Comparison between Patients with Chest Infection due to Klebsiella spp. and Streptococcus pneumoniae

Community-Acquired Pneumonia: Postpandemic, Not Post-COVID-19

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic upended our approach to imaging community-acquired pneumonia, and this will alter our diagnostic algorithms for years to come. In light of these changes, it is worthwhile to consider several postpandemic scenarios of community-acquired pneumonia: (1) patient with pneumonia and recent positive COVID-19 testing; (2) patient with air space opacities and history of prior COVID-19 pneumonia (weeks earlier); (3) multifocal pneumonia with negative or unknown COVID-19 status; and (4) lobar or sublobar pneumonia with negative or unknown COVID-19 status. In the setting of positive COVID-19 testing and typical radiologic findings, the diagnosis of COVID-19 pneumonia is generally secure. The diagnosis prompts vigilance for thromboembolic disease acutely and, in severely ill patients, for invasive fungal disease. Persistent or recurrent air space opacities following COVID-19 infection may more often represent organizing pneumonia than secondary infection. When COVID-19 status is unknown or negative, widespread airway-centric disease suggests infection with mycoplasma, Haemophilus influenzae, or several respiratory viruses. Necrotizing pneumonia favors infection with pneumococcus, Staphylococcus, Klebsiella, and anaerobes. Lobar or sublobar pneumonia will continue to suggest the diagnosis of pneumococcus or consideration of other pathogens in the setting of local outbreaks. A positive COVID-19 test accompanied by these imaging patterns may suggest coinfection with one of the above pathogens, or when the prevalence of COVID-19 is very low, a false positive COVID-19 test. Clinicians may still proceed with testing for COVID-19 when radiologic patterns are atypical for COVID-19, dependent on the patient's exposure history and the local epidemiology of the virus.

Genomic characterization of a new phage BUCT541 against Klebsiella pneumoniae K1-ST23 and efficacy assessment in mouse and Galleria mellonella larvae

Over the past decades, the spread of multi-drug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (MDR-KP) is becoming a new threat and new effective therapies against this pathogen are needed. Bacteriophage (phage) therapy is considered to be a promising alternative treatment for MDR-KP infections compared with antibacterial drug usage. Here, we reported a new phage BUCT541 which can lyse MDR-KP ST23. The genome of BUCT541 is a double-stranded linear 46,100-bp long DNA molecule with 48% GC content through the Next generation sequencing (NGS) data. A total of 81 open reading frames and no virulence or antimicrobial resistance genes are annotated in the BUCT541 genome. BUCT541 was able to lyse 7 of the 30 tested MDR-KP according to the host range analysis. And the seven sensitive strains belonged to the K. pneumoniae K1-ST23. BUCT541 exhibited high thermal stability (4–70°C) and broad pH tolerance (pH 3-11) in the stability test. The in vivo results showed that BUCT541 (4 × 10⁵ plaque-forming units (PFU)/each) significantly increased the survival rate of K. pneumoniae infected Galleria mellonella from 5.3% to 83.3% within 48 h. Moreover, in the mouse lung infection model, high doses of BUCT541 (2 × 10⁷ PFU/each) cured 100% of BALB/c mice that were infected with K. pneumoniae. After 30 h of treatment with phage BUCT541 of the multiplicity of infection (MOI) = 10, the K. pneumoniae in the lungs of mice was lower than 10⁴ CFU/mL, compared to the control group 10⁹ CFU/mL. Together, these findings indicate that phage BUCT541 holds great promise as an alternative therapy with excellent stability and a wide lysis range for the treatment of MDR-KP ST23 infection.

Case Report: Next-Generation Sequencing in Diagnosis of Atypical Aspiration Pneumonia

Since the pandemic of Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), especially in the centers most affected, the symptoms such as fever, cough, myalgia or fatigue, and radioactive signs typically related to COVID-19 like ground-glass opacity (GGO) often distract the attention of physicians from other diseases. Aspiration pneumonia and COVID-19 share similarities in some aspects. There may be risk of misdiagnosis in the case of considering radiological patterns of pneumonia. Early diagnosis and treatment often greatly improve prognosis. We herein reported a case of 40-year-old patient who underwent chest CT scan with the discovery of ground-glass opacity, intralobular reticular opacity and interlobular septal thickening, consolidation, and air bronchogram sign, which were mainly located in the middle and upper lobes of the right lung. It was considered to be infection related pneumonia based on the negative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) result of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The next-generation sequencing (NGS) of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) was performed and detected nucleic acid sequences of Klebsiella sp. Consequently, the patient accepted sensitive intravenous antibiotics therapy for 13 days and had a remarkable clinical and radiological improvement. His case was followed up through imaging procedures. Because of possible radiologic and clinical similarities between aspiration and COVID-19 pneumonia, COVID-19 can be of some value in proposing a differential diagnosis of aspiration pneumonia. Clinicians could suggest a correct diagnosis by careful examination of the CT images together with attention to the clinical history and judicious utilization of NGS, especially.

The Association Between Pleural Empyema and Peripheral Arterial Disease in Younger Patients: A Retrospective National Population-Based Cohort Study

Background: To investigate the relationship between pleural empyema (PE) and peripheral arterial disease (PAD).

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from the National Health Institute Research Database. Univariable and multivariable Cox's proportional hazard regressions were performed to investigate the association between PE and the risk of PAD. Kaplan–Meier method and the differences were assessed using a log-rank test.

Results: The overall incidence of PAD was higher in the PE cohort than in the non-PE cohort (2.76 vs. 1.72 per 1,000 person-years) with a crude hazard ratio (HR) of 1.61 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.41–1.83]. After adjustment for age, gender, and comorbidities, patients with PE were noted to be associated with an increased risk of PAD compared with those without PE [adjusted HR (aHR) = 1.18, 95% CI = 1.03–1.35]. Regarding the age-specific comparison between the PE and non-PE cohorts, PAD was noted to be significantly high in the ≤ 49 years age group (aHR = 5.34, 95% CI = 2.34–10.1). The incidence of PAD was higher in the first 2 years, with an aHR of 1.35 (95% CI = 1.09–1.68) for patients with PE compared with those without PE.

Conclusion: The risk of PAD was higher if patients with PE were younger than 49 years and within the 2-year diagnosis of PE.