Cardiogenic Shock due to Pulseless Electrical Activity Arrest Associated with Severe Coronary Artery Spasm

Sudden cardiac arrest due to recurrent coronary spasm in a young woman: a case report

Background

Coronary artery spasm (CAS) is a pathological condition resulting from transient functional narrowing of the coronary arteries leading to myocardial ischaemia and in some rare cases even to sudden cardiac arrest (SCA). The most important preventable risk factor is use of tobacco, whereas possible precipitating factors include some medications and psychological stress.

Case summary

A 32-year-old woman was hospitalized with burning chest pain. The immediate investigations revealed the diagnosis of non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, because of ST elevations in one single lead and increased high-sensitivity troponin. Due to ongoing chest pain and a severe impaired left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 30% with apical akinesia, a prompt coronary angiography (CAG) was scheduled. After aspirin administration, she developed anaphylaxis with pulseless electrical activity (PEA). She could be resuscitated successfully. CAG revealed multi-vessel CAS for which she received calcium channel blockers. Five days after, she suffered from a second SCA due to ventricular fibrillation and was resuscitated again. Repeated CAG showed no critical coronary artery occlusion. LVEF improved progressively during hospitalization. Drug therapy was increased, and a subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) was implanted for secondary prevention.

Discussion

CAS may in some instances lead to SCA, especially in case of multi-vessel involvement. Allergic and anaphylactic events can trigger CAS, which are frequently underestimated. Regardless of the cause, cornerstone of CAS prophylaxes remains optimal medical therapy as in the avoidance of predisposing risk factors. In case of life-threatening arrhythmia, the implantation of an ICD should be considered.

Determinants of survival in sudden cardiac arrest manifesting with pulseless electrical activity

OBJECTIVE

The proportion of sudden cardiac arrests (SCA) manifesting with pulseless electrical activity (PEA) has increased significantly, and the survival rate remains lower than ventricular fibrillation (VF). However, a subgroup of PEA-SCA cases does survive and may yield key predictors of improved outcomes when compared to non-survivors. We aimed to identify key predictors of survival from PEA-SCA.

METHODS

Our study sample is drawn from two ongoing community-based, prospective studies of out-of-hospital SCA: Oregon SUDS from the Portland, OR metro area (Pop. approx. 1 million; 2002-2017) and Ventura PRESTO from Ventura County, CA (Pop. approx. 850,000, 2015-2021). For the present sub-study, we included SCA cases with PEA as the presenting rhythm where emergency medical services (EMS) personnel attempted resuscitation.

RESULTS

We identified 1,704 PEA-SCA cases, of which 173 (10.2%) were survivors and 1,531 (89.8%) non-survivors. Patients whose PEA-SCA occurred in a healthcare unit (16.9%) or public location (18.1%) had higher survival than those whose PEA-SCA occurred at home (9.3%) or in a care facility (5.7%). Young age, witness status, PEA-SCA location and pre-existing COPD/asthma were independent predictors of survival. Among witnessed cases the survival rate was 10% even if EMS response time was >10 minutes.

CONCLUSIONS

Key determinants for survival from PEA-SCA were young age, witnessed status, public location and pre-existing COPD/asthma. Survival outcomes in witnessed PEA cases were better than expected, even with delayed EMS response.

Coronary Artery Spasm-Related Heart Failure Syndrome: Literature Review

Although heart failure (HF) is a clinical syndrome that becomes worse over time, certain cases can be reversed with appropriate treatments. While coronary artery spasm (CAS) is still underappreciated and may be misdiagnosed, ischemia due to coronary artery disease and CAS is becoming the single most frequent cause of HF worldwide. CAS could lead to syncope, HF, arrhythmias, and myocardial ischemic syndromes such as asymptomatic ischemia, rest and/or effort angina, myocardial infarction, and sudden death. Albeit the clinical significance of asymptomatic CAS has been undervalued, affected individuals compared with those with classic Heberden's angina pectoris are at higher risk of syncope, life-threatening arrhythmias, and sudden death. As a result, a prompt diagnosis implements appropriate treatment strategies, which have significant life-changing consequences to prevent CAS-related complications, such as HF. Although an accurate diagnosis depends mainly on coronary angiography and provocative testing, clinical characteristics may help decision-making. Because the majority of CAS-related HF (CASHF) patients present with less severe phenotypes than overt HF, it underscores the importance of understanding risk factors correlated with CAS to prevent the future burden of HF. This narrative literature review summarises and discusses separately the epidemiology, clinical features, pathophysiology, and management of patients with CASHF.

