivery of low doses of drug to the site of action reducing the incidence of unwanted side-effects and permitting the prophylactic treatment of asthma.

Intensity of swimming exercise influences tracheal reactivity in rats

Studies that evaluate the mechanisms for increased airway responsiveness are very sparse, although there are reports of exercise-induced bronchospasm. Therefore, we have evaluated the tracheal reactivity and the rate of lipid peroxidation after different intensities of swimming exercise in rats. Thus, male Wistar rats (age 8 weeks; 250–300 g) underwent a forced swimming exercise for 1 h whilst carrying attached loads of 3, 4, 5, 6 and 8% of their body weight (groups G3, G4, G5, G6 and G8, respectively; n=5 each). Immediately after the test, the trachea of each rat was removed and suspended in an organ bath to evaluate contractile and relaxant responses. The rate of lipid peroxidation was estimated by measuring malondialdehyde levels. According to a one-way ANOVA, all trained groups showed a significant decrease in the relaxation induced by aminophylline (10⁻¹²–10⁻¹ M) (pD2=3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.3 and 3.2, respectively for G3, G4, G5, G6 and G8) compared to the control group (pD2=4.6) and the E_max values of G5, G6, G8 groups were reduced by 94.2, 88.0 and 77.0%, respectively. Additionally, all trained groups showed a significant increase in contraction induced by carbachol (10⁻⁹–10⁻³ M) (pD2=6.0, 6.5, 6.5, 7.2 and 7.3, respectively for G3, G4, G5, G6 and G8) compared to the control group (pD2=5.7). Lipid peroxidation levels of G3, G4 and G5 were similar in both the trachea and lung, however G6 and G8 presented an increased peroxidation in the trachea. In conclusion, a single bout of swimming exercise acutely altered tracheal responsiveness in an intensity-related manner and the elevation in lipid peroxidation indicates a degree of oxidative stress involvement.

Dyspneic athlete

Breathing concerns in athletes are common and can be due to a wide variety of pathology. The most common etiologies are exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) and paradoxic vocal fold movement disorder (PVFMD). Although some patients may have both, PVFMD is often misdiagnosed as EIB, which can lead to unnecessary treatment. The history and physical exam are important to rule out life threatening pulmonary and cardiac causes as well as common conditions such as gastroesophageal reflux disease, sinusitis, and allergic etiologies. The history and physical exam have been shown to be not as vital in diagnosing EIB and PVFMD. Improvement in diagnostic testing with office base spirometry, bronchoprovocation testing, eucapnic voluntary hyperpnea (EVH) and video laryngoscopy are essential in properly diagnosing these conditions. Accurate diagnosis leads to proper management, which is essential to avoid unnecessary testing and save healthcare costs. Also important to the physician treating dyspnea in athletes is knowing regulations on medications, drug testing, and proper documentation needed for certain organizations. The differential diagnosis of dyspnea is broad and is not limited to EIB and PVFMD. Ruling out life threatening cardiac and pulmonary causes with a proper history, physical, and appropriate testing is essential. The purpose of this review is to highlight recent literature on the diagnosis and management of EIB and PVFMD as well as discuss other potential causes for dyspnea in the athlete.

Special considerations for adolescent athletic and asthmatic patients

Asthma is defined as a chronic inflammatory disorder of the airways with bronchial hyperresponsiveness and variable bronchoconstriction, and is one of the most common diseases in childhood and adolescence. Exercise-induced asthma-like symptoms and asthma are also frequently seen in highly trained athletes. Exercise-induced asthma (EIA) and exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) are found in 8%–10% of healthy school-aged children and in 35% of children with asthma. Highly increased ventilation, inhalation of cold, dry air and air pollutants (eg, chlorine) are thought to be important triggers for EIA and EIB. EIA is often experienced concurrently with vocal cord dysfunction, which needs to be considered during the differential diagnosis. The pharmacological treatment of EIA is similar to the treatment of asthma in nonexercising adolescents. The therapy is based on anti-inflammatory drugs (eg, inhaled glucocorticosteroids) and bronchodilators (eg, β₂-agonists). The treatment of EIB is comparable to the treatment of EIA and leukotriene modifiers offer a new and promising treatment option, particularly in EIB. Generally, athletes may not use β₂-agonists according to the prohibited list of the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA). However, the WADA list contains specific β₂-agonistic substances that are permitted to be used by inhalation.

