Treatment of Zygomatic Complex Fractures with Surgical or Nonsurgical Intervention: A Retrospective Study

Evaluation of Different Patterns of Zygomaticoorbital Complex Fractures

Study Design

Very few studies exist regarding the fracture pattern variability of the zygomaticoorbital (ZMO) complex. The retrospective evaluation of a large series of surgically treated unilateral ZMO fractures would in certain circumstances help intraoperative predictability and define sensitive indicators for open reduction and internal fixation.

Objective

The aim of this study was to investigate the different fracture patterns after ZMO complex injury regarding the 5 anatomic sutures of the zygoma as well as the concomitance of the paranasal buttress and maxillary sinus wall fracture.

Methods

The medical records of all patients with unilateral ZMO fractures who underwent surgical intervention in a single trauma center department between April 2015 and June 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic and anamnesis data, radiologic findings, and surgical reports were evaluated. According to the preoperative radiologic evaluation, ZMO fractures were classified as unisutural, bisutural, trisutural, tetrasutural, and complete based on the number of zygomatic sutures. The prevalence of various fracture patterns was analyzed. The impact of patient's age and trauma etiology on the fracture pattern was evaluated using descriptive statistical analysis.

Results

The study included 492 patients with unilateral ZMO fractures, with a mean age of 49.93 years (SD = 20.66) and a male:female ratio of 2.23:1. The most affected age group was 19-44 years (41.67%) and tripping falls were the most common etiology (27.24%). Trisutural (57.32%) and unisutural fractures (23.17%) were the most common, followed by tetrasutural (8.94%), bisutural (8.54%), and complete fractures (2.03%). A trisutural fracture involving the zygomaticomaxillary suture, the infraorbital rim, and the zygomaticosphenoidal suture was the most common fracture pattern (52.03%). Most fractures were observed in the zygomaticosphenoidal suture (86.99%), followed by the infraorbital rim (74.59%) and the zygomaticomaxillary suture (68.29%). Fractures of the maxillary sinus wall and the paranasal buttress co-existed in 9.55% and 31.30% of all cases, respectively. No correlation was detected between age and fracture pattern (P = .4111). Tripping falls and bicycle accidents significantly influenced the fracture pattern (P < .0001).

Conclusions

According to the results, knowledge of the fracture pattern variability of the ZMO complex could in certain circumstances designate CT or CBCT as mandatory before operating on ZMO fractures. Consequently, unnecessary incisions could be avoided. The high concomitance of paranasal buttress fracture also suggests its intraoperative surgical exploration. Further studies should correlate the clinical findings with indication for surgery and postoperative outcome for the different fracture patterns described.

Intraoperative Computed Tomography in the Surgical Treatment of Zygomatic Complex Fracture: A Retrospective Cohort Study

This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of intraoperative computed tomography (ICT) in managing zygomatic complex (ZMC) fractures surgically. A total of 143 patients (84 men, 59 women; average age 37.13 y) undergoing surgical treatment for ZMC fractures participated in this retrospective cohort study, with 72 in the ICT group and 71 in the control group. There were no notable differences in gender, age, time from injury to surgery, and surgical duration between the two groups. The ICT group exhibited significantly fewer surgical approaches than the control group (1.39±0.519 vs. 2.07±0.617, P<0.001). Fixation points in the ICT group (1-point: 42, 2-point: 14, 3-point: 16) significantly differed from the control group (1-point: 15, 2-point: 17, 3-point: 39), P<0.001. Symmetry of reduction was assessed through immediate postoperative images, and stability was compared between immediate postoperative images and those taken at least 3 months later. Both assessments revealed no significant differences between the 2 groups. This study indicates that ICT facilitates prompt evaluation of ZMC reduction, minimizing the necessity for incisions and internal fixation, while achieving comparable reduction efficacy and long-term stability to conventional approaches.

Outcomes of Non-surgical Management of Zygomaticomaxillary Complex Fractures

Introduction

With little evidence available in the literature, this study tries to clinically determine the efficiency and outcomes of non-surgical management of post-traumatic Zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) fractures.

Materials and Methods

One hundred and three patients with post-traumatic isolated ZMC fractures managed conservatively for various reasons were identified. The patients were classified based on the Zingg et al. criteria into Types A, B, and C. We evaluated the resolution of signs and symptoms of six standard parameters over 6 months-persistent pain, restriction in mouth opening, infraorbital nerve (ION) paresthesia, aesthetic deformity, infraorbital step deformity with associated tenderness on palpation, and ophthalmic status. The study variables were then statistically analyzed using Cochran's Q test with an associated confidence interval of 95%.

