Clinical Profile, Complications and Trends of Ocular Anaesthesia in a Multi-tier Ophthalmology Network in India: An Eight-Year Experience

INTRODUCTION

To describe the clinical profile, complications and trends of ocular anaesthesia in a multi-tier ophthalmology network in India.

METHODS

This retrospective hospital-based study included 417,622 patients presenting between January 2013 and December 2020. Patients who were administered either topical, local or general anaesthesia for ocular surgery in at least one eye were included as cases. The data were collected using an electronic medical record system.

RESULTS

Among the 417,622 patients, local anaesthesia was administered to 280,638, (67.2%) patients and was the most commonly administered type followed by topical anaesthesia in 84,117 (20.14%) patients. The most common complication encountered in administering local anaesthesia was retrobulbar haemorrhage in 103 (0.037%) patients followed by lid haematoma in 49 (0.017%) patients. Tooth damage occurred in 40 (0.076%) patients followed by delayed recovery in 30 (0.057%) patients during general anaesthesia. The trend of local anaesthesia decreased (83.48% vs 53.36%), whereas the trend of topical anaesthesia increased (8.61% vs 32.42%) over the study period.

CONCLUSION

There is a notable trend towards the adoption of less invasive anaesthetic methods, particularly in common surgeries such as cataract, intravitreal injection, and vitreoretinal surgery. However, despite this trend, a significant proportion of oculoplastic/orbital surgeries, trauma, and strabismus surgeries continue to be performed under general anaesthesia. These observations underscore the ongoing evolution of ocular anaesthesia practices, reflecting advancements in surgical techniques and patient preferences.

Chloroprocaine 3% Gel as a Novel Ocular Topical Anesthetic: Results from a Multicenter, Randomized Clinical Trial in Patients Undergoing Cataract Surgery

Purpose: To compare the efficacy and safety of a novel ophthalmic anesthetic, chloroprocaine 3% gel to tetracaine 0.5% eye drops in patients undergoing cataract surgery with phacoemulsification. Methods: This was a prospective, randomized, multicenter, active-controlled, masked-observer, parallel group competitive equivalence study. The study comprised 338 patients having routine cataract extraction by clear corneal phacoemulsification, randomized to receive 3 drops of chloroprocaine gel (n = 166) or tetracaine eye drops (n = 172) before surgery. The primary objective of the study was to assess the equivalence of chloroprocaine gel to tetracaine eye drops as proportion of patients with successful ocular surface anesthesia, without any supplementation just before intraocular lens implantation. Safety measurements were pain, irritation, burning, stinging, photophobia, and foreign body sensation, graded by the patient and objective ocular signs. Results: Equivalence was demonstrated, with a somewhat higher success rate of chloroprocaine gel: 152/166 (92.0%) chloroprocaine versus 153/172 (90.5%) tetracaine patients achieved ocular surface anesthesia with no supplementation. Difference in proportions was 1.5% confidence interval [95% CI: (-3.6 to 6.6)] and 90% CI fell within (-10 to 10). Mean onset of anesthesia was 1.35 ± 0.87 min for chloroprocaine and 1.57 ± 1.85 for tetracaine (P = 0.083). Mean duration of anesthesia was 21.57 ± 12.26 min for chloroprocaine and 22.04 ± 12.58 for tetracaine (P = 0.574). No treatment emergent adverse events related to chloroprocaine were reported and no relevant findings related to local tolerance or vital signs were observed in both arms. Conclusions: Results obtained from the present cataract study demonstrated that chloroprocaine 3% ophthalmic gel is safe and effective, representing a valid alternative in ocular topical anesthesia. Clinical Trial Registration number: NCT04685538.

Topical and subconjunctival anesthesia versus topical anesthesia alone in patients with senile cataracts undergoing phacoemulsification: a double-blind randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

This study compared topical anesthesia to a combination of topical anesthesia and subconjunctival anesthesia for phacoemulsification.

