1
|
Faisal MS, Hussain I, Ikram MA, Shah SB, Rehman A, Iqbal W. Irinotecan dosing and pharmacogenomics: a comprehensive exploration based on UGT1A1 variants and emerging insights. J Chemother 2024:1-14. [PMID: 38706404 DOI: 10.1080/1120009x.2024.2349444] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2023] [Accepted: 04/24/2024] [Indexed: 05/07/2024]
Abstract
Irinotecan is a critical anticancer drug used to treat metastatic colorectal cancer and advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma by obstructing topoisomerase 1; however, it can cause minor-to-severe and life-threatening adverse effects. UDP glucuronosyltransferase family 1 member A1 (UGT1A1) polymorphisms increase the risk of irinotecan-induced neutropenia and diarrhea. Hence, screening for UGT1A1 polymorphisms before irinotecan-based chemotherapy is recommended to minimize toxicity, whereas liposomes offer the potential to deliver irinotecan with fewer side effects in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. This review presents a comprehensive overview of the effects of genotype-guided dosing of irinotecan on UGT1A1*28 and UGT1A1*6 variants, incorporating pharmacogenomic research, optimal regimens for metastatic colorectal and pancreatic cancer treatment using irinotecan, guidelines for toxicity reduction, and an evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of UGT1A1 genotype testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammad Saleem Faisal
- Department of Biological Sciences, International Islamic University, Islamabad, Pakistan
| | - Imran Hussain
- Department of Biological Sciences, International Islamic University, Islamabad, Pakistan
| | | | - Syed Babar Shah
- Department of Biological Sciences, International Islamic University, Islamabad, Pakistan
| | - Abdul Rehman
- Department of Biological Sciences, International Islamic University, Islamabad, Pakistan
| | - Wajid Iqbal
- Department of Biological Sciences, International Islamic University, Islamabad, Pakistan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
de Koning W, van Eijck CWF, van der Sijde F, Strijk GJ, Oostvogels AAM, Debets R, van Eijck CHJ, Mustafa DAM. Analyzing Flow Cytometry or Targeted Gene Expression Data Influences Clinical Discoveries-Profiling Blood Samples of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Patients. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4349. [PMID: 37686626 PMCID: PMC10486875 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15174349] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2023] [Revised: 08/21/2023] [Accepted: 08/24/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Monitoring the therapeutic response of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients is crucial to determine treatment strategies. Several studies have examined the effectiveness of FOLFIRINOX as a first-line treatment in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer, but little attention has been paid to the immunologic alterations in peripheral blood caused by this chemotherapy regimen. Furthermore, the influence of the measurement type (e.g., flow cytometry and targeted gene expression) on the clinical discoveries is unknown. Therefore, we aimed to scrutinize the influence of using flow cytometry or targeted immune gene expression to study the immunological changes in blood samples of PDAC patients who were treated with a single-cycle FOLFIRINOX combined with lipegfilgrastim (FFX-Lipeg). MATERIAL AND METHODS Whole-blood samples from 44 PDAC patients were collected at two time points: before the first FOLFIRINOX cycle and 14 days after the first cycle. EDTA blood tubes were used for multiplex flow cytometry analyses to quantify 18 immune cell populations and for complete blood count tests as the standard clinical routine. The flow cytometry data were analyzed with FlowJo software. In addition, Tempus blood tubes were used to isolate RNA and measure 1230 immune-related genes using NanoString Technology®. Data quality control, normalization, and analysis were performed using nSolver™ software and the Advanced Analysis module. RESULTS FFX-Lipeg treatment increased the number of neutrophils and monocytes, as shown by flow cytometry and complete blood count in concordance with elevated gene expression measured via targeted gene expression profiling analysis. Interestingly, flow cytometry analysis showed an increase in the number of B and T cells after treatment, while targeted gene expression analysis showed a decrease in B and T cell-specific gene expression. CONCLUSIONS Targeted gene expression complements flow cytometry analysis to provide a comprehensive understanding of the effects of FFX-Lipeg. Flow cytometry and targeted gene expression showed increases in neutrophils and monocytes after FFX-Lipeg. The number of lymphocytes is increased after treatment; nevertheless, their cell-specific gene expression levels are downregulated. This highlights that different techniques influence clinical discoveries. Therefore, it is important to carefully select the measurement technique used to study the effect of a treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Willem de Koning
- The Tumor Immuno-Pathology Laboratory, Department of Pathology & Clinical Bioinformatics, Erasmus University Medical Centre, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (W.d.K.)
