Enhancing the practicality along with greenness sustainability of a high throughput HPLC-MS/MS bioanalytical method for the simultaneous determination of amlodipine, perindopril, and its active metabolite perindoprilat in human plasma: Application to a pharmacokinetic study

Numerous studies have demonstrated the benefits of amlodipine and perindopril combination therapy in decreasing blood pressure and improving outcomes for high-risk patients. In order to assess the pharmacokinetics of the 2 drugs along with perindoprilat; the active metabolite of perindopril, a simultaneous LC-MS/MS quantification method of amlodipine (AML), perindopril (PER) and perindoprilat (LAT) in human plasma has been developed and validated using amlodipine D4, perindopril D4 and perindoprilat D4 as internal standards (ISs), respectively. A simple and fast protein precipitation method was used to analyze the three analytes from K3EDTA human plasma. The chromatographic separation included the use of a mixture of methanol and acetonitrile (80:20, v/v) and 0.2 % aqueous formic acid (60:40, v/v) as a mobile phase pumped onto a Zorbax® SB-AQ C18 column. Detection was carried out using a tandem mass spectrometer (MS/MS) in multiple reactions monitoring (MRM) mode. This method exhibited great sensitivity (LLOQ of 0.2 ng/mL for AML and PER and 0.4 ng/mL for LAT), linearity, accuracy (ranging from 97.64 % to 110.28 %), precision (ranging from 2.54 % to 7.60 %), and stability. The method showed good linearity over the range of (0.2-10 ng/mL) for AML, (0.2-160 ng/mL) for PER and (0.4-80 ng/mL) for LAT. The average extraction recoveries of AML, PER and LAT samples were between 81.92 % and 85.07 %. Total elution time was as low as 3 min only. In addition, to ensure the practicality of the developed method, BAGI tool was applied, and the current method has achieved the highest score among the compared methods. Moreover, the sustainability of the proposed method was evaluated using AGREE tool and RGB 12 paradigm showing remarkable sustainability. The developed method is fast, accurate, sensitive, reproducible, ecofriendly, sustainable and suitable for the determination of the concentration of the cited analytes in human plasma. Moreover, it was applied for the bioequivalence study of a generic product to the innovator.

Time-Dependent Effects of Individual and Combined Treatments With Nebivolol, Lisinopril, and Valsartan on Blood Pressure and Vascular Reactivity to Angiotensin II and Norepinephrine

Clinical guidelines suggest the combination of 2 drugs as a strategy to treat hypertension. However, some antihypertensive combinations have been shown to be ineffective. Therefore, it is necessary to determine whether differences exist between the results of monotherapy and combination therapy by temporal monitoring of the responses to angiotensin II and norepinephrine, which are vasoconstrictors involved in the development of hypertension. Thus, the purpose of this work was to determine the vascular reactivity to angiotensin II and norepinephrine in spontaneously hypertensive rat (SHR) aortic rings after treatment with valsartan, lisinopril, nebivolol, nebivolol-lisinopril, and nebivolol-valsartan for different periods of time. In this study, male SHR and Wistar Kyoto normotensive (WKY) rats were divided into 7 groups treated for 1, 2, and 4 weeks: (1) WKY + vehicle, (2) SHR + vehicle; (3) SHR + nebivolol; (4) SHR + lisinopril; (5) SHR + valsartan; (6) SHR + nebivolol-lisinopril; and (7) SHR + nebivolol-valsartan. Blood pressure was measured by the tail-cuff method, and vascular reactivity was determined from the concentration-response curve to angiotensin II and norepinephrine in aortic rings. The results showed that the combined and individual treatments reduced mean blood pressure at all times evaluated. All treatments decreased vascular reactivity to angiotensin II; however, in the case of lisinopril and nebivolol-lisinopril, the effect observed was significant up to 2 weeks. All treatments decreased the reactivity to norepinephrine up to week 4. These results show a time-dependent difference in vascular reactivity between the pharmacological treatments, with nebivolol-valsartan and nebivolol-lisinopril being both effective combinations. Additionally, the results suggest crosstalk between the renin-angiotensin and sympathetic nervous systems to reduce blood pressure and to improve treatment efficacy.

Fixed and Low-Dose Combinations of Blood Pressure-Lowering Agents: For the Many or the Few?

Despite the widespread availability of several effective classes of drugs, systemic arterial hypertension remains poorly controlled in the majority of patients worldwide. In this article, we discuss the different modalities and effects of combination therapy and possible future research questions. Treatment with a single antihypertensive agent can effectively reduce blood pressure in only a limited number of patients, while most require therapy with two or more agents to achieve target levels. As initial therapy, American and European guidelines suggest a combination of two antihypertensive drugs and the use of a third antihypertensive drug when hypertension is still uncontrolled. Initial combination therapy is recommended in high-risk patients for an immediate blood pressure response, improved tolerability and possibly increased patient adherence. In addition to the potential benefits of combining different drug classes with synergistic pharmacological and physiological actions, this approach is useful for increasing the patient compliance with treatment, in particular if provided at fixed doses in a single pill. The minimisation of side effects is critical for the long-term treatment of a largely asymptomatic condition such as systemic hypertension. Low-dose combinations of different drugs from classes with complementary actions may provide the best ratio of lower side effects and improved tolerability with a significant blood pressure reduction, particularly in high-risk patients. This approach could be aided by a multidisciplinary lifestyle intervention on risk factors.

