Giant cell arteritis: clinical features of patients visiting a headache clinic in Japan

Evaluation of the extracranial "multifocal arcuate sign," a novel MRI finding for the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis, on STIR and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images

BACKGROUND

While early diagnosis of giant cell arteritis (GCA) based on clinical criteria and contrast-enhanced MRI findings can lead to early treatment and prevention of blindness and cerebrovascular accidents, previously reported diagnostic methods which utilize contrast-enhanced whole head images are cumbersome. Diagnostic delay is common as patients may not be aware of initial symptoms and their significance. To improve current diagnostic capabilities, new MRI-based diagnostic criteria need to be established. This study aimed to evaluate the "multifocal arcuate sign" on short tau inversion recovery (STIR) and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (CE-T1W) images as a novel extracranial finding for the diagnosis of GCA.

METHODS

A total of 17 consecutive patients (including five with GCA) who underwent CE-T1W and whole-brain axial STIR imaging simultaneously between June 2010 and April 2020 were enrolled. We retrospectively reviewed their MR images. The "multifocal arcuate sign" was defined as "multiple distant arcuate areas with high signal intensity in extracranial soft tissues such as subcutaneous fat, muscles, and tendons." Extracranial abnormal high-signal-intensity areas were classified as "None," when no lesions were detected; "Monofocal," when lesions were detected only in one place; and "Multifocal," when lesions were detected in multiple places. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of "Multifocal" areas were calculated using cross tabulation. Fisher's exact test was used to compare "Multifocal" areas in five patients with GCA and those with other diseases. In addition, mean Cohen's kappa and Fleiss' kappa statistics were used to compare inter-reader agreement.

RESULTS

The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of the "multifocal arcuate sign" in patients with GCA were 60%, 92-100%, 75-100%, and 85-86%, respectively. Significantly more patients with GCA had "Multifocal" areas compared to those with other diseases (Fisher's exact test, p = 0.008-0.027). Mean Cohen's kappa and Fleiss' kappa for inter-reader agreement with respect to the five GCA patients were 0.52 and 0.49, respectively, for both STIR and CE-T1W sequences.

CONCLUSIONS

The new radiologic finding of "multifocal arcuate sign" on STIR and CE-T1W images may be used as a radiologic criterion for the diagnosis of GCA, which can make plain MRI a promising diagnostic modality.

Cranial involvement in giant cell arteritis

Since its first clinical description in 1890, extensive research has advanced our understanding of giant cell arteritis, leading to improvements in both diagnosis and management for affected patients. Imaging studies have shown that the disease frequently extends beyond the typical cranial arteries, also affecting large vessels such as the aorta and its proximal branches. Meanwhile, advances in comprehending the underlying pathophysiology of giant cell arteritis have given rise to numerous potential therapeutic agents, which aim to minimise the need for glucocorticoid treatment and prevent flares. Classification criteria for giant cell arteritis, as well as recommendations for management, imaging, and treat-to-target have been developed or updated in the last 5 years, and current research encompasses a broad spectrum covering basic, translational, and clinical research. In this Series paper, we aim to discuss the current understanding of giant cell arteritis with cranial manifestations, describe the clinical approach to this condition, and explore future directions in research and patient care.

Headache-Related Characteristics of Biopsy-Confirmed Giant Cell Arteritis and the Relationship of Transmural Inflammation With Artery Tenderness and Chordal Thickening

INTRODUCTION

Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is characterized by headaches, but few studies have examined the detailed characteristics of pathologically confirmed cases. We investigated the characteristics of GCA patients, particularly headache, and their correlation with pathological findings.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 26 patients (median age: 77.5 years, male: 38.4%) with GCA who underwent superficial temporal artery (STA) biopsy at the Japanese Red Cross Shizuoka Hospital between May 2001 and February 2022. All patients fulfilled the American College of Rheumatology and European League Against Rheumatism classification criteria for GCA. We focused on the relationship between clinical features, especially headache, and pathological findings.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients had unilateral, nonpulsatile, intermittent headaches. Transmural inflammation (TMI), a characteristic pathology of GCA, was present in 14 patients. Bivariate analysis revealed significant associations between the TMI and STA-related tenderness (odds ratio [OR]=11, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.14 to 106.43, p=0.046) and the TMI and STA-related chordal thickening (OR=0.19, 95% CI=0.068 to 0.52, p=0.021).

CONCLUSIONS

Headache in GCA patients was often unilateral, nonpulsatile, and intermittent. This study highlights the significant association of TMI with STA tenderness and ligamentous thickening, which has not been reported previously. Abnormal STA findings were significantly associated with pathological changes in GCA patients, emphasizing the importance of these lesions in predicting GCA.