METHODS

This double-blinded parallel placebo-controlled randomized trial involved senile cataract patients scheduled for phacoemulsification between May and December 2022. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either topical anesthesia with 0.5% tetracaine hydrochloride and subconjunctival balanced salt solution injection (Control group) or topical anesthesia and subconjunctival injection with 2% lidocaine (Lidocaine group). Baseline parameters, cataract grades, and various outcomes were recorded, including pain scores at specific time points, patient cooperation scores, requests for additional anesthesia, and complications. Statistical methods included Fisher's exact test, the t-test, ordinal logistic regression, and linear regression with robust standard errors.

RESULTS

In total, 176 patients were included in the study after excluding 33 patients. A significant reduction in immediate postoperative pain was achieved in the Lidocaine group (p < 0.001) and was maintained for 2 h (p = 0.011). Additionally, better cooperation was observed in this group (p = 0.038). However, patients in the Lidocaine group experienced more pain during the subconjunctival injection (p = 0.001) and a significant increase in subconjunctival hemorrhage related to the injection (p < 0.001). Despite this, the rates of surgical complications were comparable between the groups, and all phacoemulsification procedures were successfully completed using the assigned anesthetic technique.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of subconjunctival lidocaine injection to topical anesthesia reduced postoperative pain and improved patient cooperation during phacoemulsification. However, the lidocaine injection was painful, and it carried a higher risk of spontaneous-relief subconjunctival hemorrhage.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Trial Registration Number: TCTR20220804003, date of registration August 4, 2022, retrospectively registered.

Regional anaesthesia: what surgical procedures, what blocks and availability of a “block room”?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

With an expected rise in day care procedures with enhanced recovery programs, the use of specific regional anaesthesia can be useful. In this review, we will provide insight in the used regional block and medication so far known and its applicability in a day care setting.

RECENT FINDINGS

Regional anaesthesia has been improved with the aid of ultrasound-guided placement. However, it is not commonly used in the outpatient setting. Old, short acting local anaesthetics have found a second life and may be especially beneficial in the ambulatory setting replacing more long-acting local anaesthetics such as bupivacaine.To improve efficiency, a dedicated block room may facilitate the performance of regional anaesthesia. However, cost-efficacy for improved operating time, patient care and hospital efficiency has to be established.

SUMMARY

Regional anaesthesia has proven to be beneficial in ambulatory setting. Several short acting local anaesthetics are favourable over bupivacaine in the day care surgery. And if available, there are reports of the benefit of an additional block room used in a parallel (monitored) care of patients.

Patient preference and pain-reported outcomes for topical versus subtenon anesthetic for cataract surgery

PURPOSE:

Cataract extraction and lens implantation is the most common surgical procedure performed worldwide, with surgeons opting for either a topical or a subtenon anesthetic in majority of cases. While complication rates and pain scores have been previously examined in a bid to determine which modality was better, patients who have had both eyes operated upon under different techniques have never previously been asked which method they prefer. We undertook this study to fill in this crucial gap in our knowledge.

METHODS:

This is a retrospective study of patients who have undergone bilateral cataract surgery with one eye operated on with topical anesthesia and the other eye with subtenon anesthesia. Patients were identified who had had surgery undertaken in the previous 6 months at Singleton Hospital, Swansea, where both eyes had been operated upon using different anesthetic techniques. Telephone interviews with these patients were performed and their pain scores recorded on a scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain) for both eyes, with the patients then being asked which the method of anesthetic they preferred. Statistical analysis of pain scores was compared using Wilcoxon rank-sum testing.

RESULTS:

One hundred and fifty-two patients in total were identified. One hundred and forty-one of the applicable patients participated in the study. Of these, 78 patients received topical anesthesia for their first operation and 63 had subtenon block for their first operation. The mean pain scores reported for surgery with topical anesthesia and subtenon block were 2.30 and 1.38, respectively. The pain data were analyzed using a Wilcoxon signed-rank test, returning a z-score of 4.038. This result therefore suggests that patients experience statistically significantly less pain from cataract surgery when given a subtenon block. Patients expressed a preference for subtenon anesthesia, with 70% preferring subtenon block, 23% preferring topical anesthesia, and 7% having no preference.

