When Time is Not on Your Side: Patient Experiences with Waiting for Home Care and Admission to a Nursing or Residential Home

Level of Need, Divertibility, and Outcomes of Newly Admitted Nursing Home Residents

OBJECTIVES

To describe the level of need and divertibility of newly admitted nursing home residents, describe the factors that drive need, and describe the outcomes of residents across different levels of need.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

A total of 640 publicly funded nursing homes (also known as long-term care facilities) in Ontario, Canada.

PARTICIPANTS

All newly admitted residents between January 1, 2010 and March 1, 2012.

MEASUREMENTS

We categorized residents into 36 groups based on different levels of (1) cognitive impairment, (2) difficulty in activities of daily living (ADL), (3) difficulty in instrumental ADLs, and (4) whether or not they had a caregiver at home. Residents were then categorized as having low, intermediate, or high needs; applying results from previous "Balance of Care" studies, we also captured the proportion who could have been cost-effectively diverted into the community. We then contrasted the characteristics of residents across the needs and divertible groupings, and compared 4 outcomes among these groups: hospital admissions, emergency department visits, mortality, and return to home.

RESULTS

A population-level cohort of 64,105 incident admissions was captured. About two-thirds had great difficulty performing ADLs (65%) and had mild to severe cognitive impairment (66%); over 90% had great difficulty with instrumental ADLs. Just less than 50% of the new admissions were considered to be residents with high care needs (cognitively impaired with great ADL difficulty), while only 4.5% (2880 residents) had low care needs (cognition and ADL intact). Those with dementia (71.0%) and previous stroke (21.5%) were over-represented in the high needs group. Those that cannot be divertible to anywhere else but an institution with 24 hour nursing care comprised 41.3% (n = 26,502) of residents. Only 5.4% (n = 3483), based on community resources available, could potentially be cost-effectively diverted to the community. Those at higher needs experienced higher rates of mortality, higher total cost across all health sectors, and lower rates of return to home.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of those admitted into nursing homes have high levels of need (driven largely by dementia and stroke) and could not have their needs met cost-effectively elsewhere, suggesting that the system is at capacity. Caring for the long-term care needs of the aging population should consider the balance of investments in institution and community settings.

[Perseverance time of informal carers: a new concept in dementia care : Validation and exploration]

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to introduce the concept of perseverance time of informal carers of relatives with dementia living at home.

METHODS

During 2 years data were collected from 223 informal carers of persons with dementia and the care situation. Convergent validity was assessed by looking at associations of perseverance time with validated instruments for measuring subjective burden and happiness. Content validity was evaluated by performing bi- and multivariate correlations between perseverance time and characteristics of persons with dementia, informal carers and care situations.

RESULTS

Correlation coefficients between perseverance time and the validated measures of burden and happiness were significant. Health of the person with dementia, informal carer living apart from the person with dementia, and male gender of informal carer were positively associated with perseverance time; need for supervision, intensity of informal care provision, and reductions in working hours and hobbies in order to be able to provide care negatively. The predictive validity was significant with a perseverance time up to 2 years.

CONCLUSIONS

This investigation provides a first indication of the validity of the concept of perseverance time, but replication is necessary. In healthcare practice persevering time provides clues for early detection of overburdening and crises situations.

The perseverance time of informal carers for people with dementia: results of a two-year longitudinal follow-up study

Background

Given the projected increase of people with dementia over the next few decades and the related demand for informal care, an important question for health policy makers is to what extent and for how long informal carers can be expected to provide care in a sustainable way. This study aimed to investigate the perseverance time of informal carers for people with dementia.

Methods

A 2-year longitudinal cohort study was conducted. Questionnaires were used to collect data about the care situation, the impact of caregiving on carers and their need for support, and the anticipated and realized perseverance time of informal carers for people with dementia living at home. The data were analysed using bivariate and multivariate analyses.

Results

Two hundred twenty-three carers for people with dementia were included in the study and 25 (11.2 %) dropped out during the follow-up. The results show that after 1 year, 74 (37.4 %) of 198 patients were still living at home, and after 2 years, 44 (22.2 %) patients were still living at home. The variables that were associated with this outcome were identified. When informal carers anticipated that their perseverance time would be less than 1 year, this was indicative of their actual perseverance time.

Conclusions

Anticipated perseverance time provides a fair indication of the actual duration of informal care. It is most accurate when carers anticipate a limited rather than an unlimited perseverance time. Although further research is required to support these findings, the concept of perseverance time may be considered a useful additional instrument in health policy and clinical practice for monitoring carers’ need for support and for planning the transition of care from home to a nursing home.

