Anti-VEGF Therapy in Myopic CNV

Prognostic factors for intravitreal conbercept in the treatment of choroidal neovascularization secondary to pathological myopia

PURPOSE

To identify risk factors influencing visual outcomes in patients with pathological myopia-associated choroidal neovascularization (PM-CNV) following intravitreal injections of conbercept.

METHODS

A total of 86 eyes from 86 patients received intravitreal conbercept in a 1 + PRN regimen. After the initial injection, patients were followed for 12 months. They were categorized into two groups based on their 12-month visual acuity change: those who achieved greater than a one-line improvement in BCVA (improved group; n = 65) and those who experienced a one-line or lesser improvement or a decrease in BCVA (non-improved group; n = 21).

RESULTS

Over the 12-month period, the mean BCVA in the improved group significantly improved from 0.82 to 0.41 LogMAR. In the non-improved group, BCVA changed from 1.24 to 1.09 LogMAR. Similarly, the mean CRT decreased from 426.21 μm at baseline to 251.56 μm at 12 months in the improved group, and from 452.47 to 382.45 μm in the non-improved group. Multivariable logistic regression analyses revealed that older age (OR 1.287; 95% CI 1.019-1.625; P = 0.034), poorer baseline BCVA (OR 6.422; 95% CI 1.625-25.384; P = 0.008), the presence of subfoveal CNV (OR 4.817; 95% CI 1.242-18.681; P = 0.023), and organized interlacing patterns of CNV morphology (OR 5.593; 95% CI 1.397-22.392; P = 0.015) emerged as independent risk factors correlated with worsened visual prognosis following intravitreal conbercept injections.

CONCLUSIONS

Conbercept demonstrates significant efficacy and safety in treating PM-CNV. Key factors influencing visual recovery post-treatment include older age, poorer baseline BCVA, the presence of subfoveal CNV, and organized interlacing patterns of CNV morphology.

Acute Noninfectious Anterior Ocular Inflammation Following Ranibizumab Biosimilar Intravitreal Injection in a Patient With Recent COVID-19 Vaccination

Even in the post-coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) era, it is prudent to exercise caution regarding the timing between intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections and COVID-19 vaccinations, as ocular inflammation can occur following both procedures. However, this perspective has not been sufficiently discussed thus far. Herein, we report a case of acute noninfectious anterior ocular inflammation following an intravitreal injection of ranibizumab biosimilar (RBZ BS, Senju Pharmaceuticals, Japan) in a patient recently vaccinated against COVID-19. A 74-year-old male with myopic choroidal neovascularization (CNV) in the left eye was treated with RBZ BS intravitreal injection. He received his fourth COVID-19 vaccination with messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA)-1273 (Moderna) two days prior to his second RBZ BS intravitreal injection. He reported no systemic symptoms associated with the fourth COVID-19 vaccination. The second RBZ BS intravitreal injection was safely performed without complications. However, a few hours later, he experienced blurred vision without ocular pain in his left eye, a symptom not observed after the first injection. He visited a local ophthalmologic clinic the following day and was subsequently referred to our hospital due to anterior ocular inflammation in the left eye. His vision in the left eye was 0.3 decimal best-corrected visual acuity. Examination revealed non-granulomatous anterior ocular inflammation with 3+ cells and 2+ flare in the left eye. Anterior vitreous inflammation, keratic precipitates, or conjunctivitis was absent. Fundus examination also showed no signs of posterior inflammation. Both fluorescence angiography and indocyanine green angiography revealed staining corresponding to CNV without retinal vasculature leakage. There is nothing abnormal with the right eye based on the examination. Given that the noninfectious ocular inflammation was likely, based on the acute onset of symptoms within less than 24 hours following the RBZ BS intravitreal injection, and the presence of non-granulomatous inflammation only in the anterior segment without ocular pain, betamethasone eye drops four times daily was initiated in the left eye on the first day following the second RBZ BS intravitreal injection. Then, his ocular inflammation improved to mild by the fourth day post-injection. His eye eventually cleared, with no cells or flare in the anterior chamber at five months. Eventually, given the clinical course of good response to only topical steroid therapy, the diagnosis of noninfectious anterior ocular inflammation following RBZ BS in the case of a recent episode of COVID-19 vaccination was retrospectively confirmed. Although this case represents one of the initial instances of noninfectious ocular inflammation following RBZ BS (Senju Pharmaceuticals) administration, sterile ocular inflammation after other intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy has already been well-reported. In addition, given the recent COVID-19 vaccination, the ocular inflammation might be influenced by the vaccination, synergistically leading to vaccine-associated uveitis with similar signs and symptoms. In conclusion, to prevent such a complex situation, it is advisable to consider an adequate interval between COVID-19 vaccination and intravitreal anti-VEGF injections.

