Effect of chlorine demand on the ammonia breakpoint curve: model development, validation with nitrite, and application to municipal wastewater

Analysis of ammonia-nitrogen removal kinetics by stage in pilot scale vertical flow wetlands treating landfill leachate in series

This study explored the effect stage number and plant type have on ammonia-nitrogen (NH3-N) removal kinetics in a two-stage pilot-scale vertical flow constructed wetland (VFCW) system treating landfill leachate. Half of the VFCW columns were planted with Typha latifolia and the other half Scirpus californicus, and half of the columns were loaded with municipal solid waste landfill leachate (diluted to 1 part leachate to 2 parts total) with the effluent from these columns was collected in two separate barrels. The remaining columns were loaded with the effluent collected from the first columns, creating a two-stage VFCW system with four unique pairs to be tested. The leachate used here experienced no prior pre-treatment, and average influent concentrations of NH3-N for the first- and second-stage VFCWs were 508 and 321 mg L-1, respectively- much higher than many other VFCW treatment systems. Some reduction in chemical oxygen demand was observed, as well as generation of nitrate and nitrite, evidence of nitrification. No apparent correlation between aboveground biomass and removal of NH3-N was observed. Overall removal efficiency of NH3-N through two stages of VFCWs was 53.7% for columns planted with T. latifolia and 58.3% for those planted with S. Californicus. Average NH3-N removal efficiencies for the first stage VFCWs were 32.7% and 34.3%, while those in the second stage were 31.3% and 36.5%; no significant difference was observed between the first and second stage, suggesting that stage number does not have a significant effect on the removal efficiency of NH3-N in the primary treatment of landfill leachate via VFCWs. However, average mass removal rates of NH3-N in the first stage were 166 and 175 mg L-1 d-1; the second stage was significantly lower at 99.4 and 112 mg L-1 d-1, indicating that the first stage removed more pollutants overall.

Can quarantine plant-parasitic nematodes within wastes be managed by useful tools in a circular economy approach?

Seen as an integral part of sustainable development, circular economy represents a model of production and consumption notably based on the limitation of both resource wastage and environmental impact. Laboratories and commercial companies working on plant pathogens, in particular quarantine species, must effectively disinfect their waste to avoid disseminating these organisms. The methods used for waste disinfection can however incur high energy costs or pose environmental and human health hazards. Here, we tested the effectiveness of five disinfection methods - chlorination, heat treatment, composting, mesophilic methanation and waste stabilization ponds - on plant-parasitic nematodes belonging to the genera Globodera and Meloidogyne. For the widely used chlorination and heat treatment methods, we showed that they can be very effective in inactivating nematodes at relatively low chlorine doses and temperatures (60 °C-3 min and 50 °C-30 min), respectively. For the three other disinfection methods tested, initially designed for waste recycling, we obtained different levels of efficiency. Composting and mesophilic methanation (based on cattle or pig slurry) both led to the complete elimination of nematodes, even for short treatment durations. However, waste stabilization ponds showed contrasting results, ranging from virtually no effect to high levels of inactivation of nematodes. Our study demonstrates that it is possible to use more environmentally friendly disinfection methods to control plant-parasitic nematodes. In particular, this finding paves the way towards the treatment of infected plant materials using composting or methanation, providing that disinfection is still reached under other (real-life) treatment conditions, especially with other kinds of waste. Both composting and methanation recycle and thus valorize infected waste; they are viable alternatives to landfilling or incineration, thereby demonstrating the usefulness of a circular economy approach.