Fatigue: It Is Not Always in the Head

Fatigue is a common presenting complaint in patients seen in clinics and same-day emergency care. Although it has a simple presentation, it can be challenging to diagnose and manage, particularly when an underlying medical condition presents atypically as fatigue. Here we present an interesting case of giant cell arteritis (GCA) with only fatigue as the presenting complaint. GCA is the inflammation of medium and large vessels in the body, including the aortic arch and its branches. It typically manifests above the age of 50 with headaches, jaw claudication, temporal tenderness, arthralgia, night sweats, and unintentional weight loss. Early diagnosis and treatment are of paramount importance to prevent complications, particularly permanent blindness.

Giant Cell Arteritis: A Case-Based Narrative Review of the Literature

Purpose of Review

Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is a chronic, inflammatory condition, primarily affecting the medium and larger arteries. The purpose of this narrative review is to describe GCA in the context of headache and facial pain, based on a case and the available current literature. Understanding the etiology, pathophysiology, the associated conditions, and the differential diagnoses is important in managing GCA.

Recent Findings

In a patient presenting with unilateral facial/head pain with disturbances of vision, GCA should be considered in the differential diagnosis. There is an association of GCA with several comorbid conditions, and infections including coronavirus-19 (COVID-19) infection. Management of GCA primarily depends upon the identification of the affected artery and prompt treatment. Permanent visual loss and other serious complications are associated with GCA.

Summary

GCA is characterized by robust inflammation of large- and medium-sized arteries and marked elevation of systemic mediators of inflammation. An interdisciplinary approach of management involving the pertinent specialties is strongly recommended.

Inflammatory muscle involvement in systemic vasculitis: A systematic review

Vasculitis are severe systemic autoimmune diseases which may involve different organs and systems. Conversely, muscles do not represent an organ commonly involved by systemic vasculitis and myositis is not include among any classification or diagnostic criterion of vasculitis. In this regard, we aimed to review the literature in order to report all the available evidence concerning the inflammatory involvement of muscle in patients affected by systemic vasculitis. We collected a total of 108 papers, for a sum of 395 patients affected by muscle vasculitis. Most of them suffered from medium and small vessels vasculitis (mainly polyarteritis nodosa and ANCA-associated vasculitis) or from vasculitis secondary to rheumatoid arthritis. Conversely, muscle involvement in case of large vessel vasculitis occurred seldom, while only few papers reported such occurrence in Kawasaki or Behçet's disease. Histological findings may differ, but the most common ones displayed a necrotizing vasculitis of perimysium vessels, while granulomatous vasculitis was assessed only in case of ANCA-associated vasculitis patients. Creatine kinase were usually within normal range, seldom elevated, while imaging findings were generally undistinguishable from the ones found in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: magnetic resonance imaging displays signal hyperintensity in T2 and STIR scans, while few data exist for positron emission tomography. The presentation of the disease may be fearsome and severe, sometimes life-threatening, but an overall good response to conventional immunosuppressants and/or glucocorticoids has been reported.

Headache for ophthalmologists: current advances in headache understanding and management

Patients with headache and head pain are often referred to ophthalmologists. These symptoms can either be associated with underlying ophthalmic conditions, or more often are headache disorders unrelated to the eyes. Understanding the phenotype of the headache is critical for advice, safe discharge or onward referral. This review will provide an update on the criteria for common headache disorders that are often seen by ophthalmology and embrace disorders associated with ophthalmic diseases. It will also describe the changing management of migraine and outline recent therapies that are currently available.

The Most Common Causes of Eye Pain at 2 Tertiary Ophthalmology and Neurology Clinics

BACKGROUND

Eye pain is a common complaint, but no previous studies have determined the most common causes of this presenting symptom. Our objective was to determine the most common causes of eye pain in 2 ophthalmology and neurology departments at academic medical centers.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cross-sectional analysis and chart review at the departments of ophthalmology and neurology at the University Hospital Zurich (USZ), University of Zürich, Switzerland, and the University of Utah (UU), USA. Data were analyzed from January 2012 to December 2013. We included patients aged 18 years or older presenting with eye pain as a major complaint.