CONCLUSIONS:

Patients report less pain with subtenon anesthesia compared with topical anesthesia in cataract surgery, where both eyes were operated upon with different anesthetic techniques. This is the first study in which patients who have had both anesthetic techniques performed independently for cataract surgery have had their pain scores reported and statistically analyzed.

Description of a novel ultrasound guided peribulbar block in horses: a cadaveric study

BACKGROUND

Standing surgery in horses combining intravenous sedatives, analgesics and local anaesthesia is becoming more popular. Ultrasound guided (USG) peribulbar nerve block (PB) has been described in dogs and humans for facial and ocular surgery, reducing the risk of complications versus retrobulbar nerve block (RB).

OBJECTIVE

To describe a technique for USG PB in horse cadavers.

METHODS

Landmarks and PB technique were described in two equine cadaver heads (Phase 1), with computed tomography (CT) imaging confirming contrast location and spread. In Phase 2, ten equine cadaver heads were randomised to two operators naïve to the USG PB, with moderate experience with ultrasonography and conventional "blind" RB. Both techniques were demonstrated once. Subsequently, operators performed five USG PB and five RB each, unassisted. Contrast location and spread were evaluated by CT. Injection site success was defined for USG PB as extraconal contrast, and for RB intraconal contrast.

RESULTS

Success was 10/10 for USG PB and 0/10 for RB (p < 0.001). Of the RB injections, eight resulted in extraconal contrast and two in the masseter muscle (p = 0.47).

CONCLUSIONS

The USG PB had a high injection site success rate compared with the RB technique; however, we cannot comment on clinical effect. The USG technique was easily learnt, and no potential complications were seen. The USG PB nerve block could have a wide application for use in horses for ocular surgeries (enucleations, eyelid, corneal, cataract surgeries, and ocular analgesia) due to reduced risk of iatrogenic damage. Further clinical studies are needed.

Comparison of four peribulbar anaesthetic techniques: a preliminary study in equine cadavers

OBJECTIVE

To compare the peribulbar injectate distribution and probability of regional anaesthesia of four peribulbar anaesthetic techniques in equine cadavers.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective experimental cadaver study.

ANIMALS

A total of 12 isolated equine cadaver heads and 24 eyes.

METHODS

The 24 orbits underwent one of four injection techniques (six orbits each) with a mixture (1:4) of contrast medium and saline (CM): 20 mL ventrolateral peribulbar injection (V-20), 20 mL dorsolateral peribulbar injection (D-20), combined ventrolateral and dorsolateral peribulbar injections 10 mL each (VD-20) or 20 mL each (VD-40). To evaluate and score CM distribution at the base of, within the extraocular muscle cone (EOMC), and around the optic nerve (before and after pressure application to the periorbital area), computed tomography was performed. To assess the probability of achieving locoregional anaesthesia, two criteria were applied and both scored as 'likely', 'possible' or 'unlikely'. To compare CM distribution scores between injection techniques, Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance was used. Mann-Whitney U test was used for post hoc comparisons between groups when needed. A p value < 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

The CM distribution within the EOMC and around the optic nerve circumference was detected as 'possible' only after pressure application in seven out of 24 orbits (V-20, 3; D-20, 1; VD-40, 3). It was never considered 'likely' either before or after pressure application. The CM distribution at the EOMC base was considered 'likely' to provide regional anaesthesia in 50% (V-20), 0% (D-20), 33% (VD-20), 100% (VD-40) and in 66% (V-20), 16% (D-20), 50% (VD-20), 100% (VD-40) before and after applying pressure, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Complete regional anaesthesia seems more likely using the VD-40 technique, although the authors advise caution due to the risk of potential complications. Future studies are necessary to evaluate the efficacy of the technique in vivo.