Effect of warm-up exercise on exercise-induced bronchoconstriction

PURPOSE

Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) occurs when vigorous exercise induces bronchoconstriction. Preexercise warm-up routines are frequently used to elicit a refractory period and thus reduce or prevent EIB. This study aimed to conduct a systematic review to evaluate the effectiveness of preexercise routines to attenuate EIB.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was performed, with steps taken to avoid publication and selection bias. Preexercise warm-up routines were classified into four groups: interval high intensity, continuous low intensity, continuous high intensity, and variable intensity (i.e., a combination of low intensity up to very high intensity). The EIB response was measured by the percent fall in the forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) after exercise, and the mean differences (MDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) are reported.

RESULTS

Seven randomized studies met the inclusion criteria. The pooled results showed that high intensity (MD = -10.6%, 95% CI = -14.7% to -6.5%) and variable intensity (MD = -10.9%, 95% CI = -14.37% to -7.5%) exercise warm-up attenuated the fall in FEV1. However, continuous low-intensity warm-up (MD = -12.6%, 95% CI = -26.7% to 1.5%) and continuous high-intensity warm-up (MD = -9.8%, 95% CI = -26.0% to 6.4%) failed to result in a statistically significant reduction in bronchoconstriction.

CONCLUSIONS

The most consistent and effective attenuation of EIB was observed with high-intensity interval and variable intensity preexercise warm-ups. These findings indicate that an appropriate warm-up strategy that includes at least some high-intensity exercise may be a short-term nonpharmacological strategy to reducing EIB.

Hyaluronic acid : perspectives in lung diseases

Hyaluronic acid (HA) is a non-sulphated glycosaminoglycan. It is a natural polymer characterised by a coiled linear chain in particularly well-hydrated configuration composed of repeating disaccaride units. In mammals, its molecular weight can be extremely wide, ranging from 20 to 4,000 kDa. High molecular mass forms are provided with anti-inflammatory properties. A unique characteristic of HA is hydration (up to 6,000 molecules water/molecule of HA) with a major role in the regulation of fluid balance in the interstitium, a fundamental activity on the amorphous colloidal matrix gluing connective cell and fibers, and many other biological functions including lubrication, solute transport and microcirculatory exchange. HA has been widely used in the treatment of eye, ear, joint and skin disorders; in the last 15 years HA has been also proposed successfully in the treatment of a number of lung diseases in vitro, experimental animals and humans. In particular, inhaled HA at relatively high molecular weight has been proven to prevent bronchoconstiction induced in asthmatics by direct and indirect challenges such as inhalation of methacholine, inhalation of ultrasonically nebulised distilled water, muscular exercise. More recently, in patients affected by chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases, we have demonstrated that repeated administrations of inhaled HA (daily, for 8 weeks) induce significant increase in bronchial patency as well as progressive lung deflation with decrease of residual volume. In conclusion there are elements that can let us state that is perhaps time to change the focus to connective tissue and extracellular matrix substances such as HA, in order to prevent and treat chronic lung diseases.

Ergogenic effects of inhaled beta2-agonists in non-asthmatic athletes

The potential ergogenic effects of asthma medication in athletes have been controversially discussed for decades. The prevalence of asthma is higher in elite athletes than in the general population. The highest risk for developing asthmatic symptoms is found in endurance athletes and swimmers. In addition, asthma seems to be more common in winter-sport athletes. Asthmatic athletes commonly use inhaled beta2-agonists to prevent and treat asthmatic symptoms. However, beta2-agonists are prohibited according to the "Prohibited List of the World Anti-Doping Agency" (WADA). Until the end of 2009 an exception was only allowed for the substances formoterol, salbutamol, salmeterol, and terbutaline by inhalation, as long as a so-called therapeutic use exemption has been applied for and was granted by the relevant anti-doping authorities. From 2010 salbutamol and salmeterol are allowed by inhalation requiring a so called declaration of use.

Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction: The effects of montelukast, a leukotriene receptor antagonist

Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) is very common in both patients with asthma and those who are otherwise thought to be normal. The intensity of exercise as well as the type of exercise is important in producing symptoms. This may make some types of exercise such as swimming more suitable and extended running more difficult for patients with this condition. A better understanding of EIB will allow the physician to direct the patient towards a type of exercise and medications that can result in a more active lifestyle without the same concern for resulting symptoms. This is especially important for schoolchildren who are usually enrolled in physical education classes and elite athletes who may desire to participate in competitive sports. Fortunately several medications (short- and long-acting beta(2)-agonists, cromolyn, nedocromil, inhaled corticosteroids, and more recently leukotriene modifiers) have been shown to be effective in preventing or attenuating the effects of exercise in many patients. In addition, inhaled beta(2)-agonists have been shown to quickly reverse the airway obstruction that develops in patients and continue to be the reliever medications of choice. Inhaled corticosteroids are increasingly being recommended as regular therapy now that the role of inflammation and airway injury has been identified in EIB. With the discovery that there is a release of mediators such as histamine and leukotrienes from cells in the airway following exercise with resulting airway obstruction in susceptible individuals, interest has turned to attenuating their effects with mediator antagonists especially those that block the effects of leukotrienes. Studies with an oral leukotriene antagonist, montelukast, have shown beneficial effects in adults and children aged as young as 6 years with EIB. These effects can be demonstrated as soon as two hours and as long as 24 hours after administration without a demonstrated loss of a protective effect after months of treatment. The studies leading up to and resulting in an approval of montelukast for EIB for patients aged 15 years and older are reviewed in this paper.

Airway injury as a mechanism for exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in elite athletes

Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) is a consequence of evaporative water loss in conditioning the inspired air. The water loss causes cooling and dehydration of the airway surface. One acute effect of dehydration is the release of mediators, such as prostaglandins, leukotrienes, and histamine, that can stimulate smooth muscle, causing contraction and a change in vascular permeability. Inspiring cold air increases dehydration of the surface area and causes changes in bronchial blood flow. This article proposes that the pathogenesis of EIB in elite athletes relates to the epithelial injury arising from breathing poorly conditioned air at high flows for long periods of time or high volumes of irritant particles or gases. The evidence to support this proposal comes from many markers of injury. The restorative process after injury involves plasma exudation and movement of cells into the airways, a process repeated many times during a season of training. This process has the potential to expose smooth muscle to a wide variety of plasma- and cell-derived substances. The exposure to these substances over time can lead to an alteration in the contractile properties of the smooth muscle, making it more sensitive to mediators of bronchoconstriction. It is proposed that cold-weather athletes have airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) to pharmacologic agents as a result of epithelial injury. In those who are allergic, AHR can also be expressed as EIB. The role of beta(2)-receptor agonists in inhibiting and enhancing the development of AHR and EIB is discussed.

Angiopoietin-2 as a contributing factor of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in asthmatic patients receiving inhaled corticosteroid therapy

BACKGROUND

Airway microcirculation has the potential to contribute to the pathogenesis of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) in asthma. Recently, angiopoietin-1 has been found to stabilize microvessels and make them leak resistant, whereas angiopoietin-2 is an antagonist of angiopoietin-1 and enhances microvascular permeability.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to examine the roles of angiopoietin-2 in EIB in asthmatic patients with inhaled corticosteroid therapy.

METHODS

Levels of angiopoietin-1 and angiopoietin-2 in induced sputum were examined in 32 asthmatic patients who were receiving inhaled corticosteroid therapy for more than 6 months at the entry of this study and 14 healthy control subjects. All asthmatic patients performed an exercise test.

RESULTS

The degree of eosinophilic airway inflammation did not differ significantly between asthmatic patients and healthy control subjects. Angiopoietin-1 levels were also similar in the 2 groups (asthmatic patients: median, 6.0 ng/mL [range, 2.0-10.7 ng/mL]; healthy control subjects: median, 4.2 ng/mL [range, 1.5-10.7 ng/mL]). In contrast, angiopoietin-2 levels were significantly higher in asthmatic patients than in healthy control subjects (asthmatic patients: median, 0.74 ng/mL [range, 0.3-1.2 ng/mL]; healthy control subjects: median, 0.26 ng/mL [range, 0.05-0.47 ng/mL]; P < .001). There was no significant correlation between angiopoietin-1 levels and the severity of EIB in asthmatic patients. However, angiopoietin-2 levels were significantly correlated with the severity of EIB and airway microvascular permeability index.

