Problems in pharmacological evaluation of patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: clinical analysis of more than 100 consecutive patients

Asymptomatic atrial fibrillation: demographic features and prognostic information from the Atrial Fibrillation Follow-up Investigation of Rhythm Management (AFFIRM) study

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) may occur without symptoms. Little is known about demographic features and prognostic information in patients with asymptomatic AF.

METHODS

In the AFFIRM study, 4060 patients were randomized to either rhythm or rate control. At baseline, patients were identified as asymptomatic if they answered "no" to a 15-item questionnaire related to cardiac symptoms during AF in the 6 months before study entry.

RESULTS

There were 481 (12%) asymptomatic patients at baseline. Compared with symptomatic patients, asymptomatic patients were more often men and had a lower incidence of coronary artery disease and congestive heart failure, but had more cerebrovascular events. Asymptomatic patients had a longer duration of AF, a lower maximum heart rate, and better left ventricular function. They received fewer cardiac medications and fewer therapies to maintain sinus rhythm. At 5 years, there was a trend for better survival in asymptomatic patients (81% vs 77%, P = .058), and they were more likely to be free from disabling stroke or anoxic encephalopathy, major bleeding, and cardiac arrest (79% vs 67%, P = .024). However, mortality and major events were similar after correction for baseline differences.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with asymptomatic AF have less serious heart disease but more cerebrovascular disease. Asymptomatic patients receive different therapies than symptomatic patients. However, the absence of symptoms and the differences in treatment does not confer a more favorable prognosis when differences in baseline clinical parameters are considered. Anticoagulation should be considered in these patients.

Is dual site better than single site atrial pacing in the prevention of atrial fibrillation?

Long-term prevention of atrial fibrillation is not constantly realized by single-site right atrial pacing, and the beneficial role of multisite atrial pacing is still being studied. Accordingly, we compared the effectiveness of dual site and single site atrial pacing in 83 patients (50 men, 33 women, aged 69 +/- 10 years), who received a DDD device for primary sinus node dysfunction or bradycardia with documented atrial fibrillation. Inclusion criteria for dual site pacing were a sinus P wave > or = 120 ms and at least two episodes of documented paroxysmal AF in the 6 months preceding implantation. Dual site atrial pacing (high right atrium-coronary sinus ostium) was performed in 30 cases, and was compared to 53 single site paced patients, 21 with a P wave > or = 120 ms and 32 with a P wave < 120 ms. The basic pacing rate was programmed at 68 +/- 4 beats/min (range 60-75 beats/min). Sinus P wave (133 +/- 20 vs 95 +/- 9 ms; P < 0.001), paced P wave (107 +/- 14 vs 99 +/- 15; P < 0.05), number of antiarrhythmic drugs used (2.4 +/- 1.2 vs 1.6 +/- 1.5, P < 0.05), and the duration of symptoms (8.1 +/- 4.5 vs 3.8 +/- 2.4 years; P < 0.001) were significantly higher in dual site patients. The other characteristics were similar. During the follow-up of 18 +/- 15 months (range 3-30 months), paroxysmal AF was documented in 33 patients. Among these patients, 13 developed permanent AF following at least one episode of paroxysmal AF. When comparing dual site patients and single site patients with a P wave duration > or = 120 ms, paroxysmal AF incidence was lower in the dual site group (9/30 patients vs 15/21 patients, P < 0.01), as well as permanent AF (1/30 patients vs 8/21 patients, P < 0.01). By contrast, comparison between dual site patients and the group of single site patients with a P wave duration < 120 ms did not evidence any significant differences in paroxysmal (9/30 patients vs 9/32 patients) and permanent (1/30 patients vs 4/32 patients) AF incidences. Dual site seems better able than single site atrial pacing to improve the natural history of patients with a prolonged P wave, reducing the incidence of paroxysmal and permanent AF. No benefit could be expected in patients with a normal P wave duration.