Outcomes and Adverse Events of Sub-Tenon's Anesthesia with the Use of a Flexible Cannula in 35,850 Refractive Lens Exchange/Cataract Procedures

Purpose

To describe our technique of sub-Tenon’s anesthesia and report adverse events and patient comfort.

Setting

Optical Express, United Kingdom.

Design

Retrospective case series.

Methods

The outcomes of 35,850 intraocular procedures (phacoemulsification and implantation of an intraocular lens) were retrospectively reviewed and the incidence of adverse events related to sub-Tenon’s anesthesia was calculated. On the first postoperative day, patients were asked to complete a questionnaire enquiring about their comfort during and after the procedure. The anesthetic solution consisted of a combination of Lidocaine and Hyaluronidase, which was administered into sub-Tenon’s space with a single-use sterile polyurethane 22G x 1” (0.9 x 25 mm) cannula. Mild conscious sedation (midazolam) was used during anesthetic and surgical procedure.

Results

No significant adverse events that would affect the posterior segment of the eye or result in vision loss were recorded. Subconjunctival haemorrhage related to sub-Tenon’s anesthesia was noted in 4.3% of eyes. Five minutes after the administration of sub-Tenon’s block, 80.6% of eyes had no chemosis, 14.8% had chemosis that affected only 1 quadrant of the eye and 4.5% of eyes had chemosis affecting 2 or more quadrants of the eye. Other adverse events included 14 cases of cyst/granuloma formation in the area of sub-Tenon’s incision and 7 eyes required suturing of the conjunctival cut. Of all patients, 93.2% experienced no or only mild discomfort during or after surgical procedure.

Conclusion

Sub-Tenon’s anesthesia with the use of a flexible cannula is a safe option for ophthalmic anesthesia. No sight-threatening adverse events occurred.

Patient Harm in Cataract Surgery: A Series of Adverse Events in Massachusetts

Massachusetts state agencies received reports of 37 adverse events (AEs) involving cataract surgery from 2011 to 2015. Fifteen were anesthesia related, including 5 wrong eye blocks, 3 cases of hemodynamic instability, 2 retrobulbar hematoma/hemorrhages, and 5 globe perforations resulting in permanent loss of vision. While Massachusetts' reported AEs likely underrepresent the true number of AEs that occur during cataract surgery, they do offer useful signal data to indicate the types of patient harm occurring during these procedures.

Integrated Pulmonary Index (IPI) monitorization under sedation in cataract surgery with phacoemulsification technique

PURPOSE

We aimed to investigate that change of IPI values after sedation of patients undergoing cataract surgery under sedation.

METHODS

We included 50 patients (ASA I-III) undergoing cataract surgery under sedation by phacoemulsification method in this prospective observational study. IPI, SpO₂, ETCO₂, respiratory rate (RR), peripheral pulse rate (PR), hemodynamic data and BIS values and perioperative complications were recorded.

RESULTS

Compared to baseline values, RR value at 5th min, RR, PR, IPI values at 10th min and RR, PR values at 15th min were significantly low and heart rate value at 15th min and arterial pressure, bispectral index (BIS) values at 5th min, 10th min, 15th min, 20th min, 25th min and 30th min were lower than baseline values.

CONCLUSIONS

IPI monitoring will provide guidance during sedation of patients with comorbid diseases undergoing cataract surgery by phacoemulsification method.

