Glatiramer acetate in situ forming gel, a new approach for multiple sclerosis treatment

BACKGROUND

Glatiramer acetate (GA), a commonly used treatment for multiple sclerosis (MS), requires long-term frequent injections to ensure its effectiveness. This often leads to adverse effects, patient noncompliance, and economic inefficiency.

OBJECTIVES

In this study, poloxamer, as a thermosensitive polymer modified by chitosan (CS) and hyaluronic acid (HA), was employed to prepare an in situ forming prolonged release formulation of GA to overcome the problems derived from frequent repeated injections and to enhance the patient compliance.

METHODS

The sol-gel formulation was produced through a cold method and optimized using design of experiments. The final product was characterized in terms of gelation time (GT), rheological behaviors, morphological properties, assay, and drug release kinetics.

RESULTS

The in vitro release rate of GA during the first 24 h was quite rapid, but then it continued at a slower rate of 0.05 mg ml-1h-1. The in vivo analysis after the subcutaneous injections showed lower levels of IL-5, IL-13, and uric acid (UA) in mice treated with the gel formulation compared with those receiving free GA in the first few days. However, after 10 days, significantly higher concentrations were detected, which continued to increase slowly.

CONCLUSION

It can be concluded that the designed thermosensitive sol-gel formula is capable of extending the effectiveness of GA and can be considered as a promising sustained release formulation for the treatment of MS.

Antimicrobial peptide glatiramer acetate targets Pseudomonas aeruginosa lipopolysaccharides to breach membranes without altering lipopolysaccharide modification

Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are key components of innate immunity across all domains of life. Natural and synthetic AMPs are receiving renewed attention in efforts to combat the antimicrobial resistance (AMR) crisis and the loss of antibiotic efficacy. The gram-negative pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa is one of the most concerning infecting bacteria in AMR, particularly in people with cystic fibrosis (CF) where respiratory infections are difficult to eradicate and associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Cationic AMPs exploit the negatively charged lipopolysaccharides (LPS) on P. aeruginosa to bind and disrupt bacterial membrane(s), causing lethal damage. P. aeruginosa modifies its LPS to evade AMP killing. Free-LPS is also a component of CF sputum and feeds pro-inflammatory cycles. Glatiramer acetate (GA) is a random peptide co-polymer-of glycine, lysine, alanine, tyrosine-used as a drug in treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS); we have previously shown GA to be an AMP which synergises with tobramycin against CF P. aeruginosa, functioning via bacterial membrane disruption. Here, we demonstrate GA's direct binding and sequestration/neutralisation of P. aeruginosa LPS, in keeping with GA's ability to disrupt the outer membrane. At CF-relevant LPS concentrations, however, membrane disruption by GA was not strongly inhibited. Furthermore, exposure to GA did not result in increased Lipid A modification of LPS or in increased gene expression of systems involved in AMP sensing and LPS modification. Therefore, despite the electrostatic targeting of LPS by GA as part of its activity, P. aeruginosa does not demonstrate LPS modification in its defence.

The evolution of multiple sclerosis disease-modifying therapies: An update for pharmacists

PURPOSE

Multiple sclerosis (MS) and the evolution of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) and their indications, mechanisms of action, efficacy, pregnancy class, and cost are discussed.

SUMMARY

MS is an immune-mediated, demyelinating, and progressive neurological disorder that can cause both motor and cognitive deficits. Onset of MS typically occurs between the ages of 20 and 40 years, and the disease can result in significant disability over time. Since the introduction of the first DMT for the treatment of MS in 1993, significant progress has been made in the development of new classes of DMTs with different mechanisms of action, higher efficacy, and simpler administration schedules, offering patients better alternatives. However, drawbacks with the use of DMTs include their increasing cost and formulary restrictions.

CONCLUSION

The treatment landscape of MS has significantly changed over the past 2 decades, and the introduction of newer classes of DMTs provides an opportunity for pharmacists to play an important role in the management of this patient population.

Novel liposomal glatiramer acetate: Preparation and immunomodulatory evaluation in murine model of multiple sclerosis

The frequent administration rate required for Glatiramer acetate (GA), a first-line therapy for Multiple sclerosis (MS), poses patient compliance issues. Only a small portion of the subcutaneously administered GA is available for phagocytosis by macrophages, as most of it is hydrolyzed at its administration site or excreted renally. To unravel these hurdles, we have prepared liposomal formulations of GA through thin film-hydration method plus extrusion. The clinical and histopathological efficacy of GA-loaded liposomes were assessed in prophylactic and therapeutic manners on murine model of MS (experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE)). The selected GA liposomal formulation showed favorable size (275 nm on average), high loading efficiency, and high macrophage localization. Moreover, administration of GA-liposomes in mice robustly suppressed the inflammatory responses and decreased the inflammatory and demyelinated lesion regions in CNS compared to the free GA with subsequent reduction of the EAE clinical score. Our study indicated that liposomal GA could be served as a reliable nanomedicine-based platform to hopefully curb MS-related aberrant autoreactive immune responses with higher efficacy, longer duration of action, fewer administration frequencies, and higher delivery rate to macrophages. This platform has the potential to be introduced as a vaccine for MS after clinical translation and merits further investigations.

Reconsidering the route of drug delivery in refractory multiple sclerosis: Toward a more effective drug accumulation in the central nervous system

Multiple sclerosis is a chronic demyelinating disease with different disease phenotypes. The current FDA-approved disease-modifying therapeutics (DMTs) cannot cure the disease, but only alleviate the disease progression. While the majority of patients respond well to treatment, some of them are suffering from rapid progression. Current drug delivery strategies include the oral, intravenous, subdermal, and intramuscular routes, so these drugs are delivered systemically, which is appropriate when the therapeutic targets are peripheral. However, the potential benefits may be diminished when these targets sequester behind the barriers of the central nervous system. Moreover, systemic drug administration is plagued with adverse effects, sometimes severe. In this context, it is prudent to consider other drug delivery strategies improving their accumulation in the brain, thus providing better prospects for patients with rapidly progressing disease course. These targeted drug delivery strategies may also reduce the severity of systemic adverse effects. Here, we discuss the possibilities and indications for reconsideration of drug delivery routes (especially for those "non-responding" patients) and the search for alternative drug delivery strategies. More targeted drug delivery strategies sometimes require quite invasive procedures, but the potential therapeutic benefits and reduction of adverse effects could outweigh the risks. We characterized the major FDA-approved DMTs focusing on their therapeutic mechanism and the potential benefits of improving the accumulation of these drugs in the brain.

How does neurovascular unit dysfunction contribute to multiple sclerosis?

