Changes in CCR2 chemokine receptor expression and plasma MCP-1 concentration after the implantation of bare metal stents versus sirolimus-eluting stents in patients with stable angina

The multiple roles of chemokines in the mechanisms of stent biocompatibility

While the advent of drug-eluting stents has been clinically effective in substantially reducing the rates of major stent-related adverse events compared with bare metal stents, vascular biological problems such as neointimal hyperplasia, delayed re-endothelialization, late stent thrombosis are not eliminated and, increasingly, neoatherosclerosis is the underlying mechanism for very late stent failure. Further understanding regarding the mechanisms underlying the biological responses to stent deployment is therefore required so that new and improved therapies can be developed. This review will discuss the accumulating evidence that the chemokines, small inflammatory proteins, play a role in each key biological process of stent biocompatibility. It will address the chemokine system in its specialized roles in regulating the multiple facets of vascular biocompatibility including neointimal hyperplasia, endothelial progenitor cell (EPC) mobilization and re-endothelialization after vascular injury, platelet activation and thrombosis, as well as neoatherosclerosis. The evidence in this review suggests that chemokine-targeting strategies may be effective in controlling the pathobiological processes that lead to stent failure. Preclinical studies provide evidence that inhibition of specific chemokines and/or broad-spectrum inhibition of the CC-chemokine class prevents neointimal hyperplasia, reduces thrombosis and suppresses the development of neoatherosclerosis. In contrast, however, to these apparent deleterious effects of chemokines on stent biocompatibility, the CXC chemokine, CXCL12, is essential for the mobilization and recruitment of EPCs that make important contributions to re-endothelialization post-stent deployment. This suggests that future chemokine inhibition strategies would need to be correctly targeted so that all key stent biocompatibility areas could be addressed, without compromising important adaptive biological responses.

Incidence and Predictors of the In-stent Restenosis after Vertebral Artery Ostium Stenting

BACKGROUND

The incidence and predictors for in-stent restenosis (ISR) was not fully explored. We aim to investigate the incidence and predictors of ISR after stenting at the origin of vertebral artery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two hundred and six patients with 229 stents implantation between July 1, 2005 and July 31, 2015 were included in the study. All patients underwent conventional clinical and angiographic (digital subtraction angiography) follow-up at around 6 months post procedure. ISR was defined as greater than 50% stenosis within or immediately (within 5 mm) adjacent to the stent. Multivariate Cox regression analyses were utilized to investigate the predictors for ISR.

RESULTS

The ISR was found in 30 patients (30/206, 14.6%) with 31 lesions (31/229, 13.5%) with the mean follow-up duration of 11.1-month (range: 3 - 92 months). Stent diameter (hazard ratio 0.504, 95% confidence interval 0.294 - 0.864) was an independent predictor for ISR.

CONCLUSION

ISR rate after Vertebral artery ostium stent placement is acceptable, which was conversely associated with the stent diameter.

Soluble adhesion molecules in patients with acute coronary syndrome after percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-coated balloon, drug-eluting stent or bare metal stent

Adhesion molecules play an important role in inflammation, atherosclerosis and coronary artery disease (CAD). These molecules are expressed on the surface of dysfunctional endothelial cells, causing inflammatory cells from the circulation to adhere and migrate through the endothelium. Their expression is upregulated in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The contact between stent struts and endothelium upregulates endothelial cell gene expression, endothelial cell activation and inflammation. The paclitaxel or sirolimus eluting stents inhibited expression of adhesion molecules in several studies and reduced the incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) after drug-eluting stent (DES) over bare metal stent (BMS) implantation. Therefore, we propose that elevated serum levels of the soluble adhesion molecules after primary PCI in patients treated with BMS or DES implantation versus drug-coated balloon (DCB) application to the vulnerable coronary plaque might be a predictor of MACE and further adverse outcomes. Consequently, DCB-only strategy in patients with ACS might be a superior approach in comparison to BMS implantation and non-inferior approach when compared to DES implantation.

Rapamycin limits the growth of established experimental abdominal aortic aneurysms

OBJECTIVES

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a chronic inflammatory disease affecting 4-8% of men older than 60 years. No pharmacologic strategies limit disease progression, aneurysm rupture, or aneurysm-related death. We examined the ability of rapamycin to limit the progression of established experimental AAAs.

METHODS

AAAs were created in 10-12-week-old male C57BL/6J mice via the porcine pancreatic elastase (PPE) infusion method. Beginning 4 days after PPE infusion, mice were treated with rapamycin (5 mg/kg/day) or an equal volume of vehicle for 10 days. AAA progression was monitored by serial ultrasound examination. Aortae were harvested for histological analyses at sacrifice.

RESULTS

Three days after PPE infusion, prior to vehicle or rapamycin treatment, aneurysms were enlarging at an equal rate between groups. In the rapamycin group, treatment reduced aortic enlargement by 38%, and 53% at 3 and 10 days, respectively. On histological analysis, medial elastin and smooth muscle cell populations were relatively preserved in the rapamycin group. Rapamycin treatment also reduced mural macrophage density and neoangiogenesis.

CONCLUSION

Rapamycin limits the progression of established experimental aneurysms, increasing the translational potential of mechanistic target of rapamycin-related AAA inhibition strategies.