RESULTS

Two thousand six hundred three patient charts met inclusion criteria; 742 were included from USZ and 1,861 were included from UU. Of these, 2,407 had been seen in an ophthalmology clinic and 196 had been seen in a neurology clinic. Inflammatory eye disease (conjunctivitis, blepharitis, keratitis, uveitis, dry eye, chalazion, and scleritis) was the underlying cause of eye pain in 1,801 (69.1%) of all patients analyzed. Although only 71 (3%) of 2,407 patients had migraine diagnosed in an ophthalmology clinic as the cause of eye pain, migraine was the predominant cause of eye pain in the neurology clinics (100/196; 51%). Other causes of eye pain in the neurology clinics included optic neuritis (44 patients), trigeminal neuralgia, and other cranial nerve disorders (8 patients).

CONCLUSIONS

Eye pain may be associated with a number of different causes, some benign and others sight- or life-threatening. Because patients with eye pain may present to either a neurology or an ophthalmology clinic and because the causes of eye pain may be primarily ophthalmic or neurologic, the diagnosis and management of these patients often requires collaboration and consultation between the 2 specialties.

European Headache Federation recommendations for neurologists managing giant cell arteritis

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Giant cell arteritis (GCA) remains a medical emergency because of the risk of sudden irreversible sight loss and rarely stroke along with other complications. Because headache is one of the cardinal symptoms of cranial GCA, neurologists need to be up to date with the advances in investigation and management of this condition. The aim of this document by the European Headache Federation (EHF) is to provide an evidence-based and expert-based recommendations on GCA.

METHODS

The working group identified relevant questions, performed systematic literature review and assessed the quality of available evidence, and wrote recommendations. Where there was not a high level of evidence, the multidisciplinary (neurology, ophthalmology and rheumatology) group recommended best practice based on their clinical experience.

RESULTS

Across Europe, fast track pathways and the utility of advanced imaging techniques are helping to reduce diagnostic delay and uncertainty, with improved clinical outcomes for patients. GCA is treated with high dose glucocorticoids (GC) as a first line agent however long-term GC toxicity is one of the key concerns for clinicians and patients. The first phase 2 and phase 3 randomised controlled trials of Tocilizumab, an IL-6 receptor antagonist, have been published. It is now been approved as the first ever licensed drug to be used in GCA.

CONCLUSION

The present article will outline recent advances made in the diagnosis and management of GCA.

Diagnostic Performance of a Temporal Artery Biopsy for the Diagnosis of Giant Cell Arteritis in Japan-A Single-center Retrospective Cohort Study

Objectives To investigate the sensitivity and specificity of a temporal artery biopsy (TAB) in the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis (GCA) in a single-center retrospective cohort in Japan. Methods A retrospective chart review was performed on consecutive patients who visited our hospital between April 2009 and October 2018 and underwent a TAB. The sensitivity and specificity were calculated for the three pathological standards for a TAB, predetermined according to the pathological criterion of the 1990 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria: A) vasculitis characterized by predominant mononuclear cell infiltration; B) vasculitis with granulomatous inflammation; and C) vasculitis with multinucleated giant cells. We also analyzed the clinical parameters predicting the diagnosis of GCA and the impact of a diagnostic delay of ≥3 months on cardiovascular complications of GCA. Results Our study population was 16 cases in the GCA group and 13 in the non-GCA group. The sensitivity and specificity for Standard A of a TAB were 81% and 85%, respectively, while those for stricter Standards B or C were identical, at 75% and 100%, respectively. These pathological standards, but not any other parameters, significantly predicted the diagnosis. A diagnostic delay tended to cause cardiovascular complications (p=0.057). Conclusion The sensitivity and specificity of the pathological standards of a TAB were favorable in our cohort and were the only predictors for the diagnosis of GCA. Considering the possible impact of a diagnostic delay on cardiovascular complications, the early recognition and prompt initiation of glucocorticoid therapy is needed, even in Japan, where GCA is uncommon.

Diagnosis and management of giant cell arteritis: an Asia-Pacific perspective

Giant cell arteritis is the commonest primary vasculitis of the elderly. However, the prevalence does vary widely between populations with highest incidence amongst Northern Europeans and lowest amongst East Asians. Preliminary studies suggest that clinical manifestations may differ between different populations. Newer diagnostic approaches including ultrasound, MR angiography and PET imaging are under review. While there have been recent advances in the diagnosis of GCA particularly with regard to imaging, there is an urgent need for improvements in methods of diagnosis, treatment and requirement for screening. Glucocorticoid treatment remain the backbone of therapy. However, glucocorticoid therapy is associated with significant adverse effects. Conventional and novel immunosuppressive agents have only demonstrated modest effects in a subgroup of steroid refractory GCA due to the different arms of the immune system at play. However, recently a study of IL-6 blockade demonstrated benefit in GCA. Newer approaches such as fast-track pathways can also result in improvements in consequences of GCA including blindness.