Results

A six-month follow-up revealed persisting residual deformities for all three groups. However, Type A and Type B showed significant improvement in pain reduction, mouth opening, and infraorbital nerve (ION) paresthesia. No significant improvement was noted in any of the groups for aesthetic deformity, infraorbital step deformity, and ophthalmic status. Type C, which had comminuted fracture patterns, exhibited significant defects in all the parameters. Significant inter-variable relationship between certain paired parameters was also observed.

Conclusion

The Type A group is most suited for non-surgical management. Type B with a mono-bloc fracture is a crucial group that demands broader, long-term studies to extract a proper treatment protocol. Type C with severe fracture displacement validates surgical correction.

Management of Mid-Facial Fracture Complicated by Pseudoaneurysm of Posterior Superior Alveolar Artery

Facial fractures, particularly mid-facial fractures, can result in various complications, such as functional and esthetic problems. Prompt reconstruction of the fractured bones is crucial for restoring normal anatomy and function and preventing complications. However, such procedures can be complex and carry the risk of potential complications. The authors report the case of a 27-year-old man who underwent open reduction and internal fixation of the left zygomatic complex fracture and reconstruction of the left inferior orbital wall. During the surgery, heavy bleeding from the posterior superior alveolar artery due to a broken bone near the pterygomaxillary region caused a prolonged surgery time and the development of a pseudoaneurysm. The pseudoaneurysm was eventually treated with superselective transcatheter embolization using 25% N-Butyl cyanoacrylate glue. This case highlights the challenges in the management of mid-facial fractures and the potential complications that can arise during surgery, particularly when dealing with the pterygomaxillary region.

C-Arm a Useful Tool for Surgeons in Reduction of Zygomatic Complex Fracture: A Comparative Study: Article Type-Original Research

Introduction

Reduction of zygomaticomaxillary (ZMC) fracture is often difficult to evaluate intraoperatively because of it peculiar anatomy and limited accessibility. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of use of C-arm as a tool for intraoperative monitoring of ZMC fracture reduction.

Materials and Methods

Group I (C-Arm) and Group II (control group) comprised of patients with isolated unilateral displaced Zygomatic complex (ZMC) fractures and having orbital volume change. The efficacy of use of C-arm intra-operatively was evaluated to analyse the reduction of fracture.

Results

It was observed that mean change in ocular volume was around 1.07cm2 for Group I and 1.51cm2 in Group II. Thus post-operative eye volume was near to normal in Group I than Group II. The change in ocular volume post-operatively was observed to be statistically significant (p-value < 0.05) in both the groups. Post HOC Tukey statistical analysis determined the intergroup relation in change in eye volume between normal, pre- and post-operative and was found to be statistically significant (p-value < 0.05). The intergroup comparison between Group I and Group II was done using ANOVA statistical analysis and was found to be statistically significant (p-value < 0.05).

Discussion

Our study revealed that C-arm is definitively an effective tool in the oral and maxillofacial surgery armamentarium, giving better results with minimal surgical exposure and by eliminating operator related error.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12070-022-03221-y.

Evidence-Based Medicine for Midface/Orbit/Upper Facial Fracture Repair

The face is one of the most common areas of traumatic injury, making up approximately 25% of all injuries in 2016. Assault, motor vehicle collision (MVC), fall, sports, occupational, and gunshot wounds (GSW) are all common causes of facial fractures, with MVC and GSW leading to significantly higher severity of injuries. Most facial fractures occur in the upper two-thirds of the face. Most facial fractures require timely assessment, diagnosis, and treatment for optimal restoration of facial structures and functions. Without proper initial management, significant complications including immediate complications such as airway compromise, massive bleeding, infection, intracranial hemorrhages, or even death, and long-term complications such as poor functional outcomes and aesthetic setbacks can occur. The goal of this review is to summarize the management of fractures of the upper face, orbit, and midface and provide an update about complications and their management.