Preventing Adverse Events in Cataract Surgery: Recommendations From a Massachusetts Expert Panel

Massachusetts health care facilities reported a series of cataract surgery-related adverse events (AEs) to the state in recent years, including 5 globe perforations during eye blocks performed by 1 anesthesiologist in a single day. The Betsy Lehman Center for Patient Safety, a nonregulatory Massachusetts state agency, responded by convening an expert panel of frontline providers, patient safety experts, and patients to recommend strategies for mitigating patient harm during cataract surgery. The purpose of this article is to identify contributing factors to the cataract surgery AEs reported in Massachusetts and present the panel's recommended strategies to prevent them. Data from state-mandated serious reportable event reports were supplemented by online surveys of Massachusetts cataract surgery providers and semistructured interviews with key stakeholders and frontline staff. The panel identified 2 principal categories of contributing factors to the state's cataract surgery-related AEs: systems failures and choice of anesthesia technique. Systems failures included inadequate safety protocols (48.7% of contributing factors), communication challenges (18.4%), insufficient provider training (17.1%), and lack of standardization (15.8%). Choice of anesthesia technique involved the increased relative risk of needle-based eye blocks. The panel's surveys of Massachusetts cataract surgery providers show wide variation in anesthesia practices. While 45.5% of surgeons and 69.6% of facilities reported increased use of topical anesthesia compared to 10 years earlier, needle-based blocks were still used in 47.0% of cataract surgeries performed by surgeon respondents and 40.9% of those performed at respondent facilities. Using a modified Delphi approach, the panel recommended several strategies to prevent AEs during cataract surgery, including performing a distinct time-out with at least 2 care-team members before block administration; implementing standardized, facility-wide safety protocols, including a uniform site-marking policy; strengthening the credentialing and orientation of new, contracted and locum tenens anesthesia staff; ensuring adequate and documented training in block administration for any provider who is new to a facility, including at least 10 supervised blocks before practicing independently; using the least invasive form of anesthesia appropriate to the patient; and finally, adjusting anesthesia practices, including preferred techniques, as evidence-based best practices evolve. Future research should focus on evaluating the impact of these recommendations on patient outcomes.

Traumatic Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion With Retinal Neovascularization Following Inadvertent Retrobulbar Needle Perforation

Retrobulbar injection of anesthesia is one of the most common procedures performed for ophthalmic surgery. Complications are rare but can be potentially serious, including retrobulbar hemorrhage, brainstem anesthesia, and inadvertent globe perforation. This is the preliminary report describing branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) secondary to accidental retrobulbar needle laceration with subsequent preretinal neovascularization.

Sub-Tenon's anaesthesia versus topical anaesthesia for cataract surgery

BACKGROUND

Local anaesthesia for cataract surgery can be provided by sub-Tenon's or topical anaesthesia. Both techniques offer possible advantages. This review, which originally was published in 2007 and was updated in 2014, was undertaken to compare these two anaesthetic techniques.

OBJECTIVES

Our objectives were to compare the effectiveness of topical anaesthesia (with or without intracameral local anaesthetic) versus sub-Tenon's anaesthesia in providing pain relief during cataract surgery. We reviewed pain during administration of anaesthesia, postoperative pain, surgical satisfaction with operating conditions and patient satisfaction with pain relief provided, and we looked at associated complications.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE and EMBASE (last search in November 2014) and the reference lists of published articles. We looked for conferences abstracts and trials in progress and placed no constraints on language or publication status.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all randomized studies that compared sub-Tenon's anaesthesia versus topical anaesthesia for cataract surgery.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We assessed trial quality and extracted data in the format allowing maximal data inclusion.

