Interventional Treatment for Giant Hepatic Hemangioma Accompanied by Arterio-portal Shunt with Ascites

Computed Tomography Fluoroscopy-Guided Percutaneous Transhepatic Bleomycin/Ethiodized Oil Sclerotherapy for Symptomatic Giant Hepatic Hemangioma

PURPOSE

To determine the safety and efficacy of computed tomography (CT) fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous transhepatic sclerotherapy with a bleomycin/ethiodized oil emulsion for symptomatic giant hepatic hemangiomas.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The procedure was performed on 22 patients with symptomatic giant hepatic hemangiomas in an outpatient setting between 2018 and 2020. All patients were followed clinically and underwent contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging after 1 month and again at a mean time of 15 months ± 2. Adverse events were classified according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE, v5.0), in which a severe adverse event was defined as an adverse event with a grade of ≥3. The desired radiologic response (volume and index size) and improvement of pain intensity (visual analog scale [VAS]) and other symptoms were recorded as outcomes.

RESULTS

Overall, patients showed a 36.4% ± 8.6 reduction in volume and a 14% ± 1.6 reduction in index size after 1 month, with P values of .002 and .001, respectively. The final follow-up volume and index size were 194.7 cm³ ± 25.8 and 77 mm ± 36, respectively. Moreover, a 53.0% ± 7 reduction in volume and 22% ± 3.7 reduction in index size during the final imaging were reported, with the P values of .001 and .001, respectively. Significant reductions in the mean pain intensity (90% of patients with lower VAS scores after intervention) and symptoms were reported. Four patients were classified as clinically unsuccessful, and were recommended further procedures for residual pain.

CONCLUSIONS

CT fluoroscopy-guided transhepatic sclerotherapy is an effective, safe, and minimally invasive method to manage giant hepatic hemangiomas in an outpatient setting.

Benign Liver Tumors

Background

Due to the frequent use of medical imaging including ultrasonography, the incidence of benign liver tumors has increased. There is a large variety of different solid benign liver tumors, of which hemangioma, focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH), and hepatocellular adenoma (HCA) are the most frequent. Advanced imaging techniques allow precise diagnosis in most of the patients, which reduces the need for biopsies only to limited cases. Patients with benign liver tumors are mostly asymptomatic and do not need any kind of treatment. Symptoms can be abdominal pain and pressure effects on adjacent structures. The 2 most serious complications are bleeding and malignant transformation.

Summary

This review focuses on hepatic hemangioma (HH), FNH, and HCA, and provides an overview on clinical presentations, surgical and interventional treatment, as well as conservative management. Treatment options for HHs, if indicated, include liver resection, radiofrequency ablation, and transarterial catheter embolization, and should be carefully weighed against possible complications. FNH is the most frequent benign liver tumor without any risk of malignant transformation, and treatment should only be restricted to symptomatic patients. HCA is associated with the use of oral contraceptives or other steroid medications. Unlike other benign liver tumors, HCA may be complicated by malignant transformation. HCAs have been divided into 6 subtypes based on molecular and pathological features with different risk of complication.

Key Message

The vast majority of benign liver tumors remain asymptomatic, do not increase in size, and rarely need treatment. Biopsies are usually not needed as accurate diagnosis can be obtained using modern imaging techniques.

Hepatic hemangioma: What internists need to know

Hepatic hemangioma (HH) is the most common benign liver tumor and it is usually found incidentally during radiological studies. This tumor arises from a vascular malformation; however, the pathophysiology has not been clearly elucidated. Symptoms usually correlate with the size and location of the tumor. Less commonly the presence of a large HH may cause life-threatening conditions. The diagnosis can be established by the identification of HH hallmarks in several imaging studies. In patients that present with abdominal symptoms other etiologies should be excluded first before attributing HH as the cause. In asymptomatic patient’s treatment is not required and follow up is usually reserved for HH of more than 5 cm. Symptomatic patients can be managed surgically or with other non-surgical modalities such as transcatheter arterial embolization or radiofrequency ablation. Enucleation surgery has shown to have fewer complications as compared to hepatectomy or other surgical techniques. Progression of the tumor is seen in less than 40%. Hormone stimulation may play a role in HH growth; however, there are no contraindications for hormonal therapy in patients with HH due to the lack of concrete evidence. When clinicians encounter this condition, they should discern between observation and surgical or non-surgical management based on the clinical presentation.