Immunotherapy a New Hope for Cancer Treatment: A Review

Cancer is a major burden of disease worldwide with considerable impact on society. The tide of immunotherapy has finally changed after decades of disappointing results and has become a clinically validated treatment for many cancers. Immunotherapy takes many forms in cancer treatment, including the adoptive transfer of ex vivo activated T cells, oncolytic viruses, natural killer cells, cancer vaccines and administration of antibodies or recombinant proteins that either costimulate cells or block the so-called immune checkpoint pathways. Recently, cancer immunotherapy has received a high degree of attention, which mainly contains the treatments for programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1), programmed death 1 (PD-1), chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) and cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4). Here, this paper reviewed the current understandings of the main strategies in cancer immunotherapy (adoptive cellular immunotherapy, immune checkpoint blockade, oncolytic viruses and cancer vaccines) and discuss the progress in the synergistic design of immune-targeting combination therapies.

Efficacy of Zofenopril vs. Irbesartan in Combination with a Thiazide Diuretic in Hypertensive Patients with Multiple Risk Factors not Controlled by a Previous Monotherapy: A Review of the Double-Blind, Randomized "Z" Studies

Combinations between an angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor or an angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) and hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) are among the recommended treatments for hypertensive patients uncontrolled by monotherapy. Four randomized, double-blind, parallel group studies with a similar design, including 1469 hypertensive patients uncontrolled by a previous monotherapy and with ≥1 cardiovascular risk factor, compared the efficacy of a combination of a sulfhydryl ACE inhibitor (zofenopril at 30 or 60 mg) or an ARB (irbesartan at 150 or 300 mg) plus HCTZ 12.5 mg. The extent of blood pressure (BP)-lowering was assessed in the office and over 24 h. Pleiotropic features of the treatments were evaluated by studying their effect on systemic inflammation, organ damage, arterial stiffness, and metabolic biochemical parameters. Both treatments similarly reduced office and ambulatory BPs after 18-24 weeks. In the ZODIAC study a larger reduction in high sensitivity C reactive protein (hs-CRP) was observed under zofenopril (-0.52 vs. +0.97 mg/dL under irbesartan, p = 0.001), suggesting a potential protective effect against the development of atherosclerosis. In the ZENITH study the rate of carotid plaque regression was significantly larger under zofenopril (32% vs. 16%; p = 0.047). In the diabetic patients of the ZAMES study, no adverse effects of treatments on blood glucose and lipids as well as an improvement of renal function were observed. In patients with isolated systolic hypertension of the ZEUS study, a slight and similar improvement in renal function and small reductions in pulse wave velocity (PWV), augmentation index (AI), and central systolic BP were documented with both treatments. Thus, the fixed combination of zofenopril and HCTZ may have a relevant place in the treatment of high-risk or monotherapy-treated uncontrolled hypertensive patients requiring a more prompt, intensive, and sustained BP reduction, in line with the recommendations of current guidelines.

Triple-combination therapy in the treatment of hypertension: a review of the evidence

Hypertension is a serious public health concern with inadequate control of blood pressure (BP) worldwide. Contributing factors include low efficacy of drugs, underuse of combination therapies, irrational combinations, physicians' therapeutic inertia and poor adherence to treatment. Current guidelines recommend the use of initial (dual) combination therapy in high-risk patients for immediate BP response, better short- and long-term BP control, and continued/improved patient adherence. This article aims to review the existing evidence of triple-combination therapies with respect to efficacy, safety and adherence to treatment. It is estimated that three drugs are required to achieve BP control in approximately one-fourth to one-third of patients. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have shown that triple combinations of amlodipine/valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide, amlodipine/olmesartan/hydrochlorothiazide and amlodipine/telmisartan/hydrochlorothiazide produce greater BP reductions, with greater proportions of patients achieving BP control compared with dual therapies. Further evidence also demonstrates that triple-combination therapy is efficacious for moderate to severe hypertension, with substantial additional BP reduction over dual regimens. Both RCTs and post-marketing observational studies have shown consistent and comparable efficacy in both the general population and high-risk hypertensive subgroups. Triple therapies are generally well tolerated with adverse event profiles similar to dual regimens. In addition, fixed-dose combinations used as single pill improve patient adherence leading to better long-term BP control. Depending on regional circumstances, they may also be cost effective. Thus, single-pill triple combinations of different classes of drugs with complementary mechanisms of action help to treat patients to goal with improved efficacy and better adherence to treatment.