Multiple sclerosis is an inflammatory demyelinating disease of the central nervous system (CNS) and the most common non-traumatic cause of neurological disability in young adults. Multiple sclerosis clinical care has improved considerably due to the development of disease-modifying therapies that effectively modulate the peripheral immune response and reduce relapse frequency. However, current treatments do not prevent neurodegeneration and disease progression, and efforts to prevent multiple sclerosis will be hampered so long as the cause of this disease remains unknown. Risk factors for multiple sclerosis development or severity include vitamin D deficiency, cigarette smoking and youth obesity, which also impact vascular health. People with multiple sclerosis frequently experience blood-brain barrier breakdown, microbleeds, reduced cerebral blood flow and diminished neurovascular reactivity, and it is possible that these vascular pathologies are tied to multiple sclerosis development. The neurovascular unit is a cellular network that controls neuroinflammation, maintains blood-brain barrier integrity, and tightly regulates cerebral blood flow, matching energy supply to neuronal demand. The neurovascular unit is composed of vessel-associated cells such as endothelial cells, pericytes and astrocytes, however neuronal and other glial cell types also comprise the neurovascular niche. Recent single-cell transcriptomics data, indicate that neurovascular cells, particular cells of the microvasculature, are compromised within multiple sclerosis lesions. Large-scale genetic and small-scale cell biology studies also suggest that neurovascular dysfunction could be a primary pathology contributing to multiple sclerosis development. Herein we revisit multiple sclerosis risk factors and multiple sclerosis pathophysiology and highlight the known and potential roles of neurovascular unit dysfunction in multiple sclerosis development and disease progression. We also evaluate the suitability of the neurovascular unit as a potential target for future disease modifying therapies for multiple sclerosis.

Recent Progress in Multiple Sclerosis Treatment Using Immune Cells as Targets

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune-mediated demyelinating disease of the central nervous system. The main pathological features are inflammatory reaction, demyelination, axonal disintegration, reactive gliosis, etc. The etiology and pathogenesis of the disease have not been clarified. The initial studies believed that T cell-mediated cellular immunity is the key to the pathogenesis of MS. In recent years, more and more evidence has shown that B cells and their mediated humoral immune and innate immune cells (such as microglia, dendritic cells, macrophages, etc.) also play an important role in the pathogenesis of MS. This article mainly reviews the research progress of MS by targeting different immune cells and analyzes the action pathways of drugs. The types and mechanisms of immune cells related to the pathogenesis are introduced in detail, and the mechanisms of drugs targeting different immune cells are discussed in depth. This article aims to clarify the pathogenesis and immunotherapy pathway of MS, hoping to find new targets and strategies for the development of therapeutic drugs for MS.

Omics approaches to understanding the efficacy and safety of disease-modifying treatments in multiple sclerosis

From the perspective of precision medicine, the challenge for the future is to improve the accuracy of diagnosis, prognosis, and prediction of therapeutic responses through the identification of biomarkers. In this framework, the omics sciences (genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics) and their combined use represent innovative approaches for the exploration of the complexity and heterogeneity of multiple sclerosis (MS). This review examines the evidence currently available on the application of omics sciences to MS, analyses the methods, their limitations, the samples used, and their characteristics, with a particular focus on biomarkers associated with the disease state, exposure to disease-modifying treatments (DMTs), and drug efficacies and safety profiles.

Synergistic Activity of Repurposed Peptide Drug Glatiramer Acetate with Tobramycin against Cystic Fibrosis Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is the most common pathogen infecting the lungs of people with cystic fibrosis (CF), causing both acute and chronic infections. Intrinsic and acquired antibiotic resistance, coupled with the physical barriers resulting from desiccated CF sputum, allow P. aeruginosa to colonize and persist in spite of antibiotic treatment. As well as the specific difficulties in eradicating P. aeruginosa from CF lungs, P. aeruginosa is also subject to the wider, global issue of antimicrobial resistance. Glatiramer acetate (GA) is a peptide drug, used in the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS), which has been shown to have moderate antipseudomonal activity. Other antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) have been shown to be antibiotic resistance breakers, potentiating the activities of antibiotics when given in combination, restoring and/or enhancing antibiotic efficacy. Growth, viability, MIC determinations, and synergy analysis showed that GA improved the efficacy of tobramycin (TOB) against reference strains of P. aeruginosa, reducing TOB MICs and synergizing with the aminoglycoside. This was also the case for clinical strains from people with CF. GA significantly reduced the MIC50 of TOB for viable cells from 1.69 mg/L (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.26 to 8.97) to 0.62 mg/L (95% CI, 0.15 to 3.94; P = 0.002) and the MIC90 for viable cells from 7.00 mg/L (95% CI, 1.18 to 26.50) to 2.20 mg/L (95% CI, 0.99 to 15.03; P = 0.001), compared to results with TOB only. Investigation of mechanisms of GA activity showed that GA resulted in significant disruption of outer membranes, depolarization of cytoplasmic membranes, and permeabilization of P. aeruginosa and was the only agent tested (including cationic AMPs) to significantly affect all three mechanisms. IMPORTANCE The antimicrobial resistance crisis urgently requires solutions to the lost efficacy of antibiotics. The repurposing of drugs already in clinical use, with strong safety profiles, as antibiotic adjuvants to restore the efficacy of antibiotics is an important avenue to alleviating the resistance crisis. This research shows that a clinically used drug from outside infection treatment, glatiramer acetate, reduces the concentration of tobramycin required to be effective in treating Pseudomonas aeruginosa, based on analyses of both reference and clinical respiratory isolates from people with cystic fibrosis. The two agents acted synergistically against P. aeruginosa, being more effective combined in vitro than predicted for their combination. As a peptide drug, glatiramer acetate functions similarly to many antimicrobial peptides, interacting with and disrupting the P. aeruginosa cell wall and permeabilizing bacterial cells, thereby allowing tobramycin to work. Our findings demonstrate that glatiramer acetate is a strong candidate for repurposing as an antibiotic resistance breaker of pathogenic P. aeruginosa.

Nicolau syndrome caused by Glatiramer

Injection-site reactions to glatiramer are common and include erythema, pruritus, pain, or induration. Additionally, the present systematic review of the literature documents 20 cases of Nicolau syndrome following glatiramer, a rare but potentially severe skin reaction. Abdomen and thighs are the most frequently affected areas (80% of reported cases), and permanent skin damage has been observed in 30% of cases. Recurrences are rare (<10%).

Influence of Genetic Polymorphisms on Clinical Outcomes of Glatiramer Acetate in Multiple Sclerosis Patients

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic, inflammatory, demyelinating disease of autoimmune origin, in which inflammation and demyelination lead to neurodegeneration and progressive disability. Treatment is aimed at slowing down the course of the disease and mitigating its symptoms. One of the first-line treatments used in patients with MS is glatiramer acetate (GA). However, in clinical practice, a response rate of between 30% and 55% is observed. This variability in the effectiveness of the medication may be influenced by genetic factors such as polymorphisms in the genes involved in the pathogenesis of MS. Therefore, this review assesses the impact of genetic variants on the response to GA therapy in patients diagnosed with MS. The results suggest that a relationship exists between the effectiveness of the treatment with GA and the presence of polymorphisms in the following genes: CD86, CLEC16A, CTSS, EOMES, MBP, FAS, TRBC1, IL1R1, IL12RB2, IL22RA2, PTPRT, PVT1, ALOX5AP, MAGI2, ZAK, RFPL3, UVRAG, SLC1A4, and HLA-DRB1*1501. Consequently, the identification of polymorphisms in these genes can be used in the future as a predictive marker of the response to GA treatment in patients diagnosed with MS. Nevertheless, there is a lack of evidence for this and more validation studies need to be conducted to apply this information to clinical practice.