Biology and therapeutic targeting of vascular endothelial growth factor A

The formation of new blood vessels, called angiogenesis, is an essential pathophysiological process in which several families of regulators have been implicated. Among these, vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFA; also known as VEGF) and its two tyrosine kinase receptors, VEGFR1 and VEGFR2, represent a key signalling pathway mediating physiological angiogenesis and are also major therapeutic targets. VEGFA is a member of the gene family that includes VEGFB, VEGFC, VEGFD and placental growth factor (PLGF). Three decades after its initial isolation and cloning, VEGFA is arguably the most extensively investigated signalling system in angiogenesis. Although many mediators of angiogenesis have been identified, including members of the FGF family, angiopoietins, TGFβ and sphingosine 1-phosphate, all current FDA-approved anti-angiogenic drugs target the VEGF pathway. Anti-VEGF agents are widely used in oncology and, in combination with chemotherapy or immunotherapy, are now the standard of care in multiple malignancies. Anti-VEGF drugs have also revolutionized the treatment of neovascular eye disorders such as age-related macular degeneration and ischaemic retinal disorders. In this Review, we emphasize the molecular, structural and cellular basis of VEGFA action as well as recent findings illustrating unexpected interactions with other pathways and provocative reports on the role of VEGFA in regenerative medicine. We also discuss clinical and translational aspects of VEGFA. Given the crucial role that VEGFA plays in regulating angiogenesis in health and disease, this molecule is largely the focus of this Review.

Comparison of antivascular endothelial growth factor treatment for myopia choroidal neovascularisation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy for myopia choroidal neovascularisation (CNV), and to compare the efficacy of two different anti-VEGF retreatment criteria.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from inception to 31 July 2022.

STUDY SELECTION

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing anti-VEGF with sham, photodynamic therapy (PDT) or PDT combination therapy in patients with myopia CNV were reviewed and selected. RCTs comparing visual acuity (VA) stabilisation or disease activity as anti-VEGF retreatment criteria were also included in the study.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Two reviewers independently conducted data extraction and quality assessment. We used a random-effects model for all analyses. Primary outcomes included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central foveal thickness. Secondary outcomes included number of patients who gained more than three lines in BCVA, number of anti-VEGF injections and ocular adverse event (AE).

RESULTS

Seven RCTs involving 1007 patients were included. Compared with sham and PDT therapy, anti-VEGF therapy achieved better BCVA gains of -0.28 logMAR (95% CI -0.36 to -0.20, p<0.00001) and -0.14 logMAR (95% CI -0.17 to -0.10, p<0.00001), respectively. Both ranibizumab and bevacizumab improved patients' vision better than PDT therapy and no definitive increased risk of ocular AE was observed. Analysis of two small RCTs showed that PDT combination therapy had similar visual improvement and needed fewer anti-VEGF injections compared with anti-VEGF monotherapy (weighted mean difference (WMD)=1.30; 95% CI 1.24 to 1.37, p<0.00001). Anti-VEGF retreatment guided by disease activity criteria resulted in comparable visual improvement and reduced anti-VEGF injections compared with retreatment guided by VA stabilisation (WMD=0.83; 95% CI 0.42 to 1.25, p<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Anti-VEGF therapy is effective and well-tolerated for myopia CNV patients. Anti-VEGF retreatment guided by disease activity criteria can achieve comparable efficacy and potentially reduce anti-VEGF injections.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42021292806.