Intra-brachial ergonovine, not acetylcholine, is associated with radial artery vasospasm in patients with coronary vasospasm

BACKGROUND

The intracoronary provocation test is expensive and may cause complications. Therefore, we investigated the sensitivity, specificity and safety of different drug- and dose-peripheral artery provocation tests in the diagnosis of coronary artery spasm (CAS).

METHODS

The patients who had repeated chest pain as well as both coronary and radial stenoses <50% were selected. These patients were divided into CAS group (n = 24) and control group (n = 33) after the intracoronary ergonovine provocation test. All patients underwent radial artery provocation tests at different dose-acetylcholine (200 µg, 400 µg and 800 µg) and ergonovine (60 µg, 100 µg and 160 µg). The predictive values of radial provocation tests for CAS diagnosis were analysed using receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves.

RESULTS

In radial acetylcholine provocation tests, 200 µg of acetylcholine failed to induce radial artery spasm, and the radial artery stenosis degree was not significantly different between the CAS group and control group at 400 µg and 800 µg of acetylcholine (all p > 0.05). In the radial artery ergonovine provocation tests, the radial artery stenosis degree was all significantly higher in the CAS group than in the control group at the three different doses (all p < 0.05). The specificity and sensitivity of radial ergonovine provocation tests were 90.91% and 50.00% at 60 µg, 96.97% and 66.67% at 100 µg, and 90.91% and 95.83% at 160 µg. Only the radial 160 µg-ergonovine provocation test caused CAS in one case.

CONCLUSION

The radial acetylcholine provocation test has no diagnostic value for CAS. The radial 160 µg-ergonovine provocation test has higher sensitivity and specificity for CAS diagnosis, but its safety should be paid attention to.

Survivors of Sudden Cardiac Arrest Presenting With Pulseless Electrical Activity: Clinical Substrate, Triggers, Long-Term Prognosis

BACKGROUND

The proportion of sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) presenting as pulseless electrical activity (PEA) is rising, and survival remains low. The pathophysiology of PEA-SCA is poorly understood, and current clinical practice lacks specific options for the management of survivors.

OBJECTIVES

In this study, the authors sought to investigate clinical profile, triggers, and long-term prognosis in survivors of SCA presenting with PEA.

METHODS

The community-based Oregon SUDS (Sudden Unexpected Death Study) (since 2002) and Ventura PRESTO (Prediction of Sudden Death in Multi-ethnic Communities) (since 2015) studies prospectively ascertain all out-of-hospital SCAs of likely cardiac etiology. Lifetime clinical history and detailed evaluation of SCA events is available. We evaluated all SCA survivors with PEA as the presenting rhythm.

RESULTS

The study population included 201 PEA-SCA survivors. Of these, 97 could be contacted for access to their clinical records. Among the latter, the mean age was 67 ± 17 years and 58 (60%) were male. After in-hospital examinations, 29 events (30%) were associated with acute myocardial infarction, and 5 (5%) had bradyarrhythmias. Among the remaining 63 patients (65%), specific triggers remained undetermined, although 31 (49%) had a previous history of heart failure. Of the 201 overall survivors, 91 (45%) were deceased after a mean follow-up of 4.2 ± 4.0 years. Survivors under the age of 40 years had an excellent long-term prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Survivors of PEA-SCA are a heterogeneous group with high prevalence of multiple comorbidities, especially heart failure. Surprisingly good long-term survival was observed in young individuals. Acute myocardial infarction as the precipitating event was common, but triggers remained undetermined in the majority. Provision of individualized care to PEA survivors requires a renewed investigative focus on PEA-SCA.

Clinical Characteristics and Prognosis of Patients with Multi-Vessel Coronary Spasm in Comparison with Those in Patients with Single-Vessel Coronary Spasm