Acting centrally or peripherally: A renewed interest in the central nervous system penetration of disease-modifying drugs in multiple sclerosis

With the recent approval of cladribine tablets, siponimod and ozanimod, there has been a renewed interest into the extent to which these current generation disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) are able to cross into the central nervous system (CNS), and how this penetration of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) may influence their ability to treat multiple sclerosis (MS). The integrity of the CNS is maintained by the BBB, blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier, and the arachnoid barrier, which all play an important role in preserving the immunological environment and homeostasis within the CNS. The integrity of the BBB decreases during the course of MS, with a putative temporal relationship to disease worsening. Furthermore, it is currently considered that progression of the disease is mediated mainly by resident cells of the CNS. The existing literature provides evidence to show that some of the current generation DMTs for MS are able to penetrate the CNS and potentially exert direct effects on CNS-resident cells, in particular the CNS-penetrating prodrugs cladribine and fingolimod, and other sphingosine-1 phosphate receptor modulators; siponimod and ozanimod. Other current generation DMTs appear to be restricted to the periphery due to their high molecular weight or physicochemical properties. As more effective brain penetrant therapies are developed for the treatment of MS, there is a need to understand whether the potential for direct effects within the CNS are of significance, and whether this brings additional benefits over and above treatment effects mediated in the periphery. In turn, this will require an improved understanding of the structure and function of the BBB, the role it plays in MS and subsequent treatments. This narrative review summarizes the data supporting the biological plausibility of a potential benefit from therapeutic molecules entering the CNS, and discusses the potential significance in the current and future treatment of MS.

Management of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in Qatar: an expert consensus

Healthcare systems vary greatly between countries. International, evidence-based guidelines for the management of multiple sclerosis (MS) may need to be adapted for use in particular countries. Two years ago, the authors published a comprehensive consensus guideline for the management of MS in Qatar. Since that time, the availability of disease-modifying treatments for relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS), and our understanding of how to apply those treatments, has increased. The authors present an update to our guidance, focussing on the management of relapsing-remitting RRMS. In particular, the authors consider the optimal use of different DMTs in patients presenting with mild, medium or high disease activity.

Multiple Sclerosis and Cancer: The Ying-Yang Effect of Disease Modifying Therapies

Over the past two decades, the field of multiple sclerosis (MS) has been transformed by the rapidly expanding arsenal of new disease modifying therapies (DMTs). Current DMTs for MS aim to modulate innate and adaptive immune responses toward a less inflammatory phenotype. Since the immune system is also critical for identifying and eliminating malignant cells, immunosuppression from DMTs may predictably increase the risk of cancer development in MS patients. Compared with healthy controls, patients with autoimmune conditions, such as MS, may already have a higher risk of developing certain malignancies and this risk may further be magnified by DMT treatments. For those patients who develop both MS and cancer, these comorbid presentations create a challenge for clinicians on how to therapeutically address management of cancer in the context of MS autoimmunity. As there are currently no accepted guidelines for managing MS patients with prior history of or newly developed malignancy, we undertook this review to evaluate the molecular mechanisms of current DMTs and their potential for instigating and treating cancer in patients living with MS.

Familial multiple sclerosis patients have a shorter delay in diagnosis than sporadic cases

BACKGROUND

The diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS) is still complicated despite improvement in diagnostic guidelines. This means that time from first symptom to diagnosis in some cases is prolonged. Many aspects of MS aetiology are unknown, but the involvement of a genetic component is well established. This is also highlighted by the occurrence of familial MS cases, which represent 10-20% of all MS cases. We hypothesize that subsequent family members in a MS family, have a shorter time from onset of disease to diagnosis compared to sporadic MS cases. To investigate this, we have conducted a register study comparing time from onset to diagnosis in familial and sporadic MS cases.

METHODS

This is a nationwide register study based on information from the Danish Multiple Sclerosis Registry and the Danish Civil Registration System. We included familial (first-degree relatives) and sporadic MS cases and calculated time lag between onset and diagnosis of MS for sporadic MS cases and for1st, 2nd and 3rd family members within the MS families. Median test and Cox regression were the statistical methods used to compare the familial and sporadic groups.

RESULTS

We found that 2nd and 3rd affected family member had a significant shorter time from first symptom to diagnosis compared to sporadic MS cases (2nd family member: Hazard Ratio (HR): 1.12, CI: 1.03-1.21, p = 0.007 adjusted: HR: 0.95 p = 0.22, CI 0.89-1-03 and 3rd family member HR: 1.64 CI: 1.22-2.20, p = 0.001 adjusted model: HR: 1.70, p-value: 0.000, CI: 1.32-2.18). The same difference was not seen between 1st family members and sporadic cases (HR: 1.05, CI: 0.98-1.13, p = 0.15, adjusted: 0.98, p-value: 0.53, CI: 0.91-1.05). Estimated marginal mean delay in the four groups were 4.60 years (95% CI: 4.11-5.01) in1st family members, 4.23 years (3.71-4.75) in 2nd family members, 2.11 years (0.95-3.26) in 3rd family members and 4.99 years (4.99-4.99) in sporadic MS cases.

CONCLUSION

The 2nd and 3rd family members in MS families tend do get diagnosed faster than sporadic cases. This has implications in the diagnostic process of familial MS cases.

Glatiramer acetate: A complex drug beyond biologics

Complex drugs may be either biological, if the active ingredients are derived from a biological source, or non-biological, if obtained by chemical synthesis. In both cases, their quality depends considerably on the manufacturing process. In the case of Non Biological Complex Drugs (NBCDs), complexity may arise either from the active substance, as in the case of glatiramer acetate, or from other sources, such as the formulation, as in the case of liposomes. In this paper, the case of glatiramer acetate (GA) - a NBCD relevant for clinical and economic reasons - is considered and the differences between US and EU regulatory approaches to GA marketing authorization are highlighted. Indeed, though US and EU regulatory agencies have chosen a generic approach integrated with additional data the implementation is different in the two jurisdictions. In the US, the additional data required are listed in a product specific guideline and copies of Copaxone® have been approved as generics. In the EU, instead regulatory agencies followed a hybrid approach requiring an additional comparative study, and interchangeability policies and substitution schemes have been left to national agencies.

The Evolving Mechanisms of Action of Glatiramer Acetate

Glatiramer acetate (GA) is a synthetic amino acid copolymer that is approved for treatment of relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) and clinically isolated syndrome (CIS). GA reduces multiple sclerosis (MS) disease activity and has shown comparable efficacy with high-dose interferon-β. The mechanism of action (MOA) of GA has long been an enigma. Originally, it was recognized that GA treatment promoted expansion of GA-reactive T-helper 2 and regulatory T cells, and induced the release of neurotrophic factors. However, GA treatment influences both innate and adaptive immune compartments, and it is now recognized that antigen-presenting cells (APCs) are the initial cellular targets for GA. The anti-inflammatory (M2) APCs induced following treatment with GA are responsible for the induction of anti-inflammatory T cells that contribute to its therapeutic benefit. Here, we review studies that have shaped our current understanding of the MOA of GA.