- Clinical Bioinformatics Unit, Department of Pathology & Clinical Bioinformatics, Erasmus University Medical Centre, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Casper W. F. van Eijck
- The Tumor Immuno-Pathology Laboratory, Department of Pathology & Clinical Bioinformatics, Erasmus University Medical Centre, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (W.d.K.)
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Fleur van der Sijde
- The Tumor Immuno-Pathology Laboratory, Department of Pathology & Clinical Bioinformatics, Erasmus University Medical Centre, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (W.d.K.)
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Gaby J. Strijk
- The Tumor Immuno-Pathology Laboratory, Department of Pathology & Clinical Bioinformatics, Erasmus University Medical Centre, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (W.d.K.)
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Astrid A. M. Oostvogels
- Laboratory of Tumor Immunology, Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Reno Debets
- Laboratory of Tumor Immunology, Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Casper H. J. van Eijck
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dana A. M. Mustafa
- The Tumor Immuno-Pathology Laboratory, Department of Pathology & Clinical Bioinformatics, Erasmus University Medical Centre, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (W.d.K.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Canton C, Boussari O, Boulin M, Le Malicot K, Taieb J, Dahan L, Lopez A, Lepage C, Bachet JB. Impact of G-CSF Prophylaxis on Chemotherapy Dose-Intensity, Link Between Dose-Intensity and Survival in Patients with Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma. Oncologist 2022; 27:e571-e579. [PMID: 35289915 PMCID: PMC9255980 DOI: 10.1093/oncolo/oyac055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2021] [Accepted: 01/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma, few data are available on the use of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) prophylaxis and its impact on dose-intensity (DI), or the link between DI and progression-free survival (PFS). This study assessed the impact of G-CSF prophylaxis on the DI received by patients and the relationship between full DI and PFS according to chemotherapy regimens. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients from three first-line randomized phase II clinical trials were included in this retrospective cohort. G-CSF prophylaxis groups were identified and balanced according to baseline characteristics using a propensity score. Patients were classified into 2 treatment groups (FOLFIRINOX vs FOLFIRI/nab-paclitaxel (NAB)). DI was a binary variable (full/reduced). Adverse events were defined using NCI-CTCAE v4.0. RESULTS Of the 498 patients, 154 (31%) were in "prophylaxis" group; 179 (36%) were treated by FOLFIRINOX and 319 (64%) by FOLFIRI/NAB. In FOLFIRINOX group, G-CSF prophylaxis was significantly associated with a higher rate of full DI (OR, 5.07; 95% CI, 1.52-16.90; P < .01) while in FOLFIRI/NAB group, it was significantly associated with a lower rate of full DI (OR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.06-0.83; P = .03). Full DI was associated with a non-significant increase in PFS (FOLFIRINOX group: HR 0.83; 95% CI, 0.59-1.16; P = .27; FOLFIRI/NAB group: HR 0.84; 95% CI, 0.63-1.11; P = .22). CONCLUSION Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor prophylaxis was associated with a higher rate of full DI with FOLFIRINOX. Full DI was associated with a non-significant increase in PFS. These results need to be confirmed prospectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clémence Canton
- Department of Hepato-Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, University Hospital of Dijon, Dijon, France
- EPICAD INSERM LNC-UMR 1231 University of Burgundy and Franche-Comté, Dijon, France
| | - Olayidé Boussari
- EPICAD INSERM LNC-UMR 1231 University of Burgundy and Franche-Comté, Dijon, France
- Fédération Francophone de Cancérologie Digestive, Dijon, France
| | - Mathieu Boulin
- EPICAD INSERM LNC-UMR 1231 University of Burgundy and Franche-Comté, Dijon, France
- Department of Pharmacy, University Hospital of Dijon, Dijon, France
| | - Karine Le Malicot
- EPICAD INSERM LNC-UMR 1231 University of Burgundy and Franche-Comté, Dijon, France
- Fédération Francophone de Cancérologie Digestive, Dijon, France
| | - Julien Taieb
- Department of Hepato-Gastroenterology, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Carpem, Sorbonne Paris City, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France
| | - Laetitia Dahan
- Department of Hepato-Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, La Timone, AMU, Marseille, France
| | - Anthony Lopez