MAIN RESULTS

We included eight studies in this updated review but could retain in the analysis only seven studies on 742 operated eyes of 617 participants. Two cross-over trials included 125 participants, and five parallel trials included 492 participants. These studies were published between 1997 and 2005. The mean age of participants varied from 71.5 years to 83.5 years. The female proportion of participants varied from 54% to 76%. Compared with sub-Tenon's anaesthesia, topical anaesthesia (with or without intracameral injection) for cataract surgery increases intraoperative pain but decreases postoperative pain at 24 hours. The amplitude of the effect (equivalent to 1.1 on a score from 0 to 10 for intraoperative pain, and to 0.2 on the same scale for postoperative pain at 24 hours), although statistically significant, was probably too small to be of clinical relevance. The quality of the evidence was rated as high for intraoperative pain and moderate for pain at 24 hours. We did find differences in pain during administration of local anaesthetic (low level of evidence), and indications that surgeon satisfaction (low level of evidence) and participant satisfaction (moderate level of evidence) were less with topical anaesthesia. There was not enough evidence to say that one technique would result in a higher or lower incidence of intraoperative complications compared with the other.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Both topical anaesthesia and sub-Tenon's anaesthesia are accepted and safe methods of providing anaesthesia for cataract surgery. An acceptable degree of intraoperative discomfort has to be expected with either of these techniques. Randomized controlled trials on the effects of various strategies to prevent intraoperative pain during cataract surgery could prove useful.

Foveal Pit Morphology Evaluation during Optical Biometry Measurements using a Full-Eye-Length Swept-Source OCT Scan Biometer Prototype

Purpose

To assess the scan quality of foveal pit morphology (FPM) and to quantify central retinal thickness (CRT) during routine optical biometry measurements with a full-eye-length swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) scan biometer prototype (IOLMaster700) and to compare these results with standard examinations using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) technique (Cirrus4000 SD-OCT).

Methods

As part of a SS-OCT scan protocol to measure biometric parameters for intraocular lens power calculation, central horizontal 1 mm retinal B scans were taken from phakic (group I) and pseudophakic (group II) nonvitrectomized eyes. To evaluate FPM, macular scans of either examination technique were subjectively analyzed and compared. Repeated CRT measurements were performed to analyze repeatability and consistency of IOLMaster700 recordings. These results were compared with CRT evaluations using SD-OCT.

Results

Overall, 146 eyes of 146 patients were included in this series. The subjective assessments of FPM are illustrated. Repeated CRT measurements (repeatability) with the IOLMaster700 disclosed an overall intraclass correlation of 0.57 (group I: 0.48; group II: 0.89). Overall coefficient of variation (accuracy) was calculated to be 12.43% (group I: 14.21%; group II: 5.66%). The comparison of CRT measurements between both devices showed significant differences in group I (p = 0.006).

Conclusions

Compared with SD-OCT, resolution of the 1 mm retinal B scan of SS-OCT scan biometry was lower. However, advanced pathologic characteristics were clearly discernible. Repeatability and accuracy of CRT measurements were acceptable though lower than with the standard SD-OCT technique. The CRT differed significantly in eyes of particular interest (group I) between both devices. The new scan could provide useful information for subsequent patient examination and further treatment planning for cataract surgery.

Comparing the effect of topical anesthesia and retrobulbar block with intravenous sedation on hemodynamic changes and satisfaction in patients undergoing cataract surgery (phaco method)

BACKGROUND

Cataract is one of the most common surgical procedures in the elderly. In most cases, the elderly have cardiac ischemia or chronic coronary diseases, which would lead to more ischemic events during general anesthesia. Therefore, surgeons and anesthetists prefer regional aesthesia to the general one owing to its more advantages and less complications.

OBJECTIVES

Therefore, this study aimed to compare topical method and retrobulbar block for pain intensity, patient's satisfaction, hemodynamic changes and intra and postoperative complications.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a single-blinded clinical trial, 114 patients scheduled for cataract surgery, aged 50 to 90 years with ASA physical status of I-III, were randomly assigned to two groups under monitored anesthesia care as topical anesthesia and retrobulbar block. After the injection of intravenous sedation, which was the combination of midazolam 0.5-1 mg with fentanyl 0.5-1 µ/kg, patients received retro bulbar block or topical anesthesia. During the operation, heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial blood pressure and arterial saturation of O2were measured every five minutes. In addition, pain (VAS) and satisfaction (ISAS) scores were recorded every 15 minutes, then at recovery and one hour after the ending of operation in the ward. Findings were statistically analyzed using SPSS 16.