Real-World Treatment Intensity and Patterns in Patients With Myopic Choroidal Neovascularization: Common Data Model in Ophthalmology

BACKGROUND

A paucity of data addressing real-world treatment of myopic choroidal neovascularization (mCNV) in the era of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) drugs led us to investigate real-world treatment intensity and treatment patterns in patients with mCNV.

METHODS

This is a retrospective, observational study using the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership-Common Data Model database of treatment-naïve patients with mCNV over the 18-year study period (2003-2020). Outcomes were treatment intensity (time trends of total/average number of prescriptions, mean number of prescriptions in the first year and the second year after initiating treatment, proportion of patients with no treatment in the second year) and treatment patterns (subsequent patterns of treatment according to the initial treatment).

RESULTS

Our final cohort included 94 patients with at-least 1-year observation period. Overall, 96.8% of patients received anti-VEGF drugs as first-line treatment, with most of injections from bevacizumab. The number of anti-VEGF injections in each calendar year showed an increasing trend over time; however, there was a drop in the mean number of injections in the second year compared to the first year from 2.09 to 0.47. About 77% of patients did not receive any treatment in their second year of treatment regardless of drugs. Most of patients (86.2%) followed non-switching monotherapy only and bevacizumab was the most popular choice either in the first-line (68.1%) or in the second-line (53.8%) of treatment. Aflibercept was increasingly used as the first-line treatment for patients with mCNV.

CONCLUSION

Anti-VEGF drugs have become the treatment of choice and second-line treatment for mCNV over the past decade. Anti-VEGF drugs are effective for the treatment of mCNV as the non-switching monotherapy is the main treatment regimen in most cases and the number of treatments decreases significantly in the second year of treatment.

High‑dose aflibercept injection has striking effects on myopic choroidal neovascularization

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the 1-year outcomes of a high-dose aflibercept injection [4 mg 2+ pro re nata (PRN) scheme] for individuals with myopic choroidal neovascularization (mCNV) through optical coherence tomography (OCT) follow-ups. A total of 16 consecutive patients (7 males and 9 females; sixteen eyes) with mCNV were enrolled in this retrospective study. The mean age was 30.5±3.35 years and mean spherical equivalent was -7.31±0.90 D. Subjects received 4 mg aflibercept intravitreal injection on the day of diagnosis and 35 days later. Further injections of aflibercept were required when the following were detected by OCT and fluorescein angiography: i) Decrease in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA); ii) aggravation of metamorphopsia; iii) macular oedema; iv) macular haemorrhage; v) increase in retinal thickness; and vi) leakage. Ophthalmic examination and OCT were performed at the baseline, as well as at 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 months after the initial aflibercept injection. BCVA and central retinal thickness (CRT) were evaluated at each follow-up. The results showed that the vision of all subjects improved following the aflibercept intravitreal injection. The mean BCVA improved from 0.35±0.15 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (logMAR) at the baseline to 0.12±0.05 logMAR at final follow-up (P<0.05). A reduction in metamorphopsia was observed and the mean CRT was reduced from 345.38±34.69 µm of pre-treatment levels to 222.75±8.98 µm at the last postoperative visit (P<0.05). The mean number of injections in the present study was 2.13±0.5. Out of all patients, 13 received two injections and 3 subjects received three injections. The mean follow-up was 13.41±1.17 months. Based on the outcomes, it was found that an intravitreal injection of high-dose aflibercept (4 mg 2+PRN scheme) is effective for vision improvement and stabilization. In addition, it also significantly alleviated metamorphopsia and reduced the CRT in patients treated with mCNV. During the follow-up, the eyesight of the patients was stable.