Copies of nonbiological complex drugs: generic, hybrid or biosimilar?

The experience gained with biosimilars has made it clear that copies of complex drugs are more challenging to produce and put on the market than generics. In the case of so-called nonbiological complex drugs (NBCDs), the complexity can arise either from a complex active substance or by other factors, such as formulation or route of delivery. Regulatory policies in the USA and the EU for the marketing of NBCD copies are reviewed, using glatiramer acetate copies as a case study. In the USA, they are approved and marketed as generics (although needing additional data), and so they are interchangeable with the originator. In the EU, they are managed with a hybrid application, and their interchangeability and substitution are established by individual member states.

B cells and their cytokine activities implications in human diseases

B cells are the only cell type that can give rise to antibody-producing cells, and the only cell type whose selective depletion can, today, lead to an improvement of a wide range of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases, including disorders not primarily driven by autoantibodies. Here, I discuss this paradoxical observation, and propose that the capacity of B cells to act as cytokine-producing cells explains how they can control monocyte activity and subsequently disease pathogenesis. Together with current data on the effect of anti-CD20 B cell-depleting reagents in the clinic, this novel knowledge on B cell heterogeneity opens the way for novel safer and more efficient strategies to target B cells. The forthcoming identification of disease-relevant B cell subsets is awaited to permit their monitoring and specific targeting in a personalized medicine approach.

Pharmacogenetics of glatiramer acetate therapy for multiple sclerosis: the impact of genome-wide association studies identified disease risk loci

AIM

Association analysis of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) identified multiple sclerosis (MS) risk genetic variants with glatiramer acetate (GA) treatment efficacy.

PATIENTS & METHODS

SNPs in 17 GWAS-identified immune response loci were analyzed in 296 Russian MS patients as possible markers of optimal GA treatment response for at least 2 years.

RESULTS

Alleles/genotypes of EOMES, CLEC16A, IL22RA2, PVT1 and HLA-DRB1 were associated by themselves with event-free phenotype during GA treatment for at least 2 years (p _f  = 0.032 - 0.00092). The biallelic combinations including EOMES, CLEC16A, IL22RA2, PVT1, TYK2, CD6, IL7RA and IRF8 genes were associated with response to GA with increased significance level (p _f  = 0.0060 - 1.1 × 10^-5). The epistasic interactions or additive effects were observed between the components of the identified biallelic combinations.

CONCLUSION

We pinpointed the involvement of several GWAS-identified MS risk loci in GA therapy efficacy. These findings may be aggregated to predict the optimal GA response in MS patients.

Drugs approved for the treatment of multiple sclerosis: review of their safety profile

INTRODUCTION

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic immune-mediated inflammatory disorder of the brain and spinal cord characterized by inflammation, demyelination, and axonal degeneration. Area covered: Even though the pharmacological armamentarium for MS treatment is considerably improved in the last 20 years, safety data especially for the second-line and innovative treatments are lacking. In order to analyze the safety profile of drugs used for the treatment of MS, a literature review of pre-marketing, post-marketing studies and case reports was performed. Expert opinion: Nowadays, the numerous drugs approved in the last years for the treatment of MS allow a better control of the disease and a better patient compliance. The main advantages of the new disease-modifying agents for MS (DMTs), in fact, derive from the new oral administration and the prolonged half-life with consequent improvement in compliance compared to first-line therapy which required subcutaneous administrations. However, DMTs can cause serious, sometimes life-threatening or fatal, drug adverse reactions. Due to the lack of safety data and given the recent marketing approval of the last DMTs for MS, observational studies and post-marketing surveillance activities will be necessary in order to improve the knowledge about the safety profile of these drugs and the improvement of their use in clinical practice.

Interferons-beta versus glatiramer acetate for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Interferons-beta (IFNs-beta) and glatiramer acetate (GA) were the first two disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) approved 20 years ago for the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS). DMTs' prescription rates as first or switching therapies and their costs have both increased substantially over the past decade. As more DMTs become available, the choice of a specific DMT should reflect the risk/benefit profile, as well as the impact on quality of life. As MS cohorts enrolled in different studies can vary significantly, head-to-head trials are considered the best approach for gaining objective reliable data when two different drugs are compared. The purpose of this systematic review is to summarise available evidence on the comparative effectiveness of IFNs-beta and GA on disease course through the analysis of head-to-head trials.This is an update of the Cochrane review 'Interferons-beta versus glatiramer acetate for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis' (first published in the Cochrane Library 2014, Issue 7).

OBJECTIVES

To assess whether IFNs-beta and GA differ in terms of safety and efficacy in the treatment of people with relapsing-remitting (RR) MS.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Trials Register of the Cochrane Multiple Sclerosis and Rare Diseases of the CNS Group (08 August 2016) and the reference lists of retrieved articles. We contacted authors and pharmaceutical companies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing directly IFNs-beta versus GA in study participants affected by RRMS.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures as expected by Cochrane.

MAIN RESULTS

Six trials were included and five trials contributed to this review with data. A total of 2904 participants were randomly assigned to IFNs (1704) and GA (1200). The treatment duration was three years for one study, two years for the other four RCTs while one study was stopped early (after one year). The IFNs analysed in comparison with GA were IFN-beta 1b 250 mcg (two trials, 933 participants), IFN-beta 1a 44 mcg (three trials, 466 participants) and IFN-beta 1a 30 mcg (two trials, 305 participants). Enrolled participants were affected by active RRMS. All studies were at high risk for attrition bias. Three trials are still ongoing, one of them completed.Both therapies showed similar clinical efficacy at 24 months, given the primary outcome variables (number of participants with relapse (risk ratio (RR) 1.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.87 to 1.24) or progression (RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.35). However at 36 months, evidence from a single study suggests that relapse rates were higher in the group given IFNs than in the GA group (RR 1.40, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.74, P value 0.002).Secondary magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) outcomes analysis showed that effects on new or enlarging T2- or new contrast-enhancing T1 lesions at 24 months were similar (mean difference (MD) -0.15, 95% CI -0.68 to 0.39, and MD -0.14, 95% CI -0.30 to 0.02, respectively). However, the reduction in T2- and T1-weighted lesion volume was significantly greater in the groups given IFNs than in the GA groups (MD -0.58, 95% CI -0.99 to -0.18, P value 0.004, and MD -0.20, 95% CI -0.33 to -0.07, P value 0.003, respectively).The number of participants who dropped out of the study because of adverse events was similar in the two groups (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.40).The quality of evidence for primary outcomes was judged as moderate for clinical end points, but for safety and some MRI outcomes (number of active T2 lesions), quality was judged as low.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The effects of IFNs-beta and GA in the treatment of people with RRMS, including clinical (e.g. people with relapse, risk to progression) and MRI (Gd-enhancing lesions) measures, seem to be similar or to show only small differences. When MRI lesion load accrual is considered, the effect of the two treatments differs, in that IFNs-beta were found to limit the increase in lesion burden as compared with GA. Evidence was insufficient for a comparison of the effects of the two treatments on patient-reported outcomes, such as quality-of-life measures.