Management of zygomatico maxillary complex fractures

Zygomatic bone fractures should be effectively diagnosed and treated because they affect how the face is shaped for both aesthetically and functional reasons. It is possible to compare different surgical techniques and their comorbidities objectively through using outcome quantitative assessments, which call for a treatment programme and long-term follow-up. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of two procedures and the effectiveness of the zygomatic bone following open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) employing two-point fixation and ORIF employing three-point fixation. Two groups of twenty patients each were randomly assigned to. Twenty patients in Group A had ORIF treatment using two-point miniplate fixation technique, and twenty patients in Group B received three-point miniplate fixation treatment. Differences between the two categories were ascertained after they had been evaluated in terms of their advantages and disadvantages. We discovered that the two-point fixation group had the fewest facial complications and neurological side effects. At 1 month follow up, Group B's average radiological evaluation score was 2.47± 0.30, and then at 6 months follow up, it was found out to be 1.87±0.47. A significant statistical distinction between the average radiological evaluations was observed in study participants of Group A at follow up done after one month and six months of procedure. Student's paired t- statistical test was utilized from this statistical analysis. (t = 6.54, P < 0.01). On carrying out follow up after one month of surgery, average neurological assessment score in study participants of group A was found out to be 0.22± 0.42, and then at 6 months follow up, it was 0.61±0.63. The average neurological evaluation score in study participants of Group A on carrying out follow up after one month of surgical procedure and and after six months of surgical procedure months showed a significant statistical distinction when utilizing Student's paired t- statistical test (t = 2.51, P = 0.021).It was determined that the best available rehabilitation for the treatment of zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures is open reduction and internal fixation employing two-point fixation by miniplates.

Minimally Invasive Single-Point Stabilization of Zygomaticomaxillary Complex Fractures

Objective

This study aimed to present a minimally invasive surgical management of zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) fractures with reduction and single-point stabilization over the frontozygomatic buttress.

Methods

This prospective cohort study was conducted on cases of ZMC fractures. The inclusion criteria were displaced tetrapod zygomatic factures, asymmetry of the facial bones, and unilateral lesion. The exclusion criteria were extensive skin or soft tissue loss, comminuted inferior orbital rim, limited ocular mobility, and enophthalmos. Surgical management included reduction and single-point stabilization over the zygomaticofrontal suture with miniplates and screws. The outcome measure was correction of the clinical deformity with less scarring and low postoperative morbidity. The late outcome was maintenance of a stable fixed reduced zygoma over the follow-up period.

Results

Forty-five patients were included in the study with a mean age of 30 ± 5.56 years. The study included 40 men and 5 women. Motor vehicle accident was the most common cause of fracture (62.2%). They were managed via lateral eyebrow approach with single-point stabilization over the frontozygomatic suture after reduction. Preoperative and postoperative and radiologic images were available. All cases had optimum correction of the clinical deformity. Postoperative stability was excellent in the follow-up period, which had a mean of 18.5 ± 7.81 months.

Conclusion

There is an increased interest in minimally invasive procedures, and concerns about scarring have increased. Therefore, single-point stabilization over the frontozygomatic suture provides good support to the reduced ZMC with low morbidity.

Primary reconstruction of combined orbital and zygomatic complex fractures with patient-specific milled titanium implants - A retrospective study

The aim of this retrospective study was to compare mid-facial symmetry and clinical outcomes between patients treated with patient-specific and standard implants in primary fracture reconstructions of combined orbital and zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures. Patients who underwent primary reconstruction of orbital and zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures during the study period were identified and background and clinical variables and computed tomography images were collected from patient records. Zygomaticomaxillary complex dislocation and orbital volume were measured from pre- and postoperative images and compared between groups. Out of 165 primary orbital reconstructions, eight patients treated with patient-specific and 12 patients treated with standard implants were identified with mean follow-up time of was 110 days and 121 days, respectively. Postoperative orbital volume difference was similar between groups (0.2 ml for patient-specific vs 0.3 ml for standard implants, p = 0.942) despite larger preoperative difference in patient-specific implant group (2.1 ml vs 1,5 ml, p = 0.428), although no statistical differences were obtained in symmetricity or accuracy between the reconstruction groups. Within the limitations of the study it seems that patient-specific implants are a viable option for primary reconstructions of combined zygomaticomaxillary complex and orbital fractures, because with patient-specific implants at least as symmetrical results as with standard implants can be obtained in a single surgery.

Neurosensory Assessment of Infraorbital Nerve Injury Following Unilateral Zygomaticomaxillary Complex Fracture – A Prospective Study

Background:

This study aimed to assess the difference in the recovery pattern of branches of infraorbital nerve paraesthesia after zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) fracture in both surgically and non-surgically managed patients.