(1) Background: We have sometimes experienced patients with vasospastic angina (VSA) who presented multi-vessel spasm (MVS) on coronary angiography and spasm provocation test (SPT). However, the clinical characteristics of VSA patients with MVS and the prognosis of such patients in the clinical setting have not been clarified. Therefore, we compared the clinical characteristics and prognosis in VSA patients with MVS with those in VSA patients with single-vessel spasm (SVS). (2) Methods: A total of 152 patients (mean age, 67 years, 74 men and 78 women) with VSA, in which the presence of coronary spasm was assessed in both left coronary artery (LCA) and right coronary artery (RCA) on SPT, were enrolled. We defined VSA as the presence of >90% narrowing of the epicardial coronary artery on angiograms, accompanied by usual chest symptoms and/or ischaemic ST-T changes on the electrocardiogram. On SPT, MVS was defined as the presence of spasms on ≥2 major coronary arteries. Based on the presence of MVS, patients were divided into the MVS group and the SVS group. The frequencies of conventional coronary risk factors, blood chemical parameters, average times of anginal attack, SPT findings such as spasm provocation induced by a low dose of acetylcholine (L-ACh) and total occlusion due to coronary spasm (TOC), number of coronary vasodilators at discharge and major cardiovascular events (MACE, including cardiac death and readmission due to any cause of cardiovascular diseases) were compared between the two groups. (3) Results: The MVS and SVS groups were comprised of 98 (64%) and 54 (36%) patients, respectively. The level of fasting blood glucose (FBS) was lower (p < 0.01), and the level of cystatin-C (n = 89) tended to be higher (p = 0.07) in the MVS group than in the SVS group. The frequencies of L-ACh-induced coronary spasm (33% in MVS and 17% in SVS, p = 0.04) and TOC (12% in MVS, 0% in SVS, p < 0.01) were higher in the MVS group than in the SVS group. The average number of coronary vasodilators at discharge was higher in the MVS group (1.2 ± 0.4) than in the SVS group (0.9 ± 0.5, p < 0.01). The frequency of MACE was not different between the two groups. (4) Conclusions: Patients with MVS may have higher VSA activity on SPT and have more aggressive medications, leading to a comparable prognosis in VSA patients with SVS. MVS is an important indicator of at least VSA activity, and cardiologists should confirm this in SPT whenever possible. Further studies should confirm whether lower FBS levels and higher cystatin-C levels are any markers of MVS.

Values of Radial Artery Provocation Tests at Different Doses of Ergonovine in the Diagnosis of Coronary Artery Spasm

The intracoronary drug provocation test has been the gold standard for diagnosis of coronary artery spasm (CAS); however, it has been identified with severe complications. In this study, we investigated the sensitivity, specificity, and safety of radial artery provocation test at different doses of ergonovine in the diagnosis of CAS. This study enrolled 57 patients, which were then divided into CAS group (n = 24) and control group (n = 33) after intracoronary ergonovine provocation test. All patients underwent radial artery provocation test at different doses of ergonovine. The predictive values of radial artery provocation test for the diagnosis of CAS were analyzed using receiver operator characteristic curve. In the radial artery provocation test at different doses of ergonovine, radial artery stenosis degree was all found to be significantly higher in the CAS group than in the control group (all P < 0.001). In the control group, significant differences were noted in the radial artery stenosis degree between different doses of ergonovine (all P < 0.05). In the CAS group, the radial artery stenosis degree was significantly higher in 160 μg and 100 μg of ergonovine than in 60 μg of ergonovine (all P < 0.001). The radial artery provocation test at 60 μg and 100 μg of ergonovine did not cause CAS, chest pain, and ECG ischemic changes. In the radial artery provocation test at 160 μg of ergonovine, some patients had CAS, chest pain, and ECG ischemic changes. The specificity and sensitivity of radial artery provocation test were 90.91% and 50.00% at 60 μg of ergonovine, 96.97% and 66.67% at 100 μg of ergonovine, and 90.91% and 95.83% at 160 μg of ergonovine for the diagnosis of CAS. As per our findings, we can conclude that the basic tension of radial artery increases in the CAS group. With the increase of ergonovine doses, its sensitivity and specificity improve, but its safety decreases. We will explore the most optimal dose of ergonovine in future studies.

Diagnosis of coronary artery spasm by ergonovine provocation test of radial artery

We investigated the sensitivity, specificity and safety of ergonovine provocation test of radial artery in the diagnosis of coronary artery spasm (CAS). The patients who came to our hospital for chest pain from January to June 2020 as well as had coronary stenosis < 50% and no radial artery stenosis, were enrolled in this study. These patients were divided into CAS group and control group after intracoronary ergonovine provocation test. All patients underwent ergonovine provocation test of radial artery, the inner diameter (D₀ and D₁) and the peak systolic velocities (PSV₀ and PSV₁) of the radial artery were measured by ultrasound before and after ergonovine provocation. The predictive value of ergonovine provocation test of radial artery for the diagnosis of CAS was analyzed using receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve. There were 19 patients in the CAS group and 28 patients in the control group. Low density lipoprotein cholesterol and smoking rate were significantly higher in the CAS group than in the control group (all P < 0.05), but there were no significant differences in other items (P > 0.05) between the two groups. In the ergonovine provocation test of radial artery, degree of radial artery stenosis was significantly higher in the CAS group [41.50% (35.60%, 50.00%)] than in the control group [11.25% (5.15%, 23.00%)] (P = 0.000), but there were no siginificant differences in D₀, PSV₀ and PSV₁ between the two groups (P > 0.05). The area under ROC curve of ergonovine (120 µg) provocation test of radial artery for the diagnosis of CAS was 0.912 with 95%CI: 0.792-0.975, P = 0.001, cut-off of 31%, specificity of 92.86% and sensitivity of 84.21%. The ergonovine (120 µg) provocation test of radial artery did not cause any adverse reactions. We concluded that the ergonovine provocation test of radial artery has high sensitivity, specificity and safety in the diagnosis of CAS.