CONCLUSION

Angiopoietin-2 levels were increased in the airways of asthmatic patients with inhaled corticosteroid therapy, and its levels were associated with the severity of EIB.

Do inhaled beta(2)-agonists have an ergogenic potential in non-asthmatic competitive athletes?

The prevalence of asthma is higher in elite athletes than in the general population. The risk of developing asthmatic symptoms is the highest in endurance athletes and swimmers. Asthma seems particularly widespread in winter-sport athletes such as cross-country skiers. Asthmatic athletes commonly use inhaled beta(2)-agonists to prevent and treat asthmatic symptoms. However, beta(2)-agonists are prohibited according to the Prohibited List of the World Anti-Doping Agency. An exception can be made only for the substances formoterol, salbutamol, salmeterol and terbutaline by inhalation, as long as a therapeutic use exemption has been applied for and granted. In this context, the question arises of whether beta(2)-agonists have ergogenic benefits justifying the prohibition of these substances. In 17 of 19 randomised placebo-controlled trials in non-asthmatic competitive athletes, performance-enhancing effects of the inhaled beta(2)-agonists formoterol, salbutamol, salmeterol and terbutaline could not be proved. This is particularly true for endurance performance, anaerobic power and strength performance. In three of four studies, even supratherapeutic doses of salbutamol (800-1200 microg) had no ergogenic effect. In contrast to inhaled beta(2)-agonists, oral administration of salbutamol seems to be able to improve the muscle strength and the endurance performance. There appears to be no justification to prohibit inhaled beta(2)-agonists from the point of view of the ergogenic effects.

Neoceptors: reengineering GPCRs to recognize tailored ligands

Efforts to model and reengineer the putative binding sites of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) have led to an approach that combines small-molecule 'classical' medicinal chemistry and gene therapy. In this approach, complementary structural changes (e.g. based on novel ionic or H-bonds) are made in the receptor and ligand for the selective enhancement of affinity. Thus, a modified receptor (neoceptor) is designed for activation by tailor-made agonists that do not interact with the native receptor. The neoceptor is no longer activated by the native agonist, but rather functions as a scaffold for the docking of novel small molecules (neoligands). In theory, the approach could verify the accuracy of GPCR molecular modeling, the investigation of signaling, the design of small molecules to rescue disease-related mutations, and small-molecule-directed gene therapy. The neoceptor-neoligand pairing could offer spatial specificity by delivering the neoceptor to a target site, and temporal specificity by administering neoligand when needed.

Beta2-agonists and exercise-induced asthma

Beta2-agonists taken immediately before exercise provide significant protection against exercise- induced asthma (EIA) in most patients. However, when they are taken daily, there are some negative aspects regarding severity, control, and recovery from EIA. First, there is a significant minority (15-20%) of asthmatics whose EIA is not prevented by beta2-agonists, even when inhaled corticosteroids are used concomitantly. Second, with daily use, there is a decline in duration of the protective effect of long-acting beta2-agonists. Third, if breakthrough EIA occurs, recovery of lung function is slower in response to a beta2-agonist, and additional doses are often required to achieve pre-exercise values. If a person who takes a beta2-agonist daily experiences problems with exercise, then the physician should consider changing the treatment regimen to achieve better control of EIA. These problems likely result from desensitization of the beta2-receptor on the mast cell, which enhances mediator release, and on the bronchial smooth muscle, which enhances the bronchoconstrictor response and delays recovery from EIA. These effects are reversed within 72 h after cessation of a beta2-agonists. The important clinical question is: Are we actually compromising the beneficial effects of beta2-agonists on the prevention and recovery from EIA by prescribing them daily? Patients with EIA need to ensure that their doses of inhaled corticosteroid or other anti-inflammatory therapy are optimized so that, if necessary, a beta2-agonist can be used intermittently as prophylactic medication with greater confidence in the outcome.