Materials & Methods:

A prospective, observational study involving 31 patients with unilateral ZMC fracture - 15 in the surgical group (Group A) and 16 in the non-surgical group (Group B) was evaluated. These patients were assessed at the time of injury, 3-months follow-up, and 6-months follow-up for the sensory function of the infraorbital nerve. The assessment of paraesthesia by cotton wisp test, light touch monofilament test, and the cold thermal test was subjected to intra-group and inter-group correlation by McNemar test and Fischer's exact test. Repeated Measures ANOVA with post-hoc Bonferroni test for intra-group correlation and independent sample t-test for inter-group correlation were used for two-point discrimination.

Results:

A statistically significant improvement was noted on both 3 and 6 months follow-up in the malar region in group A. Other statistically significant improvements were noted only on 6 months follow-up in the infraorbital region in group A. On the 2-point discrimination test, all the facial regions showed significant improvement in both the groups over 3 months and 6 months of follow-up.

Conclusion:

There was a significant improvement in the infraorbital nerve sensory function following ZMC fracture over 6 months; however, the surgical intervention showed no statistical significance. Further, it can also be concluded that the inferior palpebral branch of the infraorbital nerve shows maximum functional disruption resulting in a higher incidence of paraesthesia in the infraorbital and malar region.

Automated 3D Analysis of Zygomaticomaxillary Fracture Rotation and Displacement

Background

The zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) can experience a multitude of deforming forces. There is limited understanding on which deformities alter patient outcomes. This study utilized an automated, three-dimensional analysis to elucidate which fracture patterns and rotational deformities are most prevalent and associated with postoperative complications.

Methods

This study was a 7-year retrospective review of patients with unilateral ZMC fractures who underwent surgical intervention. Patient demographics, injury mechanisms, presenting symptoms, and postoperative outcomes were collected. Segmentation was completed using Mimics software. The lateral-medial, superior-inferior, and anterior-posterior axes were manually identified on the zygoma and then displacement, rotational direction, and rotational degrees were automatically calculated using Geomagic software. Total displacement score was generated by summation of individual displacement scores at each of the five sutures.

Results

Eighty-one patients satisfied inclusion criteria. The most prevalent rotational pattern of the zygoma was medially-superiorly-posteriorly (P < 0.001). When comparing rotation along the three axes, the zygoma had the greatest rotation along the lateral-medial axis compared with the superior-inferior (P = 0.003) and anterior-posterior (P < 0.001) axes. Within each axis, the zygoma was more likely to rotate medially than laterally (P = 0.003) and posteriorly than anteriorly (P = 0.01). Multivariate analysis identified total displacement scores and degrees rotated along the lateral-medial axis as significant predictors of facial complications and reoperation.

Conclusions

This study suggests that patients with unilateral ZMC fractures who undergo surgical intervention are at an increased risk for adverse outcomes with greater rotation along the lateral-medial axis and higher total displacement scores. Additionally, the automated analysis method described can provide objective data to better characterize ZMC fractures.

The Relationship Between Morphometric Measurments, Severity and Success of Zygomatic Arch Fracture Reduction

PURPOSE

Zygomatic arch fractures are commonly treated by closed reduction. This kind of treatment is highly influenced by the treating surgeon and type of fracture. Thus, it is important to choose the optimal treatment for different fractures. Current treatment schemes for zygomatic arch fractures reduction are based on subjective assessments. We believe this approach should be refined. Create a new treatment algorithm for the solitary and combined zygomatic arch fractures based on radiological morphometric measurements. This will assist the clinician in tailoring a suitable treatment for each case and avoiding pitfalls, thus achieving best possible results.

METHODS

A total of 179 radiologic images of patients treated in our department for zygomatic arch fractures were morphometrically measured and analyzed.

RESULTS

Three variables showed a capacity to predict a large remaining defect; The presence of a preoperative esthetic defect and a large initial latero-lateral (LL) defect reduced the probability of a large remaining defect (OR = 0.289, P= .019; (OR = 0.78, P= .008; respectively). Patients with initial LL defect < 3.5 mm presented postoperative residual defect 3-times greater than patients with initial LL defect > 3.5 mm A large antero-posterior telescoping increased the probability of a large remaining defect (OR = 1.27 P= .003). Cases that had antero-posterior telescoping > 1.45 mm had a 72.4% probability of remaining with a poor residual defect > 84.1% (P= .003).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on our results we believe that the use of morphometric measurements is important when assessing zygomatic arch fractures. We found that there are measurements that can be used to predict esthetic and functional defects, as well as probability of resolving them. Morphometric measurements can be used to predict the reduction difficulty and can assist the clinician in choosing the optimal reduction method and thus increasing the success rate.