The Use of Oral Disease-Modifying Therapies in Multiple Sclerosis

Three oral disease-modifying drugs-fingolimod, teriflunomide, and dimethyl fumarate (DMF)-are available for treatment of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (MS). All three agents were approved in the last decade, primarily on the basis of a moderate to substantial reduction in the occurrence of MS relapses and central nervous system lesion formation detected by MRI. In the trials leading to approval, the first oral disease-modifying drug, fingolimod, reduced the annualized relapse rate (ARR) from 0.40 in placebo-treated patients to 0.18 (FREEDOMS) and from 0.33 in patients treated with interferon β1a intramuscularly to 0.16 (TRANSFORMS). Teriflunomide, approved on the basis of the two placebo-controlled trials TEMSO and TOWER, demonstrated a reduction in the ARR from 0.54 to 0.37 and from 0.50 to 0.32 respectively. The latest oral MS medication, approved in 2014, is DMF, which had been used in a different formulation for treatment of psoriasis for decades. In the 2-year DEFINE study, the proportion of patients with a relapse was reduced to 27 %, compared with 46 % in placebo arm, whereas in the CONFIRM trial, the ARR was reduced from 0.40 (placebo) to 0.22 in the DMF-treated group of patients. In this review, we will elucidate the mechanisms of action of these three medications and compare their efficacy, safety, and tolerability as a practical guideline for their use. We will further discuss effects other than relapse reduction these small molecules may exert, including potential activities within the central nervous system, and briefly summarize emerging data on new oral MS drugs in clinical development.

Differential glatiramer acetate treatment persistence in treatment-naive patients compared to patients previously treated with interferon

Background

In the treatment of multiple sclerosis, a change of therapy is considered after treatment failure or adverse events. Although disease modifying drugs’ (DMD) efficacy and side effects have been fully analysed in clinical trials, the effects of previous therapy use are less well studied. We aimed to study medication persistence with glatiramer acetate in treatment-naive patients and in patients previously treated with interferon.

Methods

A retrospective study of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients treated with glatiramer acetate in an MS Unit of a Spanish University Hospital (January 2004 – September 2013). Treatment time on glatiramer acetate was studied. Reasons for treatment discontinuation were considered as follows: lack of efficacy, serious adverse event, injection-related side effect, pregnancy and lost to follow-up. Use of prior DMD was registered and analysed. Homogeneity of groups was analysed using Fisher's and Mann-Whitney’s tests. The Kaplan Meier method and Cox regression model were used to estimate time to and risk of treatment discontinuation.

Results

In total, 155 relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients were treated with glatiramer acetate: 100 treatment-naive patients and 55 treated previously with interferon. At the end of the study, 76 patients (49.0 %) continued on glatiramer acetate (with an average treatment time (ATT) of 50.4 months, s.d.32.8) and 50 patients (32.3 %) had switched therapy: 27 patients (17.4 %) for inefficacy (ATT 29.2 months, s.d.17.5), 20 patients (12.9 %) for injection site reactions (ATT 16.5 months, s.d.20.3) and 3 patients (1.9 %) after serious adverse events (ATT 15.7 months, s.d.15.1). ATT in our cohort was 39 months (s.d.30.0), median follow-up 34 months. Six months after glatiramer acetate initiation, probability of persisting on GA was 91.4 %, 82.5 % after 12 months and 72.5 % after 2 years. The risk of glatiramer acetate treatment discontinuation was 2.8 [1.7 – 4.8] times greater for treatment-naive patients than for patients treated previously with interferon and this was hardly modified after adjusting for sex and age.

Conclusions

Glatiramer acetate was safe and useful with low rates of serious adverse events and low rates of break-through disease. Injection intolerance proved a major limitation to glatiramer acetate use. Patients who had been previously treated with interferons presented a lower probability of glatiramer acetate discontinuation than treatment-naive patients.

Glatiramer acetate guards against rapid memory decline during relapsing-remitting experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis

Cognitive decline presents a therapeutic challenge for patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), a disease characterized by recurrent autoimmune demyelination and by progressive CNS degeneration. Glatiramer acetate (GA, also known as Copolymer 1, Cop-1, or Copaxone), commonly used to treat MS, reduces the frequency of relapses; it has both anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective properties. However, clinical trials have not definitively shown that GA improves cognitive impairment during MS. Using an in vivo animal model of autoimmune demyelination, i.e., relapsing-remitting experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), we tested short-term memory in EAE mice (EAE), in EAE mice treated with GA for 10 days starting at the time of immunization (EAE + GA), and in age-matched healthy, naïve mice (Naïve). Short-term memory was assessed using the cross-maze test at 10, 20, and 30 days post-immunization (d.p.i.); data were analyzed at each time point and over time. At 10 d.p.i., EAE and EAE + GA mice had better memory function than Naïve mice. However, at the later time points, EAE mice had a steep negative slope of memory function (indicating decline), whereas EAE + GA mice had a flatter, less-negative slope of memory function. Notably, the memory function of EAE mice significantly decreased over time compared with that of Naïve mice, indicating that EAE had a negative impact on cognitive ability. In contrast, there was no statistically significant difference between the slopes of memory function in mice with EAE treated with GA versus Naïve mice, which revealed effective, albeit partial, protection by GA treatment against progressive memory decline during EAE disease. Of particular interest, although EAE mice had memory decline over 30 d.p.i., their clinical disease scores improved during that time. Thus, our results suggest that EAE mice had a significant progressive memory decline and that GA, administered at the time of immunization, partially guards against rapid memory decline.

Interferons-beta versus glatiramer acetate for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Interferons (IFNs)-beta and glatiramer acetate (GA) were the first two disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) approved 15 years ago for the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS). DMTs prescription rates as first or switching therapies and their costs have increased substantially over the past decade. As more DMTs become available, the choice of a specific DMT should reflect the risk/benefit profile, as well as the impact on quality profile. As MS cohorts enrolled in different studies can vary significantly, head-to-head trials are considered the best approach for gaining objective reliable data when two different drugs are compared. The purpose of this study is to summarise available evidence on the comparative effectiveness of IFNs-beta and GA on disease course through a systematic review of head-to-head trials.

OBJECTIVES

To assess whether IFNs-beta and GA differ in terms of safety and efficacy in the treatment of patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS).

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Trials Specialised Register of the Cochrane Multiple Sclerosis and Rare Diseases of the Central Nervous System Group (29 October 2013) and the reference lists of retrieved articles. We contacted trialists and pharmaceutical companies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing directly IFNs-beta versus GA in study participants affected by RRMS.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures as expected by The Cochrane Collaboration.