RESULTS

In this study, no significant association was found between age, gender, education and physical condition of patients in both topical and retro bulbar block groups. Comparison of pain based on VAS, satisfaction based on ISAS score and MAP in the studied periods had no significant differences between the two groups of patients undergoing cataract surgery. However, significant differences were found between the two groups (P = 0.045, 0.02, 0.042 and P < 0.05) regarding heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure and arterial oxygen saturation percentage after 20-30 minutes of the operation.

CONCLUSIONS

Both methods, topical and retro bulbar block had similar impression in cataract surgery regarding analgesia and patient satisfaction. However, in non-complicated cataract surgeries with short duration, topical anesthesia may be the preferable method, because of non-invasiveness, appropriate analgesia, patient satisfaction and hemodynamic stability.

[Simplified anesthesia protocol for cataract surgery under topical anesthesia: one year retrospective study]

INTRODUCTION

The reduced supply of anesthesiologists in the hospital setting calls for a reconsideration of anesthesia management for ophthalmology patients. Therefore, a simplified management protocol has been designed through close collaboration between the involved specialists for cataract surgery under topical anesthesia (anesthetic eye drops or sub-Tenon's injection).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

At the conclusion of the visit confirming the need for surgery, the surgeon completes a questionnaire designed to elicit a history of the presence of diabetes mellitus (type I or II), prior organ transplantation, chronic renal insufficiency requiring dialysis, communication difficulties, psychiatric disorders, allergy and/or a complex cataract. If one of the items is positive, the patient is scheduled for a preoperative anesthesia consult. If all the items are negative, this anesthesia evaluation is waived. The surgeon explains the fasting requirement and how to take the patient's usual medications on the morning of surgery. The patient continues his/her medications. No lab tests or chest X-ray are performed. If necessary, the surgeon prescribes preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis and any other preparation. During the surgery, the patient receives IV fluids and is monitored via EKG, non-invasive blood pressure and pulse oxymetry by a certified nurse anesthetist. The anesthesiologist on duty (one per every four rooms) is immediately available for the slightest problem. The surgeon signs the postoperative anesthesia note and discharge order.

RESULTS

This procedure was assessed by one surgeon over a one year period, including 145 patients (60% of the patients recruited for this surgery), primarily outpatient (77%) under topical anesthesia (Oxybuprocaine(®)+Visthesia(®), Zeiss) or under sub-Tenon's injection (Xylocaïne(®)). No major complications were observed. Seven cases of arterial hypertension, treated with calcium channel blockers (nicardipine), and three episodes of brief anxiety were observed.

CONCLUSION

This simplified anesthesia protocol appears to be safe and effective but requires more demanding involvement of the surgeon, whose scope of competence and responsibility must naturally increase. This is the only way by which cataract surgery can remain competitive.

Are ocular injection anesthetic blocks obsolete? Indications and guidelines

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In this era of topical anesthesia for ocular surgery, anesthetic ocular blocks are still important when profound anesthesia and akinesia are required. Although injection ocular blocks, retrobulbar and peribulbar anesthesia, have been supplanted for most ocular surgery in many centers by sub-Tenon's irrigation block because of its superior safety profile, still worldwide, injection blocks remain popular.

RECENT FINDINGS

We present here the results of a survey of the literature published over the last 5 years to assess current international preferences for ocular anesthesia injection blocks. We discuss the reasons why sub-Tenon's anesthesia is not more universally popular and advocate for its greater acceptance because of safety. Specific narrow indications for performing injection ocular blocks are presented. Also, guidelines for performing retrobulbar anesthesia which reduce the risk of serious ocular complications are provided as well as our rationale for preferring retrobulbar to peribulbar anesthesia.

SUMMARY

Sub-Tenon's block should be performed in the operating theatre in preference to retrobulbar or peribulbar anesthesia except for limited indications. When injection ocular block is deemed necessary, we feel that retrobulbar anesthesia with the technique described may be safer than peribulbar anesthesia.