Application of real-time surgical navigation for zygomatic fracture reduction and fixation

BACKGROUND

Inappropriate treatment of zygomatic fractures can reduce esthetic and functional outcomes. The aim of this study was to answer the research question: "Among patients with a unilateral zygomatic fracture, is the use of computer-assisted real-time navigation system during fracture reduction precise and accurate to create postoperative facial symmetry?"

METHODS

Using a retrospective cohort study design, we enrolled a cohort of unilateral zygomatic fractures undergoing open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with the aid of the computer-based navigation system at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taiwan, during January 2015 and March 2018. The predictor variable was the comparison before and after surgery. The main outcome variables included (1) two-dimensional (2D) reduction of the displacement at five anatomical landmarks: zygomaticofrontal, inferior orbital rim, zygomaticosphenoidal, zygomaticomaxillary, and zygomaticotemporal lines/buttresses and (2) three-dimensional (3D) differences on distances between zygomatic surface to the porion plane and the midpoint of zygomatic arch (ZA) to the mid-porion (MP) plane. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was computed to compare between pre- and postoperative data, and a p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

The cohort comprised 24 subjects (50% females, 75% left-sided) with a mean age of 30.5 +/- 13.8 years. On 2D analysis, the significant fracture reduction was found: 4.78 vs. 1.22 mm, 1.78 vs. 0.40 mm, 3.50 vs. 0.07 mm, 3.06 vs. 0.55 mm, and 2.55 vs. 0.50 mm at zygomaticomaxillary, zygomaticofrontal, inferior orbital rim, zygomaticosphenoidal, and zygomaticotemporal landmarks. The 3D evaluations revealed the significant reduction of the differences between the left and right zygomatic surface to the porion plane (4.09 ± 2.12 vs. 0.46 ± 0.35 mm) and between the left and right ZA midpoints to the MP plane (4.89 ± 2.59 vs. 0.71 ± 0.44 mm) (p<0.001 for both 2D and 3D analyses).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study suggest that the real-time surgical navigation system can effectively guide the ORIF of zygomatic fractures. Future research studies should focus on the learning curve and cost-effectiveness analysis of this technique.

Two-point versus three-point fixation in the management of zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures: A comparative study

Introduction:

The zygoma plays an important role in the facial contour for both cosmetic and functional reasons; therefore, zygomatic bone injuries should be properly diagnosed and adequately treated. Comparison of various surgical approaches and their complications can only be done objectively using outcome measurements that require a protocol for management and long-term follow-up. The objectives of this study were to compare the efficacy of zygomatic bone after treatment with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) using two-point fixation and ORIF using three-point fixation and compare the outcome of two procedures.

Materials and Methods:

Twenty patients were randomly divided equally into two groups. In Group A, ten patients were treated by ORIF using two-point fixation by miniplates and in Group B, ten patients were treated by ORIF using three-point fixation by miniplates. They were evaluated with their advantages and disadvantages and the difference between the two groups was observed.

Results:

We found that postoperative facial and neurological complications are minimum in two-point fixation group. Based on this study, open reduction and internal fixation using two-point fixation by miniplates is sufficient and the best available treatment of choice for the management of zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures.

Discussion:

Alignment of the fracture at three points and fixation at two stable points provide the most accurate and satisfactory postoperative results. Two-point interosseous fixation at the “buttress” fracture and the frontozygomatic (FZ) fracture is suitable for routine surgery. The results of these studies confirm with the present study that two-point fixation provided better stability in patients with clinical and radiological evidence of fracture in FZ and zygomaticomaxillary buttress area.

The Role of Computed Tomography in Zygomatic Bone Fracture - A Case Report

Introduction

The zygomatic complex is integral to the facial contour, protection of the eye and other facial structures, and dental occlusion. Its importance in facial function and aesthetics requires high quality outcomes of the treatment.