MAIN RESULTS

Five trials contributed to this review. A total of 2858 participants were randomly assigned to IFNs (1679) and GA (1179). The treatment duration was three years for one study and two years for the other four RCTs. The IFNs analysed in comparison with GA were IFN-beta 1b 250 mcg (two trials, 933 participants), IFN-beta 1a 44 mcg (two trials, 441 participants) and IFN-beta 1a 30 mcg (two trials, 305 participants). Enrolled participants were affected by active RRMS. All studies were at high risk for attrition bias.Both therapies showed similar clinical efficacy at 24 months, given the primary outcome variables (number of participants with relapse (risk ratio (RR) 1.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.87 to 1.24) or progression (RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.35)). However at 36 months, evidence from a single study suggests that relapse rates were higher in the group given IFNs than in the GA group (RR 1.40, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.7, P value 0.002).Secondary magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) outcomes analysis showed that effects on new or enlarging T2- or gadolinium (Gd)-enhancing lesions at 24 months were similar (mean difference (MD) -0.01, 95% CI -0.28 to 0.26, and MD -0.14, 95% CI -0.30 to 0.02, respectively). However, the reduction in T2- and T1-weighted lesion volume was significantly greater in the groups given IFNs than in the GA groups (MD -0.58, 95% CI -0.99 to -0.18, P value 0.004, and MD -0.20, 95% CI -0.33 to -0.07, P value 0.003, respectively).The number of participants who dropped out of the study because of adverse events was similar in the two groups (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.40).The quality of evidence for primary outcomes was judged as moderate for clinical end points, but for safety and some MRI outcomes (number of active T2 lesions), quality was judged as low.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The effects of IFNs-beta and GA in the treatment of patients with RRMS, including clinical (e.g. patients with relapse, risk to progression) and MRI (Gd-enhancing lesions) activity measures, seem to be similar or to show only small differences. When MRI lesion load accrual is considered, the effect of the two treatments differs, in that IFNs-beta were found to limit the increase in lesion burden as compared with GA. Evidence was insufficient for a comparison of the effects of the two treatments on patient-reported outcomes, such as quality of life measures.

Impact of delayed diagnosis and treatment in clinically isolated syndrome and multiple sclerosis

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a progressive inflammatory disease with several possible clinical courses; before the development of definite MS, some patients may have clinically isolated syndrome (CIS), which is a single attack of neurological symptoms caused by inflammation or demyelination. Disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) have been extensively used for the management of MS, resulting in improvements in the clinical presentation and decreases in MS-associated neurological damage. Earlier initiation of DMT in the course of MS is associated with better outcomes. For patients with CIS, initiation of interferon-beta or glatiramer acetate treatment after an initial clinical event indicative of MS has been associated with delays in the progression to clinically definite MS as well as improvements in measures of neurological damage via magnetic resonance imaging. The initiation of treatment for patients with CIS should be considered, and nurses play a vital role in educating patients about the risks of conversion to MS and the benefits of early DMT.

Oligodendrogenesis and myelinogenesis during postnatal development effect of glatiramer acetate

Myelinogenesis in the mammal nervous system occurs predominantly postnatally. Glatiramer acetate (GA), a drug for the treatment for multiple sclerosis (MS), has been shown to induce immunomodulation and neuroprotection in the inflamed CNS in MS and in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE). Here we investigated whether GA can affect myelinogenesis and oligodendrogenesis in the developing nervous system under nonpathological conditions. Towards this end we studied myelination in mice injected daily by GA, at postnatal Days 7-21. Immunohistological and ultrastructural analyses revealed significant elevation in the number of myelinated axons as well as in the thickness of the myelin encircling them and their resulting g-ratios, in spinal cords of GA-injected mice compared with their PBS-injected littermates, at postnatal Day 14. Elevation in myelinated axons was detected also in the peripheral ventral roots of the motor nerves. GA induced also an increase in axonal diameter, implying an effect on the overall development of the nervous system. A prominent elevation in the amount of progenitor oligodendrocytes and their BrdU incorporation, as well as in mature oligodendrocytes indicated that the effect of GA is linked to increased proliferation and differentiation along the oligodendroglial maturation cascade. In addition, elevation in insulin-like growth factor (IGF-1) and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) was found in the white matter of the GA-injected mice. Furthermore, a functional advantage in rotating rod test was exhibited by GA-injected mice over their littermates at postnatal Day 21. These cumulative findings corroborate the beneficial effect of GA on oligodendrogenesis and myelination.

Two decades of subcutaneous glatiramer acetate injection: current role of the standard dose, and new high-dose low-frequency glatiramer acetate in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis treatment

Glatiramer acetate, a synthetic amino acid polymer analog of myelin basic protein, is one of the first approved drugs for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Several clinical trials have shown consistent and sustained efficacy of glatiramer acetate 20 mg subcutaneously daily in reducing relapses and new demyelinating lesions on magnetic resonance imaging in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, as well as comparable efficacy to high-dose interferon beta. Some preclinical and clinical data suggest a neuroprotective role for glatiramer acetate in multiple sclerosis. Glatiramer acetate is associated with a relatively favorable side-effect profile, and importantly this was confirmed also during long-term use. Glatiramer acetate is the only multiple sclerosis treatment compound that has gained the US Food and Drug Administration pregnancy category B. All these data support its current use as a first-line treatment option for patients with clinical isolated syndrome or relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. More recent data have shown that high-dose glatiramer acetate (ie, 40 mg) given three times weekly is effective, safe, and well tolerated in the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, prompting the approval of this dosage in the US in early 2014. This high-dose, lower-frequency glatiramer acetate might represent a new, more convenient regimen of administration, and this might enhance patients' adherence to the treatment, crucial for optimal disease control.

New and emerging immune-targeted drugs for the treatment of multiple sclerosis

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a neurodegenerative disease with a major inflammatory component that constitutes the most common progressive and disabling neurological condition in young adults. Injectable immunomodulatory medicines such as interferon drugs and glatiramer acetate have dominated the MS market for over the past two decades but this situation is set to change. This is because of: (i) patent expirations, (ii) the introduction of natalizumab, which targets the interaction between leukocytes and the blood-CNS barrier, (iii) the launch of three oral immunomodulatory drugs (fingolimod, dimethyl fumarate and teriflunomide), with another (laquinimod) under regulatory review and (iv) a number of immunomodulatory monoclonal antibodies (alemtuzumab, daclizumab and ocrelizumab) about to enter the market. Current and emerging medicines are reviewed and their impact on people with MS considered.

Glatiramer acetate: a review of its use in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis and in delaying the onset of clinically definite multiple sclerosis

Glatiramer acetate (Copaxone(®)) is a synthetic analogue of the multiple sclerosis (MS)-associated antigen, myelin basic protein. Although its exact mechanisms of action in MS remain to be fully elucidated, the key mechanisms of action of glatiramer acetate appear to be modulation of the inflammatory response and neuroprotective and/or neuroregenerative effects. Subcutaneous glatiramer acetate is indicated for the treatment of adult patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) and the treatment of patients who have experienced a well-defined first clinical episode and have magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features consistent with MS or have been determined to be at high risk of developing clinically definite MS (CDMS). In clinical trials in patients with RRMS, glatiramer acetate reduced the frequency of relapses and reduced the burden and activity of disease on MRI, was more effective than placebo and showed generally similar efficacy to subcutaneous interferon (IFN) β-1a and IFNβ-1b. Furthermore, the beneficial effects of glatiramer acetate were sustained during up to 15 years of treatment in an extension study. In patients with clinically isolated syndrome (CIS), glatiramer acetate significantly delayed the onset of CDMS compared with placebo. The drug was generally well tolerated in these patient populations, with injection-site reactions being the most commonly occurring adverse events. Therefore, glatiramer acetate remains a valuable first-line option in the treatment of RRMS and is an option for delaying the onset of CDMS in patients with CIS.