- Department of Hepato-Gastroenterology, University Hospital Nancy-Brabois, Nancy, France
| | - Come Lepage
- Department of Hepato-Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, University Hospital of Dijon, Dijon, France
- EPICAD INSERM LNC-UMR 1231 University of Burgundy and Franche-Comté, Dijon, France
| | - Jean-Baptiste Bachet
- Department of Hepato-Gastroenterology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Servetto A, Santaniello A, Napolitano F, Foschini F, Marciano R, Cascetta P, Amato AR, Augurio MR, Maresca L, De Placido P, De Placido S, Formisano L, Bianco R. FOLFIRINOX or nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: an observational study. Future Oncol 2022; 18:2643-2653. [PMID: 35608115 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2021-1142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim: Comparison of first-line FOLFIRINOX (FFN) and nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (NabGem) in patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Patients & methods: The authors analyzed data from 160 patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma receiving first-line FFN (n = 43) or NabGem (n = 117). Results: FFN and NabGem were similar in median progression-free survival (24.43 vs 26.28 weeks; hazard ratio [HR]: 0.88) and medial overall survival (47.43 vs 42.86 weeks; HR: 0.90). Of the 43 patients receiving FFN, 26 (60.4%) were treated with second-line NabGem; 14/117 (12.0%) patients receiving NabGem received second-line FFN (p < 0.0001). In the FFN → NabGem and NabGem → FFN groups, median overall survival was 51.2 and 71.6 weeks (HR: 0.69; p = 0.15). In patients receiving NabGem, second-line FFN, compared with FOLFOX/CAPOX or FOLFIRI, improved median progression-free survival 2 (25.6 vs 12.1 weeks; HR: 0.47; p = 0.0067) and median overall survival 2 (39.0 vs 19.14 weeks; HR: 0.49; p = 0.032). Conclusion: First-line FFN and NabGem promote similar clinical outcomes. Second-line FFN should be considered after NabGem.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Servetto
- Department of Clinical Medicine & Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, 80131, Italy
| | - Antonio Santaniello
- Department of Clinical Medicine & Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, 80131, Italy
| | - Fabiana Napolitano
- Department of Clinical Medicine & Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, 80131, Italy
| | - Francesca Foschini
- Department of Clinical Medicine & Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, 80131, Italy
| | - Roberta Marciano
- Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria San Giovanni di Dio Ruggi d'Aragona, Salerno, 84125, Italy
| | - Priscilla Cascetta
- Department of Clinical Medicine & Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, 80131, Italy
| | - Anna Rita Amato
- Department of Clinical Medicine & Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, 80131, Italy
| | - Maria Rosaria Augurio
- Department of Clinical Medicine & Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, 80131, Italy
| | - Lucia Maresca
- Department of Clinical Medicine & Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, 80131, Italy
| | - Pietro De Placido
- Department of Clinical Medicine & Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, 80131, Italy
| | - Sabino De Placido
- Department of Clinical Medicine & Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, 80131, Italy
| | - Luigi Formisano
- Department of Clinical Medicine & Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, 80131, Italy
| | - Roberto Bianco
- Department of Clinical Medicine & Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, 80131, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mei Q, Li X, Wang R, Qin K, Cheng Y, Cheng W, Dong Y, He Z, Li J, Li M, Tang X, Wang X, Xiao X, Yang B, Zhou Y, Wang R, Huang Q, Hu G, Li J. Efficacy and Safety for the Use of Half-Dosed Pegylated Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factors in Preventing Febrile Neutropenia During Chemotherapy in Patients With Malignant Tumors: A Multicenter, Open-Labeled, Single-Arm Phase 2 Trial. Front Oncol 2022; 12:820324. [PMID: 35574371 PMCID: PMC9095430 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.820324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2021] [Accepted: 03/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Prophylactic granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) has been shown to effectively prevent febrile neutropenia (FN) and grade 3/4 neutropenia during myelosuppressive treatment. The present study reports the clinical efficacy and safety of the prophylactic use of G-CSF with a half dose for cancer patients with an intermediate risk of FN combined with ≥1 patient-specific risk during