Autoimmune pancreatitis without a response to steroid therapy: a case which met criteria after withdrawal of steroid

Diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is a distinct form of chronic pancreatitis that is increasingly being reported. The presentation and clinical image findings of AIP sometimes resemble those of several pancreatic malignancies, but the therapeutic strategy differs appreciably. Therefore, accurate diagnosis is necessary for cases of AIP. To date, AIP is classified into two distinct subtypes from the viewpoints of etiology, serum markers, histology, other organ involvements, and frequency of relapse: type 1 is related to IgG4 (lymphoplasmacytic sclerosing pancreatitis) and type 2 is related to a granulocytic epithelial lesion (idiopathic duct-centric chronic pancreatitis). Both types of AIP are characterized by focal or diffuse pancreatic enlargement accompanied with a narrowing of the main pancreatic duct, and both show dramatic responses to corticosteroid. Unlike type 2, type 1 is characteristically associated with increasing levels of serum IgG4 and positive serum autoantibodies, abundant infiltration of IgG4-positive plasmacytes, frequent extrapancreatic lesions, and relapse. These findings have led several countries to propose diagnostic criteria for AIP, which consist of essentially similar diagnostic items; however, several differences exist for each country, mainly due to differences in the definition of AIP and the modalities used to diagnose this disease. An attempt to unite the diagnostic criteria worldwide was made with the publication in 2011 of the international consensus diagnostic criteria for AIP, established at the 2010 Congress of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP).

Determination of steroid response by abdominal ultrasound in cases with autoimmune pancreatitis

BACKGROUND

Abdominal ultrasound is the most convenient modality for examining the morphology of the pancreas without physical stress. Steroid response is one of the key features of autoimmune pancreatitis; however, visualizing this response has not been evaluated using ultrasonography.

METHODS

Thirty-three consecutive autoimmune pancreatitis cases were retrospectively investigated for pancreatic and extrapancreatic lesions by ultrasonography before steroid therapy (n=33) and at two weeks (n=28) and one month (n=19) after starting oral steroid treatment.

RESULTS

Steroid treatment resulted in obvious shrinkage of the pancreatic lesion in 86% of the cases at two weeks and in 97% until one month. The maximum thickness of the pancreatic lesion was reduced from 28 to 22 mm in two weeks (P<0.0001), and pancreatic echographic findings improved in one month. Swelling of the peripancreatic lymph node was recognized in 48% and the aortic wall thickness in 12%, mostly reduced in two weeks (P=0.005). One case of definitive autoimmune pancreatitis revealed a steroid response only by following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography but not by ultrasonography or computed tomography.

CONCLUSIONS

Abdominal ultrasound revealed a steroid response in most cases of autoimmune pancreatitis within two weeks. Ultrasonography is suitable for initial confirmation of a steroid response; however, atypical cases showing insufficient response or not fulfilling criteria should undergo further examination.

Characteristics of autoimmune pancreatitis based on serum IgG4 level

BACKGROUND

Autoimmune pancreatitis is categorized as an IgG4-related autoimmune disease, mostly associated with serological alterations, however characteristics of autoimmune pancreatitis based on serum markers have not been fully evaluated.

METHODS

We evaluated demographics, symptoms, imaging and therapeutic outcome in 27 cases of autoimmune pancreatitis stratified by serum IgG4 level.

RESULTS

Twenty patients (74%) had elevated serum IgG4 and 7 (26%) had normal IgG4 levels. Compared to patients with normal serum IgG4 levels, patients with elevated IgG4 had higher incidence of jaundice at onset (14.3% vs. 80%, respectively; P=0.002), more frequent diffuse pancreatic enlargement at imaging (14.3% vs. 60%, respectively; P=0.04), significantly higher 18F-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose uptake of pancreatic lesions (SUV max: 4.0 vs. 5.7, respectively; P=0.02), more frequent extrapancreatic lesions (42.9% vs. 85%, respectively; P=0.03). Response to steroids was recognized regardless of serum IgG4 level, however maintenance therapy was required more frequently amongst patients with elevated compared to normal IgG4 (85.7% vs. 33.3%, respectively; P=0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical features of autoimmune pancreatitis are different based on level of serum IgG4. Further studies are needed to clarify if normal serum IgG4 cases are a precursor of active type 1 or type 2 autoimmune pancreatitis.