The pharmacokinetics of glatiramer acetate for multiple sclerosis treatment

INTRODUCTION

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a T-cell-mediated disease affecting the central nervous system (CNS), characterized by demyelination and axonal degeneration. INF-β1b was the first drug approved for MS patients in 1993. In 1996, glatiramer acetate (GA), a synthetic copolymer, was approved in the USA for the treatment of relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) and clinically isolated syndrome (CIS). Although the immunological action of GA has been fully investigated, the exact mechanisms of action of GA are still not completely elucidated. Several in vitro studies on mice and human antigen-presenting cells (APCs) have shown that GA is able to bind to the major histocompatibility complex (MHC), on the surface of APCs, recognizing myelin basic protein (MBP).

AREAS COVERED

This review explores the pharmacological characteristics of GA, its mechanism of action and its pharmacokinetics properties. The article also provides information on the efficacy, tolerability and an overview of the most important clinical data on GA.

EXPERT OPINION

Despite the development of novel compounds, it is not surprising that GA is, to date, one of the most prescribed drugs for RRMS patients and CIS patients. The proven efficacy and the mild adverse events, makes GA a good therapeutic option in the early stage of the disease. This is particularly useful for patients who suffer flu-like symptoms from other RRMS therapies as an alternative.

Dimethyl fumarate : a Janus-faced substance?

INTRODUCTION

Dimethyl fumarate (DMF) has been used as fungicide, but oral DMF activates anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidative pathways that are beneficial in the treatment of psoriasis. BG-12, a specific formulation of DMF, has been approved very recently for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), which is characterized by both autoimmune lymphocytes leading to inflammation and mitochondrial alterations associated with oxidative stress.

AREAS COVERED

This review describes the pharmacokinetics and the mode of action of DMF, with a focus on molecular and cellular pathways, and discusses clinical results of DMF in RRMS treatment. To identify relevant publications, the author searched the PubMed database by using appropriate keywords and by searching for references cited within the obtained articles.

EXPERT OPINION

DMF demonstrated efficacy in several RRMS outcome measures related to disease activity and severity, but results on disability progression have been inconsistent. The overall safety profile might qualify DMF for long-term use, the frequency of side effects such as gastrointestinal complaints and flushing might hamper treatment adherence of MS patients. Since DMF covalently binds to intracellular proteins, the fate of this molecule in the body might need thorough long-term observation during clinical use.

Altered expression of the plasminogen activation pathway in peripheral blood mononuclear cells in multiple sclerosis: possible pathomechanism of matrix metalloproteinase activation

BACKGROUND

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune disorder where a breakdown in the integrity of the blood-brain barrier is thought to allow lymphocytes to enter the central nervous system.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to examine gene expression profiles between MS patients and healthy controls to identify genes intimately involved in the pathobiology of MS.

METHODS

Whole-genome gene expression analysis was performed using peripheral blood mononuclear cells from 39 healthy controls and 37 MS patients, 24 MS patients receiving no disease modifying therapy and 13 MS patients receiving interferon-beta (IFN-beta). Pathway analysis was performed to identify pathways dysregulated in MS.

RESULTS

Gene expression profiling of MS identified a signature of predominately immune associated genes. The plasminogen activation pathway contained an over-representation of significantly differentially expressed genes, including matrix metallopeptidase 9 (MMP9). Treatment with IFN-beta ameliorated the over-expression of MMP9, however the expression of two genes, plasminogen activator urokinase (PLAU) and serpin peptidase inhibitor, clade B (ovalbumin), member 2 (SERPINB2), forming part of the plasminogen activation pathway were not affected by IFN-beta therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

High expression levels of MMP9 have been associated with MS and the breakdown of the blood-brain barrier, while IFN-beta therapy decreases MMP9 expression. We confirm altered MMP9 expression in MS, and identify dysregulation within the plasminogen activation cascade, a pathway involved in the activation of MMP9.

Interferon beta and glatiramer acetate therapy

Interferon beta and glatiramer acetate have been mainstays of treatment in relapsingremitting multiple sclerosis for two decades. Remarkable advances in our understanding of immune function and dysfunction as well as increasingly sophisticated clinical trial design have stemmed from efforts to better understand these drugs. In this chapter, we review the history of their development and elaborate on known and theorized mechanisms of action. We describe the pivotal clinical trials that have led to their widespread use. We evaluate the clinical use of the drugs including tolerability, side effects, and efficacy measures. Finally, we look to the future of interferon beta and glatiramer acetate in the context of an ever growing armamentarium of treatments for relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis.

Multiple sclerosis and pregnancy: maternal considerations

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is the most commonly acquired neurological disorder affecting young adults of reproductive age with approximately a 3:1 female-to-male ratio. Pregnancy is not contraindicated in MS but remains to be an issue that raises many questions. Although relapse rates tend to increase in the first 3 months postpartum, pregnancy does not seem to be a detriment to the long-term progression of MS and has a protective effect on reducing relapses, especially during the third trimester. MS does not appear to affect fertility or increase the risk of congenital anomalies or pregnancy complications. There has been some evidence that maternal treatment with β interferons, the most commonly used disease-modifying therapies in MS, may cause adverse reproductive outcomes, prompting the US FDA to issue warnings about their use at conception and during pregnancy.

Clinical utility of glatiramer acetate in the management of relapse frequency in multiple sclerosis

Glatiramer acetate (GA) represents one of the most common disease-modifying therapies for multiple sclerosis. GA is currently approved for patients at high risk of developing clinically definite multiple sclerosis (CDMS) after having experienced a well-defined first clinical episode (clinically isolated syndrome or CIS) and for patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). GA’s efficacy and effectiveness to reduce relapse frequency have been proved in placebo-controlled and observational studies. Comparative trials have also confirmed the lack of significant differences over other choices of treatment in the management of relapse frequency, and long-term studies have supported its effect at extended periods of time. Additionally, RRMS patients with suboptimal response to interferon β may benefit from reduced relapse rate after switching to GA, and those with clinically isolated syndrome may benefit from delayed conversion to CDMS. All these results, together with its proven long-term safety and positive effect on patients’ daily living, support the favorable risk-benefit of GA for multiple sclerosis treatment.

Targeting NOX enzymes in the central nervous system: therapeutic opportunities

Among the pathogenic mechanisms underlying central nervous system (CNS) diseases, oxidative stress is almost invariably described. For this reason, numerous attempts have been made to decrease reactive oxygen species (ROS) with the administration of antioxidants as potential therapies for CNS disorders. However, such treatments have always failed in clinical trials. Targeting specific sources of reactive oxygen species in the CNS (e.g. NOX enzymes) represents an alternative promising option. Indeed, NOX enzymes are major generators of ROS, which regulate progression of CNS disorders as diverse as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, schizophrenia, Alzheimer disease, Parkinson disease, and stroke. On the other hand, in autoimmune demyelinating diseases, ROS generated by NOX enzymes are protective, presumably by dampening the specific immune response. In this review, we discuss the possibility of developing therapeutics targeting NADPH oxidase (NOX) enzymes for the treatment of different CNS pathologies. Specific compounds able to modulate the activation of NOX enzymes, and the consequent production of ROS, could fill the need for disease-modifying drugs for many incurable CNS pathologies.