multiple chemotherapy. Methods This multicenter, one-arm, and open-label clinical study involved 151 patients [median age, 54 years old (range, 46.0–62.5); 38.4% female] with malignant tumors, including >20 different cancers. These patients underwent a total of 604 cycles of chemotherapy and received a half dose of PEG-rhG-CSF administration prior to each cycle. Results The incidence rate of FN was 3.3% for this cohort during chemotherapy. Chemotherapy delay occurred in 6 (4.0%) patients for 12 (2.0%) cycles. Early termination of cancer treatment occurred in 14 (9.3%) patients. In this cohort, 23 (15.2%) patients required antibiotic use during courses of chemotherapy. A total of 28 (18.5%) patients experienced clear adverse effects during cancer treatment. Conclusion The prophylactic PEG-rhG-CSF with a half dose can both efficaciously and safely prevent neutropenia for patients of diverse cancers with an intermediate risk of FN combined with ≥1 patient-specific risk during chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qi Mei
- Department of Oncology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Hubei, China
| | - Xiaoyu Li
- Department of Oncology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Hubei, China
| | - Runkun Wang
- Department of Oncology, the First People's Hospital of Guangshui, Hubei, China
| | - Kai Qin
- Department of Oncology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Hubei, China
| | - Yi Cheng
- Department of Oncology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Hubei, China
| | - Weiting Cheng
- Department of Oncology, Wuhan No. 1 Hospital, Wuhan, China
| | - Youhong Dong
- Department of Oncology, Xiangyang No. 1 People's Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Hubei University of Medicine, Hubei, China
| | - Zhen He
- Department of Internal Medicine, Henan Cancer Hospital, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan, China
| | - Jun Li
- Department of Oncology, Xiaogan Central Hospital, Xiaogan, China
| | - Ming Li
- Department of Oncology, Wuhan Pulmonary Hospital, Wuhan, China
| | - Xi Tang
- Department of Oncology, Jingzhou Central Hospital, Hubei, China
| | - Xudong Wang
- Department of Oncology, Huangshi Central Hospital, Huangshi, China
| | - Xuxuan Xiao
- Department of Oncology, Wuhan No. 1 Hospital, Wuhan, China
| | - Bin Yang
- Department of Oncology, Hubei Cancer Hospital, TongJi Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Hubei, China
| | - Yajuan Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hubei Cancer Hospital, TongJi Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Hubei, China
| | - Rui Wang
- Department of Oncology, Wuhan No. 1 Hospital, Wuhan, China
| | - Qiao Huang
- Department of Oncology, The First College of Clinical Medical Science, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, China
| | - Guangyuan Hu
- Department of Oncology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Hubei, China
| | - Jian Li
- Institute of Molecular Medicine and Experimental Immunology, University Clinic of Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-University, Bonn, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Use of FOLFIRINOX or Nab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine for the Treatment of Locally Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Single Institution Observational Study. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13194939. [PMID: 34638422 PMCID: PMC8508515 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13194939] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2021] [Revised: 09/24/2021] [Accepted: 09/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary We performed a retrospective analysis to evaluate the effect of treatment with FOLFIRINOX (FFN) or Nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (GemNab) in patients with locally advanced (LA) pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Forty-eight percent of patients treated with FFN became eligible for radical resection, and twenty-two percent of patients receiving GemNab underwent surgery after neoadjuvant treatment. FFN treatment was associated with a better overall survival, compared with GemNab (mOS 85.1 vs. 54.3 weeks, FFN and GemNab, respectively; HR = 0.54; p = 0.0109). We found different toxicity profiles between the two chemotherapy regimens. Future randomized clinical trials are mandatory to clarify the best treatment in patients with LA PDAC. Abstract Patients with locally advanced (LA) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) do not present distant metastases but are not eligible for surgery upfront. Chemotherapy regimens, such as FOLFIRINOX (FFN) or nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (GemNab) in combination with loco-regional treatments are