beta2-Agonists at the Olympic Games

The different approaches that the International Olympic Committee (IOC) had adopted to beta2-agonists and the implications for athletes are reviewed by a former Olympic team physician who later became a member of the Medical Commission of the IOC (IOC-MC). Steadily increasing knowledge of the effects of inhaled beta2-agonists on health, is concerned with the fact that oral beta2-agonists may be anabolic, and rapid increased use of inhaled beta2-agonists by elite athletes has contributed to the changes to the IOC rules. Since 2001, the necessity for athletes to meet IOC criteria (i.e., that they have asthma and/or exercise-induced asthma [EIA]) has resulted in improved management of athletes. The prevalence of beta2-agonist use by athletes mirrors the known prevalence of asthma symptoms in each country, although athletes in endurance events have the highest prevalence. The age-of-onset of asthma/EIA in elite winter athletes may be atypical. Of the 193 athletes at the 2006 Winter Olympics who met th IOC's criteria, only 32.1% had childhood asthma and 48.7% of athletes reported onset at age 20 yr or older. These findings lead to speculation that years of intense endurance training may be a causative factor in bronchial hyperreactivity. The distinction between oral (prohibited in sports) and inhaled salbutamol is possible, but athletes must be warned that excessive use of inhaled salbutamol can lead to urinary concentrations similar to those observed after oral administration. This article provides justification that athletes should provide evidence of asthma or EIA before being permitted to use inhaled beta2-agonists.

Onset and duration of protection against exercise-induced bronchoconstriction by a single oral dose of montelukast

BACKGROUND

Leukotriene modifiers have been shown to protect against exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) with repeated, chronic dosing.

OBJECTIVE

To study the onset and duration of protection against EIB after a single dose of montelukast, a leukotriene receptor antagonist.

METHODS

In this randomized, crossover, double-blind study, 51 adult asthma patients with EIB (> or = 20% postexercise decrease in forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1]) received a single oral dose of montelukast (10 mg), or placebo followed by exercise challenge 2, 12, and 24 hours after dosing. The primary end point was maximum percentage decrease in FEV1 from preexercise baseline during 60 minutes after the 2-hour challenge.

RESULTS

At 2, 12, and 24 hours after dosing, the maximum decrease in FEV1 was 10.8% +/- 7.9%, 8.4% +/- 7.5%, and 8.3% +/- 7.3% for montelukast and 22.3% +/- 13.1%, 16.1% +/- 10.2%, and 16.9% +/- 11.7% for placebo, respectively (P < or = .001 at each time point). Postexercise recovery was quicker with montelukast than with placebo (P < or = .001); mean (95% confidence interval) differences were -26.8 minutes (-35.1 to -18.4 minutes), -16.0 minutes (-22.9 to -9.2 minutes), and -17.4 minutes (-24.9 to -9.9 minutes) at the 3 time points, respectively. At all time points, area under the curve for percentage decrease in FEV1 during 60 minutes after exercise was smaller after montelukast (P < or = .001); montelukast protected more patients against EIB (P < or = .001). Fewer patients required postexercise beta-agonist rescue at 2 hours after dosing with montelukast (P = .03).

CONCLUSION

Montelukast provided significant protection against EIB as soon as 2 hours after a single oral dose, with persistent benefit up to 24 hours.

Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction: pathogenesis

There is still active debate on the acute mechanism of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB). Although it is unlikely that vasoconstriction and hyperemia of the bronchial vasculature are essential events for EIB, it is likely that this vasculature enhances the airway response to dehydration and contributes to the pathogenesis of EIB, particularly in elite athletes. Accumulating evidence suggests that airway smooth muscle (ASM) becomes more sensitive as a result of repeated exposure to bulk plasma in response to airway injury from dehydration. Recent evidence also demonstrates sufficient concentrations of mediators that could affect ASM. Paradoxically, mediator release from mast cells may be enhanced and their contractile effects greater when beta(2)-receptor agonists are taken daily. The effect of drugs that have the potential to reduce microvascular leak and reduce or inhibit release or action of these mediators needs to be investigated in elite athletes.