Predictors of prolonged hospital stay for the treatment of severe neuropsychiatric symptoms in patients with dementia: a cohort study in multiple hospitals

BACKGROUND

Long hospitalization is often needed to treat severe behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD), which places heavy demands on hospital resources. Consequently, patients with severe BPSD usually wait for a long time to be admitted. There is a need to identify factors related to long hospitalization to better manage resources of a psychiatric hospital.

METHODS

We surveyed 150 consecutive patients hospitalized in the neuropsychiatric units of three hospitals for treatment of BPSD from 11 May 2009 to 30 November 2010. Only patients with reliable relatives were included in the study. We evaluated data of the patients (demographics, cognitive impairment, activities of daily living, causal disease for dementia, dementia severity, and the amount of pension), their primary caregivers (demographics and care burden), and their doctors' years of experience in treating dementia. We followed up to 180 days and assessed the effect of these factors on the length of stay.

RESULTS

Of the 150 patients, 104 were discharged within 180 days and 46 were hospitalized for more than 180 days. Average length of stay for patients was 110.4 ± 58.1 days. In both univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard analyses, length of stay was longer for patients with smaller pensions and patients whose doctors had fewer years of experience in treating dementia. Length of stay was not found to be associated with any of the other variables.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with smaller pensions and whose doctors had less experience in treating dementia tended to require longer hospitalization.

The invisible hands made visible: recognizing the value of informal care in healthcare decision-making

The healthcare sector depends heavily on the informal care provided by families and friends of those who are ill. Informal caregivers may experience significant burden as well as health and well-being effects. Resource allocation decisions, in particular from a societal perspective, should account explicitly for these effects in the social environment of patients. This is not only important to make a complete welfare economic assessment of treatments, but also to ensure the lasting involvement of informal caregivers in the care-giving process. Measurement and valuation techniques for the costs and effects of informal care have been developed and their use is becoming more common. Decision-makers in healthcare - and eventually families and patients - would be helped by more uniformity in methods.

Coping with caring: Profiles of caregiving by informal carers living with a loved one who has dementia

Background and aim: While the number of people suffering from dementia in the Netherlands will double in the next 25 years, there are no plans to expand the capacity of residential care facilities for these patients. This will almost inevitably lead to an increase in the burden placed on informal carers. We investigated how caregivers living with a loved one who has dementia experience their caregiving situation.

Methods: For this study, 53 caregivers ranked a structured set of opinion statements covering a representative range of aspects of caregiving. By-person factor analysis was used to uncover patterns in the rankings of statements.

Results: Five distinct profiles of caregiving were identified that provide information on the various care situations that can occur, the needs and dilemmas that these caregivers face, and the subjective burden and perseverance time of the carers.

Conclusions: The findings contribute to the development of interventions for the support of informal caregivers.

Predictors of long-term care utilization by Dutch hospital patients aged 65+

Background

Long-term care is often associated with high health care expenditures. In the Netherlands, an ageing population will likely increase the demand for long-term care within the near future. The development of risk profiles will not only be useful for projecting future demand, but also for providing clues that may prevent or delay long-term care utilization. Here, we report our identification of predictors of long-term care utilization in a cohort of hospital patients aged 65+ following their discharge from hospital discharge and who, prior to hospital admission, were living at home.

Methods

The data were obtained from three national databases in the Netherlands: the national hospital discharge register, the long-term care expenses register and the population register. Multinomial logistic regression was applied to determine which variables were the best predictors of long-term care utilization. The model included demographic characteristics and several medical diagnoses. The outcome variables were discharge to home with no formal care (reference category), discharge to home with home care, admission to a nursing home and admission to a home for the elderly.

Results

The study cohort consisted of 262,439 hospitalized patients. A higher age, longer stay in the hospital and absence of a spouse were found to be associated with a higher risk of all three types of long-term care. Individuals with a child had a lower risk of requiring residential care. Cerebrovascular diseases [relative risk ratio (RRR) = 11.5] were the strongest disease predictor of nursing home admission, and fractures of the ankle or lower leg (RRR = 6.1) were strong determinants of admission to a home for the elderly. Lung cancer (RRR = 4.9) was the strongest determinant of discharge to the home with home care.

Conclusions

These results emphasize the impact of age, absence/presence of a spouse and disease on long-term care utilization. In an era of demographic and epidemiological changes, not only will hospital use change, but also the need for long-term care following hospital discharge. The results of this study can be used by policy-makers for planning health care utilization services and anticipating future health care needs.