generally used in this setting. However, the best treatment choice is unknown. We retrospectively analyzed the information of 225 patients with stage II–III PDAC treated at our institution between October 2011 and December 2020. A total of 94 patients with LA PDAC who are non-eligible for surgery upfront received neoadjuvant FFN or GemNab. Of the 67 patients receiving FFN, 28 (41.8%) underwent surgery after neoadjuvant therapy. Of the 27 patients treated with GemNab, 6 (22.2%) became eligible for resection. The median overall survival (OS) was 85.1 weeks and 54.3 weeks in the FFN and GemNab groups, respectively (HR = 0.54, p = 0.0109). The median OS was 189.7 weeks and 76.4 weeks in the resected and unresected cohorts, respectively (HR = 0.25, p < 0.0001). Neutropenia (37.3%), anemia (6.0%), and diarrhea (6.0%) in the FFN group and neutropenia (22.2%) and thrombocytopenia (18.5%) in the GemNab groups were the most frequent grade 3–4 side effects. Higher rates of thrombocytosis (p < 0.0001) and peripheral edema (p < 0.0001) were observed in the GemNab group. Our results suggest that the use of FFN is associated with more favorable clinical outcomes than GemNab for patients with LA PDAC. Future randomized and controlled clinical trials are needed to further elucidate the role of these regimens and loco-regional treatments in this setting.
Collapse
|
7
|
Ikezawa K, Kiyota R, Takada R, Daiku K, Maeda S, Imai T, Abe Y, Kai Y, Yamai T, Fukutake N, Nakabori T, Ashida R, Uehara H, Tabuchi T, Katayama K, Ohkawa K. Efficacy and safety of modified fluorouracil/leucovorin plus irinotecan and oxaliplatin (mFOLFIRINOX) compared with S-1 as second-line chemotherapy in metastatic pancreatic cancer. JGH Open 2021; 5:679-685. [PMID: 34124386 PMCID: PMC8171163 DOI: 10.1002/jgh3.12555] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2021] [Revised: 04/22/2021] [Accepted: 04/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM The optimal standard second-line chemotherapy for metastatic pancreatic cancer (MPC) remains unclear. Here, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of modified fluorouracil/leucovorin plus irinotecan and oxaliplatin (mFOLFIRINOX) compared with oral fluoropyrimidine S-1 as a second-line chemotherapy in patients with MPC. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed 76 consecutive patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma who underwent mFOLFIRINOX or S-1 treatment as a second-line chemotherapy after gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) failure at our department between December 2014 and February 2019. RESULTS Patients who underwent mFOLFIRINOX treatment exhibited significantly better objective response rates (ORRs) and progression-free survival (PFS) than S-1 (ORR, 20.0% vs 0%, P = 0.003; PFS, 3.7 vs 2.1 months, P = 0.010). Although baseline patient characteristics of age, performance status, and serum albumin levels differed significantly between the two groups, mFOLFIRINOX was identified as an independent factor of favorable PFS on multivariate analyses. Grade 3-4 neutropenia and peripheral sensory neuropathy occurred more frequently in the mFOLFIRINOX group. The median overall survival from the initiation of second-line chemotherapy was not significantly longer in the mFOLFIRINOX group than in the S1 group (8.5 vs 5.8 months, respectively; P = 0.213); however, the 8-month survival rate was significantly higher in the mFOLFIRINOX group (56.0% vs 27.5%, respectively; P = 0.030). CONCLUSIONS mFOLFIRINOX as a second-line regimen contributed to favorable treatment outcomes, but induced more frequent adverse events than S-1. On multivariate analyses, mFOLFIRINOX was identified as an independent factor with favorable PFS, suggesting that mFOLFIRINOX could be a promising treatment option for patients with GnP failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenji Ikezawa
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic OncologyOsaka International Cancer InstituteOsakaJapan
| | - Ryosuke Kiyota
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic OncologyOsaka International Cancer InstituteOsakaJapan
| | - Ryoji Takada
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic OncologyOsaka International Cancer InstituteOsakaJapan
| | - Kazuma Daiku
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic OncologyOsaka International Cancer InstituteOsakaJapan
| | - Shingo Maeda
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic OncologyOsaka International Cancer InstituteOsakaJapan
| | - Toshihiro Imai
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic OncologyOsaka International Cancer InstituteOsakaJapan
| | - Yutaro Abe
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic OncologyOsaka International Cancer InstituteOsakaJapan
| | - Yugo Kai