Single-dose agents in the prevention of exercise-induced asthma: a descriptive review

Exercise-induced asthma (EIA) refers to the transient narrowing of the airways that occurs after vigorous exercise in 50-60% of patients with asthma. The need to condition the air inspired during exercise causes water to be lost from the airway surface, and this is thought to cause the release of inflammatory mediators (histamine, leukotrienes, and prostaglandins) from mast cells. EIA is associated with airway inflammation and its severity is markedly reduced following treatment with inhaled corticosteroids. Drugs that inhibit the release of mediators and drugs that inhibit their contractile effects are the most successful in inhibiting EIA. Single doses of short-acting beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonists, given as aerosols immediately before exercise, are very effective in the majority of patients with asthma, providing about 80% protection for up to 2 hours. Long-acting beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonists (LABAs) given in single doses can be effective for up to 12 hours when used intermittently, but tolerance to the protective effect occurs if they are taken daily. Drugs such as cromolyn sodium (sodium cromoglicate) and nedocromil given as aerosols are less effective than beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonists (beta(2)-agonists), providing 50-60% protection for only 1-2 hours, but they have some advantages. They do not induce tolerance, the aerosol dosage can be easily titrated for the individual, and the protective effect is immediate. Because they cause no significant adverse effects, multiple doses can be used in a day. Leukotriene receptor antagonists, such as montelukast and zafirlukast, are also used for the prevention of EIA and provide 50-60% protection for up to 24 hours when given as tablets. Tolerance to the protective effect does not develop with regular use. If breakthrough EIA occurs, a beta(2)-agonist can be used effectively for rescue medication. For those patients with more persistent symptoms, the use of a LABA in combination with an inhaled corticosteroid has raised a number of issues with respect to the choice of prophylactic treatment for EIA. The most important issue is the development of tolerance to the protective effect of a LABA such that extra treatment may be needed in the middle of a treatment period. Recommending extra doses of a beta(2)-agonist to control EIA is not advisable on the basis that multiple doses can enhance the severity of EIA, delay spontaneous recovery from bronchoconstriction, and enhance responses to other contractile stimuli. It is time to take into account the advantages and disadvantages of the different drugs available to prevent EIA and to recognize that there are some myths related to their use in EIA.

Paradoxical strategy for treating chronic diseases where the therapeutic effect is derived from compensatory response rather than drug effect

Reversing chronic conditions remains an elusive goal of medicine. The modern medical paradigm based on blocking overactive pathways or augmenting deficient pathways offers symptomatic benefit, but tolerance to therapy can develop and treatment cessation can produce rebound symptoms due to compensatory mechanisms. We propose a paradoxical strategy for treating chronic conditions based on harnessing compensatory mechanisms for therapeutic benefit. Many current drugs may be repurposed for a paradoxical indication where the therapeutic effect is derived from compensatory response, rather than drug effect. For example, although exercise is associated with acute adrenergia, paradoxical downregulation of baseline sympathovagal ratio occurs as a remodeling response. For conditions that manifest chronic sympathetic bias such as cardiovascular diseases, judicious administration of adrenergic agonists may induce compensatory downregulation of baseline sympathovagal ratio. The concept may generalize to many other diseases, especially those involving pathways which exhibit strong homeostatic tendencies such as the neurologic, immune, and endocrine systems. Careful consideration of chronobiologic features is necessary to optimize dosing strategies for modulating compensatory responses, and eccentric dosing schedules, shorter-acting formulations, or pulsatile delivery may be desirable in some cases. To what extent the effect of desensitization to current therapy is mistaken for disease progression in conditions such as diabetes, myopia, depression, and hypertension warrants investigation. The merits of combining behavioral and drug therapies such as diet-insulin therapy for diabetes and exercise-beta-blockade for cardiovascular disease should be revisited since there is a risk for exacerbating the underlying dysfunction. The reduced dynamic range of various environmental experiences and the tendency to revert to the mean through medical intervention, thermoregulation, and other modern lifestyle changes may play under-recognized roles in human diseases. Perhaps alternating agonists and antagonist may exercise the entire dynamic range of pathways and improve health.