Licochalcone A alleviates laser-induced choroidal neovascularization by inhibiting the endothelial-mesenchymal transition via PI3K/AKT signaling pathway

Choroidal neovascularization (CNV) is a hallmark of wet age-related macular degeneration, which severely impairs central vision. Studies have shown that endothelial-mesenchymal transition (EndMT) is involved in the pathogenesis of CNV. Licochalcone A (lico A), a flavonoid extracted from the root of licorice, shows the inhibition on EndMT, but it remains unclear whether it can suppress the formation of CNV. The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of lico A on laser-induced CNV, and EndMT process in vitro and vivo. We established the model of CNV with a krypton laser in Brown-Norway rats and then intraperitoneally injected lico A. Our experimental results demonstrated that the leakage of CNV was relieved, and the area of CNV was reduced in lico A-treated rats. Cell migration and tube formation in oxidized low-density lipoprotein (Ox-LDL)-stimulated HUVECs were inhibited by lico A and promoted by PI3K activator 740Y-P. The protein expressions of snai1 and α-SMA were increased, and CD31 and VE-cadherin were decreased in the model rats of CNV, but partially reversed after treatment with lico A. The expression of CD31 was decreased and α-SMA was increased in OX-LDL-treated HUVECs, which was further strengthened by 740Y-P, while the expression of CD31 was up-regulated and α-SMA was down-regulated in lico A treated HUVECs. Our data revealed that EndMT process was alleviated by lico A. Meanwhile, PI3K/AKT signaling pathway was activated in model rat of CNV and Ox-LDL-stimulated HUVECs, which can be suppressed with treatment of lico A. Our experimental results confirmed for the first time that lico A has the potential to alleviate CNV by inhibiting the endothelial-mesenchymal transition via PI3K/AKT signaling pathway.

Metabolomics study of treatment response to conbercept of patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration and polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy

Background: Neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) and polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) are major causes of blindness in aged people. 30% of the patients show unsatisfactory response to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) drugs. This study aims to investigate the relationship between serum metabolome and treatment response to anti-VEGF therapy.

Methods: A prospective longitudinal study was conducted between March 2017 and April 2019 in 13 clinical sites in China. The discovery group were enrolled from Shanghai General Hospital. The validation group consisted of patients from the other 12 sites. Participants received at least one intravitreal injection of 0.5 mg anti-VEGF drug, conbercept, and were divided into two groups - responders and non-responders. Serum samples of both groups were processed for UHPLC-MS/MS analysis. We constructed principal component analysis (PCA) and partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) models to investigate the metabolic differences between two groups using SIMCA-P. Area under curve (AUC) was calculated to screen the biomarkers to predict treatment response. Metabolites sub-classes and enriched pathways were obtained using MetaboAnalyst5.0.

Results: 219 eyes from 219 patients (nAMD = 126; PCV = 93) were enrolled. A total of 248 metabolites were detected. PCA and PLS-DA models of the discovery group demonstrated that the metabolic profiles of responders and non-responders clearly differed. Eighty-five differential metabolites were identified, including sub-classes of diacylglycerophosphocholines, lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC), fatty acids, phosphocholine, etc. Responders and non-responders differed most significantly in metabolism of LPC (p = 7.16 × 10^-19) and diacylglycerophosphocholine (p = 6.96 × 10^-17). LPC 18:0 exhibited the highest AUC, which is 0.896 with 95% confidence internal between 0.833 and 0.949, to discriminate responders. The predictive accuracy of LPC 18:0 was 72.4% in the validation group.

Conclusions: This study suggests that differential metabolites may be useful for guiding treatment options for nAMD and PCV. Metabolism of LPC and diacylglycerophosphocholine were found to affect response to conbercept treatment. LPC 18:0 was a potential biomarker to discriminate responders from non-responders.

[Avoiding mistakes in anti-VEGF intravitreal injection therapy]

Intravitreal injection (IVI) of drugs for treatment of various macular diseases is now one of the most frequently performed surgical procedures worldwide. As mostly chronic diseases are treated, the indications for treatment often mean a continuous treatment over years with a corresponding effort regarding spatial, personnel and financial resources. The diagnosis and indications for treatment are nowadays mainly made by spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). The ability to clinically assess and evaluate a fluorescence angiography is less practiced, although these are still a component of the indications for intravitreal injections. Therefore, it can happen that despite all diligence patients may receive anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment, sometimes permanently, based on a misinterpretation of the macular diagnosis or disease activity and these indications, once made, are rarely questioned or retracted. Therefore, the aim of this manuscript is to point out possible and typical misinterpretations in the indications or continuation of IVI treatment with anti-VEGF by means of case studies and to sensitize for differential diagnoses.