Interferon-beta-1b-induced short- and long-term signatures of treatment activity in multiple sclerosis

Interferon beta (IFNβ) reduces disease burden in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. In this study, IFNβ-1b-treated MS patient gene expression profiles and biological knowledgebases were integrated to study IFNβ's pleiotropic mechanisms of action. Genes involved in immune regulation, mitochondrial fatty acid metabolism and antioxidant activity were discovered. Plausible mediators of neuronal preservation included NRF2, downregulation of OLA1, an antioxidant suppressor, and the antioxidant gene ND6, implicated in optic neuropathy and MS-like lesions. Network analysis highlighted IKBKE, which likely has a role in both viral response and energy metabolism. A comparative analysis of therapy-naive MS- and IFNβ-associated gene expression suggests an IFNβ insufficiency in MS. We observed more gene expression changes in long-term treatment than during acute dosing. These distinct short- and long-term effects were driven by different transcription factors. Multi-gene biomarker signatures of IFNβ treatment effects were developed and subsequently confirmed in independent IFNβ-1b-treated MS studies, but not in glatiramer acetate-treated patients.

Pharmacotherapeuetic Options for the Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis

Multiple sclerosis is the most common progressive and disabling neurological condition in young adults. Neuro-inflammation is an early and persistent change and forms the basis of most pharmacotherapy for this disease. Immunomodulatory drugs are mainly biologies (β-interferons, a four amino acid peptide, and a monoclonal antibody to a cell adhesion molecule on the blood-CNS barrier) that either attenuate the inflammatory response or block the movement of immune cells into the CNS. They reduce the rate of relapse, but have little or no effect on the progression of disability. The market landscape for MS drugs is in the midst of major change because the patent life of many of these medicines will soon expire, which will lead to the emergence of biosimilars. In addition, new small molecule immunomodulatory and palliative drugs have entered the market, with more in the pipeline; a number of monoclonal antibodies and other immunomodulatory drugs are also in clinical development.

Contribution of endermology to improving indurations and panniculitis/lipoatrophy at glatiramer acetate injection site

INTRODUCTION

Endermology is a mechanical massage therapy that enables fat mobilization and body contouring. The authors' aim was to assess the effect of endermology on indurations and panniculitis/lipoatrophy associated with subcutaneous administration of glatiramer acetate in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS).

METHODS

This was a multicenter pilot experience carried out in patients with MS treated with glatiramer acetate who showed indurations and/ or panniculitis/lipoatrophy at the injection site. Patients underwent endermology and glatiramer acetate treatment according to clinical practice. The primary endpoint was the change in indurations and/or panniculitis/lipoatrophy after 12 endermology sessions.

RESULTS

Between April and July 2011, a total of 13 evaluable patients were included (mean age, 40.7±3.1 years; female, 100%; white, 100%; mean MS duration, 10.1±2.3 years; previous MS treatment, 46.2%; mean glatiramer acetate treatment duration, 27.3±9.5 months). Eleven patients (84.6%) showed local indurations (mean diameter, 3.4±0.5 cm; mean number, 9.0±1.0) and six patients (46.2%) areas of panniculitis/ lipoatrophy (mean number, 5.0±1.1). After 12 endermology sessions, patients with indurations reported having experienced a reduction in size (10 patients [90.9%]; mean diameter, 0.1±0.05 cm; P<0.001) and number of indurations (nine patients [81.8%]; mean number, 2.3±1.1; P<0.005). These indurations completely disappeared from arms, thighs, buttocks, and abdomen in six (75.0%), six (75.0%), two (50.0%), and three (42.9%) patients, respectively. Three of these patients (27.3%) recovered from all indurations. Although panniculitis/lipoatrophy did not completely disappear, all patients reported improvements. Most patients with indurations (63.6%) felt very satisfied and considered endermology very useful for reducing indurations. All patients with panniculitis/lipoatrophy were satisfied and considered to be endermology useful in improving it. In addition, endermology enabled glatiramer acetate tolerance to be improved in most patients (60.0%).

CONCLUSION

Endermology may contribute to improving indurations and panniculitis/ lipoatrophy at the site of subcutaneous injection of glatiramer acetate in patients with MS, enabling areas of injection to recover, and treatment tolerance to increase.

Subcutaneous recombinant interferon-β-1a (Rebif®): a review of its use in the treatment of relapsing multiple sclerosis

Subcutaneous recombinant interferon-β-1a (SC IFNβ-1a) [Rebif®] is indicated as monotherapy for the prevention of relapses and progression of physical disability in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS). This article reviews the efficacy and tolerability of SC IFNβ-1a in this indication, with further discussion of its pharmacological properties and pertinent pharmacoeconomic studies. SC IFNβ-1a efficacy and tolerability were evaluated in randomized, double-blind, multinational trials in patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS). Its efficacy was demonstrated in the 2-year PRISMS trial, as SC IFNβ-1a 22 or 44 μg three times weekly (tiw) significantly reduced relapse rates, with an ≈30% relative risk reduction compared with placebo. SC IFNβ-1a was also associated with significantly delayed progression of disability, and lower disease activity according to MRI, relative to placebo. In the 24-week EVIDENCE trial, a significantly higher proportion of SC IFNβ-1a 44 μg tiw than intramuscular IFNβ-1a (Avonex®) 30 μg once weekly recipients remained relapse free. A serum-free formulation of SC IFNβ-1a 44 μg tiw was more efficacious than placebo in preventing the development of brain lesions in the 16-week IMPROVE trial. In the 96-week REGARD trial, the efficacy of SC IFNβ-1a 44 μg tiw was not significantly different to that of glatiramer acetate for clinical endpoints, although it was associated with reduced development of brain lesions compared with glatiramer acetate, according to some MRI endpoints. In the 36-month CAMMS223 trial, alemtuzumab led to significantly lower relapse rates and risk of developing sustained disability than SC IFNβ-1a 44 μg tiw, and was generally more efficacious according to other clinical and MRI endpoints. Across trials, influenza-like symptoms, injection-site reactions, haematological disturbances and hepatic enzyme abnormalities were the most common treatment-emergent adverse events occurring with SC IFNβ-1a. In the PRISMS trial, SC IFNβ-1a 22 and 44 μg tiw recipients had more injection-site reactions than placebo recipients and, at the higher dosage, haematological disturbances and increases in ALT levels were also significantly more frequent than with placebo. Pooled data from clinical trials and postmarketing surveillance indicate that haematological and hepatic adverse events are generally asymptomatic and rarely result in treatment discontinuation. Nevertheless, some cases of serious hepatic complications have been reported. In cost-utility studies, first-line therapies for RRMS, including SC IFNβ-1a, all exceeded commonly accepted US thresholds for incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-years gained relative to symptomatic treatment. However, because of patient need and the difficulty in adequately assessing cost utility in a gradually progressive disease, these agents have been made available to many patients worldwide through special access programmes. Overall, SC IFNβ-1a has a favourable risk-benefit ratio and is a valuable first-line treatment option for patients with relapsing MS.