Key role of PI3Kγ in monocyte chemotactic protein-1-mediated amplification of PDGF-induced aortic smooth muscle cell migration

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Vascular smooth muscle cell (SMC) migration within the arterial wall is a crucial event in atherogenesis and restenosis. Monocyte chemotactic protein-1/CC-chemokine receptor 2 (MCP-1/CCR2) signalling is involved in SMC migration processes but the molecular mechanisms have not been well characterized. We investigated the role of PI3Kγ in SMC migration induced by MCP-1.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACHES

A pharmacological PI3Kγ inhibitor, adenovirus encoding inactive forms of PI3Kγ and genetic deletion of PI3Kγ were used to investigate PI3Kγ functions in the MCP-1 and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) signalling pathway and migration process in primary aortic SMC.

KEY RESULTS

The γ isoform of PI3K was shown to be the major signalling molecule mediating PKB phosphorylation in MCP-1-stimulated SMC. Using a PI3Kγ inhibitor and an adenovirus encoding a dominant negative form of PI3Kγ, we demonstrated that PI3Kγ is essential for SMC migration triggered by MCP-1. PDGF receptor stimulation induced MCP-1 mRNA and protein accumulation in SMCs. Blockade of the MCP-1/CCR2 pathway or pharmacological inhibition of PI3Kγ reduced PDGF-stimulated aortic SMC migration by 50%. Thus PDGF promotes an autocrine loop involving MCP-1/CCR2 signalling which is required for PDGF-mediated SMC migration. Furthermore, SMCs isolated from PI3Kγ-deficient mice (PI3Kγ(-/-)), or mice expressing an inactive PI3Kγ (PI3Kγ(KD/KD)), migrated less than control cells in response to MCP-1 and PDGF.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

PI3Kγ is essential for MCP-1-stimulated aortic SMC migration and amplifies cell migration induced by PDGF by an autocrine/paracrine loop involving MCP-1 secretion and CCR2 activation. PI3Kγ is a promising target for the treatment of aortic fibroproliferative pathologies.

Future potential biomarkers for postinterventional restenosis and accelerated atherosclerosis

New circulating and local arterial biomarkers may help the clinician with risk stratification or diagnostic assessment of patients and selecting the proper therapy for a patient. In addition, they may be used for follow-up and testing efficacy of therapy, which is not possible with current biomarkers. Processes leading to postinterventional restenosis and accelerated atherosclerosis are complex due to the many biological variables mediating the specific inflammatory and immunogenic responses involved. Adequate assessment of these processes requires different and more specific biomarkers. Postinterventional remodeling is associated with cell stress and tissue damage causing apoptosis, release of damage-associated molecular patterns and upregulation of specific cytokines/chemokines that could serve as suitable clinical biomarkers. Furthermore, plasma titers of pathophysiological process-related (auto)antibodies could aid in the identification of restenosis risk or lesion severity. This review provides an overview of a number of potential biomarkers selected on the basis of their role in the remodeling process.

Synthetic peptide fragment (65-76) of monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1) inhibits MCP-1 binding to heparin and possesses anti-inflammatory activity in stable angina patients after coronary stenting

OBJECTIVE AND DESIGN

The peptide from C-terminal domain of MCP-1 (Ingramon) has been shown to inhibit monocyte migration and possess anti-inflammatory activity in animal models of inflammation and post-angioplasty restenosis. Here, we investigate the effect of Ingramon treatment on blood levels of acute-phase reactants and chemokines in patients after coronary stenting and the mechanisms of Ingramon anti-inflammatory activity.

SUBJECTS

Eighty-seven patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD) who faced the necessity of coronary angiography (CA) were enrolled. In 67 patients, one-stage coronary stenting was performed; 33 of them were treated with Ingramon in addition to standard therapy. Twenty patients underwent CA only.

METHODS

High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) and fibrinogen blood levels were detected routinely. The chemokine concentration in plasma was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) or cytometric bead array-based immunoassay. Intracellular Ca(2+) levels and cell surface integrin exposure were assayed by flow cytometry. MCP-1 dimerization was studied by sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). MCP-1-heparin binding was assessed with a biosensor and ELISA.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Ingramon treatment was accompanied by less pronounced elevation of hsCRP and fibrinogen levels and decreased MCP-1 concentration in plasma in patients after coronary stenting. Ingramon had no effect on MCP-1 interaction with cell receptors or MCP-1 dimerization, but inhibited MCP-1 binding to heparin. The anti-inflammatory activity of the peptide may be mediated by an impaired chemokine interaction with glycosaminoglycans.

Safety and efficacy of antihypertensive therapy with add-on angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker after successful coronary stent implantation

This study was performed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of additional antihypertensive therapy with angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker (ARB; olmesartan or valsartan) after successful stent implantation in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Fifty patients with CAD after successful stent implantation were included in this study. They were divided into an ARB group, which initially received olmesartan (n=20, 14+/-8 mg day(-1)) or valsartan (n=20, 60+/-23 mg day(-1)) immediately after stent implantation, and a non-ARB group (n=10) according to their blood pressure (BP). Follow-up coronary angiography, measurement of BP and blood sampling were performed before (at baseline) and 6-8 months after stent implantation (at follow-up). There were no significant differences in the baseline characteristics between the groups, except for BP. Although there were no changes in % diameter restenosis between the groups, the BP level in the ARB group at follow-up showed a significant reduction (125+/-12/69+/-9 mm Hg) and reached the target BP. There were no critical adverse effects in the ARB group throughout the study period. In addition, serum high-sensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and pentraxin 3 were significantly decreased in the ARB group but not in the non-ARB group. Although olmesartan and valsartan induced similar BP-lowering effects, olmesartan but not valsartan induced a significant decrease in hs-CRP, but did not increase serum uric acid. In conclusion, antihypertensive therapy with add-on low-dose ARB after stent implantation was safe and achieved the target BP. In particular, olmesartan had an anti-inflammatory effect.