Case presentation

This paper reports the case of a 46-year-old man who had an occupational accident resulting in extensive facial trauma and zygomatic fractures. The patient presented with hyposphagma, palpable step in the area of the infraorbital rim, paresthesia of the right infraorbital nerve, flattening of zygomatic prominence, abrasion of the chin and nose, a 7-cm laceration in the midface region, ecchymosis in the palate, and alteration in the dental occlusion without limitation of mouth opening. Computed tomography (CT) confirmed the zygomatic complex fractures. The treatment was reduction and fixation with plates and screws. CT was used throughout the treatment period as an essential diagnostic tool for accurate fracture assessment and classification, formulation of the surgical plan, and postoperative evaluation.

Conclusion

This case study illustrated the correct use of CT for improved and efficient treatment of traumatic injury of the zygoma, an anatomical area where restoration of function and aesthetics is challenging. The patient signed a written informed consent statement for publication.

Risk of Subsequent Migraines in Facial Fracture Patients: A Population-Based Cohort Study

Background: Limited studies have discussed the association between facial fractures and subsequent migraines. In this study, we examined this association and the effect of facial fracture and surgery on the development of migraines. Methods: We selected 5034 patients with facial fractures and a matched cohort of 20,136 patients without facial fractures or facial-associated surgery with a history of migraine from the National Health Insurance database. Risk factors included age, gender, occupation (white-collar, blue-collar, and others), and comorbidities. Patients were frequency matched by age, gender, and index year. The incidence of migraine and the association between migraine development and facial surgery were identified by facial fracture location stratification. Results: The incidence of migraines in the facial fracture cohort was 1.37-fold higher when compared with the comparison cohort (6.47 vs. 4.73 per 1000 person-years). There was a 1.31-fold risk of migraines in the adjusted hazard model and a 1.30-fold risk of migraines in the subdistribution hazard model (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12-1.52 and 1.12-1.51, respectively). Malar/maxillary and nasal fractures showed 1.48- and 1.29-fold risks of migraines in the adjusted hazard model and subdistribution hazard model (95% CI, 1.16-1.89 and 1.05-1.59, respectively). There were no significant differences in migraine occurrence among patients who underwent surgery. Conclusions: Our findings indicated that malar/maxillary and nasal fractures were associated with a subsequent risk of migraines. There were no significant differences in migraine occurrence among patients who underwent surgery. Because of the retrospective nature of this study, further studies are warranted.

An Update on Maxillary Fractures: A Heterogenous Group

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to review the different types of maxillary fractures and highlight their diagnostic and therapeutic differences.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of patients who sustained maxillary fractures was conducted through the Einstein Healthcare Network during the years 2016-2017. Descriptive statistics and chi-square analysis were used to categorize continuous and categorical variables, respectively.

RESULTS

The cohort of patients (n = 141) were predominately African American (62%) and male (75%) with a mean age 45.3 years. The most common maxillary fracture was maxillary sinus (29%), followed by zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) (26%), frontal process (20%), dentoalveolar (16%), and LeFort (9%). Dentoalveolar fractures were mostly evaluated by the oral maxillofacial surgery service (74%), while ZMC and LeFort fractures were more commonly referred to an otolaryngologist (56% and 67%, respectively). Patients with dentoalveolar fractures were more likely to undergo wire splinting (61%). All patients with frontal process and maxillary sinus fractures were managed non-operatively. Most patients with ZMC fractures were managed non-operatively (78%) while the remainder underwent open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) (22%). Patients with LeFort fractures more commonly underwent maxillomandibular fixation (MMF)/ORIF (83%). Dentoalveolar fractures were the most likely to be operated on the same day (93%) while ZMC and LeFort fractures were repaired within 1 week (88% and 100%, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Maxillary trauma is very heterogenous in comparison to other maxillofacial trauma patterns. Each fracture type is treated uniquely and can involve one or more provider teams depending on the extent and severity of the injury, as well as hospital resources.

Management of Isolated Zygomatic Arch Fractures and a Review of External Fixation Techniques

Introduction

Fractures of the zygomatic bone can present with complicated aesthetic and neurological pathology. Specifically, management of isolated zygomatic fracture has been sparsely discussed in the literature, and most studies are based upon older techniques. Here, we compare the results of 2 critical operative techniques as well as review the available literature in the setting of isolated zygomatic fractures.

Methods

A retrospective chart review was performed at our institution from 2010 to 2018 examining for patients who had sustained an isolated zygomatic fracture confirmed by computed tomography scan. Patients were excluded if they sustained additional maxillofacial fractures. Demographical information, symptoms on presentation, fracture management modality, and postoperative course were all collected and examined.

