Fixed-Ratio Combinations of Basal Insulin and GLP-1RA in the Management of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Highlights from the Literature

Early Conversion of Intensive Insulin Therapy to IDegLira Demonstrates Higher Efficacy and Safety in Reducing Fasting Blood Glucose and HbA1c in T2DM Patients

Background

A short-term insulin intensive therapy is an important method used in clinical practice to control blood glucose, and a scientific post-treatment plan is key to long-term blood glucose stability control. This study aimed to investigate efficacy and safety of early conversion of intensive insulin therapy to IDegLira in T2DM patients.

Methods

This study was a prospective study, involving 80 T2DM patients finally. Patients were firstly treated with insulin for intensified therapy (Pre-IDegLira group), then switched to insulin degludec and liraglutide (IDegLira) for 3 months (IDegLira-3 months group). Data including HbA1c, fasting blood glucose, fasting C-peptide, weight, insulin dosage, total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) were analyzed. Correlations between fasting blood glucose and other parameters were evaluated with Pearson correlation analysis.

Results

IDegLira early conversion significantly reduced fasting blood glucose (p<0.001), weight (p=0.015), and insulin dosage (p=0.001) of T2DM patients compared to those of Pre-IDegLira group. HbA1c level was remarkably lower in T2DM patients underwent IDegLira early conversion compared to that in Pre-IDegLira group (p<0.001), with HbA1c <7% proportion of 73.75% (59/80). IDegLira early conversion significantly downregulated levels of TC (p<0.001), TG (p<0.001), LDL-C (p<0.001), and upregulated HDL-C level (p=0.017) of T2DM patients, compared to those in Pre-IDegLira group. IDegLira early conversion markedly reduced ALT (p<0.001) and AST (p=0.002) levels of T2DM patients compared to those in Pre-IDegLira group. IDegLira early conversion demonstrated a positive correlation between fasting blood glucose and HbA1c (r=0.531, p<0.001) or TG level (r=0.336, p=0.002) in T2DM patients.

Conclusion

Early conversion of intensive insulin therapy to IDegLira effectively reduced fasting blood glucose and HbA1c in T2DM patients with higher safety.

Sarcopenia and Diabetes: A Detrimental Liaison of Advancing Age

Sarcopenia is an age-related clinical complaint characterized by the progressive deterioration of skeletal muscle mass and strength over time. Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is associated with faster and more relevant skeletal muscle impairment. Both conditions influence each other, leading to negative consequences on glycemic control, cardiovascular risk, general health status, risk of falls, frailty, overall quality of life, and mortality. PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were searched for research articles, scientific reports, observational studies, clinical trials, narrative and systematic reviews, and meta-analyses to review the evidence on the pathophysiology of di-abetes-induced sarcopenia, its relevance in terms of glucose control and diabetes-related outcomes, and diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. The review comprehensively addresses key elements for the clinical definition and diagnostic criteria of sarcopenia, the pathophysiological correlation be-tween T2D, sarcopenia, and related outcomes, a critical review of the role of antihyperglycemic treatment on skeletal muscle health, and perspectives on the role of specific treatment targeting myokine signaling pathways involved in glucose control and the regulation of skeletal muscle metabolism and trophism. Prompt diagnosis and adequate management, including lifestyle inter-vention, health diet programs, micronutrient supplementation, physical exercise, and pharmaco-logical treatment, are needed to prevent or delay skeletal muscle deterioration in T2D.

Effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists on glucose excursion and inflammation in overweight or obese type 2 diabetic patients

BACKGROUND

Currently, the lack of comparative studies between weekly and daily formulations of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) for glucose excursion is worth investigation.

AIM

To investigate the effects of weekly and daily formulations of GLP-1RA on glucose excursion and inflammation in overweight and obese patients with type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

Seventy patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were treated at our hospital between January 2019 and January 2022 were enrolled in this retrospective analysis. All patients were treated with metformin. We evaluated changes in blood glucose levels and a series of important indicators in patients before and after treatment with either a weekly or daily preparation of GLP-1RA (group A; n = 33 and group B; n = 37).

RESULTS

The degree of decrease in the levels of fasting blood glucose, mean blood glucose, mean amplitude of glycemic excursions, total cholesterol, triglycerides, tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin-6, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein after treatment in group A was higher than that in group B (P < 0.05), whereas the 2-h postprandial blood glucose levels decreased more so in group B than in group A (P < 0.001). However, there were no statistically significant differences in the levels of glycated hemoglobin, standard deviation of blood glucose, coefficient of variation, absolute mean of daily differences, percentage of time with 3.9 mmol/L < glucose < 10 mmol/L, and high- and low-density lipoproteins between the two groups (P > 0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions was significantly lower in group A than in group B (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The effect of the weekly preparation of GLP-1RA in controlling blood glucose levels in the patients, suppressing inflammation, and reducing adverse reactions was significantly higher than that of the daily preparations, which is worthy of clinical promotion.

Current State and Principles of Basal Insulin Therapy in Type 2 Diabetes

Treatment with basal insulins is a fundamental part of management in many patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Multiple management schemes may be indicated in these individuals, for example, the use of oral antihyperglycemic agents with basal insulins (basal-supported oral therapy) or the combinations of basal insulins with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists; each of these strategies makes it easier to achieve glycemic control goals. A basic knowledge of the physiology, pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic aspects of the different basal insulins is essential to achieve treatment goals and compliance. This review addresses the principles of management with basal insulins.

An update on the safety of insulin-GLP-1 receptor agonist combinations in type 2 diabetes mellitus

INTRODUCTION

Recent development of novel antidiabetic drugs with proven cardiovascular (CV) and renal benefit and positive effect on body weight enable to take a more complex approach toward the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Fixed-ratio combinations of insulin-GLP-1 receptor agonist (FRC) utilize complementary mechanisms of action of their individual components and address multiple pathologies linked with T2DM at the same time.

AREAS COVERED

There are currently three FRCs on the market: iGlarLixi (glargine and lixisenatide in 2 different formulations) and IDegLira (degludec and liraglutide). We provide an up-to-date review on the rationale for the use of FRCs and their current position in the management of T2DM. We discuss the available evidence from randomized controlled trials, post hoc analyses, indirect comparative studies and real-world data on their effect on glycemic control, risk of hypoglycemia, body weight, CV safety, and their safety profile.

EXPERT OPINION

FRCs represent an efficacious option for treatment intensification from basal insulin or even the first insulin-based therapy in T2DM. Their excellent glucose-lowering efficacy is complemented with lower risk of hypoglycemia in comparison to basal insulin, neutral effect on body weight and the lower risk of gastrointestinal adverse effects in comparison to GLP-1 receptor agonists.