Questionnaire in patients with aborted sudden cardiac death due to coronary spasm in Japan

OBJECTIVES

We investigated the medical or mechanical therapy, and the present knowledge of Japanese cardiologists about aborted sudden cardiac death (ASCD) due to coronary spasm.

METHODS

A questionnaire was developed regarding the number of cases of ASCD, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD), and medical therapy in ASCD patients due to coronary spasm. The questionnaire was sent to the Japanese general institutions at random in 204 cardiology hospitals.

RESULTS

The completed surveys were returned from 34 hospitals, giving a response rate of 16.7%. All SCD during the 5 years was observed in 5726 patients. SCD possibly due to coronary spasm was found in 808 patients (14.0%) and ASCD due to coronary spasm was observed in 169 patients (20.9%). In 169 patients with ASCD due to coronary spasm, one or two coronary vasodilators was administered in two-thirds of patients [113 patients (66.9%)], while more than 3 coronary vasodilators were found in 56 patients (33.1%). ICD was implanted in 117 patients with ASCD due to coronary spasm among these periods including 35 cases with subcutaneous ICD. Majority of cause of ASCD was ventricular fibrillation, whereas pulseless electrical activity was observed in 18 patients and complete atrioventricular block was recognized in 7 patients. Mean coronary vasodilator number in ASCD patients with ICD was significantly lower than that in those without ICD (2.1 ± 0.9 vs. 2.6 ± 1.0, p < 0.001). Although 16 institutions thought that the spasm provocation tests under the medications had some clinical usefulness of suppressing the next fatal arrhythmias, spasm provocation tests under the medication were performed in just 4 institutions.

CONCLUSIONS

In the real world, there was no fundamental strategy for patients with ASCD due to coronary spasm. Each institution has each strategy for these patients. Cardiologists should have the same strategy and the same knowledge about ASCD patients due to coronary spasm in the future.

Ventricular fibrillation survivor due to painless multiple spasm including left main trunk: is the subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator necessary?

A 52-year-old man was transferred to our hospital for ventricular fibrillation. He had no chest symptoms until then. After his full recovery, the administration of acetylcholine 20 μg showed the multiple spasm (left main trunk/left anterior descending artery/right coronary artery) without any chest symptoms or ischemic electrocardiographic changes. Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) was implanted because of no chest symptoms during his-daily-life. We performed the pharmacological spasm provocation tests under the abundant medications. Sequential spasm provocation test provoked just focal spasm at mid left anterior descending artery. We convinced that medications and S-ICD suppress the next fatal event. <Learning objective: LMT spasm may cause aborted SCD. Aggressive spasm provocation tests under the abundant medical therapy provoked spasm just at mid LAD artery focally in patient with VF survivor due to multiple spasm including LMT, while these medications blocked the LMT and RCA spasm. S-ICD implantation may be one of the selections in aborted SCD patients with silent LMT spasm under the abundant vasodilators in the future.>.

Myocardial Ischemic Syndromes, Heart Failure Syndromes, Electrocardiographic Abnormalities, Arrhythmic Syndromes and Angiographic Diagnosis of Coronary Artery Spasm: Literature Review

In coronary artery spasm (CAS), an excess coronary vasoconstriction causing total or subtotal vessel occlusion could lead to syncope, heart failure syndromes, arrhythmic syndromes, and myocardial ischemic syndromes including asymptomatic myocardial ischemia, stable and unstable angina, acute myocardial infarction, and sudden cardiac death. Although the clinical significance of CAS has been underrated because of the frequent absence of symptoms, affected patients appear to be at higher risk of syncope, serious arrhythmias, and sudden death than those with classic Heberden's angina pectoris. Therefore, a prompt diagnosis has important therapeutic implications, and is needed to avoid CAS-related complications. While a definitive diagnosis is based mainly on coronary angiography and provocative testing, clinical features may help guide decision-making. We perform a literature review to assess the past and current state of knowledge regarding the clinical features, electrocardiographic abnormalities and angiographic diagnosis of CAS, while a discussion of mechanisms is beyond the scope of this review.