Results

A total of 218 patients were identified for inclusion. The average age of this cohort was 45.5 ± 18 years, with 77.5% being male. Assault (55%) was most the frequent cause of injury with accidents being the least common (17.9%). Most patients (78.8%) underwent nonoperative management. Patients who underwent operation more often presented with zygomatic deformity (97.7% vs 18.4%), paresthesia (29.5% vs 2.9%), and trismus (29.5% vs 6.9%) when compared to their nonoperatively managed counterparts. In all, 44 operatively managed patients underwent open reduction with or without eternal fixation (Gillies Approach vs Keen Approach). There were no significant differences in the presence of zygomatic deformity, paresthesia, and trismus between the 2 operative techniques.

Conclusions

Isolated zygomatic arch fractures can present with discerning symptoms. Unfortunately, the literature on appropriate management is not well described. We find external fixation to provide reestablishment of both form and function with minimal required exposure, although the outcomes may be similar without the use of external fixation.

Open Reduction Effects of Digitally Treating Zygomaticomaxillary Complex Fractures With Bio-Resorbable Materials

PURPOSE

The application of bio-resorbable plates in craniomaxillofacial surgery is increasing because of the advantage of avoiding secondary surgery. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of osteosynthesis with prebent bio-resorbable plates for treating zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) fractures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We implemented a prospective case series composed of patients with ZMC fractures who underwent treatment at the School of Stomatology at China Medical University. Bio-resorbable plates were used for fracture fixation. The fractures were stabilized with bio-resorbable plates prebent on a 3-dimensionally printed skull model with the fractures reduced using virtual simulation. The primary outcome variable was the stability rate of reduced bone segments. Other study variables were mouth opening, occlusion, paresthesia or anesthesia in the infraorbital nerve region (PAIN), and diplopia. Outcome variables were determined by calculating stability rates of reduced bone segments, resolution rates of postoperative restricted mouth opening, malocclusion, PAIN, and diplopia.

RESULTS

The sample was composed of 11 patients recruited between November 2016 and September 2018. All surgical procedures were successful, with no severe complications. The stability rate of reduced bone segments from different mechanical buttress regions was 100%. Satisfactory postoperative stability of bio-resorbable plates was obtained in all cases. The resolution rates of postoperative restricted mouth opening and malocclusion were 75 and 100%, respectively. PAIN and diplopia symptoms resolved in 50 and 100% of cases, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that osteosynthesis with bio-resorbable plates prebent on a 3-dimensionally printed skull model, designed by virtual simulation, works well for patients with ZMC fractures. Future studies should focus on the broader applications of these findings in the practice of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

Reconstruction of Complex Zygomatic Bone Defects Using Mirroring Coupled with EBM Fabrication of Titanium Implant

Reconstruction of zygomatic complex defects is a surgical challenge, owing to the accurate restoration of structural symmetry as well as facial projection. Generally, there are many available techniques for zygomatic reconstruction, but they hardly achieve aesthetic and functional properties. To our knowledge, there is no such study on zygomatic titanium bone reconstruction, which involves the complete steps from patient computed tomography scan to the fabrication of titanium zygomatic implant and evaluation of implant accuracy. The objective of this study is to propose an integrated system methodology for the reconstruction of complex zygomatic bony defects using titanium comprising several steps, right from the patient scan to implant fabrication while maintaining proper aesthetic and facial symmetry. The integrated system methodology involves computer-assisted implant design based on the patient computed tomography data, the implant fitting accuracy using three-dimensional comparison techniques, finite element analysis to investigate the biomechanical behavior under loading conditions, and finally titanium fabrication of the zygomatic implant using state-of-the-art electron beam melting technology. The resulting titanium implant has a superior aesthetic appearance and preferable biocompatibility. The customized mirrored implant accurately fit on the defective area and restored the tumor region with inconsequential inconsistency. Moreover, the outcome from the two-dimensional analysis provided a good accuracy within 2 mm as established through physical prototyping. Thus, the designed implant produced faultless fitting, favorable symmetry, and satisfying aesthetics. The simulation results also demonstrated the load resistant ability of the implant with max stress within 1.76 MPa. Certainly, the mirrored and electron beam melted titanium implant can be considered as the practical alternative for a bone substitute of complex zygomatic reconstruction.