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic OncologyOsaka International Cancer InstituteOsakaJapan
| | - Takuo Yamai
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic OncologyOsaka International Cancer InstituteOsakaJapan
| | - Nobuyasu Fukutake
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic OncologyOsaka International Cancer InstituteOsakaJapan
| | - Tasuku Nakabori
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic OncologyOsaka International Cancer InstituteOsakaJapan
| | - Reiko Ashida
- Department of Cancer Survey and Gastrointestinal OncologyOsaka International Cancer InstituteOsakaJapan
| | - Hiroyuki Uehara
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic OncologyOsaka International Cancer InstituteOsakaJapan
| | - Takahiro Tabuchi
- Cancer Control CenterOsaka International Cancer InstituteOsakaJapan
| | - Kazuhiro Katayama
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic OncologyOsaka International Cancer InstituteOsakaJapan
| | - Kazuyoshi Ohkawa
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic OncologyOsaka International Cancer InstituteOsakaJapan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kitagawa Y, Osumi H, Shinozaki E, Ota Y, Nakayama I, Suzuki T, Wakatsuki T, Ogura M, Ooki A, Takahari D, Suenaga M, Chin K, Yamaguchi K. Clinical utility of polyethylene glycol conjugated granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (PEG-G-CSF) for preventing severe neutropenia in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab: a single-center retrospective study. BMC Cancer 2020; 20:358. [PMID: 32345249 PMCID: PMC7189469 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-06864-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2019] [Accepted: 04/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and the safety of polyethylene glycol conjugated granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (PEG-G-CSF) for preventing neutropenia in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients that received fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI) plus bevacizumab (Bev) in clinical practice. Methods We retrospectively analyzed mCRC patients who received FOLFOXIRI plus Bev between December 2015 and December 2017. We evaluated the efficacy of PEG-G-CSF as preventing or treating grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, the overall response rate (ORR) according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events of FOLFOXIRI plus Bev based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. Results A total of 26 patients (median age 53.5 years) were included. The ORR rate was 65.3%, the median PFS was 9.6 months (7.2–16.9), and the median OS was 24.2 months (13.6–NA). Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia occurred in 53.8% of the patients, and febrile neutropenia occurred in 7.7%. PEG-G-CSF was given to 77.0% of the patients, including prophylactically (n = 9) and after the development of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (n = 11). No patients experienced grade 3 or 4 neutropenia after the administration of PEG-G-CSF. In seven of the nine patients who received PEG-G-CSF prophylactically (77.8%), no dose adjustment was required. Conclusions PEG-G-CSF is useful in preventing severe neutropenia in mCRC patients treated with FOLFOXIRI plus Bev.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yusuke Kitagawa
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan
| | - Hiroki Osumi
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan
| | - Eiji Shinozaki
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan.
| | - Yumiko Ota
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan
| | - Izuma Nakayama
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan
| | - Takeshi Suzuki
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan
| | - Takeru Wakatsuki
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan
| | - Mariko Ogura
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan
| | - Akira Ooki
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan
| | - Daisuke Takahari
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan
| | - Mitsukuni Suenaga
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan
| | - Keisho Chin
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan
| | - Kensei Yamaguchi
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Affiliation(s)
- Peng Chen
- Department of Pharmacy, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, P.R. China
| | - Jiexin Lei
- Department of Endocrinology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, P.R. China
| | - Yue Wu
- Department of Pharmacy, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, P.R. China
| | - Benhong Zhou
- Department of Pharmacy, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|