Diagnosis and treatment of resistant hypertension

Hypertension resistant to lifestyle interventions and antihypertensive medications is a common problem encountered by physicians in everyday practice. It is most often defined as a blood pressure remaining ≥ 140/90 mmHg despite the regular intake of at least three drugs lowering blood pressure by different mechanisms, one of them being a diuretic. It now appears justified to include, unless contraindicated or not tolerated, a blocker of the renin-angiotensin system and a calcium channel blocker in this drug regimen, not only to gain antihypertensive efficacy, but also to prevent or regress target organ damage and delay the development of cardiorenal complications. A non-negligible fraction of treatment-resistant hypertension have normal "out of office" blood pressures. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and/or home blood pressure recording should therefore be routinely performed to identify patients with true resistant hypertension, i.e. patients who are more likely to benefit from treatment intensification.

Noradrenergic α₁ receptor antagonist treatment attenuates positive subjective effects of cocaine in humans: a randomized trial

Background

Preclinical research implicates dopaminergic and noradrenergic mechanisms in mediating the reinforcing effects of drugs of abuse, including cocaine. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of treatment with the noradrenergic α₁ receptor antagonist doxazosin on the positive subjective effects of cocaine.

Methods

Thirteen non-treatment seeking, cocaine-dependent volunteers completed this single-site, randomized, placebo-controlled, within-subjects study. In one study phase volunteers received placebo and in the other they received doxazosin, with the order counterbalanced across participants. Study medication was masked by over-encapsulating doxazosin tablets and matched placebo lactose served as the control. Study medication treatment was initiated at 1 mg doxazosin or equivalent number of placebo capsules PO/day and increased every three days by 1 mg. After receiving 4 mg doxazosin or equivalent number of placebo capsules participants received masked doses of 20 and 40 mg cocaine IV in that order with placebo saline randomly interspersed to maintain the blind.

Results

Doxazosin treatment was well tolerated and doxazosin alone produced minimal changes in heart rate and blood pressure. During treatment with placebo, cocaine produced dose-dependent increases in subjective effect ratings of “high”, “stimulated”, “like cocaine”, “desire cocaine”, “any drug effect”, and “likely to use cocaine if had access” (p<.001). Doxazosin treatment significantly attenuated the effects of 20 mg cocaine on ratings of “stimulated”, “like cocaine”, and “likely to use cocaine if had access” (p<.05). There were trends for doxazosin to reduce ratings of “stimulated”, “desire cocaine”, and “likely to use cocaine if had access” (p<.10).

Conclusions

Medications that block noradrenergic α₁ receptors, such as doxazosin, may be useful as treatments for cocaine dependence, and should be evaluated further.

Trial Registration

Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01062945

Combinations of inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin system with calcium channel blockers for the treatment of hypertension: focus on perindopril/amlodipine

BACKGROUND

Combination antihypertensive therapy with an inhibitor of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) and a calcium channel blocker (CCB) is a rational approach to achieve blood pressure (BP) goals in patients with hypertension, and may provide additional cardiovascular protection compared to other strategies in special populations. This article reviews the rationale for, and evidence supporting, the use of newer fixed-dose combinations of RAS inhibitors and CCBs, with particular emphasis on perindopril/amlodipine.

METHODS

A literature search was performed in Medline and EMBASE databases to identify articles published up to May 2010 describing the impact of combination treatment with angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB)/CCB or angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor/CCB based antihypertensive strategies on BP or clinical outcomes.

FINDINGS

A substantial body of evidence supports the BP-lowering efficacy of RAS inhibitor/CCB combination therapy in patients with hypertension. RAS inhibitors and CCBs represent two different and complementary mechanisms of actions; their use in combination is associated with effective BP lowering with favourable tolerability and fewer adverse metabolic effects than some other combination therapies. Currently, intervention studies demonstrating the impact of ARB/CCB combinations on cardiovascular mortality and morbidity are lacking. However, evidence from large outcome trials supports the use of ACE inhibitor/CCB combinations for reducing the risk of cardiovascular and renal events, particularly in high-risk patients. There is also evidence that the benefits of ACE inhibitor/CCB combinations may extend beyond those solely associated with brachial BP lowering, by an additional impact on central BP haemodynamics.

CONCLUSIONS

RAS inhibitor/CCB combination therapy is an effective antihypertensive therapy. Strong evidence supports the antihypertensive efficacy of ACE inhibitor/CCB combinations with cardioprotective and renoprotective properties. In particular, evidence suggests that fixed-dose perindopril/amlodipine effectively decreases BP and currently is the only RAS inhibitor/CCB combination proven to decrease all-cause and cardiovascular mortality as well as major cardiovascular events, and thus is a valuable option for the management of hypertension, especially in high-risk patients.