Projected Worldwide Disease Burden from Giant Cell Arteritis by 2050

Objective.

To estimate and project the number of people affected worldwide by giant cell arteritis (GCA) by 2050. Modeling the number of people visually impaired as a result of this disease will help establish the projected morbidity and resource burden.

Methods.

A systematic literature review up to December 2013 was conducted using PubMed and ISI Web of Science. Studies reporting an incidence rate for GCA were used to model disease incident cases at regional and national levels. United Nations Population Prospect data were used for population projections. Morbidity burden was established through rates of visual impairment. The associated financial implications were calculated for the United States.

Results.

The number of incident cases of GCA will increase secondary to an aging population. By 2050, more than 3 million people will have been diagnosed with GCA in Europe, North America, and Oceania. About 500,000 people will be visually impaired. By 2050, in the United States alone, the estimated cost from visual impairment due to GCA will exceed US$76 billion. Inpatient care for patients with active GCA will total about US$1 billion. Management of steroid-related adverse events will increase costs further, with steroid-induced fractures estimated to total US$6 billion by 2050.

Conclusion.

Projecting disease burden for GCA on a global scale allows for optimization of healthcare planning and prioritization of research domains. Additional population-based studies are required to more accurately project worldwide disease burden. Our work highlights the future global disease burden of GCA, and illustrates the associated financial implications.

Polymyalgia rheumatica: 125 years of epidemiological progress?

OBJECTIVES

On the 125th anniversary of the first recognised publication on polymyalgia rheumatica, a review of the literature was undertaken to assess what progress has been made from the point of view of the epidemiology of this disease and whether such studies have advanced our knowledge of its aetiopathogenesis and management.

METHODS

The authors searched Medline and PubMed using the search terms 'polymyalgia rheumatica', 'giant cell arteritis' and 'temporal arteritis'. As much as possible, efforts were made to focus on studies where polymyalgia and giant cell arteritis were treated as separate entities. The selection of articles was influenced by the authors' bias that polymyalgia rheumatica is a separate clinical condition from giant cell arteritis and that, as yet, the diagnosis is a clinical one.

RESULTS

This review has shown that, following the recognition of polymyalgia as a distinct clinical problem of the elderly, the results of a considerable amount of research efforts investigating the populations susceptible, the geographic distribution of these affected populations and the associated sociological and genetic elements that might contribute to its occurrence, polymyalgia rheumatica remains a difficult problem for the public health services of the developed world.

CONCLUSIONS

Polymyalgia rheumatica remains a clinical enigma and its relationship to giant cell arteritis is no clearer now than it has been for the past 125 years. Diagnosing this disease is still almost exclusively dependent on the clinical acumen of a patient's medical attendant. Until an objective method of identifying it clearly in the clinical setting is available, uncovering the aetiology is still unlikely. Until then, clear guidelines on the future incidence and prevalence of polymyalgia rheumatica and the public health problems of the disease and its management, especially in relation to the use of long term corticosteroids, will be difficult to provide.

Neuro-ophthalmology Annual Review

PURPOSE

To provide a clinical update of the neuro-ophthalmology literature over the last twelve months.

DESIGN

This is an annual review of current literature from August 1, 2011 to August 1, 2012.

METHODS

The authors conducted a one year English language neuro-ophthalmology literature search using PubMed from August 1, 2011 to August 1, 2012 using the following search terms: pupil abnormalities, eye movements, diseases of muscle and musculoskeletal junction, optic nerve disorders, optic neuritis and multiple sclerosis, chiasm and posterior primary visual pathway lesions, increased intracranial pressure and related entities, tumors (e.g., meningioma) and aneurysm affecting the visual pathways, vascular diseases, higher visual functions, advances in neuroimaging, and miscellaneous topics in neuro-ophthalmology. The authors included original articles, review articles, and case reports, which revealed the new aspects and updates in neuro-ophthalmology. Letters to the editor, unpublished work, and abstracts were not included in this annual literature review. We propose to update the practicing clinical ophthalmologist on the most clinically relevant literature from the past year. However, this review is not meant to be all-inclusive and highlights only the literature most applicable to the practicing clinical ophthalmologist.

RESULTS

We reviewed the literature over the past year in neuro-ophthalmology of potential interest and relevance to the comprehensive ophthalmologist.

CONCLUSION

This annual review provides a brief update on a number of neuroophthalmic conditions that might be of interest